justice unsettled- how the foreclosure docket & discontinuances prevent new yorkers from saving...
TRANSCRIPT
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 1/134
JUSTICE
UNSETTLEDHow the Foreclosure
Shadow Docket &
Discontinuances PreventNew Yorkers from
Saving Their Homes
MFY LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 2/134
299 Broadway, New York, NY 10009 (212) 417-3700 www.mfy.org
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 3/134
Summary of Findings and Recommendations
On August 2, 2011, MFY Legal Services, Inc. ("MFY") published Justice Deceived: How Large Foreclosure Firms Subvert State Regulations Protecting Homeowners (“ Justice
Deceived ”)1, an examination of New York State foreclosure law firms’ abuse of the legal processin foreclosure cases.
Justice Deceived identified a “shadow docket” of thousands of foreclosure cases that laydormant in the court system—recently estimated by the court to be at least 25,000 cases—to thedetriment of struggling New York homeowners. This shadow docket emerged after the New
York State Unified Court System (UCS) issued a rule in October 2010 requiring that allforeclosure law firms attest to the accuracy of the legal papers they filed in court, in response tothe widely reported robo-signing scandal in the mortgage industry. Since the implementation of the rule, after a foreclosure action is filed, the foreclosure firm must file an affirmation (the “DueDiligence Affirmation”) simultaneously with its filing of the Request for Judicial Intervention(RJI). Justice Deceived demonstrated that foreclosure law firms almost immediately stoppedfiling RJIs after issuance of the court rule. This change in practice was likely to avoid filing theDue Diligence Affirmation and having to attest to the accuracy of the foreclosure complaint.
These cases, in which complaints are filed but no RJI is filed—which would otherwise promptthe case to move forward—often linger indefinitely on the shadow docket.
Foreclosure law firms’ wholesale refusal to file the RJIs is not only a clear violation of state law, but also significantly injures homeowners who want to save their homes. Without anRJI, New York courts do not schedule court-supervised foreclosure settlement conferences.Homeowners stranded in the shadow docket—largely unrepresented by counsel—are left toattempt to negotiate mortgage loan modifications on their own. Not surprisingly, many of thesehomeowners fail. Failure is due in part to the perverse financial incentives in the industry thatenable mortgage loan servicers to make more money in fees by foreclosing than they do if a loanis modified and the home saved. Failure is also due to the delinquent interest, inspection fees,attorney’s fees and other costs heaped on top of mortgage loan balances while foreclosure casesare trapped in the shadow docket. The larger a loan balance, the more difficult it is to attain anappropriate and affordable modification.
When Justice Deceived was published in August 2011, 87% of all residential foreclosureactions filed in Brooklyn and Queens in November 2010 and March 2011 sat in this shadowdocket, blocking homeowners’ access to the settlement conference and much-neededconnections to HUD-approved housing counseling and free legal services.
Since the publication of Justice Deceived , aspects of foreclosure landscape have changed.I F b 2012 S J B P C h l f N Y k' f l l fi h
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 4/134
But has this changed landscape provided for a reduced shadow docket?
Unfortunately, no.
Between February and March 2012, MFY re-reviewed the November 2010 and March2011 residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens. While there has been a reduction inthe shadow docket, many homeowners are still being denied access to the settlement conference part. A re-review of the November 2010 and March 2011 residential foreclosure filings inBrooklyn and Queens reveals that 43% of cases remain in the shadow docket .
Additionally, MFY’s recent review uncovered a disturbing new development: anexcessive number of discontinuances are being filed by foreclosure law firms without providingany grounds for the discontinuance. While some discontinuances are filed when a modificationor some other settlement is reached, in the majority of cases, the discontinuance is filed prior toany settlement conference, again depriving the homeowner access to the court-supervised process. Instead, the homeowner must languish further, waiting for the foreclosure law firm tore-file the foreclosure action. This practice – filing foreclosure complaints, allowing them to
languish for a year or more, and then discontinuing them – further undermines the New York State Legislature’s intention in creating the foreclosure settlement conference in the first place:to facilitate loan modification negotiations early in the process, under the court’s guidance, inorder to avoid unnecessary foreclosures and further economic hardship.
In our experience, when a foreclosure action is filed but later discontinued withoutsettlement, a homeowner has more difficulty negotiating a loan modification than he would hadhe not been sued in the first instance. This circumstance results because the foreclosing servicer most often intends to re-file the foreclosure once it gets its paperwork in order, so internally theservicer does not transfer the file back to its department that handles foreclosures that are not inlitigation. When a homeowner whose foreclosure has been discontinued contacts his servicer todiscuss a loan modification, the servicer’s computer system shows that the file has beentransferred to outside counsel for litigation. When the homeowner then contacts the servicer’sattorney, he is told there is no active litigation and thus there exists no case to settle via a loanmodification. The cycle of dysfunction evident at so many stages of the residential mortgage-
backed securitization process persists throughout the lifecycle of a mortgage loan, even when theservicer has voluntarily dismissed a foreclosure lawsuit. As with a case that gets stuck in theshadow docket, when a servicer dismisses a foreclosure action without settlement, a homeowner is injured by the process because as he is unable to negotiate a loan modification and the loanarrears keep building; thus when the case is re-filed, an affordable modification becomes moredifficult.
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 5/134
Because the foreclosure law firms’ behavior has not improved since the publication of Justice Deceived , and because too many homeowners are mired in the shadow docket, MFY
encourages OCA to quickly adopt the following policies and practices so as to limit the damageto homeowners:
Schedule the current shadow docket backlog of foreclosure cases for settlementconferences as soon as possible, with or without the filing of an RJI.
Require that the Due Diligence Affirmation be filed at the same time as the summons andcomplaint. MFY’s recent re-review of court records underscores the primacy of this
recommendation. In addition to the fact that the shadow docket remains intolerably large,the high rate of discontinuances filed without any loan modification or other settlementindicates that the vast majority of foreclosure summons and complaints are defective. Toguarantee that the purpose of the Due Diligence Affirmation—to protect homeownersand the court system from false foreclosure filings—is not undermined, the DueDiligence Affirmation must be filed with the summons and complaint.
For those settlement conferences that the court schedules without the filing of an RJI,require that at the initial settlement conference the foreclosure law firm file the RJI withthe corresponding $95 fee prior to the second settlement conference.
To combat the foreclosure law firms' abuse of motions and stipulations seeking todiscontinue actions unilaterally, permit attorneys to appear for the limited purpose of opposing the discontinuance. Discontinuances without loan modifications are not beneficial to homeowners; indeed, MFY’s experience has proven that such discon -
tinuances greatly lessen the likelihood that homeowners will be able to save their homes.In addition to permitting limited appearances in this context, OCA should work with legalservices providers to create a pro se opposition form that homeowners can file with theassistance of the court’s pro se office, the weekly foreclosure prevention clinic, or withthe assistance of bar applicants seeking to fulfill the mandatory 50-hour pro bono
requirement.
The New York State Legislature should amend CPLR § 8018(a)(1)(ii) to increase the
residential foreclosure filing fee surcharge from $190 to $340, raising the cost of filing aresidential foreclosure action to $550 ($210 to purchase the index number and $340 for the residential foreclosure surcharge). If OCA adopts the policies listed above, it will bear the direct economic and administrative brunt of foreclosure law firms' abusive practices, particularly if it has to manually examine all prior foreclosure filings andschedule settlement conferences. Furthermore, CPLR § 8018(a)(1)(ii) should be amended
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 6/134
I. Background: Summary of Justice Deceived
On August 2, 2011, MFY published Justice Deceived , which documented foreclosure lawfirms’ recent and widespread practice of filing foreclosure summons and complaints, but notfiling the RJI. It is the filing of the RJI, which is required to be filed with the filing of proof of service ( see Uniform Rules § 202.12-a), that enables the court to schedule a foreclosuresettlement conference. The foreclosure settlement conference part—a court-supervisedmediation in which the homeowner stands the best chance of obtaining a mortgage loanmodification and avoiding unnecessary foreclosure—was created by the New York Statelegislature as a response to the huge increase in residential foreclosure cases that hit the New
York courts in 2008. The rules governing the settlement conference part can be found in CPLR Rule 3408 and are discussed in greater detail in Justice Deceived .
As MFY discovered and documented in Justice Deceived , New York State’s foreclosurelaw firms routinely violated CPLR Rule 3408 and Uniform Rules § 202.12-a by filingsummonses and complaints in residential foreclosure actions but not filing the RJIs, creating a“shadow docket” of foreclosure cases, and preventing homeowners from entering the one arenawhere they had the greatest chance of obtaining a loan modification or other loss mitigation
options: the foreclosure settlement part.
The foreclosure law firms’ creation of this shadow docket coincided with the OCA'sOctober 2010 requirement that foreclosure law firms sign an affidavit attesting to the accuracy of allegations in the complaint. OCA required the Due Diligence Affirmation in response to therobo-signing scandal that broke in September 2010. With wide-spread robo-signing of foreclosure documents, courts could no longer rely on the allegations in the complaint and thus,to guarantee the integrity of the judicial foreclosure process, OCA required that foreclosure lawfirms submit a Due Diligence Affirmation.
To document this shadow docket, MFY reviewed three months’ worth of residentialforeclosure filings in two of New York City’s hardest hit boroughs, Brooklyn and Queens.These three months included the following:
March 2010 – seven months prior to the robo-signing scandal and the Due Diligence
Affirmation requirement, and used as a “control” month; November 2010 – the first full month after the implementation of the Due Diligence
Requirement; and
March 2011 – five months after the Due Diligence Affirmation requirement went intoeffect
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 7/134
foreclosure cases filed in Brooklyn and Queens in November 2010 and March 2011, theforeclosure law firms were in flagrant violation of the law.
These results stood in stark contrast to the control group of March 2010 residentialforeclosure filings, cases that were filed before the Due Diligence Affirmation requirement. InMarch 2010, in the majority of cases, the RJI was filed within two months of filing theforeclosure summons and complaint. While this still violates the law (the RJI must be filedsimultaneously with the proof of service), the two-month delay is not nearly as damaging tohomeowners as the eight-to-ten-month delay that began to happen after the issuance of the DueDiligence Affirmation requirement.
As detailed in Justice Deceived , this violation has had a disastrous impact onhomeowners, who benefit from court oversight of the loan modification negotiation process.The longer the delay in getting to the settlement conference, the larger the homeowner’s arrearsgrow, and the more difficult it becomes to modify the mortgage. A home that could have beensaved if the case had reached the settlement conference part within two months of the filing of the summons and complaint becomes significantly harder to save ten months down the road.
II. Foreclosure Law Firms’ Behavior Has Changed Only Incrementally
From February through April 2012, MFY re-reviewed the November 2010 and March2011 residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens to determine whether foreclosurelaw firms had corrected their misconduct in the intervening ten months since these cases werefirst reviewed for Justice Deceived . MFY also examined a new, third month—October 2011. Inreviewing this new more recent month, MFY sought to determine whether, since the publicationof its report, foreclosure law firms respect the law in more recently filed cases
a. 43% of the November 2010 and March 2011 Foreclosure Filings
Remain Mired in the Shadow Docket
MFY's re-review of the November 2010 and March 2011 residential foreclosure filings inBrooklyn and Queens revealed that while more RJIs had been filed in the intervening ten monthssince the last review, 43% of all cases are still in the shadow docket.
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 8/134
In November 2010, the first full month after the institution of the Due DiligenceAffirmation requirement, 389 residential foreclosure actions were filed in Brooklyn and Queens.
In 383 of those cases, proofs of service of the summons and complaints were filed with thecounty clerk soon after the action was commenced, triggering the requirement that the RJI andthe Due Diligence Affirmation be filed simultaneously.3 A review of the cases’ docket sheets inApril 2012 revealed, however, that RJIs had been filed in only 159 cases. In another 86 actions,the foreclosing plaintiffs voluntarily discontinued the cases without filing RJIs. Thus, as of April2012— 17 months after the November 2010 filing of those foreclosure actions and the proofs of service—152 cases have yet to move to the settlement conference part and instead sit in theshadow docket. Currently, for those cases filed in November 2010, 39% of the residential
foreclosure cases are in the shadow docket.
When the November 2010 actions were first reviewed in June 2011, 82% of the caseswere in the shadow docket.4 The below charts demonstrate the change in the past ten months for cases filed in November 2010.
No RJIs
82%
Stips to
Discont
but no RJI
5%
RJIs filed
13%
June 2011 Review of November 2010
Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS
No RJIs
39%
Stips to
Discont
but no RJI
22%
RJIs filed
39%
April 2012 Review of November2010
Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS
Similarly, a re-review of the March 2011 residential foreclosure actions revealed that asubstantial number of cases are still in the shadow docket with homeowners unable to obtainrelief in the settlement conference. In Brooklyn and Queens, 524 foreclosure actions were filedin March 2011, with proofs of service filed in 521 of those cases. 5 Yet only 216 RJIs were filedas of April 2012, despite the fact that Uniform Rules § 202.12-a(b)(1) requires that the RJI be
filed simultaneously with the proof of service. For March 2011 foreclosure filings, 68 actionswere voluntarily discontinued without the filing of an RJI. Thus, as of April 2012— 13 months
3See Appendices B & C for a list of all residential foreclosure cases filed in Brooklyn and Queens in November
2010.
10 Months Later
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 9/134
after the March 2011 filing of those foreclosure actions and the proofs of service—240 cases, or 46% of all March 2011 residential foreclosure actions, are still in the shadow docket.
When the March 2011 filings were first reviewed almost a year ago in June 2011, 91% of cases were in the shadow docket.6 The below charts graphically portray the change in the pastten months.
No RJIs
91%
Stips toDiscont
but no RJI
0%
RJIs filed
9%
June 2011 Review of March 2011
Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS
No RJIs
46%
Stips to
Discont
but no RJI
13%
RJIs filed
41%
April 2012 Review of March 2011
Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS
While it is true that in the intervening 10 months, foreclosure law firms have begun to fileRJIs and more homeowners have reached the settlement conference, foreclosure law firms arestill in violation of the law in 43% of foreclosure cases filed in November 2010 and March 2011.For homeowners who remain in the shadow docket, their chances of obtaining a mortgagemodification, if and when they get to the settlement conference process, decrease each day whilethey remain in this limbo-state. A recent study by the National Consumer Law Center demonstrates that mediation programs like New York State's settlement conferences significantly
increase the number of sustainable loan modifications.7
b. More Recent Filings Show that Any Behavioral Change Was an Aberration
The April 2012 review of the November 2010 and March 2011 foreclosure filingsdemonstrated that while a large number of homeowners still languish in the shadow docket, atleast there was a decrease from the June 2011 review of the shadow docket for those two months.
To determine if the glimmer of foreclosure law firms’ improvements denoted systemicimprovement, MFY reviewed residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens for a morerecent month: October 2011. Presumably, after the publication of Justice Deceived in August2011, foreclosure law firms would have responded to exposure of the existence of the hugeshadow docket and modified their behavior in terms of handling future foreclosure cases. But a
i f th O t b 2011 id ti l f l fili i B kl d Q th t
10 Months Later
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 10/134
proofs of services were filed in 359 cases.8 Although the law requires foreclosure firms tosimultaneously file RJIs with those proofs of service, as of April 2012, only 92 RJIs were filed in
Brooklyn and Queens for residential foreclosure cases filed in October 2011. Another 12 caseswere voluntarily discontinued without the filing of an RJI, leaving 264 cases in the shadowdocket. Thus, as of April 2012—six months after the October 2011 filing of the summons andcomplaint—72% of residential foreclosure cases are in the shadow docket.
Any hope that the August 2011 publication of Justice Deceived and OCA’s attention tothe shadow docket issue had caused foreclosure law firms to alter their behavior is belied by theOctober 2011 data.
No RJIs
72%
Stips toDiscont but
no RJI
3%
RJIs filed
25%
April 2012 Review of October 2011
Foreclosure Cases in BK & QNS
c. Foreclosure Law Firms File Discontinuances without Any Basis in 12% of All Cases
A review of the November 2010 and March 2011 residential foreclosure filings inBrooklyn and Queens raises a new issue: the filing of discontinuances.
Actions are generally discontinued if the two parties reach a settlement and there is nolonger a reason to proceed with the action. In the context of a foreclosure action, discontinuanceis filed if a loan modification is reached, the homeowner is able to pay off the arrears, a shortsale is agreed upon, or the parties agree upon some other work-out that moots the foreclosureaction.
In some cases, the parties filed stipulations and motions to discontinue stating that thecase was settled. In 12% of the residential foreclosure cases filed in Brooklyn and Queens in November 2010 and March 2011, however, discontinuances were filed without providing anyb i f th di ti O l i th t b d f thi ti i th t th
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 11/134
Number of Cases
As of March 2012
Cases filed in
November 2010
Total = 389
BK & QNS
Cases filed in
March 2011
Total = 524
BK & QNS
Cases filed in
October 2011
Total = 368
BK & QNS
Discontinued by Motion or by Stipulation
(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)
103
(27%)
91
(17%)
12
(3%)
Discontinued because of Settlement Dueto a Loan Modification/Loss Mitigation
(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)
31
(8%)
39
(7%)
3
(1%)
Discontinued Due to Bank’s Filing Error (e.g. bank failed to provide homeowner withthe required RPAPL notice)(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)
4
(1%)
3
(0.5%)
0
(0%)
Discontinued with No Reason Given
(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)
63
(16%)
45
(8.6%)
9
(2.5%)
Reviewer was Unable to View Filings
(% of total foreclosure filings for that month)
5
(1%)
4
(1%)
0
(0%)
Allowing a foreclosure law firm to discontinue an action after its examination of the factsof the case reveal that there were problems with the initial summons and complaint only further damages and prejudices homeowners, especially those who were trying to negotiate a mortgagemodification.9 With a discontinuance, a homeowner has no hope of getting before a judge untilthe Plaintiff re-files the case, which could take months. During this time, arrears continue to
accrue, making a mortgage modification more difficult to achieve when the case is re-filed.
The Due Diligence Affirmation was designed to prevent false allegations in foreclosurecomplaints. The 12% rate of groundless discontinuances combined with the 43% of cases thatcontinue to sit in the shadow docket reflect that the Due Diligence Affirmation is currently nothaving its intended effect. For cases filed in November 2010 and March 2011 in Brooklyn andQueens, 55% of all residential foreclosure complaints appear to be unreliable, or at the very leastsuspect, as evidenced by the foreclosure law firms’ own actions, or more aptly, inaction.
d. One Bright Spot: Courts Quickly Schedule Conferences after Cases
Are Removed from the Shadow Docket
A positive finding revealed in MFY’s re-review of residential foreclosure actions is thatthe courts schedule settlement conferences fairly quickly. Thus, if foreclosure firms actually
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 12/134
followed the law and filed the RJI simultaneous with the filing of the proof of service,homeowners could almost be assured of a prompt settlement conference.
In those cases where an RJI is filed, Uniform Rules § 202.12-a(c) requires that the courtschedule a settlement conference within 60 days of the filing of the RJI. Queens Supreme Courthas fared better than Kings Supreme Court in scheduling the first settlement conference in lessthan the 60 days required by the rule. In Queens, for cases filed in November 2010, the averagetime between an RJI filing and the first settlement conference in Queens was 50 days; for casesfiled in March 2011, it was 53 days; and for cases filed in October 2011, it was 48 days.
Kings Supreme Court, on the other hand, usually takes more than the 60 days affordedunder the Uniform Rules to schedule an initial conference. In Brooklyn, for cases filed in November 2010, the average time between an RJI filing and the first settlement conference was68 days, slightly outside the time limit; for cases filed in March 2011, it was 64 days; and for cases filed in October 2011, it was 83 days, significantly outside the time limit allotted by courtrule.
OCA stands ready to schedule settlement conferences within the time demanded by the
Uniform Rules. If the foreclosure law firms began filing RJIs with the proof of services for newly filed cases, getting homeowners quickly into a settlement conference within 60 days iscertainly possible. However, OCA will likely require some flexibility for those cases currentlysitting in the shadow docket, likely in the tens of thousands. To schedule settlement conferencesin all cases in the shadow docket within the 60 days might prove difficult; OCA should not becriticized for what is the fault of the foreclosure law firms—the creation of the shadow docket.
III. Conclusion
MFY's re-examination of the November 2010 and March 2011 foreclosure filings and itsnew review of October 2011 foreclosure filings reveals the foreclosure law firms’ continuedviolations of the Uniform Rules, which burdens the court system, damages individualhomeowners—some irreparably—and prevents the economy from recovering. As a result, MFYstrongly urges OCA to adopt the policies and practices outlined earlier in Summary of Findingsand Recommendations.
Additionally, as OCA bears the economic brunt of solving the this crisis caused by NewYork's foreclosure law firms, MFY urges the New York State Legislature to amend CPLR §8018(a)(1)(ii) to increase the foreclosure filing surcharge to $340. The amendment shouldclearly state that this foreclosure filing surcharge should not be passed onto homeowners under pain of treble damages, costs and attorney’s fees.
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 13/134
APPENDIX A
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 14/134
Methodology
This investigation of the foreclosure law firms’ abuse of the Due Diligence Affirmationwas conducted by MFY Legal Services, Inc. (“MFY”) from February 2012 through April 2012.
The data is derived from publicly available information located in the County Clerks’ Offices in
Brooklyn and Queens. As with the first report, Brooklyn and Queens were chosen because they
remain the hardest hit counties in New York City in terms of foreclosures.
