kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning by lindsey busker and sydney thomson
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF
MORAL REASONING
By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson
![Page 2: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Lawrence Kohlberg
Born in Bronxville, New York on October 25, 1927
Attended high school at Phillips Academy and then served in the Merchant Marine at the end of World War II
Earned his bachelor’s degree in 1948 Completed his doctoral degree in psychology
in 1958 Died on January 19, 1987 in Massachusetts
![Page 3: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Six Stages of Moral Reasoning Level I: Pre-conventional
Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation
Stage 2: Instructional Relativist Orientation Level II: Conventional
Stage 3: “Good Boy/ Nice Girl” Orientation Stage 4: Law and Order Orientation
Level III: Post-conventional Stage 5: Social Contract Stage 6: Universal, Ethical Principles
![Page 4: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Problematizing Literature
Ford and Lowery (1986) - young adults only
Myyry, Juåujärvi, and Pesso (2013) - higher education only
White, Bushnell, and Regnemer (1978) - not contemporary
![Page 5: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Our Two Hypotheses
Based on Kohlberg’s stage theory of moral reasoning, we predict that a higher level of education correlates to a higher level of moral reasoning.
We predict that there are gender differences based on Kohlberg’s stage theory of moral reasoning.
We predict that with regularly attending religious service, there would be an increase in level of moral reasoning
![Page 6: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Methodology
Participants convenience sample of 24
6 seniors 6 freshmen 6 eighth graders 6 fourth graders
Setting Holy family classroom Braniff classroom, Anselm
classroom Measures
paper-based Gender, Age, classification, religious service Dilemma VIII
Procedure administer moral dilemma VIII
![Page 7: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Moral Dilemma VIII
In a country in Europe, a poor man named Valjean could find no work, nor could his sister and brother. Without
money, he stole food and medicine that they needed. He was captured and sentenced to prison for 6 years. After a couple of years, he escaped from the prison and went to live in another part of the country under a new name.
He saved money and slowly built up a big factory. He gave his workers the highest wages and used most of his profits to build a hospital for people who couldn't afford good medical care. Twenty years had passed when a tailor recognized the factory owner as being
Valjean, the escaped convict whom the police had been looking for back in his hometown.
![Page 8: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Moral Dilemma VIII Questions1. Should the tailor report Valjean to the
police? Why or why not?
2. Does a citizen have a duty or obligation to report an escaped convict?
Why or why not?
![Page 9: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Questions 3 & 4
3. Suppose Valjean were a close friend of the tailor. Should he then report Valjean?
Why or why not?
4. If Valjean were reported and brought before the judge, should the judge send him back to jail or let him go free?
Why or why not?
![Page 10: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Questions 5 & 6
5. Thinking in terms of society should people who break the law be punished?
Why or why not?
6. Valjean was doing what his conscience told him to do when he stole the food and medicine. Should a lawbreaker be punished if he is acting out of conscience?
Why or why not?
![Page 11: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Glossary of Terms Choice
Autonomous choices support and justify the solution to a dilemma that is just and fair from the standpoint of post-conventional stages of moral judgment (i.e., they are based on principles of justice, fairness, equity.)
Hierarchy Autonomous judgments reflect a clear hierarchy of moral values and prescriptive
duties that supersede pragmatic, descriptive, consequential or aesthetic considerations.
Freedom Autonomous judgments are made without reference to external parameters
(such as authority, tradition, or law) for justification or validation
Reversibility judgments are characterized by the ability to engage in mutual or reciprocal role
taking. Heteronomous judgments are constrained by considering only one perspective on a problem.
