kiernan et al_2002_journal of proteome research_comparative urine phenotyping.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 17
Comparative Urine Protein Phenotyping Using Mass SpectrometricImmunoassay
Urban A Kiernandagger Kemmons A Tubbsdagger Dobrin Nedelkovdagger Eric E Niederkoflerdagger
Elizabeth McConnellDagger and Randall W Nelsondagger
Intrinsic Bioprobes Inc 625 South Smith Road Suite 22 Tempe Arizona 85281 and Arizona State UniversityTempe Arizona 85287
Received October 1 2002
Reported here human urine samples were analyzed for -2-microglobulin ( 2m) transthyretin (TTR)
cystatin C urine protein 1 (UP1) retinol binding protein (RBP) albumin transferrin and human
neutrophil defensin peptides (HNP) using mass spectrometric immunoassay (MSIA) MSIA is a unique
analytical technique which allows for the generation of distinct protein profiles of specific target proteins
from each subject which may be subsequently used in comparative protein expression profiling
between all subjects Comparative profiling allows for the rapid identification of variations within
individual protein expression profiles Although the majority of analyses performed in this studyrevealedhomology between study participants roughly one-quarter showed variation in the protein profiles
Some of these observed variants included a point mutation in TTR absence of wild-type RBP
monomeric forms UP1 a novel 2m glycated end product and altered HNP ratios MSIA has been
previously used in the analysis of blood proteins but this study shows how M SIA easily transitions to
the analysis of urine samples This study displays how qualitative urine protein differentiation is readily
achievable with MSIA and is useful in identifying proteomic differences between subjects that might
be otherwise overlooked with other analytical techniques due to complexity of the resulting data or
insufficient sensitivity
Keywords proteomics bull protein variations bull MALDI-TOF bull urine bull biomarker discovery
IntroductionUrine is an easily accessible biological fluid that has lately
become more intensely studied in the quest to identify protein
and peptide biomarkers that may potentially be used to assess
kidney function and identify the presence of disease in the
individual Many small proteins and peptides freely pass though
the glomerulus where they are then either catabolized within
the tubular cells of the kidney or are excreted in the urine1
Abnormalities in kidney function and the presence of disease
often result in variations in urine protein excretion rate and
content both of which have been historically monitored via
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)23 This along
with the fact that the acquisition of urine is normally a
noninvasive procedure makes it an ideal biological fluid for
human proteomics studiesThe field of proteomics is developing new technologies and
methodologies toward the analysis of proteins from a variety
of biological fluids including urine A common proteomic
approach to analyzing urine proteins involves 2-dimensional
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) for protein
separation Even though this method is capable of separating
hundreds to thousands of proteins in a single analysis it is not
without weakness 2D-PAGE has in the past had poor results
in the analysis of peptides due to their high mobilities4 The
identification of separated proteins as well as the detection of
low-abundance proteins has also been historically problematic
A more recent innovation which incorporates 2D-PAGE with
mass spectrometry (2DEMS) provides more accurate results
but requires enzymatic digestion of the isolated proteins5
Although able to accurately identify genes from which pro-
teolytic fragments originate6 the 2DEMS approaches are not
readily able to yield information on the full-length protein and
oftentimes subtle details on the analyte (eg the presence of
point mutations and post-translational modifications) are
missed Because this information can be lost analysis of intact
proteins is becoming more widely accepted as a mean of proteomic analysis7
A proteomics technology that has great potential in the area
of intact urine protein analyses is the mass spectrometric
immunoassay (MSIA) MSIA combines the selectivity of an
immunoassay with the sensitivity resolution and mass ac-
curacy of matrix assisted laser desorptionionization time-of-
flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) A major advantage
of mass spectrometric detection over other conventional im-
munoassay schemes is the ability to discriminate between
protein variants in a single assay8 Because retrieved species
To whom correspondence should be addressed Tel (480) 804-1778Fax (480) 804-0778 E-mail rnelsonintrinsicbiocom
dagger Intrinsic Bioprobes IncDagger Arizona State University
101021pr025574c CCC $2500 983209 2003 American Chemical Society J ournal of Proteome Research 2003 2 191-197 191
Published on Web 01162003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 27
are detected at precise molecular masses mass-shifted variants
of a protein (ie post-translational modifications or point
mutations) are readily detected in a single assay This approach
is contrary to conventional immunoassays where each protein
variant would require an individual monospecific assay which
obviously requires an a priori knowledge of the variants under
investigation (ie a monospecific assay must be constructed
for each variant after the variant is either discovered or
hypothesized) Conversely the MSIA approach is able to
discover as yet unidentified variants of proteins through the useof pan antibodies towards the protein of interest Thus MSIA
when applied to the routine screening of known protein
variants (ie wild-type) holds much potential in the discovery
and identification of variants resulting from post-translational
modifications splicing variations or point mutations
Moreover MSIA in the form of an affinity pipettor tip is
capable of analyzing very low abundance proteins via a
repetitive pipetting action The flowing action of the pipettor
tip concentrates and purifies the target protein prior to MALDI-
TOF MS analysis allowing for routine analyses of protein targets
in the picomolar and sub-picomolar range9 Once in the mass
spectrometer different forms of the same protein are readily
distinguishable by measurable alterations in molecular mass
thus allowing for protein isoform identificationThe general utility of MSIA is not that of generating global
gene product expression profiles as done by many other
proteomics technologies but is that of targeting a specific
protein and analyzing all endogenous forms of the intact target
protein from within a specific human biological fluid In this
manner the exact form(s) of a proteinsrather than those
presumed from a genomic database searchscan be determined
within an individual and slight changes in structure discerned
for (ultimately) correlation with disease Previously MSIA has
been demonstrated in the high throughput quantification and
characterization of various human plasma proteins10-12 but still
has been largely unexploited in the field of urine protein
analyses with the only reported application being the quan-
titation of -2-microglobulin ( 2m)13 and the comparativeprofiling of retinol binding protein (RBP)14 Described here is
the development of further urine-based MSIA assays targeting
transthyretin (TTR) cystatin C (CYSC) urine protein 1 (UP1)
albumin (ALB) transferrin (TRFE) and human neutrophil
defensins (HNP) and a brief study illustrating their use in
profiling these proteins between individuals
Experimental Section
Study Subjects Urine samples were collected from 5 unre-
lated male subjects ages ranging from 26 to 79 Four subjects
ages 26-68 were healthy study participants whereas one
individual age 79 was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer Urine
samples were obtained via protocols approved through IntrinsicBioprobes Incrsquos Internal Review Board (IRB) The individuals
had read and signed an Informed Consent form
Sample Preparation Urine samples 25 mL mid-stream
voids from five individuals were collected The urine was
collected directly into sterile urine collection cups that were
pretreated with 50 microL of the protease inhibitor cocktail consist-
ing of AEBSF (100 mM) aprotin (80 microM) bestatin (5 mM) E-64
(15 mM) leupeptin (2 mM) pepstatin A (1 mM) to prevent
any enzymatic breakdown or modification Samples were
collected and stored at -70degC until ready for analysis Samples
were thawed in a warm water bath (37 degC) just prior to analysis
Sample Analysis Each sample was combined 11 (vv) with
2M ammonium acetate (to adjust the pH to sim68-72) and
poured into an individual poly(vinyl chloride) solution basin
prior to analysis Each sample was individually addressed with
individual MSIA-Tips (Intrinsic Bioprobes Inc) derivatized with
anti- 2m anti-TTR anti-CYSC anti-UP1 anti-RBP anti-ALB
anti-TRFE or carboxylic acid surface (cation exchange for HNP
analysis) All eight analyses were run in parallel through each
sample with MSIA-Tips loaded onto an octapette
The manual incubation of each urine sample consisted of
300 cycles (150 microL of sample) through each MSIA-Tip After
incubation tips were thoroughly rinsed using HBS buffer (10
cycles 150 microL) doubly distilled water (5 cycles 150 microL) 20
acetoniltrile1M ammonium acetate wash (10 cycles 150 microL)
and finally with doubly distilled water (15 cycles 150 microL)
Retained species were eluted by drawing 4 microL of MALDI matrix
solution (saturated aqueous solution of sinapic acid (SA) in
33 (vv) acetonitrile 04 (vv) trifluoroacetic acid) into eachtip and depositing directly onto a 96-well formatted hydro-
phobichydrophilic contrasting MALDI-TOF target10 Because
of the larger sample volumes of urine and the number of
iterations used the time spent to run the assays were sim20-
minutessample MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and data
analysis were performed on all samples as described previ-
ously10 Acquired mass spectra all had mass accuracy within
001 which was sufficient to correctly identify target proteins
Results and Discussion
The analysis of urine directly with MALDI-TOF MS is shown
in Figure 1 The spectrum was produced by diluting human
urine (Individual 1) by a factor of 20 in double distilled water
and serves as a control (point of reference) for the MSIA process A dilution of urine was required in order to reduce
the high salt content of the biological fluid which would
otherwise disrupt the MALDI process Only small peptides are
observed
-2-Microglobulin ( 2m) 2m is a low molecular weight
protein (11 729 Da) which was identified as a light chain of
the class I major histocompatability antigens15 Found in most
biological fluids elevated levels of 2m in blood and urine can
result from a number of ailments (ie AIDS16 rheumatoid
arthritis17 leukemia18) Glycation of 2m the covalent attach-
ment of a reducing sugar is commonly observed in individuals
Figure 1 Mass spectrum of urine diluted 120 Small peptides
were present whereas target proteins were not observed
research articles Kiernan et al
192 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 37
with one of a number of metabolic disorders (ie diabetes
mellitus uremia hypoglycemia etc) resulting in advancedglycation end products (AGEs)1920 Moreover 2m has also
been pathogenically associated in many amyloid disorders
including dialysis related amyloidosis (DRA)21
Analyses of the human urine samples with anti- 2m MSIA
are shown in Figure 2 with wild-type (wt-) 2m seen in the mass
spectra of all study participants Inter-individual results are all
very similar as shown in Figure 2 inlet except for Trace E in
which a glycated 2m variant is present in relatively high
abundance Glycated 2m is the result of excess dietary
reducing sugars present in the blood nonenzymatically attach-
ing to free amine groups of local proteins through the ldquoMaillard
reactionrdquo that can result in a number of possible Amidori
products2223 The observed glycated 2m in Figure 2-Trace E
has a measured mass increase of sim146 Da which correspondsto an imidazolone formation an Amidori product consisting
of a cyclic ring formed between a reduced sugar and an arginine
residue This 2m variant was originally observed by Niwa et
al in amyloid plaque deposits22 but was then postulated to
be artifacts of the overexposure of the insoluble 2m plaques
to normal levels of blood reducing sugars The data presented
here is the first report of imidazolone-modified 2m from a
human biological fluid and demonstrates that this unique form
of glycation can be found on native unplaqued 2m The
individual whose results were shown in Trace E was diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer and clinical studies have shown a
strong correlation between the development of the pancreatic
cancer and diabetes mellitus 2425 Hence the presence of AGEs
in this patient might be suggestive of the presence of a
metabolic disease such as diabetes mellitus but due to a lack
of symptoms the patient was not tested at the time of sample
collection
Transthyretin (TTR) TTR the second target is a thyroid
hormone carrier found in high levels in both serum and
cerebral spinal fluid Produced mainly in the liver TTR forms
a homotetramer2627 and is often complexed with other proteins
in the transport of various biologically active compounds
Structurally wt-TTR comprises 127 amino acids and has a MW
of 13 762 Over 80 point mutations have been cataloged for
TTR with all but 10 potentially leading to severe complica-
tions28 The majority of these mutation-related disorders are
caused by amyloid plaques depositing on various tissues
eventually leading to complex dysfunctions including carpal
tunnel syndrome drussen and familial amyloid poly-
neuropathy29-32 Multiple TTR post-translational modifications
have been previously detected in the plasma of healthy
individuals33 due mostly to TTR having a free cysteine residue
which commonly react with other sulfhydrils cysteines glu-
tathions etcFigure 3 shows the result of the urinary MSIA analyses of
TTR Both wt- and post-translationally modified (PTM) forms
of intact TTR are readily apparent in all five traces This in itself
is novel due to conflicting reports regarding proximal tubular
reabsorption and the presence of TTR in urine3433 The most
abundant PTM observed is the cysteinylated (cys) form ∆m )
+119 Da Expanded views of the singly charged TTR signals
shown in each corresponding Figure 3 inlet clearly show that
ratios between the PTM and the wild-type forms of TTR vary
between all individuals analyzed Moreover the TTR signal
shown in Figure 3-Trace B exhibits peak splitting which is
indicative of the presence of a heterozygous point mutation
The resolution of the linear TOF MS (m ∆m ) sim1000) is
sufficient to determine the mass shift of the variant to be sim+
30 Da This approximate mass shift is accurate enough to
decrease number of possible variants from 80 to sim7 The results
shown in Figure 3-Trace B would normally warrant further
protein characterization ie enzymatic digestion however
previous MSIA plasma-based studies involving the same indi-
vidual have already determined the point mutation to be a
Thr119Met substitution11
Cystatin C (CYSC) Cystatin C (CYSC) is an extracellular
cysteine protease inhibitor found in most biological fluids Even
though CYSC is freely filtered by the glomerulus urinary levels
of CYSC are a poor marker for glomerular filtration due to
Figure2 Mass spectrometric results of urinary 2m MSIA Signal
from wild-type 2m is consistent in all five traces however Trace
E also contains a high proportion of glycated 2m Glycation
resulted in a + 146 Da mass shift due to the covalent modification
by a deoxyhexose Figure 3 Comparison of urinary TTR MSIA Both the wild-type
and a post-translationally modified (cysteinylation ∆m ) +128
Da) forms are seen in all five traces While varied amounts of
cysteinylated TTR are seen present in each sample TraceB alsoshows the presence of a variant form of the TTR protein Peak
splitting sim∆m ) +30 is observed in the wild-type and the
cysteinylated forms of TTR because of two forms of the protein
being expressed a w ild-type and mutant that are eventually
excreted into urine
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 193
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 47
tubular reabsorption35 but have been used as a reliable
measure of proximal tubular reabsorption which has been
linked to renal failure36 Moreover hereditary cerebral hemor-
rhage with amyloidosis (HCHWA) an autosomal dominant
disorder prevalent in Icelandic Dutch and Finish populations
is the result of a CYSC Leu68f Gln variant37 This variant of
CYSC results in amyloid deposits of the walls of cerebral
arteries A number of carcinoma cell lines have also been
reported to secrete CYSC leading to investigations of its role
as a possible tumor marker CYSC also has several PTMassociated with it most notable is the hydroxylation of a Pro
residue at position 336 which results in a mass shift of the wt-
CYSC protein by sim+16 Da
The results of the anti-CYSC MSIA analyses are shown in
Figure 4 in which very similar protein profiles are observed
between all subjects The mass spectrometric analysis was able
to sufficiently resolve the wt- (13 344 Da) and the hydroxylated
form (13 360 Da) of CYSC m ∆m ) sim1000 Varied amounts of
hydroxylation are seen between each individual Multiple
N-terminally truncated forms of CYSC are also present most
notable are the S- (13 256 Da) and SSP- (13 072 Da) Hy-
droxylation still occurs in the S- variant (13 272 Da) but is
lost with the cleavage of the P- at position 3 Further truncated
forms of CYSC are observed in Traces D and E in which
SSPGKPPR- (12 536 Da) SSPGKPPRL- (12 423 Da) and SSPGK-
