landscape architecture: vickrey 2011 portfolio
DESCRIPTION
Jaime Vickrey's 2011 Portfolio upon completion of MLA degree from Kansas State University in May of 2011TRANSCRIPT
jaime vickrey land
scap
e ar
chite
ctur
e
resu
me
dow
ntow
n re
trofi
t
urba
n la
nd in
stitu
te c
ompe
tition
cons
erva
tion
com
mun
itych
idho
od d
evel
opm
ent c
ente
r
stor
mw
ater
man
agem
ent
hybr
id le
arni
ng la
ndsc
ape
elem
enta
ry
historic downtown manhatt an
Manhatt an, Kansas’ rapid projected populati on growth will increase demand for housing and encourage the current trend of suburban sprawl into un-touched nati ve prairie. Outward expansion decreases populati on density, increases traffi c, and marginalizes older areas of town. Many of Manhatt an’s downtown neighborhoods have not realized their full potenti al to accommo-date more residents, augment pedestrian and bike use, and enhance identi ty.
Downtown Retrofi t of Historic Manhatt an, Kansas
density- reversing urban sprawl mobility- biking and green space
identi ty- historic core
The 9.2 acre project site located downtown reveals potenti al for infi ll de-velopment that could include mixed use, increased pedestrian mobility and enhanced identi ty for the neglected historic core of the city. Major improve-ments include widened sidewalks, designated bicycle lanes, extended store hours for buildings with shops on the fi rst fl oor and programmed commu-nity acti viti es.
proposed evening atmosphere
dow
ntow
n re
trofi
t
dow
ntow
n re
trofi
t
The proposed master plan capitalizes on the existi ng traditi onal infrastructure including the street grid and architectural character. Strategic architectural retrofi tti ng was planned based on historic preservati on requirements, existi ng building use, property values and desired mixed use percentage of the site. Phasing was determined by land value, profi tability and existi ng property ownership that would most effi ciently allow for the complete build out of the proposed plan.
master plan 0’ 200’ 400’ 800’
N
1” = 400’- 0”
historic downtown manhatt anDowntown Retrofi t of Historic Manhatt an, Kansas
18’ 4’ 14’ 16’ 16’ 14’ 4’ 14’
proposed secti on view of downtown manhatt an
highmed-high
med-lowlow (e) buildings
preserved retail public parkingresidenti al offi ce hotel
proposed density proposed landuse
phase 1: retail phase 3: retail + offi cephase 2: residenti al phase 4: offi ce
proposed phasing
caterpillar knoll secti on NTS
building zone
sandbox zone
egg-ucati on zone
grass knoll zone
infant zone
conceptual master plan
NN
1” = 16’- 0”0’ 8’ 16’ 32’
hydrotech growing media detail NTS
building bridges outdoor discovery
Building Bridges Outdoor Discovery was a pro bono design-build project com-pleted during a summer internship at Golden Associates Landscape Architects. Conceptual design, dimensioning, sensory planti ng, irrigati on, details, plan and cost esti mate were included in the two-week design process. The 2,315 square foot courtyard atop Building Bridges Child Development Center was designed based on an environmental educati on program for infants and toddlers. Esti mated constructi on and material cost is $35,000.
Roof-Top Child Development Center in Oakland, California
Visually representi ng the lifecycle of a butt erfl y, the space off ers developmen-tally appropriate acti vity zones and features that can be implemented through phasing that allows the space to fully functi on at all stages of constructi on. Features include designated learning and play zones, art ti led and tree stump seati ng, bamboo playhouse, trike path, turf knoll, embankment slide, planter boxes and a sandbox water trough.
site photo
raised planter boxes
TM
child
hood
dev
elop
men
t cen
ter
Conservati on Community Development of Manhatt an, Kansasstagg hill development
Stagg Hill Development was a studio project exploring the possibility for a conservati on community located near the southwest city limit of Manhatt an, Kansas on 31.5 acres. Prairie restorati on, forest preservati on and stormwater management were focuses for the sustainable design. Major site features include 44 single family homes, 6 town homes, a community club house and recreati onal trails and pedestrian linkages.
