l5 high five lachman.pptx [read-only] - ihi home...
TRANSCRIPT
11/29/2016
1
HIGH FIVEPeople at the Centre of Improvement
The Five Essentials of Quality Improvement Dr Pat OConnor
Scottish Ambulance Service
Dr Peter Lachman
CEO, The International Society for Quality in Health Care
L5
Sunday, December 4
Key outcomes of today
• Have fun
• Discuss are people at the centre of your healthcare systems…. patients and families and healthcare teams
• Sharing and learning build on what we have
• Your box to go (take away tools) share and exchange
• Make a plan to at least try one new thing you learned
11/29/2016
2
Key content of The High Five
Improving Access Improving Care Improving Outcomes
• Is everything ....islands of excellence
• Where are the bright spots and how do we build on these?
• Strong and loose ties
Context
• Understanding self and others-Team dynamic
• Mindfulness, emotional intelligence: FEELINGS matter at work
• Make the right thing easy to try, easy to do and easy to try!
Making Change Happen
• Improvement science e.g. Model for improvement, lean
• Triple aim (patient experience, ROI, improved clinical outcomes)
• Community asset management
Methods tools and
techniques
•Measurement MATTERS
•Generate light not heat! Measures for improvement
•Dash board of measures- Run and control charts
•Info graphics
Measuring Results
• Deep and broad understanding of what it takes to sustain
change... reliability and resilience in care delivery ..Sensitive to
operations (Safety II )
• Acknowledge and monitor spread
• Celebrate Success
Holding the Gains
O’Connor 2015, Unpublished
11/29/2016
3
People at the Center
Are people at the center of your
service? ….Staff Patients and carers
Lets hear some examples:
Chat to your neighbour
share the ways you think
people are at the centre
of your care system
Changing from
What’s the matter?
To
What matters to you?
• Asking what matters
• Listening to what matters
• Doing what matters
We challenge you to ask the next patient you
care for, ‘what matters to you?’
11/29/2016
4
What matters to you video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-SkAb52f58
Jennifer Rogers on what matters to you
11/29/2016
5
Ask patients and colleagues
Finish the sentence
“…Today would have been better if….”
The 4 principles of person centred care
http://www.health.org.uk/public/cms/75/76/313/4772/Measuring%20what%20really%20matters.pdf?realName=GuxZKx.pdf
Dignity respect
compassion
Coordinated
Personalised
Enabling
11/29/2016
6
What makes the best care experience?
What makes the best
service?
Discuss with your neighbor
what is the best service you
have every had outside
healthcare and why?
People at the centre
Good example you heard
Something you need help with
11/29/2016
7
1 Context
• Is everything ....islands of excellence
• Where are the bright spots and how do
we build on these?
• Strong and loose ties
Professor Paul Bate
Islands of Excellence
• Islands of Excellence in a Sea of Mediocrity
• We are good at everything …….just not
everywhere
• Good examples of improvement …how are
they mapped how do you know?
• Reaching out and encouraging others to reach
in
11/29/2016
8
Looking for the bright spots
Dan Heath
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbLNOS7MxFc
Strong and loose tiesHelen Bevan
• In health and care, most change happens through “strong ties”.
• We are influenced to change by “people like us”, with the same background, interests and experiences as us; change is spread peer-to-peer.
• Yet the best opportunities for breakthrough, radical change comes when we also operate through “weak ties”, connecting with people who aren’t in our usual peer group who bring fresh ideas, influences and perspectives.
http://theedge.nhsiq.nhs.uk/the-strength-of-weak-ties/
11/29/2016
9
Context considerations for change
Context
For quality improvement to flourish it must be
carefully cultivated in a rich soil bed (a receptive
organisation), given constant attention
(sustained leadership), assured of appropriate
amounts
11/29/2016
10
Bate 2014
8 factors of receptive contexts for change
11/29/2016
11
Context within which you work
In your organization what is
helping you to improve and what
is holding you back?
11/29/2016
12
2 Making Change Happen
• Understanding self and others-
• Team dynamic
• Mindfulness
• Emotional intelligence
• FEELINGS matter at work
• Make the right thing easy to
try, easy to do and easy to try!
AIM
Is there an agreed aim that
is understood by every one
in the system?
CORRECT
CHANGESAre we using our full
knowledge to identify the
right changes and
prioritising those likely to
have the biggest impact on
our AIM?
CHANGE
CLEAR
CHANGE
METHODDoes everyone know and
understand the method(S)
we will use to improve?
MEASUREMENT
Can we measure and report
progress on our
improvement aim?
CAPACITY
AND
CAPABILITY Are people and other
resources being deployed
and developed in the best
way to enable
improvement?
SCALE UP
AND SPREADHave we set out our plans
to test implement and scale
up, innovate and share
new learning to spread
improvement everywhere
its needed?