MFY re-reviewed residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens for: (1)
November 2010, the first full month after the institution of the Due Diligence Affirmation; and
(2) March 2011, the fifth full month after the Due Diligence Affirmation requirement to
\determine if November 2010’s data was only a short-term response to the Due Diligence
Affirmation requirement. In addition, MFY conducted research on a new and more recent
month: October 2011. MFY analyzed all residential foreclosure cases filed in Brooklyn and
Queens in October 2011.
Determining the number of residential foreclosure filings in each month was a two-step
process. First, MFY searched the “Judgment and Lien Book” located in the County Clerks’
offices for each month to determine upon which properties notices of pendency were filed. From
that search, MFY was able to identify all foreclosure actions filed in each county and obtain the
index number for each foreclosure. Once MFY had these index numbers, it was able to move to
step two, reviewing the case files for each of these index numbers to determine if they were
residential foreclosures. Those identified as such were analyzed to determine whether RJIs,
answers, stipulations to discontinue or any other papers were filed. For each residential
foreclosure action identified, MFY possesses a copy of the Clerk of Court’s docket sheet.
In order to determine if and when a settlement conference was scheduled, MFY reviewed
the Unified Court Systems online case information system located at
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/ecourtsMain.
On this re-review, for November 2010, MFY analyzed 389 residential foreclosure filings
in Brooklyn and Queens. This was a reduction from the 393 cases analyzed in the August 2011 Justice Deceived as it became apparent as the case progressed that some cases originally
considered residential foreclosures were in fact commercial mortgages. MFY does not believe
that this change has a significant impact on its analysis. For March 2011, MFY re-reviewed 524
residential foreclosure filing in Brooklyn and Queens. Again, there was a reduction from the 529
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 15/134
Overall, MFY reviewed case histories for 1,281 residential foreclosure filings to produce
this update.
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 16/134
APPENDIX B
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 17/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 1
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
1. Baum –
Atty Change GPO
12/27/11
26940/10 Wells F 11/1/10 11/30/10 8/15/11
Filed by P
8/15/11
&10/31/11
Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 2/25/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference: 11/22/11
2. Baum 26939/10 Wells F 11/1/10 11/16/10 No No No Answer filed on 2/3/11
Notice of Appearance filed on 2/25/11
Rejection of Answer filed 3/3/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/31/11 – noreason
3. Baum 26927/10 Wells F 11/1/10 11/16/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/7/11 – no
reason
4. Baum 27875/10 Wells F 11/12/10 11/30/10 1/10/12
Filed by P
No No Motion to Discontinue Action filed 1/26/12
– no reason
Ecourts: Motion Return Date 1/18/12
5. Baum 27874/10 Wells F 11/12/10 11/30/10 8/26/11
Unable toOpen
Unable to
Open
No Unable to open the RJI in Court’s docket
6. Baum 27876/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/23/10 1/18/12
Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 11/24/10
Notice of Appearance filed on 1/4/11
Motion to Discontinue Action filed 1/18/12
– no reasonEcourts: Motion Return date 1/27/12
7.
Baum 28174/10 HSBC 11/16/10 12/2/10 5/20/11Filed by P No Yes Motion to discontinue filed 5/20/11 – noreason
Order Discontinuing action filed 8/30/11
Notice of Entry filed 11/1/11Ecourts: Motion return date 6/29/11
8. Baum 28173/10 Wells F 11/16/10 12/14/10 4/21/11 No Yes FILED AS PILLAR
Reply to Counterclaims filed 1/14/11
Amended Motion to Discontinue filed
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 18/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 2
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
4/21/11 – no reason
Ecourts: Motion Return Date 5/18/11
9. Baum –
Atty Change Davidson
Fink
1/9/12
28165/10 Citimtg 11/16/10 12/6/10 6/15/11
Filed by P
6/15/11 Yes FILED AS PILLAR
Case Status Ltr filed 7/5/11Referee’s Directive filed 10/25/11 –
Defendant to provide documents
Notice of Appearance filed 1/12/12
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/21/1110. Baum –
Atty Change
Rosicki
12/9/11
28164/10 Wells F 11/16/10 11/30/10 11/23/11Filed by P
No Yes FILED AS PILLARMotion to dismiss filed 11/22/11
Recusal Order filed 12/14/11
Order filed 1/30/12Ecourts: Motion return date 11/30/11
11. Baum 28292/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/30/10 6/17/11Filed by P
No Yes Answer filed on 1/10/11Reply to Counterclaims filed on 1/12/11
Motion to Discontinue Action filed 6/17/11– no reasonNotice of Appearance filed 10/19/11
Order filed 2/2/12
Ecourts: Motion return date 6/21/11
12. Baum –
Atty Change
Fein12/7/11
28287/10 Wells F 11/17/10 12/7/10 7/1/11
Filed by P
7/1/11 Yes FILED AS PILLAR
Answer filed on 1/13/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/2/11
13. Baum –
Atty Change
Shapiro12/29/11
28286/10 PNC 11/17/10 11/30/10 No No No FILED AS PILLAR
14. Baum –
Atty Change 28284/10 Wells F 11/17/10 1/12/11 6/22/11
Filed by P6/22/11 Yes FILED AS PILLAR
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/27/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 19/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 3
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Rosicki
12/19/11
15. Baum –
Atty Change GPO
12/27/11
28282/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/30/10 6/22/11
Filed by P
6/22/11 Yes FILED AS PILLAR
Consent to change attorney filed on2/10/11
Notices of Appearances filed 7/1/11,
8/1/11, 11/21/11
Ecourts: First FCP conference 7/27/1116. Baum –
Atty Change
GPO
12/27/11
28345/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/30/10 8/31/11Filed by P
8/31/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/15/10Reply to counterclaims filed on 12/29/10
Notice of Appearance filed on 1/13/11
Notice of Appearance filed on 2/25/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/2/11
17. Baum –
Atty Change
DavidsonFink 11/29/11
28530/10 Aurora 11/19/10 12/13/10 No No No
18. Baum 28531/10 HSBC 11/19/10 12/7/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/20/11Stip cancelling lis pendens filed on 3/24/11
– mtg reinstated
19. Baum 28532/10 HSBC 11/19/10 12/6/10 1/20/12
Filed by P
No Yes Amended Aff of Service Filed on 12/13/10
Motion to Discontinue filed 1/20/11 – noreasonEcourts: Motion Return Date 1/30/12
20. Baum 28639/10 Citimtg 11/22/10 12/7/10 9/21/11Filed by P
No Yes FILED AS PILLARMotion to Discontinue filed 9/21/11 – no
reason
Order discontinuing action filed 10/24/11Ecourts: Motion return date 10/12/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 20/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 4
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
21. Baum –
Atty Change
Davidson
Fink
1/19/12
28675/10 Citimtg 11/22/10 12/6/10 5/27/11
Filed by P
5/27/12 Yes FILED AS PILLAR
Answer filed on 12/15/10Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/28/11
22. Baum –
Atty Change
Frenkel12/19/11
28820/10 WellsF 11/23/10 12/7/10 No No No
23. Baum –
Atty Change
DavidsonFink
11/29/11
28945/10 Aurora 11/24/10 12/16/10 No No No
24. Baum 28983/10 HSBC 11/24/10 2/10/11 No No No FILED AS PILLAR
25. Baum –
Atty Change
Frenkel12/22/11
29096/10 Wells F 11/29/10 4/22/11 7/20/11
Filed by P
7/20/11 Yes Answer filed 1/11/11
P’s response to Discovery Demands filed
6/8/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/16/11
26. Baum 29118/10 Fannie Mae 11/29/10 12/21/10 11/15/11Filed by P
11/15/11 Yes Answer filed 1/11/11P’s response to Discovery Demands filed
6/8/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/22/12
27. Baum 29233/10 GMAC 11/30/10 12/13/10 No No No FILED AS PILAR
Notice of Appearance filed on 1/10/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/22/11 - no
reason
28. Fein 26919/10 Household 11/1/10 11/8/10 No No No
29. Fein 27094/10 Aurora 11/3/10 11/10/10 No No No Rejection of Answer filed on 12/29/10
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 21/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 5
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
30. Fein 27085/10 Aurora 11/3/10 11/10/10 1/27/12
Filed by P
1/27/12 Yes Answer filed on 12/1/10
Rejection of answer filed on 12/29/10Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/27/12
31. Fein 27091/10 ResidentialFunding
11/3/10 11/12/10 No No No
32. Fein 27092/10 HSBC 11/3/10 11/12/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/17/10
33. Fein 27096/10 1ST
United 11/3/10 11/15/10 5/16/11
Filed by P
5/16/11 Yes Motion for Order of Referenced filed
5/16/11Notice of Appearance filed 7/5/11
Order filed 10/11/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/28/11
34. Fein 27250/10 US Bank 11/3/10 11/12/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/16/10Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/22/11 – loss
mitigation
35. Fein 27357/10 HSBC 11/5/10 11/12/10 12/2/11
Filed by P
12/2/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/14/10
Rejection of Answer filed on 12/21/10Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/7/12
36. Fein 27358/10 Nationstar 11/5/10 11/12/10 No No No
37. Fein 27359/10 Deutsche 11/5/10 11/18/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/17/10
Rejection of Answer filed 10/6/11
Answer filed 10/12/11
38. Fein 27507/10 Nationstar 11/8/10 11/15/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 4/12/11 – mtg
reinstated39. Fein 27506/10 Flagstar 11/8/10 11/22/10 6/22/11Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 1/11/11Settlement Conf. Notice filed 11/7/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/27/11
40. Fein 27720/10 HSBC 11/10/10 11/22/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 2/10/11
41. Fein 27721/10 BeneficialHome
11/10/10 11/18/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/26/11 – lossmitigation
42. Fein 27719/10 Household 11/10/10 11/19/10 No No No
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 22/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 6
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
43. Fein 27718/10 Bayview 11/10/10 12/8/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/17/11 – mtg
modification
44. Fein 27720/10 HSBC 11/10/10 11/22/10 No No No Notice of Appearance Filed on 2/10/11
45. Fein 27882/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 NONE No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/11/12 – no
reason
46. Fein 27779/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/24/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/13/10
Notice of Appearance filed on 12/21/10
Demand for Notice and Inspection filed on2/2/11
47. Fein 28062/10 US Bank 11/15/10 11/23/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/15/10
48. Fein 28063/10 Wells F 11/15/10 11/29/10 No No No Rejection of Answer filed on 1/25/11
49. Fein –Atty Change
Hinshaw
9/19/11
28061/10 Deutsche 11/15/10 12/1/10 No No No Reply filed on 3/31/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/1/11 – no
reason
50. Fein 28067/10 Beneficial
Home
11/15/10 11/29/10 10/6/11
Filed by D
1/23/11 Yes OSC filed by D 10/6/11
Court Order 12/5/11Notice of Appearance filed 1/24/11
Ecourts: Motion return date 10/6/11
Ecourts: First FCP 1/24/12 (after OSC
decided )
51. Fein 28068/10 NY
CommunityBank
11/15/10 11/23/10 No No No
52. Fein 28281/10 HSBC 11/17/10 12/8/10 No No No Notice of Appearance Filed on 12/21/10
53. Fein 28386/10 HSBC 11/18/10 11/30/10 No No No
54. Fein 28525/10 Beneficial
Home
11/19/10 11/29/10 10/25/11
Filed by D
No Yes Answer filed on 1/24/11
Rejection of Answer filed on 2/7/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/1/12
55. Fein 28521/10 Wells F 11/19/10 12/10/10 2/14/12 2/14/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/2/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 23/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 7
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Filed by P
56. Fein 28653/10 US Bank 11/22/10 12/3/10 8/19/11
Filed by P
8/19/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/9/12
57. Fein 28654/10 Wells F 11/22/10 12/10/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/7/11 – mtg
paid off
58. Fein 28661/10 HSBC 11/22/10 12/8/10 No No No
59. Fein 28662/10 GMAC 11/22/10 12/3/10 No No No
60. Fein 28806/10 HSBC 11/23/10 12/14/10 No No No61. Fein 28951/10 Chase 11/24/10 NONE No No No
62. Fein 28949/10 HSBC 11/24/10 12/10/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/22/11 – loss
mitigation
63. Fein 28950/10 HSBC 11/24/10 12/22/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/22/10Demand for Appearances filed on 12/22/10
Notice to Produce filed on 12/22/10
64. Fein 29115/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/7/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 6/7/11
65. Fein 29238/10 BranchBanking
11/30/10 12/6/10 No No No
66. McCabe 26917/10 BeneficialHomeowner
11/1/10 4/19/11 No No No
67. McCabe 27608/10 Wells F 11/9/10 12/2/10 No No No
68. McCabe 27776/10 DeutscheBank
11/12/10 12/7/10 No No No
69. McCabe 28179/10 Aurora 11/16/10 12/30/10 1/13/12Filed by P
1/13/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/2/12
70. McCabe 28290/10 DeutscheBank
11/17/10 12/2/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/18/11 – noreason
71. McCabe 28289/10 US Bank 11/17/10 12/9/10 No No No Answered filed on 1/5/11
72. McCabe 28288/10 US Bank 11/17/10 12/2/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/7/11 – noreason
73. McCabe 28285/10 US Bank 11/17/10 12/9/10 No No No Notice of appearance and Answer filed on
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 24/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 8
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
12/22/10
Notice of appearance filed on 3/4/11
74. McCabe 28283/10 BofA 11/17/10 12/2/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/2/10
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/16/10 – noreason
75. McCabe 28381/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/7/10 11/30/11Filed by D
No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/15/12
76. McCabe 28382/10 Wells F 11/18/10 12/10/10 3/31/11 &4/11/11
Filed by P
No Yes Answer filed on 1/4/11Reply to Answer filed on 1/21/11
Consent to change attorney filed on
2/10/11Answer filed on 3/24/11
OSC filed on 3/31/11
Cross motion filed 4/26/11Court order filed 7/14/11
Motion to convert to money judgment filed10/25/11Notice of Appearance filed 12/12/11
Notice of address change filed 1/23/12
Ecourts: Motion Return Date 4/11/11
77. McCabe 28383/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/2/10 12/28/11
Filed by D
No Yes Answer filed on 2/1/11
Answer amended with AffirmativeDefenses and counterclaims on 2/18/11
Answer filed on 3/1/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference4/3/12
78. McCabe 28384/10 BofA 11/18/10 11/30/10 No No No
79. McCabe 28665/10 US Bank 11/22/10 1/24/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/9/11
Answer filed on 3/18/11
80. McCabe 28802/10 US Bank 11/23/10 12/14/10 9/21/11
Filed by P
9/21/11 No Answer filed on 1/3/11
Notice of Discovery and Inspection of
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 25/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 9
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Documents filed on 1/28/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/1/11
81. McCabe 28798/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/23/10 12/9/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/9/12 – no
reason
82. McCabe 28948/10 US Bank 11/24/10 1/5/11 9/21/11
Filed by P
9/21/11 No
83. McCabe 29114/10 Wells F 11/29/10 12/16/10 No No No Amended Affidavit of Service filed on
12/16/1084. McCabe 29116/10 Deutsche
Bank 11/29/10 12/23/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/26/11 – no
reason
85. McCabe 29237/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/14/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/14/10Answer filed on 1/28/11
86. Rosicki 26959/10 Select
Portfolio
11/1/10 11/17/10 No No No
87. Rosicki 26961/10 Aurora 11/1/10 11/15/10 11/2/11
Filed by P
11/2/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/13/12
88. Rosicki 27097/10 Metlife 11/3/10 11/17/10 No No No Answer with counterclaims and defenses
filed on 12/2/10
Reply to answer filed on 12/8/10Notice of appearance filed on 3/1/11
89. Rosicki 27285/10 Kondaur 11/4/10 11/16/10 2/14/11Filed by P
2/14/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/13/11
90.
