justice unsettled- how the foreclosure docket & discontinuances prevent new yorkers from saving...

134
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 1/134 JUSTICE UNSETTLED How the Foreclosure Shadow Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers from Saving Their Homes MFY LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

Upload: paceminterris

Post on 04-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 1/134

JUSTICE

UNSETTLEDHow the Foreclosure

Shadow Docket &

 Discontinuances PreventNew Yorkers from

Saving Their Homes

MFY LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

Page 2: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 2/134

299 Broadway, New York, NY 10009 (212) 417-3700 www.mfy.org

Page 3: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 3/134

Summary of Findings and Recommendations

On August 2, 2011, MFY Legal Services, Inc. ("MFY") published  Justice Deceived: How Large Foreclosure Firms Subvert State Regulations Protecting Homeowners (“ Justice

 Deceived ”)1, an examination of New York State foreclosure law firms’ abuse of the legal processin foreclosure cases.

 Justice Deceived identified a “shadow docket” of thousands of foreclosure cases that laydormant in the court system—recently estimated by the court to be at least 25,000 cases—to thedetriment of struggling New York homeowners. This shadow docket emerged after the New

York State Unified Court System (UCS) issued a rule in October 2010 requiring that allforeclosure law firms attest to the accuracy of the legal papers they filed in court, in response tothe widely reported robo-signing scandal in the mortgage industry. Since the implementation of the rule, after a foreclosure action is filed, the foreclosure firm must file an affirmation (the “DueDiligence Affirmation”) simultaneously with its filing of the Request for Judicial Intervention(RJI).  Justice Deceived demonstrated that foreclosure law firms almost immediately stoppedfiling RJIs after issuance of the court rule. This change in practice was likely to avoid filing theDue Diligence Affirmation and having to attest to the accuracy of the foreclosure complaint.

These cases, in which complaints are filed but no RJI is filed—which would otherwise promptthe case to move forward—often linger indefinitely on the shadow docket.

Foreclosure law firms’ wholesale refusal to file the RJIs is not only a clear violation of state law, but also significantly injures homeowners who want to save their homes. Without anRJI, New York courts do not schedule court-supervised foreclosure settlement conferences.Homeowners stranded in the shadow docket—largely unrepresented by counsel—are left toattempt to negotiate mortgage loan modifications on their own. Not surprisingly, many of thesehomeowners fail. Failure is due in part to the perverse financial incentives in the industry thatenable mortgage loan servicers to make more money in fees by foreclosing than they do if a loanis modified and the home saved. Failure is also due to the delinquent interest, inspection fees,attorney’s fees and other costs heaped on top of mortgage loan balances while foreclosure casesare trapped in the shadow docket. The larger a loan balance, the more difficult it is to attain anappropriate and affordable modification.

When Justice Deceived was published in August 2011, 87% of all residential foreclosureactions filed in Brooklyn and Queens in November 2010 and March 2011 sat in this shadowdocket, blocking homeowners’ access to the settlement conference and much-neededconnections to HUD-approved housing counseling and free legal services.

Since the publication of  Justice Deceived , aspects of foreclosure landscape have changed.I F b 2012 S J B P C h l f N Y k' f l l fi h

Page 4: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 4/134

But has this changed landscape provided for a reduced shadow docket?

Unfortunately, no.

Between February and March 2012, MFY re-reviewed the November 2010 and March2011 residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens. While there has been a reduction inthe shadow docket, many homeowners are still being denied access to the settlement conference part. A re-review of the November 2010 and March 2011 residential foreclosure filings inBrooklyn and Queens reveals that 43% of cases remain in the shadow docket .

Additionally, MFY’s recent review uncovered a disturbing new development: anexcessive number of discontinuances are being filed by foreclosure law firms without providingany grounds for the discontinuance. While some discontinuances are filed when a modificationor some other settlement is reached, in the majority of cases, the discontinuance is filed prior toany settlement conference, again depriving the homeowner access to the court-supervised process. Instead, the homeowner must languish further, waiting for the foreclosure law firm tore-file the foreclosure action. This practice – filing foreclosure complaints, allowing them to

languish for a year or more, and then discontinuing them – further undermines the New York State Legislature’s intention in creating the foreclosure settlement conference in the first place:to facilitate loan modification negotiations early in the process, under the court’s guidance, inorder to avoid unnecessary foreclosures and further economic hardship.

In our experience, when a foreclosure action is filed but later discontinued withoutsettlement, a homeowner has more difficulty negotiating a loan modification than he would hadhe not been sued in the first instance. This circumstance results because the foreclosing servicer most often intends to re-file the foreclosure once it gets its paperwork in order, so internally theservicer does not transfer the file back to its department that handles foreclosures that are not inlitigation. When a homeowner whose foreclosure has been discontinued contacts his servicer todiscuss a loan modification, the servicer’s computer system shows that the file has beentransferred to outside counsel for litigation. When the homeowner then contacts the servicer’sattorney, he is told there is no active litigation and thus there exists no case to settle via a loanmodification. The cycle of dysfunction evident at so many stages of the residential mortgage-

 backed securitization process persists throughout the lifecycle of a mortgage loan, even when theservicer has voluntarily dismissed a foreclosure lawsuit. As with a case that gets stuck in theshadow docket, when a servicer dismisses a foreclosure action without settlement, a homeowner is injured by the process because as he is unable to negotiate a loan modification and the loanarrears keep building; thus when the case is re-filed, an affordable modification becomes moredifficult.

Page 5: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 5/134

Because the foreclosure law firms’ behavior has not improved since the publication of  Justice Deceived  , and because too many homeowners are mired in the shadow docket, MFY

encourages OCA to quickly adopt the following policies and practices so as to limit the damageto homeowners:

Schedule the current shadow docket backlog of foreclosure cases for settlementconferences as soon as possible, with or without the filing of an RJI.

Require that the Due Diligence Affirmation be filed at the same time as the summons andcomplaint. MFY’s recent re-review of court records underscores the primacy of this

recommendation. In addition to the fact that the shadow docket remains intolerably large,the high rate of discontinuances filed without any loan modification or other settlementindicates that the vast majority of foreclosure summons and complaints are defective. Toguarantee that the purpose of the Due Diligence Affirmation—to protect homeownersand the court system from false foreclosure filings—is not undermined, the DueDiligence Affirmation must be filed with the summons and complaint.

For those settlement conferences that the court schedules without the filing of an RJI,require that at the initial settlement conference the foreclosure law firm file the RJI withthe corresponding $95 fee prior to the second settlement conference.

To combat the foreclosure law firms' abuse of motions and stipulations seeking todiscontinue actions unilaterally, permit attorneys to appear for the limited purpose of opposing the discontinuance. Discontinuances without loan modifications are not beneficial to homeowners; indeed, MFY’s experience has proven that such discon -

tinuances greatly lessen the likelihood that homeowners will be able to save their homes.In addition to permitting limited appearances in this context, OCA should work with legalservices providers to create a pro se opposition form that homeowners can file with theassistance of the court’s pro se office, the weekly foreclosure prevention clinic, or withthe assistance of bar applicants seeking to fulfill the mandatory 50-hour  pro bono

requirement.

The New York State Legislature should amend CPLR § 8018(a)(1)(ii) to increase the

residential foreclosure filing fee surcharge from $190 to $340, raising the cost of filing aresidential foreclosure action to $550 ($210 to purchase the index number and $340 for the residential foreclosure surcharge). If OCA adopts the policies listed above, it will bear the direct economic and administrative brunt of foreclosure law firms' abusive practices, particularly if it has to manually examine all prior foreclosure filings andschedule settlement conferences. Furthermore, CPLR § 8018(a)(1)(ii) should be amended

Page 6: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 6/134

I. Background: Summary of Justice Deceived

On August 2, 2011, MFY published Justice Deceived  , which documented foreclosure lawfirms’ recent and widespread practice of filing foreclosure summons and complaints, but notfiling the RJI. It is the filing of the RJI, which is required to be filed with the filing of proof of service ( see Uniform Rules § 202.12-a), that enables the court to schedule a foreclosuresettlement conference. The foreclosure settlement conference part—a court-supervisedmediation in which the homeowner stands the best chance of obtaining a mortgage loanmodification and avoiding unnecessary foreclosure—was created by the New York Statelegislature as a response to the huge increase in residential foreclosure cases that hit the New

York courts in 2008. The rules governing the settlement conference part can be found in CPLR Rule 3408 and are discussed in greater detail in Justice Deceived .

As MFY discovered and documented in Justice Deceived , New York State’s foreclosurelaw firms routinely violated CPLR Rule 3408 and Uniform Rules § 202.12-a by filingsummonses and complaints in residential foreclosure actions but not filing the RJIs, creating a“shadow docket” of foreclosure cases, and preventing homeowners from entering the one arenawhere they had the greatest chance of obtaining a loan modification or other loss mitigation

options: the foreclosure settlement part.

The foreclosure law firms’ creation of this shadow docket coincided with the OCA'sOctober 2010 requirement that foreclosure law firms sign an affidavit attesting to the accuracy of allegations in the complaint. OCA required the Due Diligence Affirmation in response to therobo-signing scandal that broke in September 2010. With wide-spread robo-signing of foreclosure documents, courts could no longer rely on the allegations in the complaint and thus,to guarantee the integrity of the judicial foreclosure process, OCA required that foreclosure lawfirms submit a Due Diligence Affirmation.

To document this shadow docket, MFY reviewed three months’ worth of residentialforeclosure filings in two of New York City’s hardest hit boroughs, Brooklyn and Queens.These three months included the following:

March 2010 – seven months prior to the robo-signing scandal and the Due Diligence

Affirmation requirement, and used as a “control” month;  November 2010 – the first full month after the implementation of the Due Diligence

Requirement; and

March 2011 – five months after the Due Diligence Affirmation requirement went intoeffect

Page 7: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 7/134

foreclosure cases filed in Brooklyn and Queens in November 2010 and March 2011, theforeclosure law firms were in flagrant violation of the law.

These results stood in stark contrast to the control group of March 2010 residentialforeclosure filings, cases that were filed before the Due Diligence Affirmation requirement. InMarch 2010, in the majority of cases, the RJI was filed within two months of filing theforeclosure summons and complaint. While this still violates the law (the RJI must be filedsimultaneously with the proof of service), the two-month delay is not nearly as damaging tohomeowners as the eight-to-ten-month delay that began to happen after the issuance of the DueDiligence Affirmation requirement.

As detailed in Justice Deceived , this violation has had a disastrous impact onhomeowners, who benefit from court oversight of the loan modification negotiation process.The longer the delay in getting to the settlement conference, the larger the homeowner’s arrearsgrow, and the more difficult it becomes to modify the mortgage. A home that could have beensaved if the case had reached the settlement conference part within two months of the filing of the summons and complaint becomes significantly harder to save ten months down the road.

II. Foreclosure Law Firms’ Behavior Has Changed Only Incrementally

From February through April 2012, MFY re-reviewed the November 2010 and March2011 residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens to determine whether foreclosurelaw firms had corrected their misconduct in the intervening ten months since these cases werefirst reviewed for  Justice Deceived . MFY also examined a new, third month—October 2011. Inreviewing this new more recent month, MFY sought to determine whether, since the publicationof its report, foreclosure law firms respect the law in more recently filed cases

a. 43% of the November 2010 and March 2011 Foreclosure Filings

Remain Mired in the Shadow Docket 

MFY's re-review of the November 2010 and March 2011 residential foreclosure filings inBrooklyn and Queens revealed that while more RJIs had been filed in the intervening ten monthssince the last review, 43% of all cases are still in the shadow docket.

Page 8: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 8/134

In November 2010, the first full month after the institution of the Due DiligenceAffirmation requirement, 389 residential foreclosure actions were filed in Brooklyn and Queens.

In 383 of those cases, proofs of service of the summons and complaints were filed with thecounty clerk soon after the action was commenced, triggering the requirement that the RJI andthe Due Diligence Affirmation be filed simultaneously.3 A review of the cases’ docket sheets inApril 2012 revealed, however, that RJIs had been filed in only 159 cases. In another 86 actions,the foreclosing plaintiffs voluntarily discontinued the cases without filing RJIs. Thus, as of April2012— 17 months after the November 2010 filing of those foreclosure actions and the proofs of service—152 cases have yet to move to the settlement conference part and instead sit in theshadow docket. Currently, for those cases filed in November 2010, 39% of the residential

foreclosure cases are in the shadow docket.

When the November 2010 actions were first reviewed in June 2011, 82% of the caseswere in the shadow docket.4 The below charts demonstrate the change in the past ten months for cases filed in November 2010.

No RJIs

82%

Stips to

Discont

but no RJI

5%

RJIs filed

13%

June 2011 Review of November 2010

Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS

No RJIs

39%

Stips to

Discont

but no RJI

22%

RJIs filed

39%

April 2012 Review of November2010

Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS

Similarly, a re-review of the March 2011 residential foreclosure actions revealed that asubstantial number of cases are still in the shadow docket with homeowners unable to obtainrelief in the settlement conference. In Brooklyn and Queens, 524 foreclosure actions were filedin March 2011, with proofs of service filed in 521 of those cases. 5 Yet only 216 RJIs were filedas of April 2012, despite the fact that Uniform Rules § 202.12-a(b)(1) requires that the RJI be

filed simultaneously with the proof of service. For March 2011 foreclosure filings, 68 actionswere voluntarily discontinued without the filing of an RJI. Thus, as of April 2012— 13 months

3See Appendices B & C for a list of all residential foreclosure cases filed in Brooklyn and Queens in November 

2010.

10 Months Later

Page 9: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 9/134

after the March 2011 filing of those foreclosure actions and the proofs of service—240 cases, or 46% of all March 2011 residential foreclosure actions, are still in the shadow docket.

When the March 2011 filings were first reviewed almost a year ago in June 2011, 91% of cases were in the shadow docket.6 The below charts graphically portray the change in the pastten months.

No RJIs

91%

Stips toDiscont

but no RJI

0%

RJIs filed

9%

June 2011 Review of March 2011

Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS

No RJIs

46%

Stips to

Discont

but no RJI

13%

RJIs filed

41%

April 2012 Review of March 2011

Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS

While it is true that in the intervening 10 months, foreclosure law firms have begun to fileRJIs and more homeowners have reached the settlement conference, foreclosure law firms arestill in violation of the law in 43% of foreclosure cases filed in November 2010 and March 2011.For homeowners who remain in the shadow docket, their chances of obtaining a mortgagemodification, if and when they get to the settlement conference process, decrease each day whilethey remain in this limbo-state. A recent study by the National Consumer Law Center demonstrates that mediation programs like New York State's settlement conferences significantly

increase the number of sustainable loan modifications.7

b. More Recent Filings Show that Any Behavioral Change Was an Aberration

The April 2012 review of the November 2010 and March 2011 foreclosure filingsdemonstrated that while a large number of homeowners still languish in the shadow docket, atleast there was a decrease from the June 2011 review of the shadow docket for those two months.

To determine if the glimmer of foreclosure law firms’ improvements denoted systemicimprovement, MFY reviewed residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens for a morerecent month: October 2011. Presumably, after the publication of  Justice Deceived in August2011, foreclosure law firms would have responded to exposure of the existence of the hugeshadow docket and modified their behavior in terms of handling future foreclosure cases. But a

i f th O t b 2011 id ti l f l fili i B kl d Q th t

10 Months Later

Page 10: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 10/134

 proofs of services were filed in 359 cases.8 Although the law requires foreclosure firms tosimultaneously file RJIs with those proofs of service, as of April 2012, only 92 RJIs were filed in

Brooklyn and Queens for residential foreclosure cases filed in October 2011. Another 12 caseswere voluntarily discontinued without the filing of an RJI, leaving 264 cases in the shadowdocket. Thus, as of April 2012—six months after the October 2011 filing of the summons andcomplaint—72% of residential foreclosure cases are in the shadow docket.

Any hope that the August 2011 publication of  Justice Deceived and OCA’s attention tothe shadow docket issue had caused foreclosure law firms to alter their behavior is belied by theOctober 2011 data.

No RJIs

72%

Stips toDiscont but

no RJI

3%

RJIs filed

25%

April 2012 Review of October 2011

Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS

c. Foreclosure Law Firms File Discontinuances without Any Basis in 12% of All Cases

A review of the November 2010 and March 2011 residential foreclosure filings inBrooklyn and Queens raises a new issue: the filing of discontinuances.

Actions are generally discontinued if the two parties reach a settlement and there is nolonger a reason to proceed with the action. In the context of a foreclosure action, discontinuanceis filed if a loan modification is reached, the homeowner is able to pay off the arrears, a shortsale is agreed upon, or the parties agree upon some other work-out that moots the foreclosureaction.

In some cases, the parties filed stipulations and motions to discontinue stating that thecase was settled. In 12% of the residential foreclosure cases filed in Brooklyn and Queens in November 2010 and March 2011, however, discontinuances were filed without providing anyb i f th di ti O l i th t b d f thi ti i th t th

Page 11: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 11/134

Number of Cases

As of March 2012

Cases filed in

November 2010

Total = 389

BK & QNS

Cases filed in

March 2011

Total = 524

BK & QNS

Cases filed in

October 2011

Total = 368

BK & QNS

Discontinued by Motion or by Stipulation

(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)

103

(27%)

91

(17%)

12

(3%)

Discontinued because of Settlement Dueto a Loan Modification/Loss Mitigation

(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)

31

(8%)

39

(7%)

3

(1%)

Discontinued Due to Bank’s Filing Error (e.g. bank failed to provide homeowner withthe required RPAPL notice)(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)

4

(1%)

3

(0.5%)

0

(0%)

Discontinued with No Reason Given

(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)

63

(16%)

45

(8.6%)

9

(2.5%)

Reviewer was Unable to View Filings

(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)

5

(1%)

4

(1%)

0

(0%)

Allowing a foreclosure law firm to discontinue an action after its examination of the factsof the case reveal that there were problems with the initial summons and complaint only further damages and prejudices homeowners, especially those who were trying to negotiate a mortgagemodification.9 With a discontinuance, a homeowner has no hope of getting before a judge untilthe Plaintiff re-files the case, which could take months. During this time, arrears continue to

accrue, making a mortgage modification more difficult to achieve when the case is re-filed.

The Due Diligence Affirmation was designed to prevent false allegations in foreclosurecomplaints. The 12% rate of groundless discontinuances combined with the 43% of cases thatcontinue to sit in the shadow docket reflect that the Due Diligence Affirmation is currently nothaving its intended effect. For cases filed in November 2010 and March 2011 in Brooklyn andQueens, 55% of all residential foreclosure complaints appear to be unreliable, or at the very leastsuspect, as evidenced by the foreclosure law firms’ own actions, or more aptly, inaction.

d. One Bright Spot: Courts Quickly Schedule Conferences after Cases

 Are Removed from the Shadow Docket 

A positive finding revealed in MFY’s re-review of residential foreclosure actions is thatthe courts schedule settlement conferences fairly quickly. Thus, if foreclosure firms actually

Page 12: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 12/134

followed the law and filed the RJI simultaneous with the filing of the proof of service,homeowners could almost be assured of a prompt settlement conference.

In those cases where an RJI is filed, Uniform Rules § 202.12-a(c) requires that the courtschedule a settlement conference within 60 days of the filing of the RJI. Queens Supreme Courthas fared better than Kings Supreme Court in scheduling the first settlement conference in lessthan the 60 days required by the rule. In Queens, for cases filed in November 2010, the averagetime between an RJI filing and the first settlement conference in Queens was 50 days; for casesfiled in March 2011, it was 53 days; and for cases filed in October 2011, it was 48 days.

Kings Supreme Court, on the other hand, usually takes more than the 60 days affordedunder the Uniform Rules to schedule an initial conference. In Brooklyn, for cases filed in November 2010, the average time between an RJI filing and the first settlement conference was68 days, slightly outside the time limit; for cases filed in March 2011, it was 64 days; and for cases filed in October 2011, it was 83 days, significantly outside the time limit allotted by courtrule.

OCA stands ready to schedule settlement conferences within the time demanded by the

Uniform Rules. If the foreclosure law firms began filing RJIs with the proof of services for newly filed cases, getting homeowners quickly into a settlement conference within 60 days iscertainly possible. However, OCA will likely require some flexibility for those cases currentlysitting in the shadow docket, likely in the tens of thousands. To schedule settlement conferencesin all cases in the shadow docket within the 60 days might prove difficult; OCA should not becriticized for what is the fault of the foreclosure law firms—the creation of the shadow docket.

III. Conclusion

MFY's re-examination of the November 2010 and March 2011 foreclosure filings and itsnew review of October 2011 foreclosure filings reveals the foreclosure law firms’ continuedviolations of the Uniform Rules, which burdens the court system, damages individualhomeowners—some irreparably—and prevents the economy from recovering. As a result, MFYstrongly urges OCA to adopt the policies and practices outlined earlier in Summary of Findingsand Recommendations.

Additionally, as OCA bears the economic brunt of solving the this crisis caused by NewYork's foreclosure law firms, MFY urges the New York State Legislature to amend CPLR §8018(a)(1)(ii) to increase the foreclosure filing surcharge to $340. The amendment shouldclearly state that this foreclosure filing surcharge should not be passed onto homeowners under  pain of treble damages, costs and attorney’s fees.

Page 13: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 13/134

APPENDIX A

Page 14: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 14/134

Methodology

This investigation of the foreclosure law firms’ abuse of the Due Diligence Affirmationwas conducted by MFY Legal Services, Inc. (“MFY”) from February 2012 through April 2012.

The data is derived from publicly available information located in the County Clerks’ Offices in

Brooklyn and Queens. As with the first report, Brooklyn and Queens were chosen because they

remain the hardest hit counties in New York City in terms of foreclosures.

MFY re-reviewed residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens for: (1)

 November 2010, the first full month after the institution of the Due Diligence Affirmation; and

(2) March 2011, the fifth full month after the Due Diligence Affirmation requirement to

\determine if November 2010’s data was only a short-term response to the Due Diligence

Affirmation requirement. In addition, MFY conducted research on a new and more recent

month: October 2011. MFY analyzed all residential foreclosure cases filed in Brooklyn and

Queens in October 2011.

Determining the number of residential foreclosure filings in each month was a two-step

 process. First, MFY searched the “Judgment and Lien Book” located in the County Clerks’

offices for each month to determine upon which properties notices of pendency were filed. From

that search, MFY was able to identify all foreclosure actions filed in each county and obtain the

index number for each foreclosure. Once MFY had these index numbers, it was able to move to

step two, reviewing the case files for each of these index numbers to determine if they were

residential foreclosures. Those identified as such were analyzed to determine whether RJIs,

answers, stipulations to discontinue or any other papers were filed. For each residential

foreclosure action identified, MFY possesses a copy of the Clerk of Court’s docket sheet.

In order to determine if and when a settlement conference was scheduled, MFY reviewed

the Unified Court Systems online case information system located at

http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/ecourtsMain.

On this re-review, for November 2010, MFY analyzed 389 residential foreclosure filings

in Brooklyn and Queens. This was a reduction from the 393 cases analyzed in the August 2011 Justice Deceived as it became apparent as the case progressed that some cases originally

considered residential foreclosures were in fact commercial mortgages. MFY does not believe

that this change has a significant impact on its analysis. For March 2011, MFY re-reviewed 524

residential foreclosure filing in Brooklyn and Queens. Again, there was a reduction from the 529

Page 15: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 15/134

Overall, MFY reviewed case histories for 1,281 residential foreclosure filings to produce

this update.

Page 16: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 16/134

APPENDIX B

Page 17: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 17/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 1

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

1.  Baum –

 Atty Change GPO

12/27/11

26940/10 Wells F 11/1/10 11/30/10 8/15/11

Filed by P

8/15/11

&10/31/11

Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 2/25/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference: 11/22/11

2.  Baum 26939/10 Wells F 11/1/10 11/16/10 No No No Answer filed on 2/3/11

Notice of Appearance filed on 2/25/11

Rejection of Answer filed 3/3/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/31/11 – noreason

3.  Baum 26927/10 Wells F 11/1/10 11/16/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/7/11 – no

reason

4.  Baum 27875/10 Wells F 11/12/10 11/30/10 1/10/12

Filed by P

No No Motion to Discontinue Action filed 1/26/12

– no reason

Ecourts: Motion Return Date 1/18/12

5.  Baum 27874/10 Wells F 11/12/10 11/30/10 8/26/11

Unable toOpen

Unable to

Open

No Unable to open the RJI in Court’s docket

6.  Baum 27876/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/23/10 1/18/12

Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 11/24/10

Notice of Appearance filed on 1/4/11

Motion to Discontinue Action filed 1/18/12

– no reasonEcourts: Motion Return date 1/27/12

7. 

