learning session - children's safety network (csn) › sites... · 2017-10-03 · 3 welcome!...
TRANSCRIPT
1
October 3, 2017
Learning Session
Call (866) 835-7973 to join us
2
Tips
Mute yourself when you’re not talking
This webinar is being recorded
We want to hear you!
Call (866) 835-7973
Ask questions in the chat at any time
Find resources in
the link pod
3
Welcome!Agenda Welcome
Progress to Date Jen Leonardo, CS CoIIN Improvement Advisor
Awards Ceremony: Recognizing Achievement in the CS CoIIN
Back to the Essentials: Testing Small
Jane Taylor, CS CoIIN Improvement Advisor
Conclusions Jennifer Allison, Director, Children’s Safety Network
Best PDSA
Most Consistent and Highest Quality Monthly Report
Favorite Storyboards
Greatest Systems Change/Innovation
Most Likely to Have Significant Impact
0 to 60 Accelerating Change
Jennifer Allison, Director, Children’s Safety NetworkBethany Miller, Health Resources and Services Administration
4
Opening Remarks from HRSA
Bethany MillerDirector of Injury and Violence Prevention Programs
HRSA
5
Progress To DateJen Leonardo, Improvement Advisor
6
Where we are on the engine
You Are Here
(possibly for the second
time)
7
Progress Scale Rating for Strategy Teams
37% 6%
46%
63%
54%
46%
6%
11%
14%
17%
3%
6%
17%
14%
9%
14% 14%
20%
3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17
1: Forming 1.5: Focusing 2: Partnering
2.5: Testing 3: Submitting 3.5: Progress
4: Improvement 4.5: Increasing Improvement 5: Significant Improvement
8
Massachusetts SSHP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17
% health care sites implementing universal screening for suicide risk
rate
9
Massachusetts SSHP
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Feb
-16
Mar
-16
Ap
r-1
6
May
-16
Jun
-16
Jul-
16
Au
g-1
6
Sep
-16
Oct
-16
No
v-16
Dec
-16
Jan
-17
Feb
-17
Mar
-17
Ap
r-1
7
May
-17
Jun
-17
Jul-
17
Au
g-1
7
Sep
-17
Oct
-17
No
v-17
Dec
-17
Jan
-18
TEXTLINE
Text Conversations
Unique Indv Served
Goal = 334/month
10
Lessons We’ve Learned
In-person learning sessions accelerate project planning and
learning
90-Aim statements are useful, and we
need a place to house them
One-on-one TA for measurement is
helpful, especially in the first quarter
The QI Corner and Populations and Settings calls are great places for
cross topic sharing
11
Cross Team Sharing:Child Passenger Safety
• Indiana, Vermont, Kentucky, and Floridaworking to identify and improve
• The number of CPSTs in each county
• The number and geographic distribution of master CPST trainers
• The number of Mobile Fitting Stations for each county
• Which counties are “high risk” or higher risk than others
Optimizing and strengthening
car seat inspection systems
• Vermont is planning booster bash events
• Texas has identified an electronic inspection form app and is looking to expand its use statewide
• The Northern Mariana Islands is considering a different approach to increasing submissions of inspection forms, potentially avoiding costly and ineffective events (Indiana’s data pointed to this, and Kentucky confirmed it anecdotally)
Taking inspiration from
Indiana
12
Cross Team Sharing: Falls Prevention
• Massachusetts shared their model sport concussion policy with Tennessee, helping them get further down the road faster
• Massachusetts and Tennessee are sharing lessons learned on return to learn policies
Sharing Model Policies
• Tennessee and Pennsylvania are testing approaches to work with non-school sports. Nebraska is providing input (despite not being a member of the falls team)
Reaching out to Non-
Schools Sports
13
Cross Team Sharing: Interpersonal Violence Prevention
• Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, and Tennessee are sharing notes on approached and best practices for AHT prevention in hospitals
• Nebraska shared their innovative Crying Plan materials
Abusive Head
Trauma Prevention
• Indiana is developing and will share an app with resources and information for hospital-based violence intervention and prevention programs
• New Hampshire shared their free, on-line module for child maltreatment prevention (despite not being an active member of the team)
E-Learning
14
Cross Team Sharing: Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention
• Massachusetts, Vermont, and Texas are sharing lessons learned about expanding Zero Suicide, and implementing and evaluating it’s components
Evaluating and
Implementing Zero Suicide
• Missouri, Florida, and Texas are sharing ideas and experiences to expand in-school programs, track mandatory training, and improve screening and referral processes
• Missouri, Florida and Massachusetts shared resources lists and information provided to schools who want to set up and implement suicide prevention programs
Expanding Programs in
Schools
Focusing
the work
• Connecticut is reviewing call center data from January through
March 2017 to identify tests of change to reduce the number of
dropped calls
• Virginia reviewed data to identify a gap in mental health
professionals’ knowledge of BPs in suicide prevention
15
Cross Team Sharing:Teen Driver Safety
