lessons learned from measuring cell response by quantitative automated microscopy fda workshop,...

23
Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products, Feb 2006 John T. Elliott , Alex Tona, Kurt Langenbach and Anne Plant NIST, Biochemical Science Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899

Upload: adriel-pearce

Post on 19-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy

Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy

FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products, Feb 2006FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products, Feb 2006

John T. Elliott, Alex Tona, Kurt Langenbach and Anne PlantNIST, Biochemical Science Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899

John T. Elliott, Alex Tona, Kurt Langenbach and Anne PlantNIST, Biochemical Science Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899

Page 2: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

NIST MissionNIST Mission

• Founded in 1901, NIST is a non-regulatory federal agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce

• NIST's mission: To develop and promote measurement, standards, and technology to enhance productivity, facilitate trade, and improve the quality of life.

Page 3: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Using Cells as Measurement DevicesUsing Cells as Measurement Devices

Mammalian Cell

Extracellular Matrix

NutrientsGrowth Factors

Cell-Cell InteractionsScaffold Materials

Inputs Signals

Other Factors

TopographyMechanical Forces

CellStatus

Inflammation

ProliferationDifferentiation

Remodeling

Apoptosis

Biomarkers

Protein “X”

Tenascin gene

Cell morphology

Protein “Y”

Cell Cycle Progression

Cell “Meter”Cell “Meter”

Inputs Signals

Output Signals

Assay Standards/Reference Materials

Measurement

Standards/ Reference Materials

Page 4: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Known materials/conditions

Controls

Unknown materials/test conditions

Test

Cell Response

Quantitative CellMeasurement/

InstrumentationStatistics

Schematic of a Cell-based AssaySchematic of a Cell-based Assay

•Calibration standards•Data extraction standards•SOP •Choice of statistical test

•Quality specifications•SOP

•Highly controlled environment• ± control reference materials•SOP=Standard operating procedures

•Valid biomarker for cell function•SOP for cell handling •Assay validation

•SOP

Requires Validation Steps

Page 5: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Precision, Robustness and Accuracy in Cell-based MeasurementsPrecision, Robustness and Accuracy in Cell-based Measurements

Precision – reproducibility in replicates Metric- mean ± SD, CV

Robustness – long term reproducibility Metric- variance of a quality factor (i.e. Z-factor, S/N)

Accuracy – obtaining correct answer from run Metric- comparison to a certified reference material (i.e. length or fluorescence intensity standards).

Page 6: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Expect a distribution of cell responsesExpect a distribution of cell responses

Cell Shape Gene Activation (TN1-GFP)

Single cell clone of NIH3T3-TN1-GFP-fibroblast on TCPS

•Measuring the distribution of responses provides a more accurate representation of the cell population

Page 7: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Computer w/image processing software

CCD camera

Quad Pass Beam splitterObjective

Excitation Filter wheel

X-Y translation stage

Focus motor

Emission filter wheel

Excitation lamp

Computer w/image processing software

CCD camera

Quad Pass Beam splitterObjective

Excitation Filter wheel

X-Y translation stage

Focus motor

Emission filter wheel

Excitation lamp

Automated Fluorescence MicroscopyAutomated Fluorescence MicroscopyMulti-fluorophore imagingMulti-fluorophore imaging

Cell Shape

Nucleus 3rd marker

•Image data is information rich; multiparameter information•Requires image analysis to extract data

Automated microscopy allows: -Unbiased data collection from a cell population. -Can be less labor intensive than flow cytometry

Automated microscopy allows: -Unbiased data collection from a cell population. -Can be less labor intensive than flow cytometry

Page 8: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Reference Materials for Calibrating InstrumentsReference Materials for Calibrating Instruments

•Validates instrumentation is operating properly (i.e. dynamic range, lamp intensity, and linearity of response.)

Fluorescent glass reference materials (+/- control) under development.

Calibrating fluorescence microscopes for quantitative cell-based measurements, J. Elliott et al. Under preparation.

