ketan parekh 1992 stock scam judgement special court mumbai

Upload: sampath-bulusu

Post on 01-Jun-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    1/245

    1

    BEFORE TH SPCIA CO A BOMBAY

    CONSITED UNDE TH SPECA COUT (TIAL OF OFFENCES

    REAING TO RASAIONS N SECURIES) A 1992

    SECAL CASE NO 3 OF 196

    Cen ueu f nveigon .. Coml

    V/

    Sath Mhn Aced No.

    N auma ....Acce No.2.

    3 B.. Achy Ace No

    4 M P.J Sbbr Accued N..

    5. Hiten P ll Accued N5

    6 SK he Acued N

    7 P Set Acue No7

    8. MK Aho Km ... Acced N.8

    9. Ktn V Pekh Aced No9

    0 Nvcad N Peh ... Acse N10

    V Snv ... Aue No

    M V. P . S. Mhmn, Spal b Petof CBI

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    2/245

    Mr A.Z Mooh dv g Ad o usd No.1.

    M Gh Ku, dv ud N2

    Mrs BA. d (l A), dv r usd No.3.

    Mr P. wd, dv or d No.4.

    Mr. ul Kl dvot r d o.5

    Mr. aih h M M dh Dru Lldr & Cdv or d No6

    Mr Pdhr Mr v Sh & R Rpdvot or usd No7.

    M Mr Ait i

    My Sr Mdhur M&

    Co, dv o N8

    Mr. Mhh J Mr A Chu & Mr Ajt Kdd c 9 d 10

    M D.R do L Aid or csd o.

    OAM: VM. KAADE Jd Sp out

    DAT : 7 Mrh 20 & Aprl, 208

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    3/245

    3

    O DGME:

    n 0/06/1994, a complan cme o be eed e Bank

    Secue d Frud Cel of Cnrl Bureau of Ivegton ide RC.

    No3/BSC/94-BM ude secon 2-B ad w eco 49 42

    477-A of e ndn Pel Cod d econ 13() ad w eco

    3()d) of he Peveo of Corrupo Ac 988 e R i wa

    ed eable omo eceed e ice o e eec

    Cnbak Fcal Sercs Lmed which had Headqur

    a Bagoe ad wch w a wholy owned bsday of C

    B, d ppaed e secoda mak aces was

    aged

    he FIR a durg 9992 S Moh Accused No)

    Mr N Bubmam Accused No.2) were poed a

    Vce ede e Ca Headue a Boe nd M.

    S Mohn dele d N Baaubmam wa loog e

    Fund geme Depe It wa aleed e wa a

    coprcy bewee employee o Ca ad Canak Muual Fud

    d some boe ad wa aeed eween hem e nd

    bogig o Cana ad Caak Muual Fud would be dveed n

    he ccou of he broke ad heee e d mou whch wa

    deed woud eued w e ad o he d pupoe

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    4/245

    4

    e aount of Cna and Canb Mutual Fund wee mapuaed

    Te deta of e sad tnsation wee mentoned te Aer

    e IR odged, acced No. 7 M Se w eed on

    07 /07 /1994 and eed on bai on 09/07 /199 On

    25/03/1996 ote accued were asd and we eleaed on bl.

    Cge-heet was ed as e accsed n cag-eet wa

    leged a te aued comtted n oence puabe unde

    setion 120-B ead wt cton 09 420 77-A of e ndn Pen

    Code and 3(2) ad wth cton 131)d of te evenon o

    Coupon At. Ae te age-seet was led a cage w med

    agait te aused e poeuo exmined 19 wee

    suppot of is se.

    2 e posecuon bie ta a ount of R

    477068200/ w tsmtted e stlment om Cana to

    Canbak Mut und oay oteby o pe of

    ces by bak fo aa e ton ook ace on

    0/10/99 and te ount oved tsacton wa 1729

    oes. e cond acon tk pace on 22/0/1991 and wa

    or e amount f R 12 coe e td traacton took pce on

    6/01/1992 and an amont of 5 r. e fourt

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    5/245

    5

    ctin w inid on 07/02/992 nd w alo o a mount

    ofR 5 os T 5 aon was ated 11/2/1992 d w f

    a amont o croe

    3. Dung ose of uent M. V.G Pradan he eed

    Speca Pubc osto ppeag o beh f e poseco

    tted tat t proeuon id no wsh t pess rges e

    of te sacto dated /2/1992 ad /02/992 i.e aon

    No. ad 5 sce it wa eenly a ason wich w n espect

    f te accused Manubha Mal who hd xped durng he

    peneny of the l

    4 I te case o te psecuion ht s s th rsttson

    s nnd dad 10/10/99 e d to the ne of R 729

    ores wee diveed vor of accused No 9 d 1 and accused

    N. tgh the B of Indi In espect of te seond taction,

    wch ws f aont of R 2 crors, nds we dveed

    vo accd Nos.6 an tou te Bk o Inda and

    repct of th rd ntion dated 6/01/992 te funds to te

    une o R 5 ores wer divrted fvo o aed N.5 hrough

    e Ad ak nd n spct of the our and ft aon, t

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    6/245

    6

    nds were divered favour of ate Mabha Maka.

    5 Te posecto as examed 9 weses i order to etabh

    t ee ds ee dveed om Caa nd eveay these

    ds laded n te ad of ased/broker, wo ied e sae

    ad ereaer moe ame o be refded o Cn ogwith

    ees

    6. I s esseta to brefy se e aios whh voved

    ptua se. t eged by th proseto t S Moa -

    asd No.1 made a e dted 10//99 Cn's boo

    egadg prcae of om Canank Mta Fd for R 79

    oes he tere o de eee C d CB. Een

    the absee of y dea a aon of 729 s was

    red to CBo lO/f91 y f Bgaore. Oit 1;

    ee o e ad o ocher dated0/10/1991

    preped

    CM o sow at e aid o wrgy eeve d t

    t was o pd bak de ose of e t eged that

    reat amot not reded o nn bt B A -

    ed No3 aog wt BV. Srvsa accsed No. seqe dated 10/10/991 of R 899 ores vor o SK Jave

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    7/245

    7

    accued No6 and e ceqe r 830 coes vo of M

    Narbhaam Hakcnd, wc wa wic Ke V. Pek

    and Nvncand N arek e ed No 9 ad repecvely

    we sote Teeer, i mon of R 7.29 core w

    egay paed on o e ad boker wo dd o e y da

    eer w Cn or w CBMF coecon wi te rept o e

    ad amon

    er aeged ha teance of e afored mn

    copiay N Baamm - cced No2 mde n ey daed

    2/0/ n e Cann record egarding pe of "1 NCD"

    for 2 ore om Cnbk M Fd whie Cana dd o

    ave ny c de wi CBM I s aleged a even en U

    amo o 1 oe w aed o anbk M d

    Mmba y Cn Bngore on 22091 On eceip of e

    n n CBMF, oer w pepaed owing d receip of

    R crore a wongy remted" om Cana wh beng pad

    o SK Jver a per Cnna' co and acdngy n

    amon o 2 e ceved n CBMF m a wo any

    dea w paed on o SK Jve cced No6 wo dd o hae

    n deal eer w Cna o w CBMF in conneion w e

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    8/245

    8

    ecept f th a amun

    8 It aleged by te preun at N. Balbmam

    acced N.2 mad an entry dated 6/0/992 n Caa' recd

    egdng purchae f f NCD m Canak u Fnd fr

    n munt R 5 ce g na did nt have ny uch dea

    wt Canbank tal Fund (hereer ed '). It

    eged ftr amn wa reived accued No.4 J

    Subbar ued dc t Caa Bk Tama Lne Banch

    Bmay t edt mn i ig Seme", gh F wa

    n cnected n y wh sad mnt It s leged at er

    amn a edtd i e Caig Sme t wa nred to

    te accunt f Hiten l acued N5 wh did nt ae any

    dea r M rpect f eipt f e ad amn f

    R 5 cre It e petn ta N Balbmam

    accused N.2 mad n entr daed 07/02/992 regardng uca f 4% N fr R 5 e m CBM thgh her w

    n h dl eiter m Cna r CBM n amnt w

    aed t CBM n te a f he aid enty er amt

    ws riv CBF acued N4 sued a ceque ate

    /2/992 in favur f lte anubi anikal tgh e dd nt

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    9/245

    have ay del eihe it Canna or i CBMF

    9. I e psecution ase t simlrly, ccused No.2 N

    Balsbniam made eny dated 1/02/1992 i Ca's reord

    song prhase of 1 NCDs for R 7 ores om M houg

    Cn did not hae deal d amont was ferred

    to M for the prse of NCDs. Wen amont s redited ine aont of M acued No J Sbbrao alongh noer

    Ofe ied ee dted 1/02/992 i vor of Mbha

    ho, agin, did not ve ny deal th Caa o wth

    M. The prosecion case, r h n mont of R

    537782500/ received om s YB. Desa on 31/03/1992 nd

    mont ws rsfed on 31/03/992 by Ca, Mmbi to

    C Bangalore hrogh n IBA whi wa signed by M

    Vop who ws not made n csed n te l t i he

    poseution se t by e of ese ve cio n mont f

    R 47706200/ was uzed by ebrokers and agin remitted ba

    wh nteres The mont of 537782500/ as aferred on

    31/03/992 by Ca, Mmb to Cann, Bnglore. hs

    done by an BA signed by R Venugopal and afte amon ws

    eeved by Cn Banlore, ccsed No.2 N Blbrmanam

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    10/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    11/245

    ecuiy. I howeve pohibe Canna om doing be of

    bng a dene n e Baking Relaon A e Canbak

    ul Fund s a us and i auhozed o mke nvesmens in

    he a alo o lend money nd make advances. aue 15 of

    Deed empowered he uee of he CBF o ) acqie old,

    manage ade and dipose o shaes and debentes & ) boow o

    oew se money w o wtho seie subje o he lms

    a my be decided by te ee A he elea e ccsed No1

    - S ohn wa e Aisn Vice Pesiden nd deale of nna a

    Headqr n Banalor, accse No. - N. Balsbamnm

    he Assisn Vice Pesiden and he dele of a s

    eadu a Bangaloe ased No.3 - BR Achrya ws he

    Gne nge a membe of the Boa of ruees of CBF

    ccused No PJ Subbao he Ain nea aag,

    Canbak ul n, Bombay ased No5 ien P. Daal wa

    sha/ock & nce bke accsd No.6 S. vei a

    sha/sock bke, acued No7 Palav Se wa ae/ock bk,

    aued No8 K Aok Kma a e elevan me wa e ssisn

    c Peiden of Cana Bagao au No. 9 - e V Pakh

    wa alo ha/ok boke aed No10 Nananda N Pak

    w so a ha/ock bke and ue No1 BV Sn s

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    12/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    13/245

    Javei, Paa Seh and Manbi Maa who were stck brker

    m Bmba t dier nd m te thee Fnncial Ittn

    our f e brker and t ceate a recrd on te bai f

    mirepeenatin t and aon of doument t

    dcate tat e C paced nd wth Cnbak Muta Fund

    fr he pucse f nn-cnebe debenture but, aua rea,

    n uc acn o purch f nn-nete debeture hadactuay taken pce nd n t manner nd t te tune f R

    7706800/- were llega paed n e and f ke. The

    pecutn e i, ereore, tht the accued eo dung te

    pe m Otber, 1991 t Apr 19 n rde to defud he

    Canbank nancal eie Lmted at Bagae f e ad amun,

    forged rius dcument and made e read fard dea f RI

    and 14 NCD secure wi CBMF at Mumba and eeb

    derted nd of Cna at Bagaore to Mumba and theeae

    dierted of Cana at Bangare t CBM at Ma o at he

    aoun cod be deed f e e f aued N 5 6 7, 9 and 1

    and, hereafter gn fse and ci enie w made o make it

    appear tat he aid dea we reered

    15 e peutn a examied 19 winee .W 1 M

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    14/245

    1

    V S Hegde who ws worng a Seey n Cnbnk Mutual

    Fnd at te relevant me Se sated her eence t, as a

    Seey he work o pepae vouhers and oter nd rela

    wor. The second itness examned y he posection ie P2

    M B N Sna He was wo a a robatonay Seta

    Canna a e relevant me P. 3 s one Mrs Shaa Mahar

    Dghe wo w workng a an mployee of e Bank o Amea a terelevan me P. 4 Mr Ajay Kmar Nagendna Kr He was

    worng a Taman Ban of a Ba as an Oer . 5 s

    one Mr Jaguml Randa Na He ws a e eevan me

    worg ana as Asst ede om Noembe 199

    He has rough on reord cles o Assocton o ana P.6

    M Aok Kumar He was worg as or Ve Peden

    Caa d he on deputation om Cana Ba P 7 Mr M.

    apa o ws worng he Caak Mtual Fun a e rele

    e He sted ta one M suza he head o e

    Depamen when he was worg i . P. 8 s ab ay

    who wa a eevan me wrng n e Aons ep ent o

    Bn o Amea PW9 s i Tuml He a te reeat

    e worng B PW 10 Mr. i amondas

    Ummegaonwala was worg a e relevan me a he So

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    15/245

    15

    Exchnge Bnch Bk nda He stated tat at te releant

    e he s hdg the accout of s arherm Harakcad

    P.W s M ie Maadeo Agaokar d, at he reen me,

    he wrkg Sk Exhage Branch of Bak of Inda betwee

    o 8 PW. 2 M. Vsath mr Damarau ad he was

    wrkg wih te Andr Bak, Fo Brach an Ofcer dung te

    elevnt erid PW 3 Mr Omprakh uka He was wrkn

    Cn bewee 8 and 84 s a ecty ad he was

    postd Bombay at tht me PW4 Mr si t He

    was e Cama and Mn ecor o a PW 5 is Mr.