•Wisconsin has developed and shared literature reviews about drivers education and health care provider education for TDS
Sharing Evidence
•Texas, Tennessee, Nebraska, and Florida are sharing notes on their different approaches that are resulting in more signed parent teen driver agreements
Increasing Parent Teen
Driver Agreements
•New Hampshire launched and shared an on-line toolkit for parents and peer-to-peer education
•North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Kentucky, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire are sharing lessons learned from approaching schools, evaluating programs, and emerging challenges they see
•Tennessee is providing technical assistance to Texason their implementation of CheckPoints
Expanding and
Evaluating School-Based
Programs
16
Cross Topic Team Sharing
• FP (sport concussion policies), SSHP (training policies), IPVP, and TDS teams are discussing
• Gathering information from schools
• Tracking mandated trainings
• Implementing and changing school-based programs
• Getting buy-in from schools
Working with schools
• SSHP (Texas and Kentucky) and CPS (Vermontand Indiana) are discussing ways to expand CFR membership, and improve the review process
Improving CFR processes and composition
• Falls (FL and PA), IPVP (MN and NH), and CPS (CNMI) are working with home visitors to increase their ability to identify and mitigate risks in and around the home
Working with Home Visitors
17
In Your Words“Focus on the
importance of data
collection for its use,
not just to collect
data” - Anonymous
“Hearing how other states are
approaching cycles and collecting
data/which data they are collecting
is very helpful. No matter what
topic you are focused on, the
process is the same (just like many
of the stakeholders!).” -Anonymous
“it is really valuable to
have in person meeting
time to dedicate to the
project.
Reinvigorating!”-
Anonymous
“Start with a
question and move
on from there.”
-Anonymous
“Very helpful to hear what
other states are doing
regarding evaluation and
fidelity.” -Anonymous
“We need to address
health disparities as
a core objective in
planning our work.”
-Anonymous
“We need to use
data to promote
work (funding
justification,
spread to other
locations, etc.)”
Anonymous
“The rapid cycle nature of
this project is a shift from
the way we often do work.
The more I hear about this
approach, the more I can
apply it to our work.”
-Anonymous
“collecting some data is
better than not collecting
any data in the hope of
collecting perfect data.” -
Anonymous
“All of the materials and the
CoIIN theory of change are a
great framework” -Anonymous
18
Tell Us About Your Progress
Develop
•Preparation for changing how work or activity gets accomplished
Test
•A small-scale trial of a new approach or a new process (change)
Implement
•Making a change a permanent part of your system
Spread
• Intentional and systematic expansion of the number and type of people, units, or organizations implementing the change
Since the May Learning Session have you:
•Developed, tested, implemented, or spread anything?
•Moved from one phase to another?
Overall, in what phase is your CS CoIIN project?
19
Use the Chat
Be as specific as possible
What one thing have you learned from another strategy
team through the CS CoIIN?
20
Sharing Progress Through Examples
Award Categories
Best PDSA
Most Consistent & Highest
Quality Monthly Report
Best Storyboard
Most Likely to have
Significant Impact
Greatest Systems Change
0 to 60
21
Best Plan Do Study Act Cycle
Presented by Jen Leonardo
22
Break Your Work Into Manageable Pieces
Topic Team # PDSA
Submissions (May
2017 – September
2017)
% Strategy Teams
Submitting PDSAs
Child Passenger Safety (7) 5 29%
Falls Prevention (4) 3 75%
Interpersonal Violence
Prevention (8)
4 13%
Suicide and Self-Harm
Prevention (8)
4 25%
Teen Driver Safety (8) 13 75%
Total 29 49%
23
Award Criteria• Considered Cohort 2 work
• Looked for PDSA submissions demonstrating:• Clear relationship between PDSA objectives, tasks and
driver diagrams
• Clearly stated objectives, predictions, and measures
• Consecutive cycles that build on learning
• Scale of the change idea is appropriate
• Learning and next steps
“In public health you don’t see the reward of your work for years –
sometimes 10. it’s nice to have the gratification of the work you are doing
now and see ‘man, parents really need this information’”
Jeanne Bietz, MA, NE DDHS Injury Prevention Program
24
Honorable Mentions
Virginia, Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention:
•For their work identifying training needs and gaps for FAPT team members to recognize and connect at-risk youth to resources
Massachusetts, Falls Prevention
•For partnering with schools to learn the type of information teachers need to manage returning to the classroom after a concussion
Wisconsin, Teen Driver Safety
•For partnering with LHDs and CHWs to build training capacity, ensure fidelity, and pilot TDP parent sessions in new venues, such as the workplace
• Clear PDSA objectives with questions, predictions, and measures
• Working with primary stakeholders
• Building on learning
25
The Award Goes To. . . .