conceptual sketches
soils
hill shade
topography
drainage
suitability
site inventory and analysis master plan
community garden
single family home
town home
restored prairie
club house
recreati onal trail
preserved forest
N
1” = 120’- 0”0’ 60’ 120’ 240’
A
A
everes drive
lycaena drive
papil
io lan
e
danaus lane
1” = 120’- 0”0’ 60’ 120’ 240’
cons
erva
ti on
com
mun
ity
cons
erva
tion
com
mun
ity
Earthwork Estimation: Average End Area Methodstagg hill development
Minimizing grading reduces the impact of human presence on the site while allowing the natural drainage to be sustained where possible. Minimiz-ing infrastructure costs was achieved by implementing best management practices such as bioswales and stormwater retention areas. Horizontal and vertical road alignment was necessary to site the primary and secondary roads within the development. Other services included in the scope were proposal writing and estimate of fees.
earthwork diagram
C1 524.59 F1 1657.89 K1 N/AC2 163.06 F2 15.03 K2 N/A
Total Sub Cut Area= C1..C10 687.65
Total Sub Fill Area= F1..F10 1672.92
Total K Area= K1..K10 0.00
Adjusted for KTotal Sub Cut Area
=( C1..C10)+( K1..K10)687.65
Section Vertical Exaggeration 10.00 Section Vertical Exaggeration 10.00Corrected Sub Cut Area
sq.ft.=Total Cut / Vert.Exag.
68.77Corrected Sub Fill Area
sq.ft.=Total Cut / Vert.Exag.
167.29
SectionSub Cut Area(s) sq.ft.
2+34.82 Sub Fill Area(s) sq.ft. K (Cut in Fill Area)
Sub Cut Volume for Sections
Corrected Sub Cut Areas sq.ft.
Average Sub Cut Area sq.ft.
= (Sta1+Sta2) / 2
Distance Between Sections
Sub Cut Volumecu.ft.
=Avg Cut Area * Dist.
Sub Cut Volume cu.yds.
=Cut Volume / 27
2+34.82 68.772+66.77 238.84
Sub Fill Volume for Sections
Corrected Sub Fill Areas
sq.ft.
Average Sub Fill Area sq.ft.
= (Sta1+Sta2) / 2
Distance Between Sections
Sub Fill Volume cu.ft.
Sub Fill Volumecu.yds.
=Fill Volume / 272+34.82 167.292+66.77 182.31
153.80 31.95 4913.989875 182.00
174.80 31.95 5584.812075 206.84
C1 2264.64 F1 1813.71 K1 N/AC2 123.76 F2 9.34 K2 N/A
Total Sub Cut Area= C1..C10 2388.40
Total Sub Fill Area= F1..F10 1823.05
Total K Area= K1..K10 0.00
Adjusted for KTotal Sub Cut Area
=( C1..C10)+( K1..K10)2388.40
Section Vertical Exaggeration 10.00 Section Vertical Exaggeration 10.00Corrected Sub Cut Area
sq.ft.=Total Cut / Vert.Exag.
238.84Corrected Sub Fill Area
sq.ft.=Total Cut / Vert.Exag.
182.31
SectionSub Cut Area(s) sq.ft.
2+66.77 Sub Fill Area(s) sq.ft. K (Cut in Fill Area)
Sub Cut Volume for Sections
Corrected Sub Cut Areas sq.ft.
Average Sub Cut Area sq.ft.
= (Sta1+Sta2) / 2
Distance Between Sections
Sub Cut Volumecu.ft.
=Avg Cut Area * Dist.
Sub Cut Volume cu.yds.
=Cut Volume / 27
2+66.77 238.842+93.49 461.54
Sub Fill Volume for Sections
Corrected Sub Fill Areas
sq.ft.
Average Sub Fill Area sq.ft.
= (Sta1+Sta2) / 2
Distance Between Sections
Sub Fill Volume cu.ft.
Sub Fill Volumecu.yds.
