kraft pulping modeling & control 1 control of batch kraft digesters

20
1 Kraft Pulping Modeling & Control Control of Batch Kraft Digesters

Post on 22-Dec-2015

234 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Control of Batch Kraft Digesters

2

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

H-factor ControlVroom

• Manipulate time and/or temperature to reach desired kappa endpoint.

• Works well if there are no variations in raw materials or chemicals.

• Manipulate time and/or temperature to reach desired kappa endpoint.

• Works well if there are no variations in raw materials or chemicals.

Kappa orYield

H-factor

15% EA18% EA

20% EA

3

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

H Factor

Lig

nin

(%

of

Pu

lp)

150°C

160°C

170°C

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

H Factor

Lig

nin

(%

of

Pu

lp)

150°C

160°C

170°C

H-factor ControlVroom

4

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Kappa Batch ControlNoreus et al.

• Control strategy uses empirical model that predicts kappa number from effective alkali concentration of liquor sample at beginning of bulk delignification (~150 ºC).

• Where H is H-factor, EA is effective alkali, K is kappa number, and a are model constants.

• Control strategy uses empirical model that predicts kappa number from effective alkali concentration of liquor sample at beginning of bulk delignification (~150 ºC).

• Where H is H-factor, EA is effective alkali, K is kappa number, and a are model constants.

jn

i

m

j

iij KEAa

H

0 0

1

2000

1500

1000

500

12 14 16 18 20 22 24

K=32

Necessary H-factor for obtaining K = 32 vs. EA concentration in liquor sample

EA

H

5

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

• Effective Alkali Analyzer - Conductivity Titration

• Temperature and pressure sensors

• Effective Alkali Analyzer - Conductivity Titration

• Temperature and pressure sensors

Kappa BatchSensors

6

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Kappa BatchLaboratory Tests

• Effective alkali – compared against titration• End of cook kappa to check prediction

• Effective alkali – compared against titration• End of cook kappa to check prediction

7

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Kappa BatchDisturbances/Upsets

• Chip Supply» Moisture content, size distribution, chemical content

• Pulping Liquor» White liquor EA and sulfidity

» Black liquor EA and sulfidity

• Digester Temperature Profile» Time to temperature and maximum temperature

• Chip Supply» Moisture content, size distribution, chemical content

• Pulping Liquor» White liquor EA and sulfidity

» Black liquor EA and sulfidity

• Digester Temperature Profile» Time to temperature and maximum temperature

8

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Kappa BatchOperations and Objectives

• Operator Setpoint(s)» End of cook kappa number

• Manipulated Variables» Temperature profile

» Cooking time

• Control Objective» Decrease standard deviation in final kappa target.

• Operator Setpoint(s)» End of cook kappa number

• Manipulated Variables» Temperature profile

» Cooking time

• Control Objective» Decrease standard deviation in final kappa target.

9

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Kappa BatchMill Results

• Lowered final kappa standard deviation.• Lowered final kappa standard deviation.

10

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Kappa BatchControl Benefits

• Bleached Pulp» Lower chemical usage and effluent loading in bleach plant

• Unbleached Pulp» Higher yield

• Bleached Pulp» Lower chemical usage and effluent loading in bleach plant

• Unbleached Pulp» Higher yield

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Kappa

Fre

qu

en

cy

Limit Limit

m = 22s = 2.0

m = 25s = 3.5

m = 60s = 2.0

m = 57s = 3.5

Bleached Pulp Unbleached Pulp

11

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Batch ControlKerr

• Control strategy uses semi-empirical model that predicts kappa number from effective alkali concentration of liquor sample taken at two points in the bulk delignification phase.

• Where H is H-factor, a2 and b2 are slope and intercept of lignin to EA relationship, a3 and a4 are constants (a3 can incorporate sulfidity and chip properties).

• Control strategy uses semi-empirical model that predicts kappa number from effective alkali concentration of liquor sample taken at two points in the bulk delignification phase.

• Where H is H-factor, a2 and b2 are slope and intercept of lignin to EA relationship, a3 and a4 are constants (a3 can incorporate sulfidity and chip properties).

43222 /

ln1

aHaabL

L

b

i

f

L

L

12

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Batch ControlKerr

13

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Inferential ControlSutinen et al.

• Control techniques use liquor measurements (CLA 2000) for control of final kappa number» EA – conductivity

» Lignin – UV adsorption

» Total dissolved solids – Refractive Index (RI)

• Control techniques use liquor measurements (CLA 2000) for control of final kappa number» EA – conductivity

» Lignin – UV adsorption

» Total dissolved solids – Refractive Index (RI)

14

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Inferential ControlSutinen et al.

• Statistical model using Partial Least Squares (PLS) to predict kappa number.» Past batch information used to formulate current control

model.

• Control Strategies» Use PLS model to manipulate cooking time or

temperature to achieve final kappa

• Statistical model using Partial Least Squares (PLS) to predict kappa number.» Past batch information used to formulate current control

model.

• Control Strategies» Use PLS model to manipulate cooking time or

temperature to achieve final kappa

15

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Inferential ControlModel Results

• Using model final kappa variation reported to be reduced by 50%.

• Using model final kappa variation reported to be reduced by 50%.

16

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Inferential ControlKrishnagopalan et al.

• Statistical model using Partial Least Squares (PLS) to predict kappa number.» Past batch information used to formulate current control model.

• Control Strategies» Direct – Use PLS model to manipulate input vector

» Indirect (adaptive) – Use PLS model to estimate parameters of empirical model for control (e.g., Chari, Vroom)

• Kinetic models developed for lignin, carbohydrates, and viscosity can be used for optimization (e.g., liquor profiling).

• Statistical model using Partial Least Squares (PLS) to predict kappa number.» Past batch information used to formulate current control model.

• Control Strategies» Direct – Use PLS model to manipulate input vector

» Indirect (adaptive) – Use PLS model to estimate parameters of empirical model for control (e.g., Chari, Vroom)

• Kinetic models developed for lignin, carbohydrates, and viscosity can be used for optimization (e.g., liquor profiling).

17

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

• Continuous in-situ measurements of liquor EA (conductivity), lignin content (UV), solids content (RI), and sulfide concentration (IC).

• Measurements are also done using near infrared.

• Continuous in-situ measurements of liquor EA (conductivity), lignin content (UV), solids content (RI), and sulfide concentration (IC).

• Measurements are also done using near infrared.

Inferential Batch ControlSensors

18

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Inferential Batch ControlOperations and Objectives

• Operator Setpoint(s)» End of cook kappa number

• Manipulated Variables» Midpoint temperature

» Cooking time

• Control Objective» Decrease standard deviation in final kappa target

• Operator Setpoint(s)» End of cook kappa number

• Manipulated Variables» Midpoint temperature

» Cooking time

• Control Objective» Decrease standard deviation in final kappa target

19

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Inferential Batch ControlOperations and Objectives

• Model based control adjusts both end time and temperature in optimal fashion.

• Temperature main manipulated variable

• Model based control adjusts both end time and temperature in optimal fashion.

• Temperature main manipulated variable

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Tim e (m in)

Tem

p (

°C)

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Tim e (m in)

Tem

p (

°C)

20

Kraft PulpingModeling& Control

Inferential Batch ControlSimulated Results

• Adaptive strategy performs better. Handles non-linearity between manipulated variables and end kappa more efficiently.

• Adaptive strategy performs better. Handles non-linearity between manipulated variables and end kappa more efficiently.