l24biol261 popgen evolution2014
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
1/28
! #$ %&'()*+&, -.,.+/0 *,1
23&)(+&,
R. Lewontin The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change.Columbia University Press 1970.
Darwin called attention to the actual variation among actualorganismsas the most essential and illuminating fact of nature.the Darwinian view that evolution begins with the conversionof variation between individuals into variation between
populations, the divergence of populations partly or whollyisolated from one another.
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
2/28
4*56*+&, *,1 23&)(+&,
7, 89. *:0.,/. &;
!"#$%"& ()&)*+,!< !,! %"!-,. /%))-0!1
*,1 (."&& 2,2$&"+,! (03)( 45,$!-)% )6)*#(
"!- -%078($/(#"!+"& .01%"+,! *,1
.$#"+,!< 89. 5*,1&=6>*+&, &; 0.? @6))
A..' 0.?(*) '&'()*+&,0 6, B.,.+/
.C(6)6:56(= 6,1.D,68.)E
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
3/28
F< /&,8.='&5*5E .?*='). &; 9&@ @6896,G'&'()*+&, 3*56*+&, H/,-9
(03): /);"
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
4/28
N9. -*)*'*B&0< 9&=. &; 89. -*)*'*B&0 D,/9.0
J. OPKP -5*,8 *,1 %PKP-5*,8P QRSSP T*8(5*)
J.)./+&, 6, * '&'()*+&,
&; U*5@6,0 V6,/9.0P F=
T*8P Q$$< $WWG$R$P
X
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
5/28
During a drought in 1976-78 on the island of Daphne Major in the Galapagos
Archipelago, the population size of finches (Geospiza fortis) decreased (Graph A) due
to the decline in seed supply(Graph B), during which time the size and hardnessof
the seeds increased (Graph C), as a result of which the average size of finches
increased (Graph D), because larger birds can handle such seeds more efficiently.
%5&/.00.0 89&(B98 8&
9*3. 1563.,
0'./6*+&, &;
-*)*'*B&0 D,/9.0
*5. 0+)) 9*''.,6,BP
7, 8960 /*0.*1*'+3. H'&06+3.I
0.)./+&, ;&5 )*5B.5
:&1E 06>.
Y
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
6/28
F1*'8*+&, 8& * B)(/&0. )6=68.1 =6,6=*) =.16*< .3&)(+&, 60 6,16/*8.1 :E
6,/5.*0. 6, '&'()*+&, D8,.00< =.*0(5.1 5.)*+3. 8& *, *,/.08&5P
20+=*8.1 Z :.,.D/6*) =(8*+&,0 6, #[[[ B.,.5*+&,0 \Q[ G #[ D?.1 6,
.*/9 '&'()*+&, H&; \Q[[ D?.1 G ."A,%0#9 "%) !)$#%"&IP
Y
%&06+3. 0.)./+&, ;&5
=(8*,80 @689 * '&06+3.
6,/5.*0. 6, D8,.00 H]IP
^(8*+&,0 /*(06,B ,&
6,/5.*0. 6, D8,.00 *5.
,.(85*)P
^(8*+&,0 9*36,B *1.).8.56&(0 ._./8 &,
D8,.00 *5. .)6=6,*8.1
H ,.B*+3. 0.)./+&, GI
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
7/28
Random mating means that mating generally occurswithout a correlation with a genotype in particular, orphenotypic variation in general.
Non Random mating:(1)If mating between relatives happensmore frequentlythan
expected by chance, then the offspring are inbred.
(2)Alternatively if less frequently than by chance, there isoutbreeding.
(3) If individuals mate with phenotypically similar individuals,there is positive assortative mating- inbreeding
(4)Alternately if individuals mate with phenotypically unlikepartners, there is negative assortative mating (or disassortative
mating ).
W
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
8/28
Self pollinating plants present the extreme case of
inbreeding. The loss of heterozygosity is easy to track.