Rosicki 27432/10 US Bank 11/5/10 11/19/10 No No No91. Rosicki 28573/10 Indymac 11/19/10 12/1/10 2/22/11
Filed by P2/22/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/7/10
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/13/11
92. Rosicki 28831/10 US Bank 11/23/10 1/4/11 No No No Answer filed on 12/15/10
93. Rosicki 28829/10 Citimtg 11/23/10 12/3/10 No No No
94. Rosicki 28830/10 DLJ
Mortgage
11/23/10 12/6/10 12/7/11
Filed by P
11/2/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/7/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 26/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 10
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
95. Rosicki 28832/10 BankUnited 11/23/10 12/13/10 12/22/10
Filed by P
12/22/10 Yes Answer filed on 12/22/10
Reply to answer filed on 1/6/11Order filed 8/1/11 – removed from FCP
due to inadequate income
Affidavit of Serviced filed 8/4/11Motion for SJ filed 9/26/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/24/11
96. Rosicki 29012/10 US Bank 11/24/10 12/7/10 12/14/10Filed by P
12/14/10 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/20/11
97. Rosicki 29242/10 US Bank 11/30/10 12/20/10 12/29/10
Filed by P
12/29/10 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/24/11
98. Shapiro 27884/10 US Bank 11/12/10 12/17/10 No No No
99. Shapiro 27777/10 US Bank 11/12/10 11/24/10 10/5/11
Filed by P
10/5/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/1/10
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 12/14/11
100 Shapiro 27928/10 US Bank 11/12/10 1/7/11 1/10/12
Filed by P
1/10/12 No Amended Affidavit of Service filed on
1/27/11Notice of Pendency refilled on 2/14/11Motion for Order of Ref & Aff of Service
filed 1/10/12
Ecourts: Motion return date 2/29/12
101 Shapiro 27935/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/12/10 12/9/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/10/10
Notice of Appearance filed on 3/4/11
102 Shapiro 27936/10 DeutscheBank 11/12/10 2/17/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/17/10
103 Shapiro 27780/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/12/10 12/17/10 7/19/11
Filed by P
7/19/11 No Notice of Appearance filed on 3/1/11
Motion for Order of Ref filed 11/17/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/16/11
104 Shapiro 27932/10 HSBC 11/12/10 12/7/10 6/2/11Filed by P
6/2/11 Yes Motion for Order of Ref filed 11/18/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/13/11
105 Shapiro 27930/10 HSBC 11/12/10 12/6/10 4/5/11 4/5/11 Yes Motion for order of refe filed on 4/28/11
i C
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 27/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 11
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Filed by P Special referee directive stating loan
modified – 8/8/11Letter filed 8/10/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/29/11 – mtg
modifiedEcourts: First FCP conference 5/19/11
106 Shapiro 27778/10 Wells F 11/12/10 1/18/11 6/10/11
Filed by P
6/10/11 Yes Referee Directive – removed from FCP
due to D defaultMotion for Order of Ref filed 11/29/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/20/11
107 Shapiro 27880/10 Fannie Mae 11/12/10 3/31/11 No No No Affidavit of Service filed on 3/31/11
108 Shapiro 27877/10 Bank of NY 11/12/10 12/6/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/7/10
Reply to answer filed on 1/4/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/20/11 – noreason
109 Shapiro 27929/10 Citimtg 11/12/10 12/22/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/2/10Reply to answer filed on 12/17/10
110 Shapiro 27933/10 Citimtg 11/12/10 12/16/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/27/11 – no
reason
111 Shapiro 27934/10 PHH
Mortgage
11/12/10 1/25/11 No No No Amended Affidavits of Service filed on
1/3/11, 1/4/11, 1/25/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/9/11 – no
reason
112 Shapiro 27931/10 PHH
Mortgage
11/12/10 12/7/10 No No No Amended Affidavit of Service filed 1/6/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/18/11 – no
reason
113 Shapiro 28180/10 HSBC 11/16/10 12/6/10 12/15/11
Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 3/1/11
Motion to Discontinue filed 12/15/11 – noreason
Ki C t N b 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 28/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 12
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Ecourts: Motion return date 1/13/12
114 Shapiro 28250/10 PHH
Mortgage
11/17/10 1/11/11 8/4/11
Filed by P
8/4/11 Yes Amended Affidavits of Service filed on
2/16/11, 2/22/11, 3/8/11
Order for Publication filed 9/13/11Affidavit of Publication filed 11/29/11
Ecourts: No details listed for the case
115 Shapiro 28249/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/17/10 1/5/11 8/2/11
Filed by P
8/2/11 Yes Motion for Order for Ref filed by 12/15/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/22/11
116 Shapiro 28385/10 US Bank 11/18/10 1/21/11 11/9/11
Filed by P
11/9/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/15/10
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/28/12
117 Shapiro 28370/10 DeutscheBank
11/17/10 1/24/11 4/7/11Filed by P
4/7/11 Yes Case Status Ltr filed 6/28/11Motion for Order of Ref filed 7/7/11
Motion to Discontinue filed 1/20/12 – no
reason
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/19/11Ecourts: Motion return date 2/10/12
118 Shapiro 28526/10 US Bank 11/19/10 12/310 11/29/11
Filed by P
11/29/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 10/17/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/7/12
119 Shapiro 28657/10 Wells F 11/22/10 1/31/11 6/16/11
Filed by P
6/16/11 Yes Amended Affidavit of Service filed on
1/31/11
Motion for Order of Ref filed 7/5/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/26/11
120 Shapiro 28660/10 US Bank 11/22/10 12/7/10 8/19/11Filed by P
8/19/11&
1/23/12
Yes Notices of Appearance filed on 1/7/11,2/22/11 & 1/23/12
Reply to Counterclaims filed on 1/11/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/27/11
121 Shapiro -
Atty Change
Sheldon
28663/10 Wells F 11/22/10 2/2/11 12/2/11
Filed by P
12/2/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/16/10
Amended Affidavits of service filed on1/11/11, 1/14/11, 1/18/11, 1/27/11, 2/2/11
Kings County November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 29/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 13
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
May
4/29/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/10/12
122 Shapiro 28847/10 Fannie Mae 11/23/10 12/28/10 No No No Verified answer filed on 12/30/10
Reply filed on 1/14/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/10/11 – no
reason
123 Shapiro 29048/10 US Bank 11/26/10 12/15/10 7/14/11
Filed by P
7/14/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 1/4/11
Motion for Order of Ref filed 12/2/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/11/11
124 Sweeney 26949/10 Citimtg 11/1/10 11/17/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/28/11 –
mtg reinstated
125 Sweeney –
Atty Change
Katz &
Rychik
2/10/11
27275/10 Citibank 11/3/10 12/2/10 5/11/11Filed by P
No Yes Notices of Appearance filed on 12/2/10and 12/16/10
Answer an Interrogatories filed on
12/16/10
Change of Address filed 8/29/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/15/11
126 Sweeney 27751/10 Citimtg 11/10/10 11/18/10 No No No
127 Sweeney 27911/10 Citimtg 11/10/10 11/22/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 3/3/11- mtgreinstated
128 Sweeney 27912/10 Citimtg 11/12/10 12/8/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/9/10
129 Sweeney 27914/10 Citibank 11/12/10 2/24/11 No No No
130 Sweeney 28094/10 Citimtg 11/15/10 12/1/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/11/11 – noreasonNotice of appearance filed on 12/9/10
131 Sweeney 28192/10 Citimtg 11/16/10 1/3/10 No No No Additional affidavit of service filed on1/3/11
132 Sweeney 28696/10 Citimtg 11/22/10 12/9/10 No No No
133 Sweeney 28697/10 Citimtg 11/22/10 12/14/10 No No No Notice of appearance filed on 12/9/10 and3/15/11
Kings County November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 30/134
Kings County – November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 14
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
134 Sweeney 29125/10 Citibank 11/29/10 12/15/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/12/11 –
mtg reinstated
135 Sweeney 29249/10 Citimtg 11/30/10 12/15/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/15/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/5/11 –mtg modified
136 Dorf –
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
26975/10 US Bank 11/1/10 1/21/10 No No No
137 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
26976/10 HSBC 11/1/10 12/3/10 No No No
138 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
27498/10 HSBC 11/8/10 11/18/10 No No No
139 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
27500/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/8/10 11/29/10 No No No
140 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
27467/10 DeutscheBank
11/8/10 12/7/10 No No No Affidavit of Service filed 2/1/12
141 Dorf 27499/10 Wells F 11/8/10 11/17/10 No No No
142 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
28035/10 HSBC 11/15/10 12/6/10 No No No
Kings County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 31/134
Kings County November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 15
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
143 Dorf 28359/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/18/10 12/13/10 8/3/11
Filed by P
8/3/11 No Motion for order to appoint referee filed
8/3/11Ecourts: No record
144 Dorf 28361/10 DeutscheBank
11/18/10 12/1/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/25/11 –case settled
145 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
28362/10 HSBC 11/18/10 12/9/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 2/10/11
146 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
28360/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/18/10 12/1/10 No No No
147 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
28743/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/23/10 12/23/10 No No No
148 Dorf–
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
29212/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/10/10 No No No
149 Dorf 29214/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/17/10 No No No
150 Dorf 29213/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/17/10 No No No Reply filed on 1/7/11 (no answer listed as
filed)
151 Dorf 29211/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/17/10 No No No
152 Frenkel 27100/10 BofA 11/3/10 11/16/10 2/16/11
Filed by P
2/16/11 Yes Motion coverpage filed 2/16/11
Judgment filed 7/8/11
Motion to Discontinue filed 9/23/11 – noreason
Ecourts: Motion return date 3/14/11
Kings County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 32/134
Kings County November 2010
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 16
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
153 Frenkel 27501/10 OneWest 11/8/10 12/7/10 No No No CPLR 8019D filed 1/10/12
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/10/12 – noreason
154 Frenkel 27609/10 OneWest 11/9/10 11/26/10 1/20/12Filed by D
No No Order to Show Cause filed 1/20/12Ecourts: OSC return date 1/23/12
155 Frenkel 28176/10 Chase 11/16/10 12/6/10 No No No
156 Frenkel 28685/10 BofA 11/22/10 12/23/10 3/17/11
Filed by P
No Yes Motion coverpage fee paid on 3/17/11
Judgment filed 7/18/11 & 1/5/12Ecourts: Motion return date 3/29/11
157 Frenkel 28952/10 Deutsche
Bank
11/24/10 12/13/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/14/11 – no
reason
158 Stein 27126/10 Chase 11/3/10 12/1/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/22/10
Answer filed on 12/29/10
159 Stein 27534/10 US Bank 11/8/10 11/19/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/21/11 –
case settled
160 Stein 27536/10 US Bank 11/8/10 11/29/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/1/10Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/9/12 – no
reason
161 Stein 28093/10 PHH 11/15/10 11/30/10 7/11/11Filed by P
7/11/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/10/11
162 Stein 28308/10 Chase 11/17/10 12/10/10 No No No
163 Stein 28550/10 Onewest 11/19/10 12/3/10 10/6/11
Filed by P
10/6/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/14/10
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/24/12164 Stein 28549/10 US Bank 11/19/10 12/17/10 8/22/11Filed by P
8/22/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/27/11
165 Lynch 28988/10 FlushingSavings
11/24/10 12/22/10 3/4/11Filed by P
12/29/11 Yes Motion Coverpage fees paid on 3/4/11,12/30/11, & 2/6/12
Aff of Service filed 12/30/11
Ecourts: Motion return date 1/13/12
166 Lynch – 28989/10 Flushing 11/24/10 12/13/10 8/24/11 No Yes Motion coverpage fee paid 8/24/11
Kings County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 33/134
g y
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 17
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Atty Change
Konner11/2/11
Savings Filed by P Ecourts: No details listed
167 May 28358/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/6/10 1/19/11Filed by P
1/19/11 Yes Answer filed on 12/22/10Motion to Discontinue filed 1/3/12 –
modified
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/17/11
168 May 27878/10 US Bank 11/12/10 1/12/11 3/15/11Filed by P
3/15/11&1/18/11
Yes Affidavit filed on 3/15/11Case Status Ltr filed on 6/28/11Motion for Order of Ref filed 1/18/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/15/11
169 May 28994/10 Waterfall
Victoria
Master Fund
11/24/10 12/10/11 01/19/11
Filed by P
1/19/11 Yes Notices of Appearance filed 5/25/111 &
6/2/11
Referee’s directive filed 10/25/11 –removed from FCP due D’s lack of income
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/17/11170 May 28995/10 US Bank 11/24/10 12/10/10 2/1/11
Filed by P
2/1/11 Yes Reply filed on 4/13/11
Notice of Appearance filed 5/19/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference4/15/11
171 Weinreb –
Atty Change
Katz
1/6/11
27881/20 Deutsche
Bank
11/12/10 12/8/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/6/10
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/23/11 –mtg modified
172 Weinreb 27879/10 Wells Fargo 11/12/10 12/1/10 2/2/11
Filed by P
No Yes Motion coverpage fee paid on 2/2/11
Order to discontinue action filed on
3/10/11 – homeowner deadAuthorization to appear filed on 4/14/11
Notice of appearance filed on 4/14/11
Ecourts: Other disposition 2/8/11
173 Steine 29113/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/22/10 No No No
Kings County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 34/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 18
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
174 Steine 29111/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/28/10 No No No Answer filed on 12/28/10
Notice of Appearance filed 10/5/11Reply filed 10/13/11
175 Druckman 27774/10 LNV 11/12/10 11/23/10 No No No Notice of appearance filed on 2/16/11
176 Druckman 28664/10 WF 11/22/10 12/16/10 No No No Reply to counterclaims filed on 1/14/11
Notice of Appearance filed 7/29/11
177 Katz 29127/10 US Bank 11/29/10 12/16/10 12/6/11
Filed by P
12/6/11 No Answer filed on 1/13/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/7/12178 McGlinchey 27276/10 Aurora 11/4/10 12/8/10 5/3/11
Filed by PNo Yes Motion for Order of Reference filed
6/14/11
Cross Motions filed 7/8/11
Orders for traverse hearing filed 11/4/11 &
12/5/11Ecourts: Motion Return date 6/27/11
Ecourts: Traverse Hearing 3/15/12
179 Davidson 27554/10 Citimtg 11/8/10 11/23/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/19/11 – no
reason
180 Roach 26974/10 HSBC 11/1/10 11/30/10 12/12/11
Filed by P
12/12/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/10/12
181 Knuckles 28175/10 Citiproperty 11/16/10 12/9/10 No No No
182 Dorfman 28357/10 Deutshce
Bank
11/18/10 12/10/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/27/11 –
case settled
183 Berkman 28690/10 BofA 11/22/10 1/25/11 No No No184 Masone 28694/10 Maspeth
Federal11/22/10 12/14/10 4/11/11
Filed by PNo Yes Reply filed on 1/10/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/1/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 35/134
APPENDIX C
Queens County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 36/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 1
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
1.
Baum 27562/10 M & T 11/01/10 11/22/10 3/11/11Filed by P 03/11/11 Yes Notice of Appearance 8/24/11Answer filed by ?? 11/22/10
Ecourts reflects that a Motion to
Discontinue was filed 1/31/12 and deemedfully submitted w/out opposition 02/23/12
2. Baum
Atty Change
– GPO
12/29/11
27563/10 Wells F 11/01/10 11/12/10 6/15/11Filed by P
6/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 08/10/11Order Signed – 8/16/11 – removed from
FCP due to D default
3. Baum 27734/10 Wells F 11/03/10 11/18/10 11/30/11
Filed by P
11/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 01/18/12,
conferences ongoing
4. Baum 28075/10 CitiMtg 11/08/10 11/22/18 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/22/11 – No
Reason provided
5. Baum 28208/10 Wells F 11/09/10 12/03/10 No No No Answer filed 12/07/10
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/13/11 – loanreinstated
6. Baum 28209/10 Wells F 11/09/10 11/22/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 02/09/11 –loan mod
7. Baum
Atty Change
Berkman12/7/11
28210/10 Wells F 11/09/10 11/22/10 6/17/11
Filed by P
6/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/09/11, with
conferences ongoing to date.
8. Baum 28359/10 CitiMtg 11/10/10 12/01/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/9/11 – loanreintstated
9. Baum 28503/10 Wells F 11/12/10 11/24/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/15/11 – noreason
10. Baum 28505/10 Wells F 11/12/10 11/23/10 No No No Answer filed 12/06/10
11. Baum 28509/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/24/10 No No No
Queens County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 37/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 2
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
Atty Change –McCabe
12/4/11
12. Baum 28512/10 CitiMtg 11/12/10 11/22/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed on 10/21/11 –
loan mod
13. Baum 28640/10 Wells F 11/15/10 11/26/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed on 6/21/11 –
No Reason
14. Baum 28642/10 Wells F 11/15/10 11/24/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed on 4/25/11 –
no reason15. Baum 28643/10 CitiMtg 11/15/10 11/30/10 No No No Answer filed 12/03/10
16. Baum 28644/10 GMAC 11/15/10 12/16/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/25/11 – no
reason
17. Baum
Attny
Change –McCabe
12/2/11
28900/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/26/10 10/5/11
Filed by P
12/2/11 Yes Ecourts indicates ex parte motion for “court
directed service” with order signed 11/23/11
18. Baum
Attny
Change –Stein
12/2/11
28901/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/24/10 7/29/11
Filed by P
7/29/11 Yes Ecourts indicates 1st FSC 09/23/11, with
conferences ongoing to date.
19. Baum
Attny
Change –Fein
12/21/11
28903/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/26/10 6/21/11
Filed by P
6/21/11 Yes Answer filed 12/3/10
Notice of App filed on 8/24/11 and 9/29/11
Ecourts indicates 1st FSC 08/09/11, withconferences going on to date. H/o
represented by QVLP.
20. Baum 28905/10 PNC 11/17/10 11/26/10 1/17/11 No Yes Answer filed 12/9/10
Queens County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 38/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 3
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
Filed by P Plaintiff filed Motion to Discontine01/19/12 – fully submitted as of 02/01/12.
21. Baum 28907/10 CitiMtg 11/17/10 12/14/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/23/11 – noreason
22. Baum 29053/10 Wells F 11/18/10 12/3/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/19/11 – loanreinstated
23. Baum
Atty Change
– Fein12/1/11
29143/10 Wells F 11/19/10 12/10/10 10/18/11Filed by P
10/18/11 Yes Answer & Counterclaims filed 12/28/10Reply to Counterclaims filed 12/30/10
Notice of Appearance filed 1/27/11 and12/20/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/05/11, with
conferences ongoing to date.
24. Baum
Atty Change
– Rosicki12/5/11
29144/10 Wells F 11/19/10 12/10/10 8/24/11
Filed by P
8/24/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/12/11.
Order signed 11/9/11 – removed from FCP
due to D default
25. Baum 29264/10 Wells F 11/22/10 12/3/10 1/13/12Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 2/4/11Order to Discontinue 2/2/11 – loan mod
26. Baum 29406/10 Wells F 11/23/10 12/3/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 3/3/11 – no
reason
27. Baum 29598/10 Wells F 11/24/10 12/15/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/11/11 – no
reason
28. Baum
Atty Change
Rosicki12/6/11
29599/10 Wells F 11/24/10 12/7/10 7/11/11
Filed by P
7/11/11 Yes Answer filed 12/8/10
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 09/22/11, with
conferences ongoing to date.
29. BaumAtty
29600/10 Wells F 11/24/10 12/9/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/10/11
Queens County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 39/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 4
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
Change –GPO
12/30/11
30. Baum 29761/10 Wells F 11/29/10 12/13/10 1/20/12
Filed by P
No Yes Notices of Appearance filed 12/15/10 &
3/10/11
Discontinuance Motion filed 02/08/12,deemed fully submitted and granted
02/14/12. H/o represented by Beth P.
Schwartz, Esq. 718-254-6017.31. Baum
Atty Change – GPO
12/30/11
29759/10 Wells F 11/29/10 12/16/10 7/21/11
Filed by P
7/21/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se on 12/17/10
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/23/11, withconferences ongoing to date.
32. Baum
Atty Change
– Rosicki
1/17/12
29760/10 Wells F 11/29/10 12/10/10 11/7/11
Filed by P
11/7/11 Yes Answer filed 12/20/10
Notices of Appearance filed on 12/15/10;
12/20/10; 1/3/11; 1/10/11; 1/18/11
Reply to Counterclaims filed 1/20/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/03/12, with
conferences ongoing to date. H/o
represented by Robert Carrozzo, 516-355-0550.
33. Baum 29762/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/16/10 1/24/11
Filed by P
No Yes Notices of Appearance filed on 12/28/10
&3/25/10
Ecourts reflects that P filed Motion to
Discontinue on 01/15/12, deemed fullysubmitted 02/07/12 without opposition. H/o
represented by Beth Schwartz, Esq., 718-
254-6017.
Queens County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 40/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 5
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
34. Baum 29763/10 Citibank 11/29/10 12/10/10 No No No Answer filed 12/15/10Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 3/9/11 – no
reason
35. Baum
Atty Change
McCabe12/15/11
29764/10 M & T 11/29/10 1/3/11 04/05/11
Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 8/24/11
Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 08/08/11,
with conferences continuing to date.
36. Baum 29766/10 US Bank 11/29/10 12/23/10 8/4/11
Filed by P
8/4/11 Yes Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 09/26/11, but
h/p defaulted.Order Signed 10/5/11 – removed from FCP
due to D defaultStip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/23/11 – mtg
paid off
37. Baum
Atty Change
– McCabe
12/15/111
29767/10 Midfirst 11/29/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed on 1/7/11
LP re-filed on 2/16/11 & 3/28/11
38. Baum 29879/10 Wells F 11/30/10 2/3/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/25/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/7/11 – no
reason
39. Baum 29880/10 Wells F 11/30/10 12/13/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 2/14/11 –
no reason
40. Baum 29881/10 Wells F 11/30/10 12/16/10 No No No Answer filed 12/30/10
Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 2/25/11 –
no reason
41. Sweeney 27529/10 CitiMtg 11/01/10 11/10/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 02/22/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/6/12 – mtgreinstated
Queens County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 41/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 6
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
42. Sweeney 27542/10 CitiMtg 11/01/10 11/22/10 6/3/11Filed by P
6/3/11&
9/30/11
Yes Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC 07/22/11, but h/odefaulted
Order Signed on 9/26/11 – removed from
FCP due to D’s defaultMotion for Order of Reference 10/13/11
43. Sweeney 27706/10 CitiMtg 11/03/10 11/15/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 4/29/11 – Pfailed to provide RPAPL 1304 90 day
notice
44. Sweeney 27707/10 CitiMtg 11/03/10 12/13/10 No No No Notices of App filed 11/22/10 & 02/16/1145. Sweeney 27708/10 CitiMtg 11/03/10 11/12/10 No No No Notices of App filed 12/10/10 & 03/04/11
46. Sweeney 27873/10 CitiMtg 11/04/10 11/12/10 7/12/11
Filed by P
7/13/11 Yes Answer filed 12/08/10
Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 09/01/11 andthat case settled at the conference.
47. Sweeney 27875/10 CitiMtg 11/04/10 11/16/10 No No No
48. Sweeney 27953/10 CitiMtg 11/05/10 11/22/10 No No No
49. Sweeney 27954/10 CitiMtg 11/05/10 12/22/10 No No No
50. Sweeney 28053/10 CitiMtg 11/08/10 11/16/10 No No No51. Sweeney 28056/10 CitiMtg 11/08/10 11/30/10 04/14/11
Filed by D
No Yes Motion to Dismiss filed by h/o 4/14/11
Motion marked off-calendar 05/10/11
52. Sweeney 28342/10 CitiMtg 11/10/10 11/22/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 11/22/11
53. Sweeney 28343/10 CitiMtg 11/10/10 12/01/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed on 5/9/11 – no
reason
54. Sweeney 28436/10 CitiMtg 11/12/10 11/22/10 No No No
55.
Sweeney 28467/10 CitiMtg 11/12/10 11/17/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/4/11 – noreason
56. Sweeney 28468/10 CitiMtg 11/12/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed on 6/21/11
57. Sweeney 28794/10 CitiMtg 11/16/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed 01/11/11
58. Sweeney 28797/10 CitiMtg 11/16/10 11/29/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/23/11 – mtg
Queens County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 42/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 7
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
reinstated
59. Sweeney 28799/10 CitiMtg 11/16/10 12/01/10 No No No
60. Sweeney 29061/10 CitiMtg 11/18/10 11/29/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 2/23/11
61. Sweeney 29572/10 CitiMtg 11/24/10 12/02/10 No No No
62. Sweeney 29754/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/08/10 No No No
63. Sweeney 29780/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/10/10 No No No Answer filed 12/17/10Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/27/11 – loan
mod
64. Sweeney 29781/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/21/10 No No No Answer filed 12/21/10Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/3/11 – P
failed to provide RPAPL 1304 90 daynotice
65. Sweeney 29782/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed 12/20/10Notice of Appearance filed 03/10/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/27/11 – P
failed to provide RPAPL 1304 90 day
notice66. Sweeney 29780/10 CitiMtg 11/29/10 12/10/10 No No No Answer filed 12/17/10
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/27/11 – loan
mod
67. Sweeney 29894/10 CitiMtg 11/30/10 12/08/10 No No No Answer filed 12/23/10
68. Fein 27523/10 Deutsche 11/01/10 11/09/10 No No No
69. Fein 27680/10 Wells F 11/03/10 11/15/10 No No No Answer filed 11/29/10
70.
Fein 27725/10 RBS 11/03/10 11/19/10 12/29/10Filed by D No Yes Answer filed 11/22/10Homeowner filed RJI 12/29/10Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 04/20/11
Order Signed 7/20/11 – removed from FCP
due to failure of D to provide docs (ecourts
Queens County – November 2010
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 43/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 8
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
only indicates that a conference was heldthis date)
71. Fein 27730/10 HSBC 11/03/10 11/17/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/20/11 – noreason
72. Fein 27833/10 OneWest 11/04/10 11/12/10 6/27/11Filed by P
6/27/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 08/30/11, buth/o defaulted.
Order Signed 8/30/11 – removed from FCP
due to D default
73. Fein 27928/10 OneWest 11/05/10 11/12/10 7/6/11 7/6/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 08/23/11, buth/o defaulted.Order Signed 8/23/11 – removed from FCP
due to D default
74. Fein 28067/10 US Bank 11/08/10 12/03/10 7/25/11
Filed by P
7/25/11 Yes Notice of Appearances filed 11/22/10&
02/22/11
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/06/11, buth/o defaulted.
Order Signed 9/13/11 – removed from FCPdue to D defaultMotion for Order of Ref Filed 11/9/11
75. Fein 28196/10 HSBC 11/09/10 11/17/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue 6/3/11 – no reason
76. Fein 28337/10 HSBC 11/10/10 12/03/10 11/2/11Filed by D
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 04/06/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/11/12, with
conferences continuing. H/o represented by
Cabanillas & Assoc., 914-385-0292.
77. Fein 28341/10 Deutsche 11/10/10 11/17/10 6/27/11
Filed by P
6/27/11 Yes Answer filed 01/11/11
Reply filed on 3/7/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/10/11
Notice of Appearance filed on 12/21/11
Queens County – November 2010
#
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 44/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 9
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
H/o represented by Marrone Law Group,718-261-1711.
