lek - valuation techniques

Upload: commodity

Post on 07-Aug-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    1/42

    Auckland

    Bangkok 

    Beijing

    Boston

    Chicago

    London

    Los Angeles

    Melbourne

    Milan

    Munich

    Paris

    San Francisco

    Shanghai

    Singapore

    Sydney

    Valuation Techniques Review 

    The materials contained in this document are intended to supplement a discussion.These perspectives will only be meaningful to those in attendance.

    L.E.K. Consulting LLC

    One North Wacker Drive39th Floor 

    Chicago, IL 60606

    USA

    t: 312.913.6400

    f: 312.782-4583

    www.lek.com

    January 8, 2003

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    2/42

    1

    Learning Objectives

      Discuss management’s mission

      Present the fundamental principle behind all value creating acquisitions and divestitures

      Discuss why it is difficult for buyers to create value with mergers and acquisitions

      Present a process for creating value with mergers and acquisitions

      Make a distinction between price and value

      Review different models used to estimate prices and values

    -   Asset approaches-   Multiples

    -   Premiums-   Market Capitalization-   Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    3/42

    2

    Management's mission is to create value for shareholders

      This mission has long been accepted, and is consistent with fiduciary duty andresponsibility

      If shareholders are not adequately compensated, the firm will be unable to attract newcapital required to compete and eventually lose its ability to benefit any stakeholder 

      Focusing on shareholder value allows managers to take the actions necessary to

    ensure the company's capital is put to its best use

      Less clearly understood is how to:

    -   measure value creation

    -   make decisions that are consistent with this mission-   measure the progress of the organization

    MANAGEMENT'S MISSION

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    4/42

    3

    To create value, management must choose strategies that effectively balance theneeds of all stakeholders in the long run

    MANAGEMENT'S MISSION

    Key Corporate Stakeholders

    Strategy

       V  a   l  u

      e

    Government   V  al     u e

    Shareholders

    V   a l  u  e 

    Local Community

      V a  l u e

    Customers

    V   a l  u  e 

    Suppliers

     V  a l     u e

    Employees

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    5/42

    4

    Shareholder value is the guiding link among management activities

    MANAGEMENT’S MISSION

    Employee &Investor 

    Communications

    PerformanceMeasurement

    and InformationSystems

    FinancialPolicies &Practices

    Maximizationof 

    Shareholder Value

    Shareholder value management is making all operating, investing and financingdecisions according to their impact on value. It means changing the way you thinkabout running your business and creating a culture of concern for value.

    StrategyFormulation

    CorporateDevelopment

    IncentiveCompensation

    Shareholder Value Management

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    6/42

    5

    The principle of finding the highest valued use for all assets guides all acquisitionand divestiture decisions

    Principle:

    PortfolioImplications:

    ValuationCondition:

    Find the Highest Valued Usefor All Assets

    Keep or Potentially Acquire Divest or Avoid Buying

    Value

    to You

    Value

    to Others>

      Value

    to You

    Value

    to Others  >

    CREATING VALUE WITH M&A

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    7/42

    6

    However, creating value from acquisitions can be difficult for buyers

    CREATING VALUE WITH M&A

    Average Returns from Acquisitions

    Buyer Target-10%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%1963-681968-801980-84

       S   h  a  r  e   h  o   l   d  e  r   R  e   t  u  r  n  s

    Source: Bradley, Desai and Kim, “Synergistic Gains From Corporate Acquisitions and

    Their Division Between Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms,” Journal of FinancialEconomics, 21.1 (1988)

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    8/42

    7

    There are several elements of successful acquisitions

    Elements Purpose Key Questions

    Right Strategy   •   Clear objectives and

    criteria•   Well selected candidates

    Can you make an acquisition

    candidate more valuable?

    Right information   •   Correct strategyformulation

    •   Product/market dynamics•   Assessment of synergies•   Proper valuation

    Do you know exactly whatyou are buying?

    Right Price   •   Establish "walk away"price with synergies

    •   Assess alternative

    bidder's strategies

    Will you create value for your shareholders?

    Right Implementation   •   Integration teams•   Value-linked targets and

    timetables•   Monitoring and incenting

    Can you quickly gain thebenefits?

    M&A PROCESS

    Elements of Successful Acquisitions

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    9/42

    8

     An appropriate acquisition process helps increase the probability that you will create value with mergers and acquisitions

    Strategic

    Fit

    Target &MarketAssess

    Valuation  Deal

    Structure  Negotiation

      Due

    Diligence  Integration

    Search and

    Screen

    *Sequence can vary significantly

    M&A PROCESS

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    10/42

    9

    Which prices and values are we calculating? 

