landegger | baron | lavenant | ingber advice - solutions - litigation wage & hour claims,...

45
LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With Success June 2011 Presented by Al Landegger & Michael S. Lavenant

Upload: toni-crass

Post on 28-Mar-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBERAdvice - Solutions - Litigation

WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS

IN CALIFORNIA

Managing Employees With Success

June 2011Presented by

Al Landegger & Michael S. Lavenant

Page 2: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

TOP THREE WAGE AND HOUR CLAIMS YOU SHOULD EXPECT TO BE SUED FOR AND HOW TO AVOID

CLAIMS1. Overtime

MisclassificationUnpaid OvertimeOff The Clock Work

2. Meal & Rest Periods3. Unreimbursed Expenses

Page 3: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

TOP THREE WAGE AND HOUR CLAIMS YOU SHOULD EXPECT TO BE SUED FOR AND HOW TO AVOID

LITIGATIONTopics to be coveredWage & Hour Class Actions

Reasons class actions for wage and hour claims are increasing

Significant decisionsUnique issues for wage and hour claimsPreventative advice and strategic litigation issues

MisclassificationStandard Exemptions

Off the Clock WorkDonning & DonningPreliminary & PostliminaryAutomatic deductions

Meal & Rest PeriodsUnreimbursed Expenses

Page 4: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Explosion of Wage & Hour Class Actions

Reasons for Increase:Eight-Hour-Day Restoration and

Workplace Flexibility Act of 1999Private Attorney General Act of 2004Class Action Fairness Act of 2005Revised FLSA RegulationsKey Court DecisionsAttractive Court Verdicts/Settlements

Page 5: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Appellate Court Decisions

Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products (2000) 23 Cal.4th 163 [4 Year SOL]

Bell v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 805 [Production/Administrative Dichotomy]

IBP v. Alvarez (2005) 546 US 21 [Donning & Doffing]

Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions(2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094 [Labor Code 226.7 Wage/Penalty]

Page 6: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Appellate Court Decisions

White v. Starbucks (2007) 497 F.Supp.2d 1080 [Permit and authorize meal periods]

Brinker Restaurants v. Superior Court(2008) [State court recognizes flexibility in meal and rest periods as well as employee time keeping requirements]

Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers (2007) 42 Cal.4th 554 [Alternative methods of expense reimbursement approved]

Schachter v. Citigroup (2009) 47 Cal.4th 610[Economic realities of compensation agreement controls]

Page 7: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Unique Issues InWage & Hour Claims

Burden is on employer to establish exemptions and record hours worked

Employer must also force employees to take unwanted meal periods

Vast difference between FLSA and California Labor Code

Confusing laws and Labor Commissioner interpretations

Technical violations create liabilityMost laws provide for recovery of attorneys’

fees to employees, not employers

Page 8: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Example of ExposureLabor Code Section 226 requires 9 items:

Gross wagesTotal hours workedPiece rate and number of unitsAll deductionsNet wagesPay periodName of employee and EIN or last 4 digits

of SSNName and address of employerAll hourly rates and hours worked for

each rateMissing any one above can result in

penalties [$50/$100/$4000]

Page 9: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Overtime Rules

• Preliminary Considerations:– “Workday” and “Workweek”– “Workday” is defined as “any

consecutive 24-hour period commencing at the same time each calendar day.”

– A “workweek” is “any 7 consecutive days, starting with the same calendar day each week.” A “workweek” is a “fixed and regularly recurring period of 168 hours, 7 consecutive 24-hour periods.”

Page 10: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Overtime Rules

• Preliminary Considerations:– “Shift” is defined as “designated hours of

work by an employee, with a designated beginning time and quitting time.” This has ramifications, particularly with respect to alternative workweeks.

– Once the workweek is established, it cannot be changed unless the change is intended to be permanent and not designed to evade overtime requirements. Each workweek stands alone, and simply having a 2-week pay period does not allow the employer to average the 2 weeks’ hours.