78. Fein 28442/10 Aurora 11/12/10 11/22/10 No No No Answer filed 12/02/10
79. Fein 28444/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/18/10 No No No
80. Fein 28630/10 OneWest 11/15/10 11/30/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 03/04/11
81. Fein 28792/10 OneWest 11/16/10 11/29/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/03/10
82. Fein 28891/10 HSBC 11/17/10 12/01/10 No No No Answer filed 12/21/10
Reply filed 12/30/10
83. Fein 28942/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/26/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/10/1184. Fein 29013/10 GMAC 11/18/10 11/30/10 04/20/11
Filed by P4/20/11 Yes Answer filed 12/10/11
Unknown which party filed RJI
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC help 07/05/11 and
that the matter was “discontinued”Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 8/30/11 – P
failed to provide RPAPL 1304 90 day
notice
85. Fein 29259/10 GMAC 11/22/10 12/01/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed on10/26/11 – P needs to comply with acondition precedent
86. Fein 29260/10 Aurora 11/22/10 12/03/10 No No No
87. Fein 29262/10 Deutsche 11/22/10 12/21/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 5/26/11
Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed on 8/22/11– no reason
88. Fein 29533/10 CitiBank 11/24/10 12/13/10 6/27/11Filed by P
6/27/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 08/11/11, buth/o defaulted.
Order Signed 8/15/11 – removed from FCP
due to D default
89. Fein 29570/10 Chase 11/24/10 12/07/10 No No No
Queens County – November 2010
Fi I d # B k D t Aff f RJI D Dl E t Oth
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 45/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 10
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
90. Fein 29750/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/06/10 No No No
91. Fein 29752/10 Chase 11/29/10 12/14/10 No No No
92. Fein 29889/10 Household 11/30/10 04/05/11 No No No
93. Fein 29890/10 Deutsche 11/30/10 01/03/11 No No No Notice of Appearance 1/6/11
Affidavit of Service 1/10/11
Answer filed 01/13/11
Notices of Appearances 3/7/11 & 3/15/11
94. McCabe 27763/10 Wells F 11/03/10 11/18/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 6/8/11 – no
reason95. McCabe 27765/10 B of A 11/03/10 11/18/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/10/10
96. McCabe 27766/10 Flagstar 11/03/10 12/02/11 02/22/11
Filed by P
2/22/11 No Motion to Amend Summons filed 2/22/11,
which was denied 3/3/11OSC to Amend Complaint filed 6/9/11,
denied 6/22/11
Ecourts does not show case as of 02/24/12
97. McCabe 27767/10 Flagstar 11/03/10 11/23/10 02/15/11
Filed by P
2/15/11 No Ecourts does not show case as of 02/24/12
98. McCabe 27857/10 Wells F 11/04/10 02/02/11 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 04/06/11 –
no reason
99. McCabe 28246/10 US Bank 11/09/10 11/18/10 9/12/11Filed by P
9/12/11 No Ecourts reflects motion filed 12/20/2011
100. McCabe 28923/10 HSBC 11/17/10 12/29/11 01/13/11Filed by D
No Yes Motion to Dismiss filed by h/o 1/13/11Motion to Dismiss withdrawn 06/15/11
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 10/03/11
Consent to Representation by Attny 5/25/11H/o represented by Alexander Hakopian,
212-868-9688
101. McCabe 28924/10 HSBC 11/17/10 11/22/10 4/29/11 4/29/11 Yes Answer filed 12/01/10
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 46/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 11
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
Filed by P Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/09/11, buth/o defaulted
Order Signed 11/22/11 – removed from
FCP due to D default
102. McCabe 28925/10 HSBC 11/17/10 12/29/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/20/11
103. McCabe 28926/10 Deutsche 11/17/10 12/02/10 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 03/29/11 – no
reason
104. McCabe 29003/10 Deutsche 11/18/10 12/02/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/29/10
105. McCabe 29064/10 Deutsche 11/18/10 12/01/10 9/23/11Filed by P
9/23/11 Yes Answer filed 02/02/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/09/11, but
h/o defaulted
Order Signed – removed from RFP due todefault – 11/22/11
106. McCabe 29254/10 B of A 11/22/10 12/01/10 No No No Answer filed 12/02/10
107. McCabe 29255/10 Deutsche 11/22/10 12/14/10 1/19/12Filed by P
1/19/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/22/12, withconferences continuing
(Judge Grays – Queens Pilot Project)108. McCabe 29276/10 Flagstar 11/22/10 3/29/11 02/15/11
Filed by P
8/18/11 Yes Answer filed 02/02/10
Bank filed amended complaint 03/09/11
Bank filed affs of service by 03/29/11Amended Answer filed 04/05/11
Ecourts does not reflect that any FSC has
been scheduled or held
109. McCabe 29277/10 HSBC 11/22/10 12/06/10 No No No
110. McCabe 29446/10 US Bank 11/23/10 12/07/10 5/16/11
Filed by D
No Yes Answer filed 01/06/11
Motion to Dismiss filed on 5/24/11
Notice of Appearance filed on 7/6/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/13/11, with
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 47/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 12
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
conferences continuing to date (and interesttolled since 01/19/12)
H/o atty is George Beer, 718-523-3413
111. McCabe 29748/10 Deutsche 11/29/10 04/21/11 No No No
112. McCabe 29807/10 Deutsche 11/29/10 12/21/10 10/5/11Filed by P
10/5/11 Yes Answer filed 01/11/11NOAs filed 03/10/11 & 11/28/11
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/17/11, with
conferences continuing to date.
H/o atty is Donald Salfarlie, 718-291-7433113. Dorf 28138/10 HSBC 11/08/10 12/01/10 No No No Answer filed 12/06/11
Notice of Appearance filed 03/04/11
114. Dorf 28490/10 HSBC 11/12/10 12/17/10 No No No
115. Dorf 28491/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/30/10 No No No
116. Dorf 28662/10 Deutsche 11/15/10 12/16/10 No No No
117. Dorf 28665/10 HSBC 11/15/10 11/24/10 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 03/15/11 – mtg
reinstated
118. Dorf 28669/10 B of A 11/15/10 12/03/10 7/14/11Filed by P
7/14/11 Yes Answer filed 12/09/10Ecourts reflects 1
stFSC held 09/01/11, but
h/o defaulted.Order Signed – 9/8/11 - removed from FCP
due to D default
BUT, ecourts reflects that another FSC held11/07/11
Order Signed 11/16/11 (purpose unknown)
119. Dorf 29167/10 Deutsche 11/19/10 12/17/10 8/26/11
Filed by P
8/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/21/11, but
h/o defaulted.
Order Signed – 11/9/11 – removed fromFCP due to D default
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 48/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 13
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
120. Dorf 29170/10 Deutsche 11/19/10 12/01/10 7/28/11Filed by P
7/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects that 1st
FSC held 09/08/11,but the h/o defaulted.
Order Signed – 9/14/11 – case removed
from FSC part
121. Dorf 29173/10 Deutsche 11/19/10 12/20/10 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 02/01/11 –
compromised & settled
122. Dorf 29175/10 Deutsche 11/19/10 12/06/10 9/13/11
Filed by P
12/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects that 1st
FSC held 10/29/11,
but h/o defaulted
Order Signed 11/09/11- removed from FCPAffirmation of RPAPL 1304 Notice filed
12/15/11
123. Dorf 29179/10 HSBC 11/19/10 12/07/10 No No No
124. Dorf 29407/10 HSBC 11/23/10 12/10/10 8/3/11
Filed by P
8/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects that 1st FSC held 09/12/11,
but h/o defaulted
Order Signed 9/13/11- removed from FCPOrder of reference filed 12/20/11
125. Dorf 29409/10 HSBC 11/23/10 12/10/10 3/7/11Filed by D
No Yes Answer filed 01/07/11Ecourts reflects Mtn to Dismiss filed 3/7/11
Affirmation in Opp filed 10/26/11
Order on Traverse (service sustained)1/3/11
126. Dorf 29410/10 HSBC 11/23/10 12/20/10 7/8/11
Filed by P
7/8/11 Yes Answer filed 12/20/10
Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/23/11 and a
trial modification in place 02/23/12, with
FSC control dates continuingH/o atty J.G. Thomas & Ass 718-578-0019
127. Dorf 29411/10 US Bank 11/23/10 12/10/10 No No No
128. Dorf 29412/10 Deutsche 11/23/10 12/08/10 No No No
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 49/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 14
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
129. Dorf 29574/10 US Bank 11/24/10 12/17/10 No No No
130. Dorf 29900/10 HSBC 11/30/10 12/08/10 9/27/11
Filed by P
9/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/15/11, with
conferences ongoing
131. Dorf 29902/10 HSBC 11/30/10 01/06/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/10/11
132. Shapiro 28451/10 US Bank 11/12/10 11/24/10 9/28/11
Filed by P
9/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held on 11/17/11,
but h/o defaultedOrder signed 11/25/11 – removed from FCP
133. Shapiro 28471/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 01/11/11 9/26/11
Filed by P
9/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held on 11/07/11,
but h/o defaultedOrder signed 11/16/11 – removed from FCP
H/o atty is Dorothy Atchison 718-262-8032
134. Shapiro 28472/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 12/15/10 6/14/11
Filed by P
6/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held on 07/29/11,
but h/o defaultedOrder signed 8/11/11 – removed from FCP
Order of Reference filed – 10/26/11 (refiled
Due Dlg Aff)
135. Shapiro 28473/10 HSBC 11/12/10 11/22/10 03/09/11Filed by P
3/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held on 05/05/11,but h/o defaultedOrder signed 5/17/11 – removed from FCP
Order of Reference filed 9/21/11
Judgment of Foreclosure & Sale filed 2/7/12
136. Shapiro 28475/10 HSBC 11/12/10 No No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 02/21/10 – no
reason
137. Shapiro 28477/10 US Bank 11/12/10 01/06/11 12/19/11
Filed by P
12/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/08/12, with
conferences ongoing
138. Shapiro 28889/10 US Bank 11/17/10 01/13/11 10/13/11
Filed by P
10/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/28/11, with
conferences ongoing
139. Shapiro 28890/10 US Bank 11/17/10 11/30/10 No No No Reply filed 12/22/10
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 50/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 15
Filed ServiceJ g
Aff Record
Notice of Appearance filed 01/10/11Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 10/24/11 –
no reason
140. Shapiro 29007/10 US Bank 11/18/10 01/13/11 12/22/11
Filed by P
12/22/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/01/12, with
conferences ongoing
141. Shapiro 29028/10 Fannie
Mae
11/18/10 01/07/11 6/24/11
Filed by P
6/24/11 yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/10/11, but
h/o defaulted
Order Signed 8/16/11 – removed from FCP
Order to Appoint Referee Signed 02/21/12142. Shapiro 29129/10 US Bank 11/19/10 01/07/11 9/27/11Filed by P
9/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/17/11, withconferences ongoing
143. Shapiro 29130/10 US Bank 11/19/10 1/6/11 No No No Answer filed 12/14/10Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 8/22/11 –
no reason
Stip of Discontinuance filed 10/31/11 – noreason
144. Shapiro 29180/10 FannieMae
11/19/10 02/16/11 No No No Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 1/23/11 –no reason
145. Shapiro 29390/10 Deutsche 11/23/10 01/06/11 No No No
146. Shapiro 29443/10 PHH Mtg 11/23/10 01/07/11 No No No “Reply” filed 02/04/11Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 11/10/11 –
no reason
147. Shapiro 29444/10 Fannie
Mae
11/23/10 12/09/10 5/10/11
Filed by P
5/10/11 Yes Answer filed 12/23/10
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 06/29/11, and
the case marked “settled-loan modified”Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 8/15/11
H/o atty – Ades & Assoc 516-487-1010
148. Shapiro 29560/10 Fannie 11/24/10 01/07/11 6/2/11 6/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/21/11, but
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 51/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 16
Filed Serviceg
Aff Record
Mae Filed by P not eligible for FSC b/c not owner-occupied
Order Signed – 7/28/11 removed from FCPOrder of Reference – 11/28/11
Judgment of F/C and Sale – 02/22/11
149. Shapiro 29562/10 HSBC 11/24/10 01/13/11 No No No Answer filed 02/04/11
Stip/Aff of Discontinuance filed 6/27/11 –no reason given
150. Shapiro 29565/10 HSBC 11/24/10 01/07/11 No No No
151. Shapiro 29566/10 BNY 11/24/10 01/06/11 8/9/11Filed by P 8/9/11 Yes Answer filed 02/10/11Answer (verified) filed 03/03/11Verified Reply filed 03/29/11
Ecourts reflects1st FSC held 09/23/11, with
conferences ongoingNotice of Appearance 12/27/11
H/o atty Dwyer & Assoc 212-203-4965
152. Shapiro 29568/10 US Bank 11/24/10 01/06/11 No No No
153. Shapiro 29687/10 Chase 11/26/10 1/20/11 No No No Answer filed 12/13/10154. Shapiro 29688/10 HSBC 11/26/10 01/07/11 12/15/11
Filed by P12/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1
stFSC held 02/08/12, with
conferences ongoing
155. Shapiro 29891/10 PHH Mtg 11/30/10 No No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 12/21/10 – noreason
156. Shapiro 29905/10 US Bank 11/30/10 01/07/11 04/11/11Filed by P
4/11/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 05/31/11, buth/o did not appear at 2d FSC on 07/19/11
Order Signed 7/20/11 – removed from FCP
157. Stein 27704/10 OneWest 11/03/10 11/10/10 8/5/11
Filed by P
8/5/11 Yes Answer filed 11/17/10
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/22/11, 2d
FSC held 10/20/11, but h/o defaulted for 3dFSC on 12/12/11
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI Due Dlg Ecourts Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 52/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 17
Filed Service Aff Record
Request for Adjournment filed 12/9/11Order Signed 12/21/11 – removed from
FCP due to D default
158. Stein 27705/10 Chase 11/03/10 11/17/10 No No No Notices of App filed 11/18/10 & 11/22/10
159. Stein 27876/10 OneWest 11/04/10 11/17/10 7/6/11Filed by P
7/6/11 Yes Answer filed 12/13/10Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/22/11, with
conferences ongoing
Notice of Appearance filed 12/21/11
H/o atty Elliot Schlissel 516-561-6645160. Stein 28220/10 US Bank 11/09/10 11/17/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 02/28/11Stip of Discontinuance filed 5/5/11 – settled
161. Stein 28465/10 US Bank 11/12/10 11/18/10 10/18/11
Filed by P
10/18/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/05/12, with
conferences ongoing
Notice of Appearance filed 03/04/11
162. Stein 29753/10 CitiCorp 11/29/10 12/07/10 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 3/7/11 – no
reason
163. Frenkel 27525/10 Bank of NY
11/01/10 11/17/10 No No No Answer filed 12/06/10
164. Frenkel 28185/10 Wells F 11/09/10 11/26/10 No No No
165. Frenkel 28198/10 Deutsche 11/09/10 12/21/10 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 1/6/12 9 – no
reason
166. Frenkel 28770/10 B of A 11/16/10 11/23/10 No No No
167. Frenkel 28894/10 JP Morgan 11/17/10 01/12/11 7/29/11
Filed by P
7/29/11 No Ecourts should but does not reflect this case
– may be mistranscribed index number
Order Signed – 9/14/11 – removed fromFCP due to D default
168. Frenkel 29686/10 Deutsche 11/26/10 01/12/11 No No No Supplemental Summons & Complaint filed
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank Datei
Aff of S i
RJI Due DlgAff
Ecourts Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 53/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 18
Filed Service Aff Record
1/20/11
169. Rosicki 27503/10 Bank
United
11/01/10 11/17/10 12/21/10
Filed by P
12/21/10 Yes Answer filed 11/23/10
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 04/19/11, buth/o defaulted
Order Signed 4/27/11 – removed from FCP
Order of Reference – 9/27/11
170. Rosicki 28203/10 Flagstar 11/09/10 11/22/10 12/14/10
Filed by P
12/14/10 Yes Answer filed 11/23/10
Notice of Appearance filed 3/24/11
Ecourts reflects 1
st
FSC 04/19/11, with07/19/11 FSC reflecting a trial modification
and a 12/01/11 FSC reflecting a permanent
modification
171. Rosicki 28941/10 CitiMtg 11/17/10 12/14/10 No No No
172. Rosicki 29058/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/01/01 No No No
173. Rosicki 29445/10 MetLife 11/23/10 12/07/10 No No No Aff/Stip of Discontinuance filed 01/21/11 –
no reason
Notice of Appearance filed 03/10/11174. Rosicki 29847/10 DLJ Mtg 11/30/10 12/08/10 01/05/11
Filed by P1/5/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1
stFSC 04/22/11, and a
subsequent 05/20/11 FSC, but h/o defaulted
for the 08/12/11 FSC
Order Signed 8/15/11 – removed from FCP
Order of Reference filed 2/1/12
175. Rosicki 29848/10 11/30/10 12/28/10 01/13/11 01/13/11Filed by P
1/13/11 Yes Answer filed 03/21/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 04/22/11, with
conferences ongoing
176. Katz 27528/10 US Bank 11/01/10 11/10/10 11/30/11
Filed by P
11/30/11 Yes Answer filed 11/19/10
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 01/18/12,
Order Signed 1/23/12 – removed from FCP
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank DateFil d
Aff of S i
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsR d
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 54/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 19
Filed Service Aff Record
because no mod offered
Notice of Appearance filed 1/25/12Motion to Dismiss filed by h/o 02/22/12
177. Katz –
Atty Change
– Hasbrew
12/20/11
28488/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 12/03/10 11/1/11
Filed by P
10/31/11 Yes Answer filed 12/22/10
Reply filed 12/29/10
Notice to Produce filed 1/4/11
Reply filed 3/9/11Stipulation filed 4/1/11
Ecourts reflects 1
st
FSC 12/19/11, withconferences ongoingh/o represented by Luis Echeeverria 718-
476-2700
178. Katz 29010/10 US Bank 11/18/10 12/02/10 10/19/11
Filed by P
10/19/11 Yes Answer filed 12/20/10
Notice of Appearance
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 12/07/11, withconferences ongoing
179. Katz 29359/10 Deutsche 11/23/10 12/23/10 No No No180. Druckman 28892/10 Wells F 11/17/10 11/30/10 No No No Answer filed 12/15/10
181. Druckman 28893/10 Wells F 11/17/10 No No No No
182. Druckman 29006/10 Wells F 11/18/10 11/30/10 No No No Answer filed 12/06/10Notice of Appearance filed 01/05/11
183. Druckman 29126/10 Wells F 11/19/10 03/01/11 No No No
184. Druckman 29257/10 Wells F 11/22/10 12/06/10 No No No Answer filed 12/07/10
185. Druckman
Atty Change 29392/10 Wells F 11/23/10 12/21/10 No No No Reply to Counterclaims filed 7/7/11
Answer filed 7/12/11
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 55/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 20
Filed Service Aff Record
– Duoba
Law
186. Druckman 29571/10 BNY 11/24/10 12/13/10 No No No Answer filed 12/16/10
187. Pincus 27832/10 HSBC 11/05/10 11/10/10 11/22/11
Filed by P
11/22/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 01/13/12, with
conferences ongoing
188. Gess 27890/10 RBS 11/04/10 12/10/10 No No No
189. Berkman 28148/10 HSBC 11/08/10 12/17/10 No No No Aff/Stip of Discontinuance filed 01/11/11 –no reason
Notice of Appearance filed 02/22/11
190. Berkman 28830/10 BAC 11/16/10 11/23/10 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 03/04/11
191. Berkman 29530/10 BAC 11/24/10 12/10/10 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 12/16/10,
12/28/10 and 03/10/11
192. Delbello 28402/10 Wells F 11/12/10 No No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 5/31/11 – no
reason
193. Weinreb 28489/10 Deutsche 11/12/10 12/08/10 7/15/11Filed by P
7/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/01/11, buth/o defaulted
Order Signed 9/8/11 – remove from FCPJudge’s Memo on Oder of Ref filed 11/1/11
Judge’s Memo on Order of ref with changed
caption filed 1/26/12Ecourts reflects Court denied both motions– robosigning funny business?
194. Weinreb 28807/10 US Bank 11/16/10 12/06/10 7/21/11
Filed by P
7/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/20/11, but
h/o defaulted
Order Signed 9/26/11 – removed from FCP
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 56/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 21
Filed Service Aff Record
Order of Reference 11/7/11
195. Weinreb 28809/10 Deutsche 11/16/10 12/01/10 No 7/13/11 No No RJI = not in ecourts, even though DDAfiled
196. Weinreb 29166/10 Wells F 11/19/10 12/10/10 7/7/11
Filed by P
6/7/11 Yes Bank moved for Order of Ref 07/12/11
Order of Ref granted 07/20/11Why no FSC??
