lect_11_2014 rf circuit design

7/25/2019 Lect_11_2014 RF Circuit Design

1/61

Indraprastha Institute of

Information Technology Delhi ECE321/521

Lecture

11 Date: 11.09.2014

Scattering Parameters and Circuit Symmetry

Even-mode and Odd-mode Analysis

Generalized S-Parameters Example

T-Parameters


2/61



Q: OK, but how can we determine the scattering matrix of a device?

A: We must carefully apply our transmission line theory!

Q: Determining the Scattering Matrix of a multi-port device would seem to beparticularly laborious. Is there any way to simplify the process?

A: Many (if not most) of the useful devices made by us humans exhibit a high

degree of symmetry. This can greatly simplify circuit analysisif we knowhow to exploit it!

Q: Is there any other way to use circuit symmetry to our advantage?A: Absolutely! One of the most powerful tools in circuit analysis is Odd-Even

Mode analysis.


3/61



Circuit Symmetry One of the most powerful concepts in for evaluating circuits is that of

symmetry. Normal humans have a conceptual understanding of symmetry,based on an esthetic perception of structures and figures.

On the other hand, mathematicians (as they are wont to do) have definedsymmetry in a very precise and unambiguous way. Using a branch of

mathematics called Group Theory, first developed by the young geniusvariste Galois (1811-1832), symmetry is defined by a set of operations (agroup) that leaves an object unchanged.

Initially, the symmetric objects under consideration by Galois were

polynomial functions, but group theory can likewise be applied to

evaluate the symmetry of structures. For example, consider an ordinary

equilateral triangle; we find that itis a highly symmetric object!


4/61



Circuit Symmetry (contd.)Q: Obviously this is true. We dontneed a mathematician to tell us that!

A: Yes, but how symmetric is it? How does the symmetry of an equilateraltriangle compare to that of an isosceles triangle, a rectangle, or a square?

To determine its level of symmetry,

letsfirst label each corner as corner 1,

corner 2, and corner 3. 1

2

3

First, we note that the triangle

exhibits a plane of reflectionsymmetry: 1

2

3


5/61



Circuit Symmetry (contd.)

Thus, if we reflect the triangle across this plane we get:1

2

3

Note that although corners 1 and 3 have changed places,

the triangle itself remains unchangedthat is, it has the

same shape, same size, and same orientation afterreflecting across the symmetric plane!

Mathematicians say that these two triangles are congruent. Note that we can write this reflection operation as a permutation (an

exchange of position) of the corners, defined as:

1 3

2 2

3 1


6/61




Q: But wait! Isntthere more than just one plane of reflection symmetry?A: Definitely! There are two more:

1

2

3

1

2 3

1 2

2 1

3 3

1

2

3

1 1

2 3

3 2 1 2

3

In addition, an equilateral triangle exhibits

rotation symmetry!


7/61




Rotating the triangle 120clockwise also results in a congruent triangle:

1

2

3

1

3 2

1 22 33 1

Likewise, rotating the triangle 120 counter-clockwise results in acongruent triangle:

1

2

3

3

2 1

1 3

2 13 2


8/61



Additionally, there is one more operation that will result in a congruent

triangledo nothing!


1

2

3

2

1 3

1 1

2 2

3 3

This seemingly trivial operation is known as the identity operation,and is an element of every symmetry group.

These 6 operations form the dihedral symmetry group D3which hasorder six (i.e., it consists of six operations). An object that remains

congruent when operated on by any and all of these six operations issaid to have D3symmetry.

An equilateral triangle has D3symmetry!


9/61



By applying a similar analysis to an isosceles trapezoid, rectangle, and

square, we find that:


An isosceles trapezoid has D1 symmetry, a dihedral groupof order 2.

A square has D4symmetry, a dihedral group of order 8.D4

A rectangle has D2

symmetry, a dihedral group of order 4.D2

D1

Thus, a square is the most symmetric object of the four we havediscussed; the isosceles trapezoid is the least.

Q: Well thatsall just fascinatingbut just what the heck does this have todo with RF circuits!?!

A: Plenty! Useful circuits often display high levels of symmetry.


