Learn. Perform. Succeed

Aug 11

Environment, Safety, andOccupational Health (ESOH)

PQM-301

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N03Uoj6p9QA

2Aug 11

ESOH Learning Objectives

Given student lecture, and classroom discussion will explain how Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) considerations are incorporated into the Systems Engineering Process and Acquisition Lifecycle.

• Enabling Learning Objectives:

1. Describe the five major considerations for ensuring DoD’s compliance with ESOH requirements.

2. Explain the aspects of Programmatic Evaluation of ESOH considerations as documented by the Program Manager (PESHE).

3. Identify and discuss methods, tools and techniques used to manage and mitigate ESOH risks.

Risk Management

3Aug 11

It’s the

Law!It’s about

energy

conservation.

It’s about

prevention.

.

It’s about

cleaning up.

It’s about

better designs

It’s about

safety and

health.

Each person saw the elephant from their own point of view.

In turn, each student will see this course from a different perspective.

What is ESOH?

4Aug 11

Lesson Overview

• ESOH is a Materials and Processes Issue – not just an Environmental Issue

• Our PQM field is impacted by these issues

• ESOH risk management should include:• Laws like CAA / CWA / TSCA, etc.

• PESHE and NEPA

• System Safety Program – Mil-Std-882

• Hazardous Material Management Planning – NAS 411

• Pollution Prevention Program

• Goal to integrate ESOH considerations throughoutthe Systems Engineering process, rather than after.

• ESOH ultimately benefits the User

5Aug 11

Why Worry?

• Estimated cost to clean up DoD’s current mess: $25 - $150 billion

• 8,000 potentially contaminated sites at 900 military installations

• DoD produces nearly 1 M tons of hazardous waste each year…more than top 5 industrial producers combined

• 80% of DoD’s hazardous wastes are from weapon systems operational support activities

• Cost of hazardous material versus cost to handle, treat, & dispose of waste is 1:80

6Aug 116

ESOH Considerations

• Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health Compliance should include:• NEPA & NEPA Compliance Schedule

• Pollution Prevention Program

• Systems Safety (Mil-Std-882C)

• Hazardous Material Management Program – NAS 411

• Programmatic Environmental Safety and Health Evaluation (PESHE)

Risk Management

DAG Chapter 4: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=638356

7Aug 11

1900…………………………..1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

RHA – Rivers and Harbors Act (1899)

CAA – Clean Air Act (1963)

NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act (1969)

OSHA – Occupational Safety and Health Act (1970)

CWA - Clean Water Act (1972)

TSCA – Toxic Substance Control Act (1976)

RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (1976)

CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and

Liability Act (1980)

EPCRA – Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act

(1986)

PPA – Pollution Prevention Act (1990)

FFCA – Federal Facilities Compliance Act (1992)

RoHS – Restriction of Hazardous Substances (2003)

REACH – Regulation of Registration, Evaluation,

Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (2007)

Environmental Protection Laws

Clean Air Act (1970):

• Requires EPA to list pollutants and set standards

• Establishes National Ambient Air Quality Standards

• Requires State Implementation Plans to meet NAAQS

• Established Operating Permit Program

• Criminal act for the “senior official” at the site

• Established a bounty for finding violators

Clean Water Act (1972):

• Requires EPA to list pollutants and set standards

• Cannot discharge from a point source into navigable

waters without a permit

• Law now addresses non-point sources

• Sets civil, criminal and administrative enforcement

provisions

Toxic Substances Control Act (1976):

• Requires record-keeping on over 83,000 chemicals

(PCBs, Asbestos, Mercury, etc.)

