kinase inhibitors in localized and metastatic kidney cancers ...kinase inhibitors in localized and...

20
Kinase inhibitors in localized and metastatic kidney cancers in metastatic kidney cancers in senior adult patients senior adult patients. Jean-Pierre Droz, MD, PhD Professor of Medical Oncology, Claude-Bernard Lyon 1 University Geriatric Oncology Program PROLOG program of the French National Cancer Institute Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France

Upload: others

Post on 17-Feb-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Kinase inhibitors in localized and metastatic kidney cancers inmetastatic kidney cancers in

    senior adult patientssenior adult patients.Jean-Pierre Droz, MD, PhD, ,

    Professor of Medical Oncology, Claude-Bernard Lyon 1 University Geriatric Oncology Program

    PROLOG program of the French National Cancer Institute Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France

  • Three major pathological subgroupsThree major pathological subgroups.

    Clear cell Papillary Chromophobe cell

  • VEGF receptor blockade.

    VEGFBevacizumab

    VEGF

    VEGFR-2

    Vascular endothelial cellplasma membrane

    PI3K RafP PSorafenib

    AxitinibSorafenib

    Akt/PKB MEKP PVascular permeability

    SorafenibSunitinib

    p38MAPKErkEndothelial cell

    survival

    Endothelial cell

    Temsirolimus

    Rini B, et al. J Clin Oncl. 2005;23:1028-1043.

    Endothelial cell migration

    Endothelial cell proliferation

  • 0.80.91.0

    0 50.60.70.8

    0 20.30.40.5

    Sunitinib (n=375)M di t h d

    00.10.2 Median not reached

    IFN-α (N=375)Median not reached

    Hazard Ratio = 0.65(95% CI: 0.449–0.942)P = 0.0219*

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Durée (Mois)

    Overall survival= S(ASCO 2008)

    Progression-freeSurvival= SSurvival= S

  • Hypertension 24%/8%

    Hand /foot syndrom 20%/5% Trials’inclusion criteriaNausea /vomiting 44%/3%Diarrhea 53%/5%

    Rash 19%/1%

    Trials inclusion criteriaand toxicities.

    Anemia 71%/3%

    Leucopenia /neutro 78%/5%

    Thrombocytopenia 65%/8%Median age 62 years (27-87)

    y p

    Asthenia 51%/7%

    Pain 11%/1%

    Anorexia NR

    Age > 70 years ?

    Perform. status ≥ 80 (100= 62%)Anorexia NR

    Hyperglycemia NR

    Lipids /lipase 30-40%/1%

    Edema NR

    Creatinine clear. + ???

    Cardiac comorb. significant < 1y?Edema NR

    Creatinine increase 66%/1%

    Weight loss NR

    Hypertension controlled

    Haematological +Stomatitis 25%/1%

    Liver toxicity # 50%/2%

    Cardiac toxicity 10%/2% (EVF)

    Liver +

    Lipids Proteinuria NR

    Thrombosis NR

    Perforation NR

    Coagulation +

  • NEJM 2007;356:125-134

  • O ll i l NSOverall survival= NS

    Progression-free Survival= S

  • Hypertension 17%/4%

    Hand /foot syndrom 30%/1%

    Trials’inclusion criteriaNausea /vomiting 20%/0%Diarrhea 43%/2%

    Rash 40%/1%

    Trials’inclusion criteriaand toxicities.

    Anemia 34%/3%

    Leucopenia /neutro NR

    Thrombocytopenia NR

    Median age 58 years (19-86)

    Age > 70 years ?y p

    Asthenia 35%/5%

    Pain 10%/0%

    Anorexia NR

    Perform. status ≥ 60 (100= 49%)

    Creatinine clear. ?

    Anorexia NR

    Hyperglycemia NR

    Lipids /lipase 12%/7%

    Edema NR

    Cardiac comorb. ?

    Hypertension ?Edema NRCreatinine increase NR

    Weight loss 10%/0%

    yp

    Haematological +Liver +Stomatitis NR

    Liver toxicity NR

    Cardiac toxicity 1 pt

    Liver +Lipids ?

    Proteinuria NR

    Thrombosis 1 pt

    Perforation NR

    Coagulation +

  • Overall and Progression-free survivalsare significantly improved.

    Temsirolimus > combination > IFN.

    Overall survival= S

  • Hypertension NR

    Hand /foot syndrom NR

    Nausea /vomiting 37%/2% Trials’inclusion criteriagDiarrhea 27% /1%

    Rash 47%/4%

    Anemia 45%/20%

    Trials inclusion criteriaand toxicities.

    Median age 59 years (23-86)

    A > 70 30% (> 65 )

    Anemia 45%/20%

    Leucopenia /neutro 6%/1%

    Thrombocytopenia 14%/1%

    A th i 51%/11 % Age > 70 years 30% (> 65 y)

    Perform. status ≥ 60

    Asthenia 51%/11 %

    Pain 28%/5%

    Anorexia 32%/3%

    Creatinine clear. # ≥ 60 (< 80= 82%)

    Cardiac comorb. ?

