lect 8 engineering ethics
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
1/50
Ethics in Engineering
Concepts and Cases
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
2/50
Introduction
What do we mean by Ethics?
a body of moral principles
Standards, rules and guidelines
Socially approved conduct
istinguished from matters of legality
! set of rules and behaviors
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
3/50
Professional Ethics
Who ecides?
Standards adopted by "rofessional
#ommunity
$E%, &'E,!S%E, etc( %ay conflict with personal ethics
#ase studies used to set e)amples,
standards
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
4/50
$E% *ules of "ractice1. Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of th
public.
a+ $f engineers -udgment is overruled under circumstances that endangelife or property, they shall notify their employer or client and such otheauthority as may be appropriate(
b+ Engineers shall approve only those engineering documents that are inconformity with applicable standards(
c+ Engineers shall not reveal facts, data or information without the prior
consent of the client or employer e)cept as authori.ed or re/uired bylaw or this #ode(
d+ Engineers shall not permit the use of their name or associate inbusiness ventures with any person or firm that they believe areengaged in fraudulent or dishonest enterprise(
e+ Engineers having 0nowledge of any alleged violation of this #ode shalreport thereon to appropriate professional bodies and, when relevant,also to public authorities, and cooperate with the proper authorities infurnishing such information or assistance as may be re/uired(
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
5/50
2. Engineers shall perform services only in the areas of
their competence.
a+ Engineers shall underta0e assignments only when /ualifiedby education or e)perience in the specific technical fields
involved(
b+ Engineers shall not affi) their signatures to any plans or
documents dealing with sub-ect matter in which they lac0
competence, nor to any plan or document not prepared
under their direction and control(
c+ Engineers may accept assignments and assume
responsibility for coordination of an entire pro-ect and sign
and seal the engineering documents for the entire pro-ect,provided that each technical segment is signed and sealed
only by the /ualified engineers who prepared the segment(
$E% *ules of "ractice
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
6/50
$E% *ules of "ractice
3. Engineers shall issue public statements only in an objectiveand truthful manner.
a+ Engineers shall be ob-ective and truthful in professionalreports, statements, or testimony( 1hey shall include allrelevant and pertinent information in such reports, statements,or testimony, which should bear the date indicating when itwas current(
b+ Engineers may e)press publicly technical opinions that arefounded upon 0nowledge of the facts and competence in thesub-ect matter(
c+ Engineers shall issue no statements, criticisms, or arguments
on technical matters that are inspired or paid for by interestedparties, unless they have prefaced their comments bye)plicitly identifying the interested parties on whose behalfthey are spea0ing, and by revealing the e)istence of anyinterest the engineers may have in the matters(
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
7/50
$E% *ules of "ractice4. Engineers shall act for each employer or client as faithful agents
or trustees.
a+ Engineers shall disclose all 0nown or potential conflicts of interestthat could influence or appear to influence their -udgment or the
/uality of their services(b+ Engineers shall not accept compensation, financial or otherwise,
from more than one party for services on the same pro-ect, or forservices pertaining to the same pro-ect, unless the circumstancesare fully disclosed and agreed to by all interested parties(
c+ Engineers shall not solicit or accept financial or other valuableconsideration, directly or indirectly, from outside agents inconnection with the wor0 for which they are responsible(
d+ Engineers in public service as members, advisors, or employees ofa governmental or /uasi2governmental body or department shallnot participate in decisions with respect to services solicited orprovided by them or their organi.ations in private or publicengineering practice(
e+ Engineers shall not solicit or accept a contract from a governmentalbody on which a principal or officer of their organi.ation serves as amember(
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
8/50
IEM Rules of Practice5. Engineers shall avoid deceptive acts.