Page 11: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Overtime Rules

• Generally, premium pay to non-exempt employees in California is required in five different situations:– Over 8 hours of work in a work day (time

and one-half)– Over 40 hours of work in a workweek

(also consistent with federal law) (time and one-half)

Page 12: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Overtime Rules

• Cont. – The first 8 hours of work on the 7th

consecutive day of work in a workweek (time and one-half) (note that the employee must work all 7 days in the workweek: merely working 7 consecutive days, if the days cross over into another workweek, will not qualify the employee for the 7th day premium)

– Over 12 hours of work in a work day (double time)

– Over 8 hours of work on a 7th consecutive day in a workweek (double time) (private employers only)

Page 13: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Overtime Rules

• Cont. – Federal law only has a 40-hour week. – “Anti-pyramiding” rules provide that

employers need not combine more than one rate of overtime compensation (example: employee works 42 hours in a week, including 10 hours on one day). The 41st and 42nd hour must be compensated, but they will be deemed equivalent to the 9th and 10th hour on the one day of overtime worked, so only one set of overtime need be paid.

Page 14: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Overtime Rules

• Limited Exceptions for Overtime:– Alternative Workweek Schedules

• Employees may be allowed a set schedule or menu of options that would allow employees to work up to 10 hours in a day (no more than 40 hours in a workweek) without the payment of overtime.

– Make-up Time provisions• Employee is allowed to work up to 11 hours in a

day without overtime payment if they are “making up” time they lost in the SAME WORKWEEK due to personal circumstances.

• Employee must make the request – Employer is not permitted to coerce or intimidate employees in their decision.

• Employers are permitted to have a policy and form.

Page 15: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Which Wage Order?

• Which Wage Order Applies - IWC Classifications– Industry vs. Occupational Wage

Order– Industry Wage Order - Wage Order

1-3, 5-13 are “industry” wage orders.• These wage orders cover ALL

employees of companies that conduct business within a particular industry - even office or administrative staff.

• If the business is comprised of several industries, more than one wage order may be applicable to the different portions of the integrated business.

Page 16: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Which Wage Order?

• Which Wage Order Applies - IWC Classifications– If a business is not covered by a particular

“industry” as defined in the wage order, then an occupational order may apply.

– Occupation Wage Order - Wage Order 4, 14-17 are occupational wage orders.• These wage orders cover only particular jobs. • Wage Order 16 and 17 are new to California

and cover industry that previously may have been exempted from the wage orders.

• Businesses that are not subject to an “industry” wage order may be covered by more than one occupational wage order.

Page 17: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Misclassification

• There are only three major overtime exemptions in California.– Executive– Administrative– Professional

• These are similar BUT DIFFERENT under federal law.

• Employer must comply with the one that provides the most protection for the employee.

• The job description is helpful, but only the start of the analysis.

Page 18: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Misclassification

• These three exemptions are similar BUT DIFFERENT under federal law.

• Employer must comply with the one that provides the most protection for the employee.

• The job description is helpful, but only the start of the analysis.

Page 19: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Misclassification

• Executive Exemption:– Salary Test:

• Must earn salary minimum of $33,280.• Employee is paid for QUALITY of work

not QUANTITY of work.– Duties Test:

• Supervise 2 or more employees.• Exercise discretion and independent

judgment in management.• Must be engaged in these activities

more than 50% of their time.

Page 20: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Misclassification

• Administrative Exemption:– Salary Test:

• Must earn salary minimum of $33,280.• Employee is paid for QUALITY of work

not QUANTITY of work.– Duties Test:

• Provide direction on the operations of the enterprise – not the service or sale of goods.

• Exercise discretion and independent judgment.

• Must be engaged in these activities more than 50% of their time.

Page 21: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Misclassification

• Professional Exemption:– Salary Test:

• Must earn salary minimum of $33,280.• Employee is paid for QUALITY of work

not QUANTITY of work.– Duties Test:

• Must be licensed in one of the enumerated professions recognized by the State of California.

• Exercise discretion and independent judgment.

• Must be engaged in these activities more than 50% of their time.

