kentucky hsr development: building partnerships margaret m. love, ph.d. university of kentucky...
TRANSCRIPT
Kentucky HSR Development:
Building Partnerships
Margaret M. Love, Ph.D. University of Kentucky
Family & Community Medicine (Medicine)Health Behavior (Public Health)
Infrastructure Development Aims
Improve ability of faculty to develop proposals and publish papers in health services research (HSR)
Promote collaboration of physicians with other health services researchers
Cultivate research ideas from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN) into research designs and fundable proposals
University of Kentucky BRIC
Overarching structure = collaboration College of Public Health (subsumed Center for
Health Services Management & Research) 2001-2003 PI Beaulieu/Fleming (BRIC I) 2003-2006 PI Fleming (BRIC II)
Department of Family and Community Medicine (DFCM) 2001-2006 Co-PI Love
University of Kentucky BRIC
Premises of today’s talk: Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) can
respond to community needs… and partnerships are at the core of PBRN activities
Learning collaboratives can improve health care quality
Through its support of partnerships, BRIC built HSR capacity in Kentucky
University of Kentucky BRIC
Two examples of building & leveraging partnerships – processes of engagement BRIC involvement with the Kentucky Ambulatory
Network (KAN) BRIC I Prevention Research Project BRIC II Small Research Projects
BRIC involvement with the University of Kentucky’s participation in the Academic Chronic Care Collaborative (ACCC)
Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)
PBRNs are groups of primary care clinicians and practices working together to answer community-based health care questions and translate research findings into practice.
PBRNs engage clinicians in quality improvement activities and an evidence-based culture in primary care practice to improve the health of all Americans.
http://pbrn.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt
Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)
Model for university-community partnership for health services research
Potential to improve quality of care Implement and study process of adoption and
outcomes in primary care practice Respond to community
“Inside-out” vs. “outside-in” models I.e., “Top down” vs. “bottom up” “Bedside to bench” not just “Bench to bedside”
Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN)
Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN) Statewide primary care practice-based research
network founded in 2000 More than 200 community-based clinicians
80% are family physicians ~75% practice in rural, medically underserved areas
KAN has practices in 31 of KY’s 51 Appalachian counties
BRIC I: Prevention Research Project
Planned with/for KAN Solicited feedback from community-based PCPs
about topics of prevention & intervention features Break-out sessions at annual meeting E.g., Wanted an intervention with evidence for high
likelihood of success, i.e., not obesity Involved community-based FP as consultant
Final planning input to focus on FOBT colorectal cancer screening (surprised own rates so low!)
Assumed leadership role when joined faculty
BRIC I: Prevention Research Project
Conducted pilot project in 6 KAN practices Multiple strategies to increase FOBT rates E.g., chart stickers, information about billing
BRIC I: Prevention Research Project
Outcomes included lessons learned by FP leader: Difficulties in abstracting screening rates from
billing data Usefulness of RA assistance in scheduling and
preparing for orientation visits Necessity of ongoing contact with practice to
assure fidelity to intervention, complete documentation, and access to outcomes data
BRIC I: Prevention Research Project
Lessons learned by BRIC team Discussion with KAN members led to principles
guiding QI focus It takes a team
Outcomes Directly: MPH Capstone for FP leader Possibly contributed to track record or
experience: Future KAN involvement in federally funded CRC screening research
BRIC II Small Research Projects:Physician “Collaborator” Model
The “real” world for tenure track academic family physicians (FPs): Most can devote only 10 – 25% time to research Many will not become independent researchers Many can become physician “collaborators”
Make substantial contributions to HSR led by faculty in other departments
BRIC II Small Research Projects