10/61




For example consider

these D1 symmetricmulti-port circuits:

1 2

2 1

3 4

4 3

100

50

200 200

1 2

3 4

Or this circuit with D2symmetry: which is

congruent under thesepermutations:

1 3 , 2 4 , 3 1 , 4 21 2 , 2 1 , 3 4 , 4 31 4 , 2 3 , 3 2 , 4 1

50

50

200 200

1 2

3 4


11/61



Circuit Symmetry (contd.) Or this circuit with D4 symmetry: which is congruent under these

permutations:

1 3 , 2 4 , 3 1 , 4 21 2 , 2 1 , 3 4 , 4 3

1 4 , 2 3 , 3 2 , 4 11 4 , 2 2 , 3 3 , 4 11 1 , 2 3 , 3 2 , 4 4

The importance of this can be seen when considering the scattering matrix,

impedance matrix, or admittance matrix of these networks.

50

50

50 50

1 2

3 4


12/61




For example, consider again thissymmetric circuit:

This four-port network has a

single plane of reflectionsymmetry (i.e., D1 symmetry),

and thus is congruent underthe permutation:

1 2 , 2 1 , 3 4 , 4 3

So, since (for example) 12, we find that for this circuit:

= = = must be true! Or, since 12 and 34 we find:

= = =

=

=

=

100

50

200 200

1 2

3 4


13/61




Continuing for all elements of the permutation,we find that for this symmetric circuit, the

scattering matrix must have this form:

11 21 13 14

21 11 14 13

31 41 33 43

41 31 43 33

S S S S S S S S

SS S S S

S S S S

and the impedance and admittance matrices

would likewise have this same form.

Note there are just 8 independent elements inthis matrix. If we also consider reciprocity (aconstraint independent of symmetry) we find that

= and = , and the matrix reducesfurther to one with just 6 independent elements:

11 21 31 41

21 11 41 31

31 41 33 43

41 31 43 33

S S S S

S S S S S

S S S S

S S S S


14/61




11 21 31 41

21 22 41 31

31 41 11 21

41 31 21 22

S S S S S S S S

SS S S S

S S S S

Q: Interesting. But why do we care?A: This will greatly simplify the analysis of this symmetric circuit, as weneed to determine only six matrix elements!

Or, for circuits with this D1symmetry:

1 3 , 2 4 , 3 1 , 4 2

50

50

100 200

1 2

3 4


15/61




For a circuit with D2symmetry:

we find that the impedance(or scattering, or admittance)

matrix has the form:

11 21 31 41

21 11 41 31

31 41 11 21

41 31 21 11

S S S S

S S S S

S S S S S

S S S S

Note: there are just fourindependent values!

50

50

200 200

1 2

3 4


16/61



Circuit Symmetry (contd.) For a circuit with D4symmetry: we find that the admittance (or

scattering, or impedance) matrix

has the form:

11 21 21 41

21 11 41 21

21 41 11 21

41 21 21 11

S S S S

S S S S S

S S S S S S S S

Note: there are just threeindependent values!

50

50

50 50

1 2

3 4


17/61


18/61



Circuit Symmetry (contd.) Not only can we determine from the form of the scattering matrix whether

a particular design is possible (e.g., a matched, lossless, reciprocal 3-portdevice is impossible), we can also determine the general structure of apossible solutions (e.g. the circuit must have D2symmetry).

Likewise, the anti-symmetric matched,

lossless, reciprocal four-port network mustexhibit D1symmetry!

21 31

21 31

31 21

31 21

0 0

0 00 0

0 0

S S

S SSS S

S S

Well see just what these symmetric, matched, lossless, reciprocal

four-port circuits actually are later in the course!


19/61



Example1 determine the scattering matrix of the simple two-port device shown

below:

Port-1 Port-2, ,

= 0 =

= 0

0


20/61



Symmetric Circuit Analysis200

100 100

50

+

+

Consider this D1symmetric two-port device:

Q: Yikes! The plane of reflectionsymmetry slices through two resistors.

What can we do about that?

A: Resistors are easily split into twoequal pieces: the 200 resistor into

two 100 resistors in series, and the50resistor as two 100 resistors in

parallel.

+

+

100 100

100 100

100 100

Recall that the symmetry of this2-port device leads to simplifiednetwork matrices: =


21/61



Symmetric Circuit Analysis (contd.)

Q:can circuit symmetry likewise simplify the procedure of determining theseelements? In other words, can symmetry be used to simplify circuit analysis?A: You bet!