    PRICE VS. VALUE

    Break Up

    Asset

    Market

    Shareholder 

    Stand-Alone

    With Synergies

    To You

    To Others

    Current Stock

     Your Offer 

    Other's Offers

    Max. You Will Pay

    Max. Others Will Pay

    Closing Price

    Price Value

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    11/42

    10

    The value created in an acquisition is the difference between the target's value toyou and the price you paid 

      Definitions of price and value:

    -   Price is what you pay for something

    -   Value is what it is worth to you

      For acquisitions, these definitions have an obvious implication:

    Value - Price = Value Created

    PRICE VS. VALUE

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    12/42

    11

    The value of a company will be the highest of its acquisition, current and break upvalues

    PRICE VS. VALUE

    The Value Spectrum

    STRATEGY SYNERGIES

    Break Up

    Value

    Current

    Value

    Acquisition

    Value

      Also known asasset value or liquidation value

      Assumes that thebest strategy for 

    the business is tocease operations

      Also known asstand-alone value

      Assumes that thebest strategy is thecurrent strategy

      Also known asvalue withsynergies

      Includes synergiesthe firm might be

    able to create withother businesses

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    13/42

    12

    Several methods can be applied to value companies, but they are not necessarily equivalent 

    METHODOLOGY   CALCULATION FOCUS  STRATEGY

    VALUED

    Net Assets Assets - Liabilities Value Break-up

    Comparable Multiples- Price/Earnings- Price/Cash Flow- Market Value/Book Value- Price/Sales

    Calculate using current prices:P/E x EarningsP/CF x Cash FlowMarket/Book x Book ValueP/Sales x Sales

    Price Current

    Comparable Transactions- Premium to market value- Premium to book value- Acquisition Multiples

    (Shares x Price ) + a premiumBook Value + a premiumCalculate using acquisition prices:P/E x EarningsP/CF x Cash FlowMarket/Book x Book ValueP/Sales x Sales

    Price Synergistic

    DCF Cash flows forecasted under thecurrent strategy discounted at theweighted average cost of capital

    Value Current

    DCF with synergies Cash flows forecasted usingsynergistic strategy discounted atweighted average cost of capital

    Value Synergistic

    PRICE VS. VALUE

    Common Valuation Methods

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    14/42

    13

    Because of the dynamics of the bidding environment, only unique synergies canbe reliably saved for buyers' shareholders

    PRICE VS. VALUE

    Example: Two Bidder Transaction

    Target's

    CurrentValue

      Bidder A'sWalk Away

    Bidder B'sWalk Away

    Common Synergies(go to Seller)

    UniqueSynergies(go to

    Buyer)

    Deal Price

    Bidder A

    Bidder B

    It is not enough to be able to create synergies

     You must be able to create more synergies than other bidders

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    15/42

    14

    DCF is the appropriate valuation method for most companies

      DCF yields the value of a business, not just its price

      DCF value is driven by the factors that affect value of all businesses

    -   Cash flows-   Timing-   Risk

      It can be used to estimate either current value or a target’s unique synergistic value

    -   Use expected cash flows under the current strategy to calculate a current value-   Use cash flows that include the unique synergies to estimate a synergistic value

      By using expected cash flows, DCF links value to changes in strategy

    DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW FRAMEWORK

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    16/42

    15

    The DCF framework discounts operating cash flows to estimate a company'svalue

    DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW FRAMEWORK

    (C)

    Forecast PeriodResidual Period

    +

    +

    =

    - =

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 - - - - - - - -

    Residual Value

    CF CF CF CF CF1 2 3 4 5

    (A)

    (B)

    (D)

    (E)

    Present Value

    of OperatingCash Flow

    Present Valueof Residual

    Value

    Non OperatingAssets

    Corporate ValueMarket Value

    of Debt and other Obligations

    Shareholder Value

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    17/42

    16

    Because value is a function of cash flow, the components of operating cash flow are known as value drivers

    2002 Cash Flow from OperationsAcme Corporation

    ($MILLIONS)

    Sales   $250.0

    Cash Operating Expenses   (236.5)Cost of Goods Sold   (196.4)

    SG&A   (38.8)

    Economic Depletion   (1.3)

    Operating Profit   $13.5

    Cash Taxes   (4.1)

    Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT)   $9.4

    Incremental Fixed Capital Investment   (1.4)

    Total Fixed Capital Investment   (2.7)