Junior FPs partnered with experienced health services researchers (HSRers) HSRers nominated 7 projects in own areas of
expertise and interest 3 FPs nominated selves FPs to transition from co-I to PI FPs 20% protected research time (1/2 in-kind) HSRers paid protected time (10%-20%)
Additional Support for BRIC II Small Research Partnerships
More training for FPs Capacity-building seminars
Professional writing workshops HSR methods seminars
Development of Grant Applications National HSR meetings (AcademyHealth)
Additional Support for BRIC II Small Research Partnerships
BRIC PI (Fleming) & Co-I (Love) Co-investigators on projects Facilitated partnerships
E.g., sounding board for HSR mentors E.g., nudge for FPs
Served as program mentors/coaches for FPs Overall grant administration
BRIC II Small Research Projects
3 projects/teams: Killip/Ireson (3 years) – Patient safety in after-
hours telephone medicine Joyce/Wackerbarth (2 years) – Colorectal cancer
screening decision-making Dassow/Costich (1 year) – Generic drug
utilization (became study of Medicare Part D)
BRIC II Small Research Projects
Relationship to KAN: Patient safety in after-hours telephone medicine
Designed for/conducted in residency practice Next step was funded pilot in community practices
Colorectal cancer screening decision-making Designed as KAN study
Generic drug utilization (Medicare Part D) Involved KAN input & feasibility testing
BRIC II Small Research Projects: Pt Safety / Telephone Med
Initiative from UKy or Community? Initiative stayed “inside” academia
Outcomes FP came to “own” this topic as research program FP acquired qualitative & quantitative research skills Multiple national/international research presentations 1 pub (so far) with FP as 1st author FP as PI earned NPSF grant Also… Because of process analysis, changed steps in
residency’s after-hours telephone medicine (e.g., messages in charts) – good example of QI
BRIC II Small Research Projects: CRC Screening Decision-Making
Initiative from UKy or Community? Idea originated “inside” academia However, by design, study solicited input from
community on what is needed to design decision-supports Qualitative research with FPs & patients leading to
identification of “barriers” and “facilitators” for CRC screening
Next steps would be design of decision supports & engaging FPs to test them
BRIC II Small Research Projects: CRC Screening Decision-Making
Outcomes 2 pubs with HSRer as 1st author FP acquired qualitative research skills
Co-Investigator on federally funded research project(s) led by other UK qualitative researchers
PI on own federally funded education grants Could apply skills to evaluation of patient-centered
care curriculum FP tenured as Associate Professor
BRIC II Small Research Projects: Generic Drugs Medicare Part D
Initiative from UKy or Community? That’s a long story…evolution in terms of what’s
meaningful and what’s feasible Initial plan: In KAN, evaluate barriers to
prescribing generic drugs Reaction of KAN advisory committee members
suggested more comprehensive approach necessary to capture prescribing issues that matter
Continued…
BRIC II Small Research Projects: Generic Drugs Medicare Part D
Coincided with Medicare Part D implementation Alternative Approach:
Chart review in KAN practices to determine if prescribing practices changed following Medicare Part D coverage
Initial chart reviews showed charts don’t contain needed info
Continued…
BRIC II Small Research Projects: Generic Drugs Medicare Part D
Final Approach Survey assessing physician experiences and opinions
regarding Medicare Part D Conducted during Continuing Education programs for
family physicians held in Lexington, KY (attendees from many states)
In sum, iterative process informed by KAN community-based members & feasibility pretesting in KAN
BRIC II Small Research Projects: Generic Drugs Medicare Part D
Outcomes Completed survey with 98 responses Analyses completed; manuscript in progress FP tenured as Associate Professor
BRIC II Small Research Projects: Overall Outcomes
FP transition into leadership role One effectively transitioned into leadership role
(with coaching) One maintained a co-investigator role One already had more research experience
Did HSRers develop, too? Better at working with FPs? & with KAN?
E.g., structuring FP input & managing logistics? E.g., involving KAN input & evaluating feasibility?