PPRLV - (12 324 Da) are also present The degradation of CYSC
has been reported from a significant portion of native urine
samples to date36 but this CYSC profiling clearly shows that
this catabolic process is conserved a N-terminal proteolytic
process
Urine Protein 1 UP1 also known as Clara cell protein CC10
or uteroglobin is a biomarker for a variety of pulmonary
ailments and urinary tract dysfunctions UP1 is a small protein
MW ) 7909 that is primarily secreted by Clara cells in the
bronchi alveolar lining in mammalian lung tissue is an anti-
inflammatory agent38 but to date its physiological role is stilllargely unclear The native state of UP1 is a covalently associ-
ated homodimer which results from the disulfide cross bridg-
ing between two UP1 monomers39 When damage occurs to
the respiratory tract plasma and urine UP1 levels increase due
to increased bronchioalveolar permeability and the overloading
of the tubular reabsorption process respectively4041 Moreover
increased UP1 concentration in urine alone basal levels 5-10
microgL41 is often an indication of proximal tubular dysfunction42
whereas decreased UP1 plasma levels have been found in
smokers43 asthmatics44 and schizophrenics45
Figure 5 shows the results of the qualitative urinary UP1
MSIA analysis Dimerized UP1 with MW ) 15 819 is present in
all five traces Although multiple charging of UP1 during the
MALDI process is unable to directly differentiate betweenpotential UP1 monomers and the +2 state of the UP1 dimer
conjugated monomers are readily identifiable Because wt-UP1
monomer would have exposed free cysteine groups some sort
of chemical modification through these reactive sulfhydryls
would be expected as seen in TTR Closer examination in the
Figure 5 inlets shows that both Traces A and B contain UP1
monomer with varied amounts of glutathion conjugate (∆m )
+305 Da) associated Although being virtually undetectable in
Traces C-E this is the first reported incidence of UP1
monomer being detected These results suggest that the
individualsrsquo results shown in Traces A and B have more
glutathion andor UP1 monomer present in their systems
Whether this observation is associated with health state or
significant to disease has yet to be determined
Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) RBP was the fifth urine
protein target A member of the lipocalin family RBP has a
plasma concentration level of sim50 mgL and serves the role of
the major carrier of retinol (vitamin A) from the liver to
peripheral tissues46 With a molecular weight of 21 065 RBP is
believed to escape glomerular filtration by associating with the
homotetramer of transthyretin in its holo- (retinol bound)
form47 RBP has been previously reported to exist in two post-
translationally truncated versions one missing the C-terminal
Leucine (RBP-(Leu)) and the second missing two C-terminal
leucines (RBP-(Leu-Leu)) which are believed to be nonfunc-
Figure 4 Results of urinary CYSC MSIA analysis Both the wild-
type and hydroxylated (∆m ) +16Da) forms of CYSC are present
in all five traces Varied amounts of hydroxylated CYSC are seen
in each individual as well as multiple truncated forms of theprotein These truncations include the systematic N-terminal
cleavage of S- SSP- and SSPG- Extensive cleavage of CYSC
with the loss of SSPGKPPR- SSPGKPPRL- and SSPGKPPRLV-
are only seen in Traces D and E
Figure 5 Mass spectrometric results of urinary UP1 MSIA
Dimerized UP1 (MW ) 15 819) is seen in all five traces but Traces
A and B both contain large proportions of UP1 monomer
conjugated to glutathion (∆m ) +305 Da)
research articles Kiernan et al
194 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 57
tional variants of RBP due to their lower binding affinities to
the transthyretin complex48
The results of the urinary RBP analysis are shown in Figure
6 Conserved protein profiles are seen in Traces A -D with wt-
RBP along with -L -LL -RNLL and -RSERNLL C-terminally
truncated variants The source and function of these variants
are still unknown but have been determined to be the result
of some unreported enzymatic process that occurs after the
RBP is filtered from the blood14 Interestingly the individual
with pancreatic cancer in Figure 6-Trace E displays an altered
RBP profile Most notable is the marked relative decrease in
the amount of wt-RBP present Similar results were reported
with the analysis of urinary RBP of a 94-year old woman with
renal failure stemming from chronic diabetes mellitus in which
wt-RBP was completely absent from the RBP protein expression
profile14
Albumin (ALB) ALB the sixth urine protein target is the
best studied of all plasma proteins49 At sim663 kDa ALB is
considerably larger than any of the previously discussed protein
targets As a multipurpose house-keeping protein ALB serves
a multitude of functions including the binding and transport
of many metallic organic and biochemical compounds anti-
oxidant effects as well as plasma buffering5051
Figure 7 shows the results of the urinary ALB MSIA with the
+1 and the +2 states of ALB are present in all traces Inter-
individual results are all very similar as shown in Figure 7 inlet
except for Trace E in which extensive peak broadening is
observed Since albumin participates in the transport of so
many biological inorganic and pharmacological compounds
adduct formation with one or many of these compounds is
possible Albumin is also known to undergo glycation like 2m
hence the observed peak broadening may be the result of the
formation of an ALB-AGErsquos
Transferrin (TRFE) TRFE the seventh protein target is a
large globular glycoprotein (MW ) 796 kDa) used in the
transport of dietary iron in human plasma52 TRFE readily
crosses the glomerular membrane despite its large size due
to its strong cationic nature53 resulting in urine levels lt019
mgL54 With two N-linked glycosylation sites the heterogeneity
within the sim44 kDa of associated glycan can greatly vary
Figure 8 displays the results of the anti-TRFE MSIA analysis
Strong homology is seen in the results in all five Traces This
homology in TRFE shows that chronic alcoholizm and carbo-
hydrate deficient glycoprotein syndromes (CDGSI or II) were
not present in any of the participants of this study Only Traces
B and E have detectable amounts of TRFE in the +2 state
whereas Trace A does exhibit some tailing in the TRFE signal
Whether these minute differences seen in the TRFE profiles
are related to any disease state or from genetic modificationhas yet to be determined
Human Neutrophil Defensin Peptides (HNP) HNP also
known as the R -defensins was the final urine target in this
study HNP are a family of cysteine-rich cationic peptides 29-
42 amino acids in length secreted from neutrophils The three
most common human neutrophil defensin peptides are HNP-1
(MW ) 3443) HNP-2 (MW ) 3372) and HNP-3 (MW ) 3487)
which are found in plasma urine saliva and sputum5556 These
peptides have demonstrated remarkable antibacterial antifun-
gal and antiviral activities thus suggesting that HNP plays as
strong role innate immunity55
Figure 6 MSIA results of RBP analysis Conserved C-terminal
cleavage pattern is seen in TracesA-D with theloss of -L -LL
-RNLL and -RSERNLL Trace E displays an abnormal RBP
profile due to the noticeable decrease in the amount of wt-RBP
present compared to the truncated forms
Figure 7 Comparison of ALB MSIA analysis ALB +1 and +2
states were detected in all five samples Even though all traces
were acquired using the same instrument settings Trace E
exhibits significant peak broadening of the ALB signal shown
in trace insets as compared to the other ALB signals in the other
traces
Figure 8 Results of TRFE MSIA analysis TRFE (MW ) 796kDa)
was detected in all five samples Only very minor differences
were observed
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 195
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 67
Previous studies into the roles of HNP in various systemic
responses have shown that they partake in large number of
responses including pro-inflammation with histamine release57
as well as cell proliferation and mitogenic effects58 Because of
this last effect more recent studies have suggested a correlation
between HNP and certain cancers59 Other studies have shown
that HNP may also serve as a marker for certain inflammatory
disease states and sepsis6061
Because these peptides are highly cationic immuno-affinity
retrieval is not required Cation exchange MSIA ionically retains
sufficient amounts of HNP to allow for mass spectrometric
detection The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 9 in
which all three major HNP species were detected in all five
samples as shown by the triple peaks Intra-sample concentra-
tion of each HNP species varies from each sample Traces C
and E show that these individuals had more HNP-2 relative to
the other two HNP forms than the other individuals involved
in this study Whether the HNP species ratios are linked to
disease states or are subject to diurnal variation has yet to be
determined
The results of all 40 analyses were summarized for compari-
son in Table 1 which describes structural variations observed
in the target proteins Interestingly the individual diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer showed the most protein variation
compared to the other samples The presence of glycated 2m
and the decrease in wt-RBP were most prominent of all the
differences Similar types of variations have been previously
described from individuals with diabetes mellitus andor ure-
mia but neither of these conditions had been previously
diagnosed in this individual Moreover broadening of this
individualrsquos ALB signal was also observed and may be associ-
ated to albuminrsquos function in bio- and organic-molecule
transport whereas other differences included the increase
truncation of CYSC and altered ratios of HNP-1 and -2 were
seen but not isolated to this individual The analysis of TTR
showed that one individual had a heterozygous point mutation
demonstrating the utility of MSIA in the identification of genetic
variation at the protein level The application of MSIA was ableto also identify monomeric forms of UP1 modified with
glutathion in two individuals In total approximately one-
quarter of the analyses provided variant results from the wild-
type
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that mass spectrometric immu-
noassay is a powerful analytical technique in the study of intact
urinary proteins MSIA allows for the rapid retrieval of specific
protein targets which permits concise identification of each
target species to be achieved Unlike indirect detection as used
in ELISAs mass spectrometry is able to discriminate between
variant forms of a protein target that are present making
identification of all species possible Moreover MSIA is an
analytical technique that allows for comparative protein profil-
ing to look for differences between individuals in specific
protein targets Many of these differences are subtle and could
not be readily distinguished without mass spectrometric detec-
tion As shown here a small study with 40 data points produced
almost a dozen observable differences between 5 individuals
The analysis of 8 protein targets detected 29 different observed
forms of these proteins making mass spectrometry integral for
protein phenotyping The observation of such variation within
such a small study population necessitates the need for larger
urine protein population studies in order to correlate such
findings to possible disease states
Acknowledgment This publication was supported in
part by Grant No R44 GM56603-01 and Contract No N43-DK-
1-2470 from the National Institutes of Health Its contents are
solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official views of the National Institute of Health
References
(1) Burmeister R Boe I M Nykjaer A Jacobsen C Moestrup SK Verroust P Christensen E I Lund J Willnow T E J BiolChem 2001 276 13 295-13 301
(2) Tomlinson P A Dalton R N Turner C Chantler C ClinChim Acta 1990 192 99-106
Table 1 Summary of Protein Profile of All Eight Assays Run on All Five-Study Subjectsa
2m TTR CYTC UP1 RBP ALB TRFE HNP
sample A o o o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o tailing o
sample B o pointmutation
o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o o o
sample C o o o o o o o altered
ratiossample D o o extended
truncations
o o o o o
sample E glycation o extendedtruncations
o decreased wt-RBP
peak broadening
o alteredratios
Figure 9 Mass spectrometric results of HNP analysis Signals
from HNP-1 (MW ) 3443) -2(MW ) 3372) and -3(MW ) 3487)
were detected in all samples Differences in relative amounts of
HNP-1 to HNP-2 are observed between each sample
research articles Kiernan et al
196 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 77
(3) Hansen H P Hovind P Jensen B R Parving H H Kidney Int 2002 61 163-8
(4) Schrader M Schulz-Knappe P Trends Biotechnol 2001 19 S55-60
(5) Yates J R III J Mass Spectrom 1998 33 1-19(6) Neubauer G King A Rappsilber J Calvio C Watson M Ajuh
P Sleeman J Lamond A Mann M Nat Genet 1998 20 46-
50(7) Hampel D J Sansome C Sha M Brodsky S Lawson W E
Goligorsky M S J Am Soc Nephrol 2001 12 1026-35(8) Nelson R W Krone J R Bieber A L Williams P Anal Chem
1995 67 1153-1158
(9) Kiernan U A Doctoral Dissertation Arizona State University2002
(10) Niederkofler E E Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D KiernanU A Williams P Nelson R W Anal Chem 2001 73 3294-
3299(11) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D Niederkof-
ler E E Williams P Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2002 30149-56
(12) Kiernan U A Nedelkov D Tubbs K A Niederkofler E ENelson R W Am Biotech Lab 2002 20 26-28
(13) Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2001289 26-35
(14) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Niederkofler E ENelson R W Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002 297 401
(15) Schardijn G H Statius van Eps L W Kidney Int 1987 32 635-
41(16) Lifson A R Hessol N A Buchbinder S P OrsquoMalley P M
Barnhart L Segal M Katz M H Holmberg S D Lancet 1992
339 1436-40(17) Walters M T Stevenson F K Goswami R Smith J L Cawley
M I Ann Rheum Dis 1989 48 905-11(18) Sadamori N Mine M Hakariya S Ichiba M Kawachi T
Itoyama T Nakamura H Tomonaga M Hayashi K Leukemia 1995 9 594-7
(19) Schwedler S B Metzger T Schinzel R Wanner C Kidney Int2002 62 301-310
(20) Vlassara H Palace M R J Intern Med 2002 251 87-101(21) Kleinman K S Coburn J W Kidney Int 1989 35 567-75(22) Niwa T Katsuzaki T Miyazaki S Momoi T Akiba T
Miyazaki T Nokura K Hayase F Tatemichi N Takei YKidney Int 1997 51 187-94
(23) Humeny A Kislinger T Becker C M Pischetsrieder M J AgricFood Chem 2002 50 2153-2160
(24) Ogawa Y Tanaka M Inoue K Yamaguchi K Chijiiwa KMizumoto K Tsutsu N Nakamura Y Cancer 2002 94 2344-
2349
(25) Wakasugi H Funakoshi A Iguchi H Int J Clin Oncol 20016 50-4
(26) Ingenbleek Y Young V Annu Rev Nutr 1994 14 495-533(27) Schreiber G Richardson S J Comp Biochem Physiol B
Biochem Mol Biol 1997 116 137-60(28) Connors L H Richardson A M Theberge R Costello C E
Amyloid 2000 7 54-69(29) Damas A M Saraiva M J J Struct Biol 2000 130 290-9(30) Mullins R F Russell S R Anderson D H Hageman G S
Faseb J 2000 14 835-46(31) Plante-Bordeneuve V Said G Curr Opin Neurol 2000 13 569-
73(32) Benson M D Uemichi T Amyloid-Int J Exp Clin Invest 1996
3 44-56(33) Terazaki H Ando Y Suhr O Ohlsson P I Obayashi K
Yamashita T Yoshimatsu S Suga M Uchino M Ando MBiochem Biophys Res Commun 1998 249 26-30
(34) Jacobsson B Lignelid H Bergerheim U S Histopathology 199526 559-64
(35) Woitas R P Stoffel-Wagner B Poege U Schiedermaier PSpengler U Sauerbruch T Clin Chem 2001 47 2179-80
(36) Grubb A O Adv Clin Chem 2000 35 63-99(37) Olafsson I Grubb A Amyloid 2000 7 70-9(38) Dierynck I Bernard A Roels H De Ley M Mult Scler 1996
1 385-7(39) Singh G Katyal S L Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997 17
141-3(40) Hermans C Knoops B Wiedig M Arsalane K Toubeau G
Falmagne P Bernard A Eur Respir J 1999 13 1014-
21(41) Broeckaert F Clippe A Knoops B Hermans C Bernard A Annu N Y Acad Sci 2000 923 68-77
(42) Bernard A M Thielemans N O Lauwerys R R Kidney IntSuppl 1994 47 S34-7
(43) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Shibuya Y Morita YHirasawa M Okutani R Kawai T Abe S Eur Respir J 199710 1108-1114
(44) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Sugaya F Hirasawa M Yamada T Kawai T Abe S Lung 1999 177 45-52
(45) Maes M Bosmans E Ranjan R Vandoolaeghe E MeltzerH Y De Ley M Berghmans R Stans G Desnyder RSchizophr Res 1996 21 39-50
(46) Kanai M Raz A Goodman D S J Clin Invest 1968 47 2025-
44(47) Naylor H M Newcomer M E Biochem 1999 38 2647-53(48) Jaconi S Saurat J H Siegenthaler G Eur J Endocrinol 1996
134 576-82(49) Putnam F In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and
Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Academic Press New York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 58-131
(50) Peters J R T In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Acedemic Press New
York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 133-181(51) Fogh-Andersen N Bjerrum P J Siggaard-Andersen O Clin
Chem 1993 39 48-52(52) Aisen P Wessling-Resnick M Leibold E A Curr Opin Chem
Biol 1999 3 200-6(53) Hong C Y Chia K S J Diabetes Complications 1998 12 43-
60(54) Norden A G Lapsley M Lee P J Pusey C D Scheinman S
J Tam F W Thakker R V Unwin R J Wrong O Kidney Int2001 60 1885-92
(55) Raj P A Dentino A R FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002 206 9 -18(56) Ganz T J Infect Dis 2001 183 Suppl 1 S41-2(57) Befus A D Mowat C Gilchrist M Hu J Solomon S
Bateman A J Immunol 1999 163 947-53(58) Murphy C J Foster B A Mannis M J Selsted M E Reid T
W J Cell Physiol 1993 155 408-13(59) Muller C A Markovic-Lipkovski J Klatt T Gamper J Schwarz