a+ Engineers shall not falsify their /ualifications or permitmisrepresentation of their or their associates/ualifications( 1hey shall not misrepresent or e)aggeratetheir responsibility in or for the sub-ect matter of priorassignments((
b+ Engineers shall not offer, give, solicit or receive, eitherdirectly or indirectly, any contribution to influence theaward of a contract by public authority, or which may bereasonably construed by the public as having the effectof intent to influencing the awarding of a contract( 1hey
shall not offer any gift or other valuable consideration inorder to secure wor0( 1hey shall not pay a commission,percentage, or bro0erage fee in order to secure wor0,e)cept to a bona fide employee or bona fide establishedcommercial or mar0eting agencies retained by them(
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
9/50
IEM Professional Obligations
3( Engineers shall be guided in all their relations by the highest
standards of honesty and integrity(4( Engineers shall at all times strive to serve the public interest(
5( Engineers shall avoid all conduct or practice that deceivesthe public(
6( Engineers shall not disclose, without consent, confidential
information concerning the business affairs or technicalprocesses of any present or former client or employer, orpublic body on which they serve(
7( Engineers shall not be influenced in their professional dutiesby conflicting interests(
8( Engineers shall not attempt to obtain employment oradvancement or professional engagements by untruthfullycritici.ing other engineers, or by other improper or/uestionable methods(
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
10/50
IEM Professional Obligations9( Engineers shall not attempt to in-ure, maliciously or
falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation,prospects, practice, or employment of other engineers(Engineers who believe others are guilty of unethical orillegal practice shall present such information to theproper authority for action(
:( Engineers shall accept personal responsibility for theirprofessional activities, provided, however, that Engineersmay see0 indemnification for services arising out of theirpractice for other than gross negligence, where theEngineers interests cannot otherwise be protected(
;( Engineers shall give credit for engineering wor0 to thoseto whom credit is due, and will recogni.e the proprietaryinterests of others(
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
11/50
Social Contract
ServicePromoting well being of general public
Ensuring competence of professionals
SelfRegulationCreate and enforce high standards
!utonom"
#ou are the professional
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
12/50
Responsible Engineering
$hat we do matters a great deal!ccidents are costl"
Public health at sta%e
Environmental impact Minimal legal standards
!c%nowledgement of fault
!bove and be"ond call of dut"
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
13/50
Introduction to Moral &hin%ing
E'perience education( wor%( relationships Personal and Common Moralit" religion(
famil"
Ethical Sensitivities
)uestions
Problems
!nal"sis
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
14/50
&ests in Moral Problem Solving
Prudence Is it *ustified because it is in our own best interest+
Cost , -enefit
Is the most economic decision the most moral+
.olden Rule
/do unto others01
Rights
2reedom( wellbeing( moral( legal( laws3ust because it is legal( is it right+
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
15/50
4onest"( &ruth( Reliabilit"
!ccurate and complete technical %nowledge5nreliable *udgment worse than none at all
6"ing
7eliberate deception
2ailure to see% truth
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
16/50
Problem Solving in Engineering Ethics
State the "roblem
iewpoints
=ormulate 'pinion
ualify
*ecommendation
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
17/50
State the Problem
Clearl" define e'act nature of ethical problemor dilemma
8eed to be clear so that we can anticipate the
%ind of solution that is re9uired
$ant to provide an answer that is relevant to
the interests at sta%e:
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
18/50
.et the 2acts
$ant to ma%e an informed decision:
Must possess and understand the relevant
facts
Must ma%e clear an" interpretations of factual
matters or the values than underlie conflicting
moral viewpoints:
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
19/50
Identif" ; 7efend Competing Moral
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
20/50
2ormulate an Opinion
!s engineers we do not have the lu'ur" ofpostponing 9uestions or leaving a 9uestion
unresolved
7ecide which of the compelling viewpoints is the
most compelling
&he committee approach =voting> is advantageous
because the decision is representative of the
general public
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
21/50
)ualif" the Opinions or
Recommendation Committees must 9ualif" the recommendations
the" ma%e b" describing the level of consensus
that was received Should include the voting distribution and an"
dissenting opinions
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
22/50
Case Studies
Engineering ethics is often times best
e'plained through the use of case studies:
Case studies allow e'amples of good and
bad decision ma%ing in a real world conte't:
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
23/50
Credit for Engineering $or%
Introduction
Engineer ! is designing a bridge as part ofan elevated highwa" s"stem
Engineer - is as%ed to help with the designand helps design critical elements of thebridge:
Engineer ! enters the bridge design into anational competition and wins( but fails tocredit Engineer - for her part in the design:
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
24/50
Credit for Engineering $or%
)uestion
$as it ethical for Engineer ! to fail to give
credit to Engineer - for her part in the
design+
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
25/50
Credit for Engineering $or%
Code of Ethics References
Issue public statements only in an objective and truthfulmanner.Engineers shall be objective and truthful in
professional reports, statements or testimony. They shallinclude all relevant and pertinent information in suchreports, statements or testimony.
Engineers shall avoid all conduct or practice which is likelyto discredit the profession or deceive the public.
Engineers shall not accept financial or otherconsiderations, including free engineering designs, frommaterial or equipment suppliers for specifying their
product.Engineers shall, whenever possible, name the person or
persons who may be individually responsible for designs,inventions, writings, or other accomplishments.