Nebraska Teen Driver Safety
26
Educating and Working with Partners and Policymakers for Improving Graduated Driver Licensing• What are the components of the Traffic Injury
Research Foundation’s GDL framework and how do they compare to Nebraska’s GDL?
• Does Nebraska lose federal funding due to current GDL requirements?
• What is the impact that can be made by upgrading Nebraska’s GDL?
27
Key Reasons Why This Work Is Receiving an Award• Clear PDSA objective with key questions
• Leveraged previous CoIIN work and evidence
• Demonstrated learning
• Identified key partners and next steps to advance the work
Potential to revolutionize how states engage policymakers
to take action
Develop
• Preparation for changing how work or activity gets accomplished
Test
• A small-scale trial of a new approach or a new process (change)
Implement
• Making a change a permanent part of your system
Spread
• Intentional and systematic expansion of the number and type of
people, units, or organizations implementing the change
28
Learning and Next Steps!• Set up a comparison worksheet to understand
TIRF and NE GDL components
• Work with the team to understand how to improve GDL based on this research
• Understand loss of resources that may result from provisions in NE law
Adapt, Adopt, or AbandonAdopt?
Abandon?
Adapt?
29
“Policy Change, Please!” Nebraska
Teen Driver SafetyBest Plan Do Study Act Cycle
30
Top 3 Reasons for Success
•Curiosity, fact finding, passion
• Turns to amazement and what?! Really!
•NE TDS Team input and expert knowledge
•CoIIN guidance of best practice!!!
•Don’t reinvent the wheel
•Ask for help and input
31
Advancing State Injury and Violence Prevention Efforts
• Positive movement toward policy change
• Concrete steps
• Increased awareness to bring about change
• Traffic safety partners being educated and carrying the torch too
• Reaching out and utilizing experts such as CDC
• Insight on research and what is going on across the country
32
Advancing the Field of Injury and Violence Prevention
How has this project contributed to the advancement of the field of injury and violence prevention?
• Increased knowledge of how to reduce motor vehicle crashes for Nebraska teens through policy
• Utilization of an evidence-based, researched strategy for change and putting it into motion
• New messaging and channels for distributing injury prevention messages
• Higher level of work with policy partners and makers
33
Most Consistent and Highest Quality Monthly
ReportPresented by Maria Katradis
34
Most Consistent and Highest Quality Monthly Report
46% have submitted all 4 monthly reports that have come due!
91% of the strategy teams have submitted
at least one monthly report31% have
submitted Progress Reports only
20% have submitted Progress
Reports and Outcome Measures
29% have submitted Progress
Reports and Process Measures
11% have submitted at least one report with all three components!
35
Award Criteria
• Considered Cohort 2 monthly reports
• One of the goals of the CS CoIIN is to report and analyze real-time data to inform and guide your next steps in improving and protecting the lives of children and adolescents in your state.
• Submitting monthly reports is a vital component of this work.
• Through your monthly reports, we are able to demonstrate your progress to date in the CS CoIIN and the progress of the CoIIN overall to HRSA MCHB.
36
Honorable MentionsFlorida
All Teams
•Have consistently submitted progress reports for all 5 teams in C2!
Wisconsin
TDS
•Has submitted process measures and progress reports each month in C2!
Virginia
SSHP
•Has consistently submitted progress reports and outcome measures in C2!
Massachusetts SSHP, Tennessee IPV, Connecticut SSHP, & Vermont CPS
•First three teams to submit all three report components in C2!