G Beck H Deeg M Kalbacher H Widmann S Wessels JT Becker V Muller G A Flad T Am J Pathol 2002 160 1311-24
(60) Mukae H Iiboshi H Nakazato M Hiratsuka T TokojimaM Abe K Ashitani J Kadota J Matsukura S Kohno SThorax 2002 57 623-8
(61) Thomas N J Carcillo J A Doughty L A Sasser H Heine RP Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002 21 34-8
PR025574C
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 197
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 27
are detected at precise molecular masses mass-shifted variants
of a protein (ie post-translational modifications or point
mutations) are readily detected in a single assay This approach
is contrary to conventional immunoassays where each protein
variant would require an individual monospecific assay which
obviously requires an a priori knowledge of the variants under
investigation (ie a monospecific assay must be constructed
for each variant after the variant is either discovered or
hypothesized) Conversely the MSIA approach is able to
discover as yet unidentified variants of proteins through the useof pan antibodies towards the protein of interest Thus MSIA
when applied to the routine screening of known protein
variants (ie wild-type) holds much potential in the discovery
and identification of variants resulting from post-translational
modifications splicing variations or point mutations
Moreover MSIA in the form of an affinity pipettor tip is
capable of analyzing very low abundance proteins via a
repetitive pipetting action The flowing action of the pipettor
tip concentrates and purifies the target protein prior to MALDI-
TOF MS analysis allowing for routine analyses of protein targets
in the picomolar and sub-picomolar range9 Once in the mass
spectrometer different forms of the same protein are readily
distinguishable by measurable alterations in molecular mass
thus allowing for protein isoform identificationThe general utility of MSIA is not that of generating global
gene product expression profiles as done by many other
proteomics technologies but is that of targeting a specific
protein and analyzing all endogenous forms of the intact target
protein from within a specific human biological fluid In this
manner the exact form(s) of a proteinsrather than those
presumed from a genomic database searchscan be determined
within an individual and slight changes in structure discerned
for (ultimately) correlation with disease Previously MSIA has
been demonstrated in the high throughput quantification and
characterization of various human plasma proteins10-12 but still
has been largely unexploited in the field of urine protein
analyses with the only reported application being the quan-
titation of -2-microglobulin ( 2m)13 and the comparativeprofiling of retinol binding protein (RBP)14 Described here is
the development of further urine-based MSIA assays targeting
transthyretin (TTR) cystatin C (CYSC) urine protein 1 (UP1)
albumin (ALB) transferrin (TRFE) and human neutrophil
defensins (HNP) and a brief study illustrating their use in
profiling these proteins between individuals
Experimental Section
Study Subjects Urine samples were collected from 5 unre-
lated male subjects ages ranging from 26 to 79 Four subjects
ages 26-68 were healthy study participants whereas one
individual age 79 was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer Urine
samples were obtained via protocols approved through IntrinsicBioprobes Incrsquos Internal Review Board (IRB) The individuals
had read and signed an Informed Consent form
Sample Preparation Urine samples 25 mL mid-stream
voids from five individuals were collected The urine was
collected directly into sterile urine collection cups that were
pretreated with 50 microL of the protease inhibitor cocktail consist-
ing of AEBSF (100 mM) aprotin (80 microM) bestatin (5 mM) E-64
(15 mM) leupeptin (2 mM) pepstatin A (1 mM) to prevent
any enzymatic breakdown or modification Samples were
collected and stored at -70degC until ready for analysis Samples
were thawed in a warm water bath (37 degC) just prior to analysis
Sample Analysis Each sample was combined 11 (vv) with
2M ammonium acetate (to adjust the pH to sim68-72) and
poured into an individual poly(vinyl chloride) solution basin
prior to analysis Each sample was individually addressed with
individual MSIA-Tips (Intrinsic Bioprobes Inc) derivatized with
anti- 2m anti-TTR anti-CYSC anti-UP1 anti-RBP anti-ALB
anti-TRFE or carboxylic acid surface (cation exchange for HNP
analysis) All eight analyses were run in parallel through each
sample with MSIA-Tips loaded onto an octapette
The manual incubation of each urine sample consisted of
300 cycles (150 microL of sample) through each MSIA-Tip After
incubation tips were thoroughly rinsed using HBS buffer (10
cycles 150 microL) doubly distilled water (5 cycles 150 microL) 20
acetoniltrile1M ammonium acetate wash (10 cycles 150 microL)
and finally with doubly distilled water (15 cycles 150 microL)
Retained species were eluted by drawing 4 microL of MALDI matrix
solution (saturated aqueous solution of sinapic acid (SA) in
33 (vv) acetonitrile 04 (vv) trifluoroacetic acid) into eachtip and depositing directly onto a 96-well formatted hydro-
phobichydrophilic contrasting MALDI-TOF target10 Because
of the larger sample volumes of urine and the number of
iterations used the time spent to run the assays were sim20-
minutessample MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and data
analysis were performed on all samples as described previ-
ously10 Acquired mass spectra all had mass accuracy within
001 which was sufficient to correctly identify target proteins
Results and Discussion
The analysis of urine directly with MALDI-TOF MS is shown
in Figure 1 The spectrum was produced by diluting human
urine (Individual 1) by a factor of 20 in double distilled water
and serves as a control (point of reference) for the MSIA process A dilution of urine was required in order to reduce
the high salt content of the biological fluid which would
otherwise disrupt the MALDI process Only small peptides are
observed
-2-Microglobulin ( 2m) 2m is a low molecular weight
protein (11 729 Da) which was identified as a light chain of
the class I major histocompatability antigens15 Found in most
biological fluids elevated levels of 2m in blood and urine can
result from a number of ailments (ie AIDS16 rheumatoid
arthritis17 leukemia18) Glycation of 2m the covalent attach-
ment of a reducing sugar is commonly observed in individuals
Figure 1 Mass spectrum of urine diluted 120 Small peptides
were present whereas target proteins were not observed
research articles Kiernan et al
192 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 37
with one of a number of metabolic disorders (ie diabetes
mellitus uremia hypoglycemia etc) resulting in advancedglycation end products (AGEs)1920 Moreover 2m has also
been pathogenically associated in many amyloid disorders
including dialysis related amyloidosis (DRA)21
Analyses of the human urine samples with anti- 2m MSIA
are shown in Figure 2 with wild-type (wt-) 2m seen in the mass
spectra of all study participants Inter-individual results are all
very similar as shown in Figure 2 inlet except for Trace E in
which a glycated 2m variant is present in relatively high
abundance Glycated 2m is the result of excess dietary
reducing sugars present in the blood nonenzymatically attach-
ing to free amine groups of local proteins through the ldquoMaillard
reactionrdquo that can result in a number of possible Amidori
products2223 The observed glycated 2m in Figure 2-Trace E
has a measured mass increase of sim146 Da which correspondsto an imidazolone formation an Amidori product consisting
of a cyclic ring formed between a reduced sugar and an arginine
residue This 2m variant was originally observed by Niwa et
al in amyloid plaque deposits22 but was then postulated to
be artifacts of the overexposure of the insoluble 2m plaques
to normal levels of blood reducing sugars The data presented
here is the first report of imidazolone-modified 2m from a
human biological fluid and demonstrates that this unique form
of glycation can be found on native unplaqued 2m The
individual whose results were shown in Trace E was diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer and clinical studies have shown a
strong correlation between the development of the pancreatic
cancer and diabetes mellitus 2425 Hence the presence of AGEs
in this patient might be suggestive of the presence of a
metabolic disease such as diabetes mellitus but due to a lack
of symptoms the patient was not tested at the time of sample
collection
Transthyretin (TTR) TTR the second target is a thyroid
hormone carrier found in high levels in both serum and
cerebral spinal fluid Produced mainly in the liver TTR forms
a homotetramer2627 and is often complexed with other proteins
in the transport of various biologically active compounds
Structurally wt-TTR comprises 127 amino acids and has a MW
of 13 762 Over 80 point mutations have been cataloged for
TTR with all but 10 potentially leading to severe complica-
tions28 The majority of these mutation-related disorders are
caused by amyloid plaques depositing on various tissues
eventually leading to complex dysfunctions including carpal
tunnel syndrome drussen and familial amyloid poly-
neuropathy29-32 Multiple TTR post-translational modifications
have been previously detected in the plasma of healthy
individuals33 due mostly to TTR having a free cysteine residue
which commonly react with other sulfhydrils cysteines glu-
tathions etcFigure 3 shows the result of the urinary MSIA analyses of
TTR Both wt- and post-translationally modified (PTM) forms
of intact TTR are readily apparent in all five traces This in itself
is novel due to conflicting reports regarding proximal tubular
reabsorption and the presence of TTR in urine3433 The most
abundant PTM observed is the cysteinylated (cys) form ∆m )
+119 Da Expanded views of the singly charged TTR signals
shown in each corresponding Figure 3 inlet clearly show that
ratios between the PTM and the wild-type forms of TTR vary
between all individuals analyzed Moreover the TTR signal
shown in Figure 3-Trace B exhibits peak splitting which is
indicative of the presence of a heterozygous point mutation
The resolution of the linear TOF MS (m ∆m ) sim1000) is
sufficient to determine the mass shift of the variant to be sim+
30 Da This approximate mass shift is accurate enough to
decrease number of possible variants from 80 to sim7 The results
shown in Figure 3-Trace B would normally warrant further
protein characterization ie enzymatic digestion however
previous MSIA plasma-based studies involving the same indi-
vidual have already determined the point mutation to be a
Thr119Met substitution11
Cystatin C (CYSC) Cystatin C (CYSC) is an extracellular
cysteine protease inhibitor found in most biological fluids Even
though CYSC is freely filtered by the glomerulus urinary levels
of CYSC are a poor marker for glomerular filtration due to
Figure2 Mass spectrometric results of urinary 2m MSIA Signal
from wild-type 2m is consistent in all five traces however Trace
E also contains a high proportion of glycated 2m Glycation
resulted in a + 146 Da mass shift due to the covalent modification
by a deoxyhexose Figure 3 Comparison of urinary TTR MSIA Both the wild-type
and a post-translationally modified (cysteinylation ∆m ) +128
Da) forms are seen in all five traces While varied amounts of
cysteinylated TTR are seen present in each sample TraceB alsoshows the presence of a variant form of the TTR protein Peak
splitting sim∆m ) +30 is observed in the wild-type and the
cysteinylated forms of TTR because of two forms of the protein
being expressed a w ild-type and mutant that are eventually
excreted into urine
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 193
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 47
tubular reabsorption35 but have been used as a reliable
measure of proximal tubular reabsorption which has been
linked to renal failure36 Moreover hereditary cerebral hemor-
rhage with amyloidosis (HCHWA) an autosomal dominant
disorder prevalent in Icelandic Dutch and Finish populations
is the result of a CYSC Leu68f Gln variant37 This variant of
CYSC results in amyloid deposits of the walls of cerebral
arteries A number of carcinoma cell lines have also been
reported to secrete CYSC leading to investigations of its role
as a possible tumor marker CYSC also has several PTMassociated with it most notable is the hydroxylation of a Pro
residue at position 336 which results in a mass shift of the wt-
CYSC protein by sim+16 Da
The results of the anti-CYSC MSIA analyses are shown in
Figure 4 in which very similar protein profiles are observed
between all subjects The mass spectrometric analysis was able
to sufficiently resolve the wt- (13 344 Da) and the hydroxylated
form (13 360 Da) of CYSC m ∆m ) sim1000 Varied amounts of
hydroxylation are seen between each individual Multiple
N-terminally truncated forms of CYSC are also present most
notable are the S- (13 256 Da) and SSP- (13 072 Da) Hy-
droxylation still occurs in the S- variant (13 272 Da) but is
lost with the cleavage of the P- at position 3 Further truncated
forms of CYSC are observed in Traces D and E in which
SSPGKPPR- (12 536 Da) SSPGKPPRL- (12 423 Da) and SSPGK-
PPRLV - (12 324 Da) are also present The degradation of CYSC
has been reported from a significant portion of native urine
samples to date36 but this CYSC profiling clearly shows that
this catabolic process is conserved a N-terminal proteolytic
process
Urine Protein 1 UP1 also known as Clara cell protein CC10
or uteroglobin is a biomarker for a variety of pulmonary
ailments and urinary tract dysfunctions UP1 is a small protein
MW ) 7909 that is primarily secreted by Clara cells in the
bronchi alveolar lining in mammalian lung tissue is an anti-
inflammatory agent38 but to date its physiological role is stilllargely unclear The native state of UP1 is a covalently associ-
ated homodimer which results from the disulfide cross bridg-
ing between two UP1 monomers39 When damage occurs to
the respiratory tract plasma and urine UP1 levels increase due
to increased bronchioalveolar permeability and the overloading
of the tubular reabsorption process respectively4041 Moreover
increased UP1 concentration in urine alone basal levels 5-10
microgL41 is often an indication of proximal tubular dysfunction42
whereas decreased UP1 plasma levels have been found in
smokers43 asthmatics44 and schizophrenics45
Figure 5 shows the results of the qualitative urinary UP1
MSIA analysis Dimerized UP1 with MW ) 15 819 is present in
all five traces Although multiple charging of UP1 during the
MALDI process is unable to directly differentiate betweenpotential UP1 monomers and the +2 state of the UP1 dimer
conjugated monomers are readily identifiable Because wt-UP1
monomer would have exposed free cysteine groups some sort
of chemical modification through these reactive sulfhydryls
would be expected as seen in TTR Closer examination in the
Figure 5 inlets shows that both Traces A and B contain UP1
monomer with varied amounts of glutathion conjugate (∆m )
+305 Da) associated Although being virtually undetectable in
Traces C-E this is the first reported incidence of UP1
monomer being detected These results suggest that the
individualsrsquo results shown in Traces A and B have more
glutathion andor UP1 monomer present in their systems
Whether this observation is associated with health state or
significant to disease has yet to be determined
Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) RBP was the fifth urine
protein target A member of the lipocalin family RBP has a
plasma concentration level of sim50 mgL and serves the role of
the major carrier of retinol (vitamin A) from the liver to
peripheral tissues46 With a molecular weight of 21 065 RBP is
believed to escape glomerular filtration by associating with the
homotetramer of transthyretin in its holo- (retinol bound)
form47 RBP has been previously reported to exist in two post-
translationally truncated versions one missing the C-terminal
Leucine (RBP-(Leu)) and the second missing two C-terminal
leucines (RBP-(Leu-Leu)) which are believed to be nonfunc-
Figure 4 Results of urinary CYSC MSIA analysis Both the wild-
type and hydroxylated (∆m ) +16Da) forms of CYSC are present
in all five traces Varied amounts of hydroxylated CYSC are seen
in each individual as well as multiple truncated forms of theprotein These truncations include the systematic N-terminal
cleavage of S- SSP- and SSPG- Extensive cleavage of CYSC
with the loss of SSPGKPPR- SSPGKPPRL- and SSPGKPPRLV-
are only seen in Traces D and E
Figure 5 Mass spectrometric results of urinary UP1 MSIA
Dimerized UP1 (MW ) 15 819) is seen in all five traces but Traces
A and B both contain large proportions of UP1 monomer
conjugated to glutathion (∆m ) +305 Da)
research articles Kiernan et al
194 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 57
tional variants of RBP due to their lower binding affinities to
the transthyretin complex48
The results of the urinary RBP analysis are shown in Figure
6 Conserved protein profiles are seen in Traces A -D with wt-
RBP along with -L -LL -RNLL and -RSERNLL C-terminally
truncated variants The source and function of these variants
are still unknown but have been determined to be the result
of some unreported enzymatic process that occurs after the
RBP is filtered from the blood14 Interestingly the individual
with pancreatic cancer in Figure 6-Trace E displays an altered
RBP profile Most notable is the marked relative decrease in
the amount of wt-RBP present Similar results were reported
with the analysis of urinary RBP of a 94-year old woman with
renal failure stemming from chronic diabetes mellitus in which
