laws constitutions treaties court reports

80
Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports John Hostage RDA for Law Catalogers Boston, July 21, 2012 #AALL 12

Upload: lynda

Post on 24-Feb-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports. John Hostage RDA for Law Catalogers Boston, July 21, 2012. #AALL12. Compilations. A Compilation. Collaborative works. Exercises. Criminal procedure handbook Codice penale e procedura penale e leggi complementari. Access Points for Works. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

LawsConstitutions

TreatiesCourt Reports

John HostageRDA for Law CatalogersBoston, July 21, 2012

#AALL12

Page 2: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

2

Compilations

Page 3: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

3

A Compilation

Page 4: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

4

Collaborative works

Page 5: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

5

Exercises

• Criminal procedure handbook• Codice penale e procedura penale e leggi

complementari

Page 6: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

6

Access Points for Works

Page 7: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

7

Authorized access points for works

Rules for access points for various kinds of legal works in 6.29

Other kinds of works not listed follow general rules in 6.27

Rules for access points usually built on rules for preferred title for legal works in 6.19

Page 8: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

8

Page 9: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

9

Access points for works

• Determine preferred title for legal work (6.19)• Additions to preferred title (6.20-6.22)• Construct access point to represent legal work (6.29)– Preferred title– Sometimes combined with authorized access point for

creator or other person, etc., associated with work

Page 10: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

10

Recording creators

Page 11: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

11

CreatorsExamples:– Enacting jurisdictions for laws– Heads of state, chief executives, ruling executive

bodies responsible for decrees– Legislative bodies responsible for bills and drafts of

legislation– Promulgating agencies for administrative regulations,

etc.– Enacting jurisdictions and bodies governed for

constitutions, charters, etc.

Page 12: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

12

Creators

– Enacting jurisdictions and promulgating agencies for court rules

– Signatories for treaties, international agreements, etc.– Courts for charges to juries, indictments, court

proceedings, and court decisions• In some cases (e.g. treaties) multiple creators

recorded• N.B. - Creator not always used in authorized

access point!

Page 13: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

13

Other persons, etc.

• Other person, family or corporate body associated with legal works (19.3.2)

• Applied to legal works listed in 19.3.2.1– Jurisdiction governed by a law, regulation, etc.– Issuing agency or agent– Court governed by rules

Page 14: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

14

Other persons, etc.

– Corporate body governed by a constitution, charter, etc.

– Person or corporate body prosecuted in a criminal trial, etc.

– Person or corporate body indicted– Person or corporate body bringing the action in

noncriminal proceedings

Page 15: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

15

Other persons, etc.

– Person or corporate body on the opposing side in noncriminal proceedings

– Judge– Parties to a case– Lawyer representing a party

Page 16: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

16

Core elements

• Different kinds of creators and contributors can be found in same work

• All may be recorded, regardless of role• Core elements– For creators: principal or first-named– For other contributors: if used to construct

authorized access point for work

Page 17: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

17

Commentaries, Annotated editions, etc. (6.27.1.6)

If presented as work of person, etc., responsible for commentary, use access point for that person, etc.

Page 18: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

18

Commentaries, Annotated editions, etc.

If presented as edition of previously existing work, use access point for that work

Page 19: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

19

Specific kinds of legal works

Page 20: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

20

Laws governing one jurisdiction (6.29.1.2)

• Authorized access point for jurisdiction governed (11.13.1), e.g. Canada.

• Preferred title for law or laws (6.19.2), e.g. Canada Corporations Act– Rules for preferred title for laws similar to AACR2

rules for uniform title– Use Laws, etc. for complete or partial compilation

other than subject compilation

Page 21: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

21

Choosing the preferred title for a law

Page 22: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

22

Compilations of laws

Page 23: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

23

Constitutions

• Included in instruction for laws governing one jurisdiction• No RDA rule for shortening the preferred

title as in AACR2, but …

Page 24: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

24

Additions to access points (6.29.1.32)

Add year of promulgation to break conflictFrance. Constitution (1946)France. Constitution (1958)

Page 25: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

25

Laws governing more than one jurisdiction (6.29.1.3)

Authorized access point according to guidelines for compilations by different bodies (6.27.1.4), which says to use the preferred title for the compilation, e.g. Narcotic laws of Mexico and the United States

Page 26: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

26

Administrative regulations, etc., that are laws (6.29.1.4)

Same access point as for laws, e.g.Canada. Queen’s regulation and orders for the Canadian Forces (1994 revision)

New Brunswick. Laws, etc.– For: Regulations of New Brunswick

Page 27: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

27

Bills and drafts of legislation (6.29.1.5)

Combine:• Access point for the legislative body (11.13.1),

e.g. Australia. Parliament. House of Representatives.

