let’s collaborate! - · pdf filecreating language friendly classrooms: let’s...
TRANSCRIPT
Creating Language Friendly Classrooms:
Let’s collaborate!
Dr. Julia Starling
Speech-Language Pathologist
The University of Sydney
Lane Cove Speech Language Learning Centre
CHERI Conference
Sydney: September 2015
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 1
Overview of presentation Part 1: Brief overview of the nature and impact of
language difficulties in children and adolescents.
Part 2: Inclusive supports through professional
collaborations:
Teachers’ oral and written language
Direct vocabulary instruction
…and some activities!
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 2
So…what is a Language Impairment?
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 3
Language impairment, language difficulty, language
disorder (DSM-V), language disability, SLI,
receptive/expressive language impairment/disorder,
language-based learning difficulty….
“A difficulty with the understanding and/or use of
language in both oral and written domains*, when this
impairment cannot be attributed to a primary cause such
as intellectual impairment, neurological damage or
sensory impairment such as hearing loss” (Leonard, 1991).
*Oral language: listening comprehension, verbal expression
Written language: reading comprehension, written expression
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 4
The lowdown
Affect between 7-16% school students (?)
Are life-long difficulties (e.g. Clegg, Hollis, Mawhood, & Rutter,
2005; Conti-Ramsden, Simkin, & Botting, 2006; Johnson et al, 1999; Whitehouse, Line, Watt, & Bishop, 2009)
Affect students in all subjects, at all grade levels (even Maths, Visual Arts and PE!)
Early oral language difficulties are highly correlated with later written language difficulties (e .g. Snow et al., 2013; Stothard, Snowling, Bishop, Chipchase, & Kaplan, 1998)
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 5
A complicated picture…
ADHD, language impairment (LI), dyslexia and learning
disabilities commonly comorbid (e.g. Barkley, 2001; Kadesjo &
Gillberg, 2001; Bruce et al, 2006 )
Overlap neuropsychiatric conditions and LI (Cohen et al,
2000); executive function problems and LI (Bruce et al, 2006)
Rapid processing abilities deficit underlying LI? (Bishop,
2000; Leonard, 1998)
Link between poor working memory and language
processing deficits (Gathercole & Baddeley, 2009), also core
issue of ADHD (Cohen et al., 2000 ) AND combined ADHD/
DCD (Norrelgen et al, 1999, Kirby 2011).
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 6
Typical profiles Early years:
-Delayed speech and language development: First words often at 2 years or later, slow to develop complex sentences
-Immature grammatical constructions: e.g. retain regularities longer than other children (Me goed/I went; mouses/mice)
-Restricted vocabulary: comprehension and production
-May have fine and gross motor control issues.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 7
School age: signs and symptoms
Poor oral language impacts literacy skills
Problems with phonological awareness
Continuing grammatical difficulties
Poor vocabulary development
Slow rate of processing: oral and written language
Poor auditory working memory
May be experiencing pragmatic (social verbal) issues
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 8
Older children and adolescents
Impact of impaired language is persistent and pervasive
Later language developments: poor high order skills, literal interpretations, difficulty with analytical thinking and abstract language.
Academic: falling behind in increasingly demanding language environment; increasing demands on executive functioning; written language often becomes major issue (written expression and reading comprehension).
Psycho-social: Mental health problems, pragmatic issues continue (worse in adolescence?). Behaviours: withdrawal, acting out, distracting/easily distractible.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 9
He has
difficulty
getting his
ideas across,
he seems to
get ‘stuck’
He can’t
seem to
understand
what he’s
being asked
to do/write
about
She just
doesn’t get
it!
She can say
what she
thinks but
can’t get it
down on
paper.
When she
explains
something
it’s very
confusing.
He talks a lot
but never
gets to the
point!
Typical
observations…
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 10
I don’t know
about things
but then I
can’t go and
read about it.
She says
words all the
time that I
don’t
understand
We have to
write two
pages but I
don’t get the
question.
History, it’s
too hard and
I don’t get
the meaning
of it!
The teachers
say stuff too
fast!
How THEY see
things…
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 11
It feels like
I’m drowning
in words….
Not listening, bored
Lazy
Forgetful
“Space cadet” like, withdrawn or…
The “Class Clown”
Not engaged with class activities
Overly talkative
Disruptive
Disorganised
Incomplete work
Misreading/misinterpreting assignment tasks
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling
Smoke screens: How they come to
teachers’ attention
12
Why do we need to support young people with
LI?