Page 22: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Misclassification

• Salesperson Exemption:– Outside Sales:

• Employee is completely exempt from overtime.

• Employee is also exempt from meal and rest periods.

• Employee must spend more than one-half of their time outside of office.

Page 23: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Misclassification

• Salesperson Exemption:– Inside Sales:

• Employee may be exempt from overtime.

• Must earn at least one and one-half times the minimum wage for all hours worked and more than half of that employee’s compensation represents commissions.

• Still subject to all other protections – meal and rest breaks.

Page 24: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Misclassification

• Special Rules for Out of State Employees:– Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.:

• California Supreme Court is reviewing issue of whether non-exempt employee that is based outside of California but performs work in California is entitled to overtime pursuant to California law or the federal Fair Labor Standards Act which does not:

– Require premium unless the employee works more than 40 hours in a week

– Require meal or rest periods• May also have an impact on “borderline” FLSA-

exempt employees who would be classified as non-exempt employees in California.

Page 25: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Timekeeping

• Off-The-Clock Work– Employer’s obligation to record all time

worked.– Employee should be directed not to

perform work that is not accounted for in the timecard.

– Employee should sign timecard, acknowledging true and accurate recordkeeping.

– Travel Time– Training, meetings, lectures, conferences.– NOTE: Employee can have different rates

for different type of work – such as travel time at minimum wage.

Page 26: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Timekeeping

• Unauthorized Overtime– Employees who work unauthorized

overtime MUST be paid premium pay, but can be disciplined.

Page 27: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Preliminary & Postliminary

Donning and doffing Preparing equipment Security screening

Page 28: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Donning & Doffing

• Conflicting authority as to whether donning/doffing “protected gear” is a principal activity.

• DOL--if the employer requires donning and doffing of protective gear at the employer’s premises then it is a principal activity.

• …whether required gear is ‘unique’ or ‘non-unique’ is irrelevant to the principal activity analysis.

Page 29: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Donning & Doffing• Ninth Circuit: “This ‘integral and indispensable’

conclusion extends to donning, doffing and cleaning of non-unique gear (e.g., hardhats) and unique gear (e.g., Kevlar gloves) alike.”

• Tenth Circuit: donning and doffing safety glasses, earplugs, hard hat, and safety shoes, “although essential to the job, and required by the employer,” were non-compensable pre- and postliminary activities.

• Second Circuit: “[t]he donning and doffing of generic protective gear is not rendered integral by being required by the employer or by government regulations…nuclear power plant employees need not be paid for time spent donning and doffing a helmet, safety glasses, and safety boots before and after their work shifts.

Page 30: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Preparing Equipment

• Truck drivers entitled to compensation for such pre-trip activities as loading their trucks and conducting a pre-trip inspection of their vehicles.

• Employees who use service vehicles may also be entitled to compensation for time spent loading and unloading the vehicle, fueling, and cleaning the vehicle where such tasks are necessary part of the job.

• Note – New 9th Circuit decision in Rutti v. Lojack concerns at-home preparation and use of company vehicles.

Page 31: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Security Screening

• Security screening activities may be necessary or “indispensable,” BUT they are not necessarily “integral” to the principal work and thus not compensable.

• Construction workers need not be paid for time spent passing through airport security because such a security regime was required by law and did not benefit the employer.

Page 32: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Automatic Deductions

• If the employee only clocks in at the start of the shift and clocks out at the end, the employer may be liable for unpaid wages if deduction was made by employer for break but break was never taken, or taken in the full amount.

• Some employers automatically deduct from employees’ wages an amount for a non-compensable break or meal period.

• California law and the FLSA requires that employees be compensated for all time worked.

Page 33: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Breaks

• Meal Periods:– Employee must receive 30-minute, duty-

free meal period if they work more than 5 hours in a workday.

– Period may be waived by mutual consent if the employee works 6 hours or less.

– Absent exigent circumstances, period can not be waived if employee works more than 6 hours.

– Employer should permit and authorize employee to take meal period.

– Meal period starting and stopping times should be documented.