wt-RBP was completely absent from the RBP protein expression
profile14
Albumin (ALB) ALB the sixth urine protein target is the
best studied of all plasma proteins49 At sim663 kDa ALB is
considerably larger than any of the previously discussed protein
targets As a multipurpose house-keeping protein ALB serves
a multitude of functions including the binding and transport
of many metallic organic and biochemical compounds anti-
oxidant effects as well as plasma buffering5051
Figure 7 shows the results of the urinary ALB MSIA with the
+1 and the +2 states of ALB are present in all traces Inter-
individual results are all very similar as shown in Figure 7 inlet
except for Trace E in which extensive peak broadening is
observed Since albumin participates in the transport of so
many biological inorganic and pharmacological compounds
adduct formation with one or many of these compounds is
possible Albumin is also known to undergo glycation like 2m
hence the observed peak broadening may be the result of the
formation of an ALB-AGErsquos
Transferrin (TRFE) TRFE the seventh protein target is a
large globular glycoprotein (MW ) 796 kDa) used in the
transport of dietary iron in human plasma52 TRFE readily
crosses the glomerular membrane despite its large size due
to its strong cationic nature53 resulting in urine levels lt019
mgL54 With two N-linked glycosylation sites the heterogeneity
within the sim44 kDa of associated glycan can greatly vary
Figure 8 displays the results of the anti-TRFE MSIA analysis
Strong homology is seen in the results in all five Traces This
homology in TRFE shows that chronic alcoholizm and carbo-
hydrate deficient glycoprotein syndromes (CDGSI or II) were
not present in any of the participants of this study Only Traces
B and E have detectable amounts of TRFE in the +2 state
whereas Trace A does exhibit some tailing in the TRFE signal
Whether these minute differences seen in the TRFE profiles
are related to any disease state or from genetic modificationhas yet to be determined
Human Neutrophil Defensin Peptides (HNP) HNP also
known as the R -defensins was the final urine target in this
study HNP are a family of cysteine-rich cationic peptides 29-
42 amino acids in length secreted from neutrophils The three
most common human neutrophil defensin peptides are HNP-1
(MW ) 3443) HNP-2 (MW ) 3372) and HNP-3 (MW ) 3487)
which are found in plasma urine saliva and sputum5556 These
peptides have demonstrated remarkable antibacterial antifun-
gal and antiviral activities thus suggesting that HNP plays as
strong role innate immunity55
Figure 6 MSIA results of RBP analysis Conserved C-terminal
cleavage pattern is seen in TracesA-D with theloss of -L -LL
-RNLL and -RSERNLL Trace E displays an abnormal RBP
profile due to the noticeable decrease in the amount of wt-RBP
present compared to the truncated forms
Figure 7 Comparison of ALB MSIA analysis ALB +1 and +2
states were detected in all five samples Even though all traces
were acquired using the same instrument settings Trace E
exhibits significant peak broadening of the ALB signal shown
in trace insets as compared to the other ALB signals in the other
traces
Figure 8 Results of TRFE MSIA analysis TRFE (MW ) 796kDa)
was detected in all five samples Only very minor differences
were observed
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 195
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 67
Previous studies into the roles of HNP in various systemic
responses have shown that they partake in large number of
responses including pro-inflammation with histamine release57
as well as cell proliferation and mitogenic effects58 Because of
this last effect more recent studies have suggested a correlation
between HNP and certain cancers59 Other studies have shown
that HNP may also serve as a marker for certain inflammatory
disease states and sepsis6061
Because these peptides are highly cationic immuno-affinity
retrieval is not required Cation exchange MSIA ionically retains
sufficient amounts of HNP to allow for mass spectrometric
detection The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 9 in
which all three major HNP species were detected in all five
samples as shown by the triple peaks Intra-sample concentra-
tion of each HNP species varies from each sample Traces C
and E show that these individuals had more HNP-2 relative to
the other two HNP forms than the other individuals involved
in this study Whether the HNP species ratios are linked to
disease states or are subject to diurnal variation has yet to be
determined
The results of all 40 analyses were summarized for compari-
son in Table 1 which describes structural variations observed
in the target proteins Interestingly the individual diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer showed the most protein variation
compared to the other samples The presence of glycated 2m
and the decrease in wt-RBP were most prominent of all the
differences Similar types of variations have been previously
described from individuals with diabetes mellitus andor ure-
mia but neither of these conditions had been previously
diagnosed in this individual Moreover broadening of this
individualrsquos ALB signal was also observed and may be associ-
ated to albuminrsquos function in bio- and organic-molecule
transport whereas other differences included the increase
truncation of CYSC and altered ratios of HNP-1 and -2 were
seen but not isolated to this individual The analysis of TTR
showed that one individual had a heterozygous point mutation
demonstrating the utility of MSIA in the identification of genetic
variation at the protein level The application of MSIA was ableto also identify monomeric forms of UP1 modified with
glutathion in two individuals In total approximately one-
quarter of the analyses provided variant results from the wild-
type
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that mass spectrometric immu-
noassay is a powerful analytical technique in the study of intact
urinary proteins MSIA allows for the rapid retrieval of specific
protein targets which permits concise identification of each
target species to be achieved Unlike indirect detection as used
in ELISAs mass spectrometry is able to discriminate between
variant forms of a protein target that are present making
identification of all species possible Moreover MSIA is an
analytical technique that allows for comparative protein profil-
ing to look for differences between individuals in specific
protein targets Many of these differences are subtle and could
not be readily distinguished without mass spectrometric detec-
tion As shown here a small study with 40 data points produced
almost a dozen observable differences between 5 individuals
The analysis of 8 protein targets detected 29 different observed
forms of these proteins making mass spectrometry integral for
protein phenotyping The observation of such variation within
such a small study population necessitates the need for larger
urine protein population studies in order to correlate such
findings to possible disease states
Acknowledgment This publication was supported in
part by Grant No R44 GM56603-01 and Contract No N43-DK-
1-2470 from the National Institutes of Health Its contents are
solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official views of the National Institute of Health
References
(1) Burmeister R Boe I M Nykjaer A Jacobsen C Moestrup SK Verroust P Christensen E I Lund J Willnow T E J BiolChem 2001 276 13 295-13 301
(2) Tomlinson P A Dalton R N Turner C Chantler C ClinChim Acta 1990 192 99-106
Table 1 Summary of Protein Profile of All Eight Assays Run on All Five-Study Subjectsa
2m TTR CYTC UP1 RBP ALB TRFE HNP
sample A o o o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o tailing o
sample B o pointmutation
o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o o o
sample C o o o o o o o altered
ratiossample D o o extended
truncations
o o o o o
sample E glycation o extendedtruncations
o decreased wt-RBP
peak broadening
o alteredratios
Figure 9 Mass spectrometric results of HNP analysis Signals
from HNP-1 (MW ) 3443) -2(MW ) 3372) and -3(MW ) 3487)
were detected in all samples Differences in relative amounts of
HNP-1 to HNP-2 are observed between each sample
research articles Kiernan et al
196 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 77
(3) Hansen H P Hovind P Jensen B R Parving H H Kidney Int 2002 61 163-8
(4) Schrader M Schulz-Knappe P Trends Biotechnol 2001 19 S55-60
(5) Yates J R III J Mass Spectrom 1998 33 1-19(6) Neubauer G King A Rappsilber J Calvio C Watson M Ajuh
P Sleeman J Lamond A Mann M Nat Genet 1998 20 46-
50(7) Hampel D J Sansome C Sha M Brodsky S Lawson W E
Goligorsky M S J Am Soc Nephrol 2001 12 1026-35(8) Nelson R W Krone J R Bieber A L Williams P Anal Chem
1995 67 1153-1158
(9) Kiernan U A Doctoral Dissertation Arizona State University2002
(10) Niederkofler E E Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D KiernanU A Williams P Nelson R W Anal Chem 2001 73 3294-
3299(11) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D Niederkof-
ler E E Williams P Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2002 30149-56
(12) Kiernan U A Nedelkov D Tubbs K A Niederkofler E ENelson R W Am Biotech Lab 2002 20 26-28
(13) Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2001289 26-35
(14) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Niederkofler E ENelson R W Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002 297 401
(15) Schardijn G H Statius van Eps L W Kidney Int 1987 32 635-
41(16) Lifson A R Hessol N A Buchbinder S P OrsquoMalley P M
Barnhart L Segal M Katz M H Holmberg S D Lancet 1992
339 1436-40(17) Walters M T Stevenson F K Goswami R Smith J L Cawley
M I Ann Rheum Dis 1989 48 905-11(18) Sadamori N Mine M Hakariya S Ichiba M Kawachi T
Itoyama T Nakamura H Tomonaga M Hayashi K Leukemia 1995 9 594-7
(19) Schwedler S B Metzger T Schinzel R Wanner C Kidney Int2002 62 301-310
(20) Vlassara H Palace M R J Intern Med 2002 251 87-101(21) Kleinman K S Coburn J W Kidney Int 1989 35 567-75(22) Niwa T Katsuzaki T Miyazaki S Momoi T Akiba T
Miyazaki T Nokura K Hayase F Tatemichi N Takei YKidney Int 1997 51 187-94
(23) Humeny A Kislinger T Becker C M Pischetsrieder M J AgricFood Chem 2002 50 2153-2160
(24) Ogawa Y Tanaka M Inoue K Yamaguchi K Chijiiwa KMizumoto K Tsutsu N Nakamura Y Cancer 2002 94 2344-
2349
(25) Wakasugi H Funakoshi A Iguchi H Int J Clin Oncol 20016 50-4
(26) Ingenbleek Y Young V Annu Rev Nutr 1994 14 495-533(27) Schreiber G Richardson S J Comp Biochem Physiol B
Biochem Mol Biol 1997 116 137-60(28) Connors L H Richardson A M Theberge R Costello C E
Amyloid 2000 7 54-69(29) Damas A M Saraiva M J J Struct Biol 2000 130 290-9(30) Mullins R F Russell S R Anderson D H Hageman G S
Faseb J 2000 14 835-46(31) Plante-Bordeneuve V Said G Curr Opin Neurol 2000 13 569-
73(32) Benson M D Uemichi T Amyloid-Int J Exp Clin Invest 1996
3 44-56(33) Terazaki H Ando Y Suhr O Ohlsson P I Obayashi K
Yamashita T Yoshimatsu S Suga M Uchino M Ando MBiochem Biophys Res Commun 1998 249 26-30
(34) Jacobsson B Lignelid H Bergerheim U S Histopathology 199526 559-64
(35) Woitas R P Stoffel-Wagner B Poege U Schiedermaier PSpengler U Sauerbruch T Clin Chem 2001 47 2179-80
(36) Grubb A O Adv Clin Chem 2000 35 63-99(37) Olafsson I Grubb A Amyloid 2000 7 70-9(38) Dierynck I Bernard A Roels H De Ley M Mult Scler 1996
1 385-7(39) Singh G Katyal S L Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997 17
141-3(40) Hermans C Knoops B Wiedig M Arsalane K Toubeau G
Falmagne P Bernard A Eur Respir J 1999 13 1014-
21(41) Broeckaert F Clippe A Knoops B Hermans C Bernard A Annu N Y Acad Sci 2000 923 68-77
(42) Bernard A M Thielemans N O Lauwerys R R Kidney IntSuppl 1994 47 S34-7
(43) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Shibuya Y Morita YHirasawa M Okutani R Kawai T Abe S Eur Respir J 199710 1108-1114
(44) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Sugaya F Hirasawa M Yamada T Kawai T Abe S Lung 1999 177 45-52
(45) Maes M Bosmans E Ranjan R Vandoolaeghe E MeltzerH Y De Ley M Berghmans R Stans G Desnyder RSchizophr Res 1996 21 39-50
(46) Kanai M Raz A Goodman D S J Clin Invest 1968 47 2025-
44(47) Naylor H M Newcomer M E Biochem 1999 38 2647-53(48) Jaconi S Saurat J H Siegenthaler G Eur J Endocrinol 1996
134 576-82(49) Putnam F In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and
Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Academic Press New York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 58-131
(50) Peters J R T In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Acedemic Press New
York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 133-181(51) Fogh-Andersen N Bjerrum P J Siggaard-Andersen O Clin
Chem 1993 39 48-52(52) Aisen P Wessling-Resnick M Leibold E A Curr Opin Chem
Biol 1999 3 200-6(53) Hong C Y Chia K S J Diabetes Complications 1998 12 43-
60(54) Norden A G Lapsley M Lee P J Pusey C D Scheinman S
J Tam F W Thakker R V Unwin R J Wrong O Kidney Int2001 60 1885-92
(55) Raj P A Dentino A R FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002 206 9 -18(56) Ganz T J Infect Dis 2001 183 Suppl 1 S41-2(57) Befus A D Mowat C Gilchrist M Hu J Solomon S
Bateman A J Immunol 1999 163 947-53(58) Murphy C J Foster B A Mannis M J Selsted M E Reid T
W J Cell Physiol 1993 155 408-13(59) Muller C A Markovic-Lipkovski J Klatt T Gamper J Schwarz
G Beck H Deeg M Kalbacher H Widmann S Wessels JT Becker V Muller G A Flad T Am J Pathol 2002 160 1311-24
(60) Mukae H Iiboshi H Nakazato M Hiratsuka T TokojimaM Abe K Ashitani J Kadota J Matsukura S Kohno SThorax 2002 57 623-8
(61) Thomas N J Carcillo J A Doughty L A Sasser H Heine RP Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002 21 34-8
PR025574C
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 197
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 37
with one of a number of metabolic disorders (ie diabetes
mellitus uremia hypoglycemia etc) resulting in advancedglycation end products (AGEs)1920 Moreover 2m has also
been pathogenically associated in many amyloid disorders
including dialysis related amyloidosis (DRA)21
Analyses of the human urine samples with anti- 2m MSIA
are shown in Figure 2 with wild-type (wt-) 2m seen in the mass
spectra of all study participants Inter-individual results are all
very similar as shown in Figure 2 inlet except for Trace E in
which a glycated 2m variant is present in relatively high
abundance Glycated 2m is the result of excess dietary
reducing sugars present in the blood nonenzymatically attach-
ing to free amine groups of local proteins through the ldquoMaillard
reactionrdquo that can result in a number of possible Amidori
products2223 The observed glycated 2m in Figure 2-Trace E
has a measured mass increase of sim146 Da which correspondsto an imidazolone formation an Amidori product consisting
of a cyclic ring formed between a reduced sugar and an arginine
residue This 2m variant was originally observed by Niwa et
al in amyloid plaque deposits22 but was then postulated to
be artifacts of the overexposure of the insoluble 2m plaques
to normal levels of blood reducing sugars The data presented
here is the first report of imidazolone-modified 2m from a
human biological fluid and demonstrates that this unique form
of glycation can be found on native unplaqued 2m The
individual whose results were shown in Trace E was diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer and clinical studies have shown a
strong correlation between the development of the pancreatic
cancer and diabetes mellitus 2425 Hence the presence of AGEs
in this patient might be suggestive of the presence of a
metabolic disease such as diabetes mellitus but due to a lack
of symptoms the patient was not tested at the time of sample
collection
Transthyretin (TTR) TTR the second target is a thyroid
hormone carrier found in high levels in both serum and
cerebral spinal fluid Produced mainly in the liver TTR forms
a homotetramer2627 and is often complexed with other proteins
in the transport of various biologically active compounds
Structurally wt-TTR comprises 127 amino acids and has a MW
of 13 762 Over 80 point mutations have been cataloged for
TTR with all but 10 potentially leading to severe complica-
tions28 The majority of these mutation-related disorders are
caused by amyloid plaques depositing on various tissues
eventually leading to complex dysfunctions including carpal
tunnel syndrome drussen and familial amyloid poly-
neuropathy29-32 Multiple TTR post-translational modifications
have been previously detected in the plasma of healthy
individuals33 due mostly to TTR having a free cysteine residue
which commonly react with other sulfhydrils cysteines glu-
tathions etcFigure 3 shows the result of the urinary MSIA analyses of
TTR Both wt- and post-translationally modified (PTM) forms
of intact TTR are readily apparent in all five traces This in itself
is novel due to conflicting reports regarding proximal tubular
reabsorption and the presence of TTR in urine3433 The most
abundant PTM observed is the cysteinylated (cys) form ∆m )
+119 Da Expanded views of the singly charged TTR signals
shown in each corresponding Figure 3 inlet clearly show that
ratios between the PTM and the wild-type forms of TTR vary
between all individuals analyzed Moreover the TTR signal
shown in Figure 3-Trace B exhibits peak splitting which is
indicative of the presence of a heterozygous point mutation
The resolution of the linear TOF MS (m ∆m ) sim1000) is
sufficient to determine the mass shift of the variant to be sim+
30 Da This approximate mass shift is accurate enough to
decrease number of possible variants from 80 to sim7 The results
shown in Figure 3-Trace B would normally warrant further
protein characterization ie enzymatic digestion however
previous MSIA plasma-based studies involving the same indi-
vidual have already determined the point mutation to be a
