lecture 9 – modelstoohey/lecture-9-models.pdf · lecture 9 – models atoc/chem 5151 . 2 why talk...

23
1 Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151

Upload: others

Post on 30-May-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

1

Lecture 9 – Models

ATOC/CHEM 5151

Page 2: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

2

Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to

interpret without some analysis framework • Models are useful for testing our

understanding of fundamental processes • Many journal articles include model results • Models have flaws – useful to know what

those might be

Page 3: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

3

Hierarchy of Models

• Simplest form – “box model” – Zero dimensional (0-D) – No transport (or heavily parameterized) – Single point calculation – Only one climate variable (T)

Page 4: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

4

Elements of a Box Model

From FP&P

Page 5: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

5

Elements of a Box Model

Sources: Flux in, Emission, Chemical production Sinks: Flux out, Deposition, Chemical loss Inventory: amount of X in box (also reservoir)

From Jacob text

Page 6: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

6

Page 7: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

7

Eulerian formulation

• Referenced to a fixed spatial grid point ∂N/∂t + u(∂N/∂x) = 0

• Traditional model scheme

– Fixed grids are easy to use; winds are prescribed or calculated

– Limitation is stability (diffusion and/or dispersion)

– Time step and spatial resolution tightly related

Page 8: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

8

Hierarchy of Models

• One-dimensional models (1-D) – Generally limited to vertical transport, which is

parameterized by eddy diffusion (Kzz) – Appropriate for a global-average look at

something – Column calculations of photochemistry,

radiation – “Radiative-convective” models – useful

method for calculating effects of atmospheric instability

Page 9: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

9

Hierarchy of Models

• Two-dimensional models (2-D) – Latitudinal and seaonal behavior – “Zonal averages” – Used to be the premier tool for chemistry

assessment studies (when computing power was more limited)

– Have a “closure” problem – tend to get mass accumulation or loss over time

Page 10: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

10

Grids in a 2-D model

Page 11: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

11

Hierarchy of Models

• Three-dimensional models (3-D) – Full 3-D (+ time) behavior – Come in several “flavors”

• Mechanistic – prescribe certain behaviors, to focus on others

• Off-line – active transport, chemistry done separately

• Assimilation – use observed winds, T, tracers • GCMs – self-consistent calculations • CTMs – GCM + chemistry

Page 12: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

12

Grid structure of 3-D model

Page 13: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

13

Elements of 3-D models

Page 14: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

14

Elements of 3-D models

Page 15: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

15

Lagrangian Models

• Basically follow a parcel of air as it is moved by winds – Air assumed to be homogeneous – Usually a simple scheme with no numerical

diffusion – Utility limited to short periods of time, due to

accumulating errors in parcel location

Page 16: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

16

Page 17: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

17

Semi-lagrangian scheme

• Mixture of Lagrangian and Eulerian types – Solution at grid points is derived based on a

Lagrangian calculation – Common in CTMs, but non-conservative because of

interpolation to grid-points

<v>

(x, t)

(x0, t – Δt)

Page 18: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

18

Cautions - Altitude

• This would seem to be an invariant quantity, but…. – Many models are formulated on pressure surfaces, or

use terrain-following coordinates (called σ-layers)

Page 19: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

19

Cautions - Temperature

• Some models calculate T interactively, but many (most?) use climatological T – This can matter a lot for chemistry, especially

for things that have thresholds or are very T-sensitive

• E.g., cloud formation • NO + O3, k=2.0 x 10-12 exp(-1400/T) • NO2 + O3, k=1.2 x 10-13 exp(-2450/T)

– A 5 K temperature difference change rate 20 and 36 %, respectively

Page 20: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

20

Cautions – Photolysis Rates

• Can vary tremendously from model to model – Solar flux is pretty standardized, so not much

error there – Ozone column – use climatologies, but daily

variations can be important – Presence or absence of aerosol scattering – Plane-parallel vs. fully spherical calculations

• Especially for SZA > 75

Page 21: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

21

Photolysis Rate comparisons

Page 22: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

22

Model Evaluation

• Some done on ad-hoc basis • Formal comparisons/evaluation:

– http://gmi.gsfc.nasa.gov/gmi.html

Page 23: Lecture 9 – Modelstoohey/Lecture-9-Models.pdf · Lecture 9 – Models ATOC/CHEM 5151 . 2 Why talk about models? • Atmospheric chemistry is data-rich; hard to interpret without

23

Box model practice

Water is supplied to the atmosphere by evaporation from the surface and is removed by precipitation. The total mass of water in the atmosphere is 1.3x1016 kg, and the global mean rate of precipitation to the Earth’s surface is 0.2 cm day-1. Calculate the residence time of water in the atmosphere.