km & hpt: uscg 2010 hpt conference
DESCRIPTION
Describes the relationship between Human Performance Technology (HPT) and Knowledge Management (KM) and proposes a framework for successful KM/CoP implementationTRANSCRIPT
The HPT/KM Connection A Necessary Framework for Knowledge Management
Presented at:The United States Coast Guard
Human Performance Technology Conference
September 16, 2010 - Williamsburg, Virginia
Ms. Janet CichelliSerco, Inc.
LinkedIn: janet-cichelli
• Exploit organizational knowledge
• Facilitate learning
• Improve performance
KM & HPT – Shared Goals
KM is the systematic process of acquiring,
creating, capturing, synthesizing, learning, and
using information, insights, and experiences
to enable performance.
(Harvard Business School 1988)
HPT is a systematic approach to
improving individual and
organizational performance. (Pershing, 2006)
Knowledge
Management
Human Performance Technology
Explicit Knowledge
Tacit Knowledge
The Knowledge Domain
Old thinking:
New thinking:
Focus on Context & Connections
Focus on Content & Collection
Connecting the right people just-in-time,
canvassing their knowledge and advice
in the context of a particular operational
problem or need.
The acquisition, organization, storage
and dissemination of content just in
case it might be used in the future.
Requires a Different Approach to KM
From Hierarchies to Communities
Shifting to
Connections & Conversation
“Hey, do you know where to find….?”
“Hey, do you know how to….?”Work is already social:
When we have a need, we typically turn to our informal
network of people we trust.
Communities of Practice: Context & Connection
Benefits:
• It enables people to easily probe and clarify information they find and re-frame it into their context.
• Allows you to share your experiences and learn from others
• Validates and builds on existing knowledge
Community
A community helps people get to
“know each other” over a series of
interactions.
A CoP can help accelerate learning
and performance.
But, If You Build it….
Gartner Says Many Social Software Projects Fail
Many social software projects fail because …
organizations fall into the trap of following "worst
practice," installing social software in the expectation
that productive communities will emerge
spontaneously. Gartner's discussions with clients
suggest that the "install and they will come" practice
rarely succeeds; about 70 percent of the
community typically fails to coalesce.
Many Communities Experience
a Mid-Life Crisis
The most vital of the communities we reviewed
shared six characteristics – clear purpose,
active leadership, critical mass of engaged
members, sense of accomplishment, high
management expectations, and real time.
…they won’t
necessarily come.
Top 10 Contributing Factors
1. No clear operational rationale
2. Starting with the technology
3. Not knowing your audience
4. Wrong community type (engagement model)
5. Components don’t address performance needs
6. Not designed for the job environment
7. Resulting system is too complex/difficult to use
8. No plan for content management
9. Not resourced adequately (community facilitator)
10. Not planning for the cultural changes
Time for a Superhero
HPT
Human performance technology
(HPT) provides the systematic
framework to help guide KM &
Community of Practice initiatives.
Guide what exactly?• Identification of KM/CoP interventions
• Is a CoP the right fit?
• What specific kind of capability?
• How will we know it’s successful?
Mission and Business Goals
Desired Workforce
Performance
Actual Workforce
Performance
Lack of skills
Lack of knowledge
Lack of incentives
and rewards
Lack of motivation
Lack of feedback
Lack of information
Coaching
Documentation
Self-Study Guides
Job Aids
Instructor-Led Training
Electronic Performance Support
Online learning (WBT/CBT)
Knowledge Management System
Gap
Causes
Interventions
Instructional Systems Design
EPSS/PCD Methodology
KM Methodology
Methodology
Traditional Human Performance Technology (HPT) Model
Where performance gaps are due to ineffective access to or exchange of
information between people or machines, KM can make information
available, and improve the exchange of information and ideas.
KM should be used when there is a need for readily accessible
information for the purposes of
• sharing solutions and innovations,
• determining best practices,
• meeting customer’s needs,
• increasing responsiveness and
• increasing collaboration
Source: Van Buren, 2001
Knowledge Management as a Performance Support
Intervention
This Frameworkhelps
drive requirements and
additional considerations
for KM/CoP efforts.
The KM intervention must be aligned with each of these areas to drive success
and optimal performance.
A Broader Human Performance Framework
Organization (Mission Readiness)
Environment
Strategy
Individual
Operations (Mission Accomplishment)
Adapted from ASTD “Leading Knowledge Management and Learning”
Considerations:
• What are the primary external
influences?
