lab 4: forces and vectors - san francisco state universityjfielder/20lforcetable.pdf ·  ·...

3
Lab 4: Forces and Vectors Equipment: Force Table and Accessories, 50 Gr. Hanger, Assorted masses The goal of this lab is to put a system into equilibrium by predicting a balancing force using both a graphical and component methods. Use only graph or the protractor paper to plot the vectors. Part I Predictions: Balancing 3 Forces Using the graphical method (also called tip-to-tail method), find the resultant vector R = A + B where A=(600.0 grams, 30.0º) and B= (400.0 grams, 130.0º). Use a scale of 1 mm = 10 grams. Using a ruler and a protractor, accurately draw R = A + B and then measure the magnitude and angle of R. How many significant figures are you keeping and why? Use the component method to calculate the balancing force and compare your results with the graphical method. Your graphical method and component method should agree within a few percent. Include these calculations in your lab report. Record your results in your lab report: Scaled Values for A and B (mm) Predicted Values of R from graphical method Predicted Values from component method Percent Difference Between methods Print out a copy of the protractor paper (the last page of these instructions) and plot your three vectors: A, B, and R. This will serve as a map for Part III. Part II Predictions: Balancing 4 Forces Now repeat the above process for predicting the balancing fourth force with the graphical method when three forces are given: A=(250.0 grams, 30.0º), B= (475.0 grams, 110.0º) and C=(325.0 grams, 300.0º). Use tip-to-tail vector addition. Use the component method to find the balancing force and compare your results with the graphical method. Your graphical method and component method should agree within a percent or two. If they don’t, redo the graphical method more carefully. Include your calculation in your lab. Record your results in your lab report: Scaled Values for A, B, and C (mm) Predicted Values of R from graphical method Predicted Values of R from component method Percent Difference between methods

Upload: ngodieu

Post on 21-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lab 4: Forces and Vectors - San Francisco State Universityjfielder/20Lforcetable.pdf ·  · 2014-09-11Lab 4: Forces and Vectors Equipment: Force Table and Accessories, ... Include

Lab 4: Forces and Vectors

Equipment: Force Table and Accessories, 50 Gr. Hanger, Assorted masses The goal of this lab is to put a system into equilibrium by predicting a balancing force using both a graphical and component methods. Use only graph or the protractor paper to plot the vectors. Part I Predictions: Balancing 3 Forces • Using the graphical method (also called tip-to-tail method), find the resultant vector R =

A + B where A=(600.0 grams, 30.0º) and B= (400.0 grams, 130.0º). Use a scale of 1 mm = 10 grams.

• Using a ruler and a protractor, accurately draw R = A + B and then measure the magnitude and angle of R. How many significant figures are you keeping and why?

• Use the component method to calculate the balancing force and compare your results with the graphical method. Your graphical method and component method should agree within a few percent. Include these calculations in your lab report.

• Record your results in your lab report: Scaled Values for A and B (mm) Predicted Values of R from graphical method Predicted Values from component method Percent Difference Between methods Print out a copy of the protractor paper (the last page of these instructions) and plot your three vectors: A, B, and R. This will serve as a map for Part III.

Part II Predictions: Balancing 4 Forces • Now repeat the above process for predicting the balancing fourth force with the

graphical method when three forces are given: A=(250.0 grams, 30.0º), B= (475.0 grams, 110.0º) and C=(325.0 grams, 300.0º). Use tip-to-tail vector addition.

• Use the component method to find the balancing force and compare your results with the graphical method. Your graphical method and component method should agree within a percent or two. If they don’t, redo the graphical method more carefully. Include your calculation in your lab.

• Record your results in your lab report: Scaled Values for A, B, and C (mm) Predicted Values of R from graphical method Predicted Values of R from component method Percent Difference between methods

Page 2: Lab 4: Forces and Vectors - San Francisco State Universityjfielder/20Lforcetable.pdf ·  · 2014-09-11Lab 4: Forces and Vectors Equipment: Force Table and Accessories, ... Include

Print out a second copy of the protractor paper and plot your four vectors: A, B, C, and R. This will serve as a map for Part III. Part III: The Experimental Test • After you have finished your predictions, show your work to the instructor who will give

you a force table if you are ready to do the test! • On the force table, place pulleys at the positions of vectors. • Pass the strings attached to the central ring through pulleys and hang the appropriate

amount of mass from it. Don’t forget that the hanger itself has a mass of roughly 50 grams.

• If your predictions are correct, all the forces should be balanced and the center pin should be located in the center of the ring.

• If the forces don’t balance, try to find the location and mass of balancing force by trial and error.

• If the forces balance, try perturbing the system by pushing the ring very slightly to one side. Does it (eventually) return to equilibrium?

• Repeat for the 4 forces. • Explain your results in a brief summary.

Page 3: Lab 4: Forces and Vectors - San Francisco State Universityjfielder/20Lforcetable.pdf ·  · 2014-09-11Lab 4: Forces and Vectors Equipment: Force Table and Accessories, ... Include