    Economic Depletion   1.3

    Incremental Working Capital Investment   (2.9)

    Operating Cash Flow   $5.1

    ESTIMATING OPERATING CASH FLOW (A)

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    18/42

    17

     A simple set of value drivers can be used to forecast cash flows

    Forecast Cash Flow from OperationsAcme Corporation

    ($Millions)

    ESTIMATING OPERATING CASH FLOW (A)

    2003 2004 2005

    Sales (10.8% Growth) $277.0 $306.9 $340.0

    Operating Expenses (261.9) (290.2) (321.5)

    Operating Profit (5.4% of Sales) $15.0 $16.7 $18.5

    Cash Taxes (36% of Op. Profit) (5.4) (6.0) (6.6)

    NOPAT $9.6 $10.7 $11.8

    Incr. Fixed Capital Investment(5.0% of Change in Sales) (1.3) (1.5) (1.7)

    Incr. Working Capital Investment(10.0% of Change in Sales) (2.7) (3.0) (3.3)

    Operating Cash Flow $5.6 $6.2 $6.9

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    19/42

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    20/42

    19

    The weighted average cost of capital is used to discount cash flows to a present value

      It is the weighted average return required by a company's debt and equity investors

      In order to create value, companies must earn a return greater than the cost of capital

      Cost of capital varies across business units, companies and industries and is affectedby capital structure

      If the cost of capital is not known, it is impossible to know whether value is beingcreated

    ESTIMATING OPERATING CASH FLOW (A)

    Weighted Average Cost of Capital Formula

    K = Kd x (1 - T) x + Ke xDebt

    Debt + EquityEquity

    Debt + Equity( )( )

    KKdTDebtEquityKe

    ======

    Weighted Avg. Cost of CapitalCost of DebtCash Tax RateMarket Value of DebtMarket Value of EquityCost of Equity

    Where:

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    21/42

    20

    The cost of equity is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

    h Risk-free rateqThe return investors could make by investing in a perfectly safe securityqUse the ten-year government bond yield

    h Market risk premiumqThe amount above the risk-free rate that investors demand for accepting the systematic

    risk that cannot be diversified away when investing in the stock market

    h Adjustment for firm risk

    qThe extent to which a company has more or less systematic risk than the marketqAlso adjusts for the amount of financial leverage a company has in its capital structure

    Cost of Equity =Return on a

    Risk-Free

    Investment

    +  Market Risk

    Premium  X

    Adjustmentfor Firm Risk

    (Beta)

    Cost of Equity Formula

      [[

    ESTIMATING OPERATING CASH FLOW (A)

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    22/42

    21

    The cost of equity increases as debt is added to the capital structure

    Suppose that you own 50% of a business:

    Value = $100

     Your Ownership:

     Your Risk:

     Your Volatility:

    100% Equity Financing

    +/- $10

     Your Stake50% Equity

    Other’s Stake50% Equity

    $50

    +/- $5

    10%

    If some owners are insulated from risks (e.g., debt holders) the other owners (e.g., shareholders) must face increased risk.

    50% Debt Financing

    +/- $10

     Your Stake100% Equity

    Other’s Stake

    100% Debt

    $50

    +/- $10

    20%

    ESTIMATING OPERATING CASH FLOW (A)

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    23/42

    22

    Therefore, if you are using a peer group approach to calculate the cost of equity,and the peers have different leverage than the business being valued, their betas

    must be “relevered” 

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%10%

    12%

    14%

    16%

    18%

    20%

      0   %   8   %   1  6   %

       2  4   %

      3   2   %

      4  0   %

      4  8   %

       5  6   %

      6  4   %

       7   2   %

    Debt / Total Capital

       R  a   t  e  o   f

       R  e   t  u  r  n

    Cost of Equity

    Pre-Tax Cost of DebtCost of Capital

    Cost of Capital as a Function of Leverage

    PeersTargetLeverage

    ESTIMATING OPERATING CASH FLOW (A)

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    24/42

    23

    You can use the “Peer Group Beta” sheet to perform this calculation

    ESTIMATING OPERATING CASH FLOW (A)

    Peer Group Beta Analysis

    Peers for:   Acme Corporation

    Peers

    Peer 

    (Levered)

    Beta

    Peer Debt to

    Equity %

    Peer 

    Operating

    Cash Tax

    Rate %

    Unlevered

    Beta

    Target Debt

    to Equity %

    Company

    Operating

    Cash Tax

    Rate %

    Relevered

    Beta Weight

    Peer 1 0.93 15.4% 35.0%   0.84   9.8% 35.0%   0.90   1.00Peer 2 1.29 124.0% 37.2%   0.73 9.8% 35.0% 0.77   1.00

