lecture 4: hollywood hegemony

51
1 Lecture 4: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony Hollywood Hegemony Professor Michael Green Flying Down to Rio (1933) Directed by Thornton Freeland

Upload: yuma

Post on 17-Jan-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony. Professor Michael Green. Flying Down to Rio (1933) Directed by Thornton Freeland. Previous Lecture. “The Imperial Imaginary” Nanook of the North and Romantic Ethnography Writing about Film Lesson #2. This Lecture. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

1

Lecture 4:Lecture 4:Hollywood HegemonyHollywood Hegemony

Professor Michael Green

Flying Down to Rio (1933)Directed by Thornton Freeland

Page 2: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

2

Previous LecturePrevious Lecture

• “The Imperial Imaginary”

• Nanook of the North and Romantic Ethnography

• Writing about Film Lesson #2

Page 3: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

3

This LectureThis Lecture

• The Good Neighbor Policy and Hollywood Censorship

• Hollywood’s Imagined Latin America

• Dolores del Rio and Racialized Sexuality

• Writing about Film Lesson #3

Page 4: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

4

The Good Neighbor Policy and The Good Neighbor Policy and Hollywood Censorship Hollywood Censorship

Lecture 4: Part I

Weekend in Havana (1941)Directed by Walter Lang

Page 5: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

5

Summary of HegemonySummary of Hegemony• Hegemony refers to the way that the

political and social domination of the power class in capitalist society is expressed not only in ideologies but in all realms of culture and social organization.

• This kind of power takes the form of influence rather than domination, as well as an appearance of naturalness and inevitability that removes it from examination, criticism and challenge.

Page 6: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

6

MMPDAMMPDA• The The Motion Picture Producers and

Distributors of America (MPPDA), established in 1922, was the industry trade organization concerned with promoting self-censorship among producers in order to stave off calls for state regulation.

• The MPPDA regularly issued general guidelines for producers to follow. But no true enforcement mechanism existed.

Page 7: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

7

Will HaysWill Hays• Will Hays was

president of the MPPDA (later the MPAA) from 1922 to 1945. Because of his pervasive influence on the censorship office of the association, it was known as the Hays Office. Will Hayes

Page 8: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

8

The PCAThe PCA• The Production Code (aka the Hays

Code) was a set of industry guidelines governing the content of America movies.

• The MPPDA adopted the code in 1930, began effectively enforcing it in 1934, and abandoned it in 1967 for the MPAA film rating system, which is still in effect today.

• The Production Code determined what was and was not considered “morally acceptable” in Hollywood film production.

Page 9: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

9

Purpose of the PCAPurpose of the PCA• The PCA was developed in response to

objections by The Catholic Legion of Decency and other conservative groups to sexual content and “provocative themes” in Hollywood movies.

• By enforcing the code on their own films, Hollywood studios hoped to avoid government intervention and regulation, as well as the growing influence of the Legion of Decency and other groups on allowable film content.

Page 10: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

10

Effects of the PCAEffects of the PCA• No film could get wide distribution without

the Code’s approval, so code enforcers had great influence over movie content.

• This influence extended not only to sex and violence, but also to representations of foreign nationals.

• The PCA screened each film for possible “foreign offense” during its reviews of storylines, scripts, and finished films.

Page 11: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

11

““The Good Neighbor Policy”The Good Neighbor Policy”

• The Good Neighbor Policy developed as a result of the shared economic interests of the studios and the current geopolitical imperatives of the U.S. government.

Page 12: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

12

Profiting from the NeighborsProfiting from the Neighbors• 35 percent of the motion picture industry’s

gross revenue in the 1930s came from international box office, 60 percent of which was from Europe.

• The looming war in Europe led the studios to search for other foreign markets,

• In early 1939, all the major studios began actively producing Latin-themed ‘good neighborly’ films aimed at pleasing - and profiting from - Latin American audiences.

Page 13: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

ExamplesExamples

Page 14: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

14

The CIAAThe CIAA• At the same time the U.S. was concerned

about Nazi influence in Latin America• Nelson Rockefeller urged President

Roosevelt to align the U.S more closely with countries in the Western Hemisphere.

• Roosevelt appointed Rockefeller head of the Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs (CIAA), which was to harmonize, through propaganda, all official relations with Latin America ties for economic and political purposes.

Page 15: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

15

Movies as PropagandaMovies as Propaganda• Rockefeller created a Motion Picture

Division within the CIAA and selected John Hay Whitney as its head.