First, consider the case wherewe attach sources to circuit in away that preserves the circuitsymmetry:

+

+

100 100

100 100

100 100

But remember! In order for symmetry to be preserved, thesource values on both sides (i.e, Vs) must be identical!


22/61




+

+

+

+

+ +

+ +

Since this circuit possesses bilateral (reflection) symmetry (12, 21),symmetric currents and voltages must be equal:

= = = =

= = = = =

Now, consider the voltages and currents within this circuit under this symmetric

configuration:

f


23/61



Symmetric Circuit Analysis (contd.)Q: Wait! This cantpossibly be correct! Look at currents and , as well ascurrents and . From KCL, this must be true:

= =

Yet you say that this must be true: = =

There is an obvious contradiction here! There is no way that both sets ofequations can simultaneously be correct, is there?

A: Actually there is! There is one solution that will satisfy both sets ofequations: = = 0 = = 0 The currents are zero!

If you think about it, this makes perfect sense!The result says that no current will flow from one

side of the symmetric circuit into the other.

I d th I tit t f


24/61



+ +

+ +

+

+

+

+

, =

Symmetric Circuit Analysis (contd.) If current did flow across the symmetry plane, then the circuit symmetry

would be destroyedone side would effectively become the sourceside,and the other the load side(i.e., the source side delivers currentto the load side).

Thus, no current will flow across the reflection symmetry plane of asymmetric circuitthe symmetry plane thus acts as a open circuit!

The plane of

symmetry thus

becomes a virtualopen!

I d th I tit t f


25/61




Q: So what?

A: So what! This means that our circuit can be split apart into two separatebut identical circuits. Solve one half-circuit, and you have solved the other!

+

+

+

+

= =

= = 0

= = 0

= =

2 = =

2

= =

200 = = 0

= = 200 = = 200

I d th I tit t f


26/61



Asymmetric Circuit Analysis Now, consider another type of symmetry, where the sources are equal but

opposite (i.e., 180 degrees out of phase).

+

+

100 100

100 100

100 100

This situation still preserves the symmetry of the circuitsomewhat.The voltages and currents in the circuit will now posses odd

symmetrythey will be equal but opposite (180 degrees out ofphase) at symmetric points across the symmetry plane.


27/61



28/61



Asymmetric Circuit Analysis (contd.)

Perhaps it would be easier to redefine the circuit variables as:

+

+

+

+

+ +

+

+

= = = =

= = = = =



29/61



Asymmetric Circuit Analysis (contd.)Q: But wait! Again I see a problem. By KVL it is evident that: =

Yet you say that = must be true!

A: Again, the solution to both equations is zero! = = 0

For the case of odd symmetry, the symmetric plane must be

a plane of constant potential (i.e., constant voltage)justlike a short circuit!



30/61



+

+

+

+

+ +

+

+

Thus, for odd symmetry, the symmetric plane forms a virtual short.


, =

This greatly simplifies things, as we can again break the circuit into two

independent and (effectively) identical circuits!



31/61




=

=

100

=

=

= 0

=

50

=

100

=

100

= 0

+

+

+

+



32/61



Odd/Even Mode Analysis

Q: Although symmetric circuits appear to be plentiful in microwaveengineering, it seems unlikely that we would often encounter symmetricsources . Do virtual shorts and opens typically ever occur?A: One wordsuperposition!

If the elements of our circuit are independent and linear, we can

apply superposition to analyze symmetric circuits when non-symmetric sources are attached.

+

+

100 100

100 100

100 100

For example, say we wish to

determine the admittancematrix of this circuit. We wouldplace a voltage source at port 1,and a short circuit at port 2aset of asymmetric sources if

there ever was one!



33/61



Odd/Even Mode Analysis (contd.)

Heres the really neat part. We find that the source on port 1 can bemodelled as two equal voltage sources in series, whereas the source atport 2 can be modelled as two equal but opposite sources in series.

+

+

+

2

2

+

+

2

2

+

0

Indraprastha Institute ofC /


34/61




Therefore an equivalentcircuit is:

100 100

100 100

100 100

Now, the above circuit (due tothe sources) is obviously

asymmetricno virtual ground,

nor virtual short is present. But,letssay we turn off (i.e., set toV =0) the bottom source oneach side of the circuit:

100 100

100 100

100 100

2

2

Our symmetry has been restored! The symmetry plane is

a virtual open.

