k-2 data collection

33
Students are formally assessed by teachers 5 times each year (BOY, Oct., Jan., March, EOY). Data is submitted at the end of each quarter. Data reports are shared with principals quarterly (school and county). K-2 Data Collection

Upload: yetta

Post on 21-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

K-2 Data Collection. Students are formally assessed by teachers 5 times each year (BOY, Oct., Jan., March, EOY). Data is submitted at the end of each quarter. Data reports are shared with principals quarterly (school and county). Students Meeting EOY Benchmark. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: K-2 Data Collection

Students are formally assessed by teachers 5 times each year (BOY, Oct., Jan., March, EOY).

Data is submitted at the end of each quarter.

Data reports are shared with principals quarterly (school and county).

K-2 Data Collection

Page 2: K-2 Data Collection

Kindergarten First Grade Second Grade

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011-20122012-2013

Students Meeting EOY Benchmark

Page 3: K-2 Data Collection

Students Needing Intense Intervention

Kindergarten First Grade Second Grade 0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2011-20122012-2013

Page 4: K-2 Data Collection

Quarterly Trends

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 40%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

KindergartenFirst GradeSecond Grade

Page 5: K-2 Data Collection

Middle School Common Exams

August 29, 2013

Page 6: K-2 Data Collection

Middle Grades Common Exam Results2012-2013

Grade Common Exam

Overall Percent Correct

Number of Items

6 Science 53.53% 29MC3 CR

7 Science 57.67% 30 MC3 CR

6 Social Studies

49.09% 26 MC3CR

7 Social Studies

50.27% 26 MC3CR

8 Social Studies

50.42% 26 MC3 CR

Page 7: K-2 Data Collection

Opportunities to Grow Utilize school and district PLT’s to share best

practices More detailed pacing guides for Social

Studies and Science On going professional development on

Social Studies and Science content, writing and lesson planning

Utilize more information on Common Exams from DPI

Page 8: K-2 Data Collection

ENGLISH/LANGUAGE ARTS

Course % of Questions Answered Correctly

ELA I 53.2%ELA III 52.2%ELA IV 58.2%

Page 9: K-2 Data Collection

MATHCOURSE % of Questions

Answered Correctly

Advanced Functions and Modeling 35.1%Common Core Geometry 32.6%Common Core Algebra II 30.8%Pre-Calculus

40.5%

Page 10: K-2 Data Collection

SCIENCE

Course % of Questions Answered Correctly

Earth/Environ. Science 56.6%Physical Science 53.9%Chemistry 62.1%

Page 11: K-2 Data Collection

SOCIAL STUDIES

Course % of Questions Answered Correctly

Civics & Economics

62.4%US History

66.1%World History 45.1%

Page 12: K-2 Data Collection

Harnett County SchoolsCareer & Technical Education

District Meeting

Harnett County Schools

Career & Technical Education

Page 13: K-2 Data Collection

Celebrations North Carolina’s Graduation Rate for

CTE Concentrators is 94%. (2011-2012)

Harnett County’s Graduation Rate for CTE Concentrators is 89.4%. (2011-2012)

1,454 Workplace Credentials were earned by Harnett County High School students in 2012-2013.

Page 14: K-2 Data Collection

Certifications

& Credentials

Earned in

Harnett County

Microsoft Office Word/Expert Microsoft Office Excel/Expert Microsoft Office Power Point Microsoft Office Access CPR Fire Technology Modules First Aide Nurse Aide NCCER Modules (Carpentry, Masonry, &

Electrical) NIMS Measurement, Materials, and Safety ServSafe WorkKeys

Page 15: K-2 Data Collection

CTE Post-Assessment Trend

Data

Page 16: K-2 Data Collection

CTE Post-Assessment Data for 2012-2013

School Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Overall

Harnett Central

83.8% 86.9% 85.4%

Triton 79.4% 85.1% 82.2%

Overhills 82.8% 83.8% 83.3%

Star Academy 40.0% 30.0% 35%

Western Harnett

78.1% 72.3% 75.2%

District’s Overall Performance for 81.5%

Page 17: K-2 Data Collection

CTE Secondary Placement Trend Data

Page 18: K-2 Data Collection

Increase the numbers of job shadowing experiences, internships, and apprenticeships across the district.