Academic difficulties (Conti-Ramsden, Durkin et al. 2009; Durkin et al., 2009; Snowling et al. 2001)
Overlap oral and written language difficulties (Smart, Prior et al., 2001; Stothard, Snowling et al., 1998)
Low self esteem (Jerome, Fujiki, Brinton & James, 2002)
Psycho-social and behavioural problems (Law et al. 2009; Clegg et al., 2005)
Conduct disorders (Ripley & Yuill, 2005; Beitchman et al., 2001)
Comorbidity with ADHD (Cohen et al., 2000)
Employment issues (Whitehouse et al., 2009)
At-risk for substance abuse (Beitchman et al., 2001; Snow, 2000)
Youth offender populations: 46% (Snow & Powell, 2011)
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 13
However…….
There are many barriers to providing effective support as children get older, including:
Reluctance
Stigma issues
Limited school/ community health/private options:
NSW, Northern Territories, ACT and Western Australia school-based speech pathology services are minimal to non-existent (NSW: NO provision).
Cost of private therapy
School-based: Complex timetables Many different teachers/subjects Transference problems: discontinuity between
therapy/classroom Missed classwork
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 14
Looking at things from a
different point of view…..
Creating ‘language-accessible’ classroom environments?
SLPs empower teachers in providing inclusive support to students with LI in their classes.
By facilitating changes to mainstream teachers’ oral and written instructional language.
Teachers ensure improved access to curricular instruction for their students with LI.
Students with LI become more engaged and empowered in the learning process, across subjects and grades.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 15
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 16
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 17
The language-friendly classroom: What could it look like?
Reduced complexity of
teachers’ instructional language: oral and written
Written information that students can process mainly by themselves
Direct instruction of prioritised essential curricular vocabulary with descriptions that are relevant and use-able
Increased use of visual supports
Reduced speed of delivery/increased time for processing and production
Program developed and piloted at a Sydney secondary school (The University of Sydney and NSW Department of Education) leading to….
An RCT, with the aims of:
Evaluating the efficacy of a teacher training program.
Evaluating the sustainability of the ideas presented in the training program.
Evaluating the impact of the training program on the language abilities of secondary school students with language impairment. (Starling, Munro, Togher, & Arciuli, 2012)
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 18
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 19
Results: Teacher outcomes
When compared to teachers who had not received
the training (control group):
Trained teachers took up and used program
techniques in their classroom teaching practices
Ideas shared with teaching colleagues
Use sustained over a period of time
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 20
Student outcomes
Students whose teachers were using the modified language techniques in their regular teaching practices demonstrated significant improvements in
Written Expression
and
Listening Comprehension
The program as a manualised intervention
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 21
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 22
Quotes from teachers
“This isn’t rocket science, but its an important wake-up call!”
“Because (the students) can understand better, they can perform better”.
“They’re not so scared of big words as before the intervention.”
“They love to write, I just couldn’t believe it! It’s a Maths lesson and they actually enjoy writing about the specific terms and what they know!”
“The (program’s) brought back the awareness that some kids, behaviour-wise, may play up simply because they can’t do the work”.
“Some teachers have actually used (the ideas) with a different year group and found that they worked really well.”
“If I had this knowledge when I first started teaching I think I would have been a better teacher from the start….it’s taken me so many years to identify the fact that language is so important”.
Teachers’ oral instructional
language
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 23
Teachers talk…
explain instruct
discuss
question review
summarise explore
illustrate embellish
expand reason….
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 24
Why might students with LI be challenged?
Auditory processing problems
Attention inhibition problems
Slow RATE of auditory processing
Auditory fatigue/overload
Multi-modal learning
difficulties
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 25
Teachers’ 8 point oral language
checklist ① Balance: of oral and other forms of communication e.g.
visual aids, written texts, demonstrations, internet resources, hands-on learning….. e.g. Use a written or pictorial summary of the oral presentation; provide summary notes to students with significant auditory processing and related issues.
② Content: check complexity (vocabulary, sentence length, too many instructions at once, explicit vs. implicit language…). Beware of students’ literal interpretations!
③ Organisation and sequencing: make a plan for a well-sequenced introduction of ideas. Teachers may need to explain links, how ideas relate to each other; use visual aids e.g. concept maps, time lines…
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 26
4. Oral questioning: Ensure that all students can be involved in answering questions i.e. teachers may need to address slow rates of processing and responding.