SIX Fundamental questions we must ask of all changes we
are trying to make
11/29/2016
13
The Science of Influence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFdCzN7RYbw
Where are you trying to
change practice ?
• When you see results somewhere else and
try it in your area is it working?
• Again share at your table
– when you have been successful in
improvement what did you do?
11/29/2016
14
Influence
To achieving balance and demonstrating understanding of the needs that underpin the position of the other
So you feel…
Tell me more…
I understand how you feel…
What can we/you do…?
27
The Five Conflict-Handling Modes
Asse
rtiv
en
ess
Cooperativeness
Ass
ert
ive
Unass
ert
ive
Uncooperative Cooperative
Competing Collaborating
Avoiding Accommodating
Compromising
11/29/2016
15
The Urban Monk
https://theurbanmonk.com/resources/ch5/
11/29/2016
16
Conflict
• Competing – assertive and uncooperative, a power
oriented mode. Self-interest.
• Collaborating – both assertive and cooperative. Work
with others.
• Compromising – intermediate in both assertiveness and
cooperativeness. Finding mutually agreeable solutions.
• Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative. Steer clear of
the issue!
• Accommodating – unassertive and cooperative. Neglects
own interests to satisfy the other.
Habits of Improvers
http://www.health.org.uk/pu
blication/habits-improver
The Health Foundation 2015
11/29/2016
17
Making change happen
What tools do you use
share with your neighbour
11/29/2016
18
Making change happen…or not
• Singular piecemeal efforts will not work
• Education alone will not change behaviour
• Measurement is not change
• Exhortation and incentivisation alone work only if you believe that poor motivation is the root cause of the problem
If you want different results,
change the system !
11/29/2016
19
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, Free Press.
Roger’s Adopter Categories
Change the world
Create the conditions
Make the improvement
Macro system
Set Vision, aim and context.
Meso system
Capability, Challenge.
Measurement
Culture
Micro system
Implementation,
measurement and
improvement
Three step Improvement Challenge
Adapted from IHI
11/29/2016
20
Kotter’s Change theory
Kotter 1990
Methods tools and techniques
11/29/2016
21
Break 2.30pm -3.00pm
3 Methods, tools and techniques
• Improvement science
• Model for improvement,
• Lean process mapping
• Triple aim
• Community asset
management
11/29/2016
22
Reference Donabedian
Structure Process Outcome
Quality Improvement in healthcare
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jq52ZjMzqyI
11/29/2016
23
Deming
• Beliefs
• Assumptions
• Motivation
• Interaction
• Learning from theory
and experience
• Prediction
• MFI
• PDSA
• To be expected
• Common and special cause
• Tampering
• Capability
• Interaction
• Optimisation
• Sub systems
• Micro system theory
Systems Variation
Psychology Theory of
knowledge
Profound or Improvement Knowledge
Knowledge for Improvement
Profound Knowledge
Subject Matter Knowledge
Improvement
Learn to combine subject matter
knowledge and profound
knowledge in creative ways to
develop effective changes for
improvement.
11/29/2016
24
By what method
Langley GL, Moen R, Nolan KM, Nolan
TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The
Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach
to Enhancing Organizational
Performance (2nd edition). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2009.
Plan• Objective
• Questions &
predictions
• Plan to carry out:
Who?When?
How? Where?
Do• Carry out plan
• Document
problems
• Begin data
analysis
Act• Ready to
implement?
• Try something
else?
• Next cycle
Study• Complete data
analysis
• Compare to
predictions
• Summarize
What will happen if we
try something different?
Did it work?
What’s next?
The PDSA
Cycle
Do It !!!
11/29/2016
25
The test was planned (including a plan for
collecting data).
The plan was attempted (do the plan). (Make a
prediction)
Time was set aside to analyze the data and study
the results.
Action was rationally based on what was learned.
Source: Improvement Guide pp..60-61
TO BE CONSIDERED A PDSA CYCLE…
11/29/2016
26
IHI Triple Aim
Better
experience
Better
health
Great Staff
experience
Lower cost
The Quadruple Aim
Reference IHI
11/29/2016
27
Focus on your assets
Needs Assets
• Focus on deficiencies • Focus on strengths
• Result in fragmentation of
responses to local deficiencies
• Build relationships among people,
groups, and organizations
• Make people consumers of
services; builds dependence on
services
• Identify ways that people and
organizations give of their talents and
resources
• Give residents little voice in
deciding how to address local
concerns
• Empower people to be an integral part
of the solution to community problems
and issues
Focus on what you have
Create the beginnings of an asset
map
At your table record 3 things that are
contributing to improvement share
with your neighbor
11/29/2016
28
Values to Action
Inertia
Apathy
Fear
Self-doubt
Isolation
Urgency
Anger
Hope
You can make
a difference
Inclusion
Action inhibitors Action motivators
Ov
erc
om
e
Us a
s cha
ng
e le
ad
ers
Improving Access Improving Care Improving Outcomes
Measuring Results
• Measurement MATTERS
• Generate light not heat!