    Gur ma h, wh w wk e Eute

    Ofcr of Cabnk Muul Fnd t Bmbay PW ne Mr .R.

    mra nd e he Canba Mutal und, Mmba P.W 17

    s Mr. Ygesh amsh Bmbadek He w wih he

    Bombay ock Excge a he relevn tme P.W 8 Mesh sh

    he Acouns Assat wth s Nabhem Hrakan.P.W

    e Ivesgatg Oe Sa Shank ha so f Sde

    Ae he se was iy estered by M Ar ank e

    e SP the vesio o the se late o hded er t

    and e cordd e evidence s wtnees H o szd

    te docmes ad record nder seize memo cept mem

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    16/245

    h accused pledd not giy o t g h w

    med by his C.

    7 The poi fo deriio s dr:-

    POS

    (1) h poseio h povd

    yod ol do e

    h eiod Oo 99 ad Aprl 992

    i Mmi d Bglore, d

    nered io il npr it

    oj of done pog of

    uds of Cn o h n o R

    782/-?

    2 W is pod y t

    proseio yod resole do

    t, i h of nl

    onspy of dosly sipong o of

    ds of t o u of

    7,782/- d oiy nd

    y decided o x t gs

    io nd nonxin dy fowd

    so dd //199

    2/991 /1/992 of ei

    seis ih vgy nd

    dpivly dd s o w L" d

    FIG

    Y aed Nos.2 11.

    Yes, ased 2

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    17/245

    17

    " NCD r te purpose of o

    tat Caa d sod/prcased te aid

    secries o/rm e Cnb MulFd CBMF a Mumba ad by us

    deve divered e oesaid d o

    e oresaid daes nd cimially

    msapprpred e proeeds eeo and

    dverted e d i te respe

    acouns acsed Ns. 5 7 9 and and oder to coceal te sid nttion

    maiplaed and reaed se ad

    tos docume ad so made enies

    e deae pads secuiy toc rter

    redidebi oces ier-b advses

    B d tereby ommed n oecepusable unde scon 20-B o e

    d el Code d/or ecn 34

    andor 09 ad i scio 03

    , nd 77 e Idian Penal ode

    read i ectio 3c read t

    seon 3( o te eventio

    Cpon Act?

    (3 Weer i is proved by e

    pseuio beyod reasoble doub

    e accusd No s te sssat Vce

    esiden nd empoered del in

    sae and pase o seures by ad

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    18/245

    18

    e of Ca o te exen of 0

    la ad tat he ad wt doe

    neno wle wongfly dpog oe nd o te Cafna exeeded he

    power delegaed o and made

    to ad onesen nao

    voling purhse of 12900000/

    of a so lled Sey "L wh CM

    and erey ommited te enepnhle under eton 3(1)( ead

    wh eon 132) of e Peeno o

    Copon At?

    (4 Wheer e proeon pved

    yond reaonable dout t e aedNo1 d puua to e onpy o

    energ o ready forrd naio

    nvolving R 1729 oe o e Seiy

    RL w he C ed Jner ak

    Adve ]A) No32100 dated 10/0/91

    for

    000000/-ad

    No32107 for

    R 9900000/- vourng CM wtout

    aaly reeg ay mem r

    oe or euity i pyi or n e frm

    of a eep om CM and eby

    ommited oene puhale nde

    eton 13)) ad w eon 12)

    o e Peveno of Coupon A

    YS

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    19/245

    19

    (5) Wheer, it L poved by he

    psecutn beyod eaable dub e ued N.1 ped mtng

    the aut f 729 oe o

    oenbly f te pe f ale ad

    puh f secue hough h wa

    de wthou y nse ad

    heeby ed an oee puhbeude et 409 o the Id Pe

    Ce?

    ( Whehe he poeuo ped

    eyond eable dubt at te ued

    No1 wh an tenton o deaud faed he bk/pape

    belngg to y kg a ae

    enty egad at vovng

    729 o d ted a oence

    pbe de 477A he

    ndan Pel Cde

    (7) ehe e ec ha poved

    beyd easble doubt ht e ued

    No2 exeeded pwer wee

    delegated to t de le ad

    pue o eue on behalf of

    d enteed o n-eet

    S

    S

    O

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    20/245

    20

    cion involving puce f 12

    ror o ed suty "14% NCD"

    wi nd cmmed n onpunhbe unde ection 3()() ed

    i con 2 of he Pevntn of

    Copn At?

    (8 Whhr it i proved by t

    poeuon beyod b dbt ht accued N.1 w nued he

    d C ying wih he Cr

    Ba's brnch at Cunigham Rd,

    Bangor ad tht hehs, in violon of

    h trs of trustmen, enteed ino a

    on-exstent aaco nvlving aamn o R 2 t Sey

    "140 NCD" with CM nd asferd

    n mun f 2 o by mkg

    enty n A Rgt ving

    wht ny oidetion nd cmmied

    n pub und 9 f

    he Indin Pnl Cd

    (9) Weth prd y

    pocuion beyond eb dut tht

    the cced o2 id h boo f

    cnt/dum belngng t C

    by mkng e e egding he

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    21/245

    21

    aacton nvolvg 12 rore s ad

    ommted n oene puihbe der

    econ 4-A of the In Pe ode?

    ( O) eher it s proved y the

    psecon eyod resoe dot tht

    te acsed No.2 exceeded he wer

    delegaed o e sae and prchase

    of sece and abed oce ypeendg to eter m dea pad a

    Bangaloe co ad non-estet

    scton vovg phse o R

    res o 4% D" he CBM ad

    eey ommted a oence pshe

    nde econ (c) read eton3() of the eveto of Coto Ac

    Wheher t poved y the

    poseon eyod asoae dot h

    the aced No, who wa etted wth

    e d o he Ca hee o

    he Copay made a og anacon

    vovg a amo of 5 roe o e

    Secy "4 NCD h he CBM ad

    sfered the d amont n avo o

    te M t any codeaton d

    eey commtted a oece habe

    nde econ 409 o he Idi Pen

    NO

    YS

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    22/245

    2

    Code.?

    (12) Whr i povd by hposcuion byod raonabl doub at

    h ad No.2 fld

    ook/doms blogng o Caa

    iolig aco of 5 co d

    ommd oc phbl dr

    tio 477A of Ida Pl Cod

    3 Whr rod by h

    osuo yod h aoab dob

    aud No2 xdd

    ahor dlgad by C

    by i g o ciio and o-ansa of 5 or d commd

    a oc pab d o

    3( ad w co 132 of

    o of Coio A

    (14) Wheer iti

    proved by eoio byod raoab doub a

    accd N2 ac of

    spracy mmitted an ofenc

    ubl dr io 9 of d

    PenalCode.

    NO

    O

    O

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    23/245

    23

    (15) Wheer i roved by e

    proeuton beyond aonble dob ahe aced No. made fae en he

    ook nd domen o he Caa n

    eet o he aon o R rore

    nd ommed an oee hae

    uder eon 47A of he Indin Pe

    Code?

    ( 16 Wher i oved y he

    oeion eyond esone dob ha

    e ed o re of he

    cay m ee of o

    aon of rhe o R 7 roe o a "4% CO", aed oe

    ad ommed oene abe

    nder eon 11) red w eco

    of he Prevenon of oon A

    (1) Wheher i

    roved by e

    roeon beyond reanb dob h

    he ed o ee o he

    osay ommied n oene

    hbe nder eon 49 o he Indn

    Pe de ree of e o-ed

    o raon of R 7 rore

    O

    O

    O

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    24/245

    24

    8) hethe poed b

    posetion beyond easabe dobt atthe acsed No2 mde ctiious ey

    he oos o aots d othe

    dcents of a regrdg

    aston o ores nd oitd

    oece pable nde cion 477A

    o he Indn eal ode?

    (19) ehe t poed by he

    posection beyod asobe doubt ta

    te aued No2, heae of

    cospac, exeded poers delegated to

    nd peended o ente to eadyord R asactio nolvg

    ont of R 7oes of e Set "

    NCD dted 12992 h BM d

    bused oc ad o itted a

    oence pushable uder secton 13(1)(c)

    red th section 132) o he Preniono Copion At?

    20) Whethe t J poved by the

    prsection beyond asable dob at

    he ccued No2 as ested t th

    doin of he sd funds, enteed no

    ctos ton vov ores

    NO

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    25/245

    ad caed e sd amut f 7 r

    b CB by ing IBA

    N32886 ded 199 wh aodran d d an oce

    pble de se 409 f da

    Pl d?

    (2) e prved by h

    p bynd ranbl db N, urc

    d cprcy d r

    red asacn ng

    am f R 7 cr bk/ppers

    n d d ece

    pnabl nd ec 77A h

    d l d

    (22) W prvd by e

    c byd rble db

    a uhrac f t sd cprc

    accud a arl e

    ng h Gr Mr f MF a

    er Oc Mba bfr rd f

    h proced f h fad ac

    dd 0/0/9 f R 79 crrs

    deced ccsd N 9/0/99

    s hq f R 899 rs

    vr f Ms SK Jer f whch

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    26/245

    2

    accused No.6 te Propreto d

    accued No7 wa uboker nd ao

    iged e ceqe ogw accudNo 1 wot y auort and for o

    osderto voug cusd No6 d

    aoter ceque No.488906 ded

    //99 for R 8,3,/-

    vourg M Nrbheam Hkhnd fo

    wrongly beeg accsed Nos 9 d ad dverted d o ccused Nos 67

    d 9 d terey commtted a oce

    uable de ecto 3)c) d

    w eco 32 of he reveto of

    Crupo At?