=Fill Volume / 272+66.77 182.312+93.49 160.20
350.19 26.72 9357.0768 346.56
171.25 26.72 4575.84008 169.48
C1 4539.5 F1 28.05 K1 N/AC2 12.73 F2 1567.86 K2 N/AC3 63.17 F3 6.07 K3 N/A
Total Sub Cut Area= C1..C10 4615.40
Total Sub Fill Area= F1..F10 1601.98
Total K Area= K1..K10 0.00
Adjusted for KTotal Sub Cut Area
=( C1..C10)+( K1..K10)4615.40
Section Vertical Exaggeration 10.00 Section Vertical Exaggeration 10.00Corrected Sub Cut Area
sq.ft.=Total Cut / Vert.Exag.
461.54Corrected Sub Fill Area
sq.ft.=Total Cut / Vert.Exag.
160.20
SectionSub Cut Area(s) sq.ft.
2+93.49 Sub Fill Area(s) sq.ft. K (Cut in Fill Area)
Sub Cut Volume for Sections
Corrected Sub Cut Areas sq.ft.
Average Sub Cut Area sq.ft.
= (Sta1+Sta2) / 2
Distance Between Sections
Sub Cut Volumecu.ft.
=Avg Cut Area * Dist.
Sub Cut Volume cu.yds.
=Cut Volume / 27
2+93.49 461.543+36.74 54.23
Sub Fill Volume for Sections
Corrected Sub Fill Areas
sq.ft.
Average Sub Fill Area sq.ft.
= (Sta1+Sta2) / 2
Distance Between Sections
Sub Fill Volume cu.ft.
Sub Fill Volumecu.yds.
=Fill Volume / 272+93.49 160.203+36.74 138.09
257.89 43.25 11153.52625 413.09
149.15 43.25 6450.5645 238.91
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
LEO
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
LC
LC
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
NC
/NF
earthwork sections section AA: through trails and restored prairie NTS
horizontal alignment plan NTS
stor
mw
ater
man
agem
ent
Senior Living Complex of Topeka, Kansaslakeview village
Exposed pipelines
Sedement is building up and promoting the growth of Typha (cattails). Efforts have been made by excavat-ing yet unsuccessful.
Dense vegetation
Need for a new underground drain. Existing is deteriorated. Consult engineers for specifica-tions.
Utility Lines:-Transcontinental cable-Petrolium pipeline-Buried fiberoptic cable-Natural gas pipeline
Extreme erosion problems. This area is in need of erosion control by slowing runoff and bank stabilization. Tie into other trail systems of two other focus areas.
Possible redeveloped roadway. Area floods extensively after heavy rainfall.
Sedement is building up and promoting the and promoting the growth of Typha (cattails). Efforts have been made by excavat-ing yet unsuccessful.
Need for a new underground Need for a new underground drain. Existing is deteriorated. Consult engineers for specifica-tions.
Utility-Transcontinental cable-Petrolium pipeline-Buried fiberoptic cable-Natural gas pipeline
Extreme erosion problems. This area is in need of erosion control by slowing runoff and bank stabilization. Tie into other trail systems of two other focus areas.into other trail systems of two other focus areas.into other trail systems of two
Exposed pipelines
Extreme erosion problems.
Possible redeveloped roadway. Area floods extensively after heavy rainfall.
Enjoyable views over the lake.
Sedement is building up Sedement is building up Sedement is building up
Possible shoreline stabilization.
Lakeview Village Lenexa, KSSite Inventory & Analysis
Prof. Lee Skabelund LAR 410Jaime Vickrey & Felipe DeNarvaez
Ephemeral creeks floods during heavy rainfall. Storm culvert deteriorated promotes flooding.
gathering space
intermitt ent stream corridor
boardwalk
rain garden
fl ood plain
wet meadow
trail
site analysis
Lakeview Village of Topeka, Kansas is a senior living community that consists of 95 acres with 600+ homes and 800+ residents that adusts to all stages of aging seniors. The site is bisected by a major uti lity infrastructure easement which restricts de-velopment in the area. Extreme stormwater management issues include fl ooding, erosion and exposed infrastructure. Group members include myself and Felipe DeNarvaez.