•Length standards•Optical Property Standards•Chemical Standards

•SRM Fluorescein solution•SRM Flow Cytometry beads•SRM Fluorometer (in prep)•SRM Fluorescent wavelength

NIST Standard Reference Materials (SRM)

Page 9: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Distributions and “Mean” value of Cell-based MeasurementsDistributions and “Mean” value of Cell-based Measurements

Cell Area (m2)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

Relative GFP Fluorescence

Rel

ativ

e C

ell

Nu

mb

erR

ela

tive

Ce

ll N

um

ber

Gaussian-like Response Distribution

Non-Gaussian Response Distribution

Cell Morphology Measurement

GFP Fluorescence Measurement

Specification for reproducibility of replicate means

(precision)

=647±44 m2

=73297±8300Average

mean intensity

(n=4)

Average mean

area (n=4)

(CV=0.07)

(CV=0.11)

mean

mean

Page 10: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Dependence of Accuracy and Precision on Cell Number.Dependence of Accuracy and Precision on Cell Number.

•Precision and accuracy of the average mean GFP intensity measurement are influenced by number of cells sampled and distribution shape.

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000

Relative GFP Fluorescence

Rel

ativ

e C

ell

Nu

mb

er

mean

Non-Gaussian Response Distribution

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Mean inte

nsi

ty f

rom

replic

ate

sC

V o

f re

plic

ate

means

Cell Number Sampled

Cell Number Sampled

Accuracy

Precision

Must use this number of cells in measurement

GFP Fluorescence Measurement

Page 11: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Setting up a Minimal AssaySetting up a Minimal Assay

Processing conditions

Control Samples

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

replic

ate

s

p1 p2 p3 p4

p1 p2 p3 p4

p1 p2 p3 p4

p1 p2 p3 p4

•Control samples allow validation of biological measurement•Replicates allow uncertainty metrics to be determined

Page 12: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Z-factor as a Metric for Assay QualityZ-factor as a Metric for Assay Quality

•Average means and standard deviations are obtained from positive and negative control replicates.•Z-factors can be used to establish an assay robustness specification.

C e l l r e s p o n s e

+ C t r l- C t r l

D y n a m i c r a n g e o f a s s a y

9 5 % C o n fi d e n c e I n t e r v a l s ( ± 3

M e a n - M e a n -

(3-+ 3+)

|m-- m+|1-Z=

Reference: Zhang, et al. (1999) J. Biomol. Screen. 4, 67.

Page 13: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Using Z-factor to Evaluate an AssayUsing Z-factor to Evaluate an Assay

+Ctrl-Ctrl

Cell response

+Ctrl-Ctrl

Cell response

+Ctrl-Ctrl

Cell response

•Dynamic range is larger than confidence interval

•Sensitivity~1•Specificity~1

Z>0.5

•Dynamic range is similar to confidence intervals

•Sensitivity~0.95•Specificity~0.95

Z=0.5

•Dynamic range is smaller than confidence interval

•Sensitivity<0.95•Specificity<0.95

Z<0.5

(Requires threshold assumptions)

Dynamic range

Dynamic range

Dynamic range

Page 14: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Z-factor for a Morphology/Biomaterial AssayZ-factor for a Morphology/Biomaterial Assay

•Multiple Assays-> Robustness Specification: Z=0.50±0.05

•We use a cell morphology assay to ensure quality control of a manufactured cell culture surface.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

-Ctrl+Ctrl

Mean-

Mean+

Histogram Distributions

Cell Size (m2)

Fra

ctio

n o

f ce

lls

(31+ 32)

|m1- m2|1-Z=

Average Mean+=1686±148 (n=6)Average Mean-=5282±404 (n=5)

Z=0.53 (~200 cells/well)

-Ctrl+Ctrl

Cell areaTC polystyreneCollagen films

From Replicate Controls:

Dynamic range

Selectivity~0.95Specificity~0.95

Page 15: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Test

Control

KS Test and the D-StatisticKS Test and the D-Statistic

•The KS test is a non-parametric test for statistically comparing The KS test is a non-parametric test for statistically comparing distributions of data.distributions of data.•The The D-statisticD-statistic is the maximum absolute vertical distance is the maximum absolute vertical distance between two cumulative distributions.between two cumulative distributions.•It is sensitive to changes in distribution position and shape.It is sensitive to changes in distribution position and shape.•It varies from 0 to 1.It varies from 0 to 1.