Baum 28174/10 HSBC 11/16/10 12/2/10 5/20/11Filed by P No Yes Motion to discontinue filed 5/20/11 – noreason

Order Discontinuing action filed 8/30/11

Notice of Entry filed 11/1/11Ecourts: Motion return date 6/29/11

8.  Baum 28173/10 Wells F 11/16/10 12/14/10 4/21/11 No Yes FILED AS PILLAR

Reply to Counterclaims filed 1/14/11

Amended Motion to Discontinue filed

Page 18: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 18/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 2

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

4/21/11 – no reason

Ecourts: Motion Return Date 5/18/11

9.  Baum –

 Atty Change Davidson

Fink 

1/9/12

28165/10 Citimtg 11/16/10 12/6/10 6/15/11

Filed by P

6/15/11 Yes FILED AS PILLAR

Case Status Ltr filed 7/5/11Referee’s Directive filed 10/25/11 –

Defendant to provide documents

Notice of Appearance filed 1/12/12

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/21/1110.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

Rosicki

12/9/11

28164/10 Wells F 11/16/10 11/30/10 11/23/11Filed by P

No Yes FILED AS PILLARMotion to dismiss filed 11/22/11

Recusal Order filed 12/14/11

Order filed 1/30/12Ecourts: Motion return date 11/30/11

11.  Baum 28292/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/30/10 6/17/11Filed by P

No Yes Answer filed on 1/10/11Reply to Counterclaims filed on 1/12/11

Motion to Discontinue Action filed 6/17/11– no reasonNotice of Appearance filed 10/19/11

Order filed 2/2/12

Ecourts: Motion return date 6/21/11

12.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

Fein12/7/11

28287/10 Wells F 11/17/10 12/7/10 7/1/11

Filed by P

7/1/11 Yes FILED AS PILLAR

Answer filed on 1/13/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/2/11

13.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

Shapiro12/29/11

28286/10 PNC 11/17/10 11/30/10 No No No FILED AS PILLAR

14.  Baum –

 Atty Change 28284/10 Wells F 11/17/10 1/12/11 6/22/11

Filed by P6/22/11 Yes FILED AS PILLAR

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/27/11

Page 19: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 19/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 3

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Rosicki

12/19/11

15.  Baum –

 Atty Change GPO

12/27/11

28282/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/30/10 6/22/11

Filed by P

6/22/11 Yes FILED AS PILLAR

Consent to change attorney filed on2/10/11

Notices of Appearances filed 7/1/11,

8/1/11, 11/21/11

Ecourts: First FCP conference 7/27/1116.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

GPO

12/27/11

28345/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/30/10 8/31/11Filed by P

8/31/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/15/10Reply to counterclaims filed on 12/29/10

Notice of Appearance filed on 1/13/11

Notice of Appearance filed on 2/25/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/2/11

17.  Baum –

 Atty Change

DavidsonFink 11/29/11

28530/10 Aurora 11/19/10 12/13/10 No No No

18.  Baum 28531/10 HSBC 11/19/10 12/7/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/20/11Stip cancelling lis pendens filed on 3/24/11

– mtg reinstated

19.  Baum 28532/10 HSBC 11/19/10 12/6/10 1/20/12

Filed by P

No Yes Amended Aff of Service Filed on 12/13/10

Motion to Discontinue filed 1/20/11 – noreasonEcourts: Motion Return Date 1/30/12

20.  Baum 28639/10 Citimtg 11/22/10 12/7/10 9/21/11Filed by P

No Yes FILED AS PILLARMotion to Discontinue filed 9/21/11 – no

reason

Order discontinuing action filed 10/24/11Ecourts: Motion return date 10/12/11

Page 20: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 20/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 4

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

21.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Davidson

Fink 

1/19/12

28675/10 Citimtg 11/22/10 12/6/10 5/27/11

Filed by P

5/27/12 Yes FILED AS PILLAR

Answer filed on 12/15/10Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/28/11

22.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

Frenkel12/19/11

28820/10 WellsF 11/23/10 12/7/10 No No No

23.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

DavidsonFink 

11/29/11

28945/10 Aurora 11/24/10 12/16/10 No No No

24.  Baum 28983/10 HSBC 11/24/10 2/10/11 No No No FILED AS PILLAR

25.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Frenkel12/22/11

29096/10 Wells F 11/29/10 4/22/11 7/20/11

Filed by P

7/20/11 Yes Answer filed 1/11/11

P’s response to Discovery Demands filed

6/8/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/16/11

26.  Baum 29118/10 Fannie Mae 11/29/10 12/21/10 11/15/11Filed by P

11/15/11 Yes Answer filed 1/11/11P’s response to Discovery Demands filed

6/8/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/22/12

27.  Baum 29233/10 GMAC 11/30/10 12/13/10 No No No FILED AS PILAR

Notice of Appearance filed on 1/10/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/22/11 - no

reason

28.  Fein 26919/10 Household 11/1/10 11/8/10 No No No

29.  Fein 27094/10 Aurora 11/3/10 11/10/10 No No No Rejection of Answer filed on 12/29/10

Page 21: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 21/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 5

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

30.  Fein 27085/10 Aurora 11/3/10 11/10/10 1/27/12

Filed by P

1/27/12 Yes Answer filed on 12/1/10

Rejection of answer filed on 12/29/10Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/27/12

31.  Fein 27091/10 ResidentialFunding

11/3/10 11/12/10 No No No

32.  Fein 27092/10 HSBC 11/3/10 11/12/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/17/10

33.  Fein 27096/10 1ST

United 11/3/10 11/15/10 5/16/11

Filed by P

5/16/11 Yes Motion for Order of Referenced filed

5/16/11Notice of Appearance filed 7/5/11

Order filed 10/11/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/28/11

34.  Fein 27250/10 US Bank 11/3/10 11/12/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/16/10Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/22/11 – loss

mitigation

35.  Fein 27357/10 HSBC 11/5/10 11/12/10 12/2/11

Filed by P

12/2/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/14/10

Rejection of Answer filed on 12/21/10Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/7/12

36.  Fein 27358/10 Nationstar 11/5/10 11/12/10 No No No

37.  Fein 27359/10 Deutsche 11/5/10 11/18/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/17/10

Rejection of Answer filed 10/6/11

Answer filed 10/12/11

38.  Fein 27507/10 Nationstar 11/8/10 11/15/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 4/12/11 – mtg

reinstated39.  Fein 27506/10 Flagstar 11/8/10 11/22/10 6/22/11Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 1/11/11Settlement Conf. Notice filed 11/7/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/27/11

40.  Fein 27720/10 HSBC 11/10/10 11/22/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 2/10/11

41.  Fein 27721/10 BeneficialHome

11/10/10 11/18/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/26/11 – lossmitigation

42.  Fein 27719/10 Household 11/10/10 11/19/10 No No No

Page 22: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 22/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 6

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

43.  Fein 27718/10 Bayview 11/10/10 12/8/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/17/11 – mtg

modification

44.  Fein 27720/10 HSBC 11/10/10 11/22/10 No No No Notice of Appearance Filed on 2/10/11

45.  Fein 27882/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 NONE No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/11/12 – no

reason

46.  Fein 27779/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/24/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/13/10

Notice of Appearance filed on 12/21/10

Demand for Notice and Inspection filed on2/2/11

47.  Fein 28062/10 US Bank 11/15/10 11/23/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/15/10

48.  Fein 28063/10 Wells F 11/15/10 11/29/10 No No No Rejection of Answer filed on 1/25/11

49.  Fein –Atty Change

Hinshaw

9/19/11

28061/10 Deutsche 11/15/10 12/1/10 No No No Reply filed on 3/31/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/1/11 – no

reason

50.  Fein 28067/10 Beneficial

Home

11/15/10 11/29/10 10/6/11

Filed by D

1/23/11 Yes OSC filed by D 10/6/11

Court Order 12/5/11Notice of Appearance filed 1/24/11

Ecourts: Motion return date 10/6/11

Ecourts: First FCP 1/24/12 (after OSC

decided )

51.  Fein 28068/10 NY

CommunityBank 

11/15/10 11/23/10 No No No

52.  Fein 28281/10 HSBC 11/17/10 12/8/10 No No No Notice of Appearance Filed on 12/21/10

53.  Fein 28386/10 HSBC 11/18/10 11/30/10 No No No

54.  Fein 28525/10 Beneficial

Home

11/19/10 11/29/10 10/25/11

Filed by D

No Yes Answer filed on 1/24/11

Rejection of Answer filed on 2/7/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/1/12

55.  Fein 28521/10 Wells F 11/19/10 12/10/10 2/14/12 2/14/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/2/12

Page 23: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 23/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 7

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Filed by P

56.  Fein 28653/10 US Bank 11/22/10 12/3/10 8/19/11

Filed by P

8/19/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/9/12

57.  Fein 28654/10 Wells F 11/22/10 12/10/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/7/11 – mtg

paid off 

58.  Fein 28661/10 HSBC 11/22/10 12/8/10 No No No

59.  Fein 28662/10 GMAC 11/22/10 12/3/10 No No No

60.  Fein 28806/10 HSBC 11/23/10 12/14/10 No No No61.  Fein 28951/10 Chase 11/24/10 NONE No No No

62.  Fein 28949/10 HSBC 11/24/10 12/10/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/22/11 – loss

mitigation

63.  Fein 28950/10 HSBC 11/24/10 12/22/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/22/10Demand for Appearances filed on 12/22/10

Notice to Produce filed on 12/22/10

64.  Fein 29115/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/7/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 6/7/11

65.  Fein 29238/10 BranchBanking

11/30/10 12/6/10 No No No

66.  McCabe 26917/10 BeneficialHomeowner

11/1/10 4/19/11 No No No

67.  McCabe 27608/10 Wells F 11/9/10 12/2/10 No No No

68.  McCabe 27776/10 DeutscheBank 

11/12/10 12/7/10 No No No

69.  McCabe 28179/10 Aurora 11/16/10 12/30/10 1/13/12Filed by P

1/13/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/2/12

70.  McCabe 28290/10 DeutscheBank 

11/17/10 12/2/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/18/11 – noreason

71.  McCabe 28289/10 US Bank 11/17/10 12/9/10 No No No Answered filed on 1/5/11

72.  McCabe 28288/10 US Bank 11/17/10 12/2/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/7/11 – noreason

73.  McCabe 28285/10 US Bank 11/17/10 12/9/10 No No No Notice of appearance and Answer filed on

Page 24: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 24/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 8

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

12/22/10

Notice of appearance filed on 3/4/11

74.  McCabe 28283/10 BofA 11/17/10 12/2/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/2/10

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/16/10 – noreason

75.  McCabe 28381/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/7/10 11/30/11Filed by D

No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/15/12

76.  McCabe 28382/10 Wells F 11/18/10 12/10/10 3/31/11 &4/11/11

Filed by P

No Yes Answer filed on 1/4/11Reply to Answer filed on 1/21/11

Consent to change attorney filed on

2/10/11Answer filed on 3/24/11

OSC filed on 3/31/11

Cross motion filed 4/26/11Court order filed 7/14/11

Motion to convert to money judgment filed10/25/11Notice of Appearance filed 12/12/11

Notice of address change filed 1/23/12

Ecourts: Motion Return Date 4/11/11

77.  McCabe 28383/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/2/10 12/28/11

Filed by D

No Yes Answer filed on 2/1/11

Answer amended with AffirmativeDefenses and counterclaims on 2/18/11

Answer filed on 3/1/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference4/3/12

78.  McCabe 28384/10 BofA 11/18/10 11/30/10 No No No

79.  McCabe 28665/10 US Bank 11/22/10 1/24/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/9/11

Answer filed on 3/18/11

80.  McCabe 28802/10 US Bank 11/23/10 12/14/10 9/21/11

Filed by P

9/21/11 No Answer filed on 1/3/11

Notice of Discovery and Inspection of 

Page 25: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 25/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 9

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Documents filed on 1/28/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/1/11

81.  McCabe 28798/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/23/10 12/9/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/9/12 – no

reason

82.  McCabe 28948/10 US Bank 11/24/10 1/5/11 9/21/11

Filed by P

9/21/11 No

83.  McCabe 29114/10 Wells F 11/29/10 12/16/10 No No No Amended Affidavit of Service filed on

12/16/1084.  McCabe 29116/10 Deutsche

Bank 11/29/10 12/23/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/26/11 – no

reason

85.  McCabe 29237/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/14/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/14/10Answer filed on 1/28/11

86.  Rosicki 26959/10 Select

Portfolio

11/1/10 11/17/10 No No No

87.  Rosicki 26961/10 Aurora 11/1/10 11/15/10 11/2/11

Filed by P

11/2/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/13/12

88.  Rosicki 27097/10 Metlife 11/3/10 11/17/10 No No No Answer with counterclaims and defenses

filed on 12/2/10

Reply to answer filed on 12/8/10Notice of appearance filed on 3/1/11

89.  Rosicki 27285/10 Kondaur 11/4/10 11/16/10 2/14/11Filed by P

2/14/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/13/11

90. 

Rosicki 27432/10 US Bank 11/5/10 11/19/10 No No No91.  Rosicki 28573/10 Indymac 11/19/10 12/1/10 2/22/11

Filed by P2/22/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/7/10

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/13/11

92.  Rosicki 28831/10 US Bank 11/23/10 1/4/11 No No No Answer filed on 12/15/10

93.  Rosicki 28829/10 Citimtg 11/23/10 12/3/10 No No No

94.  Rosicki 28830/10 DLJ

Mortgage

11/23/10 12/6/10 12/7/11

Filed by P

11/2/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/7/12

Page 26: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 26/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 10

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

95.  Rosicki 28832/10 BankUnited 11/23/10 12/13/10 12/22/10

Filed by P

12/22/10 Yes Answer filed on 12/22/10

Reply to answer filed on 1/6/11Order filed 8/1/11 – removed from FCP

due to inadequate income

Affidavit of Serviced filed 8/4/11Motion for SJ filed 9/26/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/24/11

96.  Rosicki 29012/10 US Bank 11/24/10 12/7/10 12/14/10Filed by P

12/14/10 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/20/11

97.  Rosicki 29242/10 US Bank 11/30/10 12/20/10 12/29/10

Filed by P

12/29/10 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/24/11

98.  Shapiro 27884/10 US Bank 11/12/10 12/17/10 No No No

99.  Shapiro  27777/10 US Bank 11/12/10 11/24/10 10/5/11

Filed by P

10/5/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/1/10

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 12/14/11

100 Shapiro 27928/10 US Bank 11/12/10 1/7/11 1/10/12

Filed by P

1/10/12 No Amended Affidavit of Service filed on

1/27/11Notice of Pendency refilled on 2/14/11Motion for Order of Ref & Aff of Service

filed 1/10/12

Ecourts: Motion return date 2/29/12

101 Shapiro 27935/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/12/10 12/9/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/10/10

Notice of Appearance filed on 3/4/11

102 Shapiro 27936/10 DeutscheBank  11/12/10 2/17/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/17/10

103 Shapiro 27780/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/12/10 12/17/10 7/19/11

Filed by P

7/19/11 No Notice of Appearance filed on 3/1/11

Motion for Order of Ref filed 11/17/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/16/11

104 Shapiro 27932/10 HSBC 11/12/10 12/7/10 6/2/11Filed by P

6/2/11 Yes Motion for Order of Ref filed 11/18/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/13/11

105 Shapiro 27930/10 HSBC 11/12/10 12/6/10 4/5/11 4/5/11 Yes Motion for order of refe filed on 4/28/11

i C

Page 27: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 27/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 11

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Filed by P Special referee directive stating loan

modified – 8/8/11Letter filed 8/10/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/29/11 – mtg

modifiedEcourts: First FCP conference 5/19/11

106 Shapiro 27778/10 Wells F 11/12/10 1/18/11 6/10/11

Filed by P

6/10/11 Yes Referee Directive – removed from FCP

due to D defaultMotion for Order of Ref filed 11/29/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/20/11

107 Shapiro 27880/10 Fannie Mae 11/12/10 3/31/11 No No No Affidavit of Service filed on 3/31/11

108 Shapiro 27877/10 Bank of NY 11/12/10 12/6/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/7/10

Reply to answer filed on 1/4/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/20/11 – noreason

109 Shapiro 27929/10 Citimtg 11/12/10 12/22/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/2/10Reply to answer filed on 12/17/10

110 Shapiro 27933/10 Citimtg 11/12/10 12/16/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/27/11 – no

reason

111 Shapiro 27934/10 PHH

Mortgage

11/12/10 1/25/11 No No No Amended Affidavits of Service filed on

1/3/11, 1/4/11, 1/25/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/9/11 – no

reason

112 Shapiro 27931/10 PHH

Mortgage

11/12/10 12/7/10 No No No Amended Affidavit of Service filed 1/6/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/18/11 – no

reason

113 Shapiro 28180/10 HSBC 11/16/10 12/6/10 12/15/11

Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 3/1/11

Motion to Discontinue filed 12/15/11 – noreason

Ki C t N b 2010

Page 28: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 28/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 12

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Ecourts: Motion return date 1/13/12

114 Shapiro 28250/10 PHH

Mortgage

11/17/10 1/11/11 8/4/11

Filed by P

8/4/11 Yes Amended Affidavits of Service filed on

2/16/11, 2/22/11, 3/8/11

Order for Publication filed 9/13/11Affidavit of Publication filed 11/29/11

Ecourts: No details listed for the case

115 Shapiro 28249/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/17/10 1/5/11 8/2/11

Filed by P

8/2/11 Yes Motion for Order for Ref filed by 12/15/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/22/11

116 Shapiro 28385/10 US Bank 11/18/10 1/21/11 11/9/11

Filed by P

11/9/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/15/10

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/28/12

117 Shapiro 28370/10 DeutscheBank 

11/17/10 1/24/11 4/7/11Filed by P

4/7/11 Yes Case Status Ltr filed 6/28/11Motion for Order of Ref filed 7/7/11

Motion to Discontinue filed 1/20/12 – no

reason

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/19/11Ecourts: Motion return date 2/10/12

118 Shapiro 28526/10 US Bank 11/19/10 12/310 11/29/11

Filed by P

11/29/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 10/17/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/7/12

119 Shapiro 28657/10 Wells F 11/22/10 1/31/11 6/16/11

Filed by P

6/16/11 Yes Amended Affidavit of Service filed on

1/31/11

Motion for Order of Ref filed 7/5/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/26/11

120 Shapiro 28660/10 US Bank 11/22/10 12/7/10 8/19/11Filed by P

8/19/11&

1/23/12

Yes Notices of Appearance filed on 1/7/11,2/22/11 & 1/23/12

Reply to Counterclaims filed on 1/11/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/27/11

121 Shapiro -

 Atty Change

Sheldon

28663/10 Wells F 11/22/10 2/2/11 12/2/11

Filed by P

12/2/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/16/10

Amended Affidavits of service filed on1/11/11, 1/14/11, 1/18/11, 1/27/11, 2/2/11

Kings County November 2010

Page 29: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 29/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 13

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

May

4/29/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/10/12

122 Shapiro 28847/10 Fannie Mae 11/23/10 12/28/10 No No No Verified answer filed on 12/30/10

Reply filed on 1/14/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/10/11 – no

reason

123 Shapiro 29048/10 US Bank 11/26/10 12/15/10 7/14/11

Filed by P

7/14/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 1/4/11

Motion for Order of Ref filed 12/2/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/11/11

124 Sweeney 26949/10 Citimtg 11/1/10 11/17/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/28/11 –

mtg reinstated

125 Sweeney –

 Atty Change

Katz &

Rychik 

2/10/11

27275/10 Citibank 11/3/10 12/2/10 5/11/11Filed by P

No Yes Notices of Appearance filed on 12/2/10and 12/16/10

Answer an Interrogatories filed on

12/16/10

Change of Address filed 8/29/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/15/11

126 Sweeney 27751/10 Citimtg 11/10/10 11/18/10 No No No

127 Sweeney 27911/10 Citimtg 11/10/10 11/22/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 3/3/11- mtgreinstated

128 Sweeney 27912/10 Citimtg 11/12/10 12/8/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/9/10

129 Sweeney 27914/10 Citibank 11/12/10 2/24/11 No No No

130 Sweeney 28094/10 Citimtg 11/15/10 12/1/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/11/11 – noreasonNotice of appearance filed on 12/9/10

131 Sweeney 28192/10 Citimtg 11/16/10 1/3/10 No No No Additional affidavit of service filed on1/3/11

132 Sweeney 28696/10 Citimtg 11/22/10 12/9/10 No No No

133 Sweeney 28697/10 Citimtg 11/22/10 12/14/10 No No No Notice of appearance filed on 12/9/10 and3/15/11

Kings County November 2010

Page 30: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 30/134

Kings County – November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 14

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

134 Sweeney 29125/10 Citibank 11/29/10 12/15/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/12/11 –

mtg reinstated

135 Sweeney 29249/10 Citimtg 11/30/10 12/15/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/15/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/5/11 –mtg modified

136 Dorf –

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

26975/10 US Bank 11/1/10 1/21/10 No No No

137 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

26976/10 HSBC 11/1/10 12/3/10 No No No

138 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

27498/10 HSBC 11/8/10 11/18/10 No No No

139 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

27500/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/8/10 11/29/10 No No No

140 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

27467/10 DeutscheBank 

11/8/10 12/7/10 No No No Affidavit of Service filed 2/1/12

141 Dorf 27499/10 Wells F 11/8/10 11/17/10 No No No

142 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

28035/10 HSBC 11/15/10 12/6/10 No No No

Kings County – November 2010

Page 31: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 31/134

Kings County November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 15

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

143 Dorf 28359/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/18/10 12/13/10 8/3/11

Filed by P

8/3/11 No Motion for order to appoint referee filed

8/3/11Ecourts: No record

144 Dorf 28361/10 DeutscheBank 

11/18/10 12/1/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/25/11 –case settled

145 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

28362/10 HSBC 11/18/10 12/9/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 2/10/11

146 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

28360/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/18/10 12/1/10 No No No

147 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

28743/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/23/10 12/23/10 No No No

148 Dorf–

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

29212/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/10/10 No No No

149 Dorf 29214/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/17/10 No No No

150 Dorf 29213/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/17/10 No No No Reply filed on 1/7/11 (no answer listed as

filed)

151 Dorf 29211/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/17/10 No No No

152 Frenkel 27100/10 BofA 11/3/10 11/16/10 2/16/11

Filed by P

2/16/11 Yes Motion coverpage filed 2/16/11

Judgment filed 7/8/11

Motion to Discontinue filed 9/23/11 – noreason

Ecourts: Motion return date 3/14/11

Kings County – November 2010

Page 32: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 32/134

Kings County November 2010

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 16

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

153 Frenkel 27501/10 OneWest 11/8/10 12/7/10 No No No CPLR 8019D filed 1/10/12

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/10/12 – noreason

154 Frenkel 27609/10 OneWest 11/9/10 11/26/10 1/20/12Filed by D

No No Order to Show Cause filed 1/20/12Ecourts: OSC return date 1/23/12

155 Frenkel 28176/10 Chase 11/16/10 12/6/10 No No No

156 Frenkel 28685/10 BofA 11/22/10 12/23/10 3/17/11

Filed by P

No Yes Motion coverpage fee paid on 3/17/11

Judgment filed 7/18/11 & 1/5/12Ecourts: Motion return date 3/29/11

157 Frenkel 28952/10 Deutsche

Bank 

11/24/10 12/13/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/14/11 – no

reason

158 Stein 27126/10 Chase 11/3/10 12/1/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/22/10

Answer filed on 12/29/10

159 Stein 27534/10 US Bank 11/8/10 11/19/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/21/11 –

case settled

160 Stein 27536/10 US Bank 11/8/10 11/29/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/1/10Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/9/12 – no

reason

161 Stein 28093/10 PHH 11/15/10 11/30/10 7/11/11Filed by P

7/11/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/10/11

162 Stein 28308/10 Chase 11/17/10 12/10/10 No No No

163 Stein 28550/10 Onewest 11/19/10 12/3/10 10/6/11

Filed by P

10/6/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/14/10

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/24/12164 Stein 28549/10 US Bank 11/19/10 12/17/10 8/22/11Filed by P

8/22/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/27/11

165 Lynch 28988/10 FlushingSavings

11/24/10 12/22/10 3/4/11Filed by P

12/29/11 Yes Motion Coverpage fees paid on 3/4/11,12/30/11, & 2/6/12

Aff of Service filed 12/30/11

Ecourts: Motion return date 1/13/12

166 Lynch – 28989/10 Flushing 11/24/10 12/13/10 8/24/11 No Yes Motion coverpage fee paid 8/24/11

Kings County – November 2010

Page 33: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 33/134

g y

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 17

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

 Atty Change

Konner11/2/11

Savings Filed by P Ecourts: No details listed

167 May 28358/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/6/10 1/19/11Filed by P

1/19/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/22/10Motion to Discontinue filed 1/3/12 –

modified

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/17/11

168 May 27878/10 US Bank 11/12/10 1/12/11 3/15/11Filed by P

3/15/11&1/18/11

Yes Affidavit filed on 3/15/11Case Status Ltr filed on 6/28/11Motion for Order of Ref filed 1/18/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/15/11

169 May 28994/10 Waterfall

Victoria

Master Fund

11/24/10 12/10/11 01/19/11

Filed by P

1/19/11 Yes Notices of Appearance filed 5/25/111 &

6/2/11

Referee’s directive filed 10/25/11 –removed from FCP due D’s lack of income

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/17/11170 May 28995/10 US Bank 11/24/10 12/10/10 2/1/11

Filed by P

2/1/11 Yes Reply filed on 4/13/11

Notice of Appearance filed 5/19/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference4/15/11

171 Weinreb –

 Atty Change

Katz

1/6/11

27881/20 Deutsche

Bank 

11/12/10 12/8/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/6/10

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/23/11 –mtg modified

172 Weinreb 27879/10 Wells Fargo 11/12/10 12/1/10 2/2/11

Filed by P

No Yes Motion coverpage fee paid on 2/2/11

Order to discontinue action filed on

3/10/11 – homeowner deadAuthorization to appear filed on 4/14/11

Notice of appearance filed on 4/14/11

Ecourts: Other disposition 2/8/11

173 Steine 29113/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/22/10 No No No

Kings County – November 2010

Page 34: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 34/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 18

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

174 Steine 29111/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/28/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/28/10

Notice of Appearance filed 10/5/11Reply filed 10/13/11

175 Druckman 27774/10 LNV 11/12/10 11/23/10 No No No Notice of appearance filed on 2/16/11

176 Druckman 28664/10 WF 11/22/10 12/16/10 No No No Reply to counterclaims filed on 1/14/11

Notice of Appearance filed 7/29/11

177 Katz 29127/10 US Bank 11/29/10 12/16/10 12/6/11

Filed by P

12/6/11 No Answer filed on 1/13/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/7/12178 McGlinchey 27276/10 Aurora 11/4/10 12/8/10 5/3/11

Filed by PNo Yes Motion for Order of Reference filed

6/14/11

Cross Motions filed 7/8/11

Orders for traverse hearing filed 11/4/11 &

12/5/11Ecourts: Motion Return date 6/27/11

Ecourts: Traverse Hearing 3/15/12

179 Davidson 27554/10 Citimtg 11/8/10 11/23/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/19/11 – no

reason

180 Roach 26974/10 HSBC 11/1/10 11/30/10 12/12/11

Filed by P

12/12/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/10/12

181 Knuckles 28175/10 Citiproperty 11/16/10 12/9/10 No No No

182 Dorfman 28357/10 Deutshce

Bank 

11/18/10 12/10/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/27/11 –

case settled

183 Berkman 28690/10 BofA 11/22/10 1/25/11 No No No184 Masone 28694/10 Maspeth

Federal11/22/10 12/14/10 4/11/11

Filed by PNo Yes Reply filed on 1/10/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/1/11

Page 35: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 35/134

APPENDIX C

Queens County – November 2010

Page 36: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 36/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  1 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

1. 

Baum 27562/10 M & T 11/01/10 11/22/10 3/11/11Filed by P 03/11/11 Yes Notice of Appearance 8/24/11Answer filed by ?? 11/22/10

Ecourts reflects that a Motion to

Discontinue was filed 1/31/12 and deemedfully submitted w/out opposition 02/23/12

2.  Baum

 Atty Change 

– GPO

12/29/11

27563/10 Wells F 11/01/10 11/12/10 6/15/11Filed by P

6/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 08/10/11Order Signed – 8/16/11 – removed from

FCP due to D default

3.  Baum 27734/10 Wells F 11/03/10 11/18/10 11/30/11

Filed by P

11/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 01/18/12,

conferences ongoing

4.  Baum 28075/10 CitiMtg 11/08/10 11/22/18 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/22/11 – No

Reason provided

5.  Baum 28208/10 Wells F 11/09/10 12/03/10 No No No Answer filed 12/07/10

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/13/11 – loanreinstated

6.  Baum 28209/10 Wells F 11/09/10 11/22/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 02/09/11 –loan mod

7.  Baum

 Atty Change 

Berkman12/7/11

28210/10 Wells F 11/09/10 11/22/10 6/17/11

Filed by P

6/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/09/11, with

conferences ongoing to date.

8.  Baum 28359/10 CitiMtg 11/10/10 12/01/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/9/11 – loanreintstated

9.  Baum 28503/10 Wells F 11/12/10 11/24/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/15/11 – noreason

10.  Baum 28505/10 Wells F 11/12/10 11/23/10 No No No Answer filed 12/06/10

11.  Baum 28509/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/24/10 No No No

Queens County – November 2010

Page 37: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 37/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  2 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

 Atty Change –McCabe

12/4/11

12.  Baum 28512/10 CitiMtg 11/12/10 11/22/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed on 10/21/11 –

loan mod

13.  Baum 28640/10 Wells F 11/15/10 11/26/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed on 6/21/11 –

No Reason

14.  Baum 28642/10 Wells F 11/15/10 11/24/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed on 4/25/11 –

no reason15.  Baum 28643/10 CitiMtg 11/15/10 11/30/10 No No No Answer filed 12/03/10

16.  Baum 28644/10 GMAC 11/15/10 12/16/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/25/11 – no

reason

17.  Baum

 Attny

Change –McCabe

12/2/11

28900/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/26/10 10/5/11

Filed by P

12/2/11 Yes Ecourts indicates ex parte motion for “court

directed service” with order signed 11/23/11

18.  Baum

Attny

Change –Stein

12/2/11

28901/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/24/10 7/29/11

Filed by P

7/29/11 Yes Ecourts indicates 1st FSC 09/23/11, with

conferences ongoing to date.

