language and thought slides prepared by randall e. osborne, texas state university-san marcos...

58
Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University- San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert Wegner

Upload: kimberly-day

Post on 05-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

Language and Thought

Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos

Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon

PSYCHOLOGYSchacter

Gilbert

Wegner

Page 2: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

2

7.1 Language and Communication

-What is language??

Page 3: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

3

7.1 Language and Communication

- Language is a system for communicating with others using signals that convey meaning and are combined according to rules of grammar.

Page 4: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

4

7.1 Language and Communication

- What are the Basic Characteristics of Language?

Page 5: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

5

7.1 Language and Communication

•Phoneme - The smallest unit of sound that is recognizable as speech rather than as random noise.

•Morpheme - A morpheme is a combination of phonemes.

•A morpheme carries meaning whereas the phonemes do not carry meaning.

Page 6: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

6

7.1 Language and Communication

- The English language has about 40 different phonemes, whereas other languages have between 12 and 85.

Page 7: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

7

7.1 Language and Communication

- Every language has phonological rules that indicate how phonemes can be combined to produce speech sounds.

.

Page 8: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

8

7.1 Language and Communication

- People learn these phonological rules without instruction, and if the rules are violated, the resulting speech sounds so odd that we describe it as speaking with an accent.

- .

.

Page 9: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

9

7.1 Language and Communication

Infants are born with the ability to distinguish phonemes, and language rules for combining them occurs automatically.

.

Page 10: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

10

7.1 Language and Communication

- All languages have a grammar, or a set of rules that specific how we combine units of language to produce meaningful messages.

.

Page 11: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

11

7.1 Language and Communication

- Grammar rules fall into two categories:

- Morphological Rules and Syntax Rules

.

Page 12: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

12

7.1 Language and Communication

•Morphological Rules indicate how morphemes can be combined to form words. Some are content morphemes (cat, dog) and some functional morphemes (and, or) that tie words together.

Page 13: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

13

7.1 Language and Communication

- Syntaxical Rules indicate how words can be combined to form phrases and sentences. Example a sentence has to have a noun and verb

Page 14: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

14

7.1 Language and Communication

- If the syntaxical rules are not followed we don’t’ have a sentence.

Page 15: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

15

7.1 Units of Language

Page 16: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

16

7.1 Syntactical Rules

Page 17: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

17

7.1 Language and Communication

- Deep structure vs. surface structure•deep = meaning•surface = wording

Page 18: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

18

7.1 Language and Communication

•Deep structure refers to the meaning of the sentence.

Page 19: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

19

7.1 Language and Communication

•Surface Structure refers to how a sentence is worded.•.

Page 20: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

20

7.1 Language Development

- At birth—infants can distinguish all contrasting sounds in human language

- 6 months—can only distinguish those sounds in language being spoken around them

- 4-6 months—begin to babble speech sounds

Page 21: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

21

7.1 Language Milestones

Page 22: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

22

7.1 Language Development

- Theories of Language Development:

- Behaviorist Explanations

- Nativist Explanations

- Interactionist Explanations

Page 23: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

23

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Behaviorist explanations• principles of operant conditioning• learn to talk through reinforcement, shaping, and

extinction• limits:

(1) parents don’t spend much time teaching grammar,

(2) children generate more grammatical sentences than they hear,

(3) errors children make do not duplicate what they hear

Page 24: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

24

7.1 Language Development

- In this theory, children acquire language through simple principles of operant conditioning. As infants start to vocalize they lose vocalizations that are not reinforced and continue with those that are reinforced. Example prah (no response from parent) but dada (great response from parents)

Page 25: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

25

7.1 Language Development

- The behaviorist explanation is attractive because it offers a simple account of language development, but the theory cannot account for many fundamental characteristics of language development

Page 26: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

26

7.1 Language Development

- Parents don’t spend that much time teaching children to speak grammatically

- Children generate many more grammatical sentences than they ever hear so they do more than imitate

Page 27: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

27

7.1 Language Development

- Nativist Explanation:

- This theory holds that language development is best explained as an innate, biological capacity. As the brain matures language naturally progresses.

- This theory is criticized becauSe it does not explain how language developes, only why.

Page 28: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

28

7.1 Language Development

- So interactionists say that while infants are born with an innate ability to acquire language, social interactions play a crucial role in language development.

Page 29: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

29

7.1 Language Development

- Interactionist Explanation:

- Interactionists point out that parents tailor their verbal interactions with children in ways that simplify the language acquisition process by speaking slowly, using simpler sentences, and enunciating clearly.

