latest developments in euv optics · rad pattern shift through focus. ... 3d mask compensation all...
TRANSCRIPT
Latest developments in EUV optics
2017-06-15
Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo
Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss),
Bernhard Kneer (Zeiss).
Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de
Kerkhof (ASML)
22017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Starlith® 3300/3350/3400 optical train
32017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Evolutionary improvements in EUV optics Enabling 7 nm and 5 nm nodes for imaging, focus and overlay
Population shows wavefront improvements towards NXE:3400
42017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Starlith® 3300 illuminatorActuated fly’s eye unit enables lossless setting changes
Intermediate
Focus
Field Facet Mirror
Pupil Facet Mirror
Standard pupil shapes
52017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
≈ 20% pupil fill ratio
Starlith® 3400
≈ 40% pupil fill ratio
Starlith® 3350
∆
NIL
S(n
orm
aliz
ed
ima
ge
log s
lop
e)
half-pitch / nm
13 nm resolution at full throughput
Starlith® 3350
• 2 pupil facets per field facet
Starlith® 3400
• many pupil facets per field facet
Decrease pupil filling Extend sigma range
Starlith® 3400 decreases resolution limit
62017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
New application specific pupil types
Quasar
H&V Lines&Spaces
18 nm half-pitch
Contact Hole array
18 nm half-pitch
for DRAM active area
13 nm hp SERotated Dipoles 22°
Hexapoles
16.5 nm half-pitch Single Exposure
for DRAM storage node (hexagonal contact hole array)
Logic (irregular contacts)Small conventional
72017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
3D mask induced pattern shift through focusOrigins
Effective Width
Effective Width
Illumination Diffraction
82017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
3D mask induced pattern shift through focusConsequences
LTE Substrate
MO/Si Multilayer (ML)Abs
orbe
r
Abso
rber
Abso
rber
Abs
orbe
r
Dipole Y
Due to oblique incidence on mask,
3D mask effect can induce imaging telecentricity
(placement error divided by defocus)
pitch / nmte
lece
ntr
icity
/ m
rad
Pattern shift through focus
92017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Pupil tuning can compensate for3D mask induced pattern shift through focus
Before tuning After pupil tuning
Pattern shift through focus
Adjust the pupil (induce a pupil imbalance) to
compensate for the 3D mask induced
telecentricity through pitch (while maintaining
the proximity behavior)
pitch / nmte
lece
ntr
icity
/ m
rad
102017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Freeform pupil shapes
target shape
EUV pupil
SMO pupil
for logic cut mask
rotated pupil shape
for DRAM brickwalls
y-asymmetric
3D mask compensation
all examples without light loss (100% illuminator efficiency) on
Starlith® 3400 illumination system
112017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Pupil tuning can adjust proximity bias
pitch / nm
C
D /
nm
original pupil
After mask tape-out, tweek the process to adjust
the proximity curve, i.e. iso-dense bias?
adjust the pupil by switching a few pupil spots
pitch / nm
C
D /
nm
after pupil tuning
pitch / nm
C
D /
nm
after pupil tuning
pitch / nm
C
D /
nm
after pupil tuningafter pupil tuning
pitch / nm
C
D /
nm
122017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
NXE:3400 ready for 5nm logicFull-wafer CDU 0.2nm
Full wafer plot (H) Intrafield plot (H)
13m
dense lin
es
16m
isolin
es
Test item Unit Actual
Full wafer at nominal focus nm 0.2
Intrafield at best focus nm 0.2
Intrafield at ±30 nm off focus nm 0.2
Test item Unit Actual
Full wafer at nominal focus nm 0.2
Intrafield at best focus nm 0.2
Intrafield at ±30 nm off focus nm 0.3
Test item Unit Actual
Full wafer at nominal focus nm 0.3
Intrafield at best focus nm 0.2
Intrafield at ±30 nm off focus nm 0.3
Imaging 16nm isolated spaces CDU - H
Imaging 16nm isolated spaces CDU - V
Imaging 16nm isolated spaces CDU - H
132017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
NXE:3400 illuminator gives proven LCDU gains
• Reduced PFR translates in
improved contrast and LCDU,
(without loss of light down to
20% PFR)
142017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Looking to the future…
High-NA anamorphic systems
152017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
High NA EUV
EUVL 2016, “EUV roadmap extension by higher Numerical Aperture”, Jan van Schoot
162017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Reticle
Why anamorphic?Separate light cones while preserving the angles on the mask
NA 0.33
4x4 Isomorphic
CRA ~ 6°
NA 0.55
4x4 Isomorphic
CRA ~ 6°
NA 0.55
4x4 Isomorphic
CRA > 6°
NA 0.55
4x8 Anamorphic
CRA ~ 6°
0.33/4 0.55/4 0.55/4 0.55/8
Reticle Reticle Reticle Reticle
172017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Why is there an obscuration?Limiting angle on the mirror
Standard EUV coatings are not able to reflect
the combination of large angles and large
angular spread needed for high-NA.
Medium NA High-NA
High-NA
With obscuration
182017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Anamorphic imagingPrints a half-field using a current 6 inch mask
104 mm
132 m
m
33 m
m
26 mm 26 mm
26 mm16.5
mm
16.5
mm
104 mm 104 mm
132 m
m
192017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Imaging evaluation of key lithographic structures:Comparable performance as 0.33 NA at ~40% lower resolution
25
20
15
10
5
0
Dense Hor
L/S
Dense CHs Dense Hor
spaces
Semi-dense
Hor spaces
Semi-iso
Hor spaces
Exposure
Latitu
de {
%}
NXE:3400
NXE:3500
13 n
m
8 n
m
18 n
m
11 n
m
20nm
CD
40nm
pitch
12nm
CD
24nm
pitch
20nm
CD
60nm
pitch
12nm
CD
36nm
pitch
20nm
CD
80nm
pitch
12nm
CD
48pitch
300
250
150
100
50
0
Dense Hor
L/S
Dense CHs Dense Hor
spaces
Semi-dense
Hor spaces
Semi-iso
Hor spaces
Depth
of
focus {
nm
}
NXE:3400
NXE:3500
13 n
m
8 n
m
18 n
m
11 n
m
20nm
CD
40nm
pitch
12nm
CD
24nm
pitch
20nm
CD
60nm
pitch
12nm
CD
36nm
pitch
20nm
CD
80nm
pitch
12nm
CD
48nm
pitch
200
Comparable Exposure Latitude
at 40% lower resolution
DOF at equivalent k1 factor
Follows NA scaling 𝟎.𝟑𝟑
𝟎.𝟓𝟓
𝟐
202017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Infrastructure currently under construction by Zeiss
212017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Lead time critical components on order
Chamber flanges Chamber doors
Grinding machine
222017-06-15Carl Zeiss SMT, Jack Liddle (Zeiss), Joerg Zimmermann (Zeiss), Jens Timo Neumann (Zeiss),Matthias Roesch (Zeiss), Ralf Gehrke (Zeiss), Bernhard
Kneer (Zeiss). Eelco van Setten (ASML), Jan van Schoot (ASML), Mark van de Kerkhof (ASML)
Conclusions
Starlith 3400
• Better POB
• Flexibility in illuminator
• Improved imaging
• Ready for 7nm and 5nm nodes
High-NA Anamorphic
• Novel design concept
• Anamorphic design. Limits incident angles on mask, enables high contrast
• Obscuration. Limits incident angles on mirrors, enables higher tranmission.
• Infrastructure currently under construction