19.  Baum

Attny

Change –Fein

12/21/11

28903/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/26/10 6/21/11

Filed by P

6/21/11 Yes Answer filed 12/3/10

Notice of App filed on 8/24/11 and 9/29/11

Ecourts indicates 1st FSC 08/09/11, withconferences going on to date. H/o

represented by QVLP.

20.  Baum 28905/10 PNC 11/17/10 11/26/10 1/17/11 No Yes Answer filed 12/9/10

Queens County – November 2010

Page 38: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 38/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  3 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

Filed by P Plaintiff filed Motion to Discontine01/19/12 – fully submitted as of 02/01/12.

21.  Baum 28907/10 CitiMtg 11/17/10 12/14/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/23/11 – noreason

22.  Baum 29053/10 Wells F 11/18/10 12/3/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/19/11 – loanreinstated

23.  Baum

 Atty Change 

– Fein12/1/11

29143/10 Wells F 11/19/10 12/10/10 10/18/11Filed by P

10/18/11 Yes Answer & Counterclaims filed 12/28/10Reply to Counterclaims filed 12/30/10

Notice of Appearance filed 1/27/11 and12/20/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/05/11, with

conferences ongoing to date.

24.  Baum

 Atty Change 

– Rosicki12/5/11

29144/10 Wells F 11/19/10 12/10/10 8/24/11

Filed by P

8/24/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/12/11.

Order signed 11/9/11 – removed from FCP

due to D default

25.  Baum 29264/10 Wells F 11/22/10 12/3/10 1/13/12Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 2/4/11Order to Discontinue 2/2/11 – loan mod

26.  Baum 29406/10 Wells F 11/23/10 12/3/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 3/3/11 – no

reason

27.  Baum 29598/10 Wells F 11/24/10 12/15/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/11/11 – no

reason

28.  Baum

 Atty Change 

Rosicki12/6/11

29599/10 Wells F 11/24/10 12/7/10 7/11/11

Filed by P

7/11/11 Yes Answer filed 12/8/10

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 09/22/11, with

conferences ongoing to date.

29.  BaumAtty

29600/10 Wells F 11/24/10 12/9/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/10/11

Queens County – November 2010

Page 39: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 39/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  4 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

Change –GPO

12/30/11

30.  Baum  29761/10 Wells F 11/29/10 12/13/10 1/20/12

Filed by P

No Yes Notices of Appearance filed 12/15/10 &

3/10/11

Discontinuance Motion filed 02/08/12,deemed fully submitted and granted

02/14/12. H/o represented by Beth P.

Schwartz, Esq. 718-254-6017.31.  Baum

 Atty Change – GPO

12/30/11

29759/10 Wells F 11/29/10 12/16/10 7/21/11

Filed by P

7/21/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se on 12/17/10

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/23/11, withconferences ongoing to date.

32.  Baum

 Atty Change 

– Rosicki

1/17/12 

29760/10 Wells F 11/29/10 12/10/10 11/7/11

Filed by P

11/7/11 Yes Answer filed 12/20/10

Notices of Appearance filed on 12/15/10;

12/20/10; 1/3/11; 1/10/11; 1/18/11

Reply to Counterclaims filed 1/20/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/03/12, with

conferences ongoing to date. H/o

represented by Robert Carrozzo, 516-355-0550.

33.  Baum 29762/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/16/10 1/24/11

Filed by P

No Yes Notices of Appearance filed on 12/28/10

&3/25/10

Ecourts reflects that P filed Motion to

Discontinue on 01/15/12, deemed fullysubmitted 02/07/12 without opposition. H/o

represented by Beth Schwartz, Esq., 718-

254-6017.

Queens County – November 2010

Page 40: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 40/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  5 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

34.  Baum 29763/10 Citibank 11/29/10 12/10/10 No No No Answer filed 12/15/10Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 3/9/11 – no

reason

35.  Baum

 Atty Change 

McCabe12/15/11

29764/10 M & T 11/29/10 1/3/11 04/05/11

Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 8/24/11

Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 08/08/11,

with conferences continuing to date.

36.  Baum 29766/10 US Bank 11/29/10 12/23/10 8/4/11

Filed by P

8/4/11 Yes Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 09/26/11, but

h/p defaulted.Order Signed 10/5/11 – removed from FCP

due to D defaultStip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/23/11 – mtg

paid off 

37.  Baum

 Atty Change 

– McCabe

12/15/111

29767/10 Midfirst 11/29/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed on 1/7/11

LP re-filed on 2/16/11 & 3/28/11

38.  Baum 29879/10 Wells F 11/30/10 2/3/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/25/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/7/11 – no

reason

39.  Baum 29880/10 Wells F 11/30/10 12/13/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 2/14/11 –

no reason

40.  Baum  29881/10 Wells F 11/30/10 12/16/10 No No No Answer filed 12/30/10

Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 2/25/11 –

no reason

41.  Sweeney 27529/10 CitiMtg 11/01/10 11/10/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 02/22/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/6/12 – mtgreinstated

Queens County – November 2010

Page 41: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 41/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  6 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

42.  Sweeney 27542/10 CitiMtg 11/01/10 11/22/10 6/3/11Filed by P

6/3/11&

9/30/11

Yes Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC 07/22/11, but h/odefaulted

Order Signed on 9/26/11 – removed from

FCP due to D’s defaultMotion for Order of Reference 10/13/11

43.  Sweeney 27706/10 CitiMtg 11/03/10 11/15/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 4/29/11 – Pfailed to provide RPAPL 1304 90 day

notice

44.  Sweeney 27707/10 CitiMtg 11/03/10 12/13/10 No No No Notices of App filed 11/22/10 & 02/16/1145.  Sweeney 27708/10 CitiMtg 11/03/10 11/12/10 No No No Notices of App filed 12/10/10 & 03/04/11

46.  Sweeney 27873/10 CitiMtg 11/04/10 11/12/10 7/12/11

Filed by P

7/13/11 Yes Answer filed 12/08/10

Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 09/01/11 andthat case settled at the conference.

47.  Sweeney 27875/10 CitiMtg 11/04/10 11/16/10 No No No

48.  Sweeney 27953/10 CitiMtg 11/05/10 11/22/10 No No No

49.  Sweeney 27954/10 CitiMtg 11/05/10 12/22/10 No No No

50.  Sweeney 28053/10 CitiMtg 11/08/10 11/16/10 No No No51.  Sweeney 28056/10 CitiMtg 11/08/10 11/30/10 04/14/11

Filed by D

No Yes Motion to Dismiss filed by h/o 4/14/11

Motion marked off-calendar 05/10/11

52.  Sweeney 28342/10 CitiMtg 11/10/10 11/22/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 11/22/11

53.  Sweeney 28343/10 CitiMtg 11/10/10 12/01/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed on 5/9/11 – no

reason

54.  Sweeney 28436/10 CitiMtg 11/12/10 11/22/10 No No No

55. 

Sweeney 28467/10 CitiMtg 11/12/10 11/17/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/4/11 – noreason

56.  Sweeney 28468/10 CitiMtg 11/12/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed on 6/21/11

57.  Sweeney 28794/10 CitiMtg 11/16/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed 01/11/11

58.  Sweeney 28797/10 CitiMtg 11/16/10 11/29/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/23/11 – mtg

Queens County – November 2010

Page 42: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 42/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  7 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

reinstated

59.  Sweeney 28799/10 CitiMtg 11/16/10 12/01/10 No No No

60.  Sweeney 29061/10 CitiMtg 11/18/10 11/29/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 2/23/11

61.  Sweeney 29572/10 CitiMtg 11/24/10 12/02/10 No No No

62.  Sweeney 29754/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/08/10 No No No

63.  Sweeney 29780/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/10/10 No No No Answer filed 12/17/10Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/27/11 – loan

mod

64.  Sweeney 29781/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/21/10 No No No Answer filed 12/21/10Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/3/11 – P

failed to provide RPAPL 1304 90 daynotice

65.  Sweeney 29782/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed 12/20/10Notice of Appearance filed 03/10/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/27/11 – P

failed to provide RPAPL 1304 90 day

notice66.  Sweeney 29780/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/10/10 No No No Answer filed 12/17/10

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/27/11 – loan

mod

67.  Sweeney 29894/10 CitiMtg 11/30/10 12/08/10 No No No Answer filed 12/23/10

68.  Fein 27523/10 Deutsche 11/01/10 11/09/10 No No No

69.  Fein 27680/10 Wells F 11/03/10 11/15/10 No No No Answer filed 11/29/10

70. 

Fein 27725/10 RBS 11/03/10 11/19/10 12/29/10Filed by D No Yes Answer filed 11/22/10Homeowner filed RJI 12/29/10Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 04/20/11

Order Signed 7/20/11 – removed from FCP

due to failure of D to provide docs (ecourts

Queens County – November 2010

Page 43: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 43/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  8 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

only indicates that a conference was heldthis date)

71.  Fein 27730/10 HSBC 11/03/10 11/17/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/20/11 – noreason

72.  Fein 27833/10 OneWest 11/04/10 11/12/10 6/27/11Filed by P

6/27/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 08/30/11, buth/o defaulted.

Order Signed 8/30/11 – removed from FCP

due to D default

73.  Fein 27928/10 OneWest 11/05/10 11/12/10 7/6/11 7/6/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 08/23/11, buth/o defaulted.Order Signed 8/23/11 – removed from FCP

due to D default

74.  Fein 28067/10 US Bank 11/08/10 12/03/10 7/25/11

Filed by P

7/25/11 Yes Notice of Appearances filed 11/22/10&

02/22/11

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/06/11, buth/o defaulted.

Order Signed 9/13/11 – removed from FCPdue to D defaultMotion for Order of Ref Filed 11/9/11

75.  Fein 28196/10 HSBC 11/09/10 11/17/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue 6/3/11 – no reason

76.  Fein 28337/10 HSBC 11/10/10 12/03/10 11/2/11Filed by D

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 04/06/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/11/12, with

conferences continuing. H/o represented by

Cabanillas & Assoc., 914-385-0292.

77.  Fein 28341/10 Deutsche 11/10/10 11/17/10 6/27/11

Filed by P

6/27/11 Yes Answer filed 01/11/11

Reply filed on 3/7/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/10/11

Notice of Appearance filed on 12/21/11

Queens County – November 2010

#

Page 44: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 44/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  9 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

H/o represented by Marrone Law Group,718-261-1711.

78.  Fein 28442/10 Aurora 11/12/10 11/22/10 No No No Answer filed 12/02/10

79.  Fein 28444/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/18/10 No No No

80.  Fein 28630/10 OneWest 11/15/10 11/30/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 03/04/11

81.  Fein 28792/10 OneWest 11/16/10 11/29/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/03/10

82.  Fein 28891/10 HSBC 11/17/10 12/01/10 No No No Answer filed 12/21/10

Reply filed 12/30/10

83.  Fein 28942/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/26/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/10/1184.  Fein 29013/10 GMAC 11/18/10 11/30/10 04/20/11

Filed by P4/20/11 Yes Answer filed 12/10/11

Unknown which party filed RJI

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC help 07/05/11 and

that the matter was “discontinued”Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 8/30/11 – P

failed to provide RPAPL 1304 90 day

notice

85.  Fein 29259/10 GMAC 11/22/10 12/01/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed on10/26/11 – P needs to comply with acondition precedent

86.  Fein 29260/10 Aurora 11/22/10 12/03/10 No No No

87.  Fein 29262/10 Deutsche 11/22/10 12/21/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 5/26/11

Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed on 8/22/11– no reason

88.  Fein 29533/10 CitiBank 11/24/10 12/13/10 6/27/11Filed by P

6/27/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 08/11/11, buth/o defaulted.

Order Signed 8/15/11 – removed from FCP

due to D default

89.  Fein 29570/10 Chase 11/24/10 12/07/10 No No No

Queens County – November 2010

Fi I d # B k D t Aff f RJI D Dl E t Oth

Page 45: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 45/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  10 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

90.  Fein 29750/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/06/10 No No No

91.  Fein 29752/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/14/10 No No No

92.  Fein 29889/10 Household 11/30/10 04/05/11 No No No

93.  Fein 29890/10 Deutsche 11/30/10 01/03/11 No No No Notice of Appearance 1/6/11

Affidavit of Service 1/10/11

Answer filed 01/13/11

Notices of Appearances 3/7/11 & 3/15/11

94.  McCabe 27763/10 Wells F 11/03/10 11/18/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 6/8/11 – no

reason95.  McCabe 27765/10 B of A 11/03/10 11/18/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/10/10

96.  McCabe 27766/10 Flagstar 11/03/10 12/02/11 02/22/11

Filed by P

2/22/11 No Motion to Amend Summons filed 2/22/11,

which was denied 3/3/11OSC to Amend Complaint filed 6/9/11,

denied 6/22/11

Ecourts does not show case as of 02/24/12

97.  McCabe 27767/10 Flagstar 11/03/10 11/23/10 02/15/11

Filed by P

2/15/11 No Ecourts does not show case as of 02/24/12

98.  McCabe 27857/10 Wells F 11/04/10 02/02/11 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 04/06/11 –

no reason

99.  McCabe 28246/10 US Bank 11/09/10 11/18/10 9/12/11Filed by P

9/12/11 No Ecourts reflects motion filed 12/20/2011

100. McCabe 28923/10 HSBC 11/17/10 12/29/11 01/13/11Filed by D

No Yes Motion to Dismiss filed by h/o 1/13/11Motion to Dismiss withdrawn 06/15/11

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 10/03/11

Consent to Representation by Attny 5/25/11H/o represented by Alexander Hakopian,

212-868-9688

101. McCabe 28924/10 HSBC 11/17/10 11/22/10 4/29/11 4/29/11 Yes Answer filed 12/01/10

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other

Page 46: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 46/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  11 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

Filed by P Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/09/11, buth/o defaulted

Order Signed 11/22/11 – removed from

FCP due to D default

102. McCabe 28925/10 HSBC 11/17/10 12/29/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/20/11

103. McCabe 28926/10 Deutsche 11/17/10 12/02/10 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 03/29/11 – no

reason

104. McCabe 29003/10 Deutsche 11/18/10 12/02/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/29/10

105. McCabe 29064/10 Deutsche 11/18/10 12/01/10 9/23/11Filed by P

9/23/11 Yes Answer filed 02/02/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/09/11, but

h/o defaulted

Order Signed – removed from RFP due todefault – 11/22/11

106. McCabe 29254/10 B of A 11/22/10 12/01/10 No No No Answer filed 12/02/10

107. McCabe 29255/10 Deutsche 11/22/10 12/14/10 1/19/12Filed by P

1/19/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/22/12, withconferences continuing

(Judge Grays – Queens Pilot Project)108. McCabe 29276/10 Flagstar 11/22/10 3/29/11 02/15/11

Filed by P

8/18/11 Yes Answer filed 02/02/10

Bank filed amended complaint 03/09/11

Bank filed affs of service by 03/29/11Amended Answer filed 04/05/11

Ecourts does not reflect that any FSC has

been scheduled or held

109. McCabe 29277/10 HSBC 11/22/10 12/06/10 No No No

110. McCabe 29446/10 US Bank 11/23/10 12/07/10 5/16/11

Filed by D

No Yes Answer filed 01/06/11

Motion to Dismiss filed on 5/24/11

Notice of Appearance filed on 7/6/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/13/11, with

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other

Page 47: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 47/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  12 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

conferences continuing to date (and interesttolled since 01/19/12)

H/o atty is George Beer, 718-523-3413

111. McCabe 29748/10 Deutsche 11/29/10 04/21/11 No No No

112. McCabe 29807/10 Deutsche 11/29/10 12/21/10 10/5/11Filed by P

10/5/11 Yes Answer filed 01/11/11NOAs filed 03/10/11 & 11/28/11

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/17/11, with

conferences continuing to date.

H/o atty is Donald Salfarlie, 718-291-7433113. Dorf 28138/10 HSBC 11/08/10 12/01/10 No No No Answer filed 12/06/11

Notice of Appearance filed 03/04/11

114. Dorf 28490/10 HSBC 11/12/10 12/17/10 No No No

115. Dorf 28491/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/30/10 No No No

116. Dorf 28662/10 Deutsche 11/15/10 12/16/10 No No No

117. Dorf 28665/10 HSBC 11/15/10 11/24/10 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 03/15/11 – mtg

reinstated

118. Dorf 28669/10 B of A 11/15/10 12/03/10 7/14/11Filed by P

7/14/11 Yes Answer filed 12/09/10Ecourts reflects 1

stFSC held 09/01/11, but

h/o defaulted.Order Signed – 9/8/11 - removed from FCP

due to D default

BUT, ecourts reflects that another FSC held11/07/11

Order Signed 11/16/11 (purpose unknown)

119. Dorf 29167/10 Deutsche 11/19/10 12/17/10 8/26/11

Filed by P

8/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/21/11, but

h/o defaulted.

Order Signed – 11/9/11 – removed fromFCP due to D default

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other

Page 48: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 48/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  13 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

120. Dorf 29170/10 Deutsche 11/19/10 12/01/10 7/28/11Filed by P

7/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects that 1st

FSC held 09/08/11,but the h/o defaulted.

Order Signed – 9/14/11 – case removed

from FSC part

121. Dorf 29173/10 Deutsche 11/19/10 12/20/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 02/01/11 –

compromised & settled

122. Dorf 29175/10 Deutsche 11/19/10 12/06/10 9/13/11

Filed by P

12/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects that 1st

FSC held 10/29/11,

but h/o defaulted

Order Signed 11/09/11- removed from FCPAffirmation of RPAPL 1304 Notice filed

12/15/11

123. Dorf 29179/10 HSBC 11/19/10 12/07/10 No No No

124. Dorf 29407/10 HSBC 11/23/10 12/10/10 8/3/11

Filed by P

8/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects that 1st FSC held 09/12/11,

but h/o defaulted

Order Signed 9/13/11- removed from FCPOrder of reference filed 12/20/11

125. Dorf 29409/10 HSBC 11/23/10 12/10/10 3/7/11Filed by D

No Yes Answer filed 01/07/11Ecourts reflects Mtn to Dismiss filed 3/7/11

Affirmation in Opp filed 10/26/11

Order on Traverse (service sustained)1/3/11

126. Dorf 29410/10 HSBC 11/23/10 12/20/10 7/8/11

Filed by P

7/8/11 Yes Answer filed 12/20/10

Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/23/11 and a

trial modification in place 02/23/12, with

FSC control dates continuingH/o atty J.G. Thomas & Ass 718-578-0019

127. Dorf 29411/10 US Bank 11/23/10 12/10/10 No No No

128. Dorf 29412/10 Deutsche 11/23/10 12/08/10 No No No

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other

Page 49: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 49/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  14 

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

129. Dorf 29574/10 US Bank 11/24/10 12/17/10 No No No

130. Dorf 29900/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/08/10 9/27/11

Filed by P

9/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/15/11, with

conferences ongoing

131. Dorf 29902/10 HSBC 11/30/10 01/06/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/10/11

132. Shapiro 28451/10 US Bank 11/12/10 11/24/10 9/28/11

Filed by P

9/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held on 11/17/11,

but h/o defaultedOrder signed 11/25/11 – removed from FCP

133. Shapiro 28471/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 01/11/11 9/26/11

Filed by P

9/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held on 11/07/11,

but h/o defaultedOrder signed 11/16/11 – removed from FCP

H/o atty is Dorothy Atchison 718-262-8032

134. Shapiro 28472/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 12/15/10 6/14/11

Filed by P

6/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held on 07/29/11,

but h/o defaultedOrder signed 8/11/11 – removed from FCP

Order of Reference filed – 10/26/11 (refiled

Due Dlg Aff)

135. Shapiro 28473/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/22/10 03/09/11Filed by P

3/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held on 05/05/11,but h/o defaultedOrder signed 5/17/11 – removed from FCP

Order of Reference filed 9/21/11

Judgment of Foreclosure & Sale filed 2/7/12

136. Shapiro 28475/10 HSBC 11/12/10 No No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 02/21/10 – no

reason

137. Shapiro 28477/10 US Bank 11/12/10 01/06/11 12/19/11

Filed by P

12/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/08/12, with

conferences ongoing

138. Shapiro 28889/10 US Bank 11/17/10 01/13/11 10/13/11

Filed by P

10/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/28/11, with

conferences ongoing

139. Shapiro 28890/10 US Bank 11/17/10 11/30/10 No No No Reply filed 12/22/10

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of  RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other

Page 50: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 50/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  15 

Filed ServiceJ g

Aff  Record

Notice of Appearance filed 01/10/11Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 10/24/11 –

no reason

140. Shapiro 29007/10 US Bank 11/18/10 01/13/11 12/22/11

Filed by P

12/22/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/01/12, with

conferences ongoing

141. Shapiro 29028/10 Fannie

Mae

11/18/10 01/07/11 6/24/11

Filed by P

6/24/11 yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/10/11, but

h/o defaulted

Order Signed 8/16/11 – removed from FCP

Order to Appoint Referee Signed 02/21/12142. Shapiro 29129/10 US Bank 11/19/10 01/07/11 9/27/11Filed by P

9/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/17/11, withconferences ongoing

143. Shapiro 29130/10 US Bank 11/19/10 1/6/11 No No No Answer filed 12/14/10Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 8/22/11 –

no reason

Stip of Discontinuance filed 10/31/11 – noreason

144. Shapiro 29180/10 FannieMae

11/19/10 02/16/11 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 1/23/11 –no reason

145. Shapiro 29390/10 Deutsche 11/23/10 01/06/11 No No No

146. Shapiro 29443/10 PHH Mtg 11/23/10 01/07/11 No No No “Reply” filed 02/04/11Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 11/10/11 –

no reason

147. Shapiro 29444/10 Fannie

Mae

11/23/10 12/09/10 5/10/11

Filed by P

5/10/11 Yes Answer filed 12/23/10

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 06/29/11, and

the case marked “settled-loan modified”Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 8/15/11

H/o atty – Ades & Assoc 516-487-1010

148. Shapiro 29560/10 Fannie 11/24/10 01/07/11 6/2/11 6/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/21/11, but

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of  RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other

Page 51: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 51/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  16 

Filed Serviceg

Aff  Record

Mae Filed by P not eligible for FSC b/c not owner-occupied

Order Signed – 7/28/11 removed from FCPOrder of Reference – 11/28/11

Judgment of F/C and Sale – 02/22/11

149. Shapiro 29562/10 HSBC 11/24/10 01/13/11 No No No Answer filed 02/04/11

Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 6/27/11 –no reason given

150. Shapiro 29565/10 HSBC 11/24/10 01/07/11 No No No

151. Shapiro 29566/10 BNY 11/24/10 01/06/11 8/9/11Filed by P 8/9/11 Yes Answer filed 02/10/11Answer (verified) filed 03/03/11Verified Reply filed 03/29/11

Ecourts reflects1st FSC held 09/23/11, with

conferences ongoingNotice of Appearance 12/27/11

H/o atty Dwyer & Assoc 212-203-4965

152. Shapiro 29568/10 US Bank 11/24/10 01/06/11 No No No

153. Shapiro 29687/10 Chase 11/26/10 1/20/11 No No No Answer filed 12/13/10154. Shapiro 29688/10 HSBC 11/26/10 01/07/11 12/15/11

Filed by P12/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1

stFSC held 02/08/12, with

conferences ongoing

155. Shapiro 29891/10 PHH Mtg 11/30/10 No No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 12/21/10 – noreason

156. Shapiro 29905/10 US Bank 11/30/10 01/07/11 04/11/11Filed by P

4/11/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 05/31/11, buth/o did not appear at 2d FSC on 07/19/11

Order Signed 7/20/11 – removed from FCP

157. Stein 27704/10 OneWest 11/03/10 11/10/10 8/5/11

Filed by P

8/5/11 Yes Answer filed 11/17/10

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/22/11, 2d

FSC held 10/20/11, but h/o defaulted for 3dFSC on 12/12/11

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of  RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other

Page 52: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 52/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  17 

Filed Service Aff  Record

Request for Adjournment filed 12/9/11Order Signed 12/21/11 – removed from

FCP due to D default

158. Stein 27705/10 Chase 11/03/10 11/17/10 No No No Notices of App filed 11/18/10 & 11/22/10

159. Stein 27876/10 OneWest 11/04/10 11/17/10 7/6/11Filed by P

7/6/11 Yes Answer filed 12/13/10Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/22/11, with

conferences ongoing

Notice of Appearance filed 12/21/11

H/o atty Elliot Schlissel 516-561-6645160. Stein 28220/10 US Bank 11/09/10 11/17/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 02/28/11Stip of Discontinuance filed 5/5/11 – settled

161. Stein 28465/10 US Bank 11/12/10 11/18/10 10/18/11

Filed by P

10/18/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/05/12, with

conferences ongoing

Notice of Appearance filed 03/04/11

162. Stein 29753/10 CitiCorp 11/29/10 12/07/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 3/7/11 – no

reason

163. Frenkel 27525/10 Bank of NY

11/01/10 11/17/10 No No No Answer filed 12/06/10

164. Frenkel 28185/10 Wells F 11/09/10 11/26/10 No No No

165. Frenkel 28198/10 Deutsche 11/09/10 12/21/10 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 1/6/12 9 – no

reason

166. Frenkel 28770/10 B of A 11/16/10 11/23/10 No No No

167. Frenkel 28894/10 JP Morgan 11/17/10 01/12/11 7/29/11

Filed by P

7/29/11 No Ecourts should but does not reflect this case

– may be mistranscribed index number

Order Signed – 9/14/11 – removed fromFCP due to D default

168. Frenkel 29686/10 Deutsche 11/26/10 01/12/11 No No No Supplemental Summons & Complaint filed

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank Datei

Aff of S i

RJI Due DlgAff

Ecourts Other

Page 53: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 53/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  18 

Filed Service Aff  Record

1/20/11

169. Rosicki 27503/10 Bank 

United

11/01/10 11/17/10 12/21/10

Filed by P

12/21/10 Yes Answer filed 11/23/10

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 04/19/11, buth/o defaulted

Order Signed 4/27/11 – removed from FCP

Order of Reference – 9/27/11

170. Rosicki 28203/10 Flagstar 11/09/10 11/22/10 12/14/10

Filed by P

12/14/10 Yes Answer filed 11/23/10

Notice of Appearance filed 3/24/11

Ecourts reflects 1

st

FSC 04/19/11, with07/19/11 FSC reflecting a trial modification

and a 12/01/11 FSC reflecting a permanent

modification

171. Rosicki 28941/10 CitiMtg 11/17/10 12/14/10 No No No

172. Rosicki 29058/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/01/01 No No No

173. Rosicki 29445/10 MetLife 11/23/10 12/07/10 No No No Aff/Stip of Discontinuance filed 01/21/11 –

no reason

Notice of Appearance filed 03/10/11174. Rosicki 29847/10 DLJ Mtg 11/30/10 12/08/10 01/05/11

Filed by P1/5/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1

stFSC 04/22/11, and a

subsequent 05/20/11 FSC, but h/o defaulted

for the 08/12/11 FSC

Order Signed 8/15/11 – removed from FCP

Order of Reference filed 2/1/12

175. Rosicki 29848/10 11/30/10 12/28/10 01/13/11 01/13/11Filed by P

1/13/11 Yes Answer filed 03/21/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 04/22/11, with

conferences ongoing

176. Katz 27528/10 US Bank 11/01/10 11/10/10 11/30/11

Filed by P

11/30/11 Yes Answer filed 11/19/10

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 01/18/12,

Order Signed 1/23/12 – removed from FCP

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank DateFil d

Aff of S i

RJI Due DlgAff

EcourtsR d

Other

Page 54: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 54/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  19 

Filed Service Aff  Record

because no mod offered

Notice of Appearance filed 1/25/12Motion to Dismiss filed by h/o 02/22/12

177. Katz –

 Atty Change 

– Hasbrew

12/20/11

28488/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 12/03/10 11/1/11

Filed by P

10/31/11 Yes Answer filed 12/22/10

Reply filed 12/29/10

Notice to Produce filed 1/4/11

Reply filed 3/9/11Stipulation filed 4/1/11

Ecourts reflects 1

st

FSC 12/19/11, withconferences ongoingh/o represented by Luis Echeeverria 718-

476-2700

178. Katz 29010/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/02/10 10/19/11

Filed by P

10/19/11 Yes Answer filed 12/20/10

Notice of Appearance

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 12/07/11, withconferences ongoing

179. Katz 29359/10 Deutsche 11/23/10 12/23/10 No No No180. Druckman 28892/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/30/10 No No No Answer filed 12/15/10

181. Druckman  28893/10 Wells F 11/17/10 No No No No

182. Druckman  29006/10 Wells F 11/18/10 11/30/10 No No No Answer filed 12/06/10Notice of Appearance filed 01/05/11

183. Druckman  29126/10 Wells F 11/19/10 03/01/11 No No No

184. Druckman  29257/10 Wells F 11/22/10 12/06/10 No No No Answer filed 12/07/10

185. Druckman

 Atty Change 29392/10 Wells F 11/23/10 12/21/10 No No No Reply to Counterclaims filed 7/7/11

Answer filed 7/12/11

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff

EcourtsRecord

Other

Page 55: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 55/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  20 

Filed Service Aff  Record

– Duoba

Law

186. Druckman  29571/10 BNY 11/24/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed 12/16/10

187. Pincus 27832/10 HSBC 11/05/10 11/10/10 11/22/11

Filed by P

11/22/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 01/13/12, with

conferences ongoing

188. Gess 27890/10 RBS 11/04/10 12/10/10 No No No

189. Berkman 28148/10 HSBC 11/08/10 12/17/10 No No No Aff/Stip of Discontinuance filed 01/11/11 –no reason

Notice of Appearance filed 02/22/11

190. Berkman 28830/10 BAC 11/16/10 11/23/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 03/04/11

191. Berkman 29530/10 BAC 11/24/10 12/10/10 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 12/16/10,

12/28/10 and 03/10/11

192. Delbello 28402/10 Wells F 11/12/10 No No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 5/31/11 – no

reason

193. Weinreb 28489/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 12/08/10 7/15/11Filed by P

7/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/01/11, buth/o defaulted

Order Signed 9/8/11 – remove from FCPJudge’s Memo on Oder of Ref filed 11/1/11

Judge’s Memo on Order of ref with changed

caption filed 1/26/12Ecourts reflects Court denied both motions– robosigning funny business?