    Peer 3 1.20 5.8% 36.0%   1.16 9.8% 35.0% 1.23   1.00

    Peer 4 1.33 45.1% 38.0%   1.04 9.8% 35.0% 1.11   1.00

    Peer Group Weighted Average

    Relevered Beta:  1.00

    Peer Information Company Information

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    25/42

    24

    To calculate residual value, use the model that corresponds to the economics of the firm after the forecast period 

    RESIDUAL VALUE (B)

    Valuation Model

    Net Asset

    ComparableTransaction Multiple

    DCF Perpetuity

    Economic Assumption at the End of the Forecast Period

    All assets sold, and all liabilities retired

    The business will be sold at the current average premium

    No value is created after the forecast period (i.e. all new

    investments return the cost of capital)

    Value is either created or destroyed indefinitely into the future DCF Perpetuity withGrowth

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    26/42

    25

    The straight perpetuity method implies that value is neither created nor destroyed after the forecast period 

    RESIDUAL VALUE (B)

      The economic assumption is that companies earning rates of return in excess of thecost of capital will attract competition that will eventually drive investment returnsdown to the cost of capital

      This implies that the average rate of return on new investments will equal the cost of capital, hence no incremental value is created for investments made beyond theforecast period. There may be growth in the business, but not in value

    Forecast Period   Residual Period

    Cost of Capital

    EconomicReturns

    Time

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    27/42

    26

    If value is neither created nor destroyed in the residual value period, then NOPAT is the basis for calculating a perpetuity residual value

      Last Forecast Year:Sales

    - Operating Expenses- Economic Depletion of Assets (Depreciation)- Cash Taxes on Operating Profit

    Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT)

    + Economic Depletion of Assets- Fixed Capital Investment- Working Capital Investment

    Operating Cash Flow

      Since incremental investments in residual period yield NPV=0, the straight perpetuityvalues a perpetual stream of the last forecast period’s NOPAT using the formula:

    Straight Perpetuity NOPATResidual Value = Cost of Capital

      Adjustments to last forecast year NOPAT may be required if it is not representative of future levels

    RESIDUAL VALUE (B)

    Investments madein residual periodhave no value impact

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    28/42

    27

    When using the straight perpetuity method, the forecast period must be chosen tocoincide with the period of time investors believe a company will create value with

    their current strategy - the value growth duration (VGD)

      This can be different than standard forecast periods, or management's assessment of their competitive advantage period

      Factors to consider when estimating the forecast period

    -   Proprietary technologies-   Patented products-   Product life cycles-   Established brands

    -   Distribution channels-   Company strategy

    FORECAST PERIOD (C)

    Source: APT!, Value Line 1Q/2000, L.E.K. Analysis

    Industry Value Growth Durations

    Value Growth DurationIndustry (Using Straight Perpetuity)

    Banking 1-5 yearsFood Products 3-10 yearsFast Foods 3-15 yearsPharmaceutical 15+ yearsBeer and Wine 2-20 yearsAirlines 3-10 years

    Industry Value Growth Durations

    Value Growth DurationIndustry (Using Straight Perpetuity)

    Banking 1-5 yearsFood Products 3-10 yearsFast Foods 3-15 yearsPharmaceutical 15+ yearsBeer and Wine 2-20 yearsAirlines 3-10 years

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    29/42

    28

    The DCF framework discounts free operating cash flows to estimate Acme’sshareholder value

    THE DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW FRAMEWORK

    Market Valueof Debt and Other 

    Obligations$10.8

    Shareholder ValueTotal

    $100.0

    (C)

    Forecast PeriodResidual Period

    CumulativePresent Valueof Cash Flow

    $32.1

    +

    +

    =

    - =

    Present Valueof Residual

    Value

    $77.6

    Non OperatingAssets

    $1.0

    Corporate Value$110.8

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 - - - - - - - -

    Residual Value$127.7

    CF CF CF CF CF1 2 3 4 5(A)

    (B)

    (D)

    (E)

    ($000)

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    30/42

    29

    You can calculate a business’ value using the “Shareholder Value” sheet 

    THE DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW FRAMEWORK

    Shareholder Value Calculator 

    Company Name:   Acme CorporationScenario:   Base CaseUnits:   $ millions

    Shareholder Value $100.0Shareholder Value Per Share $10.00

    Value Growth Duration (Years)   5Residual Value Approach or Value   NOPAT/K

    Value Drivers:   2002   2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    Historical Sales   $250.0Sales Growth (G)   12.00% 12.00% 11.00% 10.00% 9.00%