37
38
Caretakers Learning to Improve Car Seat Knowledge (CLICK)• In an effort to reduce deaths, hospitalizations, and ED
visits resulting from child passenger safety by 2% respectively, Missouri CPS is working on their CLICK project (Caretakers Learning to Improve Car Seat Knowledge).
• In order for organizations to receive car seats for distribution, Missouri is requiring them to become CPS inspection stations.
• The goal is to create 180 inspection stations across the state through their partnership with Safe Kids coalitions.
• A component of this project is also creating uniform reporting across all inspection sites.
• Resulting from Missouri CPS’s work so far, 6 new counties now have a CPST, 170 car seat events were held, and over 4,000 car seats were checked.
39
Consistent & Quality Monthly Reports• Missouri CPS consistently reported their progress
on all five of their chosen process measures.
• In Cohort 2, they have submitted progress reports and process measures in each of the 4 months.
40
Reporting ConsistentlyMissouri
Child Passenger SafetyMost Consistent and Highest Quality Monthly Report
41
Top 3 Reasons for Success
• Coordination of the work between partners within the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), and Safe Kids coalitions.
• Working with partners to recognize our needs, and to create obtainable goals and objectives.
• Collecting monthly and quarterly data from MoDOT and the Safe Kids coalitions.
42
Advancing State Injury and Violence Prevention Efforts • What is the value added in your project/work?
• Strengthening partnerships with MoDOT.
• Describe the specific ways in which this project has made a positive difference in the state’s work in injury and violence prevention.
• Identified gaps in services, so we can better direct our resources.
• Do you do anything now that you did not do prior to this project?
• Monthly meetings with partners, coordination between partners and sending out announcements of car seat events to bring awareness of the need.
43
Advancing the Field of Injury and Violence PreventionWhat suggestions do you have for other teams on building their own processes for data collection and submission?
• Take advantage of services and data that your partners provide and collect. Talk through the need to find the best sources.
44
Your Favorite Storyboard
Votes from the CS CoIIN Participants and Staff
Presented by Bekah Thomas
Strategic
Initiatives
Portfolio of Improvement
Projects
What you are doing Issues you must
address to achieve
more faster
45
Why Storyboards?
• Lessons learned, theories, and actions in your voice
• Shows progress over the course of the CS CoIIN
• Keeps teams grounded
• Useful in explaining your work to partners, donors/funders, and other interested parties
Number of Storyboards Collected:
22!
46
Award Criteria
Voting by YOU the participants, staff, and advisors to the CS CoIIN
• Clear and focused purpose/problem
• Well-designed action plan
• Supported with data
• Creative
• Logical and clear organization of materials
47
The Awards Go To. . . .
CPS FP IPVP SSHP TDS
FLORIDA!
48
Greatest Systems Change
Presented by Bekah Thomas
Multiple Actors
Diversity
geographic settings and sites
49
Systems Change Is Necessary, but Difficult
50
Award Criteria
• Considered both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 work
• Looked for teams who:
• Identified a problem or glitch in their system
• Developed a solution to that problem
• Worked to implement that solution, despite push back
• Is experiencing gains because of that disruption
The key is to embrace disruption and
change early. Don’t react to it decades
later. You Can’t Fight Innovation
Ryan Kavanaugh
51
Honorable MentionsNebraska, Teen Driver
Safety:
•For their innovative thinking in requiring driving logs to pass drivers education courses
Kentucky, Teen Driver Safety:
•For changing the system so MCH Title V funds can be spent on Teen Driver Safety activities in local health departments
Vermont, Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention:
• For their tests of change to provide universal screening in Emergency Departments
Tennessee, Falls Prevention
• For their SAFE STARS Program, a program honoring sports programs that have high safety standards
Nebraska, Interpersonal Violence
Prevention
• For their invention of the Cry Plan Tool that can help caregivers plan for and cope with stressful infant crying
52
The Award Goes to
53
Electronic check-up forms for child passenger safety inspectionsDevelopment of an App that:
• Reduces Human Error
• Reduces data entry burden
• Provides more real-time information
• Has increased in the number of CPS inspection forms submitted
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Indiana CPS, Submission of Inspection Forms
Number of Universal Safe Seat Inspection Forms Completed and Submitted by CPSTs Median
Introduction of the App
54
Key Reasons Why This Work Is Receiving an Award• Identification of a problem
• Development and testing of a solution
• Recognition that the solution worked
• Additional work to further spread the solution
Develop
•Preparation for changing how work or activity gets accomplished
Test
•A small-scale trial of a new approach or a new process (change)
Implement
•Making a change a permanent part of your system
Spread
• Intentional and systematic expansion of the number and type of people, units, or organizations implementing the change
Potential to revolutionize the way car seat inspection information is
collected and analyzed nationally
55
Electronic check-up forms for child passenger safety
inspections Indiana, CPS
Greatest Systems Change
56
Top 3 Reasons for Success
• 1. Accessibility:
• Tablets given to fitting stations for use.