    (3 Wr rovd b te

    proecto od reole dot tt

    accsed No6 aded and abetted

    accused No3 te aoead to

    ad commted a oece punsle

    dr secto 9 of e Ida

    Code ed wth eto 3 d

    seco 3) o he veo of

    Couto Ac d econ 4 o e

    d e Code

    YS

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    27/245

    27

    (4) Wer prosecuion a

    sbh byon nal ot tt

    ad N.3, a maia bg gra Maagr of CBM a ir

    Ofe a Mmbai, b

    ing pocs f afs

    asacos a 0/0/991 amun

    o ,900000/- rece acu

    No on 9/0/99 sf o prpaqu a 0/0/99 R

    8,3000,000/ voug M arba

    Hhan of accus No.0

    Nannra Pak w panr and on

    bf of wic au No9 Kan

    V. Park

    eang

    and

    sn acus No3 ws not o be avaab

    n 0/0/99 Mumbai signed

    ceque barng No88906 a

    0/0/99 for R 83000000/

    onwi acse No n go i

    r o represena of

    abam araka w ase

    N3 knw M a o ing w

    s N rbra rakn wi

    si qu a b sue wou

    auory an w no sron

    faourg acus os 9 an 0 a a

    e of awg f aforsai

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    28/245

    28

    eque accsed No.3 knew t nds

    te acco of BOS fom whc e

    eue d bee drwn, were ciead ye, acced N o3 d e id

    heue daw kowg ecessay

    nds wold rogly be made avalale

    ogh CANFINA y acced N o.1 nd

    ad ac aos o al

    bac o t d s sch accsd o3 gly o absg oc a c

    ea d eby commted oence

    pe de co 3 () (c) read

    w eco 3(2) o Pveon of

    Coo c?

    (25 W oved by the

    oseco eyod eonble doub

    a eace o he crma

    coscy e asd No9 go sd

    ee ceded o e accont o M.

    Naeam Hakcnd wo ay del

    and cosdero nd he acced N o0

    ed he ad mon by g ce

    daed 0/0/99 o 825 oes ad

    eey ded d abed acced No3

    d commed a oence ise

    ndr econ 9 o he Idn e

    Code ead w eo 3()c) ad 3(

    YS

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    29/245

    29

    of he Preventon o Corpion Act and

    ecion 409 o he ndian Pal Code?

    (26) ether roed by e

    roecuion eond eanabe dob

    the acced No., n heane o e

    sd cocy being an An Gneal

    Manager of he M, eeved n mon

    f 5 e ve IBA No3686 daed1/1/1992 for edig he me o he

    accoun o Muua Fnd u

    eal ceded ame Cancgo

    Scheme c wih he Ba,

    Tmind Road Bnch Mumbai and

    thereby legay afeed he ame ohe an of aced No5 and hereb

    ommied oence hable nde

    eion 3c) nd 132 o e

    eenon of Coon Ac

    7 Whehe i l ed b he

    oeion beynd reaonable dob

    i eane of he d oiacy,

    e aed No5 go he moun of R 5

    re reded o acun wh an

    del or conideation and commied an

    oene uihable unde eon 9 of

    he Indian Pen Code ead wih ecion

    NO

    S

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    30/245

    30

    13()) nd seio 132) of he

    eveon of orupon Act nd sectin

    409 of he Ia Pel ode?

    2) Wheher i pod by he

    prosetion beyod reasonbe dout t

    he ued No. be the Vce Presidet

    o Caa exeeded powes deeated

    m d bed Oe by maki netry in IBA Regster be IBA No326

    dated /2/992 erdin o d

    oneet aton showi puhe

    of " D ad theeby mmited

    ee ushble unde secto 3()()

    ead wh tio 3 (2) of he Pvntoof oupio At

    29 Weh it proved y he

    poseuon beod easoabe doub at

    the cused No, n urherce of e

    onpcy ified he books of Ca

    d ommtted a oe rsect

    ae /2/1992 o

    7 rores ad cmmited oece

    puable ude o 477A of the

    dian Penal Code

    YS

    '

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    31/245

    31

    (30) Whethr it s poved by te

    poeton beyond eonble doubt

    e cced No4, who w a he mateme th Assistan Geral Manage of

    CBMF, srred the amount of R 7

    or t ws ded to e ot of

    Cgo Scheme of CBMF d d

    e me to the ont of e deesed

    stock broer Mnuh Milal bypag vohe dted 1/2/1992. d

    ommted oee phbe de

    eto 3(1) d with eo 13(2)

    of e Pvenon o Copion A?

    3} Wethe t poed by hepoeto beod eoabe dob t

    e ed No8 exceeded e ahoy

    whch w dged to nd o

    5/3/1992 mde ey he Sd ook

    gdig ps of 85000 he f

    Nh Spg M oh

    aed No 7 P Seh nd aed o

    of 510 oe o nd

    corepodg eg to Pav Seth -

    ed No7 d o ed IB No334

    ded 2/1992 o conodted mont

    o 2092300/ ve of

    27500000/ whot y ipt o n

    NO

    YS

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    32/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    33/245

    of A.C.C. getng o 25,0000000/-

    om Palav S acsd No7 tat w

    no ihn ompnce tog nw a t aactio was o cous

    nar nd hrb commitd onc

    pnsab undr scon 31c rad

    ih secon 32 of he revento o

    Coupon c

    Whh t provd h

    posection byond ronab dout tat

    accused No.8 was nused w

    fnds of and mde an et daed

    08/04/992 deas pad ad lgay

    ased 25 croes to ausd No.

    Palav wihou any del srty B

    ost mmo etc nd commed oence

    hbl under seco 409 of h ndian

    Pal Code

    5 Whtr i roved b

    poston byond rsable dob a

    accsd No1 wongfly credied

    said amoun by sung ceqe No88905

    daed 10/10/991 for 8,9900000-

    our Ms SK Jvri for wogully

    netng th accsed No6 nd anoer

    chqu No88906 dad 10/10/99 fo

    N

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    34/245

    4

    R 8,30,00000/ favoug Ms.

    Nrbhm Hkhd o oul

    eneng aused No 9 d 10 ddveed d of Ca o ced Nos

    6 7 nd ad commied n oece

    ale de secon 3() red

    seco 32 o the Preveo o

    Cn Act?

    (36) Whee t s proved y the

    oseco eod esoe dou

    he used No 6 9 0 e

    aeed accsed No d commed

    oence ae der seco 10 o

    e Inda Pea Code red wh Seo3(c) ad 3() o e reveon o

    Cn Ac?

    (3) Wete poved y h

    oseco eyod eaoae dou

    e aced Nos 9 and 0 deoed theeqe No488906 ded 0/0/ r

    000000/ sed y e aused

    No 3 nd d deosed e sme

    e cou wh e Bk o Sock

    Ecane Bc kown he

    amou dd ot eon o em d

    hoesy eceved he sae wo an

    NO

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    35/245

    cdraio ad cod an o

    ushable dr co 03 of Id

    P Code.

    (38) Wh it ovd by e

    poso yod easonae doubt t

    asd Nos 3 d 1 bg

    moys o CBM add ad ad t

    ased Nos 9 ad 0 to casaraio ad od a

    o usha udr so 09 o

    da a Cod ad w so

    403 o a P Cod?

    (39) Wh rovd y teoscto byod easob dob a

    acsd No6 ed ad dosd

    q No88905 dad 0/0/99

    a ou of 89900000/- ssu by

    t asd Nos3 ad ad dosd

    a n h acc kowg a sd ch dd o bog o h ad

    by commd a o ub

    udr so 403 of h d a

    Cod

    0) hr t s rod by prosuo byod rasoab do a

    Y

    YS

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    36/245

    he ause No3 ig empoyee f

    CBMF, ence e cnspc,

    ade abete accuse No6 comme are a mal

    sapppiao ommte a ac

    pube ue ct 109 ea wt

    ecto 403 o e Ia Pe Coe

    ( ) Wee pv y eposecuo eyo the easoae ou

    t th accuse Ns 6 a 7

    22//9 at Mma ecee

    epe eqe No5877 ae

    22/0/9 2 cs whc w

    sue as pe e uctos o eaccse No3, m tei j accut

    No04760 w te Bak o Aeca,

    Mm kw e a chee

    t g t em a shesty

    ecee te e wtot y

    et a comme ecepe e set 03 e

    e Ce?

    2 Wethe poe y e

    posecu eo easae ta

    e acuse N3, beg a empoyee fCBMF, uheace o e cspy,

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    37/245

    ded ad abted ased Nos 6 ad 7 t

    mmt a ee f imal

    msarrii by ittg theu iztio d or al

    mapritio of te amut agat

    th aid hu ad ommitd oe

    psble ude t 109 o e Idia

    Pa Cd d wth o 43 o the

    di Pl od?

    (4) Wee t vd by te

    preut beod reoable dob at

    h ad N 6/1/199 ried

    qu No587664 dted 6//99 r

    5 es ued/pased y h auedN4 vd vuher dated 16//99 ad

    deted te ame aout wit

    Adhra Ba Fo Bra Mumbai

    kwg at h amut agis th sad

    qu dd t beg o th h

    doely eeivg th e

    witu y oidra ter ad

    ereby mmted a ee puhabe

    udr eti 40 f te Ida Pa

    Cod

    YS

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    38/245

    8

    ( 44 Wet poed y e

    poecuton beyond reaoale dout that

    te aud No4 eng e emloyee oC n ternce o e onpacy

    aded and abtted ccued N to com

    te aoed ct o ma

    mapppaton ad eey commted

    a oence pabe under eo 10

    o te ndan Pl Code ed wh en43 o e Indan enl Cde

    4) Wete te proeton a proved

    yod reaoab dob tat al e

    acued ae ommted oen

    unale under eon 46 & o thendn Pel Code?

    4) Weher te poeuto h proved

    tat ey ad oand ncto to

    poecut te acued No 2 and 4

    4 7) Wee t proved by e

    poeuto ta the con o poute

    e aued No 8 & w no

    neeay?

    48) Wat ode?

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    39/245

    39

    18. Bee ode the l submissos, i my iew t wold be

    appropae he sbmssons of he eed Conse appeang on

    behaf of e csed ae nod. Ts ha become necesay easehe sbmsons of some of te accused nadoy o eah oe

    nd ome of em n e submssos have ed o shi he bude

    o te ohe csed hs beig e se wod be appopae o

    bey oe dow he sbmsos made by eah o hem

    SUBMISSIONS E ON BE

    OF ACCUSED NO - S OHN:

    1. he ened Cone ppeg on behf o ccsed No1 has

    sbmed a he accsed No ws caged nde seo 34 09

    20-B 09 7-A o he India Pena ode ad seco 3()c and

    ad w secon 3 2) o e Penn of Copon Ac n espec

    of e sad anaon he Coe o accsed No made he

    llowg sbmson:-

    He sbmed ere was o concse

    poof o show a e ccsed No eed oany o hese con

    He bmed th the poseco s no

    poduced ogh shee whih acodig o

    s he foemos pimary ecod of des.

    (i) He sumed a he enes n de pad

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    40/245

    4

    ad IA Rgt e no rlvat r ddig

    who wa h po who cocud a.

    (i) H bmd h t p magm was

    y awa of ao d did ot i

    ay objio a ay po of .

    ) H bmi h da i qio

    w d ad h Caa ad pr o 1,4,68200/- o h atio

    2. I ep of iiua g h ubm a foow:

    a CONIRCY

    H bmid a a o

    ima opy wa t am o do

    ig a ad agmt cod b

    po h by di o ma

    d o by both. H bmd h

    admtdy h wa o di dc

    aaiab m ad o fa a

    cma a od th

    pcio wa o a poto o bh

    the ma by og ad iab

    vd H bmd a h po

    ad o b abl o po a beyod

    h aoab db

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    41/245

    4

    VER

    He submed a he prosecutio h

    o brogh o reod maeral evee

    boh o ad domeary before Co

    d a ough h saemes o M.