• Authorizes the EPA to require reporting and testing of

chemical substances and mixtures

• Addresses the production, importation, use, and

disposal of specific chemicals

• Annual Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)

• Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) requirements

• (see Love Canal)

8Aug 11

Environmental Protection Laws

1900…………………………..1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

RHA – Rivers and Harbors Act (1899

CAA – Clean Air Act (1963)

NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act (1969)

OSHA – Occupational Safety and Health Act (1970)

CWA - Clean Water Act (1972)

TSCA – Toxic Substance Control Act (1976)

RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (1976)

CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and

Liability Act (1980)

EPCRA – Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act

(1986)

PPA – Pollution Prevention Act (1990)

FFCA – Federal Facilities Compliance Act (1992)

RoHS – Restriction of Hazardous Substances (2003)

REACH – Regulation of Registration, Evaluation,

Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (2007)

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation

and Liability Act (1980):

• Requires the EPA to designate substances as harmful

• Requires the immediate notification of the release of a

hazardous material to the National Response Center

• Grants the EPA extensive authority to require cleanup

• Assigns cleanup cost to the responsible parties

EMERGENCY PLANNING & COMMUNITY

RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT (1986):

• Requires states to develop programs for responding to

hazardous chemical releases

• Requires industry to report/notify the public of the

release or potential release of hazardous substances

• Sets State Emergency Response Commission and

Local Emergency Planning Coordinator

Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (1977):

• Authorizations EPA to identify Hazardous Waste

(Ignitable, Corrosive, Reactive, and/or Toxic)

• Regulates the generation, transportation, treatment,

storage, and disposal through permits and records

• Sets extensive liabilities

9Aug 11

Environmental Protection Laws

1900…………………………..1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

RHA – Rivers and Harbors Act (1899

CAA – Clean Air Act (1963)

NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act (1969)

OSHA – Occupational Safety and Health Act (1970)

CWA - Clean Water Act (1972)

TSCA – Toxic Substance Control Act (1976)

RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (1976)

CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and

Liability Act (1980)

EPCRA – Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act

(1986)

PPA – Pollution Prevention Act (1990)

FFCA – Federal Facilities Compliance Act (1992)

RoHS – Restriction of Hazardous Substances (2003)

REACH – Regulation of Registration, Evaluation,

Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (2007)

Federal Facilities Compliance Act (1992):

• Directs EPA to conduct annual inspections of federal

facilities

• Requires the agency to pay for the inspection

• Empowers EPA to fine federal agencies

• Empowers states to fine federal agencies

• Federal Agencies are exempt from criminal actions but

not their employees

•

RoHS (2003):

• A directive on the restriction of the use of hazardous

substances in electrical and electronic equipment

• Closely linked with the Waste Electrical and Electronic

Equipment Directive (WEEE) 2002/96/EC

REACH (2007):

• Requires anyone producing or importing chemicals

into the European Union to register these chemicals

with the European Chemicals Agency

• This includes over 143,000 listed chemicals

• Requires sharing information up and down the supply

chain

• Considered the “strictest law to date in the entire

world

10Aug 11

Occupational Health

• Physical Injuries

• Repetitive Motion Disorders

• Hearing Loss

• Vision & Blindness

• Illness by Ingesting Unsafe Substances

• Illness by Exposure to Germs / Viruses

• Radiation Sickness

• Psychosocial Issues

Safety

Engineering

Chemistry

Industrial

Hygiene

Public

Health

Health

Physics

Occupational

Medicine

Laws &

Enforcement

4,405

11Aug 11

Typical DoD Violations

• Air Force agrees to clean up groundwater at Air Force Plant 44, Tucson

The Air Force has signed an agreement to clean up Air Force-owned property at Air Force Plant 44, part of the Tucson International Airport Area Superfund Site. Under the terms of the federal facility agreement, the Air Force will work with the EPA to clean up areas impacted by Air Force Plant 44. Groundwater at the site is contaminated with volatile organic compounds and other chemicals.

• Army research facility agrees to pay penalty for hazardous waste violations

The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory in Hanover, N.H. will pay for violations of federal and state hazardous waste management laws. The facility failed to determine whether several containers held hazardous wastes, failed to properly label hazardous wastes containers, and accumulated hazardous waste in an area with a floor drain without taking measures to prevent a leaks.

• Former Coast Guard Officer sentenced for lying about vessel pollution

David G. Williams, a former Chief Warrant Officer in the U.S. Coast Guard and main propulsion assistant for the Coast Guard Cutter Rush, was sentenced in U.S. District Court in Hawaii for making a false statement to federal criminal agents investigating allegations of potential discharges of oil-contaminated waste from the cutter into the Honolulu Harbor. Williams was sentenced to pay a $5,000 fine, serve 200 hours of community service and serve two years of probation.

