landscape review eu accountability and public audit arrangements mr. kevin cardiff reporting member...
TRANSCRIPT
Landscape review EU accountability and public audit arrangements
Mr. Kevin CardiffReporting Member (ECA)
Mr. Jacques SciberrasProject team leader
ECA Conference, Brussels14th October 2014
A complex EU accountability landscape
AUDIT SCRUTINY
Page 2
• ECA
• SAIs, national, regional
auditors
• Audit Boards and Committees
• Private External Auditors
• Internal Auditors incl. CionActors
•Commission
•Parliament
•Council
•European Council
•ECB
•ECA
•ECJ
•Committees
•> 40 agencies
•EIB & EIF
•Partnerships of many
kinds
•National, regional,
local authorities
•Beneficiaries – 8
million for CAP alone
Accountability to:
•750+ MEPs
•European Council and Council
(10 configurations)
•9,500 national parliamentarians
•Regional Governments & Parliaments
•>500 million people
Situation
EU accountability is a complex, enormous industry…
no surprise to hear that there are Gaps, Overlaps, or Deficits
Questions addressed?
Page 4
EU Executive Parliament
Audit
6 areas facing challenges
Intergovernmental activities involve EU institutions, but rely on
fragmented scrutiny
Europe 2020, European Semester, TSCG, ESM
Different groups of MS participating in different policy areas require complex governance and scrutiny structures
Audit limited to stage where funds paid over. Scrutiny depends on quality of partners
own governance and accountability systems
Institutions, bodies and agencies have inconsistent and disproportionate levels of audit and parliamentary scrutiny
Particularly for expenditure under shared management frontline governance and scrutiny remains weak at MS level
Strategies, laws and regulations require a comprehensive form of assessment of impact, outcomes and results
Euro and Eurozone, Schengen area
UN, World Bank, PPPs, 3rd Countries
Institutions, Agencies, JUs, ECB, EIB
Shared Management in MS
Ex-post assessments, Laws, Regulations, etc
Banking crisis
Sovereign debt crisis
Euro crisis
Economic crisis
Crisis of confidence
EU response to financial crisis
Impact of crisis response
More and new:
•bodies and structures with different arrangements
•uses of and demands on existing structures
•sets of rules
•mix of EU and non-EU instruments
Public perceptions of EU (and national) systems damaged
5 tracks for reflection
Page 8
Way forward
• No simple solutions
• Engage actors at all levels: local, member state, regional, EU and more
• Address existing problems
• Build new initiatives with accountability in mind – use known models where possible
Page 10
A loss of citizens trust occurs when…
Powers and Complexity of the EU
are out of balance with the
Accountability and Legitimacy of the EU
Page 11
Citizens trust is restored when…
A NEWACCOUNTABILITY EQUILIBRIUM