Thr119Met substitution11
Cystatin C (CYSC) Cystatin C (CYSC) is an extracellular
cysteine protease inhibitor found in most biological fluids Even
though CYSC is freely filtered by the glomerulus urinary levels
of CYSC are a poor marker for glomerular filtration due to
Figure2 Mass spectrometric results of urinary 2m MSIA Signal
from wild-type 2m is consistent in all five traces however Trace
E also contains a high proportion of glycated 2m Glycation
resulted in a + 146 Da mass shift due to the covalent modification
by a deoxyhexose Figure 3 Comparison of urinary TTR MSIA Both the wild-type
and a post-translationally modified (cysteinylation ∆m ) +128
Da) forms are seen in all five traces While varied amounts of
cysteinylated TTR are seen present in each sample TraceB alsoshows the presence of a variant form of the TTR protein Peak
splitting sim∆m ) +30 is observed in the wild-type and the
cysteinylated forms of TTR because of two forms of the protein
being expressed a w ild-type and mutant that are eventually
excreted into urine
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 193
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 47
tubular reabsorption35 but have been used as a reliable
measure of proximal tubular reabsorption which has been
linked to renal failure36 Moreover hereditary cerebral hemor-
rhage with amyloidosis (HCHWA) an autosomal dominant
disorder prevalent in Icelandic Dutch and Finish populations
is the result of a CYSC Leu68f Gln variant37 This variant of
CYSC results in amyloid deposits of the walls of cerebral
arteries A number of carcinoma cell lines have also been
reported to secrete CYSC leading to investigations of its role
as a possible tumor marker CYSC also has several PTMassociated with it most notable is the hydroxylation of a Pro
residue at position 336 which results in a mass shift of the wt-
CYSC protein by sim+16 Da
The results of the anti-CYSC MSIA analyses are shown in
Figure 4 in which very similar protein profiles are observed
between all subjects The mass spectrometric analysis was able
to sufficiently resolve the wt- (13 344 Da) and the hydroxylated
form (13 360 Da) of CYSC m ∆m ) sim1000 Varied amounts of
hydroxylation are seen between each individual Multiple
N-terminally truncated forms of CYSC are also present most
notable are the S- (13 256 Da) and SSP- (13 072 Da) Hy-
droxylation still occurs in the S- variant (13 272 Da) but is
lost with the cleavage of the P- at position 3 Further truncated
forms of CYSC are observed in Traces D and E in which
SSPGKPPR- (12 536 Da) SSPGKPPRL- (12 423 Da) and SSPGK-
PPRLV - (12 324 Da) are also present The degradation of CYSC
has been reported from a significant portion of native urine
samples to date36 but this CYSC profiling clearly shows that
this catabolic process is conserved a N-terminal proteolytic
process
Urine Protein 1 UP1 also known as Clara cell protein CC10
or uteroglobin is a biomarker for a variety of pulmonary
ailments and urinary tract dysfunctions UP1 is a small protein
MW ) 7909 that is primarily secreted by Clara cells in the
bronchi alveolar lining in mammalian lung tissue is an anti-
inflammatory agent38 but to date its physiological role is stilllargely unclear The native state of UP1 is a covalently associ-
ated homodimer which results from the disulfide cross bridg-
ing between two UP1 monomers39 When damage occurs to
the respiratory tract plasma and urine UP1 levels increase due
to increased bronchioalveolar permeability and the overloading
of the tubular reabsorption process respectively4041 Moreover
increased UP1 concentration in urine alone basal levels 5-10
microgL41 is often an indication of proximal tubular dysfunction42
whereas decreased UP1 plasma levels have been found in
smokers43 asthmatics44 and schizophrenics45
Figure 5 shows the results of the qualitative urinary UP1
MSIA analysis Dimerized UP1 with MW ) 15 819 is present in
all five traces Although multiple charging of UP1 during the
MALDI process is unable to directly differentiate betweenpotential UP1 monomers and the +2 state of the UP1 dimer
conjugated monomers are readily identifiable Because wt-UP1
monomer would have exposed free cysteine groups some sort
of chemical modification through these reactive sulfhydryls
would be expected as seen in TTR Closer examination in the
Figure 5 inlets shows that both Traces A and B contain UP1
monomer with varied amounts of glutathion conjugate (∆m )
+305 Da) associated Although being virtually undetectable in
Traces C-E this is the first reported incidence of UP1
monomer being detected These results suggest that the
individualsrsquo results shown in Traces A and B have more
glutathion andor UP1 monomer present in their systems
Whether this observation is associated with health state or
significant to disease has yet to be determined
Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) RBP was the fifth urine
protein target A member of the lipocalin family RBP has a
plasma concentration level of sim50 mgL and serves the role of
the major carrier of retinol (vitamin A) from the liver to
peripheral tissues46 With a molecular weight of 21 065 RBP is
believed to escape glomerular filtration by associating with the
homotetramer of transthyretin in its holo- (retinol bound)
form47 RBP has been previously reported to exist in two post-
translationally truncated versions one missing the C-terminal
Leucine (RBP-(Leu)) and the second missing two C-terminal
leucines (RBP-(Leu-Leu)) which are believed to be nonfunc-
Figure 4 Results of urinary CYSC MSIA analysis Both the wild-
type and hydroxylated (∆m ) +16Da) forms of CYSC are present
in all five traces Varied amounts of hydroxylated CYSC are seen
in each individual as well as multiple truncated forms of theprotein These truncations include the systematic N-terminal
cleavage of S- SSP- and SSPG- Extensive cleavage of CYSC
with the loss of SSPGKPPR- SSPGKPPRL- and SSPGKPPRLV-
are only seen in Traces D and E
Figure 5 Mass spectrometric results of urinary UP1 MSIA
Dimerized UP1 (MW ) 15 819) is seen in all five traces but Traces
A and B both contain large proportions of UP1 monomer
conjugated to glutathion (∆m ) +305 Da)
research articles Kiernan et al
194 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 57
tional variants of RBP due to their lower binding affinities to
the transthyretin complex48
The results of the urinary RBP analysis are shown in Figure
6 Conserved protein profiles are seen in Traces A -D with wt-
RBP along with -L -LL -RNLL and -RSERNLL C-terminally
truncated variants The source and function of these variants
are still unknown but have been determined to be the result
of some unreported enzymatic process that occurs after the
RBP is filtered from the blood14 Interestingly the individual
with pancreatic cancer in Figure 6-Trace E displays an altered
RBP profile Most notable is the marked relative decrease in
the amount of wt-RBP present Similar results were reported
with the analysis of urinary RBP of a 94-year old woman with
renal failure stemming from chronic diabetes mellitus in which
wt-RBP was completely absent from the RBP protein expression
profile14
Albumin (ALB) ALB the sixth urine protein target is the
best studied of all plasma proteins49 At sim663 kDa ALB is
considerably larger than any of the previously discussed protein
targets As a multipurpose house-keeping protein ALB serves
a multitude of functions including the binding and transport
of many metallic organic and biochemical compounds anti-
oxidant effects as well as plasma buffering5051
Figure 7 shows the results of the urinary ALB MSIA with the
+1 and the +2 states of ALB are present in all traces Inter-
individual results are all very similar as shown in Figure 7 inlet
except for Trace E in which extensive peak broadening is
observed Since albumin participates in the transport of so
many biological inorganic and pharmacological compounds
adduct formation with one or many of these compounds is
possible Albumin is also known to undergo glycation like 2m
hence the observed peak broadening may be the result of the
formation of an ALB-AGErsquos
Transferrin (TRFE) TRFE the seventh protein target is a
large globular glycoprotein (MW ) 796 kDa) used in the
transport of dietary iron in human plasma52 TRFE readily
crosses the glomerular membrane despite its large size due
to its strong cationic nature53 resulting in urine levels lt019
mgL54 With two N-linked glycosylation sites the heterogeneity
within the sim44 kDa of associated glycan can greatly vary
Figure 8 displays the results of the anti-TRFE MSIA analysis
Strong homology is seen in the results in all five Traces This
homology in TRFE shows that chronic alcoholizm and carbo-
hydrate deficient glycoprotein syndromes (CDGSI or II) were
not present in any of the participants of this study Only Traces
B and E have detectable amounts of TRFE in the +2 state
whereas Trace A does exhibit some tailing in the TRFE signal
Whether these minute differences seen in the TRFE profiles
are related to any disease state or from genetic modificationhas yet to be determined
Human Neutrophil Defensin Peptides (HNP) HNP also
known as the R -defensins was the final urine target in this
study HNP are a family of cysteine-rich cationic peptides 29-
42 amino acids in length secreted from neutrophils The three
most common human neutrophil defensin peptides are HNP-1
(MW ) 3443) HNP-2 (MW ) 3372) and HNP-3 (MW ) 3487)
which are found in plasma urine saliva and sputum5556 These
peptides have demonstrated remarkable antibacterial antifun-
gal and antiviral activities thus suggesting that HNP plays as
strong role innate immunity55
Figure 6 MSIA results of RBP analysis Conserved C-terminal
cleavage pattern is seen in TracesA-D with theloss of -L -LL
-RNLL and -RSERNLL Trace E displays an abnormal RBP
profile due to the noticeable decrease in the amount of wt-RBP
present compared to the truncated forms
Figure 7 Comparison of ALB MSIA analysis ALB +1 and +2
states were detected in all five samples Even though all traces
were acquired using the same instrument settings Trace E
exhibits significant peak broadening of the ALB signal shown
in trace insets as compared to the other ALB signals in the other
traces
Figure 8 Results of TRFE MSIA analysis TRFE (MW ) 796kDa)
was detected in all five samples Only very minor differences
were observed
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 195
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 67
Previous studies into the roles of HNP in various systemic
responses have shown that they partake in large number of
responses including pro-inflammation with histamine release57
as well as cell proliferation and mitogenic effects58 Because of
this last effect more recent studies have suggested a correlation
between HNP and certain cancers59 Other studies have shown
that HNP may also serve as a marker for certain inflammatory
disease states and sepsis6061
Because these peptides are highly cationic immuno-affinity
retrieval is not required Cation exchange MSIA ionically retains
sufficient amounts of HNP to allow for mass spectrometric
detection The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 9 in
which all three major HNP species were detected in all five
samples as shown by the triple peaks Intra-sample concentra-
tion of each HNP species varies from each sample Traces C
and E show that these individuals had more HNP-2 relative to
the other two HNP forms than the other individuals involved
in this study Whether the HNP species ratios are linked to
disease states or are subject to diurnal variation has yet to be
determined
The results of all 40 analyses were summarized for compari-
son in Table 1 which describes structural variations observed
in the target proteins Interestingly the individual diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer showed the most protein variation
compared to the other samples The presence of glycated 2m
and the decrease in wt-RBP were most prominent of all the
differences Similar types of variations have been previously
described from individuals with diabetes mellitus andor ure-
mia but neither of these conditions had been previously
diagnosed in this individual Moreover broadening of this
individualrsquos ALB signal was also observed and may be associ-
ated to albuminrsquos function in bio- and organic-molecule
transport whereas other differences included the increase
truncation of CYSC and altered ratios of HNP-1 and -2 were
seen but not isolated to this individual The analysis of TTR
showed that one individual had a heterozygous point mutation
demonstrating the utility of MSIA in the identification of genetic
variation at the protein level The application of MSIA was ableto also identify monomeric forms of UP1 modified with
glutathion in two individuals In total approximately one-
quarter of the analyses provided variant results from the wild-
type
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that mass spectrometric immu-
noassay is a powerful analytical technique in the study of intact
urinary proteins MSIA allows for the rapid retrieval of specific
protein targets which permits concise identification of each
target species to be achieved Unlike indirect detection as used
in ELISAs mass spectrometry is able to discriminate between
variant forms of a protein target that are present making
identification of all species possible Moreover MSIA is an
analytical technique that allows for comparative protein profil-
ing to look for differences between individuals in specific
protein targets Many of these differences are subtle and could
not be readily distinguished without mass spectrometric detec-
tion As shown here a small study with 40 data points produced
almost a dozen observable differences between 5 individuals
The analysis of 8 protein targets detected 29 different observed
forms of these proteins making mass spectrometry integral for
protein phenotyping The observation of such variation within
such a small study population necessitates the need for larger
urine protein population studies in order to correlate such
findings to possible disease states
Acknowledgment This publication was supported in
part by Grant No R44 GM56603-01 and Contract No N43-DK-
1-2470 from the National Institutes of Health Its contents are
solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official views of the National Institute of Health
References
(1) Burmeister R Boe I M Nykjaer A Jacobsen C Moestrup SK Verroust P Christensen E I Lund J Willnow T E J BiolChem 2001 276 13 295-13 301
(2) Tomlinson P A Dalton R N Turner C Chantler C ClinChim Acta 1990 192 99-106
Table 1 Summary of Protein Profile of All Eight Assays Run on All Five-Study Subjectsa
2m TTR CYTC UP1 RBP ALB TRFE HNP
sample A o o o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o tailing o
sample B o pointmutation
o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o o o
sample C o o o o o o o altered
ratiossample D o o extended
truncations
o o o o o
sample E glycation o extendedtruncations
o decreased wt-RBP
peak broadening
o alteredratios
Figure 9 Mass spectrometric results of HNP analysis Signals
from HNP-1 (MW ) 3443) -2(MW ) 3372) and -3(MW ) 3487)
were detected in all samples Differences in relative amounts of
HNP-1 to HNP-2 are observed between each sample
research articles Kiernan et al
196 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 77
(3) Hansen H P Hovind P Jensen B R Parving H H Kidney Int 2002 61 163-8
(4) Schrader M Schulz-Knappe P Trends Biotechnol 2001 19 S55-60
(5) Yates J R III J Mass Spectrom 1998 33 1-19(6) Neubauer G King A Rappsilber J Calvio C Watson M Ajuh
P Sleeman J Lamond A Mann M Nat Genet 1998 20 46-
50(7) Hampel D J Sansome C Sha M Brodsky S Lawson W E
Goligorsky M S J Am Soc Nephrol 2001 12 1026-35(8) Nelson R W Krone J R Bieber A L Williams P Anal Chem
1995 67 1153-1158
(9) Kiernan U A Doctoral Dissertation Arizona State University2002
(10) Niederkofler E E Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D KiernanU A Williams P Nelson R W Anal Chem 2001 73 3294-
3299(11) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D Niederkof-
ler E E Williams P Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2002 30149-56
(12) Kiernan U A Nedelkov D Tubbs K A Niederkofler E ENelson R W Am Biotech Lab 2002 20 26-28
(13) Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2001289 26-35
(14) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Niederkofler E ENelson R W Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002 297 401
(15) Schardijn G H Statius van Eps L W Kidney Int 1987 32 635-
41(16) Lifson A R Hessol N A Buchbinder S P OrsquoMalley P M
Barnhart L Segal M Katz M H Holmberg S D Lancet 1992
339 1436-40(17) Walters M T Stevenson F K Goswami R Smith J L Cawley
M I Ann Rheum Dis 1989 48 905-11(18) Sadamori N Mine M Hakariya S Ichiba M Kawachi T
Itoyama T Nakamura H Tomonaga M Hayashi K Leukemia 1995 9 594-7
(19) Schwedler S B Metzger T Schinzel R Wanner C Kidney Int2002 62 301-310
(20) Vlassara H Palace M R J Intern Med 2002 251 87-101(21) Kleinman K S Coburn J W Kidney Int 1989 35 567-75(22) Niwa T Katsuzaki T Miyazaki S Momoi T Akiba T
Miyazaki T Nokura K Hayase F Tatemichi N Takei YKidney Int 1997 51 187-94
(23) Humeny A Kislinger T Becker C M Pischetsrieder M J AgricFood Chem 2002 50 2153-2160
(24) Ogawa Y Tanaka M Inoue K Yamaguchi K Chijiiwa KMizumoto K Tsutsu N Nakamura Y Cancer 2002 94 2344-
2349
(25) Wakasugi H Funakoshi A Iguchi H Int J Clin Oncol 20016 50-4
(26) Ingenbleek Y Young V Annu Rev Nutr 1994 14 495-533(27) Schreiber G Richardson S J Comp Biochem Physiol B
Biochem Mol Biol 1997 116 137-60(28) Connors L H Richardson A M Theberge R Costello C E
Amyloid 2000 7 54-69(29) Damas A M Saraiva M J J Struct Biol 2000 130 290-9(30) Mullins R F Russell S R Anderson D H Hageman G S