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
26/50
Credit for Engineering $or%
7iscussion
/-asic to engineering ethics is the responsibilit" to
issue statements in an ob*ective and truthful manner
=Section ?:@:> &he concept of providing credit for
engineering wor% to those to whom credit is due isfundamental to that responsibilit": &his is particularl"
the case where an engineer retains the services of
other individuals because the engineer ma" not
possess the education( e'perience and e'pertise toperform the re9uired services for a client:1
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
27/50
Credit for Engineering $or%
7iscussion( continued
/$hile each individual case must be understood
based upon the particular facts involved( webelieve that Engineer ! had an ethical
obligation to his client( to Engineer - as well as
to the public to ta%e reasonable steps to identif"
all parties responsible for the design of the
bridge:1
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
28/50
Credit for Engineering $or%
Conclusion
/It was unethical for Engineer ! to fail to give
credit to Engineer - for his part in the design:1
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
29/50
!n EngineerAs Right to Protest
Introduction Bim wor%s as an engineer for a civil engineering
contractor reviewing the wor% of subcontractors:
Bim discovers that certain subcontractors havemade submissions with e'cessive cost( time
dela"s or substandard wor%
Bim advises management to re*ect these *obs and
re9uire subcontractors to correct the problem
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
30/50
!n EngineerAs Right to Protest
Introduction( continued
!fter an e'tended disagreement about the
subcontractorAs wor%( management places a
warning in BimAs file and places Bim on
probation( warning of future termination
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
31/50
!n EngineerAs Right to Protest
)uestion
7oes Engineer ! have an ethical obligation(
or an ethical right( to continue his efforts to
secure change in the polic" of his emplo"erunder these circumstances( or to report his
concerns to proper authorit"+
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
32/50
!n EngineerAs Right to Protest
Code of Ethics References
"Engineers shall at all times recognie that their primary
obligation is to protect the safety, health, property, and welfare
of the public. If their professional judgment is overruled under
circumstances where the safety, health, property, or welfare of
the public are endangered, they shall notify their employer orclient and such other authority as may be appropriate."
"Engineers shall not complete, sign, or seal plans and!or
specifications that are not of a design safe to the public health
and welfare and in conformity with accepted engineering
standards. If the client or employer insists on such
unprofessional conduct, they shall notify the proper authorities
and withdraw from further service on the project."
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
33/50
!n EngineerAs Right to Protest
7iscussion
/4ere the issue does not allege a danger to public health
or safet"( but is premised upon a claim of unsatisfactor"
plans and the un*ustified e'penditure of public funds:1
/!s we recognied in earlier cases( if an engineer feels
strongl" that an emplo"erDs course of conduct is
improper when related to public concerns( and if the
engineer feels compelled to blow the whistle to e'pose
the facts as he sees them( he ma" well have to pa" the
price of loss of emplo"ment:1
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
34/50
!n EngineerAs Right to Protest
7iscussion( continued
/$e feel that the ethical dut" or right of the engineer
becomes a matter of personal conscience( but we are
not willing to ma%e a blan%et statement that there is an
ethical dut" in these %inds of situations for the engineerto continue his campaign within the compan"( and ma%e
the issue one for public discussion: &he Code onl"
re9uires that the engineer withdraw from a pro*ect andreport to proper authorities when the circumstances
involve endangerment of the public health( safet"( and
welfare:1
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
35/50
!n EngineerAs Right to Protest
Conclusion
/Engineer ! does not have an ethical obligation to
continue his effort to secure a change in the polic"
of his emplo"er under these circumstances( or toreport his concerns to proper authorit"( but has an
ethical right to do so as a matter of personal
conscience:1
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
36/50
$ithdrawal of Offer
Peter( an unemplo"ed graduate engineer who recentl"received certification as an .raduate Engineer( is
see%ing emplo"ment with a consulting firm: Peter is
contacted b" Engineer !( a principal with a large
consulting firm: !fter a long discussion including
such matters as wor%ing conditions( salar"( benefits(
etc: Engineer ! offers and Peter accepts a position
with the firm: Peter cancels several additional *obinterviews with other individuals:
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
37/50
$ithdrawal of Offer
&wo da"s later( in a meeting with other principalsof the firm( it was agreed b" the firmDs
management( including Engineer !( that the
vacanc" should be filled b" an engineering
technician: 8ot until a wee% and a half later did
Engineer ! contact Peter and rescind the firmDs
offer:
7id the actions of Engineer ! in his relations withSmith constitute unethical conduct+
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
38/50
$ithdrawal of Offer
7iscussion
Engineers should be faithful to emplo"er:
Emplo"er should disclose full" all information to
emplo"ees on wor%ing conditions and other conditionsof emplo"ment:
/3ust as a prospective engineer emplo"ee has an
obligation to act in good faith with a potential emplo"er(