12Aug 11

Current Issue(What Laws?)

On Jan. 9, a clear, licorice-smelling chemical leaked from a storage tank into the Elk River in West Virginia, contaminating the drinking water for much of the state, including the capital, Charleston. Two weeks later it was disclosed that a second chemical was involved:• MCHM (methylcyclohexanemethanol)

• The 15-page MSDS uses the phrase “no data available” 152 times:

FREEDOM INDUSTRIES

• Repeated dose toxicity: “No data available.”

• Carcinogenicity: “No data available.”

• Reproductive toxicity: “No data available.”

• Specific target organ toxicity, repeated

exposure: “No data available.”

EPA

Army Corps of Engrs.

13Aug 11

The NEPA affects virtually every proposed action on military installations and for many acquisition programs. NEPA requires federal agencies to document their consideration of environmental factors by writing environmental impact statements (EIS) during their decision-making processes.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

2010

14Aug 11

Pollution Prevention Program

• Rules and Laws:• DoD 5000.02 tasking to PM

• FAR 11.002 – Energy Efficiency/Preferred Materials

• E.O. 13101 – Green Gov.

• DODI 4715.4

• ISO 14000 Series

• Identify & Quantify

• ESOH risks of system

• Minimize system impacts

Land

Ground

Water

Surface Water

Air

15Aug 11

• Prevent or reduce at source

• Recycle

• Treat

• Dispose only as last resort

• “Action-forcing” provisions

• Release of Environmental Information to Public, before decisions / actions

Pollution Prevention Act

Risk Management

Hierarchy

16Aug 11

Voluntary Compliance Efforts

• EPA 33/50 Program (1999)

• Voluntary Protection Program (OSHA)

• Operational Risk Management (Navy)

• Suggestion Programs

• ISO 14000 - EMS

EPA List of 17

Benzene

Cadmium & Compounds

Carbon Tetrachloride

Chloroform

Chromium & Compounds

Cyanides

Dichloromethane

Lead & Compounds

Mercury & Compounds

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

Nickel & Compounds

Trichloroethane

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

Trichloroethylene

Xylene(s)

17Aug 11

• Explosives Safety

• LASER Safety

• Noise Pollution

• Greenhouse gases

• Nanomaterials

• Human Systems Integration

• MANPRINT

• NAVPRINT

• Sustainable Manufacturing

Recent ESOH Concerns

x 100,000

Single-Walled

Carbon Nanotube

Strand of

Human Hair

AMPEC Facility, Henderson, NV

18Aug 11

System Safety

• System Safety

• Software Safety

• Explosives Safety

• Laser Safety

• Occupational Safety• Accident Avoidance

• Safety Hazard Avoidance

• Health Hazard Avoidance

• Public Safety

• Cradle to Grave

MIL-STD-882 Gold Standard

Proven risk management techniques and principles

Provides common approach across program and contractors

Provides common approach across other functional areas

19Aug 11

Risk Mitigation

1. Eliminate through design

2. Reduce to acceptable level through design

3. Reduce to acceptable level through external devices

4. Reduce to acceptable level through warning devices

5. Reduce to acceptable level through procedures and training

Systems Engineering

20Aug 11

Hazardous Material

• DoD 5000.02 tasking to PM

• NAS 411: HMMP

• Hazardous Material Management Plan

Identification / Evaluation

Specifications / Standards

Specialized Training & Documentation

• Identify & Quantify

• HAZMAT in > HAZWASTE out

• Manufacture - Operations

• NEPA Hierarchy

21Aug 11

Material Safety Data Sheets

• Detailed descriptions of material

• Hazards and precautions

• Personal Protective Equipment required

• Procedures for handling and mishaps

• B-2 Program: Over 6000 MSDS

• Reduce / Reuse provisions

• MSDS for items not considered HAZMAT

• Unknown Hazards?