194. Weinreb 28807/10 US Bank 11/16/10 12/06/10 7/21/11

Filed by P

7/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/20/11, but

h/o defaulted

Order Signed 9/26/11 – removed from FCP

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff

EcourtsRecord

Other

Page 56: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 56/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  21 

Filed Service Aff  Record

Order of Reference 11/7/11

195. Weinreb 28809/10 Deutsche 11/16/10 12/01/10 No 7/13/11 No No RJI = not in ecourts, even though DDAfiled

196. Weinreb 29166/10 Wells F 11/19/10 12/10/10 7/7/11

Filed by P

6/7/11 Yes Bank moved for Order of Ref 07/12/11

Order of Ref granted 07/20/11Why no FSC??

197. Weinreb 29575/10 Deutsche 11/24/10 12/22/10 No 8/4/11 No No RJI = not in ecourts, even though DDAfiled

198. Davidson 28895/10 US Bank 11/17/10 11/30/10 03/15/11Filed by P 3/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1

st

FSC held 05/04/11, buth/o defaulted

Order Signed 5/17/11 – Removed from FCPOrder of Ref Signed 5/24/11

Entry of Order filed 6/13/11

199. Davidson 29268/10 US Bank 11/22/10 12/02/10 No No No Stipulation to Discontinue filed 01/05/11 –

no reason

200. Roach 28938/10 Deutsche 11/17/10 11/30/10 7/26/11

Filed by P

7/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/06/11, but

h/o defaultedOrder Signed 9/13/11 – removed from FCP

Mtn to Extend Time to Answer – filed11/03/11 and signed 11/07/11

Motion (for what?) filed 10/14/11

Copy of Order filed 12/28/11Ecourts reflects FSC restored and

conference held 01/31/12

Order (for what?) Signed 2/1/12H/o atty – QVLP (Jose A. Polanco)

201. Stein 29573/10 US Bank 11/24/10 12/08/10 No No No Stipulation to Discontinue filed 03/07/11 –mtg reinstated

Queens County – November 2010

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff

EcourtsRecord

Other

Page 57: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 57/134

Last reviewed April 17, 2012  22 

Filed Service Aff  Record

202. Stein 29136/10 US Bank 11/19/10 12/07/10 No No No Answer filed 12/17/10

203. Solferino 29393/10 US Bank 11/23/10 12/06/10 No No No Answer filed 12/13/10

204. Sankel 29666/10 HSBC 11/26/10 12/15/10 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 5/18/11 – mtg

paid off  

205. Sheldon 29799/10 US Bank 11/29/10 12/17/10 01/13/11

Filed by P

1/13/11 Yes Answer filed 12/21/10

Notice of Substitution filed 4/7/11

Answer filed 04/12/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 04/19/11, but

h/o defaultedOrder Signed 4/27/11 – removed from FCP

Page 58: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 58/134

APPENDIX D

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of  RJI DD Aff Ecourt Other

Page 59: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 59/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 1

Filed Service Record

1.  Baum 4687/11 Wells F 3/1/11 3/25/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/27/11 – mtgmodified

2.  Baum 4915/11 Bank of NY 3/3/11 4/4/11 No No No

3.  Baum 5044/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/14/11 No No No

4.  Baum 5245/11 Wells F 3/8/11 3/17/11 No No No

5.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

GPO

12/27/11

5246/11 Wells F 3/8/11 3/21/11 8/22/11Filed by P

8/22/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/26/11

6.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Shapiro

12/22/11

5244/11 Wells F 3/8/11 3/17/11 10/19/11

Filed by P

10/19/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/17/12

7.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Fein1/26/12

5435/11 Metlife 3/9/11 3/18/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/1/11

8.  Baum 5548/11 Wells F 3/10/11 3/25/11 05/23/11

Filed by P

No Yes Motion coverpage filed 5/23/11

Affidavit of Service filed 7/22/11

Order discontinuing action filed 7/25/11 – mtg

reinstatedEcourts: No FCP Conference

9.  Baum –

 Atty ChangeRosicki

12/19/11

5791/11 Wells F 3/14/11 3/25/11 No No No

10.  Baum 5760/11 Wells F 3/14/11 3/24/11 5/5/11Filed by D

No Yes Motion coverpage filed 5/9/11Affidavit of service filed 5/13/11

Order filed 7/22/11

Motion to discontinue action filed 12/22/11 –

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Fil d

Aff of 

S i

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

R d

Other

Page 60: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 60/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 2

Filed Service Record

no reasonAmended Affidavit of Service filed 1/9/12Ecourts: No FCP Conference

11.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Katz

12/30/11

5768/11 Wells F 3/14/11 3/23/11Amd’ed:

7/6/11

12/9/11Filed by P

No Yes Answer filed 7/15/11Consent to Change attorney (Hinshaw) filed

7/27/11

Reply filed 8/2/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/20/12

12.  Baum 5907/11 Aurora 3/15/11 3/25/11 No No Yes Answer filed on 3/30/11Ecourts: Motion to Discontinue filed 4/9/12 -

no reason

13.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

Fein12/22/11

5981/11 US Bank 3/16/11 3/23/11 8/30/11

Filed by P

8/30/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 8/30/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/15/11 (D

defaulted 1/18/12)

14.  Baum 5982/11 Everhome 3/16/11 4/15/11 6/7/11Filed by P

6/7/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11Amended Aff of Service filed 5/16/11 &

5/27/11

Directive filed 8/11/11 – mtg reinstatedMotion to discontinue coverpage filed 8/17/11 -

mtg reinstated

Decision and order filed 10/13/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/12/11

15.  Baum 6098/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/29/11 No No No Ecourts file and Clerk Minutes file do notcorrespond (clerk minutes show f/c action;

ecourts shows non-f/c action)

16.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Davidson F1/19/11

6191/11 Citimtg 3/18/11 3/30/11 4/22/11

Filed by P

4/22/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 6/7/11

Rejection of Answer filed 6/9/11

Affidavit of Service filed 6/23/11Answer filed 6/23/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Fil d

Aff of 

S i

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

R d

Other

Page 61: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 61/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 3

Filed Service Record

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/2/1117.  Baum –

 Atty Change

GPO12/27/2011

7224/11 BofA 3/30/11 4/11/11 6/15/11

Filed by P

6/15/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/21/11

18.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Zeichner

11/21/11

6366/11 GMAC 3/21/11 4/11/11 6/10/11Filed by P

6/10/11 Yes Answer filed 4/1/11Reply filed 4/27/11

Discovery demands filed 5/13/11

Referee’s directive filed 12/16/11- removedfrom FCP – no reason

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/20/11

19.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Fein12/7/11

6324/11 Wells F 3/21/11 3/30/11 6/22/11

Filed by P

6/22/11 Yes Ltr filed 11/14/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/27/11

20.  Baum –

 Atty Change

GPO

12/27/11

6703/11 Wells F 3/24/11 8/17/11 9/30/11Filed by P

No Yes Notices of Appearance filed 5/19/11 & 8/18/11Notice of Pendency refiled 8/25/11

Motion for service by publication filed 10/7/11

Order for publication service filed 12/1/11Ecourts: No FCP Conference

21.  Baum 6701/11 Wells F 3/24/11 4/7/11 1/20/12Filed by P

No Yes Motion filed 1/20/12Order discontinuing action filed 2/10/12 – mtg

modified

Ecourts: No FCP ConferenceBaum –

 Atty Change

Frenkel

1/24/12

6835/11 OneWest 3/25/11 NONE No No No

22.  Baum –

 Atty Change

6976/11 Wells F 3/28/11 4/20/11 7/18/11

Filed by P

7/18/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 9/15/11

Motion coverpage filed 9/27/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 62: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 62/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 4

Filed Service Record

Rosicki12/14/11

Referee’s directive filed 11/4/11Consent to Change D’s Attorney filed 1/3/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/11/11

23.  Baum –

 Atty Change

McCabe

7130/11 US Bank 3/29/11 4/7/11 6/7/11Filed by P

6/7/11 Yes Referee’s directive filed 12/1/11 – removedfrom FCP at D’s request

Ecourts: First FCP Conference7/12/11

24.  Baum –

 Atty Change

McCabe12/22/11

7184/11 Wells F 3/30/11 4/12/11 8/12/11

Filed by P

8/12/11

&

10/4/11

Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/20/11

Reply filed 6/2/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/5/11

25.  Baum –

 Atty Change

GPO

12/27/11

7186/11 HSBC 3/30/11 4/12/11 7/18/11Filed by P

7/18/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/11/11

26.  Baum –

 Atty Change Shapiro

12/22/11

7344/11 Wells F 3/31/11 4/21/11 8/30/11

Filed by P

8/30/11 Yes Answer filed 5/6/11

Affidavit of Service filed 6/1/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/15/11

27.  Baum 7295/11 HSBC 3/31/11 4/11/11 7/1/11

Filed by P

7/1/11 Yes Motion coverpage filed 12/19/11

Ecourts: No FCP Conference

28.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Leopold

11/25/11

7297/11 Wells F 3/31/11 6/10/11 8/22/11

Filed by P

8/22/11 Yes Suppl. S&C filed 5/11/11

Notice of Pendency filed 5/11/11Notice of Appearance filed 5/20/11

Answer filed 7/18/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/6/11

29.  Baum –

 Atty Change

McCabe

12/7/11 

7294/11 Wells F 3/31/11 4/11/11 8/15/11

Filed by P

8/15/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/5/11

30.  Fein 4731/11 BofA 3/1/11 3/22/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/4/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 63: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 63/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 5

Filed Service Record

31.  Fein 4727/11 BofA 3/1/11 3/9/11 No No No Reply filed on 3/28/1132.  Fein 4729/11 Chase 3/1/11 3/7/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/5/11

33.  Fein 4725/11 Chase 3/1/11 3/7/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 2/9/12 – loss

mitigation

34.  Fein 4730/11 WM Spl 3/1/11 3/21/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 3/16/11

35.  Fein –

 Atty Change

McCabe

1/19/12

4726/11 PNC 3/1/11 3/28/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/12/11Reply filed 4/20/11

Notice of Appearance filed 5/9/11

36.  Fein 4827/11 Chase 3/2/11 3/15/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 6/24/11 – mtg paid

off 

37.  Fein 4953/11 Deutsche 3/3/11 3/21/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 11/23/11 – mtgmodified

38.  Fein 4955/11 Deutsche 3/3/11 3/18/11 11/7/11Filed by P

11/7/11 Yes Answer filed on 3/22/11Amended Answer filed on 4/11/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/28/1239.  Fein 5062/11 US Bank 3/4/11 3/17/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/30/11

40.  Fein 5074/11 Chase 3/4/11 3/14/11 6/10/11Filed by D

No Yes Answer filed on 3/22/11Motion filed by D on 6/10/11

Motion to Cancel Lis Pendes filed by P on

1/18/12 – unable to know why (coverpage filed)Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/6/11

41.  Fein 5061/11 Chase 3/4/11 3/14/11 No No No

42.  Fein 5172/11 BofA 3/7/11 3/21/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/31/11Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 1/13/12 – mtg

reinstated

43.  Fein 5204/11 HSBC 3/7/11 3/14/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/7/11

Reply filed on 4/14/11

44.  Fein 5205/11 Onewest 3/7/11 3/21/11 10/4/11

Filed by P

10/4/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 3/24/11

Answer filed 5/18/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 64: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 64/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 6

Filed Service Record

Rejection of Answer filed 7/7/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/17/12

45.  Fein 5292/11 Chase 3/8/11 3/21/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/30/11

46.  Fein 5305/11 PNC 3/8/11 4/15/11 No No No Answer filed 1/10/12

47.  Fein 5304/11 PNC 3/8/11 3/31/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 4/13/11

Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 11/23/11 &

12/17/11 – mtg sold to another entity

48.  Fein 5541/11 Chase 3/10/11 3/21/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 7/15/11 –

discreprency relating to service49.  Fein 5696/11 Chase 3/11/11 3/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 4/12/11

50.  Fein 5799/11 BofA 3/14/11 3/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/27/11

51.  Fein 5905/11 Chase 3/15/11 3/29/11 No No No

52.  Fein 6011/11 Chase 3/16/11 3/28/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/1/11

Verified Answer filed on 4/11/11

Reply filed on 4/12/11

53. 

Fein 6113/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/31/11 No No No54.  Fein 6264/11 Chase 3/18/11 3/28/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 7/18/11 – mtg

reinstated

55.  Fein 6299/11 BofA 3/18/11 3/31/11 No No No Answer filed 5/13/11

56.  Fein 6504/11 Saxon 3/22/11 3/31/11 No No No

57.  Fein 6487/11 Chase 3/22/11 4/1/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 4/27/11 & 6/9/11Reply filed 5/9/11

Amended reply filed 6/23/11

58.  Fein 6829/11 Chase 3/25/11 4/4/11 No No No59.  Fein 7134/11 Chase 3/29/11 4/11/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/15/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11

60.  Fein 7132/11 BofA 3/29/11 4/15/11 No No No Answer filed 5/20/11

61.  Fein 7271/11 Chase 3/30/11 4/20/11 No No No Answer with counterclaims filed on 4/11/11

62.  Fein 7270/11 Chase 3/30/11 4/11/11 No No No

63.  Fein 7269/11 PNC 3/30/11 4/19/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 7/15/11 – no

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 65: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 65/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 7

S

reason64.  Fein 7378/11 Chase 3/31/11 4/6/11 No No No

65.  Rosicki 4746/11 Chase 3/1/11 3/10/11 No No No Verified answer filed on 3/24/11

Reply to Counterclaim and afft of serivce

4/8/11

66.  Rosicki 4882/11 Flagstar

Bank FSB

3/2/11 3/11/11 3/25/11

Filed by P

3/25/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/16/11

67.  Rosicki 4883/11 Nationstar

Mortgage

3/2/11 3/22/11 7/5/11

Filed by P

7/5/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/4/11

68.  Rosicki 4975/11 US Bank 3/3/11 3/18/11 No No No

69.  Rosicki 4977/11 Chase 3/3/11 3/14/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/5/11

70.  Rosicki 4976/11 Fifth Third 3/3/11 3/14/11 No No No

71.  Rosicki 5114/11 Bayview 3/4/11 3/16/11 9/20/11

Filed by P

9/20/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 1/23/12

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/26/11

72. 

Rosicki 5111/11 Bankunited 3/4/11 3/14/11 4/14/11Filed by P No Yes Motion Coverpage Fee 4/14/11Decision and order filed 8/8/11

Ecourts: No FCP Conference

73.  Rosicki 5212/11 Freedom 3/7/11 3/23/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 5/24/11 – no

reason

74.  Rosicki 5214/11 BofNY 3/7/11 3/18/11 11/28/11Filed by P

11/28/11 Yes Answer filed on 3/29/11Reply to counterclaim 4/14/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/21/12

75.  Rosicki 5394/11 KondaurCapital

3/8/11 4/6/11 7/27/11Filed by P

7/27/11 Yes Reply filed 4/20/11Answer filed 5/4/11

Notice of Appearance filed 9/15/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference8/18/11

76.  Rosicki 5393/11 Mariner 3/8/11 3/17/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11

77.  Rosicki 5693/11 Chase 3/11/11 3/29/11 No No No Answer filed 5/10/11

78.  Rosicki 5694/11 Chase 3/11/11 3/29/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/29/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 66: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 66/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 8

79.  Rosicki 5695/11 Chase 3/11/11 3/29/11 No No No80.  Rosicki 5808/11 PNC Bank 3/14/11 3/28/11 8/8/11

Filed by P

8/8/11 Yes Affirmation filed 10/31/11

Consent to Change Attorney for D filed 1/23/12

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/25/11

81.  Rosicki 5809/11 Chase

HomeFinance

3/14/11 3/30/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/6/11

82.  Rosicki 5807/11 Chase 3/14/11 3/28/11 No No No

83.  Rosicki 6030/11 Chase 3/16/11 4/21/11 No No No Ltr filed 5/3/1184.  Rosicki 6028/11 Bayview 3/16/11 3/30/11 No No No

85.  Rosicki 6031/11 Chase 3/16/11 3/28/11 No No No Answer Filed 4/20/11

86.  Rosicki 6285/11 US Nationl 3/18/11 3/28/11 No No No

87.  Rosicki 6284/11 US Nationl 3/18/11 3/31/11 7/6/11

Filed by P

7/6/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 8/11/11

Aff of Service filed 10/19/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/4/11

88. 

Rosicki 6274/11 Chase 3/18/11 4/11/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/26/1189.  Rosicki 6609/11 Chase

Home

Finance

3/23/11 3/31/11 No No No Answer filed 4/6/11

Replies to Counterclaim 4/19/11 & 4/29/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/29/11

90.  Rosicki 6610/11 Chase 3/23/11 4/19/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/20/11

91.  Rosicki 6608/11 Gmac 3/23/11 4/12/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 8/5/11 – no reason

92.  Rosicki 6831/11 JPMC 3/15/11 4/7/11 No No No Notices of Appearances field 5/5/11 & 5/20/11

93.  Rosicki 6858/11 Chase 3/25/11 4/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11

94.  Rosicki 6857/11 Chase 3/25/11 4/5/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/20/1195.  Rosicki 7109/11 US Bank 3/29/11 4/8/11 4/19/11

Filed by P

4/19/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/2/11

96.  Rosicki 7108/11 Chase 3/29/11 4/14/11 No No No Reply filed 5/2/11

Answer filed 5/10/11

97.  Rosicki 7245/11 Citibank 3/30/11 4/28/11 No No No Answer filed 4/25/11 & 4/28/11

Reply filed 7/5/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 67: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 67/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 9

Notice of Appearance filed 7/21/1198.  Rosicki 7405/11 Chase 3/31/11 4/19/11 No No No

99.  Rosicki 7404/11 LPP Mortg 3/31/11 4/19/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 10/18/11

100. Rosicki 7403/11 BankUnited 3/31/11 4/13/11 6/6/11Filed by P

6/6/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/13/11

101. Rosicki 7401/11 Mellon 3/31/11 4/13/11 No No No Answer filed 7/19/11Notice of Return filed 8/2/11

Consent to Change Attorney filed 1/18/12 – D’s

attorney102. Shapiro 4826/11 US National 3/2/11 3/16/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/12/11

Reply filed 5/3/11

103. Shapiro 4871/11 Everbank 3/2/11 3/21/11 4/26/11Filed by P

4/26/11&

5/11/11

Yes Answer filed 3/23/11Notice of Appearance filed 6/13/11

Motion coverpage filed 7/26/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/6/11

104. Shapiro 4957/11 US National 3/3/11 3/21/11 2/15/12Filed by P No Yes Motion coverpage filed 2/15/12 for order forexpedient service

Ecourts: No FCP Conference

105. Shapiro 5180/11 Wells Fargo 3/7/11 3/23/11 8/1/11Filed by P

8/1/11 Yes Motion coverpage filed 9/2/11 for order of ref Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/22/11

106. Shapiro –

 Atty Change

Schuyler

Kraus

5546/11 Wells Fargo 3/10/11 3/25/11 No No No Answer and Counterclaim filed on 3/29/11Reply filed 4/27/2011

107. Shapiro 5669/11 Merrill Lyn 3/11/11 3/24/11 No No No

108. Shapiro 5670/11 Deutsche B 3/11/11 3/31/11 6/6/11

Filed by P

No Yes RJI filed on 6/6/11 by D

Motion for Order of Ref Filed 12/6/2011

Referee’s Directive filed 12/16/2011 – removedfrom FCP due to insufficient income

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/12/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 68: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 68/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 10

109. Shapiro 5667/11 Deutsche B 3/11/11 3/22/11 No No No Amended Aff of Service filed on 3/25/11Notice of Appearance 4/13/11

110. Shapiro 5800/11 Chase 3/14/11 3/28/11 No No No Answer and Counterclaim filed on 4/6/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11Reply filed 5/20/11

Notice of Co-Counsel (Bomchpnsky) filed

5/20/11

111. Shapiro 5797/11 Chase

Home Fin

3/14/11 3/21/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 6/2/11 – no reason

112. Shapiro 5798/11 Chase

Home Fin

3/14/11 3/23/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/18/11

113. Shapiro 5908/11 Chase 3/15/11 4/1/11 No No No

114. Shapiro 5904/11 Chase 3/15/11 3/24/11 2/15/12

Filed by P

No Yes Amended Aff of Service filed on 3/30/11

Motion coverpage filed by P 2/16/12 – can’t tellwhat it is

Ecourts: Motion return date 3/9/12 - motion to

discontinue - no reason; No FCP Conference

115. Shapiro 6006/11 Chase 3/16/11 4/6/11 6/10/11

Filed by P

6/10/11 Yes Amended Aff of Service filed on 4/6/11 &

5/25/11Motion coverpage filed by P 8/31/11 – order of 

reference

Motion coverpage filed by P 2/16/12 – can’t tellwhat it is

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/20/11116. Shapiro 6016/11 Chase 3/16/11 5/12/11 12/27/11

Filed by P

No Yes Motion/Stip to Discontinue filed 12/27/11 – no

reason

Ecourts: Motion return 12/27/11

117. Shapiro 6263/11 Chase

Home Fin

3/18/11 3/25/11 No No No Motion/Stip to Discontinue filed on 12/13/11 –

no reason

118. Shapiro 6300/11 Deutsche B 3/18/11 4/1/11 No No No

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 69: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 69/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 11

119. Shapiro 6298/11 HSBC 3/18/11 4/6/11 No No No Answer filed 4/18/11120. Shapiro 6388/11 Chase 3/21/11 4/1/11 No No No

121. Shapiro 6503/11 HSBC 3/22/11 4/1/11 No No No

122. Shapiro 6492/11 Chase 3/22/11 4/4/11 No No No

123. Shapiro 6488/11 Chase

Home Fin

3/22/11 3/31/11 No No No

124. Shapiro 6588/11 Chase

Home Fin

3/23/11 4/11/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 4/15/11

Reply Filed on 5/10/11

Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 9/16/11 – noreason

125. Shapiro 6589/11 Mellon 3/23/11 8/12/11 10/28/11

Filed by P

10/28/11 Yes Notice of Pendency filed 9/19/11

Amended Aff of Service filed 9/23/11Motion coverpage filed by P 12/8/11 – order of 

reference

Order of reference withdrawn 1/26/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/25/12

126. Shapiro 6576/11 ChaseHome Fin

3/23/11 4/6/11 11/3/11Filed by P

No Yes Motion/Stip to Discontinue filed 11/4/11 – noreason

Order to Discontinue 12/21/11

Order to cancel LP filed 1/25/11

Ecourts: Motion return date 12/2/11; no FCPConference

127. Shapiro 6677/11 Residential 3/24/11 4/8/11 5/3/11

Filed by P

5/3/11 &

5/11/11

Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11

Motion coverpage filed by P on 6/2/11 – orderof reference

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/6/11

128. Shapiro 6718/11 Chase 3/24/11 4/4/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 4/12/11Reply filed 5/5/11

129. Shapiro 6828/11 US National 3/25/11 4/12/11 11/23/11Filed by P

No Yes Motion/Stip to Discontinue filed 11/30/11 – noreason

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 70: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 70/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 12

Ecourts: Motion return date 12/2/11; no FCPConference

130. Shapiro 6980/11 Merrill 3/28/11 4/11/11 11/9/11

Filed by P

11/9/11 No Notice of Appearance filed 4/25/11

Verified Answer filed 10/26/11Ecourts: No FCP Conference

131. Shapiro 6974/11 US National 3/28/11 4/11/11 No No No Verified Answer filed 5/11/11Demand for notice & inspection filed 5/11/11

132. Shapiro 7136/11 US National 3/29/11 4/6/11 No No No

133. Shapiro 7135/11 Deutsche 3/29/11 4/12/11 No No No134. Shapiro 7242/11 Phh

Mortgage

3/30/11 4/28/11 No No No Notices of Appearance Filed 4/20/11 & 5/23/11

Reply filed 5/16/11Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 10/4/11 - no reason

135. Shapiro 7257/11 Chase 3/30/11 4/5/11 No No No

136. Shapiro 7258/11 Chase 3/30/11 4/20/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 10/11/11 – D didnot answer or appear/no reason

137. Shapiro 7376/11 Chase 3/31/11 4/22/11 No No No Answer filed 6/6/11Notice to Produce filed 6/6/11

Demand for Appearance filed 6/6/11

Aff of Service filed 6/6/11

138. Dorf 

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

4869/11 HSBC 3/2/11 3/24/11 No No No Notices and Appearance and claim to surplus

monies filed on 3/23/11 & 5/5/11

139. Dorf  Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

5054/11 Wells Fargo 3/4/11 4/6/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 4/6/11

140. Dorf 5055/11 HSBC 3/4/11 NONE No No No

141. Dorf 

 Atty Change

5051/11 HSBC 3/4/11 3/24/11 No No Yes Answer filed 4/20/11Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 71: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 71/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 13

Leopold12/8/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/22/12

142. Dorf 

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

5854/11 HSBC 3/15/11 4/1/11 No No No

143. Dorf 5853/11 HSBC 3/15/11 4/15/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/12/11

Stipulation to extend time for D WF to respond

filed on 4/19/11Verified Answer by D WF filed on 5/17/11

Stipulation dropping WF as Defendant filed

7/6/11

144. Dorf Atty

Change

Leopold

12/8/11

5979/11 US Nationl 3/16/11 4/25/11 No No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/22/12

