lecture 5
DESCRIPTION
digital transmissionTRANSCRIPT
AWGN Channel
Digital Transmission over AWGN Channel
AWGN Channel
modulator at the transmitter performs the function of mapping the information sequence into signal waveforms.
These waveforms are transmitted over the channel, and a corrupted version of them is received at the receiver
Channels can suffer from a variety of impairments that contribute to errors.
Channel Impairments
Impairments include noise, attenuation, distortion, fading, and interference
Noise is present in all communication channels and is the major impairment in many communication systems
In this lecture we will deal with the design and performance characteristics of optimum receivers for the various modulation methods when the channel corrupts the transmitted signal by the addition of white Gaussian noise
VECTOR CHANNEL MODELS
The additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel model is a channel whose sole effect is addition of a white Gaussian noise process to the transmitted signal.
is one of M possible signals
N0/2
VECTOR CHANNEL MODELS
receiver makes the optimal decision about which message was transmitted.
the decision rule minimizes the probability of disagreement between the transmitted message m and the detected message given by
VECTOR CHANNEL MODELS
Any orthonormal basis can be used for expansion of a zero-mean white Gaussian process, and the resulting coefficients of expansion will be iid (independent and identical destribution) zero-mean Gaussian random variables with variance N0/2
Optimal Detection
AWGN vector channel is given by
where all vectors are N -dimensional real vectors
vectors are selected from a set
Optimal Detection
A posteriori probability and Likelihood function
The posterior probability is the probability of the parameters given the evidence :
In contrasts with thelikelihood function, which is the probability of the evidence given the parameters: .
The two are related as follows:
Let us have apriorbelief that theprobability distribution functionis and observations with the likelihood , then the posterior probability is defined as
.
MAP and ML Receivers
MAP receiver can be simplified to
Maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) can be written as
MAP and ML Receivers
And Receiver is called the maximum-likelihood receiver, or ML receiver
It is important to note that the ML detector is not an optimal detector unless the messages are equiprobable.
The ML detector, however, is a very popular detector since in many cases having exact information about message if probabilities are difficult.
The Decision Regions
Any detector partitions the output space into
For a MAP detector we have
The Error Probability
is symbol error probability or message error probability
E X A M P L E 4.11
Preprocessing at the Receiver
the optimal detector based on the observation of makes the same decision as the optimal detector based on the observation of r.
In other words, an invertible preprocessing of the received information does not change the optimality of the receiver.
WAVEFORM AND VECTOR AWGN CHANNELS
WAVEFORM AND VECTOR AWGN CHANNELS
the second component cannot provide any information about the transmitted signal and therefore has no effect in the detection process and can be ignored without sacrificing the optimality of the detector
Optimal Detection for the Vector AWGN Channel
The MAP detector for this channel is given by
Where
as the bias term
Optimal Detection for the Vector AWGN Channel
It can further simplified as
The receiver receives r and looks among all sm to find the one that is closest to r using standard Euclidean distance.
Such a detector is called a nearest-neighbor, or minimum-distance, detector.
Also note that in this case, since the signals are equiprobable, the MAP and the
ML detector coincide, and both are equivalent to the minimum-distance detector.
Optimal Detection for the Vector AWGN Channel
In this case the boundaries of decisions Dm and are the set of points that are equidistant from sm and , which is the perpendicular bisector of the line connecting these two signal points
Optimal Detection for Binary Antipodal Signaling
The probabilities of messages 1 and 2 are p and 1 p, respectively.
Error Probability for Equiprobable Binary Signaling
Since Q( ) is a decreasing function, in order to minimize the error probability, the distance between signal points has to be maximized.
Optimal Detection for Binary Orthogonal Signaling
which is signal-to-noise ratio per bit, or SNR per bit, or simply the SNR
Optimal Detection for Binary Orthogonal Signaling
Implementation of the Optimal Receiver for AWGN Channels
The Correlation Receiver:
MAP decision rule is given by
Correlation Receiver
Matched Filter Receiver
In correlation receiver implementations we compute quantities of the form
Matched Filter Receiver
Matched Filter Receiver
Matched Filter Receiver
OPTIMAL DETECTION AND ERROR PROBABILITYFOR BAND-LIMITED SIGNALING
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for ASK or PAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for PSK Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for QAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for ASK or PAM Signaling
The minimum distance between any two points is dmin which is given by
There are M 2 inner points and 2 outer points in the constellation
For the outer points, the probability of error is one-half of the error probability of an inner point since noise can
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for ASK or PAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for ASK or PAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for ASK or PAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for PSK Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for PSK Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for QAM Signaling
There is no advantage of the two-amplitude QAM signal set over M = 4-phase modulation.
(a) four-phase modulated signal
(b) QAM signal with two amplitude levels
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for QAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for QAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for QAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for QAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for QAM Signaling
Optimal Detection and Error Probability for QAM Signaling