197. Weinreb 29575/10 Deutsche 11/24/10 12/22/10 No 8/4/11 No No RJI = not in ecourts, even though DDAfiled
198. Davidson 28895/10 US Bank 11/17/10 11/30/10 03/15/11Filed by P 3/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1
st
FSC held 05/04/11, buth/o defaulted
Order Signed 5/17/11 – Removed from FCPOrder of Ref Signed 5/24/11
Entry of Order filed 6/13/11
199. Davidson 29268/10 US Bank 11/22/10 12/02/10 No No No Stipulation to Discontinue filed 01/05/11 –
no reason
200. Roach 28938/10 Deutsche 11/17/10 11/30/10 7/26/11
Filed by P
7/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/06/11, but
h/o defaultedOrder Signed 9/13/11 – removed from FCP
Mtn to Extend Time to Answer – filed11/03/11 and signed 11/07/11
Motion (for what?) filed 10/14/11
Copy of Order filed 12/28/11Ecourts reflects FSC restored and
conference held 01/31/12
Order (for what?) Signed 2/1/12H/o atty – QVLP (Jose A. Polanco)
201. Stein 29573/10 US Bank 11/24/10 12/08/10 No No No Stipulation to Discontinue filed 03/07/11 –mtg reinstated
Queens County – November 2010
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 57/134
Last reviewed April 17, 2012 22
Filed Service Aff Record
202. Stein 29136/10 US Bank 11/19/10 12/07/10 No No No Answer filed 12/17/10
203. Solferino 29393/10 US Bank 11/23/10 12/06/10 No No No Answer filed 12/13/10
204. Sankel 29666/10 HSBC 11/26/10 12/15/10 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 5/18/11 – mtg
paid off
205. Sheldon 29799/10 US Bank 11/29/10 12/17/10 01/13/11
Filed by P
1/13/11 Yes Answer filed 12/21/10
Notice of Substitution filed 4/7/11
Answer filed 04/12/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 04/19/11, but
h/o defaultedOrder Signed 4/27/11 – removed from FCP
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 58/134
APPENDIX D
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date Aff of RJI DD Aff Ecourt Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 59/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 1
Filed Service Record
1. Baum 4687/11 Wells F 3/1/11 3/25/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/27/11 – mtgmodified
2. Baum 4915/11 Bank of NY 3/3/11 4/4/11 No No No
3. Baum 5044/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/14/11 No No No
4. Baum 5245/11 Wells F 3/8/11 3/17/11 No No No
5. Baum –
Atty Change
GPO
12/27/11
5246/11 Wells F 3/8/11 3/21/11 8/22/11Filed by P
8/22/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/26/11
6. Baum –
Atty Change
Shapiro
12/22/11
5244/11 Wells F 3/8/11 3/17/11 10/19/11
Filed by P
10/19/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/17/12
7. Baum –
Atty Change
Fein1/26/12
5435/11 Metlife 3/9/11 3/18/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/1/11
8. Baum 5548/11 Wells F 3/10/11 3/25/11 05/23/11
Filed by P
No Yes Motion coverpage filed 5/23/11
Affidavit of Service filed 7/22/11
Order discontinuing action filed 7/25/11 – mtg
reinstatedEcourts: No FCP Conference
9. Baum –
Atty ChangeRosicki
12/19/11
5791/11 Wells F 3/14/11 3/25/11 No No No
10. Baum 5760/11 Wells F 3/14/11 3/24/11 5/5/11Filed by D
No Yes Motion coverpage filed 5/9/11Affidavit of service filed 5/13/11
Order filed 7/22/11
Motion to discontinue action filed 12/22/11 –
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Fil d
Aff of
S i
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
R d
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 60/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 2
Filed Service Record
no reasonAmended Affidavit of Service filed 1/9/12Ecourts: No FCP Conference
11. Baum –
Atty Change
Katz
12/30/11
5768/11 Wells F 3/14/11 3/23/11Amd’ed:
7/6/11
12/9/11Filed by P
No Yes Answer filed 7/15/11Consent to Change attorney (Hinshaw) filed
7/27/11
Reply filed 8/2/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/20/12
12. Baum 5907/11 Aurora 3/15/11 3/25/11 No No Yes Answer filed on 3/30/11Ecourts: Motion to Discontinue filed 4/9/12 -
no reason
13. Baum –
Atty Change
Fein12/22/11
5981/11 US Bank 3/16/11 3/23/11 8/30/11
Filed by P
8/30/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 8/30/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/15/11 (D
defaulted 1/18/12)
14. Baum 5982/11 Everhome 3/16/11 4/15/11 6/7/11Filed by P
6/7/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11Amended Aff of Service filed 5/16/11 &
5/27/11
Directive filed 8/11/11 – mtg reinstatedMotion to discontinue coverpage filed 8/17/11 -
mtg reinstated
Decision and order filed 10/13/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/12/11
15. Baum 6098/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/29/11 No No No Ecourts file and Clerk Minutes file do notcorrespond (clerk minutes show f/c action;
ecourts shows non-f/c action)
16. Baum –
Atty Change
Davidson F1/19/11
6191/11 Citimtg 3/18/11 3/30/11 4/22/11
Filed by P
4/22/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 6/7/11
Rejection of Answer filed 6/9/11
Affidavit of Service filed 6/23/11Answer filed 6/23/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Fil d
Aff of
S i
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
R d
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 61/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 3
Filed Service Record
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/2/1117. Baum –
Atty Change
GPO12/27/2011
7224/11 BofA 3/30/11 4/11/11 6/15/11
Filed by P
6/15/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/21/11
18. Baum –
Atty Change
Zeichner
11/21/11
6366/11 GMAC 3/21/11 4/11/11 6/10/11Filed by P
6/10/11 Yes Answer filed 4/1/11Reply filed 4/27/11
Discovery demands filed 5/13/11
Referee’s directive filed 12/16/11- removedfrom FCP – no reason
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/20/11
19. Baum –
Atty Change
Fein12/7/11
6324/11 Wells F 3/21/11 3/30/11 6/22/11
Filed by P
6/22/11 Yes Ltr filed 11/14/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/27/11
20. Baum –
Atty Change
GPO
12/27/11
6703/11 Wells F 3/24/11 8/17/11 9/30/11Filed by P
No Yes Notices of Appearance filed 5/19/11 & 8/18/11Notice of Pendency refiled 8/25/11
Motion for service by publication filed 10/7/11
Order for publication service filed 12/1/11Ecourts: No FCP Conference
21. Baum 6701/11 Wells F 3/24/11 4/7/11 1/20/12Filed by P
No Yes Motion filed 1/20/12Order discontinuing action filed 2/10/12 – mtg
modified
Ecourts: No FCP ConferenceBaum –
Atty Change
Frenkel
1/24/12
6835/11 OneWest 3/25/11 NONE No No No
22. Baum –
Atty Change
6976/11 Wells F 3/28/11 4/20/11 7/18/11
Filed by P
7/18/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 9/15/11
Motion coverpage filed 9/27/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 62/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 4
Filed Service Record
Rosicki12/14/11
Referee’s directive filed 11/4/11Consent to Change D’s Attorney filed 1/3/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/11/11
23. Baum –
Atty Change
McCabe
7130/11 US Bank 3/29/11 4/7/11 6/7/11Filed by P
6/7/11 Yes Referee’s directive filed 12/1/11 – removedfrom FCP at D’s request
Ecourts: First FCP Conference7/12/11
24. Baum –
Atty Change
McCabe12/22/11
7184/11 Wells F 3/30/11 4/12/11 8/12/11
Filed by P
8/12/11
&
10/4/11
Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/20/11
Reply filed 6/2/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/5/11
25. Baum –
Atty Change
GPO
12/27/11
7186/11 HSBC 3/30/11 4/12/11 7/18/11Filed by P
7/18/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/11/11
26. Baum –
Atty Change Shapiro
12/22/11
7344/11 Wells F 3/31/11 4/21/11 8/30/11
Filed by P
8/30/11 Yes Answer filed 5/6/11
Affidavit of Service filed 6/1/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/15/11
27. Baum 7295/11 HSBC 3/31/11 4/11/11 7/1/11
Filed by P
7/1/11 Yes Motion coverpage filed 12/19/11
Ecourts: No FCP Conference
28. Baum –
Atty Change
Leopold
11/25/11
7297/11 Wells F 3/31/11 6/10/11 8/22/11
Filed by P
8/22/11 Yes Suppl. S&C filed 5/11/11
Notice of Pendency filed 5/11/11Notice of Appearance filed 5/20/11
Answer filed 7/18/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/6/11
29. Baum –
Atty Change
McCabe
12/7/11
7294/11 Wells F 3/31/11 4/11/11 8/15/11
Filed by P
8/15/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/5/11
30. Fein 4731/11 BofA 3/1/11 3/22/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/4/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 63/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 5
Filed Service Record
31. Fein 4727/11 BofA 3/1/11 3/9/11 No No No Reply filed on 3/28/1132. Fein 4729/11 Chase 3/1/11 3/7/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/5/11
33. Fein 4725/11 Chase 3/1/11 3/7/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 2/9/12 – loss
mitigation
34. Fein 4730/11 WM Spl 3/1/11 3/21/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 3/16/11
35. Fein –
Atty Change
McCabe
1/19/12
4726/11 PNC 3/1/11 3/28/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/12/11Reply filed 4/20/11
Notice of Appearance filed 5/9/11
36. Fein 4827/11 Chase 3/2/11 3/15/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 6/24/11 – mtg paid
off
37. Fein 4953/11 Deutsche 3/3/11 3/21/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 11/23/11 – mtgmodified
38. Fein 4955/11 Deutsche 3/3/11 3/18/11 11/7/11Filed by P
11/7/11 Yes Answer filed on 3/22/11Amended Answer filed on 4/11/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/28/1239. Fein 5062/11 US Bank 3/4/11 3/17/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/30/11
40. Fein 5074/11 Chase 3/4/11 3/14/11 6/10/11Filed by D
No Yes Answer filed on 3/22/11Motion filed by D on 6/10/11
Motion to Cancel Lis Pendes filed by P on
1/18/12 – unable to know why (coverpage filed)Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/6/11
41. Fein 5061/11 Chase 3/4/11 3/14/11 No No No
42. Fein 5172/11 BofA 3/7/11 3/21/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/31/11Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 1/13/12 – mtg
reinstated
43. Fein 5204/11 HSBC 3/7/11 3/14/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/7/11
Reply filed on 4/14/11
44. Fein 5205/11 Onewest 3/7/11 3/21/11 10/4/11
Filed by P
10/4/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 3/24/11
Answer filed 5/18/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 64/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 6
Filed Service Record
Rejection of Answer filed 7/7/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/17/12
45. Fein 5292/11 Chase 3/8/11 3/21/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/30/11
46. Fein 5305/11 PNC 3/8/11 4/15/11 No No No Answer filed 1/10/12
47. Fein 5304/11 PNC 3/8/11 3/31/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 4/13/11
Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 11/23/11 &
12/17/11 – mtg sold to another entity
48. Fein 5541/11 Chase 3/10/11 3/21/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 7/15/11 –
discreprency relating to service49. Fein 5696/11 Chase 3/11/11 3/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 4/12/11
50. Fein 5799/11 BofA 3/14/11 3/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/27/11
51. Fein 5905/11 Chase 3/15/11 3/29/11 No No No
52. Fein 6011/11 Chase 3/16/11 3/28/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/1/11
Verified Answer filed on 4/11/11
Reply filed on 4/12/11
53.
Fein 6113/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/31/11 No No No54. Fein 6264/11 Chase 3/18/11 3/28/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 7/18/11 – mtg
reinstated
55. Fein 6299/11 BofA 3/18/11 3/31/11 No No No Answer filed 5/13/11
56. Fein 6504/11 Saxon 3/22/11 3/31/11 No No No
57. Fein 6487/11 Chase 3/22/11 4/1/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 4/27/11 & 6/9/11Reply filed 5/9/11
Amended reply filed 6/23/11
58. Fein 6829/11 Chase 3/25/11 4/4/11 No No No59. Fein 7134/11 Chase 3/29/11 4/11/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/15/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11
60. Fein 7132/11 BofA 3/29/11 4/15/11 No No No Answer filed 5/20/11
61. Fein 7271/11 Chase 3/30/11 4/20/11 No No No Answer with counterclaims filed on 4/11/11
62. Fein 7270/11 Chase 3/30/11 4/11/11 No No No
63. Fein 7269/11 PNC 3/30/11 4/19/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 7/15/11 – no
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 65/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 7
S
reason64. Fein 7378/11 Chase 3/31/11 4/6/11 No No No
65. Rosicki 4746/11 Chase 3/1/11 3/10/11 No No No Verified answer filed on 3/24/11
Reply to Counterclaim and afft of serivce
4/8/11
66. Rosicki 4882/11 Flagstar
Bank FSB
3/2/11 3/11/11 3/25/11
Filed by P
3/25/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/16/11
67. Rosicki 4883/11 Nationstar
Mortgage
3/2/11 3/22/11 7/5/11
Filed by P
7/5/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/4/11
68. Rosicki 4975/11 US Bank 3/3/11 3/18/11 No No No
69. Rosicki 4977/11 Chase 3/3/11 3/14/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/5/11
70. Rosicki 4976/11 Fifth Third 3/3/11 3/14/11 No No No
71. Rosicki 5114/11 Bayview 3/4/11 3/16/11 9/20/11
Filed by P
9/20/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 1/23/12
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/26/11
72.
Rosicki 5111/11 Bankunited 3/4/11 3/14/11 4/14/11Filed by P No Yes Motion Coverpage Fee 4/14/11Decision and order filed 8/8/11
Ecourts: No FCP Conference
73. Rosicki 5212/11 Freedom 3/7/11 3/23/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 5/24/11 – no
reason
74. Rosicki 5214/11 BofNY 3/7/11 3/18/11 11/28/11Filed by P
11/28/11 Yes Answer filed on 3/29/11Reply to counterclaim 4/14/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/21/12
75. Rosicki 5394/11 KondaurCapital
3/8/11 4/6/11 7/27/11Filed by P
7/27/11 Yes Reply filed 4/20/11Answer filed 5/4/11
Notice of Appearance filed 9/15/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference8/18/11
76. Rosicki 5393/11 Mariner 3/8/11 3/17/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11
77. Rosicki 5693/11 Chase 3/11/11 3/29/11 No No No Answer filed 5/10/11
78. Rosicki 5694/11 Chase 3/11/11 3/29/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/29/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 66/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 8
79. Rosicki 5695/11 Chase 3/11/11 3/29/11 No No No80. Rosicki 5808/11 PNC Bank 3/14/11 3/28/11 8/8/11
Filed by P
8/8/11 Yes Affirmation filed 10/31/11
Consent to Change Attorney for D filed 1/23/12
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/25/11
81. Rosicki 5809/11 Chase
HomeFinance
3/14/11 3/30/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/6/11
82. Rosicki 5807/11 Chase 3/14/11 3/28/11 No No No
83. Rosicki 6030/11 Chase 3/16/11 4/21/11 No No No Ltr filed 5/3/1184. Rosicki 6028/11 Bayview 3/16/11 3/30/11 No No No
85. Rosicki 6031/11 Chase 3/16/11 3/28/11 No No No Answer Filed 4/20/11
86. Rosicki 6285/11 US Nationl 3/18/11 3/28/11 No No No
87. Rosicki 6284/11 US Nationl 3/18/11 3/31/11 7/6/11
Filed by P
7/6/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 8/11/11
Aff of Service filed 10/19/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/4/11
88.
Rosicki 6274/11 Chase 3/18/11 4/11/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/26/1189. Rosicki 6609/11 Chase
Home
Finance
3/23/11 3/31/11 No No No Answer filed 4/6/11
Replies to Counterclaim 4/19/11 & 4/29/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/29/11
90. Rosicki 6610/11 Chase 3/23/11 4/19/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/20/11
91. Rosicki 6608/11 Gmac 3/23/11 4/12/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 8/5/11 – no reason
92. Rosicki 6831/11 JPMC 3/15/11 4/7/11 No No No Notices of Appearances field 5/5/11 & 5/20/11
93. Rosicki 6858/11 Chase 3/25/11 4/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11
94. Rosicki 6857/11 Chase 3/25/11 4/5/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/20/1195. Rosicki 7109/11 US Bank 3/29/11 4/8/11 4/19/11
Filed by P
4/19/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/2/11
96. Rosicki 7108/11 Chase 3/29/11 4/14/11 No No No Reply filed 5/2/11
Answer filed 5/10/11
97. Rosicki 7245/11 Citibank 3/30/11 4/28/11 No No No Answer filed 4/25/11 & 4/28/11
Reply filed 7/5/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 67/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 9
Notice of Appearance filed 7/21/1198. Rosicki 7405/11 Chase 3/31/11 4/19/11 No No No
99. Rosicki 7404/11 LPP Mortg 3/31/11 4/19/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 10/18/11
100. Rosicki 7403/11 BankUnited 3/31/11 4/13/11 6/6/11Filed by P
6/6/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/13/11
101. Rosicki 7401/11 Mellon 3/31/11 4/13/11 No No No Answer filed 7/19/11Notice of Return filed 8/2/11
Consent to Change Attorney filed 1/18/12 – D’s
attorney102. Shapiro 4826/11 US National 3/2/11 3/16/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/12/11
Reply filed 5/3/11
103. Shapiro 4871/11 Everbank 3/2/11 3/21/11 4/26/11Filed by P
4/26/11&
5/11/11
Yes Answer filed 3/23/11Notice of Appearance filed 6/13/11
Motion coverpage filed 7/26/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/6/11
104. Shapiro 4957/11 US National 3/3/11 3/21/11 2/15/12Filed by P No Yes Motion coverpage filed 2/15/12 for order forexpedient service
Ecourts: No FCP Conference
105. Shapiro 5180/11 Wells Fargo 3/7/11 3/23/11 8/1/11Filed by P
8/1/11 Yes Motion coverpage filed 9/2/11 for order of ref Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/22/11
106. Shapiro –
Atty Change
Schuyler
Kraus
5546/11 Wells Fargo 3/10/11 3/25/11 No No No Answer and Counterclaim filed on 3/29/11Reply filed 4/27/2011
107. Shapiro 5669/11 Merrill Lyn 3/11/11 3/24/11 No No No
108. Shapiro 5670/11 Deutsche B 3/11/11 3/31/11 6/6/11
Filed by P
No Yes RJI filed on 6/6/11 by D
Motion for Order of Ref Filed 12/6/2011
Referee’s Directive filed 12/16/2011 – removedfrom FCP due to insufficient income
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/12/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 68/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 10
109. Shapiro 5667/11 Deutsche B 3/11/11 3/22/11 No No No Amended Aff of Service filed on 3/25/11Notice of Appearance 4/13/11
110. Shapiro 5800/11 Chase 3/14/11 3/28/11 No No No Answer and Counterclaim filed on 4/6/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11Reply filed 5/20/11
Notice of Co-Counsel (Bomchpnsky) filed
5/20/11
111. Shapiro 5797/11 Chase
Home Fin
3/14/11 3/21/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 6/2/11 – no reason
112. Shapiro 5798/11 Chase
Home Fin
3/14/11 3/23/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/18/11
113. Shapiro 5908/11 Chase 3/15/11 4/1/11 No No No
114. Shapiro 5904/11 Chase 3/15/11 3/24/11 2/15/12
Filed by P
No Yes Amended Aff of Service filed on 3/30/11
Motion coverpage filed by P 2/16/12 – can’t tellwhat it is
Ecourts: Motion return date 3/9/12 - motion to
discontinue - no reason; No FCP Conference
115. Shapiro 6006/11 Chase 3/16/11 4/6/11 6/10/11
Filed by P
6/10/11 Yes Amended Aff of Service filed on 4/6/11 &
5/25/11Motion coverpage filed by P 8/31/11 – order of
reference
Motion coverpage filed by P 2/16/12 – can’t tellwhat it is
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/20/11116. Shapiro 6016/11 Chase 3/16/11 5/12/11 12/27/11
Filed by P
No Yes Motion/Stip to Discontinue filed 12/27/11 – no
reason
Ecourts: Motion return 12/27/11
117. Shapiro 6263/11 Chase
Home Fin
3/18/11 3/25/11 No No No Motion/Stip to Discontinue filed on 12/13/11 –
no reason
118. Shapiro 6300/11 Deutsche B 3/18/11 4/1/11 No No No
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 69/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 11
119. Shapiro 6298/11 HSBC 3/18/11 4/6/11 No No No Answer filed 4/18/11120. Shapiro 6388/11 Chase 3/21/11 4/1/11 No No No
121. Shapiro 6503/11 HSBC 3/22/11 4/1/11 No No No
122. Shapiro 6492/11 Chase 3/22/11 4/4/11 No No No
123. Shapiro 6488/11 Chase
Home Fin
3/22/11 3/31/11 No No No
124. Shapiro 6588/11 Chase
Home Fin
3/23/11 4/11/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 4/15/11
Reply Filed on 5/10/11
Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 9/16/11 – noreason
125. Shapiro 6589/11 Mellon 3/23/11 8/12/11 10/28/11
Filed by P
10/28/11 Yes Notice of Pendency filed 9/19/11
Amended Aff of Service filed 9/23/11Motion coverpage filed by P 12/8/11 – order of
reference
Order of reference withdrawn 1/26/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/25/12
126. Shapiro 6576/11 ChaseHome Fin
3/23/11 4/6/11 11/3/11Filed by P
No Yes Motion/Stip to Discontinue filed 11/4/11 – noreason
Order to Discontinue 12/21/11
Order to cancel LP filed 1/25/11
Ecourts: Motion return date 12/2/11; no FCPConference
127. Shapiro 6677/11 Residential 3/24/11 4/8/11 5/3/11
Filed by P
5/3/11 &
5/11/11
Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11
Motion coverpage filed by P on 6/2/11 – orderof reference
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/6/11
128. Shapiro 6718/11 Chase 3/24/11 4/4/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 4/12/11Reply filed 5/5/11
129. Shapiro 6828/11 US National 3/25/11 4/12/11 11/23/11Filed by P
No Yes Motion/Stip to Discontinue filed 11/30/11 – noreason
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 70/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 12
Ecourts: Motion return date 12/2/11; no FCPConference
130. Shapiro 6980/11 Merrill 3/28/11 4/11/11 11/9/11
Filed by P
11/9/11 No Notice of Appearance filed 4/25/11
Verified Answer filed 10/26/11Ecourts: No FCP Conference
131. Shapiro 6974/11 US National 3/28/11 4/11/11 No No No Verified Answer filed 5/11/11Demand for notice & inspection filed 5/11/11
132. Shapiro 7136/11 US National 3/29/11 4/6/11 No No No
133. Shapiro 7135/11 Deutsche 3/29/11 4/12/11 No No No134. Shapiro 7242/11 Phh
Mortgage
3/30/11 4/28/11 No No No Notices of Appearance Filed 4/20/11 & 5/23/11
Reply filed 5/16/11Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 10/4/11 - no reason
135. Shapiro 7257/11 Chase 3/30/11 4/5/11 No No No
136. Shapiro 7258/11 Chase 3/30/11 4/20/11 No No No Stip/Aff to discontinue filed 10/11/11 – D didnot answer or appear/no reason
137. Shapiro 7376/11 Chase 3/31/11 4/22/11 No No No Answer filed 6/6/11Notice to Produce filed 6/6/11
Demand for Appearance filed 6/6/11
Aff of Service filed 6/6/11
138. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
4869/11 HSBC 3/2/11 3/24/11 No No No Notices and Appearance and claim to surplus
monies filed on 3/23/11 & 5/5/11
139. Dorf Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
5054/11 Wells Fargo 3/4/11 4/6/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 4/6/11
140. Dorf 5055/11 HSBC 3/4/11 NONE No No No
141. Dorf
Atty Change
5051/11 HSBC 3/4/11 3/24/11 No No Yes Answer filed 4/20/11Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 71/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 13
Leopold12/8/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/22/12
142. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
5854/11 HSBC 3/15/11 4/1/11 No No No
143. Dorf 5853/11 HSBC 3/15/11 4/15/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/12/11
Stipulation to extend time for D WF to respond
filed on 4/19/11Verified Answer by D WF filed on 5/17/11
Stipulation dropping WF as Defendant filed
7/6/11
144. Dorf Atty
Change
Leopold
12/8/11
5979/11 US Nationl 3/16/11 4/25/11 No No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/22/12
145. Dorf 5980/11 Wells Fargo 3/16/11 4/11/11 No No Yes Notice of appearance filed on 4/1/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/26/12
146. Dorf 6199/11 HSBC 3/18/11 4/13/11 No No No
147. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
6198/11 HSBC 3/18/11 12/5/11 No No No
148. Dorf 6342/11 HSBC 3/21/11 4/12/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11Reply to Counter Claims w/ D’s Answer filed
5/9/11
149. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
6764/11 US Bank 3/25/11 4/13/11 No No No
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 72/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 14
150. Dorf Atty Change
Leopold
12/13/11
6765/11 HSBC 3/25/11 4/7/11 7/19/11Filed by D 10/7/11 Yes Motion to dismiss coverpage filed by D on7/19/11Orders filed 12/13/11 & 1/18/12
Order to adjourn filed 3/8/12
Motion papers withdrawn 4/10/12Ecourts: Motion return date 8/18/11 (adj several
times; withdrawn 3/13/12); No FCP Conference
151. Dorf 6768/11 HSBC 3/25/11 NONE No No No
152. Dorf Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
6913/11 HSBC 3/28/11 4/13/11 12/30/11Filed by P
12/30/11 Yes Verified Answer filed 5/3/11Aff of Service filed 5/3/11
Reply to counterclaims filed 6/3/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/28/12
153. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