    Operating Profit Margin (P)   6.00% 7 .00% 7.00% 6 .00% 5.00%

    Operating Cash Tax Rate (T)   36.00% 36.00% 36.00% 36.00% 36.00%Incremental Fixed Capital Investment (F)   5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

    Incremental Working Capital Investment (W)   10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00%

    Cost of Capital (K)   10.46% 10.46% 10.46% 10.46% 10.46%Non-Operating Assets   $1.00 $1.00 $ 1.00 $1.00 $ 1.00Market Value of Debt   $10.80 $10.80 $10.80 $10.80 $10.80

    Number of Shares Outstanding   10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000

    Operating Cash Flows & Value:

    Sales $250.0 280.0 313.6 348.1 382.9 417.4Operating Costs 263.2 291.6 323.7 359.9 396.5

    Operating Profit 16.8 22.0 24.4 23.0 20.9

    Cash Taxes 6.0 7.9 8.8 8.3 7.5Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) 10.8 14.0 15.6 14.7 13.4

    Fixed Capital Investment 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7

    Working Capital Investment 3.0 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4

    Cash Flow (CF) 6.3 9.0 10.4 9.5 8.2

    Discount Factor 0.9053 0 .8196 0.7420 0.6717 0 .6081

    Present Value (PV) of CF 5.7 7.4 7.7 6.4 5.0

    Cumulative PV of CF 5.7 13.0 20.8 27.1 32.1

    Residual Value (NOPAT Perpetuity Method) 127.7

    PV of Residual Value 77.6Non-Operating Assets 1.0

    Corporate Value 110.8Market Value of Debt 10.8

    Shareholder Value (SHV) $100.0

    Share Price $10.00

    THE DISCOUNTED CASH F OW FRAMEWORK

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    31/42

    30

    What long-term expectations explain Acme’s $100 per share stock price? 

    Acme Corporation

    Value Driver 

    2002 Sales

    Forecast Period

    Sales Growth

    Profit Margins

    Cash Tax Rate

    Incremental FixedCapital Investment

    Incremental WorkingCapital Investment

    Cost of Capital

    Cash Flows

    $25.4M

    84.4M

    1.0M

    (10.8M)

    $100.0M

    PV Operating

    Cash Flows

    PV Residual Value

    PV Investments

    Debt and Obligations

    Shareholder Value

    $11.00

    $10.00

    Shareholder Value

    Per Share

    Stock Price

    $250.0M

    5 years

    10.8%

    5.4%

    36.0%

    5.0%

    10.0%

    10.5%

    THE DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW FRAMEWORK

    THE DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW FRAMEWORK

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    32/42

    31

    The “Sensitivity Analysis” sheet identifies the value drivers with the greatest impact on value

    THE DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW FRAMEWORK

    Sensitivity Analysis

    Company Name:   Acme Corporation

    Scenario:   Value Line

    Value Driver Value   Multiplicative Modifier 

    Additive

    Modifier Low Range High Range

    Sales Growth (G) 10.8%   10.0% 1.0% 9.8% 11.8%Operating Profit Margin (P) 5.4% 10.0% 1.0%   4.4% 6.4%Operating Cash Tax Rate (T) 36.0% 10.0% 1.0%   35.0% 37.0%

    Incremental Fixed Capital Investment (F) 5.0% 10.0% 1.0%   4.0% 6.0%Incremental Working Capital Investment (W) 10.0% 10.0% 1.0%   9 .0% 11.0%Cost of Capital (K) 10.5% 10.0% 1.0%   9 .5% 11.5%

    $ millions

    Low High Low High Low High

    Sales Growth (G) ($2.7) $3.1 ($2.7) $2.8 ($3.2) $2.3

    Op. Profit Margin (P) ($11.7) $12.8 ($23.7) $23.7 ($5.1) $42.3

    Cash Tax Rate (T) $6.6 ($7.2) $2.0 ($2.0) $2.0 ($2.0)

    Incr. Fixed Cap. (F) $0.6 ($0.6) $1.2 ($1.2) $1.2 ($1.2)

    Incr. Working Cap. (W) $1.1 ($1.2) $1.2 ($1.2) $1.2 ($1.2)

    Cost of Capital (K) $12.4 ($11.2) $13.1 ($10.7) $13.1 ($10.7)