    Pvee Bh, Mr. P.N. Nry Ro and

    . A.P. Ro wee eoded de seo161 o he Cl Poede Code, hese

    wesses wee o exmed ad heee

    de eene was ae o e

    gs e roseuo

    (c) A B OF

    sumed he csd No1

    wa o eused w he ud or

    domo over e uds of Ca e

    smed a he sed o. ad

    owe o eer o y dea e meda e aused oI ad o sg ay

    eques o e o Cf for he uos

    o rg e uds (BAs) owards

    aaos eered o d e eso

    who sged he ees wee i t om

    e bk u O d he Exeuve Ve

    Pesde om Me Bkg

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    42/245

    42

    Deprmen m he Geer

    dmnsn Depen s sbmed

    he ud N1 n cmmiedny cm eh f us. He sumted

    ne f the wee d deped

    n cced N.1 mde ny tteme

    cg e e e ence He

    bmed hee dcumen wee

    pduced e precun g ccuedN1 Ebts 9 40 nd 9 d

    ne f he itness tted he

    csed .1 cmmied br e dy

    ec f he s e He e

    smied h r ene under

    cis 0 0B 40 A f eIdn e Cde d ect 3 ) ed

    wit ecn 1) f e Prevenin f

    Crpn Ac e cnceed he

    prcun h been be e

    "mes-r gn cued N1 c w

    t cry rden hese ence

    n p f the i sumin he

    reed pn the fw jdmen:

    ( Rmeh Kumr Vs Se NC.T. f

    e 26 R 102

    Se f Hy V. Bj L -

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    43/245

    2 SC 6

    ( ud o Spee Co Job w V S of n &

    pe (Cr) 15 o 20 dedd on

    uu 5 5

    () Hndua S Ld, V. S of

    Osa, 6 (2) sec 62

    5) ohed Yu & noe V/ D ad

    aoh 68 Bomby 112

    ji w & Ss d V/

    ne Ip AR 8 S 85

    7 Hnn V S o R 152,

    SC 3

    8) Se of ka V L usw

    2 sec 6

    ( K Nan V/ S of Kaa,

    () sec 2

    1 Vk Joh V/s S o Ke

    3 SC 182

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    44/245

    () Mej Sngh k Vs. Stt of UP,

    (199) sec 1

    2 Ha Candra ad anoer tc V

    Steof P 1991 Cr W. 2815

    2 Jn support of te sid submsos he nvted my tenton o e

    domen on w rn w ped by e poseton s lo

    t ednce of PW2 6 3 and nd 9 He o made commen

    on id documnt T oa edene of these wtnesses be

    delt i t ater g

    SBMISSIONS ON B OF

    N02 - N BB

    22 M G K eed Col appng on bf of

    aued No2 ubmted at he oowg hrge ve ben led

    gst used v Chrge No 6 8 9 1 2 3 6;

    17. Ot of tes hrges Carg No2 4 6 9 nd 5 r s

    f ofn nbe ude vnton of Coo At

    g No nd 6 e for offnc pub nde ston

    09 of e Indn Pna Cod Chg No n ct of t

    oence of coay pab ndr con 20-B of e ndn

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    45/245

    45

    Penal code. M Kuki submttd at t sancton w

    accordd to prosecut accusd No2 was bad n law H sumitd

    tht the sd snion invd H ubmtd hat h df sancto

    w not dd and, tfoe an advere frence w ll o be

    dwn H submtted tht documnt on wic ren

    plcd by te posecuton forwrdd y th accsd Nos. 1 & 8

    d he asd No. d actd on He sbmitte tt terfo,

    t ion w acoded wot y apcaon of mid. H

    sbmtd tat te co-sgnory hng been xonerated acd

    No2 aso was b to b aqittd Thdly bmitd at even

    th n atd it , e oence under etion 477A nd

    9 w not made out. H aso submtd t the oence punibl

    unde enton of Con At also ws no mad o H ivtd

    my attnon o t n of P.W1 P.W6 .W He so

    ubmitd tt te aused No.2 ws wog i t akp

    Dpamnt to rod th asacons pu roug by

    dng

    dpmen nd he ws reporg o Vce esidnt M K Shnoy.

    H ubmttd tat h job of accsd No2 to writ down t

    actio u ro y dg deptmn basd on t

    instrctions gvn by t dalers in oug ss He s nit a

    dea no d been stowd wth te pow or authorty buy

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    46/245

    sae ewse ea saes or cuiti.

    SUBMSSIONS ON BF OFAE N.3 B.R ACYA

    23 Jad, h Consl ppag o ea of

    acce N3 m e w sumssns:

    () S sbm ha e S

    Maagm Po w hr mad

    ase r xmin t sn

    ) Sh umid o ju ws cud

    t th puc c ss ws us t

    Cna an, m Cnf rd

    adm

    (ii) Se umid a o 403 d

    5 wee mly xcliv a

    co culd g an S

    stte tat te asacos we o cil

    ae a o cimia

    ai aach o raacios

    v) S umid o c bee

    ac o pv a wa a gal

    mial corac e c

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    47/245

    or beeen o em Se sme t

    o mpl ee ed by e empoe

    Canna ga te ccused.

    v) Se umied e aused No.3 s

    o pul e ad, eee, ages

    ude e eenio o Corupio c ere

    o ced

    vi) Se e sbmied t e ccsed

    No.3 eier eed wt e nds o

    ad e any doio ove e said nd d

    eeoe secio 09 o e Id e

    Code was noattraced.

    e smed a a e mos i

    oud be s e s n rrulay

    d eefoe e provso o te dia

    enal Code nd te eveio of oupi

    c ee o ed

    ISSIONS O BtCCUSE 4 P SBBRO

    , 2 Sawae e eed oue perg o el o e

    ased No made e owng sbmsos-

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    48/245

    SO

    H sbmitd tat h ancon wc waivn by P.W 5 - G.A. Shna ur fom

    of nonappton of mid He

    sbmtd tha t cg-, n

    enty was o acd bfo h oy

    wn h acon od wa pd on

    0/03/996 H d y on o thvdnce o PW15 A nd

    m ha om te doton o e d

    wtn t wa obo tat md w

    totay nncd y h Lel Dmn

    o gg sncon

    JSO

    () e bmd ha h ocon w n

    of ve ansco dtd

    10/10/199 2/0/1991 6//99

    7//199 nd 1/2/1992 bmtd ahee o had ace o o

    06/06/992 wh w dt on wch tecl Co Ac w dmd o ha c

    o c. H mted tat teeo ed co w yond t jdc

    of t Co

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    49/245

    9

    OMIION ON T PAR OFROEUTON O NAME CPESONS ACCU:

    (i) He submited at ceta bks who

    had sied the doment wch were the

    sbject mate o the posectio we o

    ame as accse. Oe sch Ofce Si

    shok Kma Ki has deposd fo he

    prosetio Oe Ofces SM Satish

    ad Ail Nara wee o proseud No

    pao was ve for he sid omsso

    e sbmitted, terfore h ge de

    eio 120B could ot atated sce e

    ersos who wee smaly siated w o

    posecued

    RGE ER PREVETION OFION A S N AAD

    (i) e he submied hat e carg de

    setio 3(( ad ( o he Preveo

    f Crp Act was ot attracted to te

    acsed No4 sice he was employee of

    bak Mua Fd w admite

    a trst ad theeore s a employe

    MF the acsed No.4 w ot a p

    seva. I sppot of e said submssos

    ed po he dme o e Speme

    ort

    B

    V

    aoa

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    50/245

    5

    eal PeCI.

    & eped

    c) c e e ited my

    attet t te evidence f PW. 1 S..maaj PW 14 - K.N Kaat ad PW9 -

    T. and sbmitted tat case ee

    made ut " psect agt te

    accsed N.4 He ute sbmitted t te

    qesns ee sked t accused N nde

    sec 313 f e Cmnal Pcedue Cdeand cmments ee nvited n e

    dcmens med as X1 X2 X-11 X1

    d X He smited tese dmes

    ee t pved ad ence did nt sttte

    evde and culd t eed pn as

    evdece agas te ased N4 H eedn e flng dgmens-

    1 Sat ajee mcnd V/s YemSa - 197 SC 865

    (2 Nabada De Gpta V/ BedaKma Jasa - 38) SCC 745

    3 Ddas Lm V/s Emp 1932 S 69

    (4) Sant Km nd tes Vs. Te Kg 39 9 93

    (5) Cadk Pad V/ mpe - 930 34

    6)asul d V/s e Ste f

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    51/245

    Mhaasht- 972 SC 2

    Ramawami Nada V/s Te Sae

    Mdrs - 95 SC 5

    He vited my aeon to te poons o sein 403, 40 d

    sbmed t te eden o tee oeces were nt estabsed

    b e rsetion so a aused o4 s oerned

    SBSSOS O BF OFACCS 5

    25 Ke, e eaed Counel appeag on bea f accused

    No submitted at the dene aen by he aused No5 was nt

    thg ly xpl

    was isued der seto 9 o he Cml Pedue Cde He

    rter submted ta he mati w s ed ad been

    croboated y te esee repes y te te persos voled

    e ansaton. He dly sbmied hat o vestigaon as been

    ed out to d wether e explaation wh ws gve by

    te aue No5 w se H te vite y attenon o

    ote wch was given t te Copotin B beig Exhibit A5(4)

    d the Cdit Ver dated 16/0/992 e as vited m

    atet to the oe gven to the Anda B a Exi A5 and

    e eply gven by te Can t ExibitA-5 ig wht

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    52/245

    52

    sa by he accsed No H sbmed ha h Ca a n ac

    pad ha amon on 16/01/992. e sbmid accused

    o was nvovd by prosecon Carg Nos. 1 9, 10, 1 22,

    2 39 nd He vid my aenon o smns o W2

    W.4 P.W9, PW 2 and .W 3. He sumied a he saemen

    of se winesses nno esabh he case o posecuon. He

    ivied my aenon o h vario documens suh s C No

    866 -106 Ex-1 and Ehbi-2 H has aso

    cmmened on e saemen o P.W 2 and sbmed a h

    dnc givn y wie oes n any way conec h

    No5 w ommo of g on

    smied e ders renc ws iab o be drwn on

    accon o e nonexamaon of he wnesse parcuay n

    espc o he evence o esabish e agemn H reid

    oowng judgmns o h Apex Cor:

    1 P. Bngar Vs. e o aasra - 199 8

    2) rad V/s. a of aaasr 1 sc 6

    ) ieun Heco Tomas Huney V/s.Empeo (31 19 Feder C 66

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    53/245

    3

    He as ao eneed wen submisios. I a nhel is argmes

    be smmrze as nr:-

    (a) rspec of crg of cospiray, e

    sumie a the charge as ame es n

    ae o of he harge-sheet e in he Cr

    a herore he carge was usaile

    aw. e sbm a he hrge was

    slen s wch par f he spircy was

    vk by h pscuo n spe f he

    aege ee. e ste h cage

    even n he bs of he eiene le by he

    prosen fas o he gro as n ene

    s bee l sppor o he prosecin

    . h n smie s fr carg

    N 9h an 1h re cocee s

    No.5 ws n in ay way conn w

    o en fm he eee of wneses

    e fher submie h he rge Nos.

    22ly an 23rly ar ba n e legain

    he s No4 ws smn n

    mkg pymen o e s No. an

    ws fe by he eene of PW9.

    submie e prseio has no

    xmne h wiesses m M who we

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    54/245

    sgtoe of who ould ve been

    deposed bo he pymen of 6/0/ 99

    wh wod hve esbihed he noeceo used No.5.