6911/11 HSBC 3/28/11 4/6/11 No No No
154. Dorf 6910/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/29/11 No No No
155. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
6909/11 Bank Nat 3/28/11 4/14/11 No No No Reply to Counterclaims filed 6/9/11 (no answerfiled)
156. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
6908/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/14/11 2/17/12
Filed by P
2/17/12 Yes Motion coverpage filed by P on 2/17/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/17/12
157. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
6906/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/6/11 No No No
158. Dorf 6905/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/6/11 No No No Answer filed 9/8/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 73/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 15
159. Dorf Atty Change
Leopold
12/8/11
6904/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 4/14/11 3/8/12Filed by P 3/8/12 Yes Motion coverpage order of ref filed by P 3/8/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/2/12
160. Dorf
Atty Change
Leopold12/8/11
7205/11 HSBC 3/30/11 4/19/11 No No No
161. McCabe 4829/11 Bank Natio 3/2/11 3/17/11 10/14/11Filed by P
10/14/11 Yes Answer filed 8/18/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/17/12
162. McCabe 4954/11 Bank Natio 3/3/11 4/13/11 No No No
163. McCabe 4956/11 Bank Natio 3/3/11 3/17/11 10/6/11Filed by P
10/6/11&
12/9/11
Yes Amended affidavit of service filed on 3/22/11Notices of Appearance filed on 5/5/11 &
12/14/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/31/12
164. McCabe 5067/11 Deutsche 3/4/11 3/23/11 No No No Stip/Affirm Discontinuing Action Filed 12/8/11
& 12/13/11 - no reason
165. McCabe 5192/11 Bank Natio 3/7/11 3/24/11 No No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/12/12
166. McCabe 5301/11 HSBC 3/8/11 3/24/11 9/14/11
Filed by P
9/14/11 No Answer filed on 3/30/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/29/11
167. McCabe 5300/11 Bank Natio 3/8/11 3/23/11 2/2/12
Filed by P
2/2/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/11/12
168. McCabe 5462/11 HSBC 3/9/11 3/24/11 5/4/11
Filed by P
5/4/11 No Stip/Affirm Discontinuing Action Filed 10/6/11
– no reason169. McCabe 5778/11 Aurora 3/14/11 3/30/11 No No No
170. McCabe 5773/11 Aurora 3/14/11 3/21/11 No No No
171. McCabe 5774/11 Mellon 3/14/11 10/5/11 No No No
172. McCabe 5777/11 Citibank 3/14/11 3/30/11 No No No
173. McCabe 6826/11 Aurora 3/25/11 4/27/11 4/16/12
Filed by P
4/16/12 Yes Answer filed 9/28/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 74/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 16
174. McCabe 6825/11 Aurora 3/25/11 4/27/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11Verified Answer filed 5/27/11Reply to counterclaims filed 8/30/11
175. McCabe 7346/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 4/14/11 No No No
176. Frenkel 4952/11 Wells Fargo 3/3/11 4/12/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 3/24/11
177. Frenkel 5066/11 US Nation 3/4/11 3/15/11 No No No
178. Frenkel 5193/11 Oceanfirst 3/7/11 3/22/11 5/13/11
Filed by P
5/13/11 Yes RJI filed on 5/13/2011
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/14/11179. Frenkel 5550/11 Onewest 3/10/11 3/30/11 11/10/11
Filed by P
11/10/11 Yes Answer with counterclaims filed 1/3/12
Notice of rejection filed 1/17/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/21/12
180. Frenkel 5886/11 Duetsche 3/15/11 3/23/11 9/23/11
Filed by D
No Yes Notice of appearance and answer filed 4/20/11
Motion coverpage filed by D filed on 9/23/11
Order granting leave to file late answer filed on
11/21/11Verified reply to counterclaims filed 12/22/11
Motion coverpage filed by D on 2/6/12
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/22/12 (aftermotion practice heard; thus do not count in FCP
date)
181. Frenkel 6118/11 Wells Fargo 3/17/11 8/5/11 12/1/11
Filed by P
12/1/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/21/12
182. Frenkel 6117/11 Deutsche 3/17/11 3/24/11 12/15/11Filed by P 12/15/11 Yes Notice of Appearance & surplus monies filed5/10/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/11/12
183. Frenkel 6225/11 Wells Fargo 3/18/11 3/29/11 No No No Stip/Affirm Discontinuing Action Filed
11/10/11 – no reason
184. Weinreb 4855/11 Wells Fargo 3/2/11 3/18/11 7/21/11Filed by P
7/21/11 Yes Notice of Appearance & Surplus Monies filed4/27/11
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 75/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 17
Motion coverpage filed 7/21/11 by PEcourts: listed in ecourts but reflects noprogress in the case
185. Weinreb 4924/11 Wells Fargo 3/3/11 3/22/11 7/15/11Filed by P
7/15/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/2/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/11/11
186. Weinreb
Atty Change
Katz
9/13/11
4925/11 Bank Natio 3/3/11 3/30/11 No No No Verified Answer filed on 4/1/11
187. Weinreb 5757/11 Wells Fargo 3/14/11 3/25/11 8/26/11
Filed by P
8/26/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/29/11
188. Weinreb 6197/11 Wells Fargo 3/18/11 3/29/11 9/20/11Filed by P
9/20/11 Yes Affidavit & Affirm filed on 8/29/11Motion coverpage filed by P on 9/20/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/27/11
189. Weinreb 6339/11 Deutsche 3/21/11 4/13/11 10/28/11
Filed by P
No Yes Motion coverpgae filed by P on 10/28/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/24/12
190. Stiene 4921/11 Chase 3/3/11 3/29/11 No No No Notice of appearance and claim to surplus
monies filed on 3/29/11
191. Stiene 5243/11 Flagstar 3/8/11 3/24/11 8/3/11
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/18/11
192. Stiene 5525/11 Flagstar 3/10/11 6/6/11 8/3/11
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 11/29/11
193. Stiene 5524/11 Flagstar 3/10/11 3/24/11 7/25/11
Filed by P
7/25/11 Yes Answer filed on 3/23/11
D Interrogs filed 6/8/11Notice of Appearance filed 12/2/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/8/11
194. Stiene 6343/11 Chase 3/21/11 4/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance and claims for surplus
monies filed 5/6/11
195. Steine
Atty Change
6566/11 Flagstar 3/23/11 5/27/11 No No No
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 76/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 18
Knuckles1/9/12
196. Steine 6668/11 Chase 3/24/11 4/25/11 3/15/12
Filed by P
3/15/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/15/12
197. Stiene 6912/11 Flagstar 3/28/11 4/22/11 8/9/11
Filed by P
8/9/11 Yes Verified Answer filed 6/6/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/12/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/25/11
198. Stein 4721/11 US Nation 3/1/11 3/16/11 No No No
199. Stein 6283/11 US Nation 3/18/11 3/28/11 8/9/11Filed by P
8/9/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/18/11Verified Answer with counterclaim filed on
4/19/11 & 4/27/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/25/11
200. Stein 6593/11 Chase 3/23/11 3/30/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11
201. Stein 6715/11 Financial
Freedom
3/24/11 3/31/11 12/14/11
Filed by P
12/14/11
& 2/6/12
Yes Verified Answer filed on 4/15/11
Notices of appearance filed on 4/15/11 &
5/5/11Motion coverpage filed by p on 12/14/11
Ecourts: Motion return date 3/7/12; no FCP
conference
202. Stein 6970/11 Everbank 3/28/11 4/11/11 5/16/11
Filed by P
5/16/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 9/27/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 6/29/11 (H/Odefault 7/14/11)
203. Stein 7360/11 Financial
Freedom
3/31/11 5/9/11 No No No Notice of Appearance & surplus monies filed
4/27/11204. Stein 7361/11 Chase
Home
Finance
3/31/11 4/28/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 4/27/11, 5/5/11,
5/20/11
205. Derose 4714/11 Deutsche 3/1/11 3/30/11 12/2/11
Filed by P
12/2/11 Yes Verified answer filed on 3/16/11
Notices of Appearance filed 5/5/11 & 5/19/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 3/7/12
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 77/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 19
206. Derose 5660/11 HSBC 3/11/11 4/1/11 No No No207. Derose 5661/11 HSBC 3/11/11 3/28/11 No No No Stip to Discontinue Action filed 5/6/11 – paid
arrears
208. Derose 6536/11 Deutsche 3/30/11 5/6/11 7/21/11
Filed by P
7/21/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11
Affirm filed 6/28/11
Motion coverpage filed by P on 12/12/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 9/14/11
209. Berkman 5389/11 Central
Mortgage
3/8/11 3/29/11 No No No Reply to counterclaims filed 4/20/11
210. Berkman 5710/11 Federal
National
3/11/11 3/17/11 No No No
211. Berkman 6553/11 Central
Mortgage
3/23/11 4/28/11 1/25/12
Filed by P
1/25/12 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/28/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/16/12
212. Druckman 6378/11 BofNY 3/21/11 4/14/11 No No No
213. Druckman 6973/11 US Bank 3/28/11 5/4/11 No No No
214. Druckman 7379/11 Wells Fargo 3/31/11 4/14/11 No No No Stip to Discontinue Action filed 11/1/11 – loanmod
215. Stagg 7400/11 Mid-islandMorg
3/31/11 7/5/11 4/6/11Filed by P
4/6/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/19/11
216. Stagg 7402/11 Mid-islandMorg
3/31/11 4/6/11 No No No Notice of appear/waiver filed on 4/6/11Stip to Discontinue filed on 5/31/11 – loan mod
217. Harris 5551/11 Emigrant 3/10/11 3/24/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/29/11, amend on 4/12/11
Reply filed 5/11/11
218. Schiller 4688/11 MT bank 3/1/11 5/19/11 7/11/11Filed by P
7/11/11 Yes Answer filed on 3/25/11Reply filed 6/20/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 8/9/11
219. Schiller 6099/11 Suntrust 3/17/11 3/25/11 10/25/11
Filed by P
10/25/11 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11
Affidavot of Service filed 6/15/11Motion coverpage filed by P (order of ref) filed
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 78/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 20
10/25/11Ecourts: First FCP Conference 12/14/11
220. Davidson 6695/11 Wells Fargo 3/24/11 3/31/11 No No No Verified answer filed on 4/6/11
Stip to Discontinue filed on 6/13/11 – mtgreinstated
221. Platzer 6017/11 Chase 3/16/11 NONE No No No Stip to Discontinue filed on 2/7/12 - no reason
222. Weisberg
Atty Change
Bryan Cave7/11/11
7081/11 Bac HomeLoans
3/29/11 4/14/11 No No Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/1/12
223. Weisberg 7080/11 BofA 3/29/11 4/14/11 No No No Answer & Aff of Service filed 5/20/11
Supplement to Answer & Aff of Service filed5/27/11
Reply to counterclaim filed 6/7/11
Supplemental Answer to counterclaim filed
6/9/11
224. Cohn 6682/11 BofA 3/24/11 4/8/11 4/8/11
Filed by P
4/8/11 Yes Stip to Discontinue filed 6/29/11 – loan mod
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 5/19/11
225. Hiscock 6827/11 Bayview 03/25/11 4/27/11 No No No
226. Graham 6491/11 Astoria Fed 3/22/11 4/15/11 7/25/11
Unable toView RJI
Unable
to View
Yes Unable to open RJI filing in clerk minutes
Motion coverpage filed by P 3/1/12Ecourts: First FCP Conference 10/18/11
227. May 5241/11 Bank Natio 3/8/11 12/15/11 2/15/12
Filed by P
2/15/11 Yes Verified reply filed 4/26/11
Motion coverpage filed by P on 2/16/12Ecourts: Motion for order of reference 2/27/12;
no FCP Conference
228. Katz 6005/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 4/1/11 10/28/11
Filed by P
10/28/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 2/14/12
229. Rosenblum 6927/11 Flatbush 3/28/11 4/7/11 6/9/11 6/9/11 Yes Motion coverpage (order of ref) filed by P on
Kings County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 79/134
Last Reviewed April 17, 2012 21
Fed Savings Filed by P 6/9/11Answer filed 7/6/11D Consents to Change attorney 1/23/12
Directive (for good faith hearing) filed 5/3/12
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 7/20/11
230. Roach 5112/11 Wells Fargo 3/4/11 4/1/11 1/23/12
Filed by P
1/23/11 Yes Answer filed 4/4/11
Ecourts: First FCP Conference 4/4/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 80/134
APPENDIX E
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
1 Baum - Atty 5087/11 Deutsche 3/1/11 3/18/11 6/15/11 6/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 8/11/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 81/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 1
1. Baum - Atty
Change -Rosicki
12/20/11
5087/11 Deutsche 3/1/11 3/18/11 6/15/11
Filed by P
6/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 8/11/11
Order signed 8/16/11 - Removed from FCP due toD default
Order of Reference filed 9/12/11
Notice of Entry filed 10/7/11
2. Baum - Atty
Change -Rosicki
12/7/11
5213/11 Wells F 3/2/11 3/10/11 11/1/11
Filed by P
11/1/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 1/4/12 in Pilot Project
Answer & Counterclaims filed 3/14/11Notice of Appearance filed 4/7/11
Reply to Answer & Counterclaims filed 4/7/113. Baum
Atty Change
- Frenkel1/13/12
5214/11 Wells F 3/2/11 4/4/11 8/5/11
Filed by P
8/5/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 9/26/11
Order Signed 10/5/11 - Removed from FCP
because not owner occupied
4. Baum
Atty Change
- GPO
12/29/11
5215/11 US Bank 3/2/11 3/18/11 7/15/11Filed by P
7/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 9/22/11Order signed 9/26/11 - removed from FCP due to D
default
5. Baum 5344/11 Deutsche 3/3/11 3/15/11 No No No
6. Baum 5436/11 Metlife 3/4/11 3/18/11 No No No
7. Baum 5437/11 Metlife 3/4/11 3/14/11 No No No Answer filed on 3/28/11
8. Baum 5439/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/16/11 8/19/11Filed by P
8/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/6/11 and loanreinstated
Notice of Appearance filed 9/20/11
Notices of Motion to Discontinue filed 1/17/12 &2/9/12
9. Baum 5440/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/16/11 No No No
10. Baum - Atty
Change -
Fein
1/19/12
5441/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/16/11 7/15/11Filed by P
7/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/22/11Notice of Appearance filed on 10/21/11
Order Signed 11/9/11 - removed from FCP because
D failed to show sufficient income
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Answer filed 12/13/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 82/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 2
Answer filed 12/13/11
H/o atty is George Russo 718-849-6900
11. Baum - Atty
Change -Rosicki
12/22/11
5442/11 Wells F 3/4/11 3/16/11 10/14/11
Filed by P
10/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 12/01/11 and is
ongoingNotices of Appearance filed 3/21/11 & 4/19/11
12. Baum - Atty
Change -
Berkman12/7/11
5554/11 Wells F 3/7/11 3/21/11 9/23/11
Filed by P
9/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/09/11 and is
ongoing
Notice of Appearance filed on 12/21/11Notice of Motion to Extend Time to Answer filed
1/11/12
13. Baum 5555/11 M&T 3/7/11 3/18/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/9/11 - D paid off
mtg
14. Baum 5696/11 Wells F 3/8/11 3/18/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/9/11 - "work out"
15. Baum -
Atty Change
- 12/6/11
5806/11 Wells F 3/9/11 3/23/11 8/17/11
Filed by P
8/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/05/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/22/11
Order signed 10/12/11 - removed from FCP due toD default
16. Baum - Atty
Change -
Shapiro
1/27/12
5808/11 PNC 3/9/11 3/22/11 No No No Answer filed 3/31/11Reply to Counterclaims filed 4/18/11
17. Baum 5934/11 Wells F 3/10/11 3/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11
18. Baum
Atty Change
- Berkman12/6/11
5935/11 Wells F 3/10/11 3/22/11 No No No
19. Baum - Atty
Change -
Rosicki
6040/11 Wells F 3/11/11 3/24/11 10/18/11
Filed by P
10/18/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/06/11
Answer filed 3/24/11
Ecourts reflects that case was ordered out of FSC
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
on 03/12/12 due to h/o default
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 83/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 3
20. Baum 6043/11 Wells F 3/11/11 3/24/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/31/11
Stipulation filed 3/31/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/26/11 - reinstatedmtg
21. Baum 6048/11 Aurora 3/11/11 4/22/11 12/30/11
Filed by D
No Yes Ecourts reflects “f/c – No Conf”
LP re-filed 4/11/11
Amended Complaint filed 4/8/11
Notice of Motion to Discontinue filed 12/30/11Defendant atty – Alan Gitter (AG?) 212-341-2258
22. Baum - Atty
Change -
Steine
Weiner12/6/11
6156/11 Wells F 3/14/11 3/24/11 8/2/11
Filed by P
8/2/11 No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11
No Ecourts Record
23. Baum - Atty
Change -Knuckles
1/19/12
6302/11 Wells F 3/15/11 3/24/11 7/14/11
Filed by P
7/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 09/21/11
Answer filed 3/28/11Order Signed 12/6/11 - removed from FCP because
D's income insufficientH/o atty Alice Nicholson 800-323-3034
24. Baum 6303/11 M&T 3/15/11 3/30/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/8/11 -reinstated
mtg
25. Baum 6458/11 Wells F 3/16/11 4/14/11 1/17/12
Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/14/11
Notice of Motion filed on 1/17/12
26. Baum - Atty
Change -Frenkel
12/7/11
6459/11 Wells F 3/16/11 3/29/11 No No No
27. Baum - Atty 6578/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/31/11 8/4/11 8/4/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 09/26/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Change - Filed by P Order Signed 10/5/11 - removed from FCP due to
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 84/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 4
g
Fein12/1/11
y g
D's default
28. Baum - Atty
Change -
Rosicki
12/6/11
6579/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/28/11 10/7/11Filed by P
10/7/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 11/29/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance filed 12/13/11
H.o atty Jonathan Koren 347-920-4930
29. Baum 6580/11 Wells F 3/17/11 3/28/11 11/1/11
Filed by P
12/20/11 Yes Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/9/11 - short sale
30. Baum - Atty
Change -
Zeicher
12/13/11
6581/11 GMAC 3/17/11 4/12/11 6/16/11
Filed by P
6/16/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 08/12/11, but h/o didn’t
appear at next FSC on 10/03/11
Stipulation filed 5/19/11
Reply to Counterclaims filed 6/2/11Order signed 10/11/11 - removed from FCP due to
D default
Combined Demands by P filed 11/10/11Response filed 11/10/11
31. Baum - Atty
Change -
Frenkel
12/20/11
6632/11 Deutsche 3/17/11 3/29/11 6/8/11Filed by P
6/8/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 08/09/11 (but h/odefaulted)
Notice of Appearance filed 6/1/11
Order Signed 8/11/11 - removed from FCP due toD's default
32. Baum 6738/11 Aurora 3/18/11 3/30/11 1/20/11
Filed by D
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed on 4/26/11
Notice of Motion to Discontinue filed 1/20/12Order granting motion dated 02/12/23
33. Baum - Atty
Change -
Knuckles1/18/11
6829/11 Wells F 3/21/11 3/31/11 5/9/11
Filed by P
5/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/21/11, but notes
that “FSC – not eligible”
Notice of Appearance filed 1/3/12Order Signed 1/5/12 - removed from FCP because
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
not owner-occupied
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 85/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 5
34. Baum - Atty
Change -
GPO1/4/12
6830/11 Wells F 3/21/11 4/27/11 6/24/11
Filed by P
6/24/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 08/12/11, but h/o
defaulted at 2d FSC held on 08/26/11
Notice of Appearance filed 8/15/11Order Signed 8/30/11 - removed from FCP due to
D default
35. Baum - Atty
Change -
Fein12/7/11
6985/11 Wells F 3/22/11 3/31/11 8/5/11
Filed by P
8/5/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/26/11 and ongoing
Ecourts reflects trial mod on 01/30/12
Answer filed on 4/6/11Notice of Appearance filed on 4/26/11
H/o atty Usman Ahmad 718-482-7777
36. Baum 6986/11 Midfirst 3/22/11 3/31/11 1/24/12
Filed by P
No Yes LP re-filed on 4/8/11
Amended Complaint filed on 4/8/11
Affs of Service with Complaint filed on 4/15/11 &4/18/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
Notice of Motion to Discontinue filed 1/24/11 (noreason)
H/o atty Richard Babinecz 212-460-3355
37. Baum - Atty
Change -
Rosicki12/7/11
7130/11 Wells F 3/23/11 3/31/11 No No No Answer filed 4/27/11
Notice of appearance of co-counsel (Hogan
Lovells) filed 5/25/11
38. Baum 7131/11 Wells F 3/23/11 3/30/11 1/20/12
Filed by P
No Yes Answer filed on 3/31/11
Notice of Motion filed 1/20/1239. Baum
Atty Change
- Frenkel
12/21/11
7133/11 Wells F 3/23/11 4/1/11 10/14/11Filed by P
10/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 12/01/11, but h/odefaulted
Order Signed 12/6/11 - removed from FCP due to
D default
40. Baum - Atty 7281/11 Wells F 3/24/11 4/4/11 10/14/11 10/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 12/02/11 and ongoing
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Change - Filed by P Answer filed 5/6/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 86/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 6
Frenkel12/20/11
H/S atty Volakos Law Firm 718-836-4800
41. Baum 7300/11 GMAC 3/24/11 4/20/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/8/11 - mtgmodified
42. Baum - Atty
Change -
Knuckles
11/23/11
7301/11 Aurora 3/24/11 4/4/11 No No No Answer filed 5/6/11
43. Baum - Atty
Change -
Rosicki
12/7/11
7302/11 Wells F 3/24/11 4/8/11 9/26/11Filed by P
9/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/09/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance filed 4/13/11
Notice of Appearance filed 12/21/11
H/o atty Michael Lee 718-967-5297
44. Baum 7461/11 Aurora 3/25/11 4/6/11 No No No Answer filed 5/9/11
P's Bill of Particulars & Combined demands filed9/6/11
45. Baum - AttyChange -
Shapiro
12/12/11
7592/11 RCS 3/28/11 4/8/11 5/12/11Filed by P
5/12/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 08/08/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance filed 8/24/11
H/o atty Carl Maltzman 516-791-7715
46. Baum 7594/11 US Bank 3/28/11 4/6/11 8/26/11
Filed by P
8/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 10/12/11 and ongoing
Order Signed 1/18/12 - removed from FCP becauseD failed to provide requested documents
47. Baum 7595/11 Everehome 3/28/11 4/5/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/6/11 - mtg
reinstated48. Baum - Atty
Change -
Rosicki
12/7/11
7721/11 Wells F 3/29/11 4/12/11 7/14/11Filed by P
7/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 09/21/11 and ongoing
49. Baum - Atty 7723/11 Wells F 3/29/11 4/12/11 7/21/11 7/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 09/23/11 and ongoing
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Change -
B k
Filed by P Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 02/10/12 and ongoing
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 87/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 7
Berkman
50. Baum - Atty
Change -Frenkel
12/15/11
7724/11 M&T 3/29/11 4/7/11 7/21/11
Filed by P
7/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 09/22/11 and ongoing
Order Signed 9/26/11 - removed from FCP due toD's default
Ecourts reflects back to FSC 11/10/11
51. Baum - Atty
Change -
Frenkel12/7/11
7833/11 Wells F 3/30/11 4/18/11 8/26/11
Filed by P
8/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 10/11/11, but h/o
defaulted
Order Signed 11/9/11 - removed from FCP due toD's default
52. Baum 7834/11 Wells F 3/30/11 4/8/11 1/24/11
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts reflects case as “F/C – No Conf”
Notices of Appearance filed 4/21/11 & 4/26/11
Motion to Discontinue (no reason) 01/25/12
Defendant’s atty Vernon & Assoc 718-206-2411
53. Baum - Atty
Change -
Rosicki12/7/11
7835/11 Wells F 3/30/11 4/7/11 7/11/11Filed by P
7/11/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 09/21/11, but h/o defaultedOrder Signed 9/26/11 - removed from FCP due to
D default
54. Baum - Atty
Change -Steine
Weiner
11/23/11
7836/11 Aurora 3/30/11 4/7/11 No No No Answer filed 11/4/11
55. Baum - Atty
Change -Knuckles11/23/11
7837/11 Aurora 3/30/11 4/12/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
Answer filed 5/18/11
56. Baum - Atty
Change -
Steine
7838/11 Aurora 3/30/11 5/27/11 No No No
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Weiner
11/29/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 88/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 8
11/29/11
57. Baum 7839/11 Nationstar 3/30/11 4/7/11 5/27/11
Filed by P
5/27/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 08/09/11, but trial mod
notedEcourts reflects 2nd FSC on 10/18/11, with the note
“settled: mha program”
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/22/11 - D paid off mtg
58.