Indraprastha Institute ofECE321/521


35/61




This circuit is referred to as its even mode, and analysis of it is known asthe even mode analysis. The solutions are known as the even modecurrents and voltages!

Evaluating the resulting evenmode half circuit we find:

100

100

1002

1 2

1

2 200 400

e es sV VI I



36/61



Now, lets turn the bottom

sources back onbut turn off thetop two!

We now have a circuit with oddsymmetrythe symmetry planeis a virtual short!


This circuit is referred to as its odd mode, and analysis of it is known as theodd mode analysis. The solutions are known as the odd mode currentsand voltages!

100 100

100 100

100 100

2

2

2

Evaluating the resulting odd mode

half circuit we find:

1 2

1

2 50 100

o os sV VI I

100

100

100



37/61



Odd/Even Mode Analysis (contd.)Q: But what good is this evenmodeand oddmodeanalysis? After all, the

source on port 1 is = , and the source on port 2 is = 0. What are thecurrents = for these sources?A: Recall that these sources are the sum of the even and odd mode sources:

and thussince all the devices in the circuit are

linearwe know from superposition that thecurrents and are simply the sum of the oddand even mode currents !

2 2

s ss

V VV First Source:

2 2

s ss

V VV Second Source:

1 1 1

e oI I I

2 2 2

e oI I I



38/61



Odd/Even Mode Analysis (contd.)100 100

100 100

100 100

= + = +

Thus, adding the odd

and even mode analysisresults together:

1 1 1400 100 80

e o s s sV V VI I I

2 2 23

400 100 400

e o s s sV V VI I I

And then the admittance parameters for this two port network is:

2

111 0

1

1 1|

80 80s

sV

s s

I Vy

V V

22

21 0

1

3 1 3|

400 400s

sV

s s

I Vy

V V

And from the symmetry of thedevice we know: 22 11

1

80y y 12 21

3

400y y

Thus, the full admittance matrix is: = 1/80 3/4003/400 1/80



39/61



Odd/Even Mode Analysis (contd.)Q: What happens if both sources

are non-zero? Can we usesymmetry then?

A: Absolutely! Consider thisproblem, where neither source isequal to zero:

100 100

100 100

100 100+

+

In this case we can define an even

mode and an odd mode source as:1 2

2

e s ss

V VV

1 2

2

o s ss

V VV

+

+

+

+

+

+



40/61

d ap ast a st tute o



We then can analyze the evenmode circuit:

100 100

100 100

100 100

And then the odd modecircuit:

100 100

100 100

100 100

And then combine these results in a linear superposition!



41/61

p


Odd/Even Mode Analysis (contd.)Q: What about current sources? Can I likewise consider them to be a sum of

an odd mode source and an even mode source?A: Yes, but be very careful! The current of two source will add if they areplaced in parallelnot in series! Therefore:

1 2

2

e s ss

I II

1 2

2

o s ss

I II

One final word (I promise!) about circuit symmetry and even/odd modeanalysis: precisely the same concept exits in electronic circuit design!

Specifically, the differential (odd) and common (even)mode analysis of bilaterally symmetric electronic circuits,such as differential amplifiers!



42/61

p


Example2

Carefully (very carefully) consider the symmetric circuit below:

4.0 = 50

= 50

50

50

5050

50

50

2

+

Use odd-even mode analysis to determine the valueof voltage .

HA#3



43/61

p


Generalized Scattering Parameters

4-portLinear

MicrowaveDevice

1 1( )V z

3 3( )V z

2 2

( )V z

4 4( )V z

Port-1

Port-4

Port-3

Port-2

3 3Pz z

4 4Pz z

2 2Pz z

1 1Pz z

04Z

03Z01Z

02Z

2 2

( )V z

1 1( )V z 3 3( )V z

4 4( )V z

Consider now this microwave network:

Boring!We studied this before; thiswill lead to the definition of

scattering parameters, right?

Not exactly. For thisnetwork, the

characteristic impedanceof each transmission line

is different(i.e., Z01Z02Z03Z04)!



44/61

p


Generalized Scattering Parameters (contd.)

Yikes! You said scattering parameters are dependenton transmission line

characteristic impedance Z0. If these values are differentfor each port,whichZ0do we use?

For thisgeneral case, we must use generalized scattering parameters!