• Measures for improvement
• Dash board of measures
• Run and control charts
• Info graphics
11/29/2016
29
Measuring Results
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
LO
S (
min
ute
s)
Goal
Work-up done on floor
Bed ahead
Individual responsiblefor bed control
Quick-look x-rays
2/16/98 3/16 4/13 5/11 6/8
Week
Minimum Standard for Reporting Data in a
QI Project: Annotated Time Series
11/29/2016
30
15 Diabetes
Clinic teams
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team A
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team B
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team C
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team D
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team E
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team F
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team
G
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team H
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team I
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team J
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team L
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team
M
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team N
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team O
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
Team K
0
20
40
60
80
100
J-07 M-07 S-07 J-08 M-08
Scales for
Small Multiple
Graphs
2730
34
45 45 46 47 4743
47 48 48 4843 42 44
4 4 510 12 11 12 13 13 12 12 12 13 13 13 14
8
0
20
40
60
80
100
J-07 F-07 M-07 A-07 M-07 J-07 J-07 A-07 S-07 O-07 N-07 D-07 J-08 F-08 M-08 A-08 M-08 J-08 J-08
% of Patients with HbA1c <7- Aggregate of Diabetes Teams
Collaborative Data Analysis –
Small Multiples to Support Aggregate Displays
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Programme� 10% increase in ROSC across Scotland� Co-Responding test with Scottish Fire & Rescue Service evaluation by Xmas ’16� Secured Health Foundation investment for remote and rural trial� Wildcat programme commenced� 138 CFRS (1500+ volunteers)� Co-hosted first European Resuscitation Academy to be held in the UK (June ‘16)� Pilot Co-responding with Police Scotland in Grampian for cardiac arrests
Clinical Services Transformation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Return of Spontaneous Circulation for VF/VT patients
VF/VT ROSC Control Line (Pbar) UCL LCL Upper 3rd Lower 3rd Aim
11/29/2016
31
61
Hear and TreatRecruitment of additional clinical advisors and supervisors to establish clinical services hub
GP support to enhance triage and response for GP urgent requests
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
Ap
r-16
Ma
y-1
6
Jun
-16
Jul-1
6
Au
g-1
6
Se
p-1
6
Oct-1
6
No
v-1
6
De
c-16
Jan
-17
Fe
b-1
7
Ma
r-17
Hear & Treat Trajectory
Forecast Monthly % Hear & Treat Trajectory Hear & Treat Target
Clinical Services Transformation
Patient Pathways � Active and Independent Living Improvement Programme (AILIP) established, SAS key member
� Collaborative event on 25th November - 24 IJBs have joined collaborative to date
� All divisions have Senior Divisional lead and a core group of local leads to work with partners on
developing, establishing and improving local pathways (priorities: falls, respiratory, mental health).
� Falls & Frailty page on the new ePR due for release next year
� Enabling more robust data collection for falls and frailty patients
� Potential to move to electronic referrals from the Service to Falls Teams
Clinical Services Transformation
60.0%
62.0%
64.0%
66.0%
68.0%
70.0%
72.0%
74.0%
76.0%
78.0%
80.0%
Apr-14 Jun-14 Aug-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 Feb-15 Apr-15 Jun-15 Aug-15 Oct-15 Dec-15 Feb-16 Apr-16 Jun-16 Aug-16 Oct-16 Dec-16 Feb-17
Emergency Conveyence Rates
Emergency Conveyance %
Frail Elderly Conveyance %
Median: 73.5%
Median: 64.8%
11/29/2016
32
Measurement for Improvement
3 types of measures– outcome, process and balancing
Pragmatic Actions:• Tests Observable• Bias Stabilised• Just Enough Data• Adapts with Change• Rapid Cycle Change Sequential Tests• Run or Control Charts
The Three Faces of Performance Measurement
Aspect Improvement Accountability Research
Aim Improvement of care Comparison, choice, reassurance, spur for
change
New knowledge
Methods:
• Test Observability
Test is observable No test, evaluate current performance
Test blinded or controlled
• Bias Accept consistent bias Measure and adjust to reduce bias
Design to eliminate bias
• Sample Size “Just enough” data, small sequential samples
Obtain 100% of available, relevant data
“Just in case” data
• Flexibility of
Hypothesis
Hypothesis flexible, changes as learning takes
place
No hypothesis Fixed hypothesis
• Testing Strategy Sequential tests No tests One large test
• Determining if aChange is anImprovement
Run charts or Shewhart control charts
No change focus Hypothesis, statistical tests (t-test, F-test, chi
square), p-values
• Confidentiality ofthe Data
Data used only by those involved with improvement
Data available for public consumption and review
Research subjects’identities protected
“
““
“
The Three Faces of Performance Measurement: Improvement, Accountability and Research”””
”
Lief Solberg, Gordon Mosser and Sharon McDonald Journal on Quality Improvement vol. 23, no. 3, (March 1997), 135-147.