Constructivism Autonomous judgments consider rules and laws as humanly constructed
guidelines, and as such are flexible and adaptable to special situation and circumstances. Heteronomous judgments construe laws and rules as emanating from some higher authority and therefore must remain rigid and inflexible
![Page 12: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Grading Rubric
Stages of Moral Reasoning
Defined by Kohlberg How we determined which stage each
student is in
Stage 1 • Concern on a fixed set of unchanging rules
• Worry about what authorities will permit and punish
• Gave a very black and white answer
• Did not explain or justify their answer
Stage 2 • Punishments are now a risk• Fair exchange policy
• Mentioning what benefits others listed in the dilemma
Stage 3 • Character traits described• Motives of each party involved
• Mentions redemption/lesson learned
Stage 4 • Emphasis on obeying laws, respecting authority, and preforming one’s duties so social order is maintained
• Explore the reasons why we say something is wrong
• Solely focused on law and order
Stage 5 • Stress on basic rights and democratic procedures to change unfair laws
• Student is primarily concerned with the individual rights, and how citizens agree as a whole.
• Anything to do with Valjean making a difference, benefiting society, promoting social justice,
Stage 6 • Look at problems through all eyes- clear concept of universal principles
• We did not look at this stage
![Page 13: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment
![Page 14: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Stage 2: Instructional Relativist
![Page 15: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Stage 3: “Good Boy/ Nice Girl”
![Page 16: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Stage 4: Law and Order
![Page 17: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Stage 5: Social Contract
![Page 18: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Results: Seniors
Participant
Gender
Age
Classification
Religious Service
Moral Reasoning
1 Male 22 Senior Yes 4
2 Female
22 Senior No 4
3 Female
21 Senior Yes 4
4 Male 22 Senior Yes 4
5 Female
21 Senior No 3
6 Female
21 Senior Yes 4
![Page 19: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Results: Freshman
Participant
Gender
Age Classification
Religious Service
Moral Reasoning
7 Male 24 Freshman Yes 4
8 Male 18 Freshman Yes 4
9 Female
18 Freshman Yes 4
10 Male 18 Freshman Yes 3
11 Female
18 Freshman Yes 4
12 Female
18 Freshman Yes 3
![Page 20: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results: Eighth Graders
Participant
Gender
Age Classification
Religious Service
Moral Reasoning
19 Female
13 8th Grade Yes 4
20 Female
13 8th Grade Yes 4
21 Male 14 8th Grade No 3
22 Female
14 8th Grade Yes 3
23 Female
13 8th Grade Yes 4
24 Female
13 8th Grade Yes 3
![Page 21: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Results: Fourth Graders
Participant
Gender
Age
Classification
Religious Service
Moral Reasoning
13 Male 10 4th Grade Yes 1
14 Female
9 4th Grade Yes 1
15 Female
9 4th Grade Yes 3
16 Female
9 4th Grade Yes 2
17 Female
10 4th Grade Yes 1
18 Female
9 4th Grade No 2
![Page 22: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Treatment of Data
Averaged each class Seniors
3.83 Freshmen
3.66 Eighth graders
3.50 Fourth Graders
1.66
Averaged college group &
elementary group Freshmen & Seniors
Males - 3.8 Females - 3.71
4th & 8th graders Males – 2.00 Females – 2.70
Hypothesis 1 Hypothesis 2
![Page 23: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Conclusion
Accept our first hypothesis in which we predicted that a higher level of education correlates to a higher level or moral reasoning.
Accept our second hypothesis that there
would be gender differences for the college population, reject for based on Kohlberg’s stage theory of moral reasoning.
![Page 24: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Limitations
Convenience sample Understanding of the questions asked Misinterpretation of religious service Time Control of extraneous variables Participant bias
![Page 25: KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF MORAL REASONING By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081418/56649c905503460f9494a43e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Works Cited
Ford, M. R., & Lowery, C. R. (1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning: A comparison of the use of justice and care orientations. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 50(4), 777-783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.777
Myyry, L., Juujärvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Change in values and moral reasoning during higher education. European Journal Of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 269-284. doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.757217
White, C. B., Bushnell, N., & Regnemer, J. L. (1978). Moral development in Bahamian school children: A 3-year examination of Kohlberg's stages of moral development. Developmental Psychology, 14(1), 58-65. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.14.1.58