kansas mlc-3 evaluation: what have we learned so far?
DESCRIPTION
Kansas MLC-3 Evaluation: What Have We Learned So Far?. Tatiana Lin, M.A., Kansas Health Institute Ruth Wetta -Hall, Ph.D., KUMC-Wichita Kansas Public Health Conference September 20, 2011. Overview. Kansas MLC learning models Goals MLC-2 vs. MLC-3 Results at Glance - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Kansas MLC-3 Evaluation: What Have We Learned So
Far?
Kansas MLC-3 Evaluation: What Have We Learned So
Far?
Tatiana Lin, M.A., Kansas Health Institute
Ruth Wetta -Hall, Ph.D., KUMC-Wichita
Kansas Public Health Conference
September 20, 2011
OverviewOverview
Kansas MLC learning models Goals MLC-2 vs. MLC-3 Results at Glance
A Review of the Evaluation What did we learn? How can we use our findings to move
forward?
MLC GoalsMLC Goals
To promote the application of QI methods
Prepare for and contribute to national accreditation
MLC-2MLC-2West Central
RegionalQI Project
Immunizations
West Central RegionalQI Project
Immunizations
East Central RegionalQI Project
MCH
East Central RegionalQI Project
MCH
Wildcat RegionalQI Project
Oral Health
Region 1
Region 2
Region3
KDHETeam
1
2
KDHETeam
MLC-3
1 Year Grant 3 Year Grant
Project Differences
3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
Kansas Multi-State Learning Collaborative -2
Kansas Multi-State Learning Collaborative -2
Regional QI training model
Learn
ing
Mo
del
Learn
ing
Mo
del
QI Training
PHF experts
2 day workshop
2 participantsfrom 15 Kansas PH Regions
RegionalPilot Projects
Kansas Multi-State Learning Collaborative -3
Kansas Multi-State Learning Collaborative -3
Learn
ing
Mo
del
Learn
ing
Mo
del
Team Leader
Training
Results at First Glance Results at First Glance
Extent of training and participation 10 regions, 64 counties covering 89% of population
Peer-to-peer model – at least 50% of time in learningSessions
Expansion of concept of regional approach
Results from the MLC Evaluation
Information for policy makers. Health for Kansans.Information for policy makers. Health for Kansans.
Kansas Health InstituteKansas Health Institute