• Preferred title for the bill (6.19.2), e.g. Second Corporate Law Simplification Bill

Page 28: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

28

Administrative regulations, etc., that are not laws (6.29.1.7)

Combine:• Access point for the agency or agent (11.13.1),

e.g. Illinois. Department of Public Health.Note: “Department” not abbreviated

• Preferred title for the regulations (6.19.2), e.g. Rules and regulations for recreational areas

Page 29: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

29

Rules governing a single court (6.29.1.10)

Combine:• Access point for the court (11.13.1), e.g.

United States. Tax Court.

• Preferred title for the rules (6.19.2), e.g.Rules of practice and procedure of the United States Tax Court

Page 30: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

30

Constitutions, charters, etc., of international intergovernmental bodies (6.29.1.13)

Combine:• Access point for the body (11.13.1), e.g.

United Nations.• Preferred title for constitution, etc.

(6.19.2), e.g.Charter of the United NationsNote: not clear if LC-PCC PS 6.19.2 applies to shorten title

Page 31: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

31

Exercises

• Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

• Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth

Page 32: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

Treaties and other international agreements

Page 33: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

33

Page 34: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

34

Treaties, etc., between national governments (6.29.1.15)

Combine:• Access point for government named first

(11.13.1)– Exception: if one govt. on one side and 2 or

more on other side, use the one on one side• Preferred title for treaty (6.19.2.7), e.g.

Treaties, etc.

Page 35: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

35

Choosing preferred title for treaty

Page 36: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

36

Treaty example (cover page)

Page 37: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

37

Constructing the Access Point

• Access point for first-named governmentUnited States.

• Preferred title of treatyTreaties, etc.

Page 38: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

38

Additions to treaties (6.29.1.33)

• name of second party, e.g. Bulgaria

• date, earlier date, or earliest date of signing, e.g.1991 June 7Note: Names of months no longer abbreviated (6.20.3)

• Full access point:United States. Treaties, etc. Bulgaria, 1991 June 7

Page 39: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

39

First signatory?

• If no consistency in order in which governments are named, use govt. named first in first resource received

• If signatories can’t be determined use preferred title of treaty, e.g.Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization

Page 40: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

40

Treaty example: no signatories listed

Page 41: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

41

Treaty example enlarged

Page 42: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

42

Additions to treaties entered under name of treaty

• Add date, earlier date, or earliest date of signing (6.29.1.33)

Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (1994 April 15)

• Change from earlier practice (year only)

Page 43: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

43

Agreements contracted by international intergovernmental bodies (6.29.1.16)

Follow same rule as for international treaties, i.e. combine first named party and preferred title “Treaties, etc.”

Page 44: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

44

Example

For: Agreement between the United Nations and the World Intellectual Property Organization

• First named party: United Nations.• Preferred title: Treaties, etc.• Full access point:

United Nations. Treaties, etc. World Intellectual Property Organization, 1975 January 21

Page 45: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

45

Agreements contracted by the Holy See (6.29.1.17)

Follow same rule as for international treaties, i.e. combine first named party and preferred title “Treaties, etc.”

Page 46: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

46

Example

For: Accordo del 18 febbraio tra l'Italia e la Santa Sede

• First named party: Italy.• Preferred title: Treaties, etc.• Full access point:

Italy. Treaties, etc. Catholic Church, 1984 February 18

Page 47: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

47

Other agreements involving jurisdictions (6.29.1.18)

2 or more jurisdictions below national level or a national government and one or more jurisdictions within its country: – follow rules for collaborative works (6.27.1.3), i.e.

first named party and no “Treaties, etc.”

Page 48: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

48

Examples

2 jurisdictions below national levelMaine. Joint agreement between the state of Maine and the

province of New Brunswick

National government and one of its jurisdictionsOntario. Memorandum of agreement between the

government of the province of Ontario and the government of Canada pursuant to section 4(3) of the Anti-Inflation Act

Page 49: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

49

Other agreements

Jurisdictions below national level and one or more international intergovernmental bodies: – follow 6.29.1.16, i.e. combine first named party

and “Treaties, etc.”

Page 50: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

50

Other agreements

National government and one or more jurisdictions below national level outside its country: – follow 6.29.1.15, i.e. combine first named party

and “Treaties, etc.”

Page 51: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

51

Example

For: Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the British Virgin Islands for the Avoidance of Double Taxation …

First named party: United States.Preferred title: Treaties, etc.Full access point:

United States. Treaties, etc. British Virgin Islands, 1981 February 18

Page 52: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

52

Other agreements

2 or more national governments and one or more jurisdictions below national level:

follow 6.29.1.15, i.e. combine first named party and preferred title “Treaties, etc.”

Page 53: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

53

Other agreements

Government at any level and a non-governmental corporate body:

• follow 6.27.1.3 for collaborative works, i.e. first named party and no “Treaties, etc.”, e.g.:Liberia. Concession agreement between the government of the Republic of Liberia and Liberia Iron and Steel Corporation

Page 54: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

54

Protocols, amendments, etc.