-Increase the ‘average’ time of moving on in 0.9/sec to 3-4 seconds
-Provide a 4-5 second ‘thinking time’: no student can put up their hand during this time
-Scaffold questions: ‘Hieroglyphic writing used …’
-Give a choice of two answers
-Prepare students for the questions e.g. ‘I’m going to talk about three different causes for the outbreak of WW1, then I’ll be asking questions about them’
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 27
5. Rate: Need to address a fast rate of speaking? If
indicated, work on pausing before moving on to the
next idea. Rapid talking may also be reflected in rapid
writing (on the board)
6. Volume: could be issues of being too loud (resulting in
vocal hygiene problems?) or too soft, contributing to
auditory processing difficulties. Work on vocal
projection if necessary.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 28
7. Intonation: For some teachers working on increasing
pitch changes may be necessary, to add meaning and
interest to their oral deliveries. Adding stress to key
words/information also facilitates understanding.
8. General intelligibility: This may involve some or all of
the above (rate, volume, intonation), or a strong ‘first
language’ accent. Address through added emphasis,
adjusting rate, checking correct pronunciation of key
vocabulary, supplementing with visual aids.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 29
Teachers’ written instructional
language
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 30
Teachers’ written language…
Hand outs
instructions
glossaries board/Smartboard
assignments texts
summaries worksheets
test and exam papers…..
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 31
Why might students with LI be challenged?
Poor general literacy, including reading accuracy, rate
and comprehension problems
Sentences and paragraphs too long and complex
‘Dense’ texts, few headings and graphic aids
Unfamiliar, complex vocabulary and terminology
Abstract, high order interpretation difficulties.
Assignment questions difficult to extract from lengthy
assignment sheets, and understand.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 32
Teachers’ 5 point written language checklist Issue Strategy examples
Clarity of purpose -Use direct, unambiguous language
-Emphasise important instruction words
Use of visual aids -Brainstorm at planning stages using graphic
strategies e.g. mind maps, concept maps,
scaffolds…
-Link key terms with visual icons where
relevant
Text complexity -Use one idea per sentence
-Break up texts with headings, bold text, boxed
information
Accessibility of vocabulary -Explain meaning of instructional vocabulary
-Pre-teaching of key topic words
Clarity of instructions -Bold action words in instructions
-State the idea to be written about at the top of
the assignment sheet
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 33
Comprehension questions
If there are questions with the text, link each question with the paragraph where the answer might be. This could be done for example by numbering each question, and marking the margin of the text with the matching number.
Alternately, find key words in the questions that match the paragraph headings, this alerts the students to which paragraph to refer to, rather than reading their way through from the start of the text each time.
Another way to link questions and answers is to write questions in the margin of the text near the text that provides the answer (‘margin questions’).
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 34
‘Sometimes the
questions are
complicated and
the answers are
easy’ (Dr. Seuss)
Building vocabulary
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 35
Vocabulary, vocabulary, vocabulary….
Each new curricular topic for all subject areas involves the introduction of a set of vocabulary items and terminologies, which must be processed and retained in order to develop even the most rudimentary knowledge and application of that topic (Beck et al., 2002).
However…..
Meaning may be stated once, and supplied on a glossary sheet that is difficult to interpret.
Meanings often copied out verbatim from dictionaries, with no “real” understanding extracted.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 36
Vocabulary is vital……. For a basic understanding of the curriculum content
For students’ own communicative competence: “Getting their message across” in written and verbal expression
For literacy: students are able to identify and write words if they are already in their oral vocabulary, and vice versa
For comprehension of instructions and explanations in class
For application in a range of oral and written texts
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 37
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 38
The Case for Direct Vocabulary Instruction
‘The 30 million word gap’ (Hart & Risley, 2005) : we can help close it by proactive intervention.
Students entering school with poor oral vocabulary skills continue to be at least 2 grades behind in their vocabulary knowledge, unless receiving direct enrichment.
Wide reading enhances vocabulary. However, most young people with language difficulty are NOT wide readers.
Learning differences often means that vocabulary has to be directly taught multi-modally, to help them get to the “rich word knowledge” level: robust word learning involves an interaction of perceptual, social and linguistic cues.
Direct vocabulary instruction works! National Reading Panel, 2000; Graves, 2000; Wilson, Nash& Earl, 2010; Anderson & Nagy, 1991…….