    () He sbmied ha so far s aued No.5

    s oeed, he oy ee dae as

    1/0/99. He ubme h he dee

    o e ued No s o //992 ahe ie of CB he hd ised heqe

    of R oe fog ooaion B by

    wy o aommodio d ht he sid

    mou w eued on //992 d

    he did o eeie y mou fom

    d) He bmied h none of he domens

    o whih ee as bee ed by he

    poeuo ebh he e Noe o e

    o eidene w i og on eod

    uppos e poseio se. e fhe

    umied he ee s bee ped by heoe o on he judgmen of e Apex

    o Mu's e b i be

    disgushed i he fs d iumses o

    se

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    55/245

    Furthe deted submsos of Kle wl e dscussed te

    ppopite stage

    SBMSSONS ON BF OFACCS NO S. V

    26. M. Sh he leed Coue ppeaig on eh of ccsed

    No6

    SK Jei sumted at he acced No6 wa onced

    wi hg Nos 1, 32, 3, 37 and 38 e sumited t so f

    e ist tncon s concened dated 0//199, none of e

    wesses hd nmed e acsed No6 SK hei. He nvted my

    attetion to the stement of P.W.9. He ther sumitted at

    Nihia wo ws te occsed a the eevant poit of me, was

    ae on dopped as n accsed d he ws o not exmined by e

    ocuon He sumtted at eve e poseton s ten

    it i, it wod esta t e cused No.6 hd o wy of

    knowig t te amoun elonged to Cana. He sumitted t te

    PW9 ttement egoc ded he d ee

    ormed e acused No.6 S.K ave. He so nved my

    attetion to he sement of ccused No1 nd PW.9

    Ivesgag Oe He vted m aton to e documens at

    Et A-65) & Exhibi A6(6. He aso poted ot that te

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    56/245

    6

    docmen a Ebi A618 learly esashed tt a susntal

    payme ade y he ased No.6 o Ca fer //

    d was not onsone wih h odu of he eson who

    wed o aoe he aons fo a o Canank. In a

    n sell e sued s nder:-

    a) Th evde addd y e oseuondd o dsoe e l oniy

    e ws o evdee o d

    e ased No6 had kowedge ha oney

    eonged o CBM

    () Tee as no evdene o nde a

    e ed o6 idued y nk ol o

    iue cheqeofR8.99 ors.

    d) ere ws nog t da a ee

    was any deeny n he ak aou o11/1/1991

    (e) Te doenty evdene w ws

    oght on eod y e oseuto lel

    ndaed t was a gr tnsatio

    ad ha, in e neve hd yde

    oneon wh he Bnk d a

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    57/245

    5

    Sh ausd o7 as d

    b

    Th d ry dad a

    r r rar raos h aud

    Nos 9 d ad h as o ay

    od h aao dad

    //99

    ) H ao d y ato o

    sa o W8 o Aos

    araad H

    d y ao o Eb A9

    Ehb A8 Eh A9 Ehb a

    96) ad t A- 6( H ubd aa hs doua d s ao h

    oa d oud o bh h as o

    h roso

    h) H urhr y ao o th

    sa o W7 hr hh

    dt sre bo o SK Ja

    hadd or o C oh au 2

    ros ad u a d by ausd No6

    r rory o t sad aou hh as

    pd Cur

    ) H d o h rs

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    58/245

    58

    hrge of conpy hee no edece

    egg volemet o accuse No.6. He

    ee upo he juge of e Ax Co Ram Nat Maoprsd and

    v

    .

    S of Mah Padesh epo 1953

    SC 420 i Pandua andor

    V

    Sa of yderaba eo 1955

    26. e ubmite h e cge fo the

    oce ue eco 409 3 w oesashe e eie po e gme o

    e Ap ou Ramawamy ada V

    Te Ste of Madrs eoe 158 S 6

    a U Dha and anoe V S o

    Jd

    and ths epoe 3

    SC 97

    SUBSSIONS ON BF OFAS N7 V SH:

    M Panhe, he ee oue ppeg o o

    e o7 me the proeo h o eme

    ea we a so a o poe eea omes

    Sok Reg a he Rgse egg movme o e he

    Depame. e sumie ha heeoe vee neece

    iae o e w o o exmo o e ee wese

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    59/245

    9

    for non duon o matel documens H d my no o

    h edene o PW6 Ahok W 3 Oph

    W.7, W 9 d W8 He ubmied ta h vd wh

    ught o eod dd no ndcae n any nn h h ed

    No 7 w ay wy nvoled wth th alegd on In a nhe

    h bm a nd:-

    (a) dr re wa ble o be

    drw gai the prsecuon.

    () Th subna l

    d

    wnse o he oeuon

    ( h we tana non

    bween ' Cn nd he o

    nd h were my 300 nao

    e o Canba

    (d) he boo o aou wee no

    ly mnaid

    ( h hag o iy h o b

    hd ans the ued o

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    60/245

    60

    SBMONS ON B OAS N08 - MK ASHOK KMAR

    8 M. mi Dsai h lan oun aeang on bha o h

    e No. 8 M.K shok Kma sme h chare No

    4 5 7 9 an 30 wee me aa accs No8. H

    sm h sa o rgum osecuo a

    mae a samn h h were no rsn crgs re o

    ao a 7/9/199 an 11/9/199. He nve m aon

    o h semn o nsss on wic rlac w l he

    roseon P.W, W. .W.7 W 7 o h relvan

    oumns on wi rnc was y he roeon. I

    ns sbme n:

    (a) vr neee ws lal o ra

    a he roon or no amng M

    Jos souza wo e Dvsiol

    Mag o . sbm a h

    roscuon ma a aem o how suc

    rson o s.

    Thr s no mea agins a

    No8 he omns on w relane wa

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    61/245

    61

    pced by e rosecutio sppo of he

    rge, id o eblish tht e accsed No.8

    ws voed te commisio o the oece

    (c) Ne o he dcmt o whih ince

    ws ped eithe siged by the ed

    No.8 or hd .

    d) It w rgd tt no ss hd give ycrmg edece git he csed

    No.8

    e Tee w nether dct or dect or

    ccmttil edece gi the ced

    No8 respect o y o he chrges

    The oy mtce gs ccsed

    No8 w e w Ce Dee o C t e

    reet me

    H de deed bmisios spet o e eidence d

    docme o record wic wd be oidered at he ren sge

    Te eed Coe eied o mber o jdget o he Aex Cot

    wich w deat t he eevt ge.

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    62/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    63/245

    63

    and did not take any steps to ver wheer te expaton wa

    coct or not He submtted tha no herefor made out y te

    posecuton agat tese acused.

    SSSOS O F OFAS 1 - BV SAS

    30 T leed Coue appeag on behalf o ccused No11 BV

    Srsn, sbmtted t te accued No1 wa e Juor Oer

    and was Fnd Maager of nbons Fund of nbak Mual nd

    He submted at acsed No1 was subje to dyto-day

    uertendene and don and ntrol of acused No3 - B.

    A Asisant General Mage, Divoal Mage etc.

    He bmtted at e u No11 was meey one of e sgaore

    along w e Gneral Manager BR Achaya accsed No3 for te

    opeaon of e rren ccon of he anbonus Fud He sbmed

    ta ce tere were no clea cut des and respobes ecfed

    by he Management he Fund Maages wer not kig any

    emen deon ey were merey dog aontig work o

    e und e brgg he ons to boks of account as per

    bak entes recepts d paymen He ubmed t the accued

    No1 wle sg cheque for 8 99 ores and R 830

    oes dad 0/0/99 whch are at Es 14 5

    j

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    64/245

    hd mrly adhrd to e ucons ivn by ad No.3 B.R

    Ahy H ubmid ht cd No3 - B Ahy d

    d to id o q on 9/10/1991 ilf d

    wr igd by ad No.3 a gory No.1 ad

    asd No.11 h id h o igao r rn n

    opion. H bmid th t d No3 ad eir gin y

    omao nor dai of h on. H bmtd h h

    atdane regir did BR Aaa no Mmbi o

    10/10/1991 H bmd ha, hrfo ad No11 had d

    mry on rio of ad No.3. H d my

    anon o h mn of P.W19 - Invigng Oir. He

    bmitd t t IO d admd o-xmno tha

    m o d No1 wa o mod n h FIR He o

    dmd dng ivgaion i aprd a th ad No3

    hd gn tion on 9/0/1991 to ad No11 o ppa o

    hqe dtd 10/0/19 ad on hq wa givn o aed No9

    ohr hq givn o aued No.7 beg e rpeenv

    of d No6. H bmitd w ormd by PW9 -

    T whn h ni i anda gir wer ow o

    H bmid ror th aed No.1 had ad good

    th ad hd d o ntrion of h r ahoii e

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    65/245

    acced No3 nd tt te aed No ad no edo o oie o

    aoty to queson e bonfdes of accsd No..

    GS OSO

    er ang perued e oal and domenty eece on

    record n my ew proecuto ped beyod reoab dob

    e cags agns acced No 8 3 5 7 9 & 0 Howee t

    h led o e cg eveed g ad Nos 2, 4 &

    for e folowg ro t ot erenfte.

    32 ewee 0/04/199 o 06/06/992 t wa notced by e

    Gvme tat ter wee lrge scale egure kg

    acto d und of Pubc Secor Udertakgs wc were

    veed n Naonalzed and oer an were poned o or e

    pose o dealng n pc seurtes and ee ge amon wwere e r te pe of pbc seces we no aked p

    y ny pysca cre or oer coaeral ecte suc GL

    ec Sn, ereae e sm broke ou and e invesgaton was

    mde nd a repor w ubmited by a Commtee w popry

    own Jkaan ommtee w dscloed lrge scle

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    66/245

    66

    glaes wi w commid by Publ Sor Undaking,

    Muual Fund Nonzd B wi lp of bok. Th

    vtgto w md y nta Buu of Invtigation (CBJ)

    d mal omplait w gtd agat vou pon n

    nt a omplt w odgd on 164 t 1500 o

    and n omt on w ow ad 1 Si

    S Mon Aitnt V idnt aa Bgao 2) Sh .

    Blubmnm Atat i Pdnt, , Bgo 3)

    Si B.R. Ahaya, Gnl Mg nb Muul und Bombay

    (4) Si Ani aia, h Dl nb Muual nd

    By S BS S Ro Assisnt Gn Mag Cna

    Mutu und Bombay ) M/ abam Hknd Sha &

    Sto Bo, Bomby, 7) Si tn P Daal Sa & Sto Bok

    Bobay 8 S SK havi S & S Bok Bombay ( Si

    Pa S Sa & Stok Bok Bombay (10) Si Mub

    Manl Sa & Sok Bok, Bomby d ( Si nugopOf Ba & Sto Bomba a om t

    wa gd ht l d d ot to bo o Bomby

    d nd o opiay ad hd pond o R

    7 7068,200- nd ht h d amount wa td a wot

    ntt gly. n ompant, da o h v aaon

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    67/245

    he bee menoed a refud alogth teres so

    dated t was leged hat cerin mou were pd to Paa

    Seh hough a t me he owed severa ore of rpee to Caa

    ad he sai proe, na ufered a os of R 312,87

    interes th efet o 24992 l g of he copn

    The chrge-seet a ed o 291996 n out of he

    ae mentoe e FR ame of Sh Veugopa wa

    dropped Sh nba l a expired by ht time nd,

    therefore nme s so rppe om e hge-hee

    mlay though he hargeheet w e agt Sh

    arhia n S ayhda N Parekh, te me we o

    dope he saio o proete was ge by KN. Kah

    Chaia a nagig Drector of Canban Fl Seie td

    ide eter o247796 dated 232996 for he proseto of N

    Bubmam ccued o2 Shr .A Shea Chief xecte

    Ofcer Cabak ut d aoed nto to poet P

    Subbaa - aued No.4 vde leter No.CP & A/0196 dad

    1996. Sr S oa aed No1 nd Sri K. Ahok Kuma

    ased o8 wee remoe fom sevce uig etgato

    Smar Sh B Aharya accsed No3 ad Si B.V Sriaan

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    68/245

    ae hd e he ee dg he cre f vega

    3 The ae f he preu herefre, ha he d f

    Ca wee veed ve dffee ac a h bew:-

    Sr. Dat mn Seme Dd o

    01.1991 729 bnu sd N.9 ad1 N.6.B

    2 22..99 12 sd Ns. 6 ad7 BO.

    .