22Aug 11

General Information

Product: Coffee, Columbian

Intended Use: Jump start students

Chemical Family: Beanus Alertis

Physical Data

Boiling Point: 100 Degrees C

Appearance: Dark Brown

Odor: Vanilla

pH Levels: 4.5 to 5.0

Flash Point: N/A

Health & Hazard Information

May cause trembling & headaches.

Some students have been found awake

during a lecture!

Emergency First Aid

Give students large quantities of viewgraphs

and flush with lots of cold water.

Reactivity Data

Stability: Stable under normal conditions.

Cream & sugar will cause pH to increase.

Special Precautions

Protective Equipment: Tums

Applicable Laws

CWA TSCA CERCLA

SuperFund & CoffeeFund

Example MSDS

23Aug 11

Integration of ESOH in Systems Engineering

• PESHE

• Trade Studies

• Total Life Cycle Cost

• Preplanned Product Improvement

• Knowledge Management

• Technical Reviews

Interoperability

Disposal

Software

ESOH

Corrosion

Prevention

QualityManufacturing

Capability

Open

Systems

HSI RAM

Defense Acquisition Guidebook 4.4

Design Considerations

24Aug 11

PESHE

Program Managers (PMs) must prepare a Programmatic ESOH Evaluation (PESHE) regardless of the program's acquisition category designation. A current PESHE document is required at:

• Milestone B,

• Milestone C, and the

• Full Rate Production Decision Review.

25Aug 11

PESHE

The PESHE should include: • Identification, assessment, mitigation, and acceptance of ESOH risks

• Ongoing evaluation of mitigation effectiveness

• A Compliance Schedule for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Executive Order (E.O.) 12114, "Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions," documentation.

• The PESHE communicates the status of ESOH efforts and risk management for the system. The Acquisition Strategy (AS) must also include a summary of the PESHE and the NEPA/EO 12114 Compliance Schedule.

• The Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) should also include a reference to the strategy for integrating ESOH into the systems engineering process, as documented in the PESHE.

26Aug 11

5000.2 Requirements

• The PM shall integrate ESOH risk management into the overall systems engineering process.

• The PM shall eliminate ESOH hazards where possible, and manage ESOH risks where hazards cannot be eliminated using MIL-STD-882D.

• PMs shall report on the status of ESOH risks and acceptance decisions at technical reviews. The PM shall document that the associated risks have been accepted by the following acceptance authorities:

• CAE for high risks,

• PEO-level for serious risks, and

• PM for medium and low risks.

• The user shall provide formal concurrence prior to all serious-and high-risk acceptance decisions.

27Aug 11https://acc.dau.mil/adl/en-US/385750/file/56276/ESOH_in%20Acquisition_Guide_4-24-09.pdf

ESOH Acquisition Guide

Preliminary

Hazards List

- Chromium

- Cyanides

- Lead

- Toluene

28Aug 11

https://acc.dau.mil/adl/en-US/385750/file/56276/ESOH_in%20Acquisition_Guide_4-24-09.pdf

ESOH Acquisition Guide

Initial ESOH Planning

Tech. Dev. Strategy

Contract Language

ESOH / SE Integration

PESHE Process

Acquisition Strategy

Contract Language

ESOH / SE Integration

ESOH/System Safety

Risk Management

ESOH / NEPA

Compliance

Hazmat Planning

ManTech Investments

PESHE Process

Acquisition Strategy

Contract Language

ESOH / SE Integration

ESOH/System Safety

Risk Management

ESOH / NEPA

Compliance

Hazmat Planning

ManTech Investments

PESHE Process

Acquisition Strategy

Contract Language

ESOH / SE Integration

ESOH/System Safety

Risk Management

ESOH / NEPA

Compliance

Hazmat Planning

ManTech Investments

ESOH in Sustainment

and Operations

ESOH Planning for

Modifications

29Aug 11

ESOH in Acquisition Guide

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-080402-030.pdf

30Aug 11

Functional Analysis Events

The PESHE & Program Management

ACQUISITION STRATEGY

Test &

Evaluation

Strategy

Systems

Engineering

Plan

Technology

Development

Strategy

Manufacturing

Plan

Integrated

Logistics

Support Plan

Human

Systems

Integration

Risk Management Issues

Programmatic:

Total Ownership Cost

Schedule

Performance

Environment:

Compliance

Pollution

Prevention

HAZMAT/

HAZWASTE

Safety:

Hazard ID,

Documenting,

Training,

Devices,

Risk Reduct.