    Multiplicative

    Sensitivity Analysis Results

    Additive Range

    Range

    Change in Shareholder Value

    Multiplicative Sensitivity

    Cost of 

    Capital (K)

    Incr. Working

    Cap. (W)

    Incr. Fixed

    Cap. (F)

    Cash Tax

    Rate (T)

    Op. Profit

    Margin (P)

    Sales Growth

    (G)

    -$15 -$10 -$5 $0 $5 $10 $15

    Change in Shareholder Value

    Additive Sensitivity

    Cost of 

    Capital (K)

    Incr. Working

    Cap. (W)

    Incr. Fixed

    Cap. (F)

    Cash Tax

    Rate (T)

    Op. Profit

    Margin (P)

    Sales

    Growth (G)

    -$30 -$20 -$10 $0 $10 $20 $30

    Change in Shareholder Value

    Range Sensitivity

    Cost of 

    Capital (K)

    Incr. Working

    Cap. (W)

    Incr. Fixed

    Cap. (F)

    Cash Tax

    Rate (T)

    Op. Profit

    Margin (P)

    Sales

    Growth (G)

    -$20 -$10 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50

    Change in Shareholder Value

    SUMMARY

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    33/42

    32

    Valuation Techniques Review 

      The goal of mergers and all other strategies is to create value

      Creating value with acquisitions is difficult

      The fundamental principle behind all acquisitions and divestitures is:

      The best way to determine whether an acquisition will add value is to ask, "Why is thistarget worth more to us than to any other bidder?”

      Only unique synergies can be reliably saved for the buyer's shareholders

      Don’t confuse valuation techniques that calculate prices with those that calculatevalues

    -  Value is what something is worth to you

    -   Price is what someone pays for it

      DCF acquisition value is the best way to ascertain an acquisition’s unique value to your company

    SUMMARY

    Find the Highest Valued Usefor All Assets

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    34/42

    33

     Appendices:

      Value Driver Reference Sheets

      Net Asset Valuation Example

      Current Multiples Example

      Transaction Multiples Example

      Proof of the Equivalence of Perpetuity Residual Value Approaches

    VALUE DRIVER REFERENCE SHEET

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    35/42

    34

    VALUE DRIVER REFERENCE SHEET

    Value Driver    Description Formula Hints

    Sales Growth(G)

    Sales growth rateanticipated during theforecast period

    Where: N = # years

    Calculate this rate using % Growth,exponent, or PV, FV keys on acalculator 

    OperatingProfit Margin(P)

    Pre-Tax Operating profitsas a percent of Sales

    Sales – Op. ExpensesSales

    Subtract economic depletion of assets in OP. Exp. (or useDepreciation as a proxy).

    Cash Tax Rate(T)

    Cash Taxes that wouldhave been paid if the firmhad no debt as a percent of Operating Profits

    T = Cash Taxes / Op. Profit

    Where Cash Taxes =+ Book Taxes- Non. Operating Taxes+ Interest Tax Shield- Incr. In Deferred Tax Liability

    Interest Tax Shield is the tax savingsresulting from Debt(Interest Expense x Tax Rate)

    The tax advantage of debt will beincluded in valuations by using theafter-tax cost of debt in the weighted

    average cost of capital. Not in cashflows.

    Incremental FixedCapital Investment(F)

    The addition to fixedcapital, over and abovemaintenance capitalexpenditure, as a percentof change in sales

    F =

    Depreciation can be used as a proxyfor Economic Depletion of Assets.

    IncrementalWorking CapitalInvestment(W)

    The addition to workingcapital as a percentage of change in sales

    Ch. In Working CapitalChange in Sales

    Where Working Capital =Operating Current Assets (-)Operating Current Liabilities

    Exclude cash not necessary for operations (add it to non-operatingassets).

    Exclude Short Term Debt.Exclude Deferred Taxes

    Future SalesLast Historical Sales(   )

    N

    1

    -1

    P =

    ( )Total CAPEX -Econ. Depl. Of AssetsChange in Sales

    W =

    VALUE DRIVER REFERENCE SHEET

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    36/42

    35

    VALUE DRIVER REFERENCE SHEET

    Value Driver Description Formula Hints

    Cost of Capital(K)

    The weightedaverage returnthat a company'sdebt and equityholders requiregiven the levelsof risk of their investments

    K = [K x %Eq] + [K x (1-T) x %Debt]

    Where:

    K = Cost of Equity= Risk-free Rate + (Beta x MRP)

    K = Cost of DebtT = Cash Tax Rate

    %Eq = Equity/(Debt + Equity)%Debt = Debt/(Debt + Equity)

    For public companies get Beta frompublished sources. Use peer groupanalysis for private firms/divisions.Betas may need to be relevered if thetarget capital structure of peers differsfrom that of the firm being valued.