• Whitney persuaded Hollywood to begin to incorporate more Latin American talent into its movies, arguing that the film industry needed to be persuaded to create filmic representations of Latin America that would not be objectionable to Latin Americans.

Page 16: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

16

Addison DurlandAddison Durland• A number of Hollywood films were banned in

Latin America during the 1920s and early 1930s, prompting the industry to re-evaluate its representational approach.

• Whitney encouraged Hays to place Addison Durland on the staff of the PCA for his for his “Latin American point of view.”

• Durland, who had lived and worked in Cuba, was to to ensure that Hollywood movies be free from anything potentially offensive to Latin sensibilities.

Page 17: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

17

Your Author’s PointYour Author’s Point“After the turn toward the Latin American

market in 1939, Hollywood’s Good Neighbor agenda demanded a new approach, one that emphasized ‘authenticity’ and ‘realism’ [in the

hopes of] greater mutual understanding between Americans and Latin Americans, and, most importantly, greater box office

receipts for the studios.– Brian O'Neil, “The Demands of Authenticity: Addison

Durland and Hollywood's Latin Images During WWII”

Page 18: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

18

Hollywood’s Imagined Latin Hollywood’s Imagined Latin AmericaAmerica

Lecture 4: Part II

That Night in Rio (1941)Directed by Irving Cummings

Page 19: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

19

A Major EffortA Major Effort• From 1941-45, as part of the Good

Neighbor Policy, the studios produced scores of Latin-themed films, often featuring imported Latin American stars.

• In an effort to be responsive to Latin American sensibilities, studio research departments helped lend “authenticity” to films set in foreign lands, acting as ethnographic resource centers for scriptwriters and producers.

Page 20: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

20

Enforcing Western IdeasEnforcing Western Ideas• These researchers helped shape movie

imagery of other peoples and cultures through the use of picture books, tour guides, and magazines such as Colliers and National Geographic.

• These sources often depicted other regions in Western terms as “exotic” lands; consequently they were often inauthentic, colonial and racist.

Page 21: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

21

Durland’s MandateDurland’s Mandate• As part of a “sincere

crusade,” Durland’s job was to make sure that Hollywood’s Latin American content was free of all negative imagery, and he looked for “mistakes” in such elements as script, costume, props, language and casting. Carmen Miranda

Page 22: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

22

O’Neil’s ArgumentO’Neil’s Argument“Durland’s primary function was to prevent

Hollywood’s Latin-themed films from offending the Latin American censor boards, whose

members held the keys to film distribution in their respective countries. The criteria he

used to shape these films tended to conform to the image that Latin American elites liked to convey of the region: light-skinned, modern,

and civilized.” – Brian O'Neil, “The Demands of Authenticity: Addison

Durland and Hollywood's Latin Images During WWII”

Page 23: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

23

Durland’s ResultsDurland’s Results• Ironically, Durland helped construct an

unrealistic Hollywood representation of Latin America as clean, modern, prosperous and European in complexion.

• Durland’s racial censorship targeted not only depictions of blacks, but also of all darker-skinned Latin Americans. He routinely commented on skin color in script notes to studios, insisting that characters not appear too “shabby,” “swarthy,” or “negroid in color.”

Page 24: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

24

Whitening Racial RepresentationWhitening Racial Representation• In carrying out such an agenda, the need

to visually maintain racial hierarchies superseded Durland’s concern over realism and ‘authenticity.’

• As a result, a “whitening” took place in Hollywood’s Latin-themed films, in which everyone, including the background extras, appears white.

Pause the lecture and watch the first clip from That Night in Rio.

Page 25: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

25

Reinforcing Class and GenderReinforcing Class and Gender• Durland also helped enforce elite

conventions about gender and class relations in Latin America.

• While he eliminated depictions of Latin women of ill repute, insuring that Latin women exhibited ‘ladylike’ qualities onscreen, he allowed films to continue to stereotype them as fiery and tempestuous (Lupe Ve �lez and Carmen Miranda).Pause the lecture and watch clip #2 from That Night in Rio.

Page 26: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

26

Trading StereotypesTrading Stereotypes“The newer films largely replaced Latin

stereotypes of alternately docile, stupid, and villainous ‘greasers’ with new, supposedly more ‘positive,’ images of Latinos as fun-seekers, flirts, and flamboyant dancers [in

movies such as] Down Argentine Way (1940), to spend That Night in Rio (1941),

and to book a Week-End in Havana (1941).”

Brian O'Neil, “The Demands of Authenticity”

Pause the lecture and watch clip #3 from That Night in Rio.

