learning design in sociocultural systems€¦ · learning design in sociocultural systems revised...
TRANSCRIPT
Learning Design in Sociocultural Systems revised
Joju Cleaver
ABSTRACT
This paper explores the sociocultural factors that influence learning and assessment in the 21st century classroom. It provides a brief introduction to Universal Instructional Design concepts and Critical Pedagogy and how they may be applied to promote inclusive learning environments.
2
“We serve the future by protecting the present. The more fully the needs of one period are met, the greater will be the success of the next.”
-Maria Montessori
The Montessori philosophy of education offers profound insights into the
development of the child as a natural learner. Montessori proposes, that the first
eighteen years of human development can be divided into three distinct periods, or
planes (Wolf, 2005). These planes are progressive and systemic.
The first plane evolves form birth to six years old. The child wants to know,
“what is this?” and naturally absorbs the world around him. Montessori identified
this as the “absorbent mind” (Wolf, 1995, p.4). The child absorbs the whole language
modeled by his family and explores everything in the environment provided by his
family.
During the second plane, ages six to twelve, is a period of great expansion of
knowledge and the questions become, “How? Why? When? And Where?” Children
are eager to go beyond their familiar environments and want to explore the larger
world around them. “They want to be with other children, play sports, and explore
questions of right and wrong. Through all these experiences, aided by adults, they
gradually acquire a broad variety of basic information, culture, values and social
skills” (Wolf, 2005, p.3).
The Third plane, ages twelve to eighteen evolves from puberty to
adolescence. This is a restless period marked by physical changes and a strong
3
desire for independence. “The character is seldom stable at this age; there are signs
of indiscipline and rebellion” (Montessori,1995, p.21). Montessori suggests, that in
this restless stage in order to express their natural desire to be free from their
parents that teenagers engage in learning experiences that require more physical
effort and incorporates real-life work into the curriculum (Wolf, 2005).
Sociocultural Development
“Over the past 10-20 years, scholars concerned with human development
have shown increasing interest in the social and cultural foundation of the
developmental processes” (Forman, Minick, & Stone, 1993, p.3). The social and
cultural foundation is formed within a sociocultural system. This is not an abstract
concept of cognitive development. It is the concrete and distinct places in which
people live, learn, work, worship and socialize, and each component has a
systematic, systemic affect on human development. It is the contextual reality in
which we exist that informs our psyche and how we learn. Sociocultural systems
vary greatly. How the components of a system interact with one another affects the
functioning of the whole and determines fundamental differences between people.
What are the economics, political & social organization, ideology and language of the
system? Any change to the components changes the system.
Sociocultural Competence
In order to effectively meet the educational needs of multi-cultural student
populations in K-12 classrooms it is necessary to acknowledge, identify and address
the gaps in socio-cultural competence of the teacher and the socio-cultural
4
consciousness of the learner. If teachers are going to be successful in today’s multi-
cultural classroom they will need to develop a method of honest self-analysis and
learner-centered assessment. Who is the teacher? Who are the learners? In order to
adopt a sociocultural awareness a more personalized approach to teaching and
learning is necessary. “Competence is a superordinate standard in multi-cultural
assessment. It is the most crucial and essential standard for the ethical and
responsible selection, adaption/translation, administration, and result
interpretation of assessment” (Leung & Barnett, 2008, 139-143.) Teachers must
have the ability to “read” sociocultural data in order to make accurate and
comprehensive assessments of their diverse student populations.
These changes are not only desirable from an ethical perspective based on
the general principles of competence, integrity, and professional responsibility they
are vital to the relevancy of 21st century education reform. What are the core
problems that create barriers to learning in diverse populations? Are these barriers
attitudinal, organizational or practical? For example, attitudinal barriers may be the
“othering” (Freire, 1970) of diverse populations. “Currently, we create barriers in
[education] that have established a system of ‘othering’ …within institutions of
[education] and in faculty teaching practices, diverse student populations are often
positioned outside, as ‘others’ who must be accommodated or excluded from
institutional culture or classroom norms” (Pliner & Johnson, 2004, p. 108).
Developing a sociocultural competence creates a paradigm shift that adjusts
the focus on diversity from “difference as peripheral to our institutions and
5
classrooms to difference as a core element of an academic mission”(Pliner &
Johnson, 2004, p. 109). Teachers must be able to devise comprehensive strategies to
address the complex needs of diverse learners while keeping their own attitudinal,
cultural, or racial bias in check.
Inclusive Learning Environment
Paolo Friere’s Critical Pedagogy offers a blueprint for educational reform and how to
“read” the classroom as a sociocultural system. His writings illuminate the gap that
exists between teachers, content and marginalized learners. According to Freire
(2005), education is political and should be used as a tool for liberation and
preparation for citizenship.
