letter to the editor kj feb 17 2014

2
1 GinA, MAINE TENANTS JUSTICE LEAGUE, Inc. From: GinA ~ MAINE TENANTS JUSTICE LEAGUE <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 5:26 AM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: Response to Feb. 9th article Importance: High **2ND MESSAGE** YOUR IMMEDIATE REPLY & PUBLICATION IS DEMANDED !! Responding to your article published on 2/9 titled, "Houses behind jail eyed for Augusta courthouse parking", I must offer my input since apparently none of our city councilors are thinking about the most vital issue our city is facing lately LACK OF SAFE, LOW INCOME RESIDENTIAL HOUSING! How can our public officials even entertain any idea of demolishing more residential homes to make way for a parking lot without comparatively replacing those dwelling units when there is a perfect location for that parking lot or another parking garage on the old YMCA building site at the corner of Winthrop and State Streets. That parking garage can be connected to the old or new courthouses by a catwalk or an underground tunnel, both which already exist in our local government structures. Did I mention this property is already cleared and ready for construction and would save HUGE AMOUNTS of money for this project's bottom line? There are no buildings to purchase, no people to relocate, no structures to raze and no cleaning to perform... All that is needed is for the city to purchase the property or exercise eminent domain over that property for the greater good of the public, if necessary, which they are likely to do on Court/Perham Street if push comes to shove. And why was this tiny detail not decided and finalized BEFORE they broke ground on the new courthouse? I moved into 32 Court Street 2 weeks ago because the location and rent are perfect for my needs and the owner who, in my opinion is one of the best landlord's in the city, has been renovating the building for the past year. The article says, "to residents, the idea appears to be somewhat welcome." However, the article does not indicate that those residents total only 4 individuals who have not been faced with homelessness in the past 20 years and who do not necessarily understand the paramount need for their buildings to remain intact whether they choose to live on this block or not. The article also does not mention that those 4 buildings are actually capable of housing at least 20 people each having their own bedroom because 32 Court Street is a 6 unit building, 13 Perham is a 5 bedroom single family house, 15 Perham Street can be home for at least 3 people and 1921 Perham Street is currently home to at least 2 or more people. Regardless of the longtime residents' willingness to sell their buildings, what about low income tenants who are going to lose permanent use of 32 Court Street? Where are they going to live? We all need to stop thinking about making more business and start thinking about making more peace, which is not going to happen by destroying 4 residential homes without replacing them with 4 comparable new buildings which will house the same number of people!

Upload: ginathena

Post on 14-Apr-2016

14 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

GinA's letter to the editor of the Kennebec Journal responding to the Feb. 9th article about taking 32 Court Street Augusta for the courthouse parking lot.

TRANSCRIPT

1

GinA, MAINE TENANTS JUSTICE LEAGUE, Inc.

From: GinA ~ MAINE TENANTS JUSTICE LEAGUE <[email protected]>Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 5:26 AMTo: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'Subject: Response to Feb. 9th article

Importance: High

**2ND MESSAGE**  YOUR IMMEDIATE REPLY & PUBLICATION IS DEMANDED !!   Responding to your article published on 2/9 titled, "Houses behind jail eyed for Augusta courthouse parking", I must offer my input since apparently none of our city councilors are thinking about the most vital issue our city is facing lately ‐ LACK OF SAFE, LOW INCOME RESIDENTIAL HOUSING!  How can our public officials even entertain any idea of demolishing more residential homes to make way for a parking lot without comparatively replacing those dwelling units when there is a perfect location for that parking lot or another parking garage on the old YMCA building site at the corner of Winthrop and State Streets. That parking garage can be connected to the old or new courthouses by a catwalk or an underground tunnel, both which already exist in our local government structures.  Did I mention this property is already cleared and ready for construction and would save HUGE AMOUNTS of money for this project's bottom line? There are no buildings to purchase, no people to relocate, no structures to raze and no cleaning to perform... All that is needed is for the city to purchase the property or exercise eminent domain over that property for the greater good of the public, if necessary, which they are likely to do on Court/Perham Street if push comes to shove.  And why was this tiny detail not decided and finalized BEFORE they broke ground on the new courthouse?  I moved into 32 Court Street 2 weeks ago because the location and rent are perfect for my needs and the owner who, in my opinion is one of the best landlord's in the city, has been renovating the building for the past year.  The article says, "to residents, the idea appears to be somewhat welcome." However, the article does not indicate that those residents total only 4 individuals who have not been faced with homelessness in the past 20 years and who do not necessarily understand the paramount need for their buildings to remain intact whether they choose to live on this block or not.   The article also does not mention that those 4 buildings are actually capable of housing at least 20 people each having their own bedroom because 32 Court Street is a 6 unit building, 13 Perham is a 5 bedroom single family house, 15 Perham Street can be home for at least 3 people and 19‐21 Perham Street is currently home to at least 2 or more people.   Regardless of the longtime residents' willingness to sell their buildings, what about low income tenants who are going to lose permanent use of 32 Court Street? Where are they going to live?  We all need to stop thinking about making more business and start thinking about making more peace, which is not going to happen by destroying 4 residential homes without replacing them with 4 comparable new buildings which will house the same number of people! 

2

 I will most definitely be objecting at all stages of the legal process with whatever miniscule rights are afforded to tenantsbecause I have a right to not be forcibly removed from my home to make way for a vacant piece of property that will be used ONLY M‐F 8‐5p!  How is any of this ok with any of you?   GinA Turcotte Founder and President MAINE TENANTS JUSTICE LEAGUE 32 Court Street, Apt 1 Augusta 207.358.8887  "We understand, as human beings, the quality of our housing directly affects the quality of our existence, which directly affects the quality of our choices, which directly affects the quality of labor we're able to give, which directly affects our ability to survive. All those things are interconnected. We all share one thing. The need for safe, decent housing."