• Use authorized access point for basic agreement including additions such as other party and date (6.29.1.19)

• Add “Protocols, etc.” and date of signing of protocol (6.29.1.33)Ireland. Treaties, etc. Portugal, 1993 June 1. Protocols, etc., 2005 November 11

Page 55: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

55

Compilations of treaties:preferred title

6.29.1.33

Should be 1713 April 11 ?

Page 56: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

56

Compilations of treaties, etc.:access points (6.29.1.20)

• Between two parties: use same access point as for single agreement

• Between one party and two or more parties on other side: use same access point as for single agreement

• Other compilations: use general instructions (6.27.1.4)

Page 57: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

57

Exercises

• NAFTA• Russia-European Union treaty• Protocol to Rio Treaty

Page 58: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

Other legal works

related to courts and court cases

Page 59: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

59

Reports of one court (6.29.1.21)

•Not ascribed to reporter: use access point for court and preferred title for reports, e.g.

Canada. Federal Court. Canada Federal Court reports

Arizona. Court of Appeals. Reports of cases argued and determined in the Court of Appeals of Arizona

•Rule recently revised

Page 60: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

60

Reports of one court

Ascribed to reporter(s): use access point for reporter

Manning, James, 1781-1866. Common bench reports For: Common bench reports : cases argued and determined in the Court of Common Pleas / [reported] by James Manning, T.C. Granger, and John Scott

Page 61: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

61

Reports by one reporter (ex.)

Page 62: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

62

Reports of more than one court (6.29.1.22)

One reporter or collaborating reporters: use access point for single reporter or one with principal responsibility plus preferred title for reportsFreeman, Richard, 1645 or 1646–1710. Reports of cases argued and determined in the Courts of King’s Bench and Common Pleas, from 1670 to 1704

Page 63: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

63

Reports of more than one court

Reporter(s) not responsible for all reports, or no reporter: use preferred title, e.g.Australian law reports

Page 64: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

64

Exercises

• U.S. reports• Supreme Court reporter

Page 65: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

65

Citations, digests, etc. (6.29.1.23)• If compiler, etc., prominently named: combine

access point for person and preferred title, e.g. Phillips, Richard H. (Richard Henry), 1890–1971. Connecticut digest, 1785 to date

• Otherwise, use preferred title, e.g.Commonwealth digest

Page 66: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

66

Criminal proceedings (ex.)

Page 67: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

67

Criminal proceedings and appeals (6.29.1.24)

Combine:• Access point for defendant or first-named

defendantAlley, Leavitt.

• Preferred title for proceedingsReport of the trial of Leavitt Alley, indicted for the murder of Abijah Ellis, in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Page 68: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

68

Noncriminal proceedings (ex.)

Page 69: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

69

Civil and other noncriminal proceedings and appeals (6.29.1.25)

Combine:• Access point for plaintiff or first-named

plaintiffBrooks, William, 1803–1863.

• Preferred title for proceedingsCase of William Brooks versus Ezekiel Byam and others, in equity, in the Circuit Court of the United States, for the First Circuit-District of Massachusetts

Page 70: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

Indictment (ex.)

70

Page 71: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

71

Indictments (6.29.1.26)

Follow rules for criminal proceedings, i.e. combine person indicted plus preferred title for indictment

Duane, William, 1760–1835. Copy of an indictment (No. 1) in the Circuit Court of the United States in and for the Pennsylvania District of the Middle Circuit

Page 72: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

Charge to jury (ex.)

72

Page 73: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

73

Charges to juries (6.29.1.27)

Combine:• Access point for the court

United States. Circuit Court (Middle Circuit). • Preferred title for the charge

Charge of Judge Paterson to the jury in the case of Vanhorne’s lessee against Dorrance

Page 74: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

74

Judicial decision (ex.)

Page 75: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

75

Judicial decisions (6.29.1.28)

Combine:• Access point for the court

United States. Supreme Court.• Preferred title for the decision

Freedom of the press

Page 76: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

76

Judicial opinions (6.29.1.29)

Combine:• Access point for the judge

Sutliff, Milton, 1806–1879. • Preferred title for the opinion

Dissenting opinion of Hon. Milton Sutliff, one of the judges

Page 77: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

77

Records of one party (6.29.1.30)

For brief, plea, etc., combine:• Access point for the party

Morewood, George B.• Preferred title for the brief, etc.

George B. Morewood, John R. Morewood, Frederic R. Routh, respondents, appellants versus Lorenzo N. Enequist, libellant, appellee

Page 78: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

78

Records of one party:Lawyer’s argument (example)

Page 79: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

79

Records of one party

For courtroom argument presented by lawyer, combine:

• Access point for lawyer Gowen, Franklin B. (Franklin Benjamin), 1836–1889.

• Preferred title for the argumentArgument of Franklin B. Gowen, Esq., of counsel for the Commonwealth, in the case of the Commonwealth vs. Thomas Munley

Page 80: Laws Constitutions Treaties Court Reports

80

Thank you

• John [email protected]

#AALL12