• Kaci Wray (ICJI) trained each coordinator on using the app prior to going live.
• 2. Ease of use:
• Automatic skip patterns.
• Requirement of completion prior to moving forward.
• Able to submit all inspection forms to database with the push of a button.
• 3. Participation:
• Agencies have been very willing to participate in launch of app.
57
Advancing State Injury and Violence Prevention Efforts • Eventually, the app will:
• Allow more accuracy for data reporting.
• Target specific populations\regions (based on data).
• In the future:• One thing we do now that we did not do prior was analyze
up-to-date data on a regular basis.
• One thing that we don’t do know that we plan to do in the future is to start an evaluation program for the inspection sites.
• We will be able to stop manually entering forms into the database.
• Positive differences:• Standardizing the way we gather, collect, and measure
data.
• Elimination of most human error.
58
Advancing the Field of Injury and Violence Prevention• This project was the first electronic version of the
inspection intake form in the state.
• Increasing data to support our projects and programs.
• When evaluation tool goes into effect, we will be able to provide feedback to technicians:
• Knowledge retention; satisfaction with interaction; etc.
• This has helped in strengthening partnerships across multiple agencies.
59
0 to 60 Accelerating Change
Presented by Jennifer Allison
60
Award Criteria
• Considered work done in both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2
• Looked for teams who:
Have developed, tested, implemented, and spread a change in record time
Had learning and improvement occur in each phase of their work
Showed focus, ingenuity, agility, and persistence in getting their change to spread
61
Honorable Mentions
Massachusetts, Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention:
•For developing, implementing, and spreading a learning collaborative on Zero Suicide
Tennessee, Falls Prevention
•For developing, implementing, and spreading their SAFE STARS Initiative, a program honoring sports programs that have high safety standards
Wisconsin, Teen Driver Safety
•For rapidly and collaboratively designing their approach and kicking off a state GDL campaign
62
The Award Goes to
63
An educational card on the state’s Graduated Driver Licensing law
• After designing the card, the team performed small-scale tests of it through a series of parent focus groups.
• Feedback from these focus groups was incorporated into a second version of the card, which was then disseminated in five Nebraska schools for feedback from teens and parents.
• With a final version of the card, the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles distributed the card at 98 sites.
• Tested for use as a handout.
64
Key Reasons Why This Work Is Receiving an Award
• Innovation and creativity in developing a card that communicated key GDL requirements
• Commitment to thoroughly testing and refining the card to produce the best product
• Ingenuity in doing outreach to state and local law enforcement, pediatricians, drivers education instructors, schools and insurance companies
• Strategic thinking in working through the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles to spread the card
65
GDL EducationNebraska,
Teen Driver Safety0 to 60: Accelerating Change
66
Top 3 Reasons for Success
• Diligence, persistence, coordination by staff
• Survey, survey, survey: now get surveys back!
• Critical role of partners and stakeholders
• Ability to reach certain stakeholders
• Role of PDSA’s in helping the team to refine its approach
• PDSA is like having a coach guiding you without the yelling
• Mistakes are where you learn the most
67
Advancing State Injury and Violence Prevention Efforts• This project has brought about more awareness to
Nebraska’s GDL driving restrictions that was not previously present.
• Learned that education of the GDL driving restrictions to parents and teens is vital.
• Recruitment of law enforcement, DMV, schools, physicians, insurance agents and driver education instructors provides a broader, hands-on reach.
• The impact of the GDL card will lead to work in policy change.
• The PDSA process makes a program step back and assess stakeholders and the importance of their feedback. Previously had not used this method for guidance.
68
Advancing the Field of Injury and Violence Prevention• Developed a new educational product
• Translated research into practice
• Brought together entities working on teen driver safety for one common cause.