Page 27: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

27

Contradictions in ApproachContradictions in Approach• Whatever his motivations, Durland

consistently made little or no censorial interventions in films with major Latin performers such as Lupe Velez, Carmen Miranda and Cesar Romero.

• He usually decided that they would “present no problem from the Latin American point of view.”

• He also rarely took into account the sensibilities of U.S. Latinos.

Page 28: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

28

America as SuperiorAmerica as Superior• Despite the efforts of Hollywood to

represent Latin American more positively and to promote a new sense of hemispheric solidarity, studio films nevertheless perpetuated idea that U.S culture and people were superior to their neighbors.

• Hollywood found it difficult to change the constructs of ethnicity and and national identity that it had already developed over several decades of film production.

Page 29: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

29

Durland’s CompromiseDurland’s Compromise“In the end, a compromise prevailed: the

Latin America imagined by Hollywood became more prosperous and modern than ever before, but its inhabitants symbolized

in the roles of Lupe Velez, Carmen Miranda, and Cesar Romero still functioned as subordinate entertainers . . . who, while

not the villainous brutes of old, would remain props of light entertainment,

intellectually and romantically inferior.” – Brian O'Neil, “The Demands of Authenticity: Addison

Durland and Hollywood's Latin Images During WWII”

Page 30: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

30

O’Neil’s Final PointO’Neil’s Final Point“The fictional neighbors [depicted by Hollywood] were perfectly suited to the

imperialist, yet war-weary heart of the early 1940s United States. Although lively, vivid,

and infinitely entertaining, Hollywood’s Good Neighbor is ultimately nonthreatening and

compliant under America’s tutelage.” – Brian O'Neil, “The Demands of Authenticity: Addison

Durland and Hollywood's Latin Images During WWII”

Page 31: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

31

Dolores del Rio and Racialized Dolores del Rio and Racialized SexualitySexuality

Lecture 4: Part IV

Flying Down to Rio (1933)Directed by Thornton Freeland

Page 32: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

32

Dolores Del RioDolores Del Rio• Dolores Del Rio was a Mexican actress who

became a Hollywood movie star in the 1920s and ’30s in such films as Bird of Paradise (1932), Flying Down to Rio (1933) and In Caliente (1935).

• She was considered a great beauty and in 1933 was voted by a prominent movie magazine as having the “most perfect feminine figure in Hollywood.”

Page 33: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

33

Your Author’s QuestionYour Author’s Question “Given the particular environment of social

attitudes and beliefs in the 1930s around questions of racialized sexuality, how is it that a foreign star like del Rio was elevated above popular white stars such as Irene Dunne, Fay

Wray, and Norma Shearer?”– Joanna Hershfield, “Dolores Del Rio, Uncomfortably Real:

The Economics of Race in Hollywood’s Latin American Musicals”

Page 34: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

Del Rio on TopDel Rio on Top

Fay Wray Dolores del Rio Irene Dunn

Page 35: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

35

Available RolesAvailable Roles• Mexicans were generally relegated to a

lower status in the U.S. racial hierarchy, including in the way they were represented in the movies.

• The kinds of roles available to non-white actors at the time were largely based on ethnicity and color of skin. Due to the system of Anglo-American racism of the time, light-skinned Hispanics moved in and out of ethnic roles more easily.

Page 36: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

36

Racialized CastingRacialized Casting• Actors considered ‘Spanish’ because of

hair, skin or other features had more access to roles than darker-skinned actors who were racialized in stereotypical “greaser,” bandido, or “Native” roles.

• Mexican women, such as those played by Del Rio, were generally represented as docile, sensual, and light-skinned with Spanish (European) rather than Indian or mestizo features.

Page 37: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

37

An “Acceptable” OtherAn “Acceptable” Other• Though Del Rio’s Mexican heritage made

her an “Other,” Hollywood represented her in terms of North American conceptions of femininity and female beauty, making her an “acceptable other” to audiences.

• Such conceptions of acceptable beauty included the “naturalness” of her straight hair and her traditional conservative bearing.Pause the lecture and watch clip #1 from Flying Down to Rio.

Page 38: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

38

Del Rio’s Star TextDel Rio’s Star Text

“Del Rio’s star text was distinguished by a historically situated image of an exotic foreign woman who is attracted to (and attractive to)

white men. This image was transmitted through a range of symbolic and economic

practices, which included fan and trade magazines and the popular press.”