Page 34: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Breaks

• Meal Periods:– Employee who works 5 hours or less is not

required to have a meal period.– Until the California Supreme Court decides the

Brinker Restaurants decision, the requisite meal period should not be taken at a time when the employee will work more than 5 hours after returning from the first meal period without taking a second meal period.

– A second meal period is required if an employee works more than 10 hours.

– If more than 10, but less than 12, second meal period can be waived by written agreement if the first meal period was taken.

Page 35: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Breaks

• Rest Periods:– Employee must receive 10-minute,

duty-free rest period for every 4 hours of work, or major fraction thereof.

– Employer should permit and authorize employee to take rest period.

– Rest periods and meal period cannot be pooled.

– Rest period starting and stopping times do not have to be documented.

Page 36: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Employee Expenses

• Labor Code Section 2802:– Provides that all expenses

necessarily incurred by the employee in discharge of their duties to the employer must be reimbursed. • Use of Personal Automobile –

Reimburse IRS rate.• Cell phone.• Personal computer or office equipment.• Uniforms.• Meals and Entertainment.• Liability.

Page 37: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Preventative Solutions

Conduct internal audit to determine areas of potential exposureReview job descriptions/classificationsFollow record keeping requirementsReview payroll practices

Prepare & Regularly Review Employee Handbook

Review and understand applicable wage ordersTrain HR personnelEnforce meal/rest period policies

Page 38: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Preventative SolutionsDevelop timekeeping proceduresDevelop reimbursement policies

UniformsMileageTools & Equipment

Consider varying evaluations, job descriptions, standards, rules and procedures by location or individuals

Communicate legal requirements to employees

Page 39: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Use of Experts

• Several types of professionals can assist in the avoidance or defense of these claims:– Current management personnel– Timekeeping and Payroll companies– Legal counsel– Financial advisors– CPAs/Accountants– Other labor consultants or experts

Page 40: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Use of Experts• Current Personnel

– Management level employees have unique knowledge concerning the application of company policies to day-to-day operations.

– Supervisory employees are aware of the existence of information relevant to the claims.

– Employees may have unique knowledge to impeach claimants.

Page 41: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Use of Experts

• Timekeeping and Payroll Companies– May provide guidance on overtime

issues;– May provide assistance on meal and

rest period penalties; or– May assume liability for errors.

Page 42: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Use of Experts

• Legal Counsel– Competent employment law counsel

should be engaged from the beginning.– Key in providing necessary detection and

avoidance training to HR, management and other supervisory personnel.

– Prompt evaluation of claims will assist company in making an informed decision.

– Issues of jurisdiction, forum, venue, or pleadings present at the outset of the case may impact outcome.

Page 43: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Use of Experts• CPAs/Accountants/Financial Advisors

– Accountants may have records concerning payroll.

– Assist in defending against claims that expenses were properly reimbursed.

– Have ability to conduct exposure analysis.

– Interpret financial stability of company to play a part in negotiated or court-approved settlement.

– Financial Advisors provide benefit programs that create satisfied employees.

Page 44: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Use of Experts• HR/Labor Consultants

– Can provide input as to the exempt status of employees named in claim.

– Can determine if meal and rest periods are being followed.

– Analyze whether all required expenses are being reimbursed properly.

• Information Technology– Forensic experts can assist in locating

documents vital to a defense even if it has been deleted.

– Forensic experts can also play a role in meeting the obligation to preserve all electronic evidence and search for relevant data.

Page 45: LANDEGGER | BARON | LAVENANT | INGBER Advice - Solutions - Litigation WAGE & HOUR CLAIMS, CONCERNS & CLASS ACTIONS IN CALIFORNIA Managing Employees With

Q & A

Questions?For more information contact:Alfred J. Landegger, [email protected]

Michael S. Lavenant, [email protected]

LANDEGGER BARON LAVENANT & INGBER15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200Encino, California 91436

751 Daily Drive, Suite 325Camarillo, California 93010

Los Angeles Office: 818.986.7561Ventura County Office: 805.987.7128