11/29/2016
33
http://www.qihub.scot.nhs.uk/improvement-journey/introduce/how-do-we-refine-the-
measurement-plan.aspx
BELIEF
Low degree
of belief
that change
idea will lead
to
improvement
High degree
of belief
that change
idea will lead
to
improvement
Current commitment within organisation
No
commitment
Some
commitment
Strong
commitment
COST OF
FAILURE
Cost of
failure large
Cost of
failure small
Cost of
failure large
Cost of
failure small
Very small scale
test
Very small scale
test
Small scale test
Very small scale
test
Very small scale
test
Very small scale
test
Small scale test
Large scale testSmall scale test
Very small
scale test
ImplementLarge scale test
Testing and Implementing a Change Idea
11/29/2016
34
Example of 3 Step Design in
Implementing the Ventilator Bundle
Integrate daily
goals with MDR
to identify
defects
Education
Baseline
Feedback on
compliance
check built into 1
hour scheduled vent
checks
Example of using 80% and 95% change concepts to initially reach a reliability of 80% then additionally using
a robust change concept (redundancy) to reach 95% reliability in the 4 elements of the ventilator bundle
(Baptist Memorial, Memphis)
Teaching and
awareness
5 Holding the Gains
• Deep and broad
understanding of what
it takes to sustain
change... reliability and
resilience in care
delivery ..
• Sensitive to operations
(Safety II )
• Acknowledge and
monitor spread
• Celebrate Success
11/29/2016
35
Starting Labels of Reliability
• Chaotic process: Failure in greater than 20% of opportunities
• 80 or 90 % : 1 or 2 failures out of 10 opportunities(lacks consistent clear understanding of the process, 5 front line process users
can not easily articulate the process)
• 95% or better : 5 failures or less out of 100 opportunities(has some variation but 5 front line users can easily articulate the process)
(These are IHI definitions and are not meant to be the true mathematical equivalent)
Car service
Brakes Tyres Oil Filters
Car 1 Yes No Yes Yes
Car 2 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Car 3 Yes Yes No Yes
Car 4 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Car 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes
11/29/2016
36
Car service
• Brakes 100%
• Tyres 80%
• Oil 80%
• Filters 100%
• Overall 60%
4 times out of 10 you don’’’’t get a proper service
Aim for high reliability
• Regarding small
errors as a
symptom that
something is
wrong
Preoccupation
with failure
Preoccupation
with failure
• Paying attention
to what’s
happening on
the front-line
Sensitivity to
operations
Sensitivity to
operations• Encouraging
diversity in
experience,
perspective,
and opinion
Reluctance to
simplify
Reluctance to
simplify
• Capabilities to
detect, contain,
and bounce-back
from events
Commitment
to resilience
Commitment
to resilience• Pushing
decision
making down
to the front
line
Deference to
expertise
Deference to
expertise
Anticipate
Contain
11/29/2016
37
Move from safety 1 to safety 2
Things that
Are difficult
but go
right
Things that
go wrong
Early
completion
Excellent
innovation
Positive
surprises
Unwanted Outcome Planned Great outcome
Hollnagel E., Wears R.L. and Braithwaite J. From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper. The Resilient Health Care Net
11/29/2016
38
• If not
You…………………………………..
Who
Making it stick
• What have you changed in practice that has
been sustained?
• How do you think that happened?
• What are the key characteristics?
• Discuss with your neighbor
11/29/2016
39
Holding the gains
• Making it stick
• What have you changed in practice
that has been sustained?
• How do you think that happened?
• What are the key characteristics?
• Discuss with your neighbor
Profound Knowledge
Subject Matter Knowledge
What Prevents Action
�Let’s Change the Conversation
�Everyone knows what they don't want
�Let’s start to focus and describe what we want
�What would be happening if things were going
great and what behaviours get results?
�Need to be specific when solving people problems
�Create opportunities for teams to describe and develop their own solutions
Improving Access Improving Care Improving Outcomes
11/29/2016
40
Be curious always
• IQ – Intelligence Quotient
–processing complex data sets and having
the mental capacity to problem solve at speed
• EQ – Emotional Quotient
–the ability to perceive, control and explain emotions; risk-
taking, creating resilience and empathy
• CQ – Curiosity Quotient
–inquisitive, open to new experiences, finding novelty exciting
Chamorro-Premuzic T. “Curiosity Is as Important as Intelligence.”
Harvard Business Review. Aug 27, 2014.
Share and Exchange
People at the center
Our contacts
[email protected] @sparklescot
[email protected] @peterlachman