    Hyperglycemia 26%/11%

    Lipids /lipase 24%/1%

    Edema 27%/2%

    Hypertension ?

    Haematological +

    Creatinine increase 14%/3%

    Weight loss 19%/1%

    Stomatitis NR

    Liver +

    Lipids +

    Liver toxicity NR

    Cardiac toxicity NR

    Proteinuria NR

    Coagulation Proteinuria NR

    Thrombosis NR

    Perforation NR

  • Overall survival= NSOverall survival= NS

    Progression-freeSurvival= SSurvival S

  • Hypertension 26%/3%

    Hand /foot syndrom NR Trials’inclusion criteriaNausea /vomiting NRDiarrhea 20%/2%

    Rash NR

    and toxicities.

    Anemia NRLeucopenia /neutro 7%/4%

    Thrombocytopenia 6%/2% bleeding 33% Median age 61 years (18-81)y p g

    Asthenia 33%/12%

    Pain NRAnorexia NR

    Age > 70 years +

    Perform. status ≥ 70(70-80= 23%)

    Creatinine clear. +??Anorexia NRHyperglycemia NRLipids /lipase NREdema NR

    Cardiac comorb. ?

    Edema NRCreatinine increase NRWeight loss NR

    Hypertension Not controlled

    Haematological +Stomatitis NR

    Liver toxicity NR

    Cardiac toxicity 1 pt

    Liver +Lipids

    Proteinuria 18%/7%

    Thrombosis 3%/2%

    Perforation 5 (1%)

    Coagulation +

  • Summary: standard management.y g

    MSKCC Treatment optionsgroups

    First- line Second- line

    Standard Option Standard Option

    favorable Sunitinib Beva+IFNIL2 ?IL2 ?

    Sorafenib SunitinibT i

    Intermediate-i k

    Sunitinib Beva+IFN Temsiro-limus ?

    riskPoor- risk Temsiro- Sunitinib

    limus

  • Major treatment limits in elderlyMajor treatment limits in elderly.Sunitinib Sorafenib Temsirolimus Bevacizumab

    Median age 62 years (27-87) 58 years (19-86) 59 years (23-86) 61 years (18-81)Age > 70 years ? ? 30% (> 65 y) +Perform. status ≥ 80 (100= 62%) ≥ 60 (100= 49%) ≥ 60 ≥ 70(70-80= 23%)Creatinine clear. + ??? # ≥ 60 (< 80= 82%) +??

    Cardiac comorb. significant < 1y? ? ?

    Hypertension t ll d ? t ll dHypertension controlled ? controlled

    Haematological + + + +Liver + + + +Lipids +Coagulation + + +

  • Comparative side effects (1)Comparative side effects (1).Sunitinib Sorafenib Temsirolimus Bevacizumab

    Hypertension 24%/8% 17%/4% NR 26%/3%

    Hand /foot syndrom 20%/5% 30%/1% NR NRNausea /vomiting 44%/3% 20%/0% 37%/2% NRDiarrhea 53%/5% 43%/2% 27% /1% 20%/2%Diarrhea 53%/5% 43%/2% 27% /1% 20%/2%

    Rash 19%/1% 40%/1% 47%/4% NRAnemia 71%/3% 34%/3% 45%/20% NRLeucopenia /neutro 78%/5% NR 6%/1% 7%/4%

    Thrombocytopenia 65%/8% NR 14%/1% 6%/2% bleeding33%

    Asthenia 51%/7% 35%/5% 51%/11 % 33%/12%

    Pain 11%/1% 10%/0% 28%/5% NR

    = very frequent = frequent

  • Comparative side effects (2).Sunitinib Sorafenib Temsirolimus Bevacizumab

    p ( )

    Anorexia NR NR 32%/3% NR

    H l i NR NR 26%/11% NRHyperglycemia NR NR 26%/11% NR

    Lipids /lipase 30-40%/1% 12%/7% 24%/1% NR

    Edema NR NR 27%/2% NR

    Creatinine increase 66%/1% NR 14%/3% NR

    Weight loss NR 10%/0% 19%/1% NRStomatitis 25%/1% NR NR NRLiver toxicity # 50%/2% NR NR NRCardiac toxicity 10%/2% (EVF) 1 pt NR 1 ptProteinuria NR NR NR 18%/7%Proteinuria NR NR NR 18%/7%Thrombosis NR 1 pt NR 3%/2%Perforation NR NR NR 5 (1%)

  • Conclusions: difficult to treat elderly!!Conclusions: difficult to treat elderly!!• Few patients included in trials; no specificFew patients included in trials; no specific

    reports in elderly.• Inclusion criteria do not allow to include elderly• Inclusion criteria do not allow to include elderly

    patients: what behind?M i i i hi h i i ld l• Many toxicities which are important in elderly: HTA, CxVx, anorexia, fatigue /asthenia, hand /foot syndrom, anemia, neutropenia, renal toxicity.

    • The need for retrospective /prospective cohort studies.studies.