    Cost of debt is the weighted average

    yield to maturity for public firms. Usecomparables or bond rating analysisfor private firms.

    %Eq and %Debt should be the firm'starget capital structure for the future.

    Use Market values for debt and equity.

    Number of ForecastPeriods (N)(Value GrowthDuration)

    The number of periods investorstoday are willingto bet the firmbeing valued willbe able to createvalue with itscurrent strategy

    Estimate qualitatively by asking howlong it would take for a company to enter the industry, emulate the strategy and"compete away" the firm's advantage.

    OR

    Estimate quantitatively by using marketsignals analysis

    Consider:

    Proprietary TechnologiesDistribution ChannelsPatented ProductsProduct Life CyclesEstablished BrandsOther Competitive Advantages

    e

    e

    d

    VALUE DRIVER REFERENCE SHEET

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    37/42

    36

    Value Driver    Description Formula Hints

    Residual Value(RV)

    The value of afirm after theforecast period(N)

    If returns = K after the fcst period:RV = NOPAT / K

    If value is created in perpetuity:

    If firm will be sold after fcst period:RV = After-tax Sale Price

    Returns equal K is almost always thebest assumption for going concerns.

    Value creation in perpetuity should onlybe used for monopolies and other instances where an advantage can never 

    be competed away.

    Don't forget to take the present value of residual value.

    Non-OperatingAssets (NOA)

    Anything that hasvalue that hasnot been

    included inWorking Capitalor cash flows

    NOA =Marketable Securities

    + Real Estate

    + Investments in Affiliates

    Use market values or recently appraisedvalues to estimate non-operating assets.

    Market Value of Debt (MVD) andother obligations

    Anything thatcould detractfrom the value of the firm to

    shareholders notreflected in cashflows

    MVD =Mkt. Value of Debt Instruments

    + Underfunded Pensions+ Environmental Liabilities

    + Litigation Liabilities

    Use market values, recently appraisedvalues or expected values to estimatemarket value of debt.

    Any time the yield to maturity is differentthan the coupon rate, book value willmisstate market value for debt.

    RV =  CFT + 1

    (K - G)

    VALUATION METHODS

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    38/42

    37

      Asset-based valuation has several advantages:

    -   Asset value data is often easy to obtain-   The calculation is theoretically simple

      However, it is not relevant for valuing going concerns and can be difficult to apply

    -   Market values for illiquid assets may be difficult to ascertain-   Book value accounts may be old-   Foreign accounting practices may make adjustments difficult

    Example: Acme

    Value = Assets - Liabilities

     Asset value can be used to estimate break-up values

    Value = Assets - Liabilities$61,480M = $72,280M - $10,800M

    COMPARABLE MULTIPLES

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    39/42

    38

    Comparable multiples analysis can be used to estimate the current value of  private companies

    Current Multiples Analysis

    Company Name:   Acme CorporationUnits:   $ thousands

    Peer Companies   Share Price

    Number of 

    Shares

    Market Equity

    Value Debt

    Corporate

    Value Sales EBITDA Earnings

    Book Equity

    Value

    Peer 1 $17.0 2,153.0   $36,601.0   $11,301.0   $47,902.0   $97,874.1 $7,487.4 $3,011.8 $20,148.6Peer 2 $12.0 13,670.0   $164,040.0   $45,001.0   $209,041.0   $308,334.4 $26,346.9 $14,706.2 $89,206.0Peer 3 $3.5 14,659.0   $51,306.5   $33,294.0   $84,600.5   $135,093. 3 $11,967.7 $4,720.1 $38,367.3Peer 4 $8.0 4,230.0   $33,840.0   $14,993.0   $48,833.0   $127,974. 3 $8,547.3 $3,495.3 $21,189.3Peer 5 $14.0 6,661.0   $93,254.0   $36,121.0   $129,375.0   $247,594. 1 $17,996.2 $7,288.8 $70,029.0

    Peer Total $379,041.5 $140,710.0 $519,751.5 $916,870.2 $72,345.5 $33,222.3 $238,940.3

    Acme Corporation   $10,800.0 $250,000.0 $14,800.0 $7,105.0 $61,480.0

    Value eight Value eight Value eight Value eight

    Peer 1 0.5   1   6.4   1   12.2   1   1.8   1Peer 2 0.7   1   7.9   1   11.2   1   1.8   1Peer 3 0.6   1   7.1   1   10.9   1   1.3   1Peer 4 0.4   1   5.7   1   9.7   1   1.6   1Peer 5 0.5   1   7.2   1   12.8   1   1.3   1