Page 30: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

30

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Interactionist explanations•how does innate, biological capacity for language

combine with environmental experience?•parents tailor verbal interactions with children in

ways that simplify language acquisition•deaf children NOT taught sign language often

develop own system of hand signals

Page 31: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

31

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Neurological specialization

• Broca’s area (involved in language production)

• Wernicke’s area (involved in language comprehension)

• Aphasia

Page 32: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

32

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- In most people the Broca's area is in the lower part of the left  frontal lobe.  It is one of the main language areas in the cerebral cortex because it controls the motor aspects of speech. 

Page 33: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

33

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Persons with a Broca aphasia can usually understand what words mean, but have trouble performing the motor or output aspects of speech.  Thus, other names for this disorder are 'expressive' and 'motor' aphasia.

Page 34: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

34

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Depending on the severity of the lesion to Broca's area, the symptoms can range from the mildest type (cortical dysarthria) with intact comprehension and the ability to communicate through writing to a complete loss of speaking out loud.

Page 35: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

35

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Wernicke’s area is specialized for language comprehension.

Page 36: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

36

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Wernicke's aphasia is a language disorder that impacts language comprehension and the production of meaningful language.

Page 37: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

37

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- The disorder is related to damage to the Wernicke&'s Area. Individuals with Wernicke'&'s aphasia have difficulty understanding spoken language but are able to produce sounds, phrases, and word sequences.

Page 38: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

38

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- While these utterances have the same rhythm as normal speech, they are not language because no information is conveyed.

Page 39: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

39

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Can other species learn human language?

- Washoe taught sign language• learned 160 words•could construct simple sentences•novel constructions•can learn signs for concepts they understand

(not abstract)

Page 40: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

40

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- Apes can learn new vocabulary and construct simple sentences but compared with humans are limited in terms of vocabulary and grammatical complexity.

Page 41: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

41

7.1 Theories of Language Development

- So do you think that bilingualism interferes with cognitive development?

Page 42: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

PSYCHOLOGYSchacter

Gilbert

Wegner

7.2

Concepts and Categories: How We Think

Page 43: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

43

7.2 Memory Storage

- We store our knowledge in three main ways:

- Our experiences in terms of individual memories

- Generalizations that take the form of prototypes

- Factual information that is codified in terms of rules

Page 44: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

44

7.2 Categories

Category-specific deficits•damage to front part of left temporal lobe—

difficulty identifying humans•damage to lower left temporal lobe—trouble

identifying animals•damage where temporal and occipital lobes meet

—trouble naming tools

Page 45: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

45

7.2 Concepts

- The brain organizes concepts into distinct categories, such as living thing and human-made things.

Page 46: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

46

7.2 Concepts

- We use family resemblance, prototypes and exemplars to categorized and keep track of our knowledge about the world.

- What does family resemblance mean?

Page 47: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

47

7.2 Concepts and Categories

- Family resemblance are features that appear to be characteristic of category members but may not be possessed by every member.

- For example, you and your sister may have your mother’s eyes.

Page 48: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

48

7.2 Concepts and Categories

- For example, many members of the bird family have feathers so these are characteristic features

Page 49: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

49

7.2 Concepts and Categories

- What’s a prototype or the prototype theory?

Page 50: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

50

7.2 Concepts and Categories

- The prototype theory states that psychological categories that we form naturally are best described as organized around a prototype which is the best or most typical member fo the category.

Page 51: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

51

7.2 Concepts and Categories

- According to this theory if your prototypical bird is a robin, then a canary would be considered a better example of a birth than would be an ostrich because they have more features in common.

Page 52: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

52

7.2 Concepts and Categories

- Apples, oranges, and bananas are members of the category fruit.

Page 53: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

53

7.2 Concepts and Categories

- How about the Exemplar Theory

- This theory holds that we make category judgments by comparing a new instance with stored memories for other instances of the category.

Page 54: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

54

7.2 Concepts and Categories

- We use concepts and categories to solve problems, make inferences, and guide judgments.

Page 55: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

PSYCHOLOGYSchacter

Gilbert

Wegner

7.4

Problem Solving: Working It Out

Page 56: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

56

7.4 Problem Solving

- Problem solving is a process in which new information is interpreted in terms of old knowledge.

- The solutions we generate often depend on the organization of our knowledge as well as the objective characteristics of the problems.

Page 57: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

57

7.4 Problem Solving

- Approaches to problem solving: Problem solving can be accomplished in a variety of ways.

- Means-end analysis is a process of moving a current state more in line with a desired end state.

Page 58: Language and Thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos Revised by Dr. Donna Bar-Navon PSYCHOLOGY Schacter Gilbert

58

7.4 Problem Solving

- Analogical problem solving is an attempt to solve a problem by finding a similar problem with a known solution and applying that solution to the current problem.

- Creative and insightful solutions often involve restructuring a problem so that it turns into a problem for which a solution procedure is already known.