145. Dorf 5980/11 Wells Fargo 3/16/11 4/11/11 No No Yes Notice of appearance filed on 4/1/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/26/12

146. Dorf 6199/11 HSBC 3/18/11 4/13/11 No No No

147. Dorf 

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

6198/11 HSBC 3/18/11 12/5/11 No No No

148. Dorf 6342/11 HSBC 3/21/11 4/12/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11Reply to Counter Claims w/ D’s Answer filed

5/9/11

149. Dorf 

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

6764/11 US Bank 3/25/11 4/13/11 No No No

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 72: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 72/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 14

150. Dorf  Atty Change

Leopold

12/13/11

6765/11 HSBC 3/25/11 4/7/11 7/19/11Filed by D 10/7/11 Yes Motion to dismiss coverpage filed by D on7/19/11Orders filed 12/13/11 & 1/18/12

Order to adjourn filed 3/8/12

Motion papers withdrawn 4/10/12Ecourts: Motion return date 8/18/11 (adj several

times; withdrawn 3/13/12); No FCP Conference

151. Dorf 6768/11 HSBC 3/25/11 NONE No No No

152. Dorf  Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

6913/11 HSBC 3/28/11 4/13/11 12/30/11Filed by P

12/30/11 Yes Verified Answer filed 5/3/11Aff of Service filed 5/3/11

Reply to counterclaims filed 6/3/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/28/12

153. Dorf 

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

6911/11 HSBC 3/28/11 4/6/11 No No No

154. Dorf 6910/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/29/11 No No No

155. Dorf  

 Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

6909/11 Bank Nat 3/28/11 4/14/11 No No No Reply to Counterclaims filed 6/9/11 (no answerfiled)

156. Dorf  

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

6908/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/14/11 2/17/12

Filed by P

2/17/12 Yes Motion coverpage filed by P on 2/17/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/17/12

157. Dorf 

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

6906/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/6/11 No No No

158. Dorf 6905/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/6/11 No No No Answer filed 9/8/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 73: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 73/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 15

159. Dorf  Atty Change

Leopold

12/8/11

6904/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/14/11 3/8/12Filed by P 3/8/12 Yes Motion coverpage order of ref filed by P 3/8/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/2/12

160. Dorf 

 Atty Change

Leopold12/8/11

7205/11 HSBC 3/30/11 4/19/11 No No No

161. McCabe 4829/11 Bank Natio 3/2/11 3/17/11 10/14/11Filed by P

10/14/11 Yes Answer filed 8/18/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/17/12

162. McCabe 4954/11 Bank Natio 3/3/11 4/13/11 No No No

163. McCabe 4956/11 Bank Natio 3/3/11 3/17/11 10/6/11Filed by P

10/6/11&

12/9/11

Yes Amended affidavit of service filed on 3/22/11Notices of Appearance filed on 5/5/11 &

12/14/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/31/12

164. McCabe 5067/11 Deutsche 3/4/11 3/23/11 No No No Stip/Affirm Discontinuing Action Filed 12/8/11

& 12/13/11 - no reason

165. McCabe 5192/11 Bank Natio 3/7/11 3/24/11 No No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/12/12

166. McCabe 5301/11 HSBC 3/8/11 3/24/11 9/14/11

Filed by P

9/14/11 No Answer filed on 3/30/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/29/11

167. McCabe 5300/11 Bank Natio 3/8/11 3/23/11 2/2/12

Filed by P

2/2/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/11/12

168. McCabe 5462/11 HSBC 3/9/11 3/24/11 5/4/11

Filed by P

5/4/11 No Stip/Affirm Discontinuing Action Filed 10/6/11

– no reason169. McCabe 5778/11 Aurora 3/14/11 3/30/11 No No No

170. McCabe 5773/11 Aurora 3/14/11 3/21/11 No No No

171. McCabe 5774/11 Mellon 3/14/11 10/5/11 No No No

172. McCabe 5777/11 Citibank 3/14/11 3/30/11 No No No

173. McCabe 6826/11 Aurora 3/25/11 4/27/11 4/16/12

Filed by P

4/16/12 Yes Answer filed 9/28/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 74: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 74/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 16

174. McCabe 6825/11 Aurora 3/25/11 4/27/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11Verified Answer filed 5/27/11Reply to counterclaims filed 8/30/11

175. McCabe 7346/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 4/14/11 No No No

176. Frenkel 4952/11 Wells Fargo 3/3/11 4/12/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 3/24/11

177. Frenkel 5066/11 US Nation 3/4/11 3/15/11 No No No

178. Frenkel 5193/11 Oceanfirst 3/7/11 3/22/11 5/13/11

Filed by P

5/13/11 Yes RJI filed on 5/13/2011

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/14/11179. Frenkel 5550/11 Onewest 3/10/11 3/30/11 11/10/11

Filed by P

11/10/11 Yes Answer with counterclaims filed 1/3/12

Notice of rejection filed 1/17/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/21/12

180. Frenkel 5886/11 Duetsche 3/15/11 3/23/11 9/23/11

Filed by D

No Yes Notice of appearance and answer filed 4/20/11

Motion coverpage filed by D filed on 9/23/11

Order granting leave to file late answer filed on

11/21/11Verified reply to counterclaims filed 12/22/11

Motion coverpage filed by D on 2/6/12

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/22/12 (aftermotion practice heard; thus do not count in FCP

date)

181. Frenkel 6118/11 Wells Fargo 3/17/11 8/5/11 12/1/11

Filed by P

12/1/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/21/12

182. Frenkel 6117/11 Deutsche 3/17/11 3/24/11 12/15/11Filed by P 12/15/11 Yes Notice of Appearance & surplus monies filed5/10/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/11/12

183. Frenkel 6225/11 Wells Fargo 3/18/11 3/29/11 No No No Stip/Affirm Discontinuing Action Filed

11/10/11 – no reason

184. Weinreb 4855/11 Wells Fargo 3/2/11 3/18/11 7/21/11Filed by P

7/21/11 Yes Notice of Appearance & Surplus Monies filed4/27/11

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 75: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 75/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 17

Motion coverpage filed 7/21/11 by PEcourts: listed in ecourts but reflects noprogress in the case

185. Weinreb 4924/11 Wells Fargo 3/3/11 3/22/11 7/15/11Filed by P

7/15/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/2/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/11/11

186. Weinreb

 Atty Change

Katz

9/13/11

4925/11 Bank Natio 3/3/11 3/30/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 4/1/11

187. Weinreb 5757/11 Wells Fargo 3/14/11 3/25/11 8/26/11

Filed by P

8/26/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/29/11

188. Weinreb 6197/11 Wells Fargo 3/18/11 3/29/11 9/20/11Filed by P

9/20/11 Yes Affidavit & Affirm filed on 8/29/11Motion coverpage filed by P on 9/20/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/27/11

189. Weinreb 6339/11 Deutsche 3/21/11 4/13/11 10/28/11

Filed by P

No Yes Motion coverpgae filed by P on 10/28/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/24/12

190. Stiene 4921/11 Chase 3/3/11 3/29/11 No No No Notice of appearance and claim to surplus

monies filed on 3/29/11

191. Stiene 5243/11 Flagstar 3/8/11 3/24/11 8/3/11

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/18/11

192. Stiene 5525/11 Flagstar 3/10/11 6/6/11 8/3/11

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/29/11

193. Stiene 5524/11 Flagstar 3/10/11 3/24/11 7/25/11

Filed by P

7/25/11 Yes Answer filed on 3/23/11

D Interrogs filed 6/8/11Notice of Appearance filed 12/2/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/8/11

194. Stiene 6343/11 Chase 3/21/11 4/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance and claims for surplus

monies filed 5/6/11

195. Steine

 Atty Change

6566/11 Flagstar 3/23/11 5/27/11 No No No

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 76: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 76/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 18

Knuckles1/9/12

196. Steine 6668/11 Chase 3/24/11 4/25/11 3/15/12

Filed by P

3/15/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/15/12

197. Stiene 6912/11 Flagstar 3/28/11 4/22/11 8/9/11

Filed by P

8/9/11 Yes Verified Answer filed 6/6/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/12/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/25/11

198. Stein 4721/11 US Nation 3/1/11 3/16/11 No No No

199. Stein 6283/11 US Nation 3/18/11 3/28/11 8/9/11Filed by P

8/9/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/18/11Verified Answer with counterclaim filed on

4/19/11 & 4/27/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/25/11

200. Stein 6593/11 Chase 3/23/11 3/30/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11

201. Stein 6715/11 Financial

Freedom

3/24/11 3/31/11 12/14/11

Filed by P

12/14/11

& 2/6/12

Yes Verified Answer filed on 4/15/11

Notices of appearance filed on 4/15/11 &

5/5/11Motion coverpage filed by p on 12/14/11

Ecourts: Motion return date 3/7/12; no FCP

conference

202. Stein 6970/11 Everbank 3/28/11 4/11/11 5/16/11

Filed by P

5/16/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 9/27/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/29/11 (H/Odefault 7/14/11)

203. Stein 7360/11 Financial

Freedom

3/31/11 5/9/11 No No No Notice of Appearance & surplus monies filed

4/27/11204. Stein 7361/11 Chase

Home

Finance

3/31/11 4/28/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 4/27/11, 5/5/11,

5/20/11

205. Derose 4714/11 Deutsche 3/1/11 3/30/11 12/2/11

Filed by P

12/2/11 Yes Verified answer filed on 3/16/11

Notices of Appearance filed 5/5/11 & 5/19/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/7/12

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 77: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 77/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 19

206. Derose 5660/11 HSBC 3/11/11 4/1/11 No No No207. Derose 5661/11 HSBC 3/11/11 3/28/11 No No No Stip to Discontinue Action filed 5/6/11 – paid

arrears

208. Derose 6536/11 Deutsche 3/30/11 5/6/11 7/21/11

Filed by P

7/21/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11

Affirm filed 6/28/11

Motion coverpage filed by P on 12/12/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 9/14/11

209. Berkman 5389/11 Central

Mortgage

3/8/11 3/29/11 No No No Reply to counterclaims filed 4/20/11

210. Berkman 5710/11 Federal

National

3/11/11 3/17/11 No No No

211. Berkman 6553/11 Central

Mortgage

3/23/11 4/28/11 1/25/12

Filed by P

1/25/12 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/16/12

212. Druckman 6378/11 BofNY 3/21/11 4/14/11 No No No

213. Druckman 6973/11 US Bank 3/28/11 5/4/11 No No No

214. Druckman 7379/11 Wells Fargo 3/31/11 4/14/11 No No No Stip to Discontinue Action filed 11/1/11 – loanmod

215. Stagg 7400/11 Mid-islandMorg

3/31/11 7/5/11 4/6/11Filed by P

4/6/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/19/11

216. Stagg 7402/11 Mid-islandMorg

3/31/11 4/6/11 No No No Notice of appear/waiver filed on 4/6/11Stip to Discontinue filed on 5/31/11 – loan mod

217. Harris 5551/11 Emigrant 3/10/11 3/24/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/29/11, amend on 4/12/11

Reply filed 5/11/11

218. Schiller 4688/11 MT bank 3/1/11 5/19/11 7/11/11Filed by P

7/11/11 Yes Answer filed on 3/25/11Reply filed 6/20/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/9/11

219. Schiller 6099/11 Suntrust 3/17/11 3/25/11 10/25/11

Filed by P

10/25/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11

Affidavot of Service filed 6/15/11Motion coverpage filed by P (order of ref) filed

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 78: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 78/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 20

10/25/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 12/14/11

220. Davidson 6695/11 Wells Fargo 3/24/11 3/31/11 No No No Verified answer filed on 4/6/11

Stip to Discontinue filed on 6/13/11 – mtgreinstated

221. Platzer 6017/11 Chase 3/16/11 NONE No No No Stip to Discontinue filed on 2/7/12 - no reason

222. Weisberg

 Atty Change

Bryan Cave7/11/11

7081/11 Bac HomeLoans

3/29/11 4/14/11 No No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/1/12

223. Weisberg 7080/11 BofA 3/29/11 4/14/11 No No No Answer & Aff of Service filed 5/20/11

Supplement to Answer & Aff of Service filed5/27/11

Reply to counterclaim filed 6/7/11

Supplemental Answer to counterclaim filed

6/9/11

224. Cohn 6682/11 BofA 3/24/11 4/8/11 4/8/11

Filed by P

4/8/11 Yes Stip to Discontinue filed 6/29/11 – loan mod

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/19/11

225. Hiscock 6827/11 Bayview 03/25/11 4/27/11 No No No

226. Graham 6491/11 Astoria Fed 3/22/11 4/15/11 7/25/11

Unable toView RJI

Unable

to View

Yes Unable to open RJI filing in clerk minutes

Motion coverpage filed by P 3/1/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/18/11

227. May 5241/11 Bank Natio 3/8/11 12/15/11 2/15/12

Filed by P

2/15/11 Yes Verified reply filed 4/26/11

Motion coverpage filed by P on 2/16/12Ecourts: Motion for order of reference 2/27/12;

no FCP Conference

228. Katz 6005/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 4/1/11 10/28/11

Filed by P

10/28/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/14/12

229. Rosenblum 6927/11 Flatbush 3/28/11 4/7/11 6/9/11 6/9/11 Yes Motion coverpage (order of ref) filed by P on

Kings County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Page 79: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 79/134

Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 21

Fed Savings Filed by P 6/9/11Answer filed 7/6/11D Consents to Change attorney 1/23/12

Directive (for good faith hearing) filed 5/3/12

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/20/11

230. Roach 5112/11 Wells Fargo 3/4/11 4/1/11 1/23/12

Filed by P

1/23/11 Yes Answer filed 4/4/11

Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/4/12

Page 80: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 80/134

APPENDIX E

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

1 Baum - Atty 5087/11 Deutsche 3/1/11 3/18/11 6/15/11 6/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 8/11/11

Page 81: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 81/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 1

1.  Baum - Atty

Change -Rosicki

12/20/11

5087/11 Deutsche 3/1/11 3/18/11 6/15/11

Filed by P

6/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 8/11/11

Order signed 8/16/11 - Removed from FCP due toD default

Order of Reference filed 9/12/11

Notice of Entry filed 10/7/11

2.  Baum - Atty

Change -Rosicki

12/7/11

5213/11 Wells F 3/2/11 3/10/11 11/1/11

Filed by P

11/1/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 1/4/12 in Pilot Project

Answer & Counterclaims filed 3/14/11Notice of Appearance filed 4/7/11

Reply to Answer & Counterclaims filed 4/7/113.  Baum

 Atty Change 

- Frenkel1/13/12

5214/11 Wells F 3/2/11 4/4/11 8/5/11

Filed by P

8/5/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 9/26/11

Order Signed 10/5/11 - Removed from FCP

because not owner occupied

4.  Baum

 Atty Change 

- GPO

12/29/11

5215/11 US Bank 3/2/11 3/18/11 7/15/11Filed by P

7/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 9/22/11Order signed 9/26/11 - removed from FCP due to D

default

5.  Baum 5344/11 Deutsche 3/3/11 3/15/11 No No No

6.  Baum 5436/11 Metlife 3/4/11 3/18/11 No No No

7.  Baum 5437/11 Metlife 3/4/11 3/14/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/28/11

8.  Baum 5439/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/16/11 8/19/11Filed by P

8/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/6/11 and loanreinstated

Notice of Appearance filed 9/20/11

Notices of Motion to Discontinue filed 1/17/12 &2/9/12

9.  Baum 5440/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/16/11 No No No

10.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Fein

1/19/12

5441/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/16/11 7/15/11Filed by P

7/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/22/11Notice of Appearance filed on 10/21/11

Order Signed 11/9/11 - removed from FCP because

D failed to show sufficient income

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Answer filed 12/13/11

Page 82: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 82/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 2

Answer filed 12/13/11

H/o atty is George Russo 718-849-6900

11.  Baum - Atty

Change -Rosicki

12/22/11

5442/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/16/11 10/14/11

Filed by P

10/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 12/01/11 and is

ongoingNotices of Appearance filed 3/21/11 & 4/19/11

12.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Berkman12/7/11

5554/11 Wells F 3/7/11 3/21/11 9/23/11

Filed by P

9/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/09/11 and is

ongoing

Notice of Appearance filed on 12/21/11Notice of Motion to Extend Time to Answer filed

1/11/12

13.  Baum 5555/11 M&T 3/7/11 3/18/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/9/11 - D paid off 

mtg

14.  Baum 5696/11 Wells F 3/8/11 3/18/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/9/11 - "work out"

15.  Baum -

 Atty Change 

- 12/6/11

5806/11 Wells F 3/9/11 3/23/11 8/17/11

Filed by P

8/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/05/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/22/11

Order signed 10/12/11 - removed from FCP due toD default

16.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Shapiro

1/27/12

5808/11 PNC 3/9/11 3/22/11 No No No Answer filed 3/31/11Reply to Counterclaims filed 4/18/11

17.  Baum 5934/11 Wells F 3/10/11 3/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11

18.  Baum

 Atty Change 

- Berkman12/6/11

5935/11 Wells F 3/10/11 3/22/11 No No No

19.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Rosicki

6040/11 Wells F 3/11/11 3/24/11 10/18/11

Filed by P

10/18/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/06/11

Answer filed 3/24/11

Ecourts reflects that case was ordered out of FSC

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

on 03/12/12 due to h/o default

Page 83: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 83/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 3

20.  Baum 6043/11 Wells F 3/11/11 3/24/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/31/11

Stipulation filed 3/31/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/26/11 - reinstatedmtg

21.  Baum 6048/11 Aurora 3/11/11 4/22/11 12/30/11

Filed by D

No Yes Ecourts reflects “f/c – No Conf”

LP re-filed 4/11/11

Amended Complaint filed 4/8/11

Notice of Motion to Discontinue filed 12/30/11Defendant atty – Alan Gitter (AG?) 212-341-2258

22.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Steine

Weiner12/6/11

6156/11 Wells F 3/14/11 3/24/11 8/2/11

Filed by P

8/2/11 No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11

No Ecourts Record

23.  Baum - Atty

Change -Knuckles

1/19/12

6302/11 Wells F 3/15/11 3/24/11 7/14/11

Filed by P

7/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 09/21/11

Answer filed 3/28/11Order Signed 12/6/11 - removed from FCP because

D's income insufficientH/o atty Alice Nicholson 800-323-3034

24.  Baum 6303/11 M&T 3/15/11 3/30/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/8/11 -reinstated

mtg

25.  Baum 6458/11 Wells F 3/16/11 4/14/11 1/17/12

Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/14/11

Notice of Motion filed on 1/17/12

26.  Baum - Atty

Change -Frenkel

12/7/11

6459/11 Wells F 3/16/11 3/29/11 No No No

27.  Baum - Atty 6578/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/31/11 8/4/11 8/4/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 09/26/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Change - Filed by P Order Signed 10/5/11 - removed from FCP due to

Page 84: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 84/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 4

g

Fein12/1/11

y g

D's default

28.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Rosicki

12/6/11

6579/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/28/11 10/7/11Filed by P

10/7/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 11/29/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance filed 12/13/11

H.o atty Jonathan Koren 347-920-4930

29.  Baum 6580/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/28/11 11/1/11

Filed by P

12/20/11 Yes Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/9/11 - short sale

30.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Zeicher

12/13/11 

6581/11 GMAC 3/17/11 4/12/11 6/16/11

Filed by P

6/16/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 08/12/11, but h/o didn’t

appear at next FSC on 10/03/11

Stipulation filed 5/19/11

Reply to Counterclaims filed 6/2/11Order signed 10/11/11 - removed from FCP due to

D default

Combined Demands by P filed 11/10/11Response filed 11/10/11

31.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Frenkel

12/20/11

6632/11 Deutsche 3/17/11 3/29/11 6/8/11Filed by P

6/8/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 08/09/11 (but h/odefaulted)

Notice of Appearance filed 6/1/11

Order Signed 8/11/11 - removed from FCP due toD's default

32.  Baum  6738/11 Aurora 3/18/11 3/30/11 1/20/11

Filed by D

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 4/26/11

Notice of Motion to Discontinue filed 1/20/12Order granting motion dated 02/12/23

33.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Knuckles1/18/11

6829/11 Wells F 3/21/11 3/31/11 5/9/11

Filed by P

5/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/21/11, but notes

that “FSC – not eligible”

Notice of Appearance filed 1/3/12Order Signed 1/5/12 - removed from FCP because

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

not owner-occupied

Page 85: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 85/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 5

34.  Baum - Atty

Change -

GPO1/4/12

6830/11 Wells F 3/21/11 4/27/11 6/24/11

Filed by P

6/24/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/12/11, but h/o

defaulted at 2d FSC held on 08/26/11

Notice of Appearance filed 8/15/11Order Signed 8/30/11 - removed from FCP due to

D default

35.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Fein12/7/11

6985/11 Wells F 3/22/11 3/31/11 8/5/11

Filed by P

8/5/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/26/11 and ongoing

Ecourts reflects trial mod on 01/30/12

Answer filed on 4/6/11Notice of Appearance filed on 4/26/11

H/o atty Usman Ahmad 718-482-7777

36.  Baum 6986/11 Midfirst 3/22/11 3/31/11 1/24/12

Filed by P

No Yes LP re-filed on 4/8/11

Amended Complaint filed on 4/8/11

Affs of Service with Complaint filed on 4/15/11 &4/18/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

Notice of Motion to Discontinue filed 1/24/11 (noreason)

H/o atty Richard Babinecz 212-460-3355

37.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Rosicki12/7/11

7130/11 Wells F 3/23/11 3/31/11 No No No Answer filed 4/27/11

Notice of appearance of co-counsel (Hogan

Lovells) filed 5/25/11

38.  Baum 7131/11 Wells F 3/23/11 3/30/11 1/20/12

Filed by P

No Yes Answer filed on 3/31/11

Notice of Motion filed 1/20/1239.  Baum

 Atty Change 

- Frenkel

12/21/11

7133/11 Wells F 3/23/11 4/1/11 10/14/11Filed by P

10/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 12/01/11, but h/odefaulted

Order Signed 12/6/11 - removed from FCP due to

D default

40.  Baum - Atty 7281/11 Wells F 3/24/11 4/4/11 10/14/11 10/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 12/02/11 and ongoing

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Change - Filed by P Answer filed 5/6/11

Page 86: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 86/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 6

Frenkel12/20/11 

H/S atty Volakos Law Firm 718-836-4800

41.  Baum 7300/11 GMAC 3/24/11 4/20/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/8/11 - mtgmodified

42.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Knuckles

11/23/11

7301/11 Aurora 3/24/11 4/4/11 No No No Answer filed 5/6/11

43.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Rosicki

12/7/11

7302/11 Wells F 3/24/11 4/8/11 9/26/11Filed by P

9/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/09/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance filed 4/13/11

Notice of Appearance filed 12/21/11

H/o atty Michael Lee 718-967-5297

44.  Baum 7461/11 Aurora 3/25/11 4/6/11 No No No Answer filed 5/9/11

P's Bill of Particulars & Combined demands filed9/6/11

45.  Baum - AttyChange -

Shapiro

12/12/11

7592/11 RCS 3/28/11 4/8/11 5/12/11Filed by P

5/12/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 08/08/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance filed 8/24/11

H/o atty Carl Maltzman 516-791-7715

46.  Baum 7594/11 US Bank 3/28/11 4/6/11 8/26/11

Filed by P

8/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 10/12/11 and ongoing

Order Signed 1/18/12 - removed from FCP becauseD failed to provide requested documents

47.  Baum 7595/11 Everehome 3/28/11 4/5/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/6/11 - mtg

reinstated48.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Rosicki

12/7/11

7721/11 Wells F 3/29/11 4/12/11 7/14/11Filed by P

7/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 09/21/11 and ongoing

49.  Baum - Atty 7723/11 Wells F 3/29/11 4/12/11 7/21/11 7/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 09/23/11 and ongoing

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Change -

B k

Filed by P Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 02/10/12 and ongoing

Page 87: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 87/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 7

Berkman

50.  Baum - Atty

Change -Frenkel

12/15/11

7724/11 M&T 3/29/11 4/7/11 7/21/11

Filed by P

7/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 09/22/11 and ongoing

Order Signed 9/26/11 - removed from FCP due toD's default

Ecourts reflects back to FSC 11/10/11

51.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Frenkel12/7/11

7833/11 Wells F 3/30/11 4/18/11 8/26/11

Filed by P

8/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 10/11/11, but h/o

defaulted

Order Signed 11/9/11 - removed from FCP due toD's default

52.  Baum 7834/11 Wells F 3/30/11 4/8/11 1/24/11

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts reflects case as “F/C – No Conf”

Notices of Appearance filed 4/21/11 & 4/26/11

Motion to Discontinue (no reason) 01/25/12

Defendant’s atty Vernon & Assoc 718-206-2411

53.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Rosicki12/7/11

7835/11 Wells F 3/30/11 4/7/11 7/11/11Filed by P

7/11/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 09/21/11, but h/o defaultedOrder Signed 9/26/11 - removed from FCP due to

D default

54.  Baum - Atty

Change -Steine

Weiner

11/23/11

7836/11 Aurora 3/30/11 4/7/11 No No No Answer filed 11/4/11

55.  Baum - Atty

Change -Knuckles11/23/11

7837/11 Aurora 3/30/11 4/12/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

Answer filed 5/18/11

56.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Steine

7838/11 Aurora 3/30/11 5/27/11 No No No

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Weiner

11/29/11

Page 88: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 88/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 8

11/29/11

57.  Baum 7839/11 Nationstar 3/30/11 4/7/11 5/27/11

Filed by P

5/27/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 08/09/11, but trial mod

notedEcourts reflects 2nd FSC on 10/18/11, with the note

“settled: mha program”

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/22/11 - D paid off mtg

58. 