Baum - AttyChange -
Fein
12/16/11
7840/11 Bank of NY 3/30/11 4/8/11 No No No
59. Baum 7966/11 Wells F 3/31/11 4/11/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 6/2/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 12/13/11 - mtgreinstated
60. Baum 7970/11 Wells F 3/31/11 4/11/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 7/18/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/9/12 - mtg reinstated61. Baum -
Atty Change
- Shapiro1/20/12
7971/11 PNC 3/31/11 4/11/11 No No No Answer filed on 4/22/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
62. Baum - Atty
Change -
Roach1/19/12
7972/11 DLJ 3/31/11 4/12/11 6/15/11
Filed by P
6/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 08/10/11, but h/o defaulted
Order Signed 8/16/11 - removed from FCP due to
D's default
63. Rosicki 5054/11 Chase 3/01/11 03/09/11 No No No Answer filed 03/23/11Notice of Appearance filed 3/24/11
64. Rosicki 5102/11 Wells F 3/01/11 03/11/11 No No No
65. Rosicki 5104/11 Flagstar 3/01/11 03/09/11 03/28/11 3/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 05/13/11, a TPP mod by
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Filed by P 07/15/11, and a permanent mod by 11/14/11
Answer filed 03/11/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 89/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 9
Answer filed 03/11/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/21/11 – mtg
modified
66. Rosicki 5254/11 Chase 3/02/11 03/10/11 No No No
67. Rosicki 5255/11 US Bank 3/02/11 03/09/11 No No No Answer filed 04/06/11
68. Rosicki 5484/11 Chase 3/04/11 03/15/11 No No No
69. Rosicki 5580/11 Wells F 3/07/11 03/22/11 5/2/11
Filed by P
5/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 06/20/11, but h/o
defaultedOrder Signed 6/23/11 – Removed from FCP due to
D’s default
70. Rosicki 5584/11 Chase 3/07/11 03/16/11 No No No
71. Rosicki 5585/11 Deutsche 3/07/11 03/23/11 8/16/11
Filed by P
8/16/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 09/29/11 and 2d FSC
on 12/09/11
Answer filed 03/25/11
Reply to Counterclaims filed 04/20/11
Notice of Appearance filed 12/20/11Order Signed 12/22/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s insufficient income
72. Rosicki 5725/11 BNY 3/08/11 03/28/11 04/05/11
Filed by P
4/5/11 Yes Ecourts reflects st FSC on 05/24/11, but h/o
defaultedOrder Signed 6/3/11 – Removed from FCP due to
D’s default
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/3/11 – short sale
73. Rosicki 5726/11 LNV Corp. 3/08/11 04/05/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 04/14/1174. Rosicki 5727/11 GMAC 3/08/11 5/9/11 No No No
75. Rosicki 6059/11 Chase 3/11/11 03/29/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 8/2/11
76. Rosicki 6061/11 DLJ Mtg 3/11/11 03/22/11 8/15/11
Filed by P
8/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 9/29/11 and continuing
Notice of Appearance filed 12/21/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
77. Rosicki 6062/11 Chase 3/11/11 03/22/11 No No No
78 Rosicki 6110/11 Fannie Mae 3/11/11 03/22/11 5/5/11 No No Ecourts does not reflect this case
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 90/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 10
78. Rosicki 6110/11 Fannie Mae 3/11/11 03/22/11 5/5/11Filed by D
No No Ecourts does not reflect this caseNotice of Motion Filed 5/5/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/24/11 – lossmitigation achieved
Not in ecourts
79. Rosicki 6111/11 Kondaur 3/11/11 03/22/11 5/9/11
Filed by P
5/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 07/01/11
Order Signed7/25/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s defaultOrder of Reference filed 10/19/11 with DD Aff
Notice of Entry filed 1/3/12
Notice of Motion filed 1/27/12
80. Rosicki 6113/11 Chase 3/11/11 03/22/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/2/11 – loss
mitigation achieved
81. Rosicki 6207/11 Wells F 3/14/11 03/24/11 04/04/11Filed by P
4/4/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 05/13/11Answer filed 04/12/11
Reply to Counterclaims filed 04/20/11Notice of Appearance filed 6/3/11
Order Signed 8/11/11 – removed from FCP due toD’s default
82. Rosicki 6209/11 Chase 3/14/11 03/24/11 No No No
83. Rosicki 6210/11 Flagstar 3/14/11 03/24/11 03/30/11Filed by P
3/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 05/13/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/25/11 – mtg
modified
84. Rosicki 6431/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/28/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/9/1185. Rosicki 6558/11 Deutsche 3/17/11 03/30/11 5/20/11
Filed by P5/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1
stFSC on 07/05/11
Order Signed 7/25/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s default
86. Rosicki 6655/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/28/11 No No No Answers filed 04/06/11 and 04/21/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/21/11 – mtg
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
modified
87 Rosicki 6656/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/28/11 04/19/11 4/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 6/10/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 91/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 11
87. Rosicki 6656/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/28/11 04/19/11Filed by P
4/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1 FSC on 6/10/11Answer filed 04/14/11
Order Signed 2/1/12 – removed from FCP becauseD failed to provide documents
88. Rosicki 6659/11 Wall Street 3/18/11 03/29/11 6/2/11
Filed by P
6/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 07/14/11
Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11
Order Signed 7/20/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s defaultNotice of Motion filed 8/11/11
Ecourts reflects marked off calendar 09/20/11
89. Rosicki 6744/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/31/11 04/15/11
Filed by P
4/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 06/02/11 and ongoing
Notice of Appearance filed 6/17/11
H/o atty Jonathon Koren 347-920-4930
90. Rosicki 6928/11 Chase 3/22/11 03/30/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11
91. Rosicki 7200/11 Chase 3/23/11 04/05/11 No No No Reply to Counterclaims filed 5/11/11
92. Rosicki 7282/11 BNY 3/24/11 04/28/11 No No No93. Rosicki –
Atty Change
–
Bonchonsky6/29/11
7477/11 Chase 3/25/11 04/05/11 No No No Answer filed 04/07/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/14/11
94. Rosicki 7479/11 Chase 3/25/11 04/08/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11
95. Rosicki 7681/11 Chase 3/29/11 04/14/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/16/11 – no reason
96. Rosicki 7682/11 Live Well 3/29/11 04/08/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/10/11
97. Rosicki 7775/11 US Bank 3/30/11 04/13/11 5/20/11Filed by P
5/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 07/05/11, noting that aTPP was in place
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/6/11 – mtg modified
98. McCabe 5064/11 US Bank 3/01/11 03/18/11 11/10/11
Filed by P
11/10/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 01/15/12
Order Signed 1/11/11 – removed from FCP due to
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
D’s default
99. McCabe 5180/11 BNY 3/02/11 03/25/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 92/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 12
99. McCabe 5180/11 BNY 3/02/11 03/25/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11
100 McCabe 5181/11 US Bank 3/02/11 03/18/11 10/13/11
Filed by P
10/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 12/01/11
Order Signed 12/6/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s default
101 McCabe 5188/11 Deutsche 3/02/11 03/15/11 No No No
102 McCabe 5323/11 Deutsche 3/03/11 04/01/11 No No No
103 McCabe 5451/11 US Bank 3/04/11 04/01/11 9/23/11
Filed by P
9/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 11/09/11
Answer filed 04/04/11Order Signed 11/17/11
104 McCabe 5452/11 Deutsche 3/04/11 03/16/11 No No No Answer filed 03/23/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/27/11
105 McCabe 5453/11 Deutsche 3/04/11 03/23/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/16/11 – no reason
106 McCabe 5678/11 OneWest 3/08/11 03/25/11 No No No
107 McCabe 5679/11 Deutsche 3/08/11 04/01/11 11/16/11
Filed by P
11/16/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 1st FSC on 01/11/12
Answer filed 04/13/11
Reply to Counterclaim filed 04/19/11Order Signed 1/18/12 – removed from FCP due toD’s default
108 McCabe 6151/11 Deutsche 3/14/11 03/22/11 2/8/12
Filed by P
2/8/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 03/19/12 and ongoing
Answer filed 03/25/11
H/o atty Beverly Benjaim-Gee through QVLP
109 McCabe 6153/11 Aurora 3/14/11 03/22/11 No No No Answer filed 4/28/11
110 McCabe 6154/11 M. Stanley 3/14/11 04/0411 10/20/11
Filed by P
10/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 12/05/11 and ongoing
111 McCabe 6155/11 HSBC 3/14/11 04/14/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/16/11 – no reason
112 McCabe 6438/11 Aurora 3/16/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/4/11 – no reason
113 McCabe 6562/11 US Bank 3/17/11 04/04/11 No No No
114 McCabe 6563/11 Wells F 3/17/11 04/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/28/11 – no reason
115 McCabe 6814/11 Deutsche 3/21/11 04/06/11 No No No Answer filed 4/27/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 93/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 13
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/18/11 – no reason
116 McCabe 7093/11 Aurora 3/23/11 04/01/11 2/8/12
Filed by P
2/8/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 03/20/12
117 McCabe 7094/11 Deutsche 3/23/11 04/14/11 8/5/11Filed by D
No Yes Notice of Motion filed 8/5/11Order Signed 9/12/11 – Motion to Dismiss Denied
118 McCabe 7097/11 Deutsche 3/23/11 04/14/11 No No No
119 McCabe 7420/11 HSBC 3/25/11 04/14/11 9/20/11Filed by P
9/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 11/02/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance field 1/25/12
H/o attty Jonathan Koran 347-920-4930
120 McCabe 7421/11 Aurora 3/25/11 04/14/11 No No No
121 McCabe 7571/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 04/14/11 10/20/11
Filed by P
10/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC 12/06/11 and ongoing
Answer filed 04/13/11
Notices of Appearances filed 7/29/11 & 12/20/11122 McCabe 7582/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 04/15/11 10/13/11
Filed by P
10/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSCon 12/01/11
Answer filed 12/1/11Notice of Appearance filed 12/13/11
123 McCabe 7701/11 Deutsche 3/29/11 04/18/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/14/11 – no reason
124 McCabe 7702/11 Trucap Trst 3/29/11 04/14/11 1/6/12Filed by P
12/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 02/23/12
125 McCabe 7703/11 Aurora 3/29/11 04/14/11 No No No126 McCabe 7798/11 Aurora 3/30/11 04/14/11 No No No
127 McCabe 7950/11 Wells F 3/31/11 04/18/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
128 McCabe 7951/11 Aurora 3/31/11 5/20/11 2/8/11
Filed by P
2/8/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 03/21/11 (Judge Grays –
pilot project)
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
129 McCabe 7964/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 04/15/11 10/26/11
Filed byP
10/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 12/12/11 and ongoing
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 94/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 14
y
130 McCabe 7965/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 04/21/11 12/2/11Filed by P
12/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 01/18/12 and ongoingAnswer filed 4/27/11
Demand for Notice & Inspection 2/27/11
131 Shapiro 5078/11 Chase 3/0111 05/18/11 No No No Answer filed 04/07/11
Verified Answer filed 04/25/11
Reply Filed 5/16/11132 Shapiro 5444/11 Deutsche 3/04/11 03/10/11 No No No Answer filed 5/10/11
Reply filed 5/24/11
133 Shapiro 5682/11 Chase 3/08/11 03/17/11 No No No Answer filed 04/11/11Reply filed 4/26/11
134 Shapiro 5780/11 Deutsche 3/09/11 04/05/11 6/10/11Filed by P
6/10/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 07/26/11Amended Notice of Appearance filed 7/22/11
Order Signed 8/11/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s default135 Shapiro 6149/11 Chase 3/14/11 03/17/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 4/27/11 – no reason
136 Shapiro 6150/11 Chase 3/14/11 03/17/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 3/24/11
137 Shapiro 6329/11 PHH Mtg 3/15/11 04/11/11 6/14/11
Filed by P
6/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 07/29/11 and ongoing
Amended Complaint filed 04/04/11
Notice of Appereance filed 8/24/11
138 Shapiro 6447/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/21/11 7/8/11
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts does not reflect a FSC
Answer filed 04/06/11Order discontinuing the action, with all papers,
filed 8/12/11 – failed to file RPAPL 1304 90-Daynotice
Notice of Entry filed 12/7/11
H/o atty Charles Spraggins 718-445-9111
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
139 Shapiro 6449/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/22/11 No No No
140 Shapiro 6451/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 03/21/11 12/13/11 No Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC on 02/01/12 and ongoing
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 95/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 15
Filed by D Answer filed 03/23/11
Reply filed 04/13/11Notice of Appearance filed 12/13/11
H/o counsel: MFY (Rubinov)
141 Shapiro 6453/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/31/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/9/11 – no reason
142 Shapiro 6596/11 Wells F 3/17/11 03/22/11 9/8/11
Filed by P
9/8/11 Yes Received Papers 9/14/11
Order Signed 9/14/11 for Judgment of Foreclosure
and to Appoint RefereeAffirmation 9/14/11
143 Shapiro 6820/11 US Bank 3/21/11 03/24/11 11/15/11Filed by P
11/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 01/12/12Answer filed 04/13/11
Order Signed 1/18/12 - removed from FCP due to
D’s default
144 Shapiro 6821/11 Chase 3/21/11 03/30/11 No No No
145 Shapiro 6822/11 Deutsche 3/21/11 04/21/11 9/29/11Filed by P
9/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 11/16/11Order Signed 11/25/11 – Removed from FCP due
to D’s default
146 Shapiro 6933/11 Chase 3/22/11 04/04/11 8/11/11
Filed by P
No Yes Answer filed 04/11/11
Reply filed 5/3/11Notice of Motion filed 8/11/11
Order Signed Discontinuing action filed 9/13/11 –
mtg modified
147 Shapiro 6935/11 Chase 3/22/11 03/30/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 4/26/11 – no reason148 Shapiro 6936/11 Chase 3/22/11 03/31/11 No No No Stipulations filed 04/21/11 & 6/20/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/17/11 – no reason
149 Shapiro 6938/11 PHH Mtg 3/22/11 03/29/11 No No No Answer filed 04/15/11
Notices of Appearance filed 5/9/11 & 5/11/11
150 Shapiro 6939/11 BNY 3/22/11 03/30/11 7/19/11 7/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC 09/01/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Filed by P Order Signed 11/25/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s default151 Sh i 7103/11 BNY 3/23/11 04/27/11 N N N S i /Aff Di i fil d 6/8/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 96/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 16
151 Shapiro 7103/11 BNY 3/23/11 04/27/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 6/8/11 – no reason
152 Shapiro 7446/11 Chase 3/25/11 04/13/11 No No No
153 Shapiro 7474/11 US Bank 3/25/11 04/11/11 No No No Answer filed 5/31/11
Notice of Entry Filed 7/12/11
154 Shapiro 7475/11 US Bank 3/25/11 04/08/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/20/11 – no reason
155 Shapiro 7620/11 B of A 3/28/11 04/04/11 04/20/11
Filed by D
No Yes Homeowner filed RJI, Answer and Motion to
Dismiss 04/20/11Notices of Appearance filed 4/25/11 & 5/24/11
Reply filed 5/13/11Affirmation in Opposition, reply. Received Papers
filed 9/9/11
Order signed 9/9/11 for Scheduling ConferenceStipulation of discontinuance filed 11/10/11 –
jointly filed by both parties; no reason
Order Signed 2/8/12156 Shapiro 7621/11 Chase 3/28/11 04/06/11 No No No
157 Shapiro 7698/11 US Bank 3/29/11 04/01/11 No No No Stip of Discontinuance filed 04/22/11 – no reason
158 Shapiro 7820/11 Chase 3/30/11 04/11/11 No No No Answer filed 04/14/11
Reply filed 5/4/11
159 Shapiro 7821/11 PHH Mtg 3/30/11 04/11/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/26/12 – no reason
160 Shapiro 7822/11 US Bank 3/30/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/11/11 – no reason
161 Shapiro 7938/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 05/17/11 No No No
162 Shapiro 7940/11 Chase 3/31/11 05/6/11 No No No163 Shapiro 7944/11 Chase 3/31/11 04/05/11 No No No
164 Shapiro 7945/11 Chase 3/31/11 04/29/11 No No No
165 Shapiro 7947/11 Chase 3/31/11 04/07/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/29/11Received Papers 5/3/11
166 Shapiro 7976/11 US Bank 3/31/11 04/13/11 10/24/11 10/24/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/14/11 and ongoing
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Filed by P Answer filed 7/25/11
Reply filed 8/17/11Notice of Appearance filed 9/9/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 97/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 17
Notice of Appearance filed 9/9/11
167 Fein 5077/11 B of A 3/01/11 03/23/11 No No No Answer filed 03/29/11
168 Fein 5079/11 US Bank 3/01/11 03/22/11 6/2/11
Filed by P
6/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 07/21/11
Order Signed 2/1/12 – removed from FCP due toD’s default
169 Fein 5268/11 Wells F 3/02/11 03/23/11 6/7/11
Filed by P
6/7/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/21/11
Order Signed 7/28/11 – removed from FCP due to
D default
Affidavits & Unsigned Order/Judges memo Filed10/4/11
Order of Reference filed 11/9/11
Notice of Entry Filed 11/22/11
170 Fein 5326/11 Chase 3/03/11 04/20/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/20/11 – no reason
171 Fein 5327/11 Deutsche 3/03/11 03/22/11 7/15/11
Filed by P
7/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/02/11
Order Signed 12/6/11 – removed from FCP becauseunable to be settled
H/o atty – Ali & Bains, P.C. 718-382-2400
172 Fein 5328/11 Chase 3/03/11 03/10/11 No No No Answer filed 04/08/11
173 Fein 5330/11 Chase 3/03/11 03/22/11 No No No Answer filed 04/06/11
174 Fein 5362/11 OneWest 3/03/11 03/10/11 8/30/11Filed by P