• How do they impact performance?
• Doctrine
• An increasingly mobile workforce
• Budget realities
• Increasing complexities (e.g., Cyber Security) & multi-mission arena
• Mandates for agility & change (e.g., Katrina, Deepwater Horizon)
A Coast Guard/DHS
KM system must be
aligned with:
Human Performance Framework - Environment
Environment
Strategy
Individual
Operations (Mission Accomplishment)
Organization (Mission Readiness)
Considerations:
• What is the organizations mission
and vision?
• Are work tasks aligned with them?
• Transform to an agile, responsive organization
• Innovate
• Leverage the skills, knowledge, experience of staff
A KM system must support
USCG strategy to:
Human Performance Framework - Strategy
Environment
Strategy
Individual
Operations (Mission Accomplishment)
Organization (Mission Readiness)
Considerations:
• What are people supposed to do?
• What tools and technologies are
available to help them do it?
• Know what we know so we don’t reinvent the wheel
• Reduce the cycle time to exploit lessons learned
A Coast Guard KM system
must help:
Human Performance Framework - Operations
Environment
Strategy
Operations (Mission Accomplishment)
Individual
Organization (Mission Readiness)
Considerations:
• How are people organized to
support performance?
• How are they measured?
• Cross-functional teams
• Specialized communities of interest
• The new “C” workforce (create content,
conversation, connected)
• Knowledge-sharing as a core competency
A Coast Guard KM
system must support:
Human Performance Framework - Organization
Environment
Strategy
Individual
Operations (Mission Accomplishment)
Organization (Mission Readiness)
Considerations:
• Do people have the ability and
motivation needed to perform?
• Reward and incent knowledge sharing
• Provide a low threshold for new users
• Provide a high ceiling for accomplished performers
A Coast Guard KM
system must help:
Human Performance Framework - Individual
Environment
Strategy
Individual
Operations (Mission Accomplishment)
Organization (Mission Readiness)
CONNECTIONS CONTENT
• The right engagement model & characteristics
• The right functional components
• The right human performance interface design
• The right content management and evaluation
Applying the Model for KM Results
5 Community Engagement Models
Service & Support Community
Developer/Partner Community
Affinity/Loyalty Community
Private Community
Professional-Peer Community
Professional-Peer Community Engagement Model
Professional-Peer Community Engagement Model
Professional-Peer Community Engagement Model
Community Models & Characteristics
Identity – uniquely identifying people in the system
Presence – knowing who is online, available or otherwise nearby
Relationships – describing how two users in the system are related
Conversations – talking to other people through the community
Groups – forming communities of interest
Reputation – knowing the status of other people in the system
Sharing – sharing things that are meaningful (videos, photos)
Awareness – know who has similar interests/tastes/content
Selecting the Right Functional Components
Wiki
BlogProfiles
Event Calendar
Ask an Expert
Document Library
News Feeds
Discussion Forums
…and LOTS more
25
Using a Blog to Transfer Lessons LearnedUsing a Blog to Transfer Insights into Lessons Learned
Content deleted
Real-Time Capture of Value
Not Applicable
Distributed for Information
Previously Adopted
Reading for Interest Only
May Consider Adopting
Plan to Adopt
Real-Time Capture of Value
Detailed Feedback Analysis
Exploding Munitions
Incident
Airborne lead
hazards from
burning of SAA
Ammunition
and explosives
stored too close
to living areas
Inappropriate
HAZMAT storage
during severe
weather
Ammunition
Storage
Management
(AMMO-96)
Course Pilot
live
New
requirements
for Damage in
Transit
inspection
Making
Amnesty Turn In’s
almost painless
Not Applicable
Distributed for Information
Previously Adopted
Reading for Interest Only
May Consider Adopting
Plan to Adopt
Detailed Impact Assessment
28
• An HPT approach to KM ensures:
• The right engagement model & characteristics
• The right functional components
• The right human performance interface design
• The right content management and evaluation
• This, in turn, ensures
• Delivery of actionable information & know-how
• The right knowledge in the right format to the right person at the right
time
• KM can reduce the cycle time to exploit lessons learned and innovation
In Summary
Questions? Conversation.
Janet CichelliPractice Manager, Advanced Learning & KM
Serco North America
240-778-1223