language and nationality najd 232. language and nationality is speaking the same language...

35
Language and Nationality Najd 232

Upload: gyles-daniels

Post on 19-Jan-2016

236 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Language and NationalityNajd 232

Page 2: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Language and Nationality Is speaking the same language

sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should all people in the same nation speak the same language?

Page 3: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Language and Nationality

If the answer to both these questions is no, what should be the status of “minority” languages in multilingual societies?

Page 4: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Language and Nationality In this section, we will focus on

language and the nation-state. We will look at how the symbolic value of languages is used by the people to pursue political power and ends, and foster consciousness among members of the group. We will look at two case studies: India and Canada.

Page 5: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India India is one of the most multilingual

countries in the world. More than 400 languages are spoken there. These languages span at least four language families:

Indo-European Dravidian Austroasiatic Tibeto-Burman As well as some isolates

Page 6: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India There are twenty-two official “scheduled”

languages recognized in the constitution. Although English is not a legally sanctioned language, the Presidential Order of 1960 states “it should be the principal official language and Hindi the subsidiary Official language till 1965. After 1965, when Hindi becomes the principal official language of the Union, English should continue as the subsidiary official language.”

Page 7: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

IndiaHow does India, a federal republic, deal administratively with such a vast collection of languages?

Page 8: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India Regional level

Eastern India dominated by 3 languages:

BengaliOriya

Assamese

Page 9: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India Regional level

Western India dominated by 2 languages:

MarathiGujarati

Page 10: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India Regional level

Northern India dominated by 4 languages:

HindiUrdu

PunjabiKashmiri

Page 11: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India Regional level

Southern India dominated by 4 languages:

TeluguTamil

KannadaMalayalam

Page 12: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India There are many non-Hindi speaking

citizens who are reluctant to accept Hindi which is the official language in six of the twenty-five states of the republic of India.

Therefore, English – the language of those who governed most of India as a British colony for nearly a century – serves as the associate national language and as a lingua franca acceptable to both the north and south India.

Page 13: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India In a country where many languages are

spoken but do not all enjoy the same degree of prestige, bilingualism, multilingualism and *diglossia are of common occurrence.

* diglossia: a situation in which two distinct varieties of a language are spoken within the same speech community. 

Page 14: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

IndiaFor interethnic oral

communication of an informal nature, Hindi or Urdu is used to a varying degree throughout the country ( the two are very similar in their colloquial forms, but Hindi is written in the Devanagari script whereas Urdu in a modified form of Arabic script).

Page 15: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

IndiaHindi Script Urdu Script

Page 16: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India Such a large linguistic variety (in

both languages and dialects) as exists in India poses a number of questions. Although it might be expected that one official language would tend to promote unity in a multiethnic nation, such unity would be achieved at a considerable loss of prestige to other native languages spoken by millions of people.

Page 17: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

IndiaThis is why the most widely used language in India, Hindi, has encountered resistance in many parts of the country.

Page 18: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Hindi or English? Contentious Language Issue Resurfaces in India

The contentious language issue, of whether to use Hindi or English, has resurfaced in India, where the new government is proposing giving Hindi primacy in official communications. India’s southern states, which do not speak the language of the north, have rejected such moves, but the bureaucracy in the Indian capital is scrambling to brush up its Hindi skills.

Political leaders in southern states voiced loud protests when his government recently ordered officials to prioritize Hindi over English on official accounts on social media platforms such as Twitter and on government websites.www.voanews.comJuly 03, 2014

Page 19: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India This is the reason why a

nonindigenous and formerly a colonial language, English, has maintained itself surprisingly well as an associate official language since India’s independence. A second language for many Indians, English does not give an advantage to speakers of one particular native language, as does Hindi.

Page 20: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India Another question has to do with

determining the languages to be taught and used for instruction in Indian schools. What eventually became known as the three-language formula has resulted in secondary students being taught the regional language, Hindi and English ( and in many instances their mother tongue is yet a fourth language or local dialect).

Page 21: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

India Throughout much of the world, dialectal

differences have tended to diminish rapidly in recent decades as a result of the mass media, education, and mobility. This has not happened in India, where caste differences are effectively symbolized by speech differences. As long as the old and well established social hierarchy persists, linguistic differences serve a useful function and are likely to be retained.

Page 22: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

CanadaAs in India, there is a great

linguistic diversity in Canada – some eighty-five languages being spoken – but the biggest issue is the tension between the two official languages, French and English.

Page 23: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

CanadaProblems of bilingualism have always been the central issue in the nation’s politics.

Page 24: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada Jacques Cartier landed in current

Quebec in 1534 and claimed the territory for King Francis I, eventually calling it New France. A century and a half later, British entrepreneurs, incorporated by Royal Charter, started fur trading in the Hudson Bay area in northern Canada.

Page 25: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada After that, animosity

between France and Britain gradually increased, and as a result of the Seven Year’s War (1756-1763), the British government took over lower Canada and New France (which was renamed Quebec).

Page 26: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada The differences between these two

colonial populations were significant. French colonists spoke French, practiced Catholicism and followed the French civil code.

The British colonists spoke English, practiced Protestantism and followed traditional English common law.

Page 27: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada To avert further local conflict, the

British passed the Quebec Act of 1777. This guaranteed the residents the use of the French language, Catholicism and French civil law. This practice was reified (made more real) several times, and in 1969 the Official Languages Act made English and French Canada’s two official languages.

Page 28: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada According to 2007 government

figures, about 60 percent of Canadians claim English as their native language, as do about 23 percent for French. The majority of these French speakers – about 86 percent – live in Quebec. More than 17 percent of the population is bilingual in English and French.

Page 29: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

CanadaIn spite of the unique

characteristics and background of the original British and French settlers, Anglophone Canadians began to control most of the elite positions in business and industry, even in Quebec.

Page 30: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada By the 1960s, many Francophone

residents began to feel that the French language was being overwhelmed by English. To maintain Canada’s bilingualism, the federal and local governments created various departments and institutions to oversee the use of languages in the province.

Page 31: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada For some Canadians, one of these –

the Quebec Board of the French Language – has sometime been draconian in its enforcement of language policies. For example, the Board’s “language police” (as labeled by some nationalist newspapers) gave tickets to shop owners who neglected to provide signs in French.

Page 32: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

CanadaHowever, by the end of the

twentieth century, such extreme policies were rescinded (removed) , and the laws were modified to make French just markedly predominant on exterior business signs, as suggested by the Supreme court of Canada.

Page 33: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada For the most part, the promotion of

personal bilingualism in English and French is an important objective of the Canadian government. For example, in 2003, the federal government announced a ten-year goal to double bilingualism among Canadian college graduates from 24 percent to 50 percent by 2013.

Page 34: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

CanadaHowever, the influence of

English still remains strong. According to Monica Heller (1988), because of the social and economic tensions between Francophone and Anglophone speakers in Quebec, how bilingual speakers see these two languages is highly charged.

Page 35: Language and Nationality Najd 232. Language and Nationality  Is speaking the same language sufficient grounds for people to establish a nation? Should

Canada These language issues have important political implications. Some believe that the only way to protect the French language and Francophone rights is for Quebec to split off from the rest of Canada. This has been an issue in almost every election since the 1980s. Although it is unlikely that Canada will divide, the cultural and linguistic tensions remain.