bank stabilizati on
pedestrian accessibility
nature trail perspecti ve
stor
mw
ater
man
agem
ent
Nati ve Planti ng Palett elakeview village
scienti fi c name common name
Iris Virginica Blue Flag
Justi cia americana Water Willow
Hibiscus laevis Smooth Rose Mallow
Leersia oryzoides Rice Cut Grass
Sparganium eurycarpum Common Bur Reed
Scirpus fl uviati lis River Bulrush
Carex comosa Bristly Sedge
Eupatorium maculatum Spott ed Joe-Pye Weed
Eleocharis ovata Blunt Spike Rush
Nassella trichotoma Serrated Tussock
Carex lurida Sallow Sedge
intermitt ent stream corridor
scienti fi c name common name
Koeleria pyramidata June Grass
Panicum virgatum Switch Grass
Elymus canadensis Canada Wild Rye
Agalinis tenuifolia Slender False Foxglove
Dalea candida White Prairie Clover
Rati bida pinnata Yellow Conefl ower
Schizachyrium scoparium Litt le Bludstem
Bouteloua curti pendula Side-Oats Grama
Salix interior Shrub Willow
Amorpha fruti cosa Indigo Bush
Cephalanthus occidentalis Butt on Bush
fl ood plain
scienti fi c name common name
Sorghastrum nutans Indian Grass
Asclepias tuberosa Butt erfl y milkweed
Pycnanthemum virginianum Common Mountain Mint
Rudbeckia hirta Black-eyed Susan
Bouteloua curti pendula Side-Oats Grama
Elymus canadensis Canada Wild Rye
Panicum virgatum Switch Grass
scienti fi c name common name
Avena sati va Common Oat
Lolium multi fl orum Annnual Rye
Cluster Blue Flag and Smooth Rose Mallow close to
banks nearest fl ood plain in visible areas.
Common Oats and Annual Rye should be broadcast
aft er excavati on to help reduce erosion and increase
aestheti c appeal.
notes
wet meadow
temporary cover
urba
n la
nd in
sti tu
te c
ompe
ti ti o
n
Transforming San Diego’s East Village- Celebrati ng our Faults
The 2010 Urban Land Insti tute/ Gerald D. Hines Student Urban Design Competi ti on is a multi disci-plinary competi ti on that challenges students to devise a comprehensive design and development pro-gram over a two week period for a real, large-scale site that incorporates challenges and opportuniti es.
urban land insti tute competi ti on
east village in context
East Village in San Diego, California, rests on top of acti ve and passive fault lines, has a declining economy and contains many buildings that need re-purposing within the 73 acre site. Our team goal was to celebrate these “faults” and revamp the surrounding community, incorporati ng sustainability, mobility and mixed-use for a variety of income levels. Maintaining the existi ng culture while creati ng a new identi ty for East Village was both a challenge and opportunity. Team members include myself, Brad Mascal (Architecture), Cynthia Wiederholt (Architecture), Heather Grogan (Landscape Architec-ture) and Zachary Ransom (Finance).
character montage
concept development
open public spacefault lines
phase 1phase 2phase 3phase 4
structures to demolishstructures to maintainsurrounding context
views to maintainvehicular Circulati onacti vity Nodes
open public spacefault lines
phase 1phase 2phase 3phase 4
structures to demolishstructures to maintainsurrounding context
views to maintainvehicular Circulati onacti vity Nodes
link
celebrate
faults
resulti ng concept- celebrati ng our faults
site strategies
urba
n la
nd in
sti tu
te c
ompe
ti ti o
n
Transforming San Diego’s East Village: Celebrati ng our Faultsurban land insti tute competi ti on
secti on of adonis complex- facing west0’ 50’ 100’ 200’
base isolatorsgeo-thermal heati ngpermeable pavinggreywater fountainpassive coolinggreen roofunderground parkingretailresidenti aloffi cetech fl ex
perspecti ve of karme market
1” = 100’- 0”
ground plane verti cal exaggerati on x10
master plan
A
A B
C
0’ 200’ 400’ 800’
N
1” = 400’- 0”
A. circe link-A pedestrian trail and bike path that connects stu-dents, residents and visitors to the transit stati on and to Karme Market. B. karme market-Serves as a farmer’s market and acti ve open green space for the community.