Baum - AttyChange -

Fein

12/16/11

7840/11 Bank of NY 3/30/11 4/8/11 No No No

59.  Baum 7966/11 Wells F 3/31/11 4/11/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 6/2/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/13/11 - mtgreinstated

60.  Baum 7970/11 Wells F 3/31/11 4/11/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 7/18/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/9/12 - mtg reinstated61.  Baum -

 Atty Change 

- Shapiro1/20/12

7971/11 PNC 3/31/11 4/11/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/22/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

62.  Baum - Atty

Change -

Roach1/19/12

7972/11 DLJ 3/31/11 4/12/11 6/15/11

Filed by P

6/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 08/10/11, but h/o defaulted

Order Signed 8/16/11 - removed from FCP due to

D's default

63.  Rosicki 5054/11 Chase 3/01/11 03/09/11 No No No Answer filed 03/23/11Notice of Appearance filed 3/24/11

64.  Rosicki 5102/11 Wells F 3/01/11 03/11/11 No No No

65.  Rosicki 5104/11 Flagstar 3/01/11 03/09/11 03/28/11 3/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 05/13/11, a TPP mod by

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Filed by P 07/15/11, and a permanent mod by 11/14/11

Answer filed 03/11/11

Page 89: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 89/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 9

Answer filed 03/11/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/21/11 – mtg

modified

66.  Rosicki 5254/11 Chase 3/02/11 03/10/11 No No No

67.  Rosicki 5255/11 US Bank 3/02/11 03/09/11 No No No Answer filed 04/06/11

68.  Rosicki 5484/11 Chase 3/04/11 03/15/11 No No No

69.  Rosicki 5580/11 Wells F 3/07/11 03/22/11 5/2/11

Filed by P

5/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 06/20/11, but h/o

defaultedOrder Signed 6/23/11 – Removed from FCP due to

D’s default

70.  Rosicki 5584/11 Chase 3/07/11 03/16/11 No No No

71.  Rosicki 5585/11 Deutsche 3/07/11 03/23/11 8/16/11

Filed by P

8/16/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 09/29/11 and 2d FSC

on 12/09/11

Answer filed 03/25/11

Reply to Counterclaims filed 04/20/11

Notice of Appearance filed 12/20/11Order Signed 12/22/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s insufficient income

72.  Rosicki 5725/11 BNY 3/08/11 03/28/11 04/05/11

Filed by P

4/5/11 Yes Ecourts reflects st FSC on 05/24/11, but h/o

defaultedOrder Signed 6/3/11 – Removed from FCP due to

D’s default

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/3/11 – short sale

73.  Rosicki 5726/11 LNV Corp. 3/08/11 04/05/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 04/14/1174.  Rosicki 5727/11 GMAC 3/08/11 5/9/11 No No No

75.  Rosicki 6059/11 Chase 3/11/11 03/29/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 8/2/11

76.  Rosicki 6061/11 DLJ Mtg 3/11/11 03/22/11 8/15/11

Filed by P

8/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 9/29/11 and continuing

Notice of Appearance filed 12/21/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

77.  Rosicki 6062/11 Chase 3/11/11 03/22/11 No No No

78 Rosicki 6110/11 Fannie Mae 3/11/11 03/22/11 5/5/11 No No Ecourts does not reflect this case

Page 90: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 90/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 10

78.  Rosicki 6110/11 Fannie Mae 3/11/11 03/22/11 5/5/11Filed by D

No No Ecourts does not reflect this caseNotice of Motion Filed 5/5/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/24/11 – lossmitigation achieved

Not in ecourts

79.  Rosicki 6111/11 Kondaur 3/11/11 03/22/11 5/9/11

Filed by P

5/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 07/01/11

Order Signed7/25/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s defaultOrder of Reference filed 10/19/11 with DD Aff 

Notice of Entry filed 1/3/12

Notice of Motion filed 1/27/12

80.  Rosicki 6113/11 Chase 3/11/11 03/22/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/2/11 – loss

mitigation achieved

81.  Rosicki 6207/11 Wells F 3/14/11 03/24/11 04/04/11Filed by P

4/4/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 05/13/11Answer filed 04/12/11

Reply to Counterclaims filed 04/20/11Notice of Appearance filed 6/3/11

Order Signed 8/11/11 – removed from FCP due toD’s default

82.  Rosicki 6209/11 Chase 3/14/11 03/24/11 No No No

83.  Rosicki 6210/11 Flagstar 3/14/11 03/24/11 03/30/11Filed by P

3/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 05/13/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/25/11 – mtg

modified

84.  Rosicki 6431/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/28/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/9/1185.  Rosicki 6558/11 Deutsche 3/17/11 03/30/11 5/20/11

Filed by P5/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1

stFSC on 07/05/11

Order Signed 7/25/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s default

86.  Rosicki 6655/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/28/11 No No No Answers filed 04/06/11 and 04/21/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/21/11 – mtg

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

modified

87 Rosicki 6656/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/28/11 04/19/11 4/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 6/10/11

Page 91: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 91/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 11

87.  Rosicki 6656/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/28/11 04/19/11Filed by P

4/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1 FSC on 6/10/11Answer filed 04/14/11

Order Signed 2/1/12 – removed from FCP becauseD failed to provide documents

88.  Rosicki 6659/11 Wall Street 3/18/11 03/29/11 6/2/11

Filed by P

6/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 07/14/11

Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11

Order Signed 7/20/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s defaultNotice of Motion filed 8/11/11

Ecourts reflects marked off calendar 09/20/11

89.  Rosicki 6744/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/31/11 04/15/11

Filed by P

4/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 06/02/11 and ongoing

Notice of Appearance filed 6/17/11

H/o atty Jonathon Koren 347-920-4930

90.  Rosicki 6928/11 Chase 3/22/11 03/30/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11

91.  Rosicki 7200/11 Chase 3/23/11 04/05/11 No No No Reply to Counterclaims filed 5/11/11

92.  Rosicki 7282/11 BNY 3/24/11 04/28/11 No No No93.  Rosicki –

 Atty Change 

Bonchonsky6/29/11

7477/11 Chase 3/25/11 04/05/11 No No No Answer filed 04/07/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/14/11

94.  Rosicki 7479/11 Chase 3/25/11 04/08/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11

95.  Rosicki 7681/11 Chase 3/29/11 04/14/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/16/11 – no reason

96.  Rosicki 7682/11 Live Well 3/29/11 04/08/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/10/11

97.  Rosicki 7775/11 US Bank 3/30/11 04/13/11 5/20/11Filed by P

5/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 07/05/11, noting that aTPP was in place

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/6/11 – mtg modified

98.  McCabe 5064/11 US Bank 3/01/11 03/18/11 11/10/11

Filed by P

11/10/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 01/15/12

Order Signed 1/11/11 – removed from FCP due to

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

D’s default

99. McCabe 5180/11 BNY 3/02/11 03/25/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11

Page 92: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 92/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 12

99.  McCabe 5180/11 BNY 3/02/11 03/25/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11

100 McCabe 5181/11 US Bank 3/02/11 03/18/11 10/13/11

Filed by P

10/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 12/01/11

Order Signed 12/6/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s default

101 McCabe 5188/11 Deutsche 3/02/11 03/15/11 No No No

102 McCabe 5323/11 Deutsche 3/03/11 04/01/11 No No No

103 McCabe 5451/11 US Bank 3/04/11 04/01/11 9/23/11

Filed by P

9/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 11/09/11

Answer filed 04/04/11Order Signed 11/17/11

104 McCabe 5452/11 Deutsche 3/04/11 03/16/11 No No No Answer filed 03/23/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/27/11

105 McCabe 5453/11 Deutsche 3/04/11 03/23/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/16/11 – no reason

106 McCabe 5678/11 OneWest 3/08/11 03/25/11 No No No

107 McCabe 5679/11 Deutsche 3/08/11 04/01/11 11/16/11

Filed by P

11/16/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 1st FSC on 01/11/12

Answer filed 04/13/11

Reply to Counterclaim filed 04/19/11Order Signed 1/18/12 – removed from FCP due toD’s default

108 McCabe 6151/11 Deutsche 3/14/11 03/22/11 2/8/12

Filed by P

2/8/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 03/19/12 and ongoing

Answer filed 03/25/11

H/o atty Beverly Benjaim-Gee through QVLP

109 McCabe 6153/11 Aurora 3/14/11 03/22/11 No No No Answer filed 4/28/11

110 McCabe 6154/11 M. Stanley 3/14/11 04/0411 10/20/11

Filed by P

10/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 12/05/11 and ongoing

111 McCabe 6155/11 HSBC 3/14/11 04/14/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/16/11 – no reason

112 McCabe 6438/11 Aurora 3/16/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/4/11 – no reason

113 McCabe 6562/11 US Bank 3/17/11 04/04/11 No No No

114 McCabe 6563/11 Wells F 3/17/11 04/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/28/11 – no reason

115 McCabe 6814/11 Deutsche 3/21/11 04/06/11 No No No Answer filed 4/27/11

Page 93: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 93/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 13

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/18/11 – no reason

116 McCabe 7093/11 Aurora 3/23/11 04/01/11 2/8/12

Filed by P

2/8/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 03/20/12

117 McCabe 7094/11 Deutsche 3/23/11 04/14/11 8/5/11Filed by D

No Yes Notice of Motion filed 8/5/11Order Signed 9/12/11 – Motion to Dismiss Denied

118 McCabe 7097/11 Deutsche 3/23/11 04/14/11 No No No

119 McCabe 7420/11 HSBC 3/25/11 04/14/11 9/20/11Filed by P

9/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 11/02/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance field 1/25/12

H/o attty Jonathan Koran 347-920-4930

120 McCabe 7421/11 Aurora 3/25/11 04/14/11 No No No

121 McCabe 7571/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 04/14/11 10/20/11

Filed by P

10/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 12/06/11 and ongoing

Answer filed 04/13/11

Notices of Appearances filed 7/29/11 & 12/20/11122 McCabe 7582/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 04/15/11 10/13/11

Filed by P

10/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSCon 12/01/11

Answer filed 12/1/11Notice of Appearance filed 12/13/11

123 McCabe 7701/11 Deutsche 3/29/11 04/18/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/14/11 – no reason

124 McCabe 7702/11 Trucap Trst 3/29/11 04/14/11 1/6/12Filed by P

12/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 02/23/12

125 McCabe 7703/11 Aurora 3/29/11 04/14/11 No No No126 McCabe 7798/11 Aurora 3/30/11 04/14/11 No No No

127 McCabe 7950/11 Wells F 3/31/11 04/18/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

128 McCabe 7951/11 Aurora 3/31/11 5/20/11 2/8/11

Filed by P

2/8/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 03/21/11 (Judge Grays –

pilot project)

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

129 McCabe 7964/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 04/15/11 10/26/11

Filed byP

10/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 12/12/11 and ongoing

Page 94: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 94/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 14

y

130 McCabe 7965/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 04/21/11 12/2/11Filed by P

12/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 01/18/12 and ongoingAnswer filed 4/27/11

Demand for Notice & Inspection 2/27/11

131 Shapiro 5078/11 Chase 3/0111 05/18/11 No No No Answer filed 04/07/11

Verified Answer filed 04/25/11

Reply Filed 5/16/11132 Shapiro 5444/11 Deutsche 3/04/11 03/10/11 No No No Answer filed 5/10/11

Reply filed 5/24/11

133 Shapiro 5682/11 Chase 3/08/11 03/17/11 No No No Answer filed 04/11/11Reply filed 4/26/11

134 Shapiro 5780/11 Deutsche 3/09/11 04/05/11 6/10/11Filed by P

6/10/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 07/26/11Amended Notice of Appearance filed 7/22/11

Order Signed 8/11/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s default135 Shapiro 6149/11 Chase 3/14/11 03/17/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 4/27/11 – no reason

136 Shapiro 6150/11 Chase 3/14/11 03/17/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/24/11

137 Shapiro 6329/11 PHH Mtg 3/15/11 04/11/11 6/14/11

Filed by P

6/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 07/29/11 and ongoing

Amended Complaint filed 04/04/11

Notice of Appereance filed 8/24/11

138 Shapiro 6447/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/21/11 7/8/11

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts does not reflect a FSC

Answer filed 04/06/11Order discontinuing the action, with all papers,

filed 8/12/11 – failed to file RPAPL 1304 90-Daynotice

Notice of Entry filed 12/7/11

H/o atty Charles Spraggins 718-445-9111

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

139 Shapiro 6449/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/22/11 No No No

140 Shapiro 6451/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 03/21/11 12/13/11 No Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 02/01/12 and ongoing

Page 95: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 95/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 15

Filed by D Answer filed 03/23/11

Reply filed 04/13/11Notice of Appearance filed 12/13/11

H/o counsel: MFY (Rubinov)

141 Shapiro 6453/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/31/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/9/11 – no reason

142 Shapiro 6596/11 Wells F 3/17/11 03/22/11 9/8/11

Filed by P

9/8/11 Yes Received Papers 9/14/11

Order Signed 9/14/11 for Judgment of Foreclosure

and to Appoint RefereeAffirmation 9/14/11

143 Shapiro 6820/11 US Bank 3/21/11 03/24/11 11/15/11Filed by P

11/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 01/12/12Answer filed 04/13/11

Order Signed 1/18/12 - removed from FCP due to

D’s default

144 Shapiro 6821/11 Chase 3/21/11 03/30/11 No No No

145 Shapiro 6822/11 Deutsche 3/21/11 04/21/11 9/29/11Filed by P

9/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 11/16/11Order Signed 11/25/11 – Removed from FCP due

to D’s default

146 Shapiro 6933/11 Chase 3/22/11 04/04/11 8/11/11

Filed by P

No Yes Answer filed 04/11/11

Reply filed 5/3/11Notice of Motion filed 8/11/11

Order Signed Discontinuing action filed 9/13/11 –

mtg modified

147 Shapiro 6935/11 Chase 3/22/11 03/30/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 4/26/11 – no reason148 Shapiro 6936/11 Chase 3/22/11 03/31/11 No No No Stipulations filed 04/21/11 & 6/20/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/17/11 – no reason

149 Shapiro 6938/11 PHH Mtg 3/22/11 03/29/11 No No No Answer filed 04/15/11

Notices of Appearance filed 5/9/11 & 5/11/11

150 Shapiro 6939/11 BNY 3/22/11 03/30/11 7/19/11 7/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC 09/01/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Filed by P Order Signed 11/25/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s default151 Sh i 7103/11 BNY 3/23/11 04/27/11 N N N S i /Aff Di i fil d 6/8/11

Page 96: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 96/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 16

151 Shapiro 7103/11 BNY 3/23/11 04/27/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/8/11 – no reason

152 Shapiro 7446/11 Chase 3/25/11 04/13/11 No No No

153 Shapiro 7474/11 US Bank 3/25/11 04/11/11 No No No Answer filed 5/31/11

Notice of Entry Filed 7/12/11

154 Shapiro 7475/11 US Bank 3/25/11 04/08/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/20/11 – no reason

155 Shapiro 7620/11 B of A 3/28/11 04/04/11 04/20/11

Filed by D

No Yes Homeowner filed RJI, Answer and Motion to

Dismiss 04/20/11Notices of Appearance filed 4/25/11 & 5/24/11

Reply filed 5/13/11Affirmation in Opposition, reply. Received Papers

filed 9/9/11

Order signed 9/9/11 for Scheduling ConferenceStipulation of discontinuance filed 11/10/11 –

 jointly filed by both parties; no reason

Order Signed 2/8/12156 Shapiro 7621/11 Chase 3/28/11 04/06/11 No No No

157 Shapiro 7698/11 US Bank 3/29/11 04/01/11 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 04/22/11 – no reason

158 Shapiro 7820/11 Chase 3/30/11 04/11/11 No No No Answer filed 04/14/11

Reply filed 5/4/11

159 Shapiro 7821/11 PHH Mtg 3/30/11 04/11/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/26/12 – no reason

160 Shapiro 7822/11 US Bank 3/30/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/11/11 – no reason

161 Shapiro 7938/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 05/17/11 No No No

162 Shapiro 7940/11 Chase 3/31/11 05/6/11 No No No163 Shapiro 7944/11 Chase 3/31/11 04/05/11 No No No

164 Shapiro 7945/11 Chase 3/31/11 04/29/11 No No No

165 Shapiro 7947/11 Chase 3/31/11 04/07/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/29/11Received Papers 5/3/11

166 Shapiro 7976/11 US Bank 3/31/11 04/13/11 10/24/11 10/24/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/14/11 and ongoing

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Filed by P Answer filed 7/25/11

Reply filed 8/17/11Notice of Appearance filed 9/9/11

Page 97: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 97/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 17

Notice of Appearance filed 9/9/11

167 Fein 5077/11 B of A 3/01/11 03/23/11 No No No Answer filed 03/29/11

168 Fein 5079/11 US Bank 3/01/11 03/22/11 6/2/11

Filed by P

6/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 07/21/11

Order Signed 2/1/12 – removed from FCP due toD’s default

169 Fein 5268/11 Wells F 3/02/11 03/23/11 6/7/11

Filed by P

6/7/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/21/11

Order Signed 7/28/11 – removed from FCP due to

D default

Affidavits & Unsigned Order/Judges memo Filed10/4/11

Order of Reference filed 11/9/11

Notice of Entry Filed 11/22/11

170 Fein 5326/11 Chase 3/03/11 04/20/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/20/11 – no reason

171 Fein 5327/11 Deutsche 3/03/11 03/22/11 7/15/11

Filed by P

7/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/02/11

Order Signed 12/6/11 – removed from FCP becauseunable to be settled

H/o atty – Ali & Bains, P.C. 718-382-2400

172 Fein 5328/11 Chase 3/03/11 03/10/11 No No No Answer filed 04/08/11

173 Fein 5330/11 Chase 3/03/11 03/22/11 No No No Answer filed 04/06/11

174 Fein 5362/11 OneWest 3/03/11 03/10/11 8/30/11Filed by P

8/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 10/20/11Order signed 11/9/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s default

175 Fein 5447/11 Virtual Bnk 3/04/11 03/15/11 No No No176 Fein 5449/11 Chase 3/04/11 04/04/11 No No No

177 Fein 5450/11 Chase 3/04/11 03/21/11 No No No

178 Fein 5552/11 PNC Bank 3/07/11 03/23/11 8/9/11

Filed by P

No Yes Notices of Motion filed 8/9/11 & 10/31/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

179 Fein 5553/11 Deutsche 3/07/11 03/23/11 10/17/11

Filed by P

10/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/29/11 and ongoing

Ecourts reflects TPP 03/13/12Answer filed 04/13/11

Page 98: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 98/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 18

Answer filed 04/13/11

Reply filed 04/14/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/27/11

180 Fein 5684/11 OneWest 3/08/11 03/21/11 7/13/11

Filed by P

7/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 08/29/11 and ongoing

Answer filed 03/28/11Notice of Appearance filed 10/25/11

Order Signed 1/18/12 – removed from FCP because

D does not qualify for a mod

181 Fein 5688/11 Chase 3/08/11 04/04/11 No No No Amended Complaint filed 03/25/11

182 Fein 5799/11 Deutsche 3/09/11 04/05/11 8/4/11

Filed by P

8/4/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/13/11

Amended Complaint filed 03/23/11

Order Signed 9/21/11 – removed from FCP due toD default

183 Fein 5800/11 PNC Bank 3/09/11 04/25/11 6/23/11

Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Motion filed 6/23/11

184 Fein 5912/11 Chase 3/10/11 03/23/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/17/11 – no reason

185 Fein 5914/11 Chase 3/10/11 03/28/11 No No No Reply filed 04/14/11 & 5/24/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

186 Fein 5916/22 Chase 3/10/11 03/21/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/1/12 – loss mit

187 Fein 6026/11 Chase 3/11/11 03/23/11 No No No

188 Fein 6148/11 Chase 3/14/11 03/22/11 6/16/11

Filed by P

6/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 08/02/11

Answer filed 03/21/11Reply filed 03/30/11

Amended Reply filed 04/15/11

189 Fein 6454/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/29/11 No No No Answers (2) filed 04/07/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/6/12 – mtgreinstated

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

190 Fein 6525/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/28/11 No No No

191 Fein 6456/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/24/11 No No No192 Fein 6484/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/31/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11

Page 99: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 99/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 19

192 Fein 6484/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/31/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11

Notice of Claim filed 4/19/11

193 Fein 6485/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/23/11 No No No Answer filed 03/24/11

194 Fein  6589/11 Wilm. Trust 3/17/11 04/04/11 No No No Answer filed 04/07/11

195 Fein –

 Atty Change 

– Heath

Girinsky

4/8/11

6592/11 Chase 3/17/11 03/31/11 No No No Answer filed 04/04/11

196 Fein  6595/11 PNC Bank 3/17/11 03/30/11 8/9/11Filed by P

No Yes Answer filed 04/22/11Notice of Motion filed 8/9/11

Order signed 10/21/11

Stipulations filed 10/21/11

Notice of Entry filed 10/31/11

Verified Complaint filed 12/12/11H/o atty – Pankaj Malik 718-446-5755

197 Fein 6707/11 B of A 3/18/11 03/31/11 No No No Answer filed 6/21/11

Rejection of Answer filed 6/29/11

Affidavit of Service filed 7/26/11

198 Fein 6709/11 OneWest 3/18/11 03/29/11 No No No Rejection of Answer 5/19/11Verified Answer 6/24/11

Reply 7/5/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/11/11 - no reasonbut signed by both parties

199 Fein 6711/11 Chase 3/18/11 04/04/11 No No No

200 Fein 6823/11 JPMC 3/21/11 04/07/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/4/12 – no reason

201 Fein 6825/11 Chase 3/21/11 03/29/11 No No No Rejection of Answer filed 11/9/11

Answer and cross claim filed 11/14/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

202 Fein 6826/11 Chase 3/21/11 04/12/11 9/2/11

Filed by D

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

Answer filed 5/4/11Rejection of Answer filed 5/10/11

Page 100: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 100/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 20

Rejection of Answer filed 5/10/11

Stipulation filed 6/23/11

Notice of Appearance filed 8/12/11Notice of Motion to Dismiss filed 9/2/11

203 Fein 6941/11 Chase 3/22/11 03/31/11 No No No

204 Fein  6945/11 Chase 3/22/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/19/11 – Fact

previously unknown to Plaintiff now known

205 Fein 6947/11 Flag Star 3/22/11 04/01/11 5/25/11Filed by P

5/25/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/12/11Reply (to what?) filed 04/25/11

Order Signed 1/18/12 – removed from FCP – D did

not qualify for a mod

H/o atty – The Wool Law Group

206 Fein 6948/11 Wells F 3/22/11 04/07/11 No No No

207 Fein 6971/11 Wells F 3/22/11 03/31/11 8/4/11Filed by P 8/4/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1

st

FSC held 09/14/11Order Signed 9/21/11 – removed from FCP as loan

is a construction loan

208 Fein 7167/11 Wells F 3/23/11 04/04/11 5/25/11

Filed by P

5/25/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/12/11

Answer filed 04/11/11

RJI filed on 5/25/11Order Signed 2/1/12 – Removed from FCP – D

failed to qualify for a mod

209 Fein 7253/11 Chase 3/24/11 03/31/11 No No No210 Fein 7252/11 Deutsche 3/24/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/20/11 – mtg

reinstated

211 Fein 7254/11 PNC Bank 3/24/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/8/12 – loss

mitigation

212 Fein 7255/11 OneWest 3/24/11 03/31/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/12/11 – loss

mitigation213 Fein 7445/11 Chase 3/25/11 04/05/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/12/11 – improper

Page 101: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 101/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 21

p p p

service of RPAPL 1304 90-Day Notice

214 Fein 7448/11 OneWest 3/25/11 04/05/11 8/1/11Filed by D

No Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/13/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

Answer filed 6/17/11

Rejection of Answer filed 6/23/11

Notice of Motion to Ext. Time to Ans. filed 8/1/11Notice of Appearance filed 10/6/11

Notice of Motion filed 10/31/11

Order Granting Motion Signed 10/31/11

215 Fein 7568/11 OneWest 3/28/11 04/11/11 6/29/11

Filed by P

6/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 08/16/11 and ongoing

Reply filed 5/10/11Answer filed 7/14/11

216 Fein 7697/11 Aurora 3/29/11 04/07/11 10/17/11

Filed by P

10/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/29/11 and ongoing

Answer filed 04/18/11Reply filed 04/20/11

217 Fein 7823/11 OneWest 3/30/11 04/11/11 10/11/11

Filed by P

10/11/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/30/11 and ongoing

218 Fein 7824/11 OneWest 3/30/11 04/18/11 8/12/11Filed by P

8/12/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/28/11Order signed 1/18/12 – removed from FCP – D was

denied a mod

219 Fein 7825/11 OneWest 3/30/11 04/05/11 8/19/11Filed by P

8/19/11 Yes Not in ecourtsOrder signed 10/6/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s default

220 Fein 7935/11 Nationstar 3/31/11 04/11/11 No No No

221 Fein 7937/11 Chase 3/31/11 04/07/11 No No No Answer filed 04/18/11

Reply filed 04/20/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

222 Fein 8006/11 HSBC 3/31/11 04/19/11 No No No

223 Dorf 5251/11 Wells F 3/02/11 03/16/11 No No No Answer filed 04/01/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/2/11 - no reason

Page 102: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 102/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 22

p

224 Dorf 5252/11 HSBC 3/02/11 03/24/11 No No No

225 Dorf 5253/11 HSBC 3/02/11 03/16/11 No No No Answer filed 03/30/11

Reply filed 04/18/11

226 Dorf 5369/11 Wells F 3/03/11 04/08/11 11/3/11

Filed by P

11/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/23/11

Order Signed 1/5/11 – removed from FCP due to D

default

227 Dorf 5371/11 HSBC 3/03/11 03/21/11 No No No Answer filed 03/24/11

228 Dorf 5454/11 Wells F 3/04/11 03/24/11 No No No

229 Dorf 6328/11 Deutsche 3/15/11 04/04/11 No No No

230 Dorf 6479/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 04/11/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11

231 Dorf 6482/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 03/30/11 No No No Answer filed 04/08/11

232 Dorf 6483/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 06/15/11 No No No Answer filed 04/05/11

Reply filed 4/26/11

233 Dorf 6740/11 BNY 3/18/11 03/30/11 7/14/11Filed by P

7/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/01/11Ecourts reflects h/o found not eligible 02/10/12Ecourts reflects P filed Mtn to Appt Ref 02/29/12

234 Dorf 7451/11 HSBC 3/25/11 04/07/11 No No No

235 Dorf 7600/11 HSBC 3/28/11 04/14/11 9/16/11Filed by P

9/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 10/28/11Ecourts reflects loan mod on 03/02/12

Answer filed 04/15/11

Discovery requests filed (why?) 04/15/11

Reply to counterclaims filed 5/9/11H/o atty – Sol Mermelstein 718-436-8098

236 Dorf 7602/11 BNY 3/28/11 04/06/11 11/9/11

Filed by P

11/9/11 Yes

237 Dorf 7603/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 04/18/11 No No No

238 Dorf 7801/11 HSBC 3/30/11 04/13/11 No No No

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

239 Frenkel 5321/11 Deutsche 3/03/11 04/06/11 7/15/11

Filed by P

7/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 08/29/11, but h/o

defaultedOrder Signed 9/8/11 – removed from FCP due to D

Page 103: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 103/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 23

default

240 Frenkel 5365/11 Deutsche 3/03/11 03/16/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11

241 Frenkel 6024/11 Deutsche 3/11/11 5/9/11 No No No Answers filed 3/18/11 & 3/31/11

242 Frenkel 6152/11 Deutsche 3/14/11 03/31/11 2/3/12Filed by P

2/3/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 03/14/12, but h/odefaulted

243 Frenkel 6565/11 Deutsche 3/17/11 03/29/11 10/7/11

Filed by P

10/7/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/23/11 and ongoing

Notice of Appearance filed 12/13/11

H/o atty – Luz A. Lizarazo 914-385-0292

244 Frenkel 6608/11 OneWest 3/17/11 04/06/11 No No No Answer filed 4/29/11

Reply filed 5/4/11

245 Frenkel 6916/11 B of A 3/22/11 04/13/11 No No No

246 Frenkel 6917/11 BAC 3/22/11 03/30/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/20/11 - no reason

247 Frenkel 6964/11 OneWest 3/22/11 03/30/11 10/7/11Filed by P

11/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/23/11, but h/odefaulted

Order signed 11/29/11 – removed from FCP due toD default

248 Druckman 5325/11 Wells F 3/03/11 03/18/11 No No No

249 Druckman 5680/11 Wells F 3/08/11 04/01/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11

250 Druckman 7696/11 Wells F 3/29/11 4/29/11 No No No

251 Steine –

 Atty Change – Knuckles1/10/12

5074/11 Flagstar 3/01/11 03/24/11 6/30/11

Filed by D

No Yes Notice of Motion filed 6/30/11

Ecourts reflects Mtn to Ext. Time to Ans. 07/06/11Stipulation & Motion withdrawn 8/9/11Answer filed 8/12/11

Stipulation So Ordered filed 10/3/11

H/o atty – Alice A. Nicholson 800-323-3024

252 Steine 5704/11 Chase 3/08/11 04/04/11 No No No

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

253 Steine

 Atty Change – Knuckles

5817/11 Flagstar 3/09/11 04/04/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11

Page 104: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 104/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 24