Faseb J 2000 14 835-46(31) Plante-Bordeneuve V Said G Curr Opin Neurol 2000 13 569-
73(32) Benson M D Uemichi T Amyloid-Int J Exp Clin Invest 1996
3 44-56(33) Terazaki H Ando Y Suhr O Ohlsson P I Obayashi K
Yamashita T Yoshimatsu S Suga M Uchino M Ando MBiochem Biophys Res Commun 1998 249 26-30
(34) Jacobsson B Lignelid H Bergerheim U S Histopathology 199526 559-64
(35) Woitas R P Stoffel-Wagner B Poege U Schiedermaier PSpengler U Sauerbruch T Clin Chem 2001 47 2179-80
(36) Grubb A O Adv Clin Chem 2000 35 63-99(37) Olafsson I Grubb A Amyloid 2000 7 70-9(38) Dierynck I Bernard A Roels H De Ley M Mult Scler 1996
1 385-7(39) Singh G Katyal S L Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997 17
141-3(40) Hermans C Knoops B Wiedig M Arsalane K Toubeau G
Falmagne P Bernard A Eur Respir J 1999 13 1014-
21(41) Broeckaert F Clippe A Knoops B Hermans C Bernard A Annu N Y Acad Sci 2000 923 68-77
(42) Bernard A M Thielemans N O Lauwerys R R Kidney IntSuppl 1994 47 S34-7
(43) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Shibuya Y Morita YHirasawa M Okutani R Kawai T Abe S Eur Respir J 199710 1108-1114
(44) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Sugaya F Hirasawa M Yamada T Kawai T Abe S Lung 1999 177 45-52
(45) Maes M Bosmans E Ranjan R Vandoolaeghe E MeltzerH Y De Ley M Berghmans R Stans G Desnyder RSchizophr Res 1996 21 39-50
(46) Kanai M Raz A Goodman D S J Clin Invest 1968 47 2025-
44(47) Naylor H M Newcomer M E Biochem 1999 38 2647-53(48) Jaconi S Saurat J H Siegenthaler G Eur J Endocrinol 1996
134 576-82(49) Putnam F In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and
Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Academic Press New York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 58-131
(50) Peters J R T In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Acedemic Press New
York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 133-181(51) Fogh-Andersen N Bjerrum P J Siggaard-Andersen O Clin
Chem 1993 39 48-52(52) Aisen P Wessling-Resnick M Leibold E A Curr Opin Chem
Biol 1999 3 200-6(53) Hong C Y Chia K S J Diabetes Complications 1998 12 43-
60(54) Norden A G Lapsley M Lee P J Pusey C D Scheinman S
J Tam F W Thakker R V Unwin R J Wrong O Kidney Int2001 60 1885-92
(55) Raj P A Dentino A R FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002 206 9 -18(56) Ganz T J Infect Dis 2001 183 Suppl 1 S41-2(57) Befus A D Mowat C Gilchrist M Hu J Solomon S
Bateman A J Immunol 1999 163 947-53(58) Murphy C J Foster B A Mannis M J Selsted M E Reid T
W J Cell Physiol 1993 155 408-13(59) Muller C A Markovic-Lipkovski J Klatt T Gamper J Schwarz
G Beck H Deeg M Kalbacher H Widmann S Wessels JT Becker V Muller G A Flad T Am J Pathol 2002 160 1311-24
(60) Mukae H Iiboshi H Nakazato M Hiratsuka T TokojimaM Abe K Ashitani J Kadota J Matsukura S Kohno SThorax 2002 57 623-8
(61) Thomas N J Carcillo J A Doughty L A Sasser H Heine RP Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002 21 34-8
PR025574C
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 197
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 47
tubular reabsorption35 but have been used as a reliable
measure of proximal tubular reabsorption which has been
linked to renal failure36 Moreover hereditary cerebral hemor-
rhage with amyloidosis (HCHWA) an autosomal dominant
disorder prevalent in Icelandic Dutch and Finish populations
is the result of a CYSC Leu68f Gln variant37 This variant of
CYSC results in amyloid deposits of the walls of cerebral
arteries A number of carcinoma cell lines have also been
reported to secrete CYSC leading to investigations of its role
as a possible tumor marker CYSC also has several PTMassociated with it most notable is the hydroxylation of a Pro
residue at position 336 which results in a mass shift of the wt-
CYSC protein by sim+16 Da
The results of the anti-CYSC MSIA analyses are shown in
Figure 4 in which very similar protein profiles are observed
between all subjects The mass spectrometric analysis was able
to sufficiently resolve the wt- (13 344 Da) and the hydroxylated
form (13 360 Da) of CYSC m ∆m ) sim1000 Varied amounts of
hydroxylation are seen between each individual Multiple
N-terminally truncated forms of CYSC are also present most
notable are the S- (13 256 Da) and SSP- (13 072 Da) Hy-
droxylation still occurs in the S- variant (13 272 Da) but is
lost with the cleavage of the P- at position 3 Further truncated
forms of CYSC are observed in Traces D and E in which
SSPGKPPR- (12 536 Da) SSPGKPPRL- (12 423 Da) and SSPGK-
PPRLV - (12 324 Da) are also present The degradation of CYSC
has been reported from a significant portion of native urine
samples to date36 but this CYSC profiling clearly shows that
this catabolic process is conserved a N-terminal proteolytic
process
Urine Protein 1 UP1 also known as Clara cell protein CC10
or uteroglobin is a biomarker for a variety of pulmonary
ailments and urinary tract dysfunctions UP1 is a small protein
MW ) 7909 that is primarily secreted by Clara cells in the
bronchi alveolar lining in mammalian lung tissue is an anti-
inflammatory agent38 but to date its physiological role is stilllargely unclear The native state of UP1 is a covalently associ-
ated homodimer which results from the disulfide cross bridg-
ing between two UP1 monomers39 When damage occurs to
the respiratory tract plasma and urine UP1 levels increase due
to increased bronchioalveolar permeability and the overloading
of the tubular reabsorption process respectively4041 Moreover
increased UP1 concentration in urine alone basal levels 5-10
microgL41 is often an indication of proximal tubular dysfunction42
whereas decreased UP1 plasma levels have been found in
smokers43 asthmatics44 and schizophrenics45
Figure 5 shows the results of the qualitative urinary UP1
MSIA analysis Dimerized UP1 with MW ) 15 819 is present in
all five traces Although multiple charging of UP1 during the
MALDI process is unable to directly differentiate betweenpotential UP1 monomers and the +2 state of the UP1 dimer
conjugated monomers are readily identifiable Because wt-UP1
monomer would have exposed free cysteine groups some sort
of chemical modification through these reactive sulfhydryls
would be expected as seen in TTR Closer examination in the
Figure 5 inlets shows that both Traces A and B contain UP1
monomer with varied amounts of glutathion conjugate (∆m )
+305 Da) associated Although being virtually undetectable in
Traces C-E this is the first reported incidence of UP1
monomer being detected These results suggest that the
individualsrsquo results shown in Traces A and B have more
glutathion andor UP1 monomer present in their systems
Whether this observation is associated with health state or
significant to disease has yet to be determined
Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) RBP was the fifth urine
protein target A member of the lipocalin family RBP has a
plasma concentration level of sim50 mgL and serves the role of
the major carrier of retinol (vitamin A) from the liver to
peripheral tissues46 With a molecular weight of 21 065 RBP is
believed to escape glomerular filtration by associating with the
homotetramer of transthyretin in its holo- (retinol bound)
form47 RBP has been previously reported to exist in two post-
translationally truncated versions one missing the C-terminal
Leucine (RBP-(Leu)) and the second missing two C-terminal
leucines (RBP-(Leu-Leu)) which are believed to be nonfunc-
Figure 4 Results of urinary CYSC MSIA analysis Both the wild-
type and hydroxylated (∆m ) +16Da) forms of CYSC are present
in all five traces Varied amounts of hydroxylated CYSC are seen
in each individual as well as multiple truncated forms of theprotein These truncations include the systematic N-terminal
cleavage of S- SSP- and SSPG- Extensive cleavage of CYSC
with the loss of SSPGKPPR- SSPGKPPRL- and SSPGKPPRLV-
are only seen in Traces D and E
Figure 5 Mass spectrometric results of urinary UP1 MSIA
Dimerized UP1 (MW ) 15 819) is seen in all five traces but Traces
A and B both contain large proportions of UP1 monomer
conjugated to glutathion (∆m ) +305 Da)
research articles Kiernan et al
194 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 57
tional variants of RBP due to their lower binding affinities to
the transthyretin complex48
The results of the urinary RBP analysis are shown in Figure
6 Conserved protein profiles are seen in Traces A -D with wt-
RBP along with -L -LL -RNLL and -RSERNLL C-terminally
truncated variants The source and function of these variants
are still unknown but have been determined to be the result
of some unreported enzymatic process that occurs after the
RBP is filtered from the blood14 Interestingly the individual
with pancreatic cancer in Figure 6-Trace E displays an altered
RBP profile Most notable is the marked relative decrease in
the amount of wt-RBP present Similar results were reported
with the analysis of urinary RBP of a 94-year old woman with
renal failure stemming from chronic diabetes mellitus in which
wt-RBP was completely absent from the RBP protein expression
profile14
Albumin (ALB) ALB the sixth urine protein target is the
best studied of all plasma proteins49 At sim663 kDa ALB is
considerably larger than any of the previously discussed protein
targets As a multipurpose house-keeping protein ALB serves
a multitude of functions including the binding and transport
of many metallic organic and biochemical compounds anti-
oxidant effects as well as plasma buffering5051
Figure 7 shows the results of the urinary ALB MSIA with the
+1 and the +2 states of ALB are present in all traces Inter-
individual results are all very similar as shown in Figure 7 inlet
except for Trace E in which extensive peak broadening is
observed Since albumin participates in the transport of so
many biological inorganic and pharmacological compounds
adduct formation with one or many of these compounds is
possible Albumin is also known to undergo glycation like 2m
hence the observed peak broadening may be the result of the
formation of an ALB-AGErsquos
Transferrin (TRFE) TRFE the seventh protein target is a
large globular glycoprotein (MW ) 796 kDa) used in the
transport of dietary iron in human plasma52 TRFE readily
crosses the glomerular membrane despite its large size due
to its strong cationic nature53 resulting in urine levels lt019
mgL54 With two N-linked glycosylation sites the heterogeneity
within the sim44 kDa of associated glycan can greatly vary
Figure 8 displays the results of the anti-TRFE MSIA analysis
Strong homology is seen in the results in all five Traces This
homology in TRFE shows that chronic alcoholizm and carbo-
hydrate deficient glycoprotein syndromes (CDGSI or II) were
not present in any of the participants of this study Only Traces
B and E have detectable amounts of TRFE in the +2 state
whereas Trace A does exhibit some tailing in the TRFE signal
Whether these minute differences seen in the TRFE profiles
are related to any disease state or from genetic modificationhas yet to be determined
Human Neutrophil Defensin Peptides (HNP) HNP also
known as the R -defensins was the final urine target in this
study HNP are a family of cysteine-rich cationic peptides 29-
42 amino acids in length secreted from neutrophils The three
most common human neutrophil defensin peptides are HNP-1
(MW ) 3443) HNP-2 (MW ) 3372) and HNP-3 (MW ) 3487)
which are found in plasma urine saliva and sputum5556 These
peptides have demonstrated remarkable antibacterial antifun-
gal and antiviral activities thus suggesting that HNP plays as
strong role innate immunity55
Figure 6 MSIA results of RBP analysis Conserved C-terminal
cleavage pattern is seen in TracesA-D with theloss of -L -LL
-RNLL and -RSERNLL Trace E displays an abnormal RBP
profile due to the noticeable decrease in the amount of wt-RBP
present compared to the truncated forms
Figure 7 Comparison of ALB MSIA analysis ALB +1 and +2
states were detected in all five samples Even though all traces
were acquired using the same instrument settings Trace E
exhibits significant peak broadening of the ALB signal shown
in trace insets as compared to the other ALB signals in the other
traces
Figure 8 Results of TRFE MSIA analysis TRFE (MW ) 796kDa)
was detected in all five samples Only very minor differences
were observed
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 195
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 67
Previous studies into the roles of HNP in various systemic
responses have shown that they partake in large number of
responses including pro-inflammation with histamine release57
as well as cell proliferation and mitogenic effects58 Because of
this last effect more recent studies have suggested a correlation
between HNP and certain cancers59 Other studies have shown
that HNP may also serve as a marker for certain inflammatory
disease states and sepsis6061
Because these peptides are highly cationic immuno-affinity
retrieval is not required Cation exchange MSIA ionically retains
sufficient amounts of HNP to allow for mass spectrometric
detection The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 9 in
which all three major HNP species were detected in all five
samples as shown by the triple peaks Intra-sample concentra-
tion of each HNP species varies from each sample Traces C
and E show that these individuals had more HNP-2 relative to
the other two HNP forms than the other individuals involved
in this study Whether the HNP species ratios are linked to
disease states or are subject to diurnal variation has yet to be
determined
The results of all 40 analyses were summarized for compari-
son in Table 1 which describes structural variations observed
in the target proteins Interestingly the individual diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer showed the most protein variation
compared to the other samples The presence of glycated 2m
and the decrease in wt-RBP were most prominent of all the
differences Similar types of variations have been previously
described from individuals with diabetes mellitus andor ure-
mia but neither of these conditions had been previously
diagnosed in this individual Moreover broadening of this
individualrsquos ALB signal was also observed and may be associ-
ated to albuminrsquos function in bio- and organic-molecule
transport whereas other differences included the increase
truncation of CYSC and altered ratios of HNP-1 and -2 were
seen but not isolated to this individual The analysis of TTR
showed that one individual had a heterozygous point mutation
demonstrating the utility of MSIA in the identification of genetic
variation at the protein level The application of MSIA was ableto also identify monomeric forms of UP1 modified with
glutathion in two individuals In total approximately one-
quarter of the analyses provided variant results from the wild-
type
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that mass spectrometric immu-
noassay is a powerful analytical technique in the study of intact
urinary proteins MSIA allows for the rapid retrieval of specific
protein targets which permits concise identification of each
target species to be achieved Unlike indirect detection as used
in ELISAs mass spectrometry is able to discriminate between
variant forms of a protein target that are present making
identification of all species possible Moreover MSIA is an
analytical technique that allows for comparative protein profil-
ing to look for differences between individuals in specific
protein targets Many of these differences are subtle and could
not be readily distinguished without mass spectrometric detec-
tion As shown here a small study with 40 data points produced
almost a dozen observable differences between 5 individuals
The analysis of 8 protein targets detected 29 different observed
forms of these proteins making mass spectrometry integral for
protein phenotyping The observation of such variation within
such a small study population necessitates the need for larger
urine protein population studies in order to correlate such
findings to possible disease states
Acknowledgment This publication was supported in
part by Grant No R44 GM56603-01 and Contract No N43-DK-
1-2470 from the National Institutes of Health Its contents are
solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official views of the National Institute of Health
References
(1) Burmeister R Boe I M Nykjaer A Jacobsen C Moestrup SK Verroust P Christensen E I Lund J Willnow T E J BiolChem 2001 276 13 295-13 301
(2) Tomlinson P A Dalton R N Turner C Chantler C ClinChim Acta 1990 192 99-106
Table 1 Summary of Protein Profile of All Eight Assays Run on All Five-Study Subjectsa
2m TTR CYTC UP1 RBP ALB TRFE HNP
sample A o o o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o tailing o
sample B o pointmutation
o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o o o
sample C o o o o o o o altered
ratiossample D o o extended
truncations
o o o o o
sample E glycation o extendedtruncations
o decreased wt-RBP
peak broadening
o alteredratios
Figure 9 Mass spectrometric results of HNP analysis Signals
from HNP-1 (MW ) 3443) -2(MW ) 3372) and -3(MW ) 3487)
were detected in all samples Differences in relative amounts of
HNP-1 to HNP-2 are observed between each sample
research articles Kiernan et al
196 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 77
(3) Hansen H P Hovind P Jensen B R Parving H H Kidney Int 2002 61 163-8
(4) Schrader M Schulz-Knappe P Trends Biotechnol 2001 19 S55-60
(5) Yates J R III J Mass Spectrom 1998 33 1-19(6) Neubauer G King A Rappsilber J Calvio C Watson M Ajuh
P Sleeman J Lamond A Mann M Nat Genet 1998 20 46-
50(7) Hampel D J Sansome C Sha M Brodsky S Lawson W E
Goligorsky M S J Am Soc Nephrol 2001 12 1026-35(8) Nelson R W Krone J R Bieber A L Williams P Anal Chem
1995 67 1153-1158
(9) Kiernan U A Doctoral Dissertation Arizona State University2002