Vocabulary: often assumed knowledge
From one Year 7 Science lesson (mixed ability class):
Endangered Carnivore
Differentiated Herbivore
Extinct Variables
Solitary Dichotomous
Pelt
Feral Savanna
Adaptations
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 39
Take a word…..
Geoarchaeological
Potentially difficult to
Say…
Spell…
Read…
Comprehend….
Write….
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 40
Vocabulary in context….
Do you know these words?
determination
requirement
adjustment
creditable
attribute
decreasing
acquisition
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 41
So, no problem understanding this then?
“In effect, the determination waives the requirement for an
adjustment note for a decreasing adjustment relating to a
creditable acquisition purchased with a corporate card in
order to attribute, to a tax period, an adjustment to an
input tax credit previously attributed on the acquisition,
provided that…………….”
Based on: Richard Lavoie’s presentations on understanding learning
disabilities: How Difficult Can This Be? The FAT City workshop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIaNxmG9JOQ
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 42
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling
Language and Maths?? Definitely……..
43
Same or Different?
If Billy is 13 years old, how old will he be in 29 years?
A car is traveling at 84 km an hour. If it maintains a consistent speed, how far does it travel in 30 minutes?
Find the sum of 27 and 15.
Mandy and Sally want to buy 8 bags of lollies for a party. Each bag costs $5.25. They have $50 to spend. Is this sufficient money? Do they need more or less?
Find the product of 2 and 21.
31 + 11 =
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 44
Overlap literacy/numeracy
High language content and reading needed for Maths competency. Inconsistencies in ‘Maths ability’ are confusing, can do very well (algebra, trigonometry…) then ‘suddenly’ drop in grades.
Life skills: employment, earnings, taxes, medications…..
Word/story problems, language ability needed to “convert” to a numerical calculation.
“ The greatest number of people visit Snapper Island in September. The least number of people visit Snapper Island in February. Describe the difference in climate conditions between these two months. In your answer calculate and include the difference in:
o The maximum temperature
o The amount of rain
o The number of rainy days” (from Year 7 Numeracy test)
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 45
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 46
Information literacy
Finding the right information requires using the right words
for the search.
a) In your biography of Germaine Greer write about the hurdles she
faced in her life.
b) Year 6 student with LI : “I couldn‘t find anything on the United
Nations!”
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 47
Internet sites: variability of information/accessibility issues.
Helpful hints:
-Assist with synonym brainstorming
-Add ‘for kids’ to search words
-Google Advance for search, select ‘Show only basic results’ under reading level
-Use ‘Simple English Wikipedia’
-https://rewordify.com
-Herring’s PLUS model: steps for information literacy
http://farrer.csu.edu.au/PLUS/index.html
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 48
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 49
Word knowledge: What does it mean to
“know “ a word? 1. No knowledge: Never seen/heard it before. (MAHOUT,
DOORING)
2. Very general sense of connotation/meaning: Feel you know it but can’t really explain what it means. (PHLOEM)
3. Context-bound knowledge: We have “learnt” a word in a single context. (AVATAR)
4. “Knowing” a word but not being able to recall it readily enough to use in a range of situations. (CONCATENATE)
5. “Robust” knowledge. (POWER)
(Beck, McKeown & Omanson 1987)
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 50
Robust word knowledge
We can define the word in a generalised way
Not dependent on context (decontextualised)
We can apply it in appropriate situations, with precision
Breadth and depth: knowledge of multiple meanings,
metaphorical use, range of derivations
Availability is “strong” i.e. ready retrieval, with well-
mapped semantic connections and clear phonological
specifications (i.e. We can READ it, SAY it, SPELL it, we
know what it MEANS and we can USE it appropriately in
a range of contexts!)
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 51
Direct Vocabulary Instruction Beck, McKeown & Kucan (2013): Bringing Words to Life
Tier 1 The most everyday,basic and familiar words in our vocabulary, that rarely need direct instruction.
Examples: clock, baby, happy, walk, face, sky….
Tier 2 Words that are of high utility for language users, but that often need to be directly taught. They are of high frequency use and are
found across a variety of domains. Examples: coincidence, absurd,
industrious, fortunate, cultural…..
Words across disciplines: evaluate, predict, inference, assess….
Tier 3 Words that are of low frequency use, or that apply to specific domains. May be essential to learning a topic.
Examples: isotope, lathe, peninsula, metamorphosis…..