Increase the number of articulated credits, community college credits, certifications, and credentials earned across the district.

Increase Technical Attainment

Increase Secondary Placement of our graduates

• Increase the district’s graduation rate

Moving Forward in CTE

Page 19: K-2 Data Collection

• “Pathways to Prosperity”• Charts the course for CTE

Our Vision is Simple

Page 20: K-2 Data Collection

Harnett County Schools 2012-2013 Graduation Cohort

Presentation to the Board of Education

August 29, 2013

Sharon M. GaineyLEA Test Coordinator

Page 21: K-2 Data Collection

The Who, When, and What about

Harnett County Schools 2012-2013 Graduation Cohort

Rate

Page 22: K-2 Data Collection

Data Report required by the NCDPI to satisfy the NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Bill

4-Year Cohort**** (students who finish all State requirements within four years)

5-Year Cohort (students who finish all State requirements within five years)

A system that requires schools to track students progress through their senior year

What is Graduation Cohort?

Page 23: K-2 Data Collection

Students who were enrolled in the 8th grade for the first time in 2008

Students who were enrolled in the 9th grade on the 20th day of school in 2009-2010

Students who transferred in to our schools and were on track to graduate within four years

It is not based solely on the number of seniors who receive a diploma on graduation day/night

Who is Included in the Cohort?

Page 24: K-2 Data Collection

In late January, early February, the NCDPI sends (electronically) the LEA Test Coordinator a list of students who, according to their records, are a part of Harnett County Schools graduation cohort based on the data in their system

The information is shared with the school counselors and the search begins. If students on the list are not currently enrolled in school, we search for them in the following ways:◦ Counselor school records◦ Facebook◦ My Space◦ Spokeo◦ Judicial System◦ The NCDPI Search System

What is the Process to Complete the Graduation Report?

Page 25: K-2 Data Collection

Students who dropped out of school Students who transferred to a community

college Students enrolled in the OCS (Occupational

Course of Study Program) they can remain in school until they are 22

Students who will not graduate within the four year period-if they graduate in summer school or the next year, they count toward our five year cohort rate.

Which Students Count Against The LEA’s Graduation Cohort?

Page 26: K-2 Data Collection

The State requires an LEA to reach 80% OR increase their 4-year grad rate by 2%

from the previous year

Harnett County increased the 4-year cohort graduation rate by 2.6% for 2012-2013 compared to 2011-2012!

Harnett County increased the 5-year cohort graduation rate by .5% for 2012-2013 compared to 2011-2012!

Where Does Harnett County Rate with the Graduation Cohort?

Page 27: K-2 Data Collection

Triton High School led Harnett County with the highest 4-year graduation rate of 82% for 2012-2013! This was an increase of 5.9% from 2011-2012’s 76.1% rate!

Go Hawks!

Overhills High School led Harnett County with the largest 4-year graduation rate increase for 2012-2013! They increased 6.2% from 2011-2012’s 72.5% rate!

Go Jaguars!

Where Does Harnett County Rate with the Graduation

Cohort? (continued)

Page 28: K-2 Data Collection

Harnett County Schools 5-Year Cohort Rate

2012-2013 2011-2012

LEA-77.9%◦HCHS-85.6% 5.2% Increase

◦OHS-77.3% 4.8% Increase

◦THS-78.2%◦WHHS-81.1%

LEA-77.4%◦HCHS-80.4%

◦OHS-72.5%

◦THS-82.1%◦WHHS-81.3%

Page 29: K-2 Data Collection

Documentation is Required to Remove Students from the Data Report

Students who withdrew for homeschooling Students who transferred to another public

LEA in or out of state Students who transferred to a private school Students who are deceased Students who transitioned to a correctional

institution

Which Students Don’t Count Against the LEA?