(10) Niederkofler E E Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D KiernanU A Williams P Nelson R W Anal Chem 2001 73 3294-
3299(11) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D Niederkof-
ler E E Williams P Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2002 30149-56
(12) Kiernan U A Nedelkov D Tubbs K A Niederkofler E ENelson R W Am Biotech Lab 2002 20 26-28
(13) Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2001289 26-35
(14) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Niederkofler E ENelson R W Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002 297 401
(15) Schardijn G H Statius van Eps L W Kidney Int 1987 32 635-
41(16) Lifson A R Hessol N A Buchbinder S P OrsquoMalley P M
Barnhart L Segal M Katz M H Holmberg S D Lancet 1992
339 1436-40(17) Walters M T Stevenson F K Goswami R Smith J L Cawley
M I Ann Rheum Dis 1989 48 905-11(18) Sadamori N Mine M Hakariya S Ichiba M Kawachi T
Itoyama T Nakamura H Tomonaga M Hayashi K Leukemia 1995 9 594-7
(19) Schwedler S B Metzger T Schinzel R Wanner C Kidney Int2002 62 301-310
(20) Vlassara H Palace M R J Intern Med 2002 251 87-101(21) Kleinman K S Coburn J W Kidney Int 1989 35 567-75(22) Niwa T Katsuzaki T Miyazaki S Momoi T Akiba T
Miyazaki T Nokura K Hayase F Tatemichi N Takei YKidney Int 1997 51 187-94
(23) Humeny A Kislinger T Becker C M Pischetsrieder M J AgricFood Chem 2002 50 2153-2160
(24) Ogawa Y Tanaka M Inoue K Yamaguchi K Chijiiwa KMizumoto K Tsutsu N Nakamura Y Cancer 2002 94 2344-
2349
(25) Wakasugi H Funakoshi A Iguchi H Int J Clin Oncol 20016 50-4
(26) Ingenbleek Y Young V Annu Rev Nutr 1994 14 495-533(27) Schreiber G Richardson S J Comp Biochem Physiol B
Biochem Mol Biol 1997 116 137-60(28) Connors L H Richardson A M Theberge R Costello C E
Amyloid 2000 7 54-69(29) Damas A M Saraiva M J J Struct Biol 2000 130 290-9(30) Mullins R F Russell S R Anderson D H Hageman G S
Faseb J 2000 14 835-46(31) Plante-Bordeneuve V Said G Curr Opin Neurol 2000 13 569-
73(32) Benson M D Uemichi T Amyloid-Int J Exp Clin Invest 1996
3 44-56(33) Terazaki H Ando Y Suhr O Ohlsson P I Obayashi K
Yamashita T Yoshimatsu S Suga M Uchino M Ando MBiochem Biophys Res Commun 1998 249 26-30
(34) Jacobsson B Lignelid H Bergerheim U S Histopathology 199526 559-64
(35) Woitas R P Stoffel-Wagner B Poege U Schiedermaier PSpengler U Sauerbruch T Clin Chem 2001 47 2179-80
(36) Grubb A O Adv Clin Chem 2000 35 63-99(37) Olafsson I Grubb A Amyloid 2000 7 70-9(38) Dierynck I Bernard A Roels H De Ley M Mult Scler 1996
1 385-7(39) Singh G Katyal S L Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997 17
141-3(40) Hermans C Knoops B Wiedig M Arsalane K Toubeau G
Falmagne P Bernard A Eur Respir J 1999 13 1014-
21(41) Broeckaert F Clippe A Knoops B Hermans C Bernard A Annu N Y Acad Sci 2000 923 68-77
(42) Bernard A M Thielemans N O Lauwerys R R Kidney IntSuppl 1994 47 S34-7
(43) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Shibuya Y Morita YHirasawa M Okutani R Kawai T Abe S Eur Respir J 199710 1108-1114
(44) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Sugaya F Hirasawa M Yamada T Kawai T Abe S Lung 1999 177 45-52
(45) Maes M Bosmans E Ranjan R Vandoolaeghe E MeltzerH Y De Ley M Berghmans R Stans G Desnyder RSchizophr Res 1996 21 39-50
(46) Kanai M Raz A Goodman D S J Clin Invest 1968 47 2025-
44(47) Naylor H M Newcomer M E Biochem 1999 38 2647-53(48) Jaconi S Saurat J H Siegenthaler G Eur J Endocrinol 1996
134 576-82(49) Putnam F In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and
Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Academic Press New York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 58-131
(50) Peters J R T In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Acedemic Press New
York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 133-181(51) Fogh-Andersen N Bjerrum P J Siggaard-Andersen O Clin
Chem 1993 39 48-52(52) Aisen P Wessling-Resnick M Leibold E A Curr Opin Chem
Biol 1999 3 200-6(53) Hong C Y Chia K S J Diabetes Complications 1998 12 43-
60(54) Norden A G Lapsley M Lee P J Pusey C D Scheinman S
J Tam F W Thakker R V Unwin R J Wrong O Kidney Int2001 60 1885-92
(55) Raj P A Dentino A R FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002 206 9 -18(56) Ganz T J Infect Dis 2001 183 Suppl 1 S41-2(57) Befus A D Mowat C Gilchrist M Hu J Solomon S
Bateman A J Immunol 1999 163 947-53(58) Murphy C J Foster B A Mannis M J Selsted M E Reid T
W J Cell Physiol 1993 155 408-13(59) Muller C A Markovic-Lipkovski J Klatt T Gamper J Schwarz
G Beck H Deeg M Kalbacher H Widmann S Wessels JT Becker V Muller G A Flad T Am J Pathol 2002 160 1311-24
(60) Mukae H Iiboshi H Nakazato M Hiratsuka T TokojimaM Abe K Ashitani J Kadota J Matsukura S Kohno SThorax 2002 57 623-8
(61) Thomas N J Carcillo J A Doughty L A Sasser H Heine RP Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002 21 34-8
PR025574C
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 197
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 57
tional variants of RBP due to their lower binding affinities to
the transthyretin complex48
The results of the urinary RBP analysis are shown in Figure
6 Conserved protein profiles are seen in Traces A -D with wt-
RBP along with -L -LL -RNLL and -RSERNLL C-terminally
truncated variants The source and function of these variants
are still unknown but have been determined to be the result
of some unreported enzymatic process that occurs after the
RBP is filtered from the blood14 Interestingly the individual
with pancreatic cancer in Figure 6-Trace E displays an altered
RBP profile Most notable is the marked relative decrease in
the amount of wt-RBP present Similar results were reported
with the analysis of urinary RBP of a 94-year old woman with
renal failure stemming from chronic diabetes mellitus in which
wt-RBP was completely absent from the RBP protein expression
profile14
Albumin (ALB) ALB the sixth urine protein target is the
best studied of all plasma proteins49 At sim663 kDa ALB is
considerably larger than any of the previously discussed protein
targets As a multipurpose house-keeping protein ALB serves
a multitude of functions including the binding and transport
of many metallic organic and biochemical compounds anti-
oxidant effects as well as plasma buffering5051
Figure 7 shows the results of the urinary ALB MSIA with the
+1 and the +2 states of ALB are present in all traces Inter-
individual results are all very similar as shown in Figure 7 inlet
except for Trace E in which extensive peak broadening is
observed Since albumin participates in the transport of so
many biological inorganic and pharmacological compounds
adduct formation with one or many of these compounds is
possible Albumin is also known to undergo glycation like 2m
hence the observed peak broadening may be the result of the
formation of an ALB-AGErsquos
Transferrin (TRFE) TRFE the seventh protein target is a
large globular glycoprotein (MW ) 796 kDa) used in the
transport of dietary iron in human plasma52 TRFE readily
crosses the glomerular membrane despite its large size due
to its strong cationic nature53 resulting in urine levels lt019
mgL54 With two N-linked glycosylation sites the heterogeneity
within the sim44 kDa of associated glycan can greatly vary
Figure 8 displays the results of the anti-TRFE MSIA analysis
Strong homology is seen in the results in all five Traces This
homology in TRFE shows that chronic alcoholizm and carbo-
hydrate deficient glycoprotein syndromes (CDGSI or II) were
not present in any of the participants of this study Only Traces
B and E have detectable amounts of TRFE in the +2 state
whereas Trace A does exhibit some tailing in the TRFE signal
Whether these minute differences seen in the TRFE profiles
are related to any disease state or from genetic modificationhas yet to be determined
Human Neutrophil Defensin Peptides (HNP) HNP also
known as the R -defensins was the final urine target in this
study HNP are a family of cysteine-rich cationic peptides 29-
42 amino acids in length secreted from neutrophils The three
most common human neutrophil defensin peptides are HNP-1
(MW ) 3443) HNP-2 (MW ) 3372) and HNP-3 (MW ) 3487)
which are found in plasma urine saliva and sputum5556 These
peptides have demonstrated remarkable antibacterial antifun-
gal and antiviral activities thus suggesting that HNP plays as
strong role innate immunity55
Figure 6 MSIA results of RBP analysis Conserved C-terminal
cleavage pattern is seen in TracesA-D with theloss of -L -LL
-RNLL and -RSERNLL Trace E displays an abnormal RBP
profile due to the noticeable decrease in the amount of wt-RBP
present compared to the truncated forms
Figure 7 Comparison of ALB MSIA analysis ALB +1 and +2
states were detected in all five samples Even though all traces
were acquired using the same instrument settings Trace E
exhibits significant peak broadening of the ALB signal shown
in trace insets as compared to the other ALB signals in the other
traces
Figure 8 Results of TRFE MSIA analysis TRFE (MW ) 796kDa)
was detected in all five samples Only very minor differences
were observed
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 195
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 67
Previous studies into the roles of HNP in various systemic
responses have shown that they partake in large number of
responses including pro-inflammation with histamine release57
as well as cell proliferation and mitogenic effects58 Because of
this last effect more recent studies have suggested a correlation
between HNP and certain cancers59 Other studies have shown
that HNP may also serve as a marker for certain inflammatory
disease states and sepsis6061
Because these peptides are highly cationic immuno-affinity
retrieval is not required Cation exchange MSIA ionically retains
sufficient amounts of HNP to allow for mass spectrometric
detection The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 9 in
which all three major HNP species were detected in all five
samples as shown by the triple peaks Intra-sample concentra-
tion of each HNP species varies from each sample Traces C
and E show that these individuals had more HNP-2 relative to
the other two HNP forms than the other individuals involved
in this study Whether the HNP species ratios are linked to
disease states or are subject to diurnal variation has yet to be
determined
The results of all 40 analyses were summarized for compari-
son in Table 1 which describes structural variations observed
in the target proteins Interestingly the individual diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer showed the most protein variation
compared to the other samples The presence of glycated 2m
and the decrease in wt-RBP were most prominent of all the
differences Similar types of variations have been previously
described from individuals with diabetes mellitus andor ure-
mia but neither of these conditions had been previously
diagnosed in this individual Moreover broadening of this
individualrsquos ALB signal was also observed and may be associ-
ated to albuminrsquos function in bio- and organic-molecule
transport whereas other differences included the increase
truncation of CYSC and altered ratios of HNP-1 and -2 were
seen but not isolated to this individual The analysis of TTR
showed that one individual had a heterozygous point mutation
demonstrating the utility of MSIA in the identification of genetic
variation at the protein level The application of MSIA was ableto also identify monomeric forms of UP1 modified with
glutathion in two individuals In total approximately one-
quarter of the analyses provided variant results from the wild-
type
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that mass spectrometric immu-
noassay is a powerful analytical technique in the study of intact
urinary proteins MSIA allows for the rapid retrieval of specific
protein targets which permits concise identification of each
target species to be achieved Unlike indirect detection as used
in ELISAs mass spectrometry is able to discriminate between
variant forms of a protein target that are present making
identification of all species possible Moreover MSIA is an
analytical technique that allows for comparative protein profil-
ing to look for differences between individuals in specific
protein targets Many of these differences are subtle and could
not be readily distinguished without mass spectrometric detec-
tion As shown here a small study with 40 data points produced
almost a dozen observable differences between 5 individuals
The analysis of 8 protein targets detected 29 different observed
forms of these proteins making mass spectrometry integral for
protein phenotyping The observation of such variation within
such a small study population necessitates the need for larger
urine protein population studies in order to correlate such
findings to possible disease states
Acknowledgment This publication was supported in
part by Grant No R44 GM56603-01 and Contract No N43-DK-
1-2470 from the National Institutes of Health Its contents are
solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official views of the National Institute of Health
References
(1) Burmeister R Boe I M Nykjaer A Jacobsen C Moestrup SK Verroust P Christensen E I Lund J Willnow T E J BiolChem 2001 276 13 295-13 301
(2) Tomlinson P A Dalton R N Turner C Chantler C ClinChim Acta 1990 192 99-106
Table 1 Summary of Protein Profile of All Eight Assays Run on All Five-Study Subjectsa
2m TTR CYTC UP1 RBP ALB TRFE HNP
sample A o o o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o tailing o
sample B o pointmutation
o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o o o
sample C o o o o o o o altered
ratiossample D o o extended
truncations
o o o o o
sample E glycation o extendedtruncations
o decreased wt-RBP
peak broadening
o alteredratios
Figure 9 Mass spectrometric results of HNP analysis Signals
from HNP-1 (MW ) 3443) -2(MW ) 3372) and -3(MW ) 3487)
were detected in all samples Differences in relative amounts of
HNP-1 to HNP-2 are observed between each sample
research articles Kiernan et al
196 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 77
(3) Hansen H P Hovind P Jensen B R Parving H H Kidney Int 2002 61 163-8
(4) Schrader M Schulz-Knappe P Trends Biotechnol 2001 19 S55-60
(5) Yates J R III J Mass Spectrom 1998 33 1-19(6) Neubauer G King A Rappsilber J Calvio C Watson M Ajuh
P Sleeman J Lamond A Mann M Nat Genet 1998 20 46-
50(7) Hampel D J Sansome C Sha M Brodsky S Lawson W E
Goligorsky M S J Am Soc Nephrol 2001 12 1026-35(8) Nelson R W Krone J R Bieber A L Williams P Anal Chem
1995 67 1153-1158
(9) Kiernan U A Doctoral Dissertation Arizona State University2002
(10) Niederkofler E E Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D KiernanU A Williams P Nelson R W Anal Chem 2001 73 3294-
3299(11) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D Niederkof-
ler E E Williams P Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2002 30149-56
(12) Kiernan U A Nedelkov D Tubbs K A Niederkofler E ENelson R W Am Biotech Lab 2002 20 26-28
(13) Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2001289 26-35
(14) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Niederkofler E ENelson R W Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002 297 401
(15) Schardijn G H Statius van Eps L W Kidney Int 1987 32 635-
41(16) Lifson A R Hessol N A Buchbinder S P OrsquoMalley P M
Barnhart L Segal M Katz M H Holmberg S D Lancet 1992
339 1436-40(17) Walters M T Stevenson F K Goswami R Smith J L Cawley
M I Ann Rheum Dis 1989 48 905-11(18) Sadamori N Mine M Hakariya S Ichiba M Kawachi T
Itoyama T Nakamura H Tomonaga M Hayashi K Leukemia 1995 9 594-7
(19) Schwedler S B Metzger T Schinzel R Wanner C Kidney Int2002 62 301-310
(20) Vlassara H Palace M R J Intern Med 2002 251 87-101(21) Kleinman K S Coburn J W Kidney Int 1989 35 567-75(22) Niwa T Katsuzaki T Miyazaki S Momoi T Akiba T
Miyazaki T Nokura K Hayase F Tatemichi N Takei YKidney Int 1997 51 187-94
(23) Humeny A Kislinger T Becker C M Pischetsrieder M J AgricFood Chem 2002 50 2153-2160
(24) Ogawa Y Tanaka M Inoue K Yamaguchi K Chijiiwa KMizumoto K Tsutsu N Nakamura Y Cancer 2002 94 2344-
2349
(25) Wakasugi H Funakoshi A Iguchi H Int J Clin Oncol 20016 50-4
(26) Ingenbleek Y Young V Annu Rev Nutr 1994 14 495-533(27) Schreiber G Richardson S J Comp Biochem Physiol B
Biochem Mol Biol 1997 116 137-60(28) Connors L H Richardson A M Theberge R Costello C E
Amyloid 2000 7 54-69(29) Damas A M Saraiva M J J Struct Biol 2000 130 290-9(30) Mullins R F Russell S R Anderson D H Hageman G S
Faseb J 2000 14 835-46(31) Plante-Bordeneuve V Said G Curr Opin Neurol 2000 13 569-
73(32) Benson M D Uemichi T Amyloid-Int J Exp Clin Invest 1996
3 44-56(33) Terazaki H Ando Y Suhr O Ohlsson P I Obayashi K
Yamashita T Yoshimatsu S Suga M Uchino M Ando MBiochem Biophys Res Commun 1998 249 26-30
(34) Jacobsson B Lignelid H Bergerheim U S Histopathology 199526 559-64
(35) Woitas R P Stoffel-Wagner B Poege U Schiedermaier PSpengler U Sauerbruch T Clin Chem 2001 47 2179-80
(36) Grubb A O Adv Clin Chem 2000 35 63-99(37) Olafsson I Grubb A Amyloid 2000 7 70-9(38) Dierynck I Bernard A Roels H De Ley M Mult Scler 1996
1 385-7(39) Singh G Katyal S L Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997 17
141-3(40) Hermans C Knoops B Wiedig M Arsalane K Toubeau G
Falmagne P Bernard A Eur Respir J 1999 13 1014-
21(41) Broeckaert F Clippe A Knoops B Hermans C Bernard A Annu N Y Acad Sci 2000 923 68-77
(42) Bernard A M Thielemans N O Lauwerys R R Kidney IntSuppl 1994 47 S34-7
(43) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Shibuya Y Morita YHirasawa M Okutani R Kawai T Abe S Eur Respir J 199710 1108-1114
(44) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Sugaya F Hirasawa M Yamada T Kawai T Abe S Lung 1999 177 45-52
(45) Maes M Bosmans E Ranjan R Vandoolaeghe E MeltzerH Y De Ley M Berghmans R Stans G Desnyder RSchizophr Res 1996 21 39-50