    Peer Weighted Average Average

    Implied Equity Prices $98,182.2

    Implied Corporate Prices   $108,982.2

    Peer Companies

    0.54 6.86 11.33

    Sales Multiple EBITDA Multiple P/E Multiple

    $97,401.1

    Market/Book Ratio

    $134,887.2 $101,537.5 $91,302.9 $108,201.1

    1.58

    $124,087.2 $90,737.5 $80,502.9

    TRANSACTION MULTIPLES

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    40/42

    39

    Comparable transactions can be used to calculate acquisition prices of privatecompanies

    Transaction Multiples Analysis

    Company Name:   Acme CorporationUnits:   $ thousands

    Target   Acquirer 

    Transaction

    Date

    Market Equity

    Value Debt

    Corporate

    Value Sales EBITDA Earnings

    Book Equity

    ValueTarget 1 Company 1 12/11/2002 $3,213.0 $1,344.4 $4,557.4 $6,636.9 $496.6 $228.5 $1,660.8

    Target 2 Company 2 9/20/2002 $72,387.0 $56,729.7 $129,116.7 $175,096.9 $12,010.6 $4,444.5 $34,276.8

    Target 3 Company 3 3/5/2002 $23,373.0 $8,678.0 $32,051.0 $47,183.7 $2,906.7 $1,338.2 $11,183.0

    Target 4 Company 4 10/11/2001 $1,512.0 $703.1 $2,215.1 $3,720.3 $108.4 $2.7 $751.1

    Peer Total $100,485.0 $67,455.2 $167,940.2 $232,637.9 $15,522.3 $6,013.9 $47,871.8

    Acme Corporation   $10,800.0 $250,000.0 $14,800.0 $7,105.0 $61,480.0

    Value eight Value eight Value eight Value eightTarget 1 0.7   1   9.2   1   14.1   1   1.9   1

    Target 2 0.7   1   10.8   1   16.3   1   2.1   1Target 3 0.7   1   11.0   1   17.5   1   2.1   1

    Target 4 0.6   1   20.4   0   558.1   0   2.0   1

    Peer Average Average

    Implied Equity Prices $134,569.5

    Implied Corporate

    Prices   $145,369.5

    Market/Book Ratio

    0.67 10.32 15.94 2.04

    Target  Sales Multiple EBITDA Multiple P/E Multiple

    $157,872.6 $141,902.7 $113,245.7 $125,257.0

    $168,672.6 $152,702.7 $124,045.7 $136,057.0

    VALUATION METHODS

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    41/42

    40

    The various proxies for Acme's value can be placed along a value spectrum

    Value Spectrum for Acme

    $157.8

    $141.9

    $125.3$124.1

    $113.2

    $100.0

    $97.4

    $90.7

    $80.5

    $61.4

      $ -  $  2

      0 .  0  $ 4

      0 .  0  $  6

      0 .  0  $  8

      0 .  0

      $  1  0  0

     .  0

      $  1  2  0

     .  0

      $  1 4  0

     .  0

      $  1  6  0

     .  0

      $  1  8  0

     .  0

    Trans. Sales Multiple

    Trans. EBITDA Multiple

    Trans. Mkt/Bk MultipleCurrent Sales Multiple

    Trans. P/E Multiple

    DCF Stand Alone

    Current Mkt/Bk Multiple

    Current EBITDA Multiple

    Current P/E Multiple

    Asset Value

    ($ millions)

  • 8/20/2019 LEK - Valuation Techniques

    42/42

    41

    Proof of the equivalence of perpetuity residual value approaches

    Definitions:

    CF = Cash Flow

    NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Tax

    g = Growth Rate of Cash Flows

    r = Percentage of Cash Flows Reinvested

    (Reinvestment Rate )

    ROC = Return on Capital Invested

    K = Cost of Capital

    Relationships:

    1. Cash Flow is NOPAT minus Investment

    CF = NOPAT * (1 - r)

    2. The percentage growth in Cash flows isthe percentage of Cash Flow reinvestedmultiplied by the expected return on

    investment

    g = r x ROC

    Proof:

    InsertRelationship 2

    InsertRelationship 1

    AssumeROC = K

    CFK - g

    NOPAT * (1 - r)K - (r x ROC)

    NOPAT * (1 - r)K * (1 - r)

    NOPATK

    = = =