Page 30: K-2 Data Collection

Harnett County Schools 4-Year Graduation Cohort

2012-2013 2011-2012

Subgroup Denominator Numerator Percent

All Students 1478 1139 77.1

Male 762 536 70.3

Female 716 603 84.2

American Indian 13 9 69.2

Asian * * *

Black 441 336 76.2

Hispanic 196 143 73.0

Two or More Races

48 40 83.3

White 775 606 78.2

Economically Disadvantaged

694 498 71.8

Limited English Proficient

36 14 38.9

Students With Disabilities

143 79 55.2

Academically Gifted

142 - >95

Subgroup Denominator Numerator Percent

All Students 1407 1048 74.5

Male 720 503 69.9

Female 687 545 79.3

American Indian 17 12 70.6

Asian * * *

Black 431 303 70.3

Hispanic 166 126 75.9

Two or More Races

52 44 84.6

White 734 559 76.2

Economically Disadvantaged

648 463 71.5

Limited English Proficient

37 22 59.5

Students With Disabilities

162 82 50.6

Subgroup information is based on data collected when a student is last seen in the cohort.* Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value.

The percentage is not shown if it is greater than 95 percent or less than 5 percent.

Page 31: K-2 Data Collection

Harnett County Schools Areas of Focus

2012-2013 2011-2012

Subgroup Denominator Numerator Percent

All Students 1478 1139 77.1

Male 762 536 70.3

Female 716 603 84.2

American Indian

13 9 69.2

Asian * * *

Black 441 336 76.2

Hispanic 196 143 73.0

Two or More Races

48 40 83.3

White 775 606 78.2

Economically Disadvantaged

694 498 71.8

Limited English

Proficient36 14 38.9

Students With Disabilities

143 79 55.2

Academically Gifted

142 - >95

Subgroup Denominator Numerator Percent

All Students 1407 1048 74.5

Male 720 503 69.9

Female 687 545 79.3

American Indian

17 12 70.6

Asian * * *

Black 431 303 70.3

Hispanic 166 126 75.9

Two or More Races

52 44 84.6

White 734 559 76.2

Economically Disadvantaged

648 463 71.5

Limited English

Proficient37 22 59.5

Students With Disabilities

162 82 50.6

Subgroup information is based on data collected when a student is last seen in the cohort.* Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value.

The percentage is not shown if it is greater than 95 percent or less than 5 percent.

Page 32: K-2 Data Collection

Harnett County Schools Areas of Achievement!

2012-2013 2011-2012

Subgroup Denominator Numerator Percent

All Students 1478 1139 77.1

Male 762 536 70.3

Female 716 603 84.2

American Indian 13 9 69.2

Asian * * *

Black 441 336 76.2

Hispanic 196 143 73.0

Two or More Races

48 40 83.3

White 775 606 78.2

Economically Disadvantaged

694 498 71.8

Limited English Proficient

36 14 38.9

Students With Disabilities

143 79 55.2

Academically Gifted

142 - >95

Subgroup Denominator Numerator Percent

All Students 1407 1048 74.5

Male 720 503 69.9

Female 687 545 79.3

American Indian 17 12 70.6

Asian * * *

Black 431 303 70.3

Hispanic 166 126 75.9

Two or More Races

52 44 84.6

White 734 559 76.2

Economically Disadvantaged

648 463 71.5

Limited English Proficient

37 22 59.5

Students With Disabilities

162 82 50.6

Subgroup information is based on data collected when a student is last seen in the cohort.* Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value.

The percentage is not shown if it is greater than 95 percent or less than 5 percent.

Page 33: K-2 Data Collection

ACT Results “North Carolina’s average ACT score fell in 2013. In past

years when approximately 20 percent of North Carolina students selected to take the ACT, the state’s average score was higher than the national average. With a 100 percent participation rate, the state’s average composite score fell from 21.9 points (Class of 2012) to 18.7 points (Class of 2013). The national average composite score also fell from 21.1 in 2012 to 20.9 in 2013.”

Harnett County saw growth in ACT scores when we compare our 2012 11th grade students to our 2013 11th grade student results.

“Summary results from the recent assessments show that students in the Class of 2014 are likely to earn higher ACT scores than the Class of 2013.