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 52
Essential vocabulary
Rich knowledge of Tier 2/3 words can have a high impact on verbal functioning (oral and written)
Decision points for prioritising:
“Must know”: Essential to the learning of a topic or concept. Words should be directly and systematically taught.
“Should know”: Highly significant, although not essential, to understanding the topic or concept.
“Could know”: Interesting and stimulating, though not necessary for a basic understanding of a topic.
e.g. “communism”: interesting or essential?
Marzano’s six steps to teaching vocabulary
1. Selecting and introducing words
2. Descriptions in students own words
3. Visual representations
4. Regular exposure
5. Discussion of words amongst students
6. The play step!
http://www.marzanoresearch.com/vocabulary
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 53
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 54
10 Key Words!
**Realistic direct instructional contribution that will make a difference: 400 words a year (10/week)
High frequency and essential Tier 2/3 words Across subjects/topics/grades
Secondary Schools in LINCS Program study
-Teachers across disciplines
-Prioritised up to 10 essential words (“Must Knows”)
when planning each new topic.
-Embedded these words in all teaching
-Engaged students in interactions with these words.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 55
Alternatives to “Look it up in the dictionary!” Why?
Because students with language and literacy difficulties have problems using dictionaries They have poor alphabetic skills
They have poor reading ability
The definitions used in dictionaries (and in glossaries*) are often incomprehensible to them, so they are no better off anyway! Warning: students may learn these definitions by rote, however have no understanding of what the word really means.
(Exceptions include the Collins Cobuild series: Learner’s Dictionary )
+/- 70% English words have at least 2
meanings (Bromley, 2007).
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 56
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 57
Glossary check…..
Fenchial: A Fenchial person is a person of Fenchial descent who identifies as a Fenchial person and is accepted as such by the community in which he or she lives.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 58
Glossary: History Years 7-10 Syllabus, NSW
Board of Studies
Aboriginal: An Aboriginal person is a person of Aboriginal descent who identifies as an Aboriginal person and is accepted as such by the indigenous community in which he or she lives.
Year 7 student with LI: The original people of a country such as Australian Aborigines, American Indians and Canadian Inuits.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 59
2 alternatives
1. Morphological breakdown: root words, prefixes,
suffixes.
Meanings of 60% of multi-syllabic words can be worked out by analysing word parts (Bromley 2007)
Prefixes: pre-, un-, dis-, semi, extra- (re-, dis-, un-, and im- account for 50% of words with prefixes)
Root words: history, circle, culture…..
Suffixes: -able, -ing, -ly, -ar, -ism….. (-s/-es, -ed, -ing account for 60% of words with suffixes)
e.g.: pre-history-ic -> prehistoric
Semi-circle-ar -> semicircular
Multi–culture–al –ism -> multiculturalism
Un-de-cipher-able -> undecipherable
Antidisestablishmentarianismist??!!
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 60
2. Using context
Assist students in using context clues:
Definitions (The tundra is a vast, open area of land)
Synonyms/antonyms ( His impeccable uniform was
so perfect that…)
Examples given for a group word (The felines included
lions, tigers, cheetahs…)
Cause and effect (We lingered so long that we missed the bus)
General context (He was very patriotic and couldn’t be more proud
of his country)
Working out word meanings
The Wolf (excerpt)
Wolves have been driven from most of their
original homelands, but some still hunt in the
forests of the north and over the frozen Arctic
plains. The tundra is a vast open land that
stretches around the Arctic Ocean at the top of
the world. Here the wolf tracks the caribou, and in
some areas is almost entirely dependent upon
this antlered nomad.
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 61
Useful information
RALLI campaign: www.youtube.com/user/RALLIcampaign
Prof. Rosemary Tannock, Senior Scientist at Hospital for Sick Children,
Toronto: www.sickkids.ca/Research/Tannock-Lab/
Starling, J., Munro, N., Togher, L., & Arciuli, J. (2011a). Recognising
language impairment in secondary school student populations. Australian
Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16, 145-158.
Speech Pathology Australia: speechpathologyaustralia.org.au
Senate Inquiry into speech pathology services in Australia 2014:
Submissions 55 and 56
http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Commun
ity_Affairs/Speech_Pathology/Submissions
CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 62
Thank you! And may your time spent with young people with
language impairment be inspiring, fascinating, challenging, thought-
provoking, stimulating, informational…… and full of wonderful words!
Julia Starling
www.linksresources.com.au
With thanks to the
wordsmiths at Holy Spirit
College, Lakemba. CHERI 2015: Julia Starling 63