Educators are often taught to believe that their training in school is all that
they need to perform effectively in the classroom. Few training programs prepare
teachers for the multiple realities of the classroom as a sociocultural system.
Noguero (2007), elaborates, “experience has taught me that to engage in this type of
pedagogical practice (critical pedagogy) effectively, educators must first have an
ability to understand the social-psychological milieu in which such discourse
emerges and is normalized. Without such an understanding their efforts to impose
their mindset and moral reasoning on their students almost always fail” (Noguero,
2007). Educators are often unaware of or keep their distance from the concrete
context (reality) of the learner and attempt to teach solely from a theoretical
context. The inevitable gap that widens between teacher and learner can often
6
result in the pitying, coddling or resentment of marginalized youths seeming
inability to learn.
fig.1. Reading the class as text (Freire,2005).
As a part of preparation and demonstration of competence, Freire proposes
(2005), that teachers learn to read the class as text. (See figure 1.) “ At every step of
the way, in studying and re-studying the data collected, there should be a dialogue
with students, which should result in correction as well as ratification” (Freire,
2005, p.90). This observation and assessment process will effectively build and re-
build understanding and knowledge between the teacher and students. The goal is
to produce improved understanding of class for the teacher and improved
understanding of itself for the class. This “may lead the class to the production of
new knowledge about itself, through a better understanding of its previous
knowledge” (Freire, 2005, p.90).
New Knowledge Improved
Understanding
Reading a Class as text
Studying DataDialogue with
Students
Correction & Ratification
7
fig.2. Sociocultural context.
Informed by a thorough understanding of the sociocultural context of the
students (See fig.2), reading the class as text is key to the development of teachers'
classroom assessment skills and integral to a more authentic learning experience.
Incorporating collaborative and constructivist methods combined with interactive
assessment, interviews, journaling and portfolio work will improve teachers’
observation and questioning skills. Through this process educators will not only
discover truths and achieve a higher level of self-knowledge they will increase their
awareness of the social and cultural influences on the assessment process. This
collaborative feedback and assessment process encourages teachers to
[Multicultural Guidelines] (APA, 2003) “be aware of their own values, attitudes, and
beliefs that may potentially bias their perception of and interactions with
individuals who are racially and ethnically different from themselves” (Leung &
Barnett,, 2008, p.139-143. ) .
Population
Culture
Social Organization
Social Institutions
Material Products
8
The 21st century skills that students need to be successful are not novel skills.
Critical thinking, problem solving, innovation, and collaboration have been around
for decades. However, whether or not students effectively learn these skills will
have a direct impact on their personal success and our collective success as a nation.
Students who are wealthy enough to pay for high quality education or lucky enough
to encounter great teachers will learn these skills. But that leaves out a very large
population of learners who will be left behind.
Technology, UID and Critical Pedagogy
Technology is a powerful tool in promoting equity in education. In the hands
of progressive instructional designers technology can create inclusive learning
spaces that are dynamic, culture-aware and equitable. The principles of UID,
originally developed to assist learners with physical disabilities and learning
differences, are now being applied to instruction, materials, and technology. (Pliner
& Johnson, 2004) Implementing the principles of UID while simultaneously
engaging in theories of Critical Pedagogy as a framework has the potential to create
spaces for students to share power, engage in authentic collaborative learning and
be co-constructors of their assignments (see fig.3). “Teaching benefits greatly from
collaboration among educational agents. By collaboration, we mean student/teacher
involvement in pedagogical decisions […] Because students are the recipients of this
approach, they should be participants in the design of courses, websites, an other
important learning components” (Pliner & Johnson, 2004, p. 111). For example,
platforms can be designed for students to participate in a virtual Town Hall where
9
bias, differences and similarities (in curricula or community) can be addressed in a
supportive environment through active dialectical processes. This dynamic is a step
in the right direction to address some of the fundamental barriers to education
facing multi-cultural populations. Michailidou and Economides (2007), argue that
“computer supported collaborative environments and instructors should take into
consideration cultural factors that influence learners’ learning” (Michailidou &
Economides, 2007, p.247).
A growing number of instructional designers suggest a convergence of
instructional technology and intercultural pedagogy in teacher education. If the
problem is disempowerment, technology should be used to empower. If the problem
is oppression, technology should be used as a tool to promote liberation. If the
problem is underrepresentation and exclusion, technology should be used to as a
tool to promote inclusion. “It is absolutely necessary that educators act in a way
consistent with their choice-which is political-and furthermore that educators be
even more scientifically competent, which teaches them how important it is to know
the concrete world in which their students live” (Freire, 2005, p.129). The
principles of UID and Critical Pedagogy “engages faculty in thinking more broadly
about what they teach, why and how they teach it; and, why and how they assess
student learning” (Pliner & Johnson, 2004, p. 107).