BRIC meets ACCC
Academic Chronic Care Collaborative (ACCC) American Association of Medical Colleges
(AAMC) Consortium designed to develop quality
improvement programs of clinical care, evaluation, & research
University of Kentucky & Department of Family and Community Medicine selected as one of 23 academic health centers
BRIC meets ACCC
Features of University of Kentucky initiative Diabetes as clinical target in the Family Medical
Center Chronic Care Model with quality improvement
cycles Implemented group visits
BRIC meets ACCC
To supplement College of Medicine funding, BRIC provided resources to support systematic evaluation and research Half year RA assistance in creating, entering and
managing the Family Medical Center’s Diabetes Registry
Trial period of registry software Junior FP travel to national QI meeting
BRIC meets ACCC
Outcomes Multi-year database of over 600 DM patients Doctor of Nurse Practitioner (DNP) thesis 2 Masters of Public Health (MPH) capstone
projects Draft manuscript under development
3rd MPH capstone underway (for junior FP) Medical student summer research project
BRIC meets ACCC
Outcomes Greater sophistication across the department in
evaluating quality improvement processes Collaboration with “non-BRIC” faculty members in
Public Health and Pharmacy Department struggles with how to maintain
database Ongoing systematic evaluation of QI elusive
BRIC II – What (Seemed to) Work
Leadership from experienced HSRers invaluable in the small research project partnerships Specialized set of topic-relevant skills and
knowledge Project management
How to get started & what to do next Breaking the project down into steps
Establishing – and pressing – project timeline Relationships important to FP growth
BRIC II – Facilitators
Flexibility built into the multi-year BRIC II award enabled research partners to adapt (e.g., Medicare Part D) In future, solicit KAN input prior to submitting
grant application or as a development phase within a funded application; but would depend on time, resources, & FOA
BRIC II – What (Seemed to) Work
Support for Partnerships PI & Co-PI helped Small Research Project
partners work together HSRers had to “chase” FP Fellows; PI & Co-PI helped
catch them (but also needed to know when to get out of the way)
Co-PI facilitated partnerships with KAN PI facilitated partnerships with HSRers
BRIC II – Lessons Learning
Might more HSRer & PI/CoPI direction increase “scholarly productivity” UKy ACCC? Note: Actual research using data has been
conducted by professional degree candidates with significant mentorship outside our department
Do we need to facilitate FP partnering with HSR mentors?
How can we bridge QI processes and typical scholarly productivity?
BRIC II – What (Seemed to) Work
25% protected time needed for junior FP to channel time & attention toward research and developing own capacity E.g., Dedicated day away from the office &
connection to a national grant-writing program helped SK protect time
BRIC II – Lessons Learning
It’s OK to let success overtake you Genesis of College of Public Health
Center for Health Services Mgt & Research then School of Public Health then College
NIH Clinical & Translational Science Awards (CTSA) University-wide restructuring to support formation of
Center for Clinical and Translational Science DFCM & KAN leadership in outreach core function
BRIC II – Lessons Learned
Would have been helpful to have continued “BRIC Brass” from BRIC I Advisory group of Chair & Academic Vice Chair of
Fam & Comm Med, and Director of Center for Health Services Management and Research (later Director of School of Public Health)
To promote knowledge of faculty activities, buy-in and support of program, and view to “bigger picture” of university, community, U.S.
Implications for Health Reform
Overall, in both KAN (PBRN) and ACCC (or other health care collaboratives), the physicians and their practices are part of the solution, that is, for improving health care and health outcomes.
Implications for Health Reform
As primary care plays a central role PBRNs can link AHCs & communities to
implement & evaluate programmatic change and quality improvement processes
PBRNs can help inform policy makers of barriers & facilitators to better design systems that work
PBRNs reach diverse communities and can represent diverse types of practice
Implications for Health Reform
Based on our experience in Kentucky, layers of specific types of support can build or leverage academic-community partnerships Expert HSRers from multiple disciplines Primary care physicians trained as research
collaborators Collaborative teams Facilitators (people who help with teamwork)
Implications for Health Reform
However… Quality improvement processes require ongoing,
rapid evaluation E.g., Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)
This is not like traditional interventional research models in geological time
Similarities to traditional research Systematic evaluation of impact Evidence based change strategies
Implications for Health Reform
Both practice-based research and QI cycles take many university researchers outside their “comfort zone” Less controlled circumstances Participants can benefit from the research (not
just for the greater good in the future)
Implications for Health Reform
Special expertise in PBR & QI needed HSRers may want retraining to capture rapid
healthcare change Physician faculty may need HSR training/experience Facilitated partnerships enable “on-the-job” training Funding for partnership development could enable
new “players” in federally funded research New institutions New disciplines
UKy BRIC Faculty
Family & Comm Medicine Mel Bennett MD MPH Paul Dassow MD MSPH Robert Hosey MD Jennifer Joyce MD Shersten Killip MD MPH Michael King MD Margaret Love PhD (Co-PI) Samuel Matheny MD MPH Kevin Pearce MD MPH Steve Wrightson MD
College of Public Health Joyce Beaulieu PhD (1st PI) Julia Costich PhD JD Carol Ireson PhD Steve Fleming PhD (2nd PI) F. Douglas Scutchfield MD Sarah Wackerbarth PhD
And thanks to AHRQ… Kay Anderson, PhD P20 HS-011845 R24 HS-011845