Prepare Cumulative Distribution

D-statisticD=max(abs(c1-c2))

Cell Response

Sum

num

ber

of c

ells

Cell Response

Rel

ativ

e #

of c

ells

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Test

Control

Page 16: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Advantage of using a D-statistic over mean value differencesAdvantage of using a D-statistic over mean value differences

mean2

mean1

mean2

mean1

Yes(Z~0.5)

Measurable Difference?

Mean Value D-statistic

Cumulative DistributionsResponse Distributions

mean2mean1

+Ctrl-Ctrl

D

D

D

Cell Response Cell Response

Fra

ctio

n of

cel

ls

Sum

of

cells

0

1

No(Z=0)

No(Z=0)

Yes(Z~0.5)

Yes(Z>0)

Yes(Z>0)

Reference: Vogt A., et al. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280(19) 19078.

Page 17: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Statistical EvaluationStatistical Evaluation

Statistics can help decide if the observed difference between two measurements is likely to be caused by random chance.

•Statistics requires measurements with uncertainty values

• This means having replicate experiments (n>3 recommended)

•Statistical evaluations are most helpful in deciding if small differences are significant.

Page 18: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

SummarySummary• Cells exhibit a distribution of responses

• A valid measurement of the distribution of cellular responses requires sampling an adequate number of cells.

• Internal positive and negative controls during assay measurement can be used to evaluate assay quality and robustness.

• Alternative methods to measure differences in cell response can take advantage distribution shape information.

• Statistical analysis requires measurements with uncertainty values. It is most useful for determining the significance of small measurement differences.

Page 20: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0 5000 10000 15000

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0 5000 10000 15000

Fibrillar FilmsFibrillar Films Non-fibrillar FilmsNon-fibrillar Films

Rel

ativ

e nu

mbe

r of

cel

ls

Prepared 8.12.02

Rel

ativ

e nu

mbe

r of

cel

ls

Cell Area (m2)

Prepared 8.12.02

Cell Area (m2)

5 Replicate Films 1 year later5 Replicate Films 1 year later

5 Replicate Films 1 year later5 Replicate Films 1 year later

Reproducibility of Morphology Results

The response distribution is highly reproducible.

Page 21: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Using a D-statistic to Measure Changes in Cell Measurements.Using a D-statistic to Measure Changes in Cell Measurements.

Page 22: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Native Fibrillar Collagen Thin FilmsNative Fibrillar Collagen Thin Films

Side ViewSide View

Average 23±2 nm

Max. ~400 nm

Large fibrils (~200 nm dia, >20 m long)

Monomer/Small fibrils (~5 nm dia, <500 nm long)

~100 nm

50 m1 1 mm

AFM

Zm

ax =300nm

Zm

ax =100nm1 1 mm

AFM

Zm

ax =300nm

Zm

ax =100nm5 5 mm

AFM

Zm

ax =

30

0nm

Optical Microscopy

Page 23: Lessons Learned from Measuring Cell Response by Quantitative Automated Microscopy FDA Workshop, Potency Measurements for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,

Automated Quantitative MicroscopyAutomated Quantitative Microscopy

Computer w/image processing software

CCD camera

Beam splitterObjectiveExcitation Filter wheel

X-Y translation stage

Focus motor

Emission filter wheel

Excitation lamp

Computer w/image processing software

CCD camera

Multi Pass Beam splitterObjective

Excitation Filter wheel

X-Y translation stage

Focus motor

Emission filter wheel

Excitation lamp

Multi-fluorophore imagingMulti-fluorophore imaging

Cell Shape

Nucleus 3rd marker

Advantages: -Unbiased data collection -Sample large number of cells -Multi-fluorophore imaging -Live cell imaging -Evaluate cells in real culture conditions

Advantages: -Unbiased data collection -Sample large number of cells -Multi-fluorophore imaging -Live cell imaging -Evaluate cells in real culture conditions