C. adonis complex-The complex is composed of housing, offi ces and retail during the day and transiti ons to acti ve night life aft er hours.
land use diagram
retail/offi ce
mixed-use
residenti al
public faciliti es
open space
hotel
tech fl ex/retail
residenti al/tech fl ex
legend
hybr
id le
arni
ng la
ndsc
ape
elem
enta
ry
hybrid learning landscape framework
MontClair Elementary’s 3.5 acre campus is located in Oakland, California and serves 420 Kindergarten through fi ft h grade students. Student populati on is projected to increase to 600 by 2012 which will not be supported by existi ng faciliti es. Therefore, the Oakland Unifi ed School District awarded the school a ten million dollar bond to upgrade the facili-ti es and schoolyard.
Site issues addressed through design improve the campus unity, identi ty, aestheti cs and functi onality. Major Issues include a weak link between curriculum and schoolyard, lack of shade and accessible vegetati on, awkward asphalt terracing of the site, heat island eff ect and weed control.
snake in the grass concept
holisti c high performance schools for comprehensive learning and play
school jurisdicti on boundary
regional context
trail linkage gap
jurisdicti on boundary
oakland, california
park space
montclair elementary
montclair rr trail
contextual diagrams
To provide students with a holisti c high performance school, both the interior and exterior school environment should be uti lized for comprehensive learning and play. Through analysis and synthesis of University Colorado Denver’s Learning Landscapes Program and California’s Collaborati ve for High Performance Schools Program (CHPS), a hybrid learn-ing landscape framework was formed. The framework principles were then applied to MontClair Elementary and resulted in a curriculum inspired school environment that links students, community and nature.
site secti on
master plan
bioswale zone perspecti ve acti ve balance and climb and zone perspecti ve
0’ 60’ 120’ 240’ N1” = 120’- 0”
644
589589
dilemma
research & analyze
mappsketchmodel
makmontag
layerdatascap
ideating
”If process drives outcomes we may not know where we are going, but we know we want to be there,” Bruce Mau 1998.
thesis
conceptual thinking- anything goes
re�ne concepts- back to reality
production mode- synthesis
evaluate- solve dilemma & achieve thesis?
�nal product
1401 College Ave. Apt. E108Manhattan, KS 66502(816) [email protected]
educationMaster’s of Landscape ArchitectureKansas State University I Manhattan, KSgraduation: May 2011
Bachelor’s of Plant Science / Architecture MinorUniversity of Missouri I Columbia, MOgraduation: May 2008
professional experienceGolden Associates I Oakland, CA I May 2010 - August 2010Landscape Architecture Intern • Led a Pro Bono Green Roof Project Through The Design Process• Generated Construction Documents• Participated in Design Charettes & Company Meetings
Kansas State University I Manhattan, KS I August 2010 - May 2011Teaching Assistant- Natural Systems & Site Analysis, Site Planning• Presented and Critiqued Design Presentations• Mentored Research Teams and Led Site Visits• Critiqued Student Design Work and Managed Online Website
Rost Landscaping I Columbia, MO I April 2007 - August 2007Design Team Intern & Maintenance Division Employee• Drafted Residential Planting Designs• Installed & Maintained Residential/Commercial Landscapes • Custom Designed Planter Containers
UMC Division of Plant Sciences I Columbia, MO I May 2006 - August 2008 Greenhouse Staff, Tiger Garden Floral Shop Employee & Teaching Assistant• Administered Tests, Graded Papers & Managed Files• Propagated & Watered Plants• Arranged Flowers & Designed Window Displays
jaime vickreyResume
international experienceNew Zealand Study Abroad I Christchurch, Lincoln, Canterbury I December 2007 - January 2008Student• Studied Agriculture & Environmental Sciences• Researched and Analyzed Landscape Management Practices• Toured Landscapes & Local Industries
organizations/activities • ASLA, student & national member I August 2008 - current• Sigma Alpha Lambda Honors Sorority, member I June 2009 - current• Urban Land Institute Competition I January 2010• Design Workshop Design Week I August 2009•
softwareMicrosoft Office 2010 • Word, PowerPoint & ExcelAdobe CS5 Design Premium• Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign & BridgeArcGISAutoCAD Civil 3D 2010/2011Google SketchUp Pro 8
resu
me