First, we define a slightly new form of complex wave amplitudes

0

nn

n

Va

Z

0

nn

n

Vb

Z

The key things to note are:

variable a (e.g., a1,a2, ) denotes the complex amplitude of anincident (i.e., plus) wave.

a

variable b (e.g., a1,a2, ) denotes the complex amplitude of an

exiting (i.e., minus) wave.b



45/61



We now get to rewrite all our transmission lineknowledge in terms of these generalized complex

amplitudes!

First, our two propagating wave amplitudes (i.e., plus and minus) are

compactlywritten as:

0n n nV a Z 0n n nV b Z

Therefore:0( ) .

nj z

n n n nV z a Z e 0( ) .

nj z

n n n nV z b Z e

2( ) nj zn

n

n

b

az e



46/61



Similarly, the total voltage, current, and impedance at the nthport are:

0( ) . n nj z j zn n n n nV z Z a e b e 0

.( )

n nj z j z

n n

n n

n

a e b eI z

Z

.( )

.

n n

n n

j z j z

n nn j z j z

n n

a e b eZ za e b e

Assuming that our port planes are defined with znP = 0, we can

determine the total voltage, current, and impedance at port n as:

0( 0)n n n n n nV V z Z a b

0

( 0) n n

n n n

n

a bI I z

Z

( 0) n nn n

n n

a bZ Z z

a b



47/61



Similarly, the power associated with each wave is:2 2

02 2

n n

n

n

V aP

Z

2 2

02 2

n n

n

n

V bP

Z

As such, the power delivered to port n (i.e., the power absorbed by port

n) is: 2 2

2

n n

n n n

a bP P P

So whats the big deal? This is yet

another way to express transmissionline activity.

Do we reallyneed to know this, or isthis simply a strategy for making the

next quiz even harder?



48/61



You may have noticed that this notation (an, bn) provides descriptions that

are a bit cleanerand more symmetric between current and voltage. However, the main reason for this notation is for evaluating the

scattering parameters of a device with dissimilar transmission lineimpedance (e.g., Z01Z02Z03Z04).

For these cases we must use generalized scattering parameters:

0

0

nmmn

n m

ZVS

V Z

when Vk

+(zk) = 0 for all k n)



49/61



1 1( )V z

2 2( )V z

2 2( )V z1 1( )V z

2-PortNetwork

01 50Z 02 50Z

Port-1 Port-2

Here, Z01

= Z02

221

1

VS

V

when, V2

+= 0

1 1( )V z 2 2( )V z

2 2( )V z1 1( )V z

2-PortNetwork

01 50Z 02 75Z

Port-1 Port-2Here, Z01 Z02

221

1

VS

V

when, V

2

+= 0

Instead 221

1

50

75

VS

V

when, V2

+= 0



50/61


Generalized Scattering Parameters (contd.) Note that the generalized scattering parameters can be more compactly

written in terms of our newwave amplitude notation:

0

0

nm m

nm

n

n

m

Z

a

V

V Z

bS

when ak = 0 for all k n)

Remember, this is the generalizedform of scatteringparameteritalways provides the correct answer,

regardless of the values of Z0mor Z0n!

But why cant we define the scattering parameter as Smn =Vm

/Vn+

,regardless of Z0mor Z0n?? Who says we must define it with those awfulZ0nvalues in there?


f ECE321/521


51/61



Recall that a lossless device will alwayshave aunitary scatteringmatrix. As a result, the scattering parameters of a lossless device

will alwayssatisfy, for example:2

1

1N

mn

m

S

This is true only if

generalized scatteringparameters are used

The scattering parameters of a lossless

device will form a unitary matrix onlyifdefined as Smn= bm/an. If we use Smn=

Vm

/Vn+

, the matrix will be unitary onlyifthe connecting transmission lines have thesamecharacteristic impedance.


I f ti T h l D lhi ECE321/521


52/61


Do we really careif the matrix of a lossless device is unitary or not?


Absolutely!we do!

lossless device unitary scattering matrix

This relationship is a very powerful one. It allows us to

identifylossless devices, and it allows us to determineifspecific lossless devices are even possible!




53/61


Example3 lets consider a perfect connectoran electrically very small two-port

device that allows us to connect the ends of different transmission linestogether.