Homozygotes
always
produce
homozygous
offspring.
Half of the
offspring of
heterozygotes are
homozygous, the
heterozygousindividuals
frequency
decreases by 1/2
each inbred
generation.
'#L[P#Y< #'CL[PY< C#L [P#Y
C#L [P$WY
C#L [PX$WY
N9. *)).). ;5.C(.,/6.0 *5. 89. 0*=.< ' L [PY< :(8
*`.5 89. D508 B.,.5*+&, 89. '&'()*+&, 60 ,&8 6,
ab2P
S
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
9/28
In a large population there is a small chance that changes in allelefrequencies will be affected by stochastic demographic effects,some individuals die and others fail to breed for unknown reasonsor chance effects.
In a small population, chance inbreeding among a small numberof closely related individuals in a subpopulation, may causerandom changes in allele frequency. The smaller the population,the more likely individuals are related by descent due to
inbreeding.
Chance effects in a small populationcombined with inevitableinbreeding causes allele frequencies to drift towards 1.0 (fixation)or 0.0 (elimination).
R!*5B. %&'()*+&,0 J(:16361.1
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
10/28
Genetic Drift The figure above indicates the divergence inhypothetical populations that started with( 50%) A alleles and(50%) a. Eventually one or the other allele goes to fixation in each
sub- population by chance.
Evolution in small populations: genetic drift - randomdemographic effects and unavoidable inbreeding in smallpopulations
XQ
Q[
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
11/28
Random genetic drift . The graph on the left is a simulation of drift with 16 individuals, in 107
populations that are initially heterozygous. The messier graph on the right is a real - life experiment
with 16 individuals that were heterozygous for the bw/bw75allele that shows the same pattern
expected for a small population that is drifting in allele frequency.
[Data in part (A) from P. Buri. 1956. Evolution 10: 367. Graphs from D. L. Hartl and A. G. Clark.
1989. Principles of Population Genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates]
QQ
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
12/28
genetic drifteliminates mostbut not all mutations,regardlessof their selection coefficients. The time to fixation depends onchance, population size and selection. A longer time means a
greater chance of being lost
BN9. *=&(,8 &;+.);&5 *
!)C "-
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
13/28
SyntheticNeo-Darwinismadmitsthatfounder effects, drift,migration,although mostimportantlypositiveselectioninfluence changes in allelefrequencies between
populations, which if largeenough can lead to speciation,diversification of 1 ancestralspecies.
!"#$%&'"( *+"%$'"(, -.+/01.23&'"( .(4" 5$61#/3./1 &(7 5#/3.&'"(
Q$
%&06+3. 0.)./+&,< ;&(,1.5 ._./80 *,1
156` =*A. 0(:'&'()*+&,0 [email protected].*0 .01%"+,! ."=)( #;). .,%)
(0.0&"%
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
14/28
%9E)&B.,.+/ 85..0d
HQI
5./&,085(/8 B.,.*)&B6/*) 85..0G*,/.08&5
1.0/.,1.,8 5.)*+&,0H#I
20+=*8. 89. +=. &; 163.5B.,/. :.8@..,
8*?*< 06,/. 89.E )*08 09*5.1 * /&==&,
*,/.08&5
QX
!"#$"%"&'&( ("&"'* *+,&(" ,- -+" %#"*."% /"0"/ 1
#+2/3("&"'* -$""%
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
15/28
%5&/.00 (,1.5)E6,B " 1)!) #%))
444 -56 476
.?8.5,*) ,&1.0
6,8.5,*) ,&1.0
QY
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
16/28
Analogy would lead me one step further, namely, to thebelief that all animals and plants havedescended from oneprototype( Darwin 1859)
.
eK./.,8 B.,. 85..0 8.0+,B 5KTF /&16,B *,1 &89.5 UTF 0.C(.,/.