Conclusion
While policy makers and traditional educators resist fundamental reform
and frame discussions about change within efficiency and test scores the gap
10
between teachers , learners and schools widens. It is a daunting task to find
solutions for all of the challenges facing the 21st century classroom. Technology is
not the panacea for the compounded pathologies that affect our institutions,
classrooms, students and teachers. However, it is a tool that can assist us in
unpacking our socio-cultural baggage in order to facilitate understanding.
In order to develop comprehensive learning designs grounded in the
principles UID and Critical Pedagogy we must engage in praxis (Freire, 1970). We
must start with what is happening, actual practice of these principles by real people
in real classrooms and build a body of transformative research. (Pepa, 2005)
Dialectics makes a research study/project transformative. The researcher must
participate and be in the continuous process of reflection on and action in the
context of the problem. If research aims to solve a problem, improve a system or
develop understanding we must bring it back to experience and practice (Pepa,
2005).
No child is an empty vessel. Each child enters the classroom with a
storehouse of knowledge and distinct patterns of meaning-making. Their behaviors
and beliefs are specific to their social, ethnic, class, and age groups. These influences
are powerful and remain with the child throughout their education. Sociocultural
competence is the key to deciphering and decoding the patterns of meaning-making
in diverse populations. These systems are constantly evolving. They are not fixed. In
order to be understood in the context of the 21st century classroom sociocultural
systems must be systematically engaged and systemically evaluated.
11
Fig. 3. UID and Critical Pedagogy
References
American Psychological Association. (2003). Guidelines for multicultural education,
training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. American
Psychologist, 58, 377-402.
Constructivism UID & Critical Pedagogy Knowledge Assumes knowledge is constructed Assumes knowledge is inherited &
constructed
Learning Active process of meaning-making
Interactions with the world Problem solving A social activity,
collaborative Participation in authentic
communities Natural reflection,
assessment and feedback Ownership of the process
Active process of meaning-making
Interactions with the world Problem solving A social activity,
collaborative Participation in authentic
communities Natural reflection,
assessment and feedback Ownership of the process
Conditions for Instruction
Complex & relevant environments,
Social negotiation, Multiple perspectives, Multi-modal, Ownership in learning, Self-awareness of
knowledge construction
Examine the culture of learning & teaching
Inclusive learning environments
Multimodal Materials Balance focus between
content & context
Methods of Instruction
Micro-worlds and hypermedia designs,
Collaborative learning and problem scaffolding
Goal based scenarios & problem based learning
Open software & course management tools
Collaborative learning Student participation in
course design, websites Creating inclusive
pedagogical practices. Adaptable to –and accessible
by-multiple languages an cultures
12
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2001). Universal design for learning. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/udl
Economides, A.A. (2008). Culture-aware collaborative learning. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 2(4), 247
Forman, E.A., Minick, N., Stone, C.A., (1993). Contexts for learning: sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (p.3). New York: Oxford University Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder
Freire, P. (2005). Teachers as cultural workers (pp.90, 129-130,). Cambridge: Westview Press.
Leung, C.Y,Y., Barnett, J.E (2008), Multi-cultural Assessment & Ethical Practice. Independent Practioner, 28, 139-143.
Montessori, M. (1995). The absorbent mind (p.21). New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Noguero, P., (October 2007). Renewing and reinventing Freire: A source of inspiration in inner-city youth education, In Motion Magazine.
Pepa, R.F., “On the edge of Chaos in the Age of Kairos”, Aninang, Vol.II, No.1,ed.,Roderick Pineda (Quezon City: Trinity College of Quezon City).
Perry, T., Steele C., Hilliard A., (2004). Young, gifted, and black: promoting high achievement among african-americans, (p.9),
Pliner , S. M. and Johnson, J.R. (2004). Universal Instructional Design and Critical (Communication) Pedagogy: Strategies for Voice, Inclusion, and Social Justice/Change. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37, (2), 107,109, 111
Ridley, C. R., Hill, C. L., & Wiese, D. L. (2001). Ethics in multicultural assessment. A
model of reasoned application. In L. A Suzuki, J. G. Ponterotto, & P. J. Meller (Eds.),
Handboook of multicultural assessment. Clinical, psychological, and educational
applications (2nd ed., pp. 29-46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Rotherman, A., and Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century skills: the challenges ahead. Teaching for the 21st Century,67(1),pp.16-21.
Wolf, A. (1995). A parents’ guide to the montesorri classroom (p.4). Hollidaysburg, PA: Parent Child Press.
Wolf, A. (2005). Montessori Insights for parents and young children (p.3-4). Hollidaysburg, PA: Parent Child Press.