    1.11992 5 d N Bank

    4 992 Lt ManuhaM

    5 1.1992 s Lt ManuaM

    d hereae he d were reed bck ugh eg mea

    The am wa eeed m ak 1 & "I Se he

    e f R 377,820/ hu he m wa remed he

    fg maer ad exe am wa eved

    l

    (R)

    7,0

    ,

    ,

    ut vd fCanaa B F & Ic By

    E vd

    Pcul mo ated

    () 172901% NC 12 96

    4%N 745222

    77060

    378

    03

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    69/245

    69

    Ou o ese mns, fwig ms were pd o e r

    acused:-

    660. Hcud H P 8676M M 68

    R 9

    35 Durg e or agmes he leed Pub reor

    M VG Prd mde eme h he ws o preg rge

    n rese si ded 7/99 d 1/21992 epe o

    rene R rre d R 7 rre om C o e

    Mbi Mek Hee we oeed wi oy hee

    o emnes ded //99 222/99 d

    6/1/1992 d ever o he ue Rs 3772/-

    36. ere I de wi e evee o rerd nd osder e rv

    ubmso s ee o e no codeo he gnz

    s u o e hree fca suo (a) bk Fn

    Seies Bglore () b Mu ud my

    CM d (c) Cb & I Seio omby I so eesr

    o be ider e mn n w Cn eered o

    o o e d use o eue

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    70/245

    7

    37. Qa i 100% subsidiry of Canbak. Cana cayng

    on busness of leaig, gher purhae ad mehnt bakng

    acviies As a par o merchant bakg atvties Ca made

    vesments stok d ao the seonda make .e sale and

    hse o shas. PW5 is evidene tated ht he joined

    Cnara Bk n Deember 1971 and Novembe 12 he as

    deuted to Cana s an Asst Ve President d he bugh

    on eod Memondm and Artles o Assition d the sm

    mkd at eered under he Compaies

    Act and cuse 20 o Artcles/Memorandum o Association,

    aozed o vesents Govement and othe

    secuies, nldng shres Unde clause 21 Cnna was epoweed

    to lend, advace money wi or iot secut However, y vrue

    o the id cse, it w prhed m dog ny busess o

    bakg deed he Bag Rgaos t a hs its

    local Oce in Mumba d also has ts cont a B

    Mumbi (Emphass suped)

    38. sed No1 S Mohn w Asst e Pesden ad wa

    wokig at the ged e o at Bangalore. Aed No.8

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    71/245

    MK Ashok Kumr was Eecive Vce Pesdent, wokg he

    me Oce d aed No2 N. Bubama ws Assa

    Vce ese workng e bcup depme of e sme Ofc

    W.2 Mr. BN Skaa has s so eece paa 6. He

    so sed ccused No.8 MK Ashok Kuma a aed

    No1 S Mo wee auhorzed o buy d ale secies o behaf

    of Ca

    39 u d M i us d ws hoze

    o mke esmes nd o ed moe d me

    dces d had accouns Td Le Brach of Ca

    B Bomby Clae 5 of e s Deed empowee e

    ruse (a o cq hod mge, de ad dpose o sres d

    debeues () bow o otee e moey wh o io

    sbjec o he ms s my be ecded by e Tsees.

    a B aoae Bak d is m use of MF

    40. he sceue bk i r oaze or ohewse

    wee eed ough he decos sed by he B om e o

    e d hese decos wee ued ude secto 2 ad A of he

    Bg Regao Ac

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    72/245

    72.

    PROSEION WF:

    41. scto s exied al 9 wtees O f tee 9

    wsses, PW. 1 Ms. Vit Sd Hegde (-3) P.W 7

    Mr. M. Papa Rao (Exit1) PW. 9 M. Rv Tumaai (Ext-

    PW 15 M. Gr Anarma Sea (:ibit28 ad

    PW6 - M. SRaa Exit-130) are al Cbak winess.

    P.W 2 Mr. BN r (Ebt6) PW 5 - M.

    augmli Rabdr Nat (Eit-56) PW 6 Mr. K Asok Kuma

    K Eb-S, PW. 13 - M Omr Kian (xb-23) &

    PW 4 - M. K Naasima Ka (Exbit-26) a wsse m

    Cana

    PW 3 Ms ia Madar (bt-3 and PW 8 - M

    b Ray (Ebit) bo were wrg Bn o Ameic

    P.W. 4 M Ajay Kmar Nagedra Kr (ibit-49) i a

    wtness wo w wrking the Tamard Lne Bc f Caaa

    B

    PW. M. Di Jagmandas Ummrgowa (xb1)

    ad PW 1 M Kio Mde Agaor (Exit14 wr

    wkg he k Exnge Brc Bank o India.

    .W. 2 - M Vash Kma Damaraj (it- 88) was

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    73/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    74/245

    4

    poiion o bing o ecord any de eidee n pect of he

    eged ml nspcy hed ewee e acued. It h,

    hwever atepd o prve he harge of ci opcy by

    yg o ng on rd vee of ds o Can o Cak

    M Fnd (CBMF) nd here to he epecve boke d

    agn re o nd o e ke Cnk Muua nd

    CBM) and iatey o Can Tugh e evidee Can

    epyee he prectn ha aed e er i wch he

    prhe and e of ecie wee de and he pocede t

    oowed n epe of keepg of d The poeuin

    exined CBMF empoyee hw ey had eeived fud ad

    the duent t etaih npray hve been ough o rerd

    Theeer he oun of he indivu ke i vaiou

    uh Bk of Idi, Bak o Aea, And Bak ec ve een

    bugh n ed o hw t ee au wee edied n he

    d on Corepondigy he proetion e

    hugh

    e che r e o cure feed Sda Book puse

    hee ecriie "RV' & 14% NCD" o e reevn dae o

    whch puhe w de n gured n Sada Book and

    erefe, i ha gh o ge h ee ascion o puh of

    eie wee io d ogu acon d e oney in

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    75/245

    7

    ct, ws siphoned o oug brokers. Frter it ged a

    eres wee made to how t the was a wrog remte of hat

    patr amot releed the asto eh of he ree

    dae (bease i respe of wo aos e o R rores d

    7 ores ges ave o ee presed y th poseo) d hese

    domen were ae o alered to how t he wrg emae

    rep. I argd hat ty i w show heedoume ha og eme w mde o CB d late o

    wod "CB soed t gued ws doe o

    suppes asr o uds m CBMF o okes ad whe the

    amo was repad it wa ot show hat was repaid y CMF to

    Ca Proetio has oiousy ought o eord hee

    doume to esah te of tavelg of d om Po e

    om Caf to PotB CMF o PoC ie rkers ad PoD

    e ga r-ow of moey to C i rd therefore t

    wiho erg reeipt physa fom o seurties whe purhses

    wre mde hge u ros of rupees we dveted t

    gued y the poseco hat aued No1 SMoh ad acsed

    No8 M.K. Ahok Kuma were ot auhoizd o de prhe d

    se o ses yod the parulr mi ad ye wthout

    ahoriy they hd alegedly eered o h atio d

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    76/245

    6

    eer, ey d commtd oence of cmnal beac o

    puhbl nd scion 409 o I.PC ad d miaproprd

    on and commid an oence hble nde econ 03 o

    IPC. and cio 1() (c ead w eon 3 2 o e revenon

    o on Ac and or rpoe ad crad cd

    doumn nd eore, had commid oence uab de

    con 7-A o C

    n he een a, bmion mad y e led co

    e ad t e no dc or dc vdnc to ow a

    hre wa conay dir nd m nn o oke

    nno ad t wl td law a dc o ge

    direc ednce c o opic o cmm n onc and

    e o circumana edc can o ccmstanc s to b

    eahed w pon ot o gi o e ccd Jn e

    en poon ner al ha ccefy brogh on

    rcod dom dnc o a

    Comany grd ndr Coni Ac 0% dry

    ony o a C Ba wch a naonaled ank Thogh

    ile 2 o Arcl o ocaon pmi nna o by and l

    ci and o o nd money wh o iho cy, by ie o

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    77/245

    77

    e prvi on 21 f te Bakg Rglatns Ac and h

    gid-n ad dwn by t m o m wi v

    ttu c, t dd nt th trty t nd ny ne

    "d b d y b bak ag t ri

    f tn 2 f t B gn A d, adtdy Ca

    w t bank ang f ad t. h n

    n hat CB nt rhng r ng r n ba

    Cana PW. 9 tatd ed at CBMF w n

    hng r g r n b f T dn

    n bn d by any d a bng

    oo w o qo o m o n

    w wr td deret aat t CBMF. CBMF n

    t ad ar g rd ny Caa wh

    ardng te r w wr rad by r a

    ad N3 and ary ndtd at t t w wng

    ttd Ca t CBMF ad n wer t wr

    wg ta rd y ad t t bak

    Caa aed N.3 n t y td nt t

    t bkr asd N.5 6 9 ad 0 It n brgt

    erd ht day wn t yt wa ad

    Ca t CBM th a day r n day r tat,

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    78/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    79/245

    9

    by shg a ere wee osnsle pue nd sale anactions

    sds esaled m he evdene whch een rogh

    rrd. T idene ery estahes ased Ns nd 8

    d n autiy o ener nt ans ynd e prul it

    ye, o ag saon om e hgher oers hey eaed

    rrd song e Deal Pad enes d eme the amn

    CBMF A a d e t BMFs end ased Nos 3 and reeivd

    money reaed vers to shw a e mn s rongy reivd

    a nd ye pd th amon o he rokes T

    esalshes h ws n aal an een ged

    ehal ed at ere s n ass for he prscn ca

    t lransato prs d a setes were enerd

    he Sauda Book E amng r h se gmns ha h s

    e y h voers wh wre prpard y he als o CBMF

    shw h ere ws n sh nan ewse tey would have

    reaed erd t nda a he mon was reed r e

    prhse f L N sees On h n he vohers

    dae a he amon was ngy rmed o CBF Copled

    wt ths hee evdene on rord o shw h CBF s nt

    delg purhse r sae seues n el o Cana I

    Cana aned o purhse a sle series ould h doe s

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    80/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    81/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    82/245

    82

    upo R 50 crores per acon, e toal no exceedg R 300

    oes pe day for sae nd pchase epaaely. Under Exhibi-18

    wch are mues o he Bord Meeng daed 30/11/991 powe

    wee delegaed as ecommended der Ex17 y hb19

    wh a oe oe daed 2391991 he Mng Drecor

    ecommeded deegaon of pow o Ahok um accused

    No8 The recommedo were mde y ccued No2 N

    alsubrmanam nd K Shenoy wh urher recommendao by

    M PN. Narayanro who w he ecuve Vce Presden he ofce

    oe w aso gned by he Mnagng Drecor M AP Ro

    49 In edence PW6 Mrsho um n(herenfe

    rered o as "A. n i oder o avod cofuson as ccused No8

    MAsho umar) has gven deas regardg he mane i whh

    he prhse and se aco were mde n he rnsacons d

    0191 221091 & 16192 ce we concened puae ofshae shal ve des egardg he mae of pchse of shres

    s saed by PW 6A n pra 11 and 5 of evdence

    PW. 6A deposed o he eec ha In case of prhse of

    hare, he sons were cocluded by the chef dealer of Ca

    a Bangaoe on eephone wh he boers On concluson of he del

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    83/245

    83

    h would note it do i Sauda Book and paymnt r o

    pucs a and wn i o mad s ddd upo by f

    dae d wod v nsucons on on o Caa Ba

    Bac n Bombay o m e paymn on ha o Caa. We

    uing, e wod o convy o pon IBA ub Te

    C dr s woud w dow IBA mbr w n

    t C Bak Bombay i IBA Ise Regsr IBA i

    ppad y Ba oc s p sons JBA rer wod

    oain IBA nmbr dat and Ca Ba Brn nm and th

    amon O t ba o ese detas ba oic woud pp

    q vog Canr Bak Bnc i Bagaor On

    bs o at eqe h Caara B Br wod pr BA

    whh s gnry kn y o by Fuds Dep o Can

    Bngao a n o o Canaa Brnh i Bombay Caaa

    Bk at Baoe woud dbi accont o Caa by amon

    o e cqn o a Cna's own rsacon o e ad

    pa e armn ha e ous ppaed or l

    d urca on bai o aa boo e ohs

    prpd a intera ad ot on day a o pa d

    as on b o Potoo iens ar concd siar vouchs e

    paed by e B Dprm o Fns Dparm4

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    84/245

    Vouce would ontn e nate of e eit, qnum phae

    o ae ate e boke me a he aggegae mout reeivable o

    pyble. I o f Cana' own asacton ae onceed te

    voe e ep n te nvee Depame wh wa ue

    me nd the oche would e ged b me o r te orto

    nto ae oee te oe e peaed b e Ba-up

    Deptmet a oe o the O wog n e ack-up

    Depment The Cheue ssue Regte maed b e Bakup

    eme the ouse o bue of n"

    O PW2 - B Skanth w te Fnd epe o

    Cna. He w matag e egse ad ent se a

    ued o ated he oe ba wo l pepg ee He

    te that acued No8 - M A Km d ccued o.1 S.