/&*).0/.,/. 6,16/*8.0 *)) &5B*,60=0 *5. 8"("#9:%/'3P N9*8 60
N9(0 89. .?'./8.1 ,(=:.5 &; &"E
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
21/28
J&=. =&)./().0
.3&)3. ;*08.5 89*,
&89.50< 8960
16_.5.,/. 6, 5*8. 60
89&(B98 8& 6,16/*8.
16_.5.,/.0 6,
>$(3'"(&%
3"(140&.(414.,%) ,%
&)(( #,&)%"!# ,5
($/(+#$+,! ,% $!-)%
(#%,!1)% 14&6.%.E.(;
1/%/3'"(8&, 89.
@9&). B.,.< 5*89.589*, 6, * 06,B).
/&1&, &5 .?&,P T&8.d
8960 60 ,.B*+3. &5
.)6=6,*+&, 0.)./+&,
G;) -06)%)!*) 0! )
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
22/28
Related sequences
(RNA pol II in L.Bromham
Reading the DNAstory
) show a
nested hierarchy
of substitutionsunder strong
stabilizing
selectionrelated todivergence times:
Human- rat- 4bp
0AA chg
Human- fly-9bp0AA chg
HumanFungus-11bp 1AA
chg
Human -plant-20bp6AA chg
Human-E coli-23bp8AA chg
##h&='*5*+3. B.,.+/0d 0.C(.,/.
3*56*+&, ;&5 :.8* /)*=' '5&8.6,
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
23/28
T(/).&+1.0 6, @96/9 '&06+&, HI%(#: ()*,!- : #;0%- /"() 0! " *,-,!I *5. .3&)36,B 89.
;*08.08 i b9E i5$!*+,!"& *,!(#%"0!#(P
O.8@.., 6,85&,0 *,1 .?&,0< @96/9 =6B98 :. 89. ;*08.08 .3&)36,B i
F,&)*$&"% *;"!1)( #;"# "%) &)(( &0=)&9 #, /) ($/A)*# #, !)1"+
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
24/28
-.,.+/ 4*56*+&,
*=&,B -.&B5*'96/
5*/.0A major fraction of humangenetic variation is found insmall populations, or there islittle genetic evidence for races.
Both protein polymorphismsand DNA markers concur that85-95% of variation was within
groups, 7-10% of variation wasbetween continental groups
N960 0(BB.080 89*8 &(5 0'./6.0 (,1.5@.,8 * $"*"&-
"9#,&%.3& G$3< , %
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
25/28
%*).&,8&)&B608 B.,.5*))E *B5.. 89*8 a&=&,610 .3&)3.1 6, F;56/* (,+) QG# =6))6&, E.*50 *B&P
N9.5. *5. 8@& =*6, 89.&56.0 *:&(8 0(:0.C(.,8 .3&)(+&, &; a&=& 0*'6.,0d
Multiregional model:The traditional paleontological model has Homo erectus
migrating out of Africa 1-2 million years ago, colonizing Europe and Asia andmore or less simultaneously evolving into Homo sapiens, because of relativelyhigh migration and intermixing.
Out of Africa model:after H. erectushad colonized Europe and Asia, modernH. sapiensevolved in Africa, and began migrating to Europe and Asia,
50-100,000 years ago.
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
26/28
#f
^68&/9&,156*) UTF 60 * 06,B). /65/()*5 /95&=&0&=.< 89*8 H*)=&08I ,.3.5
5./&=:6,.0
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
27/28
Within-species, mitochondrial and non-
recombining Y chromosome regions as
well as low recombination autosomalhaplotypes can be used to make a gene-
tree. =8 UTF .3&)3.0 0.C(.,/. /9*,B.0 *8
* /&,08*,8 5*8.< *:&(8 Q /9*,B. '.5
=68&/9&,156*) )6,.*B. '.5 X
-
8/9/2019 L24Biol261 PopGen Evolution2014
28/28
Q[[