12/28/11

254 Steine 6476/11 Flagstar 3/16/11 05/09/11 8/2/11

Filed by P

11/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/13/11 and ongoing

Answer filed 04/12/11

Notice of Appearance filed 5/11/11H/o atty – Kenneth Lituack 718-428-4806

255 Steine 7732/11 Freedom 3/29/11 04/11/11 11/15/11

Filed by P

11/22/11 Yes Ecourts reflects motion filed 07/12/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11Notice of Motion filed 11/22/11

Affirmation in Opposition filed 1/25/11Memo Decision filed 1/25/11

Order of Reference filed 1/26/11

256 Weinreb 5250/11 US Bank 3/02/11 03/21/11 7/7/11

Filed by P

6/30/11 Yes Order of Reference filed 8/1/11

Notice of Entry filed 8/26/11

Judgment of Foreclosure filed 11/4/11Notice of Entry 11/29/11

257 Weinreb –

 Atty Change 

– Katz

8/1/11

5818/11 BNY 3/09/11 04/07/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11

258 Weinreb 5820/11 Deutsche 3/09/11 03/21/11 8/8/11

Filed by P

8/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 09/20/11

Notice of Appearance filed 4/16/11

Answer filed 5/13/11Order Signed 11/16/11 – removed from FCP

because unable to settle

259 Weinreb 6613/11 US Bank 3/17/11 04/05/11 6/21/11

Filed by P

6/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects Mtn to Appt Ref filed 06/21/11

Memo Decision and received papers filed 7/13/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

260 Weinreb 6742/11 Wells F 3/18/11 04/04/11 No No No

261 Weinreb 7802/11 Deutsche 3/30/11 04/14/11 9/9/11Filed by P

9/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/04/11Notices of Appearance filed 4/15/11 & 4/25/11

O d Si d 11/16/11 d f FCP d

Page 105: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 105/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 25

Order Signed 11/16/11 – removed from FCP due toD default

262 Weinreb –

 Atty Change 

– Hinshaw

5/10/11

7803/11 Deutsche 3/30/11 04/14/11 No No No Answer filed 5/4/11

Reply filed 6/7/11

Stipulation & Affirmation filed 7/28/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue as against one defendant

filed 7/28/11 - discontinued with prejudice signedby P and D

263 Stein 6716/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/23/11 10/3/11

Filed by P

10/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/04/12

Answer filed 03/24/11

Notice of Appearance filed 11/14/11Demand filed 11/14/11

Order Signed 1/11/12 – removed from FCP due to

D default264 Stein 7115/11 OneWest 3/23/11 04/05/11 10/3/11

Filed by P

10/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 11/23/11 and indicates

a TPPEcourts reflects a loan mod as of 02/01/12

Answer filed 04/07/11

Notice of Appearance filed 12/13/11

265 Stein 7819/11 OneWest 3/30/11 04/05/11 No No No

266 Stein 7952/11 FFreedom 3/31/11 04/27/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

267 Berkman 5284/11 Green Tree 3/03/11 03/23/11 6/9/11Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts reflects Mtn for Order of Ref filed 06/14/11Papers Received 6/27/11

Order Signed 6/27/11

268 Berkman 7053/11 Suntrust 3/23/11 04/18/11 No No No Answer filed 04/19/11

Reply filed 5/12/11

269 Berkman 7285/11 Cent Mtg 3/24/11 04/06/11 No No No

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

270 Katz 5189/11 US Bank 3/02/11 03/16/11 10/20/11

Filed by P

10/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC on 12/07/11, and also

indicates a loan modH/o atty – Valarie Hawkins 516-292-0984

271 K t 6475/11 D t h 3/16/11 03/29/11 12/29/11 12/29/11 Y

Page 106: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 106/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 26

271 Katz 6475/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 03/29/11 12/29/11Filed by P

12/29/11 Yes

272 Katz 7607/11 Wells F 3/28/11 04/04/11 10/25/11Filed by P

10/25/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 12/15/11Notices of Appearance filed 5/13/11 & 12/22/11

273 Katz 7992/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 04/12/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 6/2/11

274 Stagg 7742/11 Mid-Island 3/29/11 12/09/11 04/01/11

Filed by P

4/1/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 05/09/11

Answer filed 04/19/11

Reply Filed 5/29/11Notice of Motion to Discontinue filed 6/1/11 &

7/20/11

Order Signed 10/26/11Notice of Entry filed 11/10/11

Amended Verified Complaint filed 11/10/11Notice of Appearance Filed 1/26/11

275 Stagg 7743/11 Mid-Island 3/29/11 04/01/11 No No No

276 De Rose 6012/11 PDL Bank 3/11/11 03/23/11 No No No

277 De Rose 6013/11 US Bank 3/11/11 03/25/11 5/26/11Filed by P

5/26/11 Yes Papers Received & Order Signed 6/14/11Ecourts reflects that P’s Mtn to Appoint a Referee

was denied on 06/22/11 and the case was sent to the

FCP, but it does not appear that FSCs have been

held in the intervening 9 months278 De Rose 6370/11 Deutsche 3/15/11 03/25/11 04/20/11

Filed by D5/4/11 Yes Homeowner filed RJI in conjunction with an OSC

seeking an injunction. A plaintiffs’ class action

firm represents h/o.

Judge’s Memo on OSC filed 5/11/11Judge’s Memo on Second OSC 10/3/11 – enjoined

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

P from proceeding as conference required, but no

FSCs held yetH/o atty – Squitters & Fearon, LLP 212-421-6492

279 De Rose 6371/11 Deutsche 3/15/11 03/25/11 No No No Aff/Stip of Discontinuance filed 04/18/11 myg

Page 107: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 107/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 27

279 De Rose 6371/11 Deutsche 3/15/11 03/25/11 No No No Aff/Stip. of Discontinuance filed 04/18/11 - mygreinstated

280 De Rose –

 Atty Change 

– Blank 

Rome

11/22/11

6373/11 HSBC 3/15/11 04/12/11 No No No Answer filed 6/9/11

Reply filed 9/7/11

Notices of Appearance filed 9/7/11, 10/27/11 &

11/22/11

Notice of Address Change filed 9/26/11Notice of Motion filed 10/4/11

Preliminary Conference Ordered 10/27/11Answer filed 12/13/11

Reply filed 12/30/11

281 Sheldon 7598/11 Wells F 3/28/11 04/21/11 5/9/11

Filed by P

5/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/01/11, but h/o

defaulted

Order Signed 7/25/11 – removed from FCP due toD’s default

282 Sheldon 7599/11 Wells F 3/28/11 04/13/11 4/28/11Filed by P

4/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects first FSC held on 6/13/11Answer filed 5/26/11

Order signed 6/17/11 – removed from FCP due to

D’s default

283 Cohn 5788/11 BNY 3/09/11 04/18/11 6/1/11

Filed by P

6/27/11 Yes Ecourts reflects that P filed Mtn to Appoint a

Referee on 06/17/11 and that a traverse hearing was

ordered 03/06/12Answer filed 6/10/11

Papers Received 6/27/11Order Signed 6/27/11

Affirmation filed 6/27/11

Notice of Motion filed 10/21/11

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

284 Cohn 7581/11 TD Bank 3/28/11 04/21/11 04/21/11

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 06/14/11

Notice of Appearance filed 5/17/11Judge’s Memo & Papers Received 7/8/11

Ecourts reflects loan mod on 07/19/11

Page 108: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 108/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 28

Ecourts reflects loan mod on 07/19/11

Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/30/11 - mtg paid off 

285 Sweeney 7730/11 CitiCorp 3/29/11 04/01/11 No No No Answer filed 4/27/11

286 Rosenblum 7655/11 Flatbush SL 3/29/11 04/07/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11

287 Weltman –

 Attny

Change –

Elliot S.Schissel

6/13/11

7068/11 UNFCU 3/24/11 05/20/11 5/20/11

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/27/11, but that on

08/17/11, case deemed “not eligible”

Answer filed 4/28/11

Reply 5/16/11Order Signed 8/30/11

Memo Decision filed 11/7/11

Notice of Entry filed 11/15/11Order Signed 1/23/12

Notice of Entry filed 1/26/11

Receiver appointed 02/10/12H/o atty – Elliot S. Schlissel 516-516-6645

288 Hiscock 6640/11 Bayview 3/17/11 04/18/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/3/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/23/11 - mtg paid

off 

289 Knuckles 5810/11 Wilmington 3/09/11 03/17/11 9/19/11

Filed by P

9/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/31/11 and ongoing

Answer filed 03/18/11

Notice of Appearance 12/21/11

Order Signed 1/18/11 – removed from FCP becausecase not settled

290 Donato 5543/11 BNB Bank 3/07/11 03/28/11 6/15/11

Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Motion filed 6/15/11

Memo Decision 9/7/11

OSC filed 11/15/11

OSC withdrawn 1/30/12

Queens County – March 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourts

Record

Other

291 Solomon 5413/11 BB&T Mtg 3/04/11 03/23/11 No No No

292 Herzfeld – Atty Change 

Vernick

5374/11 Bayview 3/03/11 03/24/11 5/2/11Filed by P

No Yes Order Signed 11/16/11 - ???Order of Reference & received papers filed

12/20/11

Page 109: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 109/134

Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 29

– Vernick 5/11/11

12/20/11

293 Roach 5053/11 HSBC 3/01/11 03/10/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/1/11 – no reason

294 Davidson 5082/11 Deutsche 3/01/11 03/07/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/17/11 – no reason

Page 110: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 110/134

APPENDIX F

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

1.  Baum

 Atty Change GPO

12/27/11

22313/11 Wells Fargo 10/3/11 10/24/11 11/30/11

Filed by P

11/30/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/13/12

Page 111: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 111/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 1

2.  Baum

 Atty Change

Frenkel12/20/11

22317/11 Deutsche 10/3/11 10/19/11 12/1/11

Filed by P

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 11/1/11

Ecourts: First FCP 2/10/12

3.  Baum

Atty ChangeSweeny

1/19/12

22443/11 Citimtg 10/4/11 11/1/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 11/1/11 &

11/9/11

4.  Baum

 Atty Change

McCabe

12/15/11

23718/11 M&T 10/20/11 11/14/11 No No No Filed as Pillar

Answer filed 11/9/11Reply filed 11/29/11

5.  Baum –

 Atty Change 

Fein1/20/12

23719/11 Aurora 10/20/11 11/14/11 No No No Filed as Pillar

Answer filed 11/22/11

6.  Baum –

 Atty Change

Frenkel

12/5/11

24535/11 Wells F 10/28/11 11/30/11 No No No

7.  Baum – Atty Change

Rosicki

12/5/11

24600/11 Wells F 10/31/11 11/21/11 No No No Answer filed on 11/17/11

8.  Fein 22508/11 PNC 10/5/11 10/14/11 1/31/12

Filed by P

1/31/11 Yes Answer filed on 1/13/12

Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/10/12

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

9.  Fein 23547/11 GMAC 10/18/11 11/18/11 1/13/12

Filed by P

1/13/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/3/12

10.  Fein 24038/11 LNV 10/24/11 11/18/11 1/17/12

Filed by P

No Yes S&C Filed by Fein Such but RJI filed by

 Rosicki; ecourts lists Rosicki as counsel but 

Page 112: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 112/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 2

y

no change of attny filed 

Answer filed 1/18/12

Notice of Substitution of counsel filed by DAurora on 1/19/12

11.  Fein 24298/11 GMAC 10/26/11 11/18/11 12/20/11Filed by P

12/20/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/28/12

12.  Fein 24397/11 Wells F 10/27/11 11/4/11 No No No

13.  Rosicki 22422 US Bank 10/4/11 10/20/11 1/25/11

Filed by P

No Yes Motion coverpage filed by P on 1/25/12

Ecourts doesn’t list an FCP conference

Ecourts: Motion fully submitted 3/2/12

14.  Rosicki 22876/11 Citimtg 10/7/11 10/24/11 No No No Answer filed 11/7/11

Reply filed 11/9/1115.  Rosicki 22854/11 Chase 10/7/11 10/24/11 No No No Answer filed 10/26/11

Reply filed 11/10/11

16.  Rosicki 23144/11 Aurora 10/12/11 10/25/11 12/27/11

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/28/12

17.  Rosicki 23145/11 Nationstar 10/12/11 11/21/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed on 11/15/11 &

11/28/11

18.  Rosicki 23241/11 Chase 10/13/11 10/26/11 No No No Answer filed 10/26/11

19.  Rosicki 23540/11 Chase 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No20.  Rosicki 23952/11 Chase 10/21/11 11/16/11 No No No

21.  Rosicki 23951/11 Chase 10/21/11 12/5/11 No No No

22.  Rosicki 23950/11 MetLife 10/21/11 11/16/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/18/11

23.  Rosicki 23949/11 BofA 10/21/11 11/3/11 No No No

24.  Rosicki 23903/11 Chase 10/21/11 11/16/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/12/11

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

25.  Rosicki 23906/11 Freedom 10/21/11 11/18/11 No No Yes Answer filed 12/1/11

Ecourts: First FCP 6/12/1226.  Rosicki 23905/11 US Bank 10/21/11 11/17/11 No No No Answer filed on 11/14/11

Notice of Appearance filed on 11/18/11

Page 113: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 113/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 3

27.  Rosicki 23953/11 US Bank 10/21/11 11/23/11 1/26/12

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts: First FCP 3/28/12

28.  Rosicki 24244/11 Citimtg 10/25/11 11/15/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/5/11

29.  Rosicki 24243/11 Chase 10/25/11 11/16/11 No No No

30.  Rosicki 24339/11 Chase 10/26/11 11/4/11 No No No

31.  Rosicki 24442/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/4/11 12/16/11

Filed by P

12/16/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP 3/28/12

32.  Rosicki 24443/11 Chase 10/27/11 11/15/11 No No No Answer filed 11/28/11

33.  Rosicki 24553/11 Chase 10/28/11 11/14/11 No No No Supplemental S&C filed 11/3/11

Notice of Pendency Amended 11/3/11

Notice of Appearance filed 11/22/11

Answer filed 12/14/11

Reply filed 1/19/12Aff of Service filed 1/19/12

34.  Rosicki 24552/11 Freedom 10/28/11 12/16/11 No No No

35.  Rosicki 24605/11 Deutsche 10/31/11 12/5/11 No No No Answer filed 11/14/11

Reply filed 11/29/11

36.  Rosicki 24606/11 Chase 10/31/11 11/14/11 No No No Answer filed 11/16/11

37.  Shapiro 22334/11 US National 10/3/11 10/12/11 11/17/11Filed by P

11/17/11 No Ecourts: First FCP conference 2/15/12

38.  Shapiro 21631/11 Wells F 10/4/11 10/17/11 No No No39.  Shapiro 22713/11 US Bank 10/6/11 10/25/11 11/23/11

Filed by P11/23/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 1/10/12

40.  Shapiro 22696/11 Chase 10/6/11 12/14/11 No No No

41.  Shapiro 22685/11 Wells F 10/6/11 10/24/11 11/29/11

Filed by P

11/29/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/10/12

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

42.  Shapiro 22866/11 Chase 10/7/11 11/4/11 No No No

43.  Shapiro 23344/11 Chase 10/14/11 10/20/11 No No No Answer filed 11/23/11Reply filed 12/9/11

44.  Shapiro 23353/11 Deutsche 10/14/11 11/1/11 No No No Reply filed 11/29/11 (answer was not filed)

Page 114: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 114/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 4

45.  Shapiro 23440/11 US Bank 10/17/11 12/20/11 1/6/12

Filed by P

1/6/12 Yes Notice of pendency filed 1/12/12

Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/27/12

46.  Shapiro 23798/11 Chase 10/20/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed 11/10/11

Reply filed 12/9/11

47.  Shapiro 23919/11 HSBC 10/21/11 1/4/12 1/12/12

Filed by P

1/12/12 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 11/17/11

Notice of Pendency filed 2/14/11Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/17/12

48.  Shapiro 23936/11 HSBC 10/21/11 10/31/11 12/29/11Filed by P

12/29/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/20/11

49.  Shapiro 24092/11 Chase 10/24/11 11/1/11 No No No

50.  Shapiro 24413/11 Chase 10/27/11 2/6/12 No No No Answer filed 11/10/11

Reply filed 11/29/11

51. 

Shapiro 24537/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/25/11 1/12/12Filed by P 1/12/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/27/12

52.  Shapiro 24536/11 Chase 10/28/11 12/2/11 1/6/12Filed by D

No Yes Motion coverpage to disiss filed by D on1/10/12

53.  Leopold 22491/11 HSBC 10/5/11 11/1/11 No No No

54.  Leopold 22490/11 Deutsche 10/5/11 10/27/11 12/27/11

Filed by D

No Yes Motion coverpage for summary judgment

filed by D on 12/27/11

55.  Leopold 22489/11 Wells Fargo 10/5/11 10/17/11 No No No

56.  Leopold 22488/11 Wells Fargo 10/5/11 12/6/11 No No No Answer filed 11/14/11Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11

57.  Leopold 23352/11 Deutsche 10/14/11 10/14/11 No No No

58.  Leopold 23875/11 Wells Fargo 10/21/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed 11/14/11

Amended Answer filed 12/7/11

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

59.  McCabe 22299/11 Wells F 10/3/11 11/14/11 No No No Reply filed 11/15/11 (answer not filed)

Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/1160.  McCabe 22431/11 BofA 10/4/11 10/29/11 No No No Third Party Authorization filed 10/24/11

61.  McCabe 22546/11 Bank of NY 10/5/11 10/29/11 No No No

62 M C b 22545/11 B k f NY 10/5/11 10/29/11 N N N

Page 115: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 115/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 5

62.  McCabe 22545/11 Bank of NY 10/5/11 10/29/11 No No No

63.  McCabe 22302/11 BofA 10/3/11 12/13/11 No No No Answer filed 10/18/11 & 11/3/11

64.  McCabe 22300/11 Bank of NY 10/3/11 11/23/11 No No No

65.  McCabe 22724/11 Deutsche 10/6/11 10/29/11 No No No

66.  McCabe 22725/11 US Bank 10/6/11 10/29/11 11/30/11

Filed by D

No Yes Motion coverpage for dismissal filed by D on

12/1/11

67.  McCabe 22868/11 US Bank 10/7/11 10/29/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 10/31/11

68.  McCabe 22867/11 US Bank 10/7/11 11/18/11 No No No

69.  McCabe 22982/11 GMAC 10/11/11 12/2/11 No No No

70.  McCabe 22979/11 Citibank 3/14/11 3/30/11 No No No

71.  McCabe 22981/11 Aurora 10/11/11 12/16/11 2/7/12Filed by P

2/7/12 Yes Answer filed 11/14/11Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/22/12

72.  McCabe 23125/11 Bank of NY 10/12/11 10/27/11 2/14/12Filed by P

2/14/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/15/12

73.  McCabe 23124/11 Bank of NY 10/12/11 10/27/11 No No No

74.  McCabe 23449/11 Bank of NY 10/17/11 11/4/11 No No No Answer filed 10/31/11

Notice of Appearance filed 11/18/11

75.  McCabe 23538/11 US Bank 10/18/11 11/14/11 No No No Stip/Affirm to Discontinue filed on 1/6/12 –

no reason

76.  McCabe 23659/11 Deutsche 10/19/11 11/4/11 No No No

77.  McCabe 23788/11 Deutsche 10/20/11 11/15/11 No No No Notice of Appearance & Answer filed11/28/11Demand for Documents filed 11/28/11

Reply filed 12/9/11

78.  McCabe 24074/11 Bank of NY 10/24/11 11/9/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/22

Answer filed 11/29/11

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

79.  McCabe 24073/11 Deutsche 10/24/11 11/17/11 2/9/12

Filed by P

2/9/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/2/12

80.  McCabe 24077/11 BofA 10/24/11 No No No No

81.  McCabe 24079/11 Wells Fargo 10/24/11 11/17/11 No No No Answer filed on 11/17/11

82 M C b 24191/11 HSBC 10/25/11 11/21/11 2/9/11 2/9/11 Y E t Fi t FCP f 5/2/12

Page 116: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 116/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 6

82.  McCabe 24191/11 HSBC 10/25/11 11/21/11 2/9/11

Filed by P

2/9/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/2/12

83.  McCabe 24326/11 BofA 10/26/11 11/21/11 3/12/12

Filed by P

3/12/12 Yes Answer filed 11/23/11

Amended answer filed 12/13/11

Notice of Appearance filed 12/16/11

Reply filed 12/16/11Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/2/11

84.  McCabe 24541/11 Bank of NY 10/28/11 11/15/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/29/11

Reply filed 12/2/11 (no answer filed)

85.  McCabe 24615/11 Bank of NY 10/31/11 12/13/11 No No No Answer filed on 12/12/11

86.  Frenkel 22824/11 BofA 10/7/11 1/20/12 2/16/12

Filed by P

2/16/16 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/15/12

87. 

Frenkel 22985/11 ReverseMtg Soltns 10/11/11 11/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11Answer filed 1/13/12

88.  Frenkel 22983/11 One West 10/11/11 10/19/11 No No No Answer filed 10/25/11

89.  Frenkel 22984/11 One West 10/11/11 10/20/11 No No No Answer filed 1/13/12

90.  Frenkel 22961/11 Capital One 10/11/11 10/20/11 No No No Reply filed 11/29/11 (no answer filed)Consent to Change D’s atty filed on 12/14/11

Verified reply filed on 12/22/11

91.  Frenkel 23236/11 Wells Fargo 10/13/11 10/24/11 No No No

92.  Frenkel 23239/11 Wells Fargo 10/13/11 11/2/11 No No No Notice of Appearance 11/7/1193.  Frenkel 23240/11 One West 10/13/11 10/27/11 No No No

94.  Frenkel 23297/11 Deutsche 10/14/11 11/19/11 1/12/11

Filed by P

1/12/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/3/12

95.  Frenkel 23414/11 Bank of NY 10/17/11 10/27/11 No No No

96.  Frenkel 23450/11 Reverse 10/17/11 12/30/11 No No No

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Mtg Soltn

97.  Frenkel 23451/11 ReverseMtg Soltn

10/17/11 10/28/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 11/17/11 &11/28/11

98.  Frenkel 23502/11 BofA 10/18/11 10/28/11 12/22/11

Filed by P

12/22/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/20/11

Page 117: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 117/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 7

Filed by P

99.  Frenkel 23501/11 Bank of NY 10/18/11 11/3/11 3/9/12

Filed by P

3/9/12 Yes Answer filed 1/11/12

Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/17/12

100. Frenkel 23503/11 Bank of NY 10/18/11 10/27/11 2/7/12

Filed by P

2/7/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/22/12

101. Frenkel 23505/11 Bank of NY 10/18/11 10/31/11 3/9/12Filed by P

3/9/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/25/11

102. Frenkel 23655/11 Midfirst 10/19/11 10/28/11 1/5/12Filed by P

1/5/12 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 11/17/11Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/28/11

103. Frenkel 24193/11 One West 10/25/11 11/9/11 2/29/12Filed by P

2/29/12 Yes Answer filed 11/14/11Ecourts: Return Date of Motion 3/22/12

104. Frenkel 24194/11 Wells Fargo 10/25/11 11/3/11 No No No Reply filed 12/5/11 (answer not filed)

105. Frenkel 24323/11 One West 10/26/11 11/15/11 No No No Stip to Discontinue filed 12/22/11 – no reason106. Frenkel 24324/11 Midfirst 10/26/11 11/21/11 1/19/12

Filed by P

1/19/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/16/12

107. Frenkel 24406/11 BofA 10/27/11 11/9/11 2/7/12

Filed by P

2/7/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/22/11

108. Frenkel 24405/11 Bank of NY 10/27/11 11/22/11 2/7/12

Filed by P

2/7/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/22/12

109. Frenkel 24622/11 BofA 10/31/11 11/21/11 2/2/12

Filed by P

2/2/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/11/12

110. Sweeny 22322/11 Citibank 10/3/11 10/26/11 12/7/11Filed byD

No Yes Motion filed by D to dismiss on 12/7/11

111. Sweeny 22356/11 Citimtg 10/4/11 10/12/11 No No No Answer filed 11/18/11

112. Sweeny 22357/11 Citimtg 10/4/11 11/10/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 10/31/11,

11/7/11, 11.9/11 & 11/18/11

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Answer filed 11/4/11

113. Sweeny 22519/11 Citimtg 10/5/11 10/14/11 No No No114. Sweeny 22879/11 Citimtg 10/7/11 2/6/12 No No No

115. Sweeny 23647/11 Citimtg 10/19/11 11/3/11 No No No Answer filed 11/22/11

116 Sweeny 23769/11 Citimtg 10/20/11 11/9/11 No No No

Page 118: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 118/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 8

116. Sweeny 23769/11 Citimtg 10/20/11 11/9/11 No No No

117. Sweeny 23770/11 Citimtg 10/20/11 10/26/11 No No No

118. Stiene 22947/11 Chase 10/11/11 12/20/11 No No No

119. Stiene 23997/11 Chase 10/24/11 11/9/11 No No No Answers filed 11/28/11 & 12/13/11

120. Stein 22520/11 Everbank 10/5/11 10/19/11 1/26/12Filed by P

1/26/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/10/12

121. Stein 23126/11 One West 10/12/11 12/13/11 No No No Notice of pendency re-filed on 11/16/11

122. Stein 23460/11 One West 10/17/11 10/26/11 No No No

123. Stein 23574/11 US Bank 10/18/11 1/9/12 1/26/12

Filed by P

1/26/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/4/12

124. Stein 24632/11 One West 10/31/11 12/2/11 1/11/12

Filed bu P

1/11/212 Yes Motion for order of reference filed by P on

1/11/12

Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/27/12125. Derose 22544/11 BofA 10/5/11 10/26/11 No No No

126. Derose 23340/11 Wells Fargo 10/14/11 10/28/11 No No No Stip to Discontinue filed 12/22/11 – no reason

127. Berkman 23601/11 Wells Fargo 10/19/11 11/4/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/18/11

128. Druckman 22509/11 Bank ofNY 10/5/11 No No No No

129. Druckman 22700/11 Bank of NY 10/6/11 11/10/11 No No No Notice of pendency re-filed 1/4/12

Notice of Appearance filed 1/17/12

130. Druckman 22826/11 BofA 10/7/11 11/10/11 No No No

131. Druckman 22831/11 Bank of NY 10/7/11 11/10/11 No No No

132. Druckman 22865/11 Bank of NY 10/7/11 11/1/11 No No No

133. Druckman 22858/11 HSBC 10/7/11 11/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 11/17/11

134. Druckman 22859/11 Bank of NY 10/7/11 10/31/11 No No No

135. Druckman 22959/11 US Bank 10/11/11 11/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/14/11

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

136. Druckman 23097/11 BofA 10/12/11 12/2/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/1/11

137. Druckman 23092/11 Bank of NY 10/12/11 10/25/11 1/13/12Filed by D

No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11Answer filed 11/15/11

Reply filed 12/6/11Motion filed by D on 1/13/12

Page 119: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 119/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 9

Motion filed by D on 1/13/12

Ecourts: Motion return date 2/8/12

138. Druckman 23642/11 Bank of NY 10/19/11 11/10/11 No No No Notice of Appearance 11/18/11

139. Druckman 24310/11 Bank of NY 10/26/11 11/22/11 No No No Answer filed 12/2/11

140. Druckman 24309/11 Bank of NY 10/26/11 11/7/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/7/11

141. Druckman 24427/11 Bank of NY 10/27/11 11/22/11 3/9/12Filed by P

2/17/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/1/12

142. Druckman 24428/11 HSBC 10/27/11 11/22/11 No No No

143. Druckman 24539/11 BofA 10/28/11 11/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/12/11

144. Katz 22316/11 Deutsche 10/3/11 10/19/11 No No No

145. Katz 22318/11 Deutsche 10/3/11 10/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11

146. Katz 22433/11 HSBC 10/4/11 10/17/11 3/8/12

Filed by P

No Yes Motion coverpage filed 3/9/12

Ecourts: Motion return date 5/14/12147. Katz 22796/11 Deutsche 10/7/11 No No No No