    Moan wee wog ele n F Dpatm He h te

    t he deae us to me en e eal a He h aed

    hat aued o nd sed 8 e t ve m e Pd ad

    heeae W2 se to xeox o of te elevant ea ad -

    the po o ma enty n the eod d ae tng out xeox

    o te og eal ad was etued a o ae o. o

    aued o8

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    85/245

    85

    5 PW. 1 - Mrs Virt Su Hegde tted her

    evdence ht e Bakers o Caa, Bangalore we Ca bak

    Cgham Road Brnh The heqe dw by Cnna i cse of

    pae o seriies we n avor o Ca B Cnghm

    Road B, Bangalor s doe by PW2 BN Sanh a

    e he ons o acse N2 - N B asbana n

    ai o IBA

    W 9 - Mr R rl h he sad a C Ban

    Ml d (CBMF) wa a ceated by he Cra B whh

    he ee and a e relean e had

    aroxaey 13 nds and whh were sed o e lled rd

    and here wee dfent sees e Sae CN Gowh,

    CANCO, CNL e

    s evide ebhe ha oney w enrsed o aced

    No 1 & 8 and a a oe ws se se o rchse o

    eres

    E F L F 17 2 F F 10.09

    3 n orde o rove he oeen o nd o Ca he

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    86/245

    86

    o R 1.29 os ad h ulma dsaio of hs fds o

    h vrous aons of bos, posuon has xmind

    WNos 1 2 4 6 10, 18 ad 19 PW. 2 and 6 a om na

    .W. 4 om ara Ba Tmarid La Ba Mumai, P.W1 s

    aak mpoy PW 9 s o anb mpoy. PW 10 s

    mploy a of d W. 18 s h Accous Asssn o Soc

    Bok Ms Nrbhram rchad, PW 1 9 s h nsgaig

    Oc

    5 PW2 a 2 dposn sad acd No

    Mohan and acud N o.8 - MK Ashok Kuma w da Funds

    Dpamn ad y nldd h dal as sad ha hy sd

    o pacuars Dal Pad. Ausd No.1 mad ny

    hdrng sp f pchas on 10/10/1991 o RL o h

    aggrga am of R 729,00,00 om L ndicas

    anc dsris mid. s h lumn ad

    eadyfow d( sum o R 89cos o Rb a

    pero dat

    o 2. Th ry fuh dcas a

    amn was rmd y IBA N.3200 r R 8 rors and BA

    No207 or R 92900000/ om aaa Ba amrid a

    ah omay. T al ah s id aEib h

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    87/245

    87

    prosecution then reed on the evene of P.W 6 M A.K

    PW 6 hs alo staed te same g a hs been saed by PW2 In

    para 18 he stated tha i the BA sse Regste No thee s an

    en wih regard o BA No 3200 regrdin R 8 crores ssud on

    Tamarind Le Branch, Bombay The sad enty a Exb-3 9 At

    age 63 here s n en regd to BA No3207 T ent

    gadg te amount of R 929 ores i ssed on Tamarnd

    ane Branch Bombay I at Exit-40 He sed tht thogh

    hese BA numbes are same s a mentoned t-59 e tot

    of the amoun of hee to BAs R 17 29 ors w he

    amont menioned Ex59 (msis suppied)

    55. W 6 evidence para 2 s sted at e Sauda ook

    w mantaned by Cief Daler i wch the sle n purchase

    nsactions were menioned. n par 9 he h sted ada

    k conted 70 pages nd was for e e m 27/05/199

    to 29/05/992 nd onted enry wh rgd to sale nd phse

    of shs nd alo other securties. Upon being show entes on pae

    5 e statd tha the enres on t age were r he eriod

    beteen 3/09/199 nd //99 respect o October 1991

    here wee v ntes $ Nos 3 t l Nos 35 These

    .l

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    88/245

    8

    entes wee boght on ecod xhit-0 oly. He has ther

    stated tat as o wigd Pad Eibt 59 In

    he evdenc of PW6, he has sated a the paymen fo thoe

    puces ad wen t was o b mad as deded pon y the

    Ce Dee nd he would ve nsto o elephone to Ca

    Bank Bch Bombay o make paymen on behalf of Ca H

    wod so ovey o eepone BA nme he Chef ea

    msef wod we dow te IBA nmbe te BA ssue Rete

    wch wold conn BA nmbe date the nme of cara Ba,

    Bobay and he moun. W 2 staed h deae acced No

    s. Mon d acsed No8 M ok Kma sed to ve ea

    ad to m and wod ke xeox copy of te elevant ea Pad

    te ppose o mkng eny n he BA Reste He as stted t

    spe of on t ey ws o page 2 gad to

    A NQ_32100 gadg R 8 coes sed on Caar Bak amad

    Lae B, Bomay The ad enty t Et9 and espect

    e ot on page te enty n egd o BA No.2107

    egadg aon o R 929 coes ed on Bak Tamd

    Lae h Bombay e enty s at xht40 and the BA numbes

    sme s we menoned n t-59 he total amont o p

    JBAs was R 729 o h was the ont mentoned n D

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    89/245

    89

    Pad - Exbit-5 and o e enes n bs-39 ad 40 wee

    hndwng of acusd No1 S. Moa W 2 as ur sad

    Baup O would pepar a q on h ss o

    deis and, acordingly, a eqe drn n vor of 'orsevs

    IBA on Tmnd Lan Bomay r a sum of 8 s was

    rie y W.2 d sigd y N Nyao e rur smp

    idated h e amon ad e rsfrd marnd Lne

    Bnh of Cn Ban Bomay Te s eqe is a Exb-21

    W2 e sed e prpd aor e n s

    o drig dad 0/0/1 o Ca Bk Bgao,

    drwn i vor of "Yoursves BA on Tmd Lan, Bomay for a

    sm of 200000/ and s sgd y AK e s

    ceques a Ex2 and 2 w dposied Caa Ba

    Cunnigm Road Brnc and enry n sp of te said hee ws

    mad e saem of Cu Ao No 266 mied y

    h wh Caa Bak Cugam Road Brn Bango

    wh is a ii162 W 2 r sd o ass o

    th qu, Cd Sps we prpd y Bacp Dparm

    w wre a hbis22 d 24 respey resp of wo

    on Aordgy te sa wo amous w rmid y

    C for edi of CBMF (Empss sppd)

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    90/245

    90

    56 From he bove evee te poecton estbsed tt

    he mot o 79 croe w emtted b Cnn d ws

    eie te cout of CBF. The posectio s estbed te

    emitnce of 9 croe om C to CBF i repect of e

    s tston dted 0/0/99

    57 Aer e mout ws remitted to CBF it h bee

    boh o reod t e Cb ul Fun d ccot wt

    Cra Bn Tmi Lne Bnc d r ws mde om oe

    Bc to nothe Bch b elerapc rfr o m re.

    Te ed ofce of Cara B i stted t Bloe

    58 he Cnr Bn Tmid Le B umb ecee

    messe o poe om the He O d t preped mm Debt

    Sp Hed Oce Aont dted 0/0/99 for um of 8 ores

    d other Sp for m ofR

    99 core d bot tee mot

    were credted i Aot No 3980 of Bn d debit slp ws

    boht o b W 4 M A Kmr Nedt

    t Exibt54(

    59 P9 - M. Rav Tium h depoe edece e

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    91/245

    mittanc f fd CBM m Baa, wr n h

    frm f IBA d h Cana Bk Tmrnd L Bah wa t

    bak nitay BA nmb d b yd tph by

    y al m a Bgal ad, tratr, h phycl BA

    f h am nm d t b vd m na Ba ad

    m tat hy w abt th ra m Ca Bagar

    ra Bak aJard Banch. Th d wd thn bfwardd th prcrbd frm fr d d

    (Sm) accnt ad pyic w civd BA nmb

    wd b mtd pbd fm. a hr tatd tat

    r w xt t f C Bak CB tf

    60 P.W ha tatd th nrmay am wa

    rngly rivd, it wd b back t h d ha d

    a traa hr wa in rm pac

    d that acd 1 BV. Srvaa wh wa wrkg Fnd Mgr B rct Scrtay .W

    d t prpar chr Adgy, h pad vhr

    hadrng v w i tw part at w

    pct f dbi ny and h wr pat w n rpct crdt try

    hr b prdd at xbt-7 by P.W t

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    92/245

    92

    uppr p of he docment, th a mtio of "C bos d e

    debt e amo 17.29 or. T amuw dbied

    SundCr ers ct.

    was o do h mout wa

    wogly remied o Cabak Ma Fd, Bomba T debt enry

    md by PW s per ruon of d Mager M BV.

    vasa - used No. The owr pr of he doumet Exit

    78 th rdt part refrs o he mou of 7 o g

    dt to Bakrs amd Le er aso refern o wo

    Chq No488905/906 e dorme "a amn

    wr

    d o CBMF y by Ga Bglore. w

    re

    ai

    d.

    I dormt h word rmttd to Ca

    gaor wr sord of d the word rpad wa wrt. .W

    ha atd that s do r cons of M. BV

    Sva asd No. (Emp uppld)

    Aed No B.V Srv r gng ro d

    prpro of voer at 78, preprd wo e

    ow hdwrt wh d by m ad aoe ccd

    No.3 - B.R. Acry Oe of CBM e he dted

    00/199 or m of 89900,000/- arg N488905 d

    ao o s SK Jer ad gd y acd No BV

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    93/245

    93

    Svn a aced No.3 - B. Ay n anoher hqe ate

    10/ 0/ 99 for um o R 8,000000/ brg No.488906 ue

    vor of Nher Hrkh n ine y cus o

    n e No.3. Boh chq o eo Eiit 4

    ad 5 epevely The prouo' ce heefoe o e

    one ce No h cr rcor o how the

    mount was wrong reve m C ite t e

    cont of CBM o te or a ne o mig

    moun ak o amoun w o heqe o

    e No6 n No. 9 & 0

    62. Ae No. BV Sv armen h umit

    at he h rien oe euqe n tio o ce No.3

    B Acya who w upeio oe an he wa meel

    mpemeng e irios vn y ce No.3 A No3 on

    h or

    tke rnt ee whih

    onere

    at pproprite ge

    6 he poeuo ebie a o aec reg

    w w kp y CBM xhi0 a ee rgr

    e of cc No BR Ay o 0 h n 2

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    94/245

    4

    Ocb 1 w brugh on rcrd 052 cvly

    Ts ws show sablh h ccd No.3 - .L Achya w n

    Mub bu h w a Bgalr f ocl du T docun

    n bugh on rcd by PW. Th ns rspc f

    ndanc o acusd N B Srivasn woud show ha h was

    prsn on 0h h d 12 Ocobr, ad hs s

    kd hbi 0(3) cllcvy. Ts w show abh

    ha acsd No. w pn on h said das.

    64 ordr o sbsh ha aun was ac, dpsid in

    h ccoun f s Nbhra Hrakchd h prn xid

    PW 8 Mr Muksh Johi Ehbi44). P.W has d s

    Nrbhr Harakhad was havg accoun wh Bak f Ida

    Sck ng Banh ad a , accusd No. - K Prh

    d accusd No 0 - Naandra Parh wr h parnrs. H has

    sad a h usd ppa chqus pr srcs of ccsd

    No Kan Pakh. h dai wr al giv b fr

    prpaaon of chqs and h usd o gv araion f h

    acos. I rspc o chqus cd ohr pas h

    sd o b dpsid ccn h Bak o Inda, Sok

    hag Brnch by P.W. 8 ohr s bs. H has sad

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    95/245

    95

    a hqe N.88906 dad 10/10/99 f R 8,3000,000/- sd

    v f M/ Nbhra Hrca ignd by h acsed

    N11 B.V Sva nd asd N3 BI Achya f CBMF and

    chqu wich at Ebit- 15 w depid t acnt f he

    eng aount N 1400 T ws deoitd by f cd

    sip r a s 86,0450/ ad h vr id f he

    edit p i nind Caa B Cheq at E- f ant 83000000/- d secnd heque N.48891 fr R

    260640. h credit s hs b id at Exibt-1 The

    scutin ha thfre ealihd t e chequ wch wa t

    e rmd bac C wa fac, md t accd Ns

    ad 10 h parrs f M Narbherm Hakhnd y eqe

    wh at Ext15 wich wa nd y accsd N.1 - BV

    Siasan and accsed N3 - BR. ya. Tis dit sip as en

    ug n rcrd by PW 0 D Jaghnda Ueganwa.