– Joanna Hershfield, “Dolores Del Rio, Uncomfortably Real: The Economics of Race in Hollywood’s Latin American Musicals”

Pause the lecture and watch clip #2 from Flying Down to Rio.

Page 39: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

39

Justified by CapitalismJustified by Capitalism• Because the most important thing to the

studios was making money, the issues of race could be surmounted if it meant profiting from a star like Del Rio.

• Hollywood chose to negotiate cinematic representations of racialized sexuality – rather than simply avoid them – partially because of its dependence on foreign markets.

Page 40: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

40

Final PointsFinal Points “Del Rio was more than an image: she was a vessel

that circulated cultural conceptions and values between producers and consumers of popular

culture about beauty, feminine sexuality, national identity, and race. While female stars are primarily

defined along a scale of sexual desirability, the color of del Rio’s skin and her facial characteristics

marked her above all as not white.” – Joanna Hershfield, “Dolores Del Rio, Uncomfortably Real The Economics

of Race in Hollywood’s Latin American Musicals”

Page 41: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

41

Final PointsFinal Points“The case of del Rio evidences the ways in which economic and political concerns often compete with ideological ones . . . The Mexican-born star appealed to Latin American audiences while her light skin, European features, upper-class roles,

and a star text that recognized her as beautiful by U.S. standards, appeased the American public.”– Joanna Hershfield, “Dolores Del Rio, Uncomfortably Real The Economics

of Race in Hollywood’s Latin American Musicals”

.

Page 42: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

42

Writing About Film Lesson #3Writing About Film Lesson #3

Lecture 4: Part IV

In Caliente (1935) Directed by Lloyd Bacon

Page 43: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

43

Three Types of Film WritingThree Types of Film Writing

• Remember, there are three major types of film writing:

– Descriptive – a neutral account of the basic characteristics of the film.

– Evaluative – which presents a judgment or opinion about a film’s value.

– Interpretive – which presents an argument about a film’s meaning and significance.

Page 44: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

44

Summary of Descriptive WritingSummary of Descriptive Writing• As it suggests, descriptive writing describes

a film, without evaluation or judgment.

• Most descriptions of narrative films relay plot events, while a description of a documentary might describe not only the topic of the film, but also the approach.

• While descriptions do not offer judgments, they may go beyond plot summary to describe genre.

Page 45: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

45

Summary of Evaluative WritingSummary of Evaluative Writing• An evaluative claim presents a judgment,

expressing the author’s belief that the film is bad, good, mediocre, flawed, etc.

• Reviewer’s grades – A, B or C, two thumbs up, number of stars, etc. – often summarize the critic’s judgment, while a longer review lays out the specific reasons.

• “The Birth of a Nation is a great film” is an example of an evaluative claim.

Page 46: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

46

Evaluative vs. InterpretiveEvaluative vs. Interpretive• Evaluative criteria is most often seen in the

movie review, which takes a number of forms in print, on TV and on the Internet.

• Though some critics bring a sophisticated level of film discourse to the culture, their discussion of a film generally comes down to whether they think it is “good or bad,” i.e worth your time and money.

• These evaluations are often ahistorical and not very analytical.

Page 47: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

47

Interpretive WritingInterpretive Writing• An interpretive claim presents an argument

about a film’s meaning and significance.• These kind of claims address a film’s

themes and abstract ideas, its social relevance, its historical context, and its influence, among other topics.

• But they do more than identify themes; they go further, making an argument about what a film does with those themes.

Page 48: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

48

ExamplesExamples• After careful critical analysis, a viewer

might conclude that one theme in Nanook of the North relates to how people and cultures use technology.

• An interpretive claim might suggest:

– “Nanook of the North questions the notion of technological progress by showing that technology actually controls people rather than the other way around.”

Page 49: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

49

ExamplesExamples• Another theme of the film is people working

together to achieve goals. Are the themes related? Can we connect them in our claim?

• A more complex interpretive claim might be:

– “Although an over-reliance on technology proves dangerous, Nanook of the North finally assures viewers that a small group of people united by a common purpose can avoid dehumanization by the most powerful technological system.”

Page 50: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

50

The Importance of InterpretationThe Importance of Interpretation• While description and evaluation can be

helpful when deciding whether to see a film, interpretive claims are important because they seek to understand the ways in which film art produces meaning.

• Interpretive claims can be important socially and culturally.

• Finally, they can help us develop logical thinking and writing skills.

Page 51: Lecture 4: Hollywood Hegemony

51

End of Lecture 4 End of Lecture 4

Next Lecture: Classic White Women