Occupational

Health:

Ergonomics,

MWR,

Community

Relations

Planning:

Technical Issues

PPBE

Customer Feedback

Documentation

31Aug 11

ESOH Factors in Source Selection

• SOO/SOW

• HMMP (NAS 411)

• Compliance History

• HAZMAT habits (TRI)

• Safety Plan (MIL-STD-882)

• RFP

• HMMP / PPP

• Compliance History

• HAZMAT Habits (TRI)

• Health & Safety Plans

• Integration of ESOH in S.E.P.

• Design

• Test

• Manufacturing

• Operations & Maintenance

• Disposal

Possible Evaluation Criteria

Does the offeror understand how to manage ESOH risks?

Does the offeror have an existing safety plan?

Does the offeror have a staff, organization, and methodology supporting responsible ESOH habits?

Does the offeror understand what makes a good HMMP?

Does the offeror show proper integration of ESOH considerations in its System Engineering Plan?

Does the offeror make ESOH decisions based on sound practices?

32Aug 11

Technical Reviews

• Identify pollution prevention opportunities and document in program documentation

• Review HMM efforts

• Identify HAZMAT use (baseline) and alternatives

• Define ESOH impacts from system

• Review waste disposal requirements

• Verify technical documentation changes

Coordinate with test,

users, engineers, and

logistics during reviews

to determine ESOH

requirements early and

throughout the process.

PESHE UpdatesPESHE

Post

PDR / CDR

33Aug 11

Trade-off Studies

• Determine whether the material or process is critical to performance requirements or if an alternative can be used.

• Based on whether new material:• is a valid need

• is being used already

• is available in supply system

• Or if the existing material:• has no acceptable alternative

• has an operational impact

• has regulatory impacts – O&S

Requirements Management &

Logical AnalysisTest & Evaluation of Alternatives

• Performance Testing• Bench Test / Laboratory

• Process Prototype

• Field Test by User

• Prove Alternative Works

Alternative meets performance

New materials are compatible

New materials are not worse than previous materials

Operator / User buy-in for new process & materials

34Aug 11

Environmental Cost Factors

The spider diagram is a useful

tool to display the various

environmental factors in a way

that provides you some insight

into their relative cost

compared to other options.

The resulting diagram will help

you to identify the best

alternative. In this case the

smaller the area of impact, the

better the option. Option A

has the least negative impact

and given other factors are

equal (cost, schedule, and

performance) then you should

select this option.

WaterUse

MissionImpacts

ErgonomicsHealth

Impacts

EnergyUseAcquisition

Impacts

Option A

Option B

Option C

Option D

Land Use

HazMatManagement

PollutionPrevention

Design forEnvironment

Conservation

NEPA Compliance

Demilitarization

Disposal

HazMatManagement

Restoration

Remediation

MedicalBills

HealthInsurance

Sick Leave

Hospitalization

Rehabilitation

35Aug 1135

ESOH Impacts to the Program

• Cost- Personal Protective Equipment

- Hazard Communication

- Medical Surveillance

- Toxicity Assessment

- Monitoring

- Record Keeping

• Schedule- ESOH Acceptance and

Approvals may delay or stop program during reviews.

- NEPA Reporting and compliance delays

- Environmental Assessment

- Environmental Impact Statement & Review

- Production Line Delays

- EPA Shutdown

- Supply Chain Impacts

- Justification of existing process

- Implementation of NEW process or materials

• System Safety- Damage/Loss due to accidents

- Equipment unavailable

- Lost business due to cleanup

- Lost work days due to injury

- Worker / User / Bystander fatality

- Litigation

• Performance- Existing Process or Material

- O & S Impacts down the line

- New Process or Material

- Reduced capability

- Reduced availability

- Technological Maturity

- Availability in quantity?

- Operationally viable?