148. Katz 23235/11 HSBC 10/13/11 11/25/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 11/4/11 &

11/10/11Reply filed 11/9/11 (no answer filed)

149. Katz 23447/11 Wells Fargo 10/17/11 11/3/11 12/28/11Filed by P

12/2811 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/13/12

150. Katz 24325/11 ING Bank 10/26/11 11/9/11 No No No

151. Katz 24420/11 US Bank 10/27/11 12/22/11 No No No152. Roach 22990/11 Deutsche 10/11/11 10/29/11 No No No Answer filed 12/17/11

153. Roach 24034/11 US Bank 10/24/11 11/17/11 No No No

154. Roach 24035/11 HSBC 10/24/11 11/29/11 No No No

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

155. Roach 24036/11 Wells Fargo 10/24/11 11/9/11 No No No Answer filed 11/15/11

156. Roach 24473/11 Bank of NY 10/28/11 11/30/11 No No No157. Schlesinger 22344/11 Flushing 10/3/11 1/9/12 3/2/12

Filed by P

No Yes Order to Show Cause Coverpage filed 4/17/12

Notice of Appearance filed 4/10/12

Motion coverpage filed by P on 3/2/12

Page 120: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 120/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 10

Motion coverpage filed by P on 3/2/12

Notice of Appearance filed 11/17/11Ecourts: Motion Return Date 3/23/12

158. Schiller 23786/11 MT bank 10/20/11 11/14/11 3/19/12

Filed by P

3/19/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/16/12

159. Schiller 24071/11 M&T 10/24/11 1/30/12 No No No Notice of Appearance Filed 11/28/11

160. Knuckles 23604/11 Citibank 10/19/11 11/9/11 No No No Answer filed 11/23/11Reply filed 12/19/11

161. Knuckles 24147/11 Citibank 10/25/11 12/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/28/11

Notice of pendency re-filed 12/8/11

162. May 23351/11 Wells Fargo 10/14/11 11/2/11 No No No

163. May 23752/11 Wells Fargo 10/20/11 11/21/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/28/11

164. Zucker 22710/11 Mtg & RealEstate &

Income

Fund

10/6/11 1/27/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/23/11Answer filed 12/9/11

165. Guy 22986/11 Nationstar 10/11/11 10/24/11 No No No Answer filed 10/18/11

166. Robinowtiz 23167/11 Tuthill

Finance

10/13/11 11/4/11 1/12/12

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/16/12

167. Masone 23169/11 Maspeth

Fed Savings

10/13/11 1/11/12 2/14/11

Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/8/12

168. Hiscock 23251/11 Bayview 10/13/11 12/27/12 No No No Notice of pendency re-filed 11/23/11

169. Scarinci 23382/11 Capital Plus 10/17/11 2/7/12 No No No Answers filed 12/5/11 & 12/23/11

Notice of Appearance filed 1/5/12

170. Kosterich 23787/11 Waterfall 10/20/11 11/15/11 12/19/11 No Yes Motion filed by P on 12/19/11

Kings County –October 2011

Firm Index # Bank Date

Filed

Aff of 

Service

RJI DD Aff Ecourt

Record

Other

Victoria

Fund

Filed by P Ecourts: Motion return date 3/28/12

171. Davidson 23817/11 Bank of NY 10/20/11 1/11/12 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11

172. Bonchonsky 23888/11 US Bank 10/21/11 12/15/11 No No No Answer filed 11/16/11

Reply filed 11/30/11

Page 121: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 121/134

Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 11

Reply filed 11/30/11

173. Butler 24006/11 Chase 10/24/11 No No No No Stip to Discontinue filed 11/22/11 –

homeowner re-executed mortgage documents

174. Cohen 24540/11 US Bank 10/28/11 11/18/11 11/18/11

Filed by P

11/18/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/21/12

175. Simon 24571/11 Bank of NY 10/31/11 12/7/11 1/30/12

Filed by P

No Yes Motion filed by P on 2/1/12

Ecourts: Return Date for Motion 2/27/12

Page 122: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 122/134

APPENDIX G

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

1.  Baum

 Atty Change

- Rosiki01/20/12

23492/11 Everbank 10/13/11 10/28/11 No No No Answer and NOA filed 11/09/11 byMansour (?)

2.  Baum

 Atty Change 

23736/11 GMAC 10/17/11 11/07/11 No No No

Page 123: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 123/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 1

– Berkman

12/14/11

3.  Baum

 Atty Change 

– Fein Such01/30/12

23737/11 Metlife 10/17/11 No No No No

4.  Baum

 Atty Change 

– Knuckler

01/24/12

23855/11 Deutsche 10/18/11 11/02/11 No No No

5.  Baum

 Atty Change – Fein Such

01/26/12

24069/11 Aurora 10/20/11 11/07/11 No No No

6.  Baum

 Atty Change – McCabe12/07/11

24252/11 Wells F 10/24/11 11/09/11 No No No NOA and “Demand” filed by h/o’s atty

01/17/12

7.  Baum

 Atty Change – Fein Such

12/21/11

24253 Wells F 10/14/11 11/07/11 No No No

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

8.  Baum 24254/11 US Bank 10/24/11 11/09/11 11/29/11Filed by P

11/29/11 Yes Answer filed 01/10/12 by h/o attyNOA filed 01/25/12 by h/o atty

Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 01/18/119.  Baum

 Atty Change 

– Rosicki

24388/11 Deutsche 10/25/11 11/07/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/22/11

Page 124: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 124/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 2

12/20/11

10.  Baum 24677/11 FannieMae

10/28/11 11/14/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty on 12/01/11Other Ds file NOAs 11/28/11 and 11/29/11

USA file NOA 12/12/11

P filed Reply to Counterclaims 12/08/1111.  Sweeney 22754/11 CitiMtg 10/03/11 10/11/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 10/13/11

12.  Sweeney 22755/11 Citibank 10/03/11 10/11/11 12/12/11

Filed by D

No No OSC for leave to intervene filed 12/12/11

13.  Sweeney 22852/11 CitiMtg 10/04/11 10/11/11 No No No Answer and NOA filed by h/o atty on

12/07/11Notice of discontinuance filed 12/23/11 –

no reason provided; signed by h/o’s atty14.  Sweeney 22853/11 Citibank 10/04/11 10/21/11 No No No Notice of discontinuance filed 01/06/12 –

no reason provided; only signed by

Sweeney

15.  Sweeney

 Atty Change – Katz &

Rychik 

01/04/12

23124/11 CitiMtg 10/07/11 10/19/11 No No No Answer w/ counterclaims and NOA filed

11/25/11Answer filed 12/09/112

16.  Sweeney 23222/11 CitiMtg 10/11/11 10/19/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/14/11

17.  Sweeney 23374/11 CitiMtg 10/12/11 10/19/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 12/15/11

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

18.  Sweeney 23933/11 CitiMtg 10/19/11 10/28/11 No No No

19.  Sweeney 24039/11 CitiMtg 10/20/11 12/16/11 No No No

20.  Sweeney 24040/11 CitiMtg 10/20/11 12/08/11 No No No21.  Sweeney 24041/11 CitiMtg 10/20/11 10/27/11 No No No NOA filed by USA 12/02/11

22.  Sweeney 24154/11 CitiMtg 10/21/11 10/28/11 No No No

23.  Sweeney 24155/11 CitiMtg 10/21/11 10/27/11 No No No

Page 125: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 125/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 3

24.  Sweeney 24158/11 CitiCorp

Trust FSB

10/21/11 10/28/11 No No No

25.  Sweeney 24159/11 CitiMtg 10/21/11 10/27/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/09/11

26.  Sweeney 24298/11 CitiMtg 10/24/11 11/02/11 No No No

27.  Sweeney 24580/11 CitiMtg 10/27/11 11/21/11 No No No

28.  Sweeney 24653/11 CitiMtg 10/28/11 11/16/11 No No No

29.  Frenkel 22765/11 US Bank 10/03/11 10/13/11 11/18/12Filed by P

No Yes Ecourts reflects that 1st

FSC held 01/13/12

30.  Frenkel 23107/11 Deutsche 10/07/11 10/17/11 No No No

31.  Frenkel 23228/11 Wells F 10/11/11 10/31/11 01/06/12

Filed by P

01/11/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/22/12

32.  Frenkel 23230/11 OneWest 10/11/11 10/19/11 No No No Discontinuance stip filed 01/20/12 – noreason for discontinuance cited

33.  Frenkel 23231/11 OneWest 10/11/11 10/19/11 01/20/12Filed by P

01/20/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/04/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC to be held 03/02/12

34.  Frenkel 23305/11 BAC HLS 10/11/11 11/07/11 No No No NOA filed by Maspeth Fed Sav 11/07/11

35.  Frenkel 23476/11 HSBC 10/13/11 10/27/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/10/11

36.  Frenkel 23477/11 OneWest 10/13/11 10/24/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/01/11

NOA filed by USA 11/16/11

37.  Frenkel 23478/11 OneWest 10/13/11 10/27/11 No No No Discontinuance stip filed 12/23/11 – noreason for discontinuance cited

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

38.  Frenkel 23856/11 OneWest 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No Discontinuance stip filed 12/23/11 – noreason for discontinuance cited

39.  Frenkel 24067/11 HSBC 10/20/11 10/27/11 01/06/12Filed by P

01/11/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o atty 11/18/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/22/12

40.  Frenkel 24283/11 BOA 10/24/11 11/01/11 No No No

41.  Frenkel 24283/11 BOA 10/24/11 11/01/11 No No No

Page 126: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 126/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 4

42.  Frenkel 24477/11 Deutsche 10/26/11 11/29/11 No No No

43.  Frenkel 24745/11 AmHome 10/31/11 11/17/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 12/23/11

44.  Shapiro 22843/11 Chase 10/04/11 10/17/11 No No No

45.  Shapiro 23011/11 Chase 10/06/11 10/19/11 No No No

46.  Shapiro 23076/11 US Bank 10/07/11 10/13/11 No No No

47.  Shapiro 23238/11 Chase 10/11/11 10/17/11 No No No

48.  Shapiro 23240/11 Chase 10/11/11 11/10/11 No No No

49.  Shapiro 23241/11 US Bank 10/11/11 10/17/11 12/23/11Filed by P

11/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/15/12

50.  Shapiro 23381/11 Chase 10/12/11 10/19/11 No No No

51.  Shapiro 23383/11 PHH Mtg 10/12/11 10/19/11 No No No

52.  Shapiro 23386/11 PHH Mtg 10/12/11 10/21/11 11/18/11Filed by P

11/18/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 01/12/12

53.  Shapiro 23930/11 US Bank 10/19/11 10/25/11 12/19/11Filed by P

12/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/08/12

54.  Shapiro 24030/11 Chase 10/20/11 10/27/11 No No No Discontinuance Notice filed 01/18/12 – noreason for discontinuance cited

55.  Shapiro 24033/11 HSBC 10/20/11 12/02/11 12/21/11Filed by P

12/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/01/12(Judge Grays – OCA Pilot Project)

56.  Shapiro 24037/11 US Bank 10/20/11 10/27/11 12/15/11Filed by P

12/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/08/12(found not eligible for FSC)

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

57.  Shapiro 24059/ss Deutsche 10/20/11 11/01/11 12/20/11Filed by P

12/20/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se on 11/22/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/09/12

58.  Shapiro 24285/11 US Bank 10/24/11 11/01/11 12/19/11Filed by P

12/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/08/12

59.  Shapiro 24468/11 US Bank 10/26/11 11/01/11 No No No

60.  Shapiro 24814/11 Deutsche 10/31/11 12/05/11 12/14/11

Fil d b P

12/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/01/12

(J d G OCA Pil t P j t)

Page 127: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 127/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 5

Filed by P (Judge Grays – OCA Pilot Project)

61.  Rosicki 23141/11 Chase 10/07/11 10/20/11 No No No

62.  Rosicki 23143/11 Flagstar 10/07/11 10/20/11 02/02/12

Filed by P

02/12/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC to be held 03/12/12

63.  Rosicki 23145/11 CitiMtg 10/07/11 11/01/11 No No No

64.  Rosicki 23143/11 GMAC 10/12/11 10/24/11 No No No

65.  Rosicki 23144/11 US Bank 10/12/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/10/11

66.  Rosicki 23416/11 Chase 10/12/11 10/27/11 No No No Answer filed by NYC HPD 11/22/11

67.  Rosicki 23637/11 Wells F 10/14/11 10/27/11 No No No

68.  Rosicki 23638/11 GMAC 10/14/11 11/07/11 11/23/11

Filed by P

11/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 01/24/12

69.  Rosicki 23892/11 Chase 10/19/11 11/07/11 No No No NOA filed by D RBS Citizen70.  Rosicki 24182/11 Chase 10/21/11 11/21/11 No No No

71.  Rosicki 24374/11 Chase 10/25/11 11/21/11 No No No

72.  Rosicki 24407/11 Chase 10/25/11 11/03/11 No No No H/o filed request for production of docs to P

– filed pro se with assistance of LAS

73.  Rosicki 24408/11 Chase 10/25/11 11/04/11 No No No

74.  Rosicki 24409/11 CitiMtg 10/25/11 11/10/11 No No No

75.  Rosicki 24503/11 Chase 10/26/11 01/24/11 No No No

76.  Rosicki 24504 Flagstar 1026/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer, NOA and doc demands filed by h/oatty 11/22/11

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

Reply to counterclaim filed by P 12/09/11

77.  Rosicki 24591/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/21/11 12/29/11

Filed by P

12/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/14/12

78.  Rosicki 24592/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/04/11 No No No

79.  Rosicki 24593/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/09/11 12/07/11

Filed by P

12/07/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/25/12

80 McCabe 22743/11 BOA 10/03/11 10/28/11 No No No Answer filed by ?? 10/28/11

Page 128: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 128/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 6

80.  McCabe 22743/11 BOA 10/03/11 10/28/11 No No No Answer filed by ?? 10/28/11

81.  McCabe 22931/11 HSBC 10/05/11 11/21/11 02/06/12 ?? Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC to be held 03/16/12

82.  McCabe 23004/11 BNY 10/06/11 11/21/11 No No No

83.  McCabe 23110/11 Aurora 10/07/11 10/27/11 12/13/11

Filed by D

No No Answer filed by h/o atty on 01/31/11

Motion filed by h/o atty 12/13/11

84.  McCabe 23223/11 Wells F 10/11/11 11/10/11 No No No

85.  McCabe 23224/11 BOA 10/11/11 11/21/11 No No No

86.  McCabe 23232/11 GMAC 10/11/11 10/27/11 No No No NOAs filed 10/31/11 and 11/07/11

87.  McCabe 23232/11 GMAC 10/11/11 12/19/11 No No No

88.  McCabe 23233/11 Aurora 10/11/11 11/15/11 No No No Answer filed 11/18/11

Reply filed 11/29/11

89.  McCabe 23367/11 Deutsche 10/12/11 10/31/11 No No No90.  McCabe 23471/11 HSBC 10/13/11 11/10/11 No No No

91.  McCabe 23512/11 Aurora 10/13/11 11/10/11 No No No NOA filed by NYC HPD 12/01/11

92.  McCabe 23598/11 US Bank 10/14/11 10/31/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o 12/14/11

NOA and Reply filed by P co-counselHogan Lovells 01/05/12

93.  McCabe 23686/11 Wells F 10/17/11 10/26/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o 11/16/11Reply filed by P 11/22/11

94.  McCabe 23687/11 OneWest 10/17/11 01/06/12 No No No95.  McCabe 24136/11 Wells F 10/21/11 11/10/11 No No No

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

96.  McCabe 24138/11 Wells F 10/21/11 11/09/11 No No No

97.  McCabe 24772/11 Consumer

Solutions

10/24/11 12/13/11 No No No

98.  McCabe 24375/11 Wells F 10/25/11 11/28/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 01/12/12

Demand for FSC filed by h/o 01/17/12

99.  McCabe 24575/11 GMAC 10/27/11 11/15/11 No No No NOAs filed by USA on 12/22/11 and by

Municipal Credit on 11/28/11

Page 129: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 129/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 7

Municipal Credit on 11/28/11

100.  McCabe 24662/11 Chase 10/28/11 11/21/11 No No No

101.  McCabe 24663/11 Aurora 10/28/11 11/21/11 02/08/12

Filed by ?

?? Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC to be held 03/20/12

102.  McCabe 24815/11 BNY 10/31/11 11/10/11 No No No103.  Fein 22761/11 US Bank 10/03/11 11/09/11 No No No NOA filed by NYC on 12/01/11

104.  Fein 23518/11 Wells F 10/13/11 No 10/13/11

Filed by P

No Yes P filed OSC for declaratory judgment

11/22/11; denied 11/23/1. Ecourts identifies

this case as “other real property” – probablyworth looking at actual papers filed

105.  Fein 23929/11 GMAC 10/19/11 11/02/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/04/11

106. 

Fein 23966/11 MERS 10/19/11 No 10/19/11Filed by P No Yes P filed RJI and OSC on 10/19/11; OSCdenied 01/25/11. Ecourts identifies this

case as “other real property” – probably

worth looking at actual papers filed

107.  Fein 24666/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/07/11 12/23/11

Filed by P

12/23/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se 01/19/12

P rejected answer 01/26/12Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/15/12

108.  Fein 24667/11 Chase 10/28/11 11/23/11 No No No

109.  Fein 24673/11 Chase 10/28/11 11/21/11 No No No110.  Fein 24795/11 Chase 10/31/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 12/13/11

111.  Fein 24796/11 Chase 10/31/11 11/07/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 01/23/12

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

112.  Fein 24797/11 Chase 10/31/11 11/17/11 No No No Discontinuance filed 01/04/12 for the statedreason that the loan had been reinstated.

113.  Fein 24798/11 GMAC 10/31/11 11/17/11 No No No114.  Fein 24799/11 Nationstar 10/31/11 11/17/11 12/09/11

Filed by P

12/09/11 Yes NOA filed by non-h/o defendant 12/20/11

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/03/12

115.  Fein 24805/11 Branch 10/31/11 11/16/11 No No No

116 Katz 22744/11 Deutsche 10/03/11 10/14/11 No No No

Page 130: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 130/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 8

116.  Katz 22744/11 Deutsche 10/03/11 10/14/11 No No No

117.  Katz 22835/11 HSBC 10/04/11 10/14/11 No No No

118.  Katz 22924/11 HSBC 10/05/11 10/24/11 No No No

119.  Katz 22925/11 Wells F 10/05/11 10/14/11 12/28/11

Filed by P

12/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held 02/15/12

120.  Katz

 Atty Change 

– Hinshaw

Culbertson12/23/11

23121/11 Deutsche 10/07/11 10/21/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o 11/07/11Reply filed by P 11/14/11

121.  Katz 23375/11 US Bank 10/12/11 11/09/11 No No No Answer and “Demand” filed by h/o11/28/11; NOA filed by US Atty 12/22/11

122.  Katz 23227/11 Wells F 10/11/11 10/27/11 01/04/12Filed by P

01/04/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o 11/14/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/17/12

123.  Katz 23789/11 HSBC 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o’s widower 11/07/11

124.  Katz 23790/11 Wells F 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No

125.  Katz 23845/11 HSBC 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No NOA and Answer filed by h/o atty 11/23/11

126.  Katz 24140/11 BNY 10/21/11 10/31/11 No No No

127.  Katz 24281/11 PNC Bank 10/24/11 11/09/11 No No No

128.  Katz 24300/11 HSBC 10/24/11 11/09/11 No No No129.  Katz 24576/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/07/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 11/29/11

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

Reply filed by P 11/23/11

130.  Druckman 22759/11 US Bank 10/03/11 10/31/11 No No No

131.  Druckman 22841/11 Capital 1 10/04/11 10/31/11 No No No Guardian report of sale of apt 01/23/12132.  Druckman 23075/11 BNY 10/07/11 11/04/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o 11/09/11

NOA filed by US Atty 11/28/11

133.  Druckman 23563/11 Wells F 10/14/11 11/14/11 No No No

134 Druckman 24134/11 Deutsche 10/21/11 11/14/11 No No No

Page 131: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 131/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 9

134.  Druckman 24134/11 Deutsche 10/21/11 11/14/11 No No No

135.  Druckman 24286/11 Wells F 10/24/11 11/21/11 No No No NOA filed by ?? 12/19/11

136.  Druckman 24466/11 Wells F 10/26/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/21/11

137.  Druckman 24809/11 Deutsche 10/31/11 12/29/11 No No No

138.  Leopold 22868/11 Deutsche 10/04/11 10/20/11 No No No Answer filed h/o atty 11/21/11

Reply to counterclaims filed by P 12/07/11

139.  Leopold 22935/11 Deutsche 10/05/11 10/19/11 No No No

140.  Leopold 24161/11 Deutsche 10/21/11 No No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/22/11

141.  Leopold 24163/11 Wells F 10/21/11 11/10/11 No No No

142.  Leopold 24396/11 HSBC 10/25/11 No No No No

143.  Leopold 24483/11 HSBC 10/26/11 11/07/11 No No No

144.  Leopold 24484/11 Wells F 10/26/11 11/10/11 No No No145.  Leopold 24688/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/16/11 No No No

146.  Leopold 24689/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/16/11 No No No

147.  Stein 23220/11 GMAC 10/11/11 12/23/12 01/23/11

Filed by P

01/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC to be held 03/15/12

148.  Stein 23221/11 OneWest 10/11/11 12/19/11 No No No NOA with waiver filed 10/31/11

149.  Stein 23600/11 OneWest 10/14/11 12/28/11 No No No

150.  Stein 23601/11 OneWest 10/14/11 10/24/11 11/17/11Filed by P

11/17/11 No Answer filed by h/o 12/30/11NOA filed by LSE for h/o 01/18/12

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held on 01/11/12

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

(Judge Grays – Queens Pilot Project)

151.  Stein 23860/11 US Bank 10/18/11 11/01/11 01/23/12 01/23/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held on 03/15/12

152.  Stein 23861/11 US Bank 10/18/11 10/28/11 01/27/12Filed by P

01/27/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o atty 11/17/11Reply filed by P on 12/02/11

Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held on 03/15/12

153.  Stein 23862/11 US Bank 10/18/11 10/25/11 02/01/12Filed by P

02/01/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o atty 11/16/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held on 03/20/12

Page 132: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 132/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 10

y

154.  Stein 23863/11 OneWest 10/18/11 11/01/11 11/17/11Filed by P

11/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held on 01/09/12

155.  Stein 24794/11 OneWest 10/31/11 12/02/11 No No No

156.  May 22936/11 Wells F 10/05/11 10/27/11 01/05/12

Filed by P

01/05/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held on 02/23/12

157.  May 23151/11 BNY 10/07/11 10/19/11 01/17/12

Filed by P

01/17/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held on 03/01/12

158.  May 23914/11 BNY 10/19/11 11/04/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 11/14/11

159.  May 23915/11 Waterfall 10/19/11 10/28/11 11/23/11Filed by P

11/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st

FSC held on 02/23/12

160.  May 24058/11 US Bank 10/20/11 11/07/11 No No No

161.  May 24584/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/14/11 No No No Answer and Demand for Documents filed

by h/o atty 11/22/11Reply to Counterclaims filed by P 11/30/11

162.  De Rose 22836/11 HSBC 10/04/11 10/17/11 12/02/11Filed by P

12/02/11 Yes Ecourts reflects loan was reinstated at 1st FSC held on 01/19/12

163.  De Rose 23597/11 GlobalBank 

10/14/11 10/27/11 No No No Discontinuance Stip filed 11/22/11 citingpayment of arrears

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

164.  De Rose 24825/11 Deutsche 10/31/11 11/09/11 01/04/11Filed by P

01/04/11 Yes Ecourts reflects loan was modified and casesettled at 1st FSC held on 02/08/12

(Judge Grays – Queens Pilot Project)165.  De Rose 24826/11 Bayview 10/31/11 11/14/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/15/11

166.  Roach 24658/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/21/11 No No No NOA filed by USA 12/19/11

167.  Roach 24560/11 HSBC 10/27/11 11/22/11 No No No NOA filed by NYC HPD 12/14/11

168.  Roach 24050/11 Wells F 10/20/11 12/05/11 No No No “Affidavit of Compliance” filed 11/15/11

Page 133: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 133/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 11

p

Answer filed by h/o atty 12/22/11

169.  Roach 24558/11 Wells F 10/27/11 11/16/11 No No No “Affidavit of Compliance” filed 11/15/11

170.  Roach 24559/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/22/11 No No No

171.  Berkman 22718/11 GreenTree 10/03/11 10/13/11 No No No Answer filed 10/17/11

172.  Berkman 23842/11 Nationstar 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No NOA filed by MERS 11/28/11Answer filed by h/o pro se 01/27/12

173.  Berkman 24284/11 Cent. Mtg. 10/24/11 11/01/11 No No No NOA filed by USA 12/19/11

174.  Berkman 24479/11 Sovereign 10/26/11 10/28/11 No No No

175.  Stagg 22840/11 Emigrant 10/04/11 10/12/11 10/11/11

Filed by P

10/11/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se 10/26/11

Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 11/28/11

176.  Stagg 24038/11 Waterfall 10/20/11 11/09/11 No No No177.  Stagg 24577/11 Oceanfirst 10/27/11 11/03/11 11/04/11

Filed by P

11/04/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/16/11

Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 12/22/11

178.  Hiscock 23421/11 Bayview 10/12/11 10/26/11 No No No NOA filed by a defendant bank 10/31/11

179.  Hiscock 23424/11 Bayview 10/12/11 10/26/11 No No No

180.  Schiller 22837/11 M&T 10/04/11 11/14/11 No No No

181.  Schiller 22930/11 M&T 10/05/11 10/13/11 12/30/11

Filed by P

12/30/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o 10/14/11

Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 02/28/12(Judge Grays – Queens Pilot Project)

Queens County – October 2011

Firm Index # Bank DateFiled

Aff of Service

RJI Due DlgAff 

EcourtsRecord

Other

182.  Stiene 23249/11 Chase 10/11/11 11/14/11 No No No NOA filed by IRS 12/19/11

183.  Stiene 23489/11 Chase 10/13/11 12/07/11 No No No

184.  Borchert 24218/11 Chase 10/24/11 02/03/12 No No No185.  Delbello 23179/11 Chase 10/11/11 11/09/11 No No No

186.  Deutsch

 Atty Change 

– Borchert

23787/11 Emigrant 10/18/11 11/17/11 12/30/11Filed by P

12/30/11 Yes Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 02/22/12 butthat h/o not eligible for FSC

Page 134: Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 134/134

Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 12

Borchert

12/06/11

187.  Ginsburg 23870/11 Residential

Dev Group

10/18/11 No No No No Discontinuance Stip filed 01/04/12

ACRIS indicates this is a 1-3 familyw/office or store

188.  Knuckles 24651/11 Wells F 10/28/11 12/15/11 No No No NOA filed by unknown party 12/16/11

189.  Norris 23774/11 Nat’l Loan 10/18/11 1107/11 No No No Unidentified “Affirmation” filed 10/18/11

190.  Platzer 23935/11 TD Bank 10/19/11 11/29/11 No No No

191.  Salamon 22822/11 Flagstar 10/04/11 10/17/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 10/26/11

192.  Stagg 23020/11 Emigrant 10/06/11 10/13/11 10/11/11Filed by P

10/11/11 No Ecourts indicates 1st

FSC held 11/28/11

193.  Weinreb 23152/11 Deutsche 10/07/11 10/20/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/01/11NOA filed by Zava Realty 11/07/11