Determine the S-matrix of this ideal connector:

1. First case: it connects two transmission lines with same characteristic

impedance of .2. Second case: it connects two transmission lines with characteristic

impedances of and respectively.

HA#3




54/61


Shifting of Planes It is not often easy or feasible to match network ports for determination

of S-parameters in such a situation S-parameters are determinedthrough transmission lines of finite length

Let us consider a 2-port network to understand these situations

1 1( 0)inV z V

1 1

1 1 1( ) j l

inV z l V e

1 1( 0)inV z V

1 1

1 1 1( ) j l

inV z l V e

We can similarly define wave

functions on the output




55/61


Shifting of Planes (contd.)

The equations can be combined to form following matrix

1 1

2 2

1 1

22

( )

( )

0

0

in

out

j l

j l

V l

V l Ve

Ve

Links the incident waves at

the network ports shifted by

TL segments

1 1

2 2

1 1

22

( )

( )0

0in

out

j l

j l

V l

V l Ve

Ve

Links the incident waves atthe network ports shifted by

TL segments

We can also deduce that S-parameters are linked to the generalized

coefficients anand bn (which in turn can be expressed through voltages)

through following expressions (if we assume Z01= Z02)

11 12

21 22

1

2 2

1V

V

V

S V

S S

S




56/61


Shifting of Planes (contd.) Simplification of these three matrix expression results in:

1 1 1 1

2 22 2

11 12

21

1

22

1

2 2

( )( )

( )

0

00)

0

(

j lin

ou

j l

in

ou

l

l

t

j

t

j

VS S

S S

e

e

e

e

V l l

V lV l

S-parameters of the shifted network [S]SHIFT

1 1 2 2

1 1

1

2 2 2 2

1 ( )

(

11 12

21 2

2

2

2)

SH

j l

j l l

j l

FT

l

Ij lS e

e

S

S eS

e

S

Physical Meaning

The first term (S11) reveals that we have to take into account twice the traveltime for the incident voltage to reach port-1 and, upon reflection, return to

the end of the TL segment. Similarly for S22at port-2. The cross terms (S12and S21) require additive phase shifts associated with TL segments at port-1

and port-2




57/61


The Transmission Matrix

If a network has two ports, then we can alternatively define the

voltages and currents at each port as:

2V

1I

1V

2I

2-Port

NetworkInput

Port

Output

Port

For such a network, we can relate the input port parameters (I1and

V1)and output port parameters (I2and V2)using transmission

parametersalso known as ABCD parameters

1 2 2V AV BI

1 2 2I CV DI

21

21

A B V

I

V

C DI

TransmissionMatrix T




58/61


The Transmission Matrix (contd.)

Similar to the impedance and admittance matrices, we determine the

elements of the transmission matrix using shortsand opens.

Note when I2= 0 then: V1=AV21

2

VA

V A is unitless (i.e., it

is a coefficient)

Note when V2= 0 then: V1=BI21

2

VBI

B has unit ofimpedance (i.e.,

Ohms)

Note when I2= 0 then: I1=CV21

2

IC

V

C has unit of

admittance (i.e.,mhos)

Note when V2= 0 then: I1=DI21

2

ID

I D is unitless (i.e., it

is a coefficient)




59/61



Crying out loud! We already havethe impedance matrix, the

scattering matrix, andthe

admittance matrix. Why do weneed the transmission matrix?Is it

somehowuniquelyuseful?




60/61

Information Technology Delhi


Let us consider the case where a 2-port network is created by connecting

(i.e., cascading) two networks:

T

TA TB

1I

1V

21

21

V V

II

AT

32

32

B

V V

I I

T 3

3

1

1

V

I

V

I

T




61/61

Information Technology Delhi


Combining the first two equations we get:3

1

21

32

B

VV

I

V

I I

A A

T T T

Combining this combined relationship to the third we get:

2

1 3

1

32

3 3

B

V VV

II I

V

I

A AT T T T

Similarly, for N cascaded networks, the total transmission matrix Tcanbe determined as the product of all N networks!

Note this result is only true for the transmission matrix T. No equivalentresult exists for S ,Z ,Y !

2 3 N n

n =

= T T T T = T

BAT = T T

Thus, the transmission matrix can greatly simplify the analysis of complex

networks constructed from two-port devices. We find that the T matrix is

lect_11_2014 rf circuit design

Documents