an engineer emplo"er owes a dut" to deal honestl"(
fairl" and openl" with a prospective engineer
emplo"ee:1
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
39/50
$ithdrawal of Offer Engineer ! %nowingl" made commitments to Peter which were
relied and acted upon b" Peter:
Engineer !( as a principal in the firm( %new or should have
%nown all necessar" facts and circumstances involved in filling
the vacanc" in the firm:
Engineer ! let a wee% and a half pass before informing Peter that
the offer had been rescinded:
&he actions of Engineer !( in his relations with Peter( constituted
unethical conduct:
2urthermore( the involvement of all the principals of the firm( in
connection with the withdrawal of the emplo"ment offer(
constituted unethical conduct:
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
40/50
EngineerDs 7ispute $ith Client Over 7esign
Client hires Engineer ! to design a particular pro*ect: Engineer !develops what he believes to be the best design and meets with theclient to discuss the design: !fter discussing the design plans andspecifications( the client and Engineer ! are involved in a disputeconcerning the ultimate success of the pro*ect:
&he client believes Engineer !Ds design is too large and comple'and see%s a simpler solution to the pro*ect:
Engineer ! believes a simpler solution will not achieve the resultand could endanger the public:
&he client demands that Engineer ! deliver over to him thedrawings so that he can present them to Engineer - to assistEngineer - in completing the pro*ect to his li%ing:
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
41/50
EngineerDs 7ispute $ith Client Over
7esign
&he client is willing to pa" for the drawings( plans(
specifications( and preparation but will not pa" until Engineer
! delivers over the drawings:
Engineer ! refuses to deliver the drawings:
)uestion $ould it be ethical for Engineer ! to deliver over the
plans and specifications to the client+
EngineerDs 7ispute $ith Client Over 7esign
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
42/50
EngineerDs 7ispute $ith Client Over 7esign
Engineer ! has an ethical obligation to the public good:
&his obligation assumes that Engineer ! is in possession of verifiable facts or
evidence which would substantiate a charge that an actual danger to the public
health or safet" e'ists:
In this case( Engineer ! ma%es the overl" broad assumption that if he were to
deliver over to the client the drawings so that the client can present them to
Engineer - to assist Engineer - in completing the pro*ect to the clientDs
li%ing( Engineer - would develop a set of plans which would endanger the
public health and safet":
Such an assumption is illfounded:
In reviewing the conduct of Engineer ! ( Engineer ! went as far as he was
ethicall" re9uired to go in preparing what he believed was the best design for
the pro*ect and in informing the client of the dangers of proceeding with the
clientDs simplified solution:
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
43/50
EngineerDs 7ispute $ith Client Over 7esign
In the event( however( that Engineer ! does deliver over to the
client the plans so that the client can present them to Engineer -for completion of the pro*ect to the clientDs li%ing( and thereafter
Engineer ! discovers that Engineer - developed plans which
constitute a danger to the public( certain actions would then be
re9uired b" Engineer !:
!n" verifiable conduct on the part of Engineer - which indicates
that Engineer -Ds plans are a danger to the public( should be
brought to the attention of the proper authorities( i:e:( the
responsible professional societies or the state engineering
registration board: !nswer It would be ethical under the above circumstances for
Engineer ! to deliver over the plans and specifications to the
client:
E i i 7i t
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
44/50
Engineering 7isaster&he 2ord Pinto Case
/not to weigh an ounce over
FGGG pounds and not to cost a
cent over HFGGG:1
6ee Iacocca
Crash tests reveal defect in gas
tan%
Rearend collisions over F mph
resulted in rupture and e'plosion
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
45/50
Cost Benefit Analysis The Ford Pinto Scandal
Safet" problems Rear end shunt J rupture of fuel tan% J fire
Spotted during design and manufacture
H?? at manufacture stage would have fi'ed problems
Refused on KCost-enefitA anal"sis
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
46/50
2ord Pinto 7esign Methodolog"
Cost-enefit !nal"sis of 7angerous 7esign!ccording to 2ord( the unsafe design would
cause ?LG -urn 7eaths
?LG Serious burn in*uries
F?GG -urned vehicles per "ear
2ord assumed it would have to pa"
HFGG(GGG per death HN(GGG per in*ur"
HNGG per vehicle
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
47/50
2ord Pinto 7esign Cost !nal"sis
Cost-enefit !nal"sis of 7angerous 7esign
!n alteration would cost H??:GG per car:
Cost to ma%e safe cars
?F: million cars ' H?? H?@N million
-enefits
?LG 7eaths( ?LG In*ured( F?GG -urned Cars
H Q: million
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
48/50
Cost -enefit !nal"sis &he 2ord Pinto Scandal
?QN??QNL 5pto GG deaths caused b" Pinto fires
7eath to serious in*ur" ratio actuall" much higher
=??G> Q would have survived with a better design
H alternative was actuall" available
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
49/50
2ord Pa"s
6awsuits and personal in*ur" cases total over HGmillion even as 2ord continues to argue the carwas safe if driven correctl"
Over GG documented deaths related to rearendcollisions in Pintos
Compan" nearl" folds after lawsuits and lac% oftrust in 2ord products
-
7/21/2019 Lect 8 Engineering Ethics
50/50
Pinto 7ebate
$ho is to blame for 2ordAs design+
Chairman( Engineer( 7esigner
$as the decision ma%ing unethical+
Is costbenefit anal"sis a reliable ethics
techni9ue+