• Create cohesiveness
• Created new messaging and utilized new channels for distributing injury prevention messages
69
Most Likely to Have Significant Impact
Presented by Jenny Stern-Carusone
Source: The Improvement Guide, pg. 196
70
Strive to make a difference
71
Award Criteria
• Considered both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 work and accomplishments
• Looked for teams who:
• Included necessary/high leverage change(s) or evidence-based programs
• Are working across the change package
• Are reaching the right audience
• Are working across the state
72
Honorable MentionsVirginia
SSHP
•For creating a statewide strategy that spans all three levels of the Change Package
Massachusetts
SSHP
•For their learning collaborative to implement the Zero Suicide strategy
Minnesota
IPVP
•For targeting youth under the Comprehensive Services Act on recognizing and assessing suicide risk
Florida
ALL TEAMS
•For holistically tackling all 5 CoIIN topics with an integrated statewide strategy
73
WisconsinTeen Driver Safety
The Award Goes To. . . .
74
Integration of the TDS change package in their statewide strategy
• Mapped the drivers, change ideas and process measures to the programs, agencies/partners and policies in their state.
• Societal Level: Initiated a coalition involving stakeholders from the individual to the state level to champion a GDL campaign
• Organizational Level: Engaging law enforcement to improve outreach and interaction with youth and GDL enforcement.
• Relational/Individual Level: Testing workplace lunch hour education opportunities to reach parents of teen drivers.
75
Key Reasons Why This Work Is Receiving an Award
The comprehensive approach spanning the entire change package establishes a strong foundation for success.
76
Teen Driving PlanWisconsin
Teen Driving SafetyMost Likely to Have Significant Impact Award
77
Top 3 Reasons for Success
Across all of our programs the components that contribute most significantly to success are:
• Clear strategy for our system of improvement
• Supportive stakeholders and funders
• Engaged partners
78
Clear vision of how the campaign contributes to our system of improvement
◦ GDL is an evidence-based strategy
◦ Opportunities exist for activities across all the Primary Driver areas
◦ Campaign goals were informed by national and state data/surveys
GDL Example
79
GDL Example
Support for the campaign from key stakeholders and financial resources
• Aligned it with the Wisconsin Injury and Violence Prevention Program goals (DHS)
• Identified how this may increase access to federal funds in the future (DOT)
• Hosted discussions about stakeholder roles, scope of work, key messages
• Routed content through stakeholder SME’s multiple times
• Leveraged multiple funding sources for support
• Co-branded campaign materials
80
GDL Example
Engaged partners who will help share the message
• Distributed materials to stakeholders and funders first
• Sent materials to “second wave” of stakeholders
• Shared resources with internal partners (clinics, leadership, blog)
• Reached out to local TV, radio, print, social media
• Created new website page and Constant Contact
• Distributing materials as part of the NTDSW school activities
• Piloting resources with specific partners (law enforcement, driver education)
• Creating additional video materials for recruitment and advocacy efforts
81
Advancing State Injury and Violence Prevention Efforts • Common messaging and tools across entities
• Evaluation plans are in place to measure campaign reach and effectiveness
• Increased collaboration between state agencies has led to discussion about additional projects
• Exploring new ways to measure partnerships
82
Advancing the Field of Injury and Violence PreventionUsing the CoIIN resources to inform the development of our efforts has allowed us to:
• Create a framework for state level efforts
• Organize our work into manageable segments
• Discuss it more effectively across agencies and disciplines
83
Sharing Progress Through Examples
Award Categories
Best PDSA
Most Consistent & Highest
Quality Monthly Report
Best Storyboard
Most Likely to have
Significant Impact
Greatest Systems Change
0 to 60
84
The Real Winners
ALL OF YOU:
The early adopters
The systems disrupters
The visionary improvers
The injury preventers
THANK YOU FOR
EVERYTHING!
The Power of Small Tests of ChangeA Story
92
Final Thoughts and Next Steps
Jennifer Allison
93
Welcome!
Changes at the CS CoIIN
Mel MillerResearch Associate
Run charts and
participation
tracking
Jim VetterCS CoIIN Co-manager
Topic Lead for SSHP
Topic Call Moderator
for FP, IPVP, and SSHP
See You Soon!
Bekah ThomasNEW Director of Injury
Prevention and Control
Massachusetts Department of
Public Health
94
Upcoming Topic Calls & Deliverables
October 10th: Monthly Reports about September due
November 21st 1-2pm ET: QI Corner
November 28th 1-2pm ET: Populations and Settings
95
Thank you for participating!
Please complete this brief evaluation:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7SGLRRJ
Questions or Comments? Contact:
For more information, visit: https://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/cscoiin