    W. 10

    rght n rcd Ebi1 ad 113(1) wh

    fle:ed he d nt rsp cdt sp B f d ded

    0//991 f m f R 85606,0/ he stent f ac

    f s Ne Har arg acn N1400

    03/10/991 31/10/1991 B f Ind Sk Ehge

    B

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    96/245

    96

    Aer he s mu ws ve ccse N. 0

    Nancanra rkh sse cheqe k ni arin

    N577597 e 0/0/99 fr R 8200000/ r f S

    Jv - acce N6. Ts ce ws sgn by aus N0

    Navchnr a. s che E- 2 The rsecn

    h s sbshe n he sam y, : r rev

    8000000/ accus N.0 mi mun R

    8200000/ accs N - SK vr A h saemen f

    n a Exbi an (2) sws accry bi eny

    was me fe e paymn R 2500000/- h aun s

    Narbheram Hkn Prsecun se eere e

    acse N0 - Nananr r uz amn f R

    8000000/ ch ws igay reci m na Bk hg

    ee ws n el rcn re any securiy much less

    purhas sal 4 NCO. he acun Narbhera

    Hrkhn wch is p bala a n

    0/0/99 ws 444828 n sg balnce n h

    w R 622286 hes es ae exi Exhbs

    an (4 svey

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    97/245

    97

    66. Out o t ohr h for 179 cros wch was cv y

    BM, again acs No.3 - BR. Achaya an accs No11 B.V

    Srvaan ssu hqu bag No88905 at 10/10/1991 for a

    sm of 89900000/ vor of Ms SK Jhavri wh

    sig by boh h acus an wh is at xbt 4 Ti h

    wa osit by acc No.6 - S. Jvri in hs account No19186

    wi Bak of ni, Soc xang Brc Mmba by pay-nsp o

    Bak o Ina on _sm t. h ay-sp bn brough o

    rcor by W 1 - Mr Kshor Mahao Ajgokr a at Ei

    1 7 an t am an a of chq at ibi-14 lly wh th

    ay-si a Ehibit117 roscion brought on rcor h

    statmn of accnt of accs No.6 S.K. avri barg accon

    No.1986 wh Ban of na, Sto xchng Brnch, Mmbai a

    statmn s at Eit15 a th rvat ny rspct of

    m of 8,99,00000/ at 10/10/1991 s mar a Eit

    151) Frt posction h bugh on rcor a ch

    barg No370306 ss by accu No6 - SK havr at

    09/10/99 r Rs 4,765,3/- i vor o Sto xng

    ar Hous which s a Ehbt-1 16. con cas ta th

    opin baanc of h sai accont w 9,1,8660097 which i at

    it 115 an h hq avo o Stoc xcng arng

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    98/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    99/245

    99

    Detment and tey were e pesons wo were onudg te deal

    on be of Caa. Ased No2 - N Balrma made n

    enty daed 22/10/1 991 n e Deaers Pd o Cna, Bangaloe

    egrdg the urhe o 12 res 14o NCD om Muua Fund atR

    100/- R 12 res and alo menoned IBA No325 1 i e

    Del Pad Th was to ndate h n amount of R 2 oe wa

    emted y BA No321 1 on nra Bak Tmrd L Bc,

    Muma PW. 6 - AK Ki oved he ad doumet and i mked

    Et-6 he Deal ad s e d g of accused No2 - N

    Blrmana oseto se tt ae e deal w

    coluded ene would e made he Sauda Book d n ae

    wee deal wh wee not onuded o ene we made the

    Sauda Boo PW 6 h aed t the Sada Book at Ext 60

    cy dd not onta any enty regard o ansaon dated

    210/199 r R 12 es

    68 he payme or ese ps wod e mde by gvg

    uon on eeone to a Bak Bn, Muma wo e

    red o mke ayent on eha of Ca When uh

    trucio wee gven to a Bak Ban in Mma he Cie

    Dee wod ge ion on teehone and he used to ovey on

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    100/245

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    101/245

    0

    No.26645 maintaied y Caa wit Can Bak Cnngham

    Road Branch, Bagalore nd it a Ei-62, wic indited ta

    the ceqe deposd wit anar Bak Cnm oad

    Bh Bgoe

    70. P.W.2 evdee hs sted t e credit slp wod e

    prepared he Back-p Deprtme of C Bglore o te sof the cheque a Et-25 and his was submted to Cra Bank

    Bc at Bangaoe w A o3215 The amount thefor, ofR

    12 rores oly emitted y Cana to te credi of CBMF

    Ts credt sp edp y .W2 en exited Eiit-26

    rosection cse is at n te was o dea y Caa wth

    CBMF for tns of 12 roes.

    71. W. in i evidence as sated ta e asr of moey fm

    o Bch to aoer Bnc was mde by a tlegrapictfe or

    y ma tsfr He staed tat o reevg the messag o

    teephoe om the Head Oe Caaa Bk amarid Le Bch

    Mmi prpad redit adve dated 22/10/991 of Canra Bak

    auhorzg cedt of 2 ores to aot No314 CBMF Ca.

    O ts rdit advise M Mani ad pt s initials Tis edit advse

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    102/245

    12

    a Exbit ( Tis bi shows a an aoun of R 2 roes

    was eded o the accoun No.39 of Cango T saeme

    o on was maked fo idenifcaion by he Invesgag

    Ofce PW9 d s son s 8( o X8()

    72. So as b abisd by prosecuton t e mone

    C o ba Ml F CBMF). Ae he

    ou eved by M ode o esabsh wa appened

    eee, e poseuio s emed PW 9 Rai iai of

    e CBM Mub. He hs saed is evence ta e nds

    which wee emtted o CBMF were he fo of IBAd i was used

    be oveyed o eepoe by ny oic om C Bagoe

    He se e pys IB of he same um used to

    ome o Ca Bgloe He s sd a ae pesig IBA

    ey ed o ea au n of ds o Ca Bgoe

    Bak Tmad Le Ban Depending upont scheme to

    wh was ddssed i woud e foded o e d ds fo

    eecing cdi i ds (Scemes) acco. H has fuer sed t

    tee as exeso oe of Ca Bak M isef (ps

    supplied).

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    103/245

    03

    73. PW 9 brought o eod E- 104 wih he oce

    py of he leer daed 22/0/99 of Canak Mal Fd

    addressd o he Mger Canara Bk, Tamard Lae, Bomay

    Slly Canak Mual ud also has addressed a ler o he

    Mager Bak or Mke daed 25/0/99 elosig IBA

    No32 daed 22/0/99 r a or R 200,00000/- he

    d lete a Eb-03. h

    at e aun of R1

    0w

    w

    rm

    it

    f

    m

    Cana was byCBM. He ha rer ed t he voucher

    dated 22/0/99 pepaed n he hdwg o oe M Rajesh

    Pwa ad coed poo; he uppe poro de

    poro d e ower poo was red poo and elow he

    gnatre o Mr ajesh awar PW 9 sged se he

    heked He as sted hat accued No PJ Subaao ad

    sgned e vouhe o appovl s de vouhe a

    Exh-02 PW9 rher saed he de poo o he

    vouhe enoned ha he out o 2 res wogly

    reeved o na' Aou. He ha he aed a red

    poo o he douen however showed ha n ot o R 2

    ore was pd o SK Jhave vde heqe No8737 per he

    to o Caa Bagaloe He her saed , n

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    104/245

    1

    norma couse he amont was gly rive by CBM on

    accon of Caigo's Cen nt it wol ave een emitted

    ak to Cafa. However, in he pesent se tea of reming he

    aoun o Caa the aon wa pai to SK Javeri y ceqe

    No.587347 He fuher state he not persony kow SK.

    aver hough he was one of the okers eag with CBM. The

    evence of wiss esshes t hogh in he reco of CBMhe amont was wrongly rceve y CBM tea of remtg bak

    the ai amount te money paid SK Jhaveri voche at

    Ehit 02 was signe y accue No.4 PJ. Suaro

    4 W - Timai as e state t one ay ee

    e asaction ie on 2 M B Acarya - accs No3

    ake to pepae a heqe or 2 croes ourg S.K

    ave He has s hat ere the cheqe was prepare he has

    ke B Aaya e eason why te cheque wa to e pepae n

    our of Javeri. He h stte hat BR chaa tol that he

    shou pepae he heque an g it to m an theeafte he

    wol io aou the natue of aactn He st tht

    te cheque was prpare y m an gne i an sice he cheque

    a e signe y one mo signaty he took the eqe to

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    105/245

    5

    Na and when e did so e was aked by about he atue

    of tasacon involved. PW 9 has ten sated at e iomed

    wat tod t by M Ay d, erefe A Narcha

    o sged te eque He en ook ceque to BR Aya Te

    eque n e andwritg o ajes Pw P.W. 9 s e

    stated at toug e ceque pepred o 21st te dte on e

    eque was put as 22/10/199 Te eue at t-78 PW9

    eeoe esbed a te eue peped at e

    tace o ccused No3 BR Aharya

    5 P.W9 s te stted tat on 22/10/199 cued No4 PJ

    Subbao iormed PW9 tat a amunt o 2 s ad been

    eeived om C Bangoe toug IBA d it was met

    Cgo Sceme PW 9 e sated tat te commo

    attedane Regte was kept o oces ad saff y CBMF

    egte o te mon o Otobe 99 boug on ecod at

    E10 d n wic it mentoned tat on 22/10/1991

    oce v M . Ased No.3 M P Subbarao

    accused No4 nd M Al Naiaa wee pesent t h bee

    estbsed by e psecuon t he aued No6 S.K. vei nd

    ccused No7 - Pav Set ad ot Accout beag

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    106/245

    N.0478601 Bk Aeca Mb.

    76. PW. 8 - Mr. Prnab Ray a tated n edence that e wa

    wrkg he Acut Deparent Bak Aer ad tht e

    ceuqe daed 22/10/191 Canara Bnk earing N.587347 r a

    f 2 re w ued in ur .K. Jhaer at Exbt-78

    ws deposted i he Jont Acout No04786011

    acued N 6

    S ae d acued N7 - Pala Seth wc acct

    itied i the Bak Aerca Mub PW8 h tated tt

    e ceqe depted by y paynlp Bk

    Aeria dated 22/0/99 f a u f 2 re in epect

    heque beaig 58734 7 t the credt he Jt Accunt M/

    S.K Jhavernd PalvSeth. Te pin-slp had been exted at h

    ace d t at 79 ad the cheque wih w deited

    h been mrked at Exht-78.

    77 PW8 h ther ted n eene that he peng bce

    in e d Acnt 220.199 wa 1578947223 nd

    e e eque w credted he accun, the aun ued

    r kng payent t Mr. R Bhra e ceque dated 2/10/1991

    r 5937000/- Te ad ceque a recd at t-80

  • 8/9/2019 Ketan Parekh 1992 Stock Scam Judgement Special Court Mumbai

    107/245

    1

    He sed e ner ceqe f e sme de r

    111786/ ws sed by ccsed N6 S ve n v f

    Bn f nd /c BO Ml Fnd e sd cee s

    81. ner cee ded 1/1991 fr 9/

    w sed by ccsed N6 S ver n vr f B nd

    /c. BOI Ml Fnd dwn n Bn merc. cee s s

    bg n recrd b8. ner cee 83 f e

    sme de f 63/ ed by Sre Jver ccsed N6

    vr rm d l brg n crd. PW. 8 s

    rg n recrd w me cee 8 nd 8

    ssed by ccsed N 6 Sre ver f