- Sustainable?

36Aug 11

Knowledge Management(Document Your Actions & Decisions)

• PM should:

• Perform post-deployment evaluations

• Validate training material

• Document lessons learned

• Assess measures of quality

• Capture lessons learned from other programs / legacy systems

• Apply CPI tools and lean concepts to process areas

• Market Research & Studies to introduce new technologies when practicable

Change System/Component to Eliminate Need for HAZMAT

Change System Documentation to Specify Alternative

Change System Documentation to Implement Alternative Material/Process

Continue Using Existing HAZMAT

• Justify Why...

• Describe How...

• Ensure Controls Meet Compliance Standards

• Implement HMMP

Decision Support & Business Intelligence Record of Decision > POA&M

37Aug 11

Sustainable Manufacturing Initiative (SMI)

• Sustainable Manufacturing: the creation of manufactured products using processes that minimize negative environmental impacts, conserve energy and natural resources, are safe for employees, communities, and consumers and are economically sound. - DoC

Sustainable Manufacturing is based on three precepts:

• Limit Usage

• Use Renewable Resources when possible

• Manage Non-Renewable Resources

Sustainable manufacturing “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of

future generations to meet their own needs.” United Nations

Sustainable Manufacturing builds on several

life cycle considerations as outlined in the

graphic.

38Aug 11

NIST on SM

Sustainable Manufacturing:“Ensuring a sustainable future requires an integrated system of systems approach.

Using a VSM, ACS, a New Mexico company, was able to eliminate excess movement, materials, and tooling to help create a more streamlined product flow. The company reducedcosts by 65%, increased production from 20 units per shift to 45 units per shift, reduced its production facility size by 73%, and reduced scrap rates from 24% to 1.8%.

39Aug 11

DoD & Sustainable Manufacturing

• Defense Acquisition Guidebook highlighting SMfg:• Acquisition Strategy element

• Component in EMD Phase as a production concept

• Source Selection factor for selecting manufacturer

• Corporate Social Responsibility

• Improve public perception of DoD

• Mitigate potential liability

• Cost Savings

• Process efficiencies

• Conservation of materials

• Balance – but mission comes first!

Executive Order 13423 - JAN 2007

• Reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions

• Use renewable energy

• Reduce water consumption

• Reduce HAZMAT

• Increase energy efficiency in buildings

• Procure energy efficient equipment

DAU CLM on Sustainable Manufacturing

40Aug 11

ISO 14000Environmental Management Systems

41Aug 11

ESOH and Lean

• Henry Ford: Was Lean before Lean was cool.

• TMMK: benchmarks energy consumption against the rest of the industry using the ENERGY STAR automobile assembly Energy Performance Indicator (EPI). The results have been a reduction in energy consumption per vehicle from from 6.3 MMBtu per vehicle in 2004 to less than 4.53 MMBtu per vehicle in 2008 for Plant 2.

• TIMWOOD + creativity

42Aug 11

ESOH Benefits the User

• ESOH elements

• NEPA

• Safety

• Occupational Health

• Hazardous Material Management

• Pollution Prevention

• Explosives Safety

43Aug 11

ESOH Module Summary

• Assess ESOH risk early and often:

• PESHE

• NEPA

• System Safety

• Hazardous Material Program NAS 411

• Understand how hazardous materials impact cost, schedule & performance

• Document results – use SEP, PESHE, TEMP as management tools to document your ESOH program

• Conduct trade studies and use risk management to focus on ESOH issues throughout the life cycle

• Influence the procurement process – in RFP/SOO/etc.

• Ask your service/program office ESOH representatives for help

44Aug 11

ESOH Learning Objectives

Given student lecture, and classroom discussion will explain how Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) considerations are incorporated into the Systems Engineering Process and Acquisition Lifecycle.• Enabling Learning Objectives:

1. Describe the five major considerations for ensuring DoD’s compliance with ESOH requirements.

2. Explain the aspects of Programmatic Evaluation of ESOH considerations as documented by the Program Manager (PESHE).

3. Identify and discuss methods, tools and techniques used to manage and mitigate ESOH risks.

Risk Management