(46) Kanai M Raz A Goodman D S J Clin Invest 1968 47 2025-
44(47) Naylor H M Newcomer M E Biochem 1999 38 2647-53(48) Jaconi S Saurat J H Siegenthaler G Eur J Endocrinol 1996
134 576-82(49) Putnam F In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and
Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Academic Press New York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 58-131
(50) Peters J R T In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Acedemic Press New
York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 133-181(51) Fogh-Andersen N Bjerrum P J Siggaard-Andersen O Clin
Chem 1993 39 48-52(52) Aisen P Wessling-Resnick M Leibold E A Curr Opin Chem
Biol 1999 3 200-6(53) Hong C Y Chia K S J Diabetes Complications 1998 12 43-
60(54) Norden A G Lapsley M Lee P J Pusey C D Scheinman S
J Tam F W Thakker R V Unwin R J Wrong O Kidney Int2001 60 1885-92
(55) Raj P A Dentino A R FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002 206 9 -18(56) Ganz T J Infect Dis 2001 183 Suppl 1 S41-2(57) Befus A D Mowat C Gilchrist M Hu J Solomon S
Bateman A J Immunol 1999 163 947-53(58) Murphy C J Foster B A Mannis M J Selsted M E Reid T
W J Cell Physiol 1993 155 408-13(59) Muller C A Markovic-Lipkovski J Klatt T Gamper J Schwarz
G Beck H Deeg M Kalbacher H Widmann S Wessels JT Becker V Muller G A Flad T Am J Pathol 2002 160 1311-24
(60) Mukae H Iiboshi H Nakazato M Hiratsuka T TokojimaM Abe K Ashitani J Kadota J Matsukura S Kohno SThorax 2002 57 623-8
(61) Thomas N J Carcillo J A Doughty L A Sasser H Heine RP Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002 21 34-8
PR025574C
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 197
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 67
Previous studies into the roles of HNP in various systemic
responses have shown that they partake in large number of
responses including pro-inflammation with histamine release57
as well as cell proliferation and mitogenic effects58 Because of
this last effect more recent studies have suggested a correlation
between HNP and certain cancers59 Other studies have shown
that HNP may also serve as a marker for certain inflammatory
disease states and sepsis6061
Because these peptides are highly cationic immuno-affinity
retrieval is not required Cation exchange MSIA ionically retains
sufficient amounts of HNP to allow for mass spectrometric
detection The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 9 in
which all three major HNP species were detected in all five
samples as shown by the triple peaks Intra-sample concentra-
tion of each HNP species varies from each sample Traces C
and E show that these individuals had more HNP-2 relative to
the other two HNP forms than the other individuals involved
in this study Whether the HNP species ratios are linked to
disease states or are subject to diurnal variation has yet to be
determined
The results of all 40 analyses were summarized for compari-
son in Table 1 which describes structural variations observed
in the target proteins Interestingly the individual diagnosed
with pancreatic cancer showed the most protein variation
compared to the other samples The presence of glycated 2m
and the decrease in wt-RBP were most prominent of all the
differences Similar types of variations have been previously
described from individuals with diabetes mellitus andor ure-
mia but neither of these conditions had been previously
diagnosed in this individual Moreover broadening of this
individualrsquos ALB signal was also observed and may be associ-
ated to albuminrsquos function in bio- and organic-molecule
transport whereas other differences included the increase
truncation of CYSC and altered ratios of HNP-1 and -2 were
seen but not isolated to this individual The analysis of TTR
showed that one individual had a heterozygous point mutation
demonstrating the utility of MSIA in the identification of genetic
variation at the protein level The application of MSIA was ableto also identify monomeric forms of UP1 modified with
glutathion in two individuals In total approximately one-
quarter of the analyses provided variant results from the wild-
type
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that mass spectrometric immu-
noassay is a powerful analytical technique in the study of intact
urinary proteins MSIA allows for the rapid retrieval of specific
protein targets which permits concise identification of each
target species to be achieved Unlike indirect detection as used
in ELISAs mass spectrometry is able to discriminate between
variant forms of a protein target that are present making
identification of all species possible Moreover MSIA is an
analytical technique that allows for comparative protein profil-
ing to look for differences between individuals in specific
protein targets Many of these differences are subtle and could
not be readily distinguished without mass spectrometric detec-
tion As shown here a small study with 40 data points produced
almost a dozen observable differences between 5 individuals
The analysis of 8 protein targets detected 29 different observed
forms of these proteins making mass spectrometry integral for
protein phenotyping The observation of such variation within
such a small study population necessitates the need for larger
urine protein population studies in order to correlate such
findings to possible disease states
Acknowledgment This publication was supported in
part by Grant No R44 GM56603-01 and Contract No N43-DK-
1-2470 from the National Institutes of Health Its contents are
solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official views of the National Institute of Health
References
(1) Burmeister R Boe I M Nykjaer A Jacobsen C Moestrup SK Verroust P Christensen E I Lund J Willnow T E J BiolChem 2001 276 13 295-13 301
(2) Tomlinson P A Dalton R N Turner C Chantler C ClinChim Acta 1990 192 99-106
Table 1 Summary of Protein Profile of All Eight Assays Run on All Five-Study Subjectsa
2m TTR CYTC UP1 RBP ALB TRFE HNP
sample A o o o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o tailing o
sample B o pointmutation
o glutathionconjugated
monomer
o o o o
sample C o o o o o o o altered
ratiossample D o o extended
truncations
o o o o o
sample E glycation o extendedtruncations
o decreased wt-RBP
peak broadening
o alteredratios
Figure 9 Mass spectrometric results of HNP analysis Signals
from HNP-1 (MW ) 3443) -2(MW ) 3372) and -3(MW ) 3487)
were detected in all samples Differences in relative amounts of
HNP-1 to HNP-2 are observed between each sample
research articles Kiernan et al
196 J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 77
(3) Hansen H P Hovind P Jensen B R Parving H H Kidney Int 2002 61 163-8
(4) Schrader M Schulz-Knappe P Trends Biotechnol 2001 19 S55-60
(5) Yates J R III J Mass Spectrom 1998 33 1-19(6) Neubauer G King A Rappsilber J Calvio C Watson M Ajuh
P Sleeman J Lamond A Mann M Nat Genet 1998 20 46-
50(7) Hampel D J Sansome C Sha M Brodsky S Lawson W E
Goligorsky M S J Am Soc Nephrol 2001 12 1026-35(8) Nelson R W Krone J R Bieber A L Williams P Anal Chem
1995 67 1153-1158
(9) Kiernan U A Doctoral Dissertation Arizona State University2002
(10) Niederkofler E E Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D KiernanU A Williams P Nelson R W Anal Chem 2001 73 3294-
3299(11) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D Niederkof-
ler E E Williams P Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2002 30149-56
(12) Kiernan U A Nedelkov D Tubbs K A Niederkofler E ENelson R W Am Biotech Lab 2002 20 26-28
(13) Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2001289 26-35
(14) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Niederkofler E ENelson R W Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002 297 401
(15) Schardijn G H Statius van Eps L W Kidney Int 1987 32 635-
41(16) Lifson A R Hessol N A Buchbinder S P OrsquoMalley P M
Barnhart L Segal M Katz M H Holmberg S D Lancet 1992
339 1436-40(17) Walters M T Stevenson F K Goswami R Smith J L Cawley
M I Ann Rheum Dis 1989 48 905-11(18) Sadamori N Mine M Hakariya S Ichiba M Kawachi T
Itoyama T Nakamura H Tomonaga M Hayashi K Leukemia 1995 9 594-7
(19) Schwedler S B Metzger T Schinzel R Wanner C Kidney Int2002 62 301-310
(20) Vlassara H Palace M R J Intern Med 2002 251 87-101(21) Kleinman K S Coburn J W Kidney Int 1989 35 567-75(22) Niwa T Katsuzaki T Miyazaki S Momoi T Akiba T
Miyazaki T Nokura K Hayase F Tatemichi N Takei YKidney Int 1997 51 187-94
(23) Humeny A Kislinger T Becker C M Pischetsrieder M J AgricFood Chem 2002 50 2153-2160
(24) Ogawa Y Tanaka M Inoue K Yamaguchi K Chijiiwa KMizumoto K Tsutsu N Nakamura Y Cancer 2002 94 2344-
2349
(25) Wakasugi H Funakoshi A Iguchi H Int J Clin Oncol 20016 50-4
(26) Ingenbleek Y Young V Annu Rev Nutr 1994 14 495-533(27) Schreiber G Richardson S J Comp Biochem Physiol B
Biochem Mol Biol 1997 116 137-60(28) Connors L H Richardson A M Theberge R Costello C E
Amyloid 2000 7 54-69(29) Damas A M Saraiva M J J Struct Biol 2000 130 290-9(30) Mullins R F Russell S R Anderson D H Hageman G S
Faseb J 2000 14 835-46(31) Plante-Bordeneuve V Said G Curr Opin Neurol 2000 13 569-
73(32) Benson M D Uemichi T Amyloid-Int J Exp Clin Invest 1996
3 44-56(33) Terazaki H Ando Y Suhr O Ohlsson P I Obayashi K
Yamashita T Yoshimatsu S Suga M Uchino M Ando MBiochem Biophys Res Commun 1998 249 26-30
(34) Jacobsson B Lignelid H Bergerheim U S Histopathology 199526 559-64
(35) Woitas R P Stoffel-Wagner B Poege U Schiedermaier PSpengler U Sauerbruch T Clin Chem 2001 47 2179-80
(36) Grubb A O Adv Clin Chem 2000 35 63-99(37) Olafsson I Grubb A Amyloid 2000 7 70-9(38) Dierynck I Bernard A Roels H De Ley M Mult Scler 1996
1 385-7(39) Singh G Katyal S L Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997 17
141-3(40) Hermans C Knoops B Wiedig M Arsalane K Toubeau G
Falmagne P Bernard A Eur Respir J 1999 13 1014-
21(41) Broeckaert F Clippe A Knoops B Hermans C Bernard A Annu N Y Acad Sci 2000 923 68-77
(42) Bernard A M Thielemans N O Lauwerys R R Kidney IntSuppl 1994 47 S34-7
(43) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Shibuya Y Morita YHirasawa M Okutani R Kawai T Abe S Eur Respir J 199710 1108-1114
(44) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Sugaya F Hirasawa M Yamada T Kawai T Abe S Lung 1999 177 45-52
(45) Maes M Bosmans E Ranjan R Vandoolaeghe E MeltzerH Y De Ley M Berghmans R Stans G Desnyder RSchizophr Res 1996 21 39-50
(46) Kanai M Raz A Goodman D S J Clin Invest 1968 47 2025-
44(47) Naylor H M Newcomer M E Biochem 1999 38 2647-53(48) Jaconi S Saurat J H Siegenthaler G Eur J Endocrinol 1996
134 576-82(49) Putnam F In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and
Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Academic Press New York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 58-131
(50) Peters J R T In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Acedemic Press New
York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 133-181(51) Fogh-Andersen N Bjerrum P J Siggaard-Andersen O Clin
Chem 1993 39 48-52(52) Aisen P Wessling-Resnick M Leibold E A Curr Opin Chem
Biol 1999 3 200-6(53) Hong C Y Chia K S J Diabetes Complications 1998 12 43-
60(54) Norden A G Lapsley M Lee P J Pusey C D Scheinman S
J Tam F W Thakker R V Unwin R J Wrong O Kidney Int2001 60 1885-92
(55) Raj P A Dentino A R FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002 206 9 -18(56) Ganz T J Infect Dis 2001 183 Suppl 1 S41-2(57) Befus A D Mowat C Gilchrist M Hu J Solomon S
Bateman A J Immunol 1999 163 947-53(58) Murphy C J Foster B A Mannis M J Selsted M E Reid T
W J Cell Physiol 1993 155 408-13(59) Muller C A Markovic-Lipkovski J Klatt T Gamper J Schwarz
G Beck H Deeg M Kalbacher H Widmann S Wessels JT Becker V Muller G A Flad T Am J Pathol 2002 160 1311-24
(60) Mukae H Iiboshi H Nakazato M Hiratsuka T TokojimaM Abe K Ashitani J Kadota J Matsukura S Kohno SThorax 2002 57 623-8
(61) Thomas N J Carcillo J A Doughty L A Sasser H Heine RP Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002 21 34-8
PR025574C
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 197
892019 Kiernan et al_2002_Journal of proteome research_Comparative urine phenotypingpdf
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullkiernan-et-al2002journal-of-proteome-researchcomparative-urine-phenotypingpdf 77
(3) Hansen H P Hovind P Jensen B R Parving H H Kidney Int 2002 61 163-8
(4) Schrader M Schulz-Knappe P Trends Biotechnol 2001 19 S55-60
(5) Yates J R III J Mass Spectrom 1998 33 1-19(6) Neubauer G King A Rappsilber J Calvio C Watson M Ajuh
P Sleeman J Lamond A Mann M Nat Genet 1998 20 46-
50(7) Hampel D J Sansome C Sha M Brodsky S Lawson W E
Goligorsky M S J Am Soc Nephrol 2001 12 1026-35(8) Nelson R W Krone J R Bieber A L Williams P Anal Chem
1995 67 1153-1158
(9) Kiernan U A Doctoral Dissertation Arizona State University2002
(10) Niederkofler E E Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D KiernanU A Williams P Nelson R W Anal Chem 2001 73 3294-
3299(11) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Gruber K Nedelkov D Niederkof-
ler E E Williams P Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2002 30149-56
(12) Kiernan U A Nedelkov D Tubbs K A Niederkofler E ENelson R W Am Biotech Lab 2002 20 26-28
(13) Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Nelson R W Anal Biochem 2001289 26-35
(14) Kiernan U A Tubbs K A Nedelkov D Niederkofler E ENelson R W Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002 297 401
(15) Schardijn G H Statius van Eps L W Kidney Int 1987 32 635-
41(16) Lifson A R Hessol N A Buchbinder S P OrsquoMalley P M
Barnhart L Segal M Katz M H Holmberg S D Lancet 1992
339 1436-40(17) Walters M T Stevenson F K Goswami R Smith J L Cawley
M I Ann Rheum Dis 1989 48 905-11(18) Sadamori N Mine M Hakariya S Ichiba M Kawachi T
Itoyama T Nakamura H Tomonaga M Hayashi K Leukemia 1995 9 594-7
(19) Schwedler S B Metzger T Schinzel R Wanner C Kidney Int2002 62 301-310
(20) Vlassara H Palace M R J Intern Med 2002 251 87-101(21) Kleinman K S Coburn J W Kidney Int 1989 35 567-75(22) Niwa T Katsuzaki T Miyazaki S Momoi T Akiba T
Miyazaki T Nokura K Hayase F Tatemichi N Takei YKidney Int 1997 51 187-94
(23) Humeny A Kislinger T Becker C M Pischetsrieder M J AgricFood Chem 2002 50 2153-2160
(24) Ogawa Y Tanaka M Inoue K Yamaguchi K Chijiiwa KMizumoto K Tsutsu N Nakamura Y Cancer 2002 94 2344-
2349
(25) Wakasugi H Funakoshi A Iguchi H Int J Clin Oncol 20016 50-4
(26) Ingenbleek Y Young V Annu Rev Nutr 1994 14 495-533(27) Schreiber G Richardson S J Comp Biochem Physiol B
Biochem Mol Biol 1997 116 137-60(28) Connors L H Richardson A M Theberge R Costello C E
Amyloid 2000 7 54-69(29) Damas A M Saraiva M J J Struct Biol 2000 130 290-9(30) Mullins R F Russell S R Anderson D H Hageman G S
Faseb J 2000 14 835-46(31) Plante-Bordeneuve V Said G Curr Opin Neurol 2000 13 569-
73(32) Benson M D Uemichi T Amyloid-Int J Exp Clin Invest 1996
3 44-56(33) Terazaki H Ando Y Suhr O Ohlsson P I Obayashi K
Yamashita T Yoshimatsu S Suga M Uchino M Ando MBiochem Biophys Res Commun 1998 249 26-30
(34) Jacobsson B Lignelid H Bergerheim U S Histopathology 199526 559-64
(35) Woitas R P Stoffel-Wagner B Poege U Schiedermaier PSpengler U Sauerbruch T Clin Chem 2001 47 2179-80
(36) Grubb A O Adv Clin Chem 2000 35 63-99(37) Olafsson I Grubb A Amyloid 2000 7 70-9(38) Dierynck I Bernard A Roels H De Ley M Mult Scler 1996
1 385-7(39) Singh G Katyal S L Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997 17
141-3(40) Hermans C Knoops B Wiedig M Arsalane K Toubeau G
Falmagne P Bernard A Eur Respir J 1999 13 1014-
21(41) Broeckaert F Clippe A Knoops B Hermans C Bernard A Annu N Y Acad Sci 2000 923 68-77
(42) Bernard A M Thielemans N O Lauwerys R R Kidney IntSuppl 1994 47 S34-7
(43) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Shibuya Y Morita YHirasawa M Okutani R Kawai T Abe S Eur Respir J 199710 1108-1114
(44) Shijubo N Itoh Y Yamaguchi T Sugaya F Hirasawa M Yamada T Kawai T Abe S Lung 1999 177 45-52
(45) Maes M Bosmans E Ranjan R Vandoolaeghe E MeltzerH Y De Ley M Berghmans R Stans G Desnyder RSchizophr Res 1996 21 39-50
(46) Kanai M Raz A Goodman D S J Clin Invest 1968 47 2025-
44(47) Naylor H M Newcomer M E Biochem 1999 38 2647-53(48) Jaconi S Saurat J H Siegenthaler G Eur J Endocrinol 1996
134 576-82(49) Putnam F In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and
Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Academic Press New York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 58-131
(50) Peters J R T In The Plasma Proteins Structure Function and Genetic Control 2nd ed Putnam F Ed Acedemic Press New
York 19 75 Vol 1 pp 133-181(51) Fogh-Andersen N Bjerrum P J Siggaard-Andersen O Clin
Chem 1993 39 48-52(52) Aisen P Wessling-Resnick M Leibold E A Curr Opin Chem
Biol 1999 3 200-6(53) Hong C Y Chia K S J Diabetes Complications 1998 12 43-
60(54) Norden A G Lapsley M Lee P J Pusey C D Scheinman S
J Tam F W Thakker R V Unwin R J Wrong O Kidney Int2001 60 1885-92
(55) Raj P A Dentino A R FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002 206 9 -18(56) Ganz T J Infect Dis 2001 183 Suppl 1 S41-2(57) Befus A D Mowat C Gilchrist M Hu J Solomon S
Bateman A J Immunol 1999 163 947-53(58) Murphy C J Foster B A Mannis M J Selsted M E Reid T
W J Cell Physiol 1993 155 408-13(59) Muller C A Markovic-Lipkovski J Klatt T Gamper J Schwarz
G Beck H Deeg M Kalbacher H Widmann S Wessels JT Becker V Muller G A Flad T Am J Pathol 2002 160 1311-24
(60) Mukae H Iiboshi H Nakazato M Hiratsuka T TokojimaM Abe K Ashitani J Kadota J Matsukura S Kohno SThorax 2002 57 623-8
(61) Thomas N J Carcillo J A Doughty L A Sasser H Heine RP Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002 21 34-8
PR025574C
C om p a r a t i v e U r i n e P r o t ei n P h en o t y pi n g research articles
J ournal of Proteome Research bull Vol 2 No 2 2003 197