8/30/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 10/20/11Order signed 11/9/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s default
175 Fein 5447/11 Virtual Bnk 3/04/11 03/15/11 No No No176 Fein 5449/11 Chase 3/04/11 04/04/11 No No No
177 Fein 5450/11 Chase 3/04/11 03/21/11 No No No
178 Fein 5552/11 PNC Bank 3/07/11 03/23/11 8/9/11
Filed by P
No Yes Notices of Motion filed 8/9/11 & 10/31/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
179 Fein 5553/11 Deutsche 3/07/11 03/23/11 10/17/11
Filed by P
10/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/29/11 and ongoing
Ecourts reflects TPP 03/13/12Answer filed 04/13/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 98/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 18
Answer filed 04/13/11
Reply filed 04/14/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/27/11
180 Fein 5684/11 OneWest 3/08/11 03/21/11 7/13/11
Filed by P
7/13/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 08/29/11 and ongoing
Answer filed 03/28/11Notice of Appearance filed 10/25/11
Order Signed 1/18/12 – removed from FCP because
D does not qualify for a mod
181 Fein 5688/11 Chase 3/08/11 04/04/11 No No No Amended Complaint filed 03/25/11
182 Fein 5799/11 Deutsche 3/09/11 04/05/11 8/4/11
Filed by P
8/4/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 09/13/11
Amended Complaint filed 03/23/11
Order Signed 9/21/11 – removed from FCP due toD default
183 Fein 5800/11 PNC Bank 3/09/11 04/25/11 6/23/11
Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Motion filed 6/23/11
184 Fein 5912/11 Chase 3/10/11 03/23/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/17/11 – no reason
185 Fein 5914/11 Chase 3/10/11 03/28/11 No No No Reply filed 04/14/11 & 5/24/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
186 Fein 5916/22 Chase 3/10/11 03/21/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/1/12 – loss mit
187 Fein 6026/11 Chase 3/11/11 03/23/11 No No No
188 Fein 6148/11 Chase 3/14/11 03/22/11 6/16/11
Filed by P
6/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 08/02/11
Answer filed 03/21/11Reply filed 03/30/11
Amended Reply filed 04/15/11
189 Fein 6454/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/29/11 No No No Answers (2) filed 04/07/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/6/12 – mtgreinstated
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
190 Fein 6525/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/28/11 No No No
191 Fein 6456/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/24/11 No No No192 Fein 6484/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/31/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 99/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 19
192 Fein 6484/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/31/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11
Notice of Claim filed 4/19/11
193 Fein 6485/11 Chase 3/16/11 03/23/11 No No No Answer filed 03/24/11
194 Fein 6589/11 Wilm. Trust 3/17/11 04/04/11 No No No Answer filed 04/07/11
195 Fein –
Atty Change
– Heath
Girinsky
4/8/11
6592/11 Chase 3/17/11 03/31/11 No No No Answer filed 04/04/11
196 Fein 6595/11 PNC Bank 3/17/11 03/30/11 8/9/11Filed by P
No Yes Answer filed 04/22/11Notice of Motion filed 8/9/11
Order signed 10/21/11
Stipulations filed 10/21/11
Notice of Entry filed 10/31/11
Verified Complaint filed 12/12/11H/o atty – Pankaj Malik 718-446-5755
197 Fein 6707/11 B of A 3/18/11 03/31/11 No No No Answer filed 6/21/11
Rejection of Answer filed 6/29/11
Affidavit of Service filed 7/26/11
198 Fein 6709/11 OneWest 3/18/11 03/29/11 No No No Rejection of Answer 5/19/11Verified Answer 6/24/11
Reply 7/5/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/11/11 - no reasonbut signed by both parties
199 Fein 6711/11 Chase 3/18/11 04/04/11 No No No
200 Fein 6823/11 JPMC 3/21/11 04/07/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 1/4/12 – no reason
201 Fein 6825/11 Chase 3/21/11 03/29/11 No No No Rejection of Answer filed 11/9/11
Answer and cross claim filed 11/14/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
202 Fein 6826/11 Chase 3/21/11 04/12/11 9/2/11
Filed by D
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
Answer filed 5/4/11Rejection of Answer filed 5/10/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 100/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 20
Rejection of Answer filed 5/10/11
Stipulation filed 6/23/11
Notice of Appearance filed 8/12/11Notice of Motion to Dismiss filed 9/2/11
203 Fein 6941/11 Chase 3/22/11 03/31/11 No No No
204 Fein 6945/11 Chase 3/22/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/19/11 – Fact
previously unknown to Plaintiff now known
205 Fein 6947/11 Flag Star 3/22/11 04/01/11 5/25/11Filed by P
5/25/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/12/11Reply (to what?) filed 04/25/11
Order Signed 1/18/12 – removed from FCP – D did
not qualify for a mod
H/o atty – The Wool Law Group
206 Fein 6948/11 Wells F 3/22/11 04/07/11 No No No
207 Fein 6971/11 Wells F 3/22/11 03/31/11 8/4/11Filed by P 8/4/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1
st
FSC held 09/14/11Order Signed 9/21/11 – removed from FCP as loan
is a construction loan
208 Fein 7167/11 Wells F 3/23/11 04/04/11 5/25/11
Filed by P
5/25/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/12/11
Answer filed 04/11/11
RJI filed on 5/25/11Order Signed 2/1/12 – Removed from FCP – D
failed to qualify for a mod
209 Fein 7253/11 Chase 3/24/11 03/31/11 No No No210 Fein 7252/11 Deutsche 3/24/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 7/20/11 – mtg
reinstated
211 Fein 7254/11 PNC Bank 3/24/11 04/04/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 2/8/12 – loss
mitigation
212 Fein 7255/11 OneWest 3/24/11 03/31/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/5/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/12/11 – loss
mitigation213 Fein 7445/11 Chase 3/25/11 04/05/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/12/11 – improper
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 101/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 21
p p p
service of RPAPL 1304 90-Day Notice
214 Fein 7448/11 OneWest 3/25/11 04/05/11 8/1/11Filed by D
No Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/13/11 and ongoingNotice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
Answer filed 6/17/11
Rejection of Answer filed 6/23/11
Notice of Motion to Ext. Time to Ans. filed 8/1/11Notice of Appearance filed 10/6/11
Notice of Motion filed 10/31/11
Order Granting Motion Signed 10/31/11
215 Fein 7568/11 OneWest 3/28/11 04/11/11 6/29/11
Filed by P
6/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 08/16/11 and ongoing
Reply filed 5/10/11Answer filed 7/14/11
216 Fein 7697/11 Aurora 3/29/11 04/07/11 10/17/11
Filed by P
10/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/29/11 and ongoing
Answer filed 04/18/11Reply filed 04/20/11
217 Fein 7823/11 OneWest 3/30/11 04/11/11 10/11/11
Filed by P
10/11/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/30/11 and ongoing
218 Fein 7824/11 OneWest 3/30/11 04/18/11 8/12/11Filed by P
8/12/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/28/11Order signed 1/18/12 – removed from FCP – D was
denied a mod
219 Fein 7825/11 OneWest 3/30/11 04/05/11 8/19/11Filed by P
8/19/11 Yes Not in ecourtsOrder signed 10/6/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s default
220 Fein 7935/11 Nationstar 3/31/11 04/11/11 No No No
221 Fein 7937/11 Chase 3/31/11 04/07/11 No No No Answer filed 04/18/11
Reply filed 04/20/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
222 Fein 8006/11 HSBC 3/31/11 04/19/11 No No No
223 Dorf 5251/11 Wells F 3/02/11 03/16/11 No No No Answer filed 04/01/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 8/2/11 - no reason
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 102/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 22
p
224 Dorf 5252/11 HSBC 3/02/11 03/24/11 No No No
225 Dorf 5253/11 HSBC 3/02/11 03/16/11 No No No Answer filed 03/30/11
Reply filed 04/18/11
226 Dorf 5369/11 Wells F 3/03/11 04/08/11 11/3/11
Filed by P
11/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/23/11
Order Signed 1/5/11 – removed from FCP due to D
default
227 Dorf 5371/11 HSBC 3/03/11 03/21/11 No No No Answer filed 03/24/11
228 Dorf 5454/11 Wells F 3/04/11 03/24/11 No No No
229 Dorf 6328/11 Deutsche 3/15/11 04/04/11 No No No
230 Dorf 6479/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 04/11/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11
231 Dorf 6482/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 03/30/11 No No No Answer filed 04/08/11
232 Dorf 6483/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 06/15/11 No No No Answer filed 04/05/11
Reply filed 4/26/11
233 Dorf 6740/11 BNY 3/18/11 03/30/11 7/14/11Filed by P
7/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/01/11Ecourts reflects h/o found not eligible 02/10/12Ecourts reflects P filed Mtn to Appt Ref 02/29/12
234 Dorf 7451/11 HSBC 3/25/11 04/07/11 No No No
235 Dorf 7600/11 HSBC 3/28/11 04/14/11 9/16/11Filed by P
9/26/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 10/28/11Ecourts reflects loan mod on 03/02/12
Answer filed 04/15/11
Discovery requests filed (why?) 04/15/11
Reply to counterclaims filed 5/9/11H/o atty – Sol Mermelstein 718-436-8098
236 Dorf 7602/11 BNY 3/28/11 04/06/11 11/9/11
Filed by P
11/9/11 Yes
237 Dorf 7603/11 Deutsche 3/28/11 04/18/11 No No No
238 Dorf 7801/11 HSBC 3/30/11 04/13/11 No No No
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
239 Frenkel 5321/11 Deutsche 3/03/11 04/06/11 7/15/11
Filed by P
7/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 08/29/11, but h/o
defaultedOrder Signed 9/8/11 – removed from FCP due to D
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 103/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 23
default
240 Frenkel 5365/11 Deutsche 3/03/11 03/16/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11
241 Frenkel 6024/11 Deutsche 3/11/11 5/9/11 No No No Answers filed 3/18/11 & 3/31/11
242 Frenkel 6152/11 Deutsche 3/14/11 03/31/11 2/3/12Filed by P
2/3/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 03/14/12, but h/odefaulted
243 Frenkel 6565/11 Deutsche 3/17/11 03/29/11 10/7/11
Filed by P
10/7/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/23/11 and ongoing
Notice of Appearance filed 12/13/11
H/o atty – Luz A. Lizarazo 914-385-0292
244 Frenkel 6608/11 OneWest 3/17/11 04/06/11 No No No Answer filed 4/29/11
Reply filed 5/4/11
245 Frenkel 6916/11 B of A 3/22/11 04/13/11 No No No
246 Frenkel 6917/11 BAC 3/22/11 03/30/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 10/20/11 - no reason
247 Frenkel 6964/11 OneWest 3/22/11 03/30/11 10/7/11Filed by P
11/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/23/11, but h/odefaulted
Order signed 11/29/11 – removed from FCP due toD default
248 Druckman 5325/11 Wells F 3/03/11 03/18/11 No No No
249 Druckman 5680/11 Wells F 3/08/11 04/01/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11
250 Druckman 7696/11 Wells F 3/29/11 4/29/11 No No No
251 Steine –
Atty Change – Knuckles1/10/12
5074/11 Flagstar 3/01/11 03/24/11 6/30/11
Filed by D
No Yes Notice of Motion filed 6/30/11
Ecourts reflects Mtn to Ext. Time to Ans. 07/06/11Stipulation & Motion withdrawn 8/9/11Answer filed 8/12/11
Stipulation So Ordered filed 10/3/11
H/o atty – Alice A. Nicholson 800-323-3024
252 Steine 5704/11 Chase 3/08/11 04/04/11 No No No
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
253 Steine
Atty Change – Knuckles
5817/11 Flagstar 3/09/11 04/04/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/19/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 104/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 24
12/28/11
254 Steine 6476/11 Flagstar 3/16/11 05/09/11 8/2/11
Filed by P
11/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 12/13/11 and ongoing
Answer filed 04/12/11
Notice of Appearance filed 5/11/11H/o atty – Kenneth Lituack 718-428-4806
255 Steine 7732/11 Freedom 3/29/11 04/11/11 11/15/11
Filed by P
11/22/11 Yes Ecourts reflects motion filed 07/12/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11Notice of Motion filed 11/22/11
Affirmation in Opposition filed 1/25/11Memo Decision filed 1/25/11
Order of Reference filed 1/26/11
256 Weinreb 5250/11 US Bank 3/02/11 03/21/11 7/7/11
Filed by P
6/30/11 Yes Order of Reference filed 8/1/11
Notice of Entry filed 8/26/11
Judgment of Foreclosure filed 11/4/11Notice of Entry 11/29/11
257 Weinreb –
Atty Change
– Katz
8/1/11
5818/11 BNY 3/09/11 04/07/11 No No No Answer filed 04/12/11
258 Weinreb 5820/11 Deutsche 3/09/11 03/21/11 8/8/11
Filed by P
8/2/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 09/20/11
Notice of Appearance filed 4/16/11
Answer filed 5/13/11Order Signed 11/16/11 – removed from FCP
because unable to settle
259 Weinreb 6613/11 US Bank 3/17/11 04/05/11 6/21/11
Filed by P
6/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects Mtn to Appt Ref filed 06/21/11
Memo Decision and received papers filed 7/13/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
260 Weinreb 6742/11 Wells F 3/18/11 04/04/11 No No No
261 Weinreb 7802/11 Deutsche 3/30/11 04/14/11 9/9/11Filed by P
9/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 11/04/11Notices of Appearance filed 4/15/11 & 4/25/11
O d Si d 11/16/11 d f FCP d
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 105/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 25
Order Signed 11/16/11 – removed from FCP due toD default
262 Weinreb –
Atty Change
– Hinshaw
5/10/11
7803/11 Deutsche 3/30/11 04/14/11 No No No Answer filed 5/4/11
Reply filed 6/7/11
Stipulation & Affirmation filed 7/28/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue as against one defendant
filed 7/28/11 - discontinued with prejudice signedby P and D
263 Stein 6716/11 US Bank 3/18/11 03/23/11 10/3/11
Filed by P
10/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/04/12
Answer filed 03/24/11
Notice of Appearance filed 11/14/11Demand filed 11/14/11
Order Signed 1/11/12 – removed from FCP due to
D default264 Stein 7115/11 OneWest 3/23/11 04/05/11 10/3/11
Filed by P
10/3/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 11/23/11 and indicates
a TPPEcourts reflects a loan mod as of 02/01/12
Answer filed 04/07/11
Notice of Appearance filed 12/13/11
265 Stein 7819/11 OneWest 3/30/11 04/05/11 No No No
266 Stein 7952/11 FFreedom 3/31/11 04/27/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
267 Berkman 5284/11 Green Tree 3/03/11 03/23/11 6/9/11Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts reflects Mtn for Order of Ref filed 06/14/11Papers Received 6/27/11
Order Signed 6/27/11
268 Berkman 7053/11 Suntrust 3/23/11 04/18/11 No No No Answer filed 04/19/11
Reply filed 5/12/11
269 Berkman 7285/11 Cent Mtg 3/24/11 04/06/11 No No No
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
270 Katz 5189/11 US Bank 3/02/11 03/16/11 10/20/11
Filed by P
10/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC on 12/07/11, and also
indicates a loan modH/o atty – Valarie Hawkins 516-292-0984
271 K t 6475/11 D t h 3/16/11 03/29/11 12/29/11 12/29/11 Y
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 106/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 26
271 Katz 6475/11 Deutsche 3/16/11 03/29/11 12/29/11Filed by P
12/29/11 Yes
272 Katz 7607/11 Wells F 3/28/11 04/04/11 10/25/11Filed by P
10/25/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 12/15/11Notices of Appearance filed 5/13/11 & 12/22/11
273 Katz 7992/11 Deutsche 3/31/11 04/12/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 6/2/11
274 Stagg 7742/11 Mid-Island 3/29/11 12/09/11 04/01/11
Filed by P
4/1/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 05/09/11
Answer filed 04/19/11
Reply Filed 5/29/11Notice of Motion to Discontinue filed 6/1/11 &
7/20/11
Order Signed 10/26/11Notice of Entry filed 11/10/11
Amended Verified Complaint filed 11/10/11Notice of Appearance Filed 1/26/11
275 Stagg 7743/11 Mid-Island 3/29/11 04/01/11 No No No
276 De Rose 6012/11 PDL Bank 3/11/11 03/23/11 No No No
277 De Rose 6013/11 US Bank 3/11/11 03/25/11 5/26/11Filed by P
5/26/11 Yes Papers Received & Order Signed 6/14/11Ecourts reflects that P’s Mtn to Appoint a Referee
was denied on 06/22/11 and the case was sent to the
FCP, but it does not appear that FSCs have been
held in the intervening 9 months278 De Rose 6370/11 Deutsche 3/15/11 03/25/11 04/20/11
Filed by D5/4/11 Yes Homeowner filed RJI in conjunction with an OSC
seeking an injunction. A plaintiffs’ class action
firm represents h/o.
Judge’s Memo on OSC filed 5/11/11Judge’s Memo on Second OSC 10/3/11 – enjoined
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
P from proceeding as conference required, but no
FSCs held yetH/o atty – Squitters & Fearon, LLP 212-421-6492
279 De Rose 6371/11 Deutsche 3/15/11 03/25/11 No No No Aff/Stip of Discontinuance filed 04/18/11 myg
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 107/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 27
279 De Rose 6371/11 Deutsche 3/15/11 03/25/11 No No No Aff/Stip. of Discontinuance filed 04/18/11 - mygreinstated
280 De Rose –
Atty Change
– Blank
Rome
11/22/11
6373/11 HSBC 3/15/11 04/12/11 No No No Answer filed 6/9/11
Reply filed 9/7/11
Notices of Appearance filed 9/7/11, 10/27/11 &
11/22/11
Notice of Address Change filed 9/26/11Notice of Motion filed 10/4/11
Preliminary Conference Ordered 10/27/11Answer filed 12/13/11
Reply filed 12/30/11
281 Sheldon 7598/11 Wells F 3/28/11 04/21/11 5/9/11
Filed by P
5/9/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/01/11, but h/o
defaulted
Order Signed 7/25/11 – removed from FCP due toD’s default
282 Sheldon 7599/11 Wells F 3/28/11 04/13/11 4/28/11Filed by P
4/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects first FSC held on 6/13/11Answer filed 5/26/11
Order signed 6/17/11 – removed from FCP due to
D’s default
283 Cohn 5788/11 BNY 3/09/11 04/18/11 6/1/11
Filed by P
6/27/11 Yes Ecourts reflects that P filed Mtn to Appoint a
Referee on 06/17/11 and that a traverse hearing was
ordered 03/06/12Answer filed 6/10/11
Papers Received 6/27/11Order Signed 6/27/11
Affirmation filed 6/27/11
Notice of Motion filed 10/21/11
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
284 Cohn 7581/11 TD Bank 3/28/11 04/21/11 04/21/11
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 06/14/11
Notice of Appearance filed 5/17/11Judge’s Memo & Papers Received 7/8/11
Ecourts reflects loan mod on 07/19/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 108/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 28
Ecourts reflects loan mod on 07/19/11
Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 9/30/11 - mtg paid off
285 Sweeney 7730/11 CitiCorp 3/29/11 04/01/11 No No No Answer filed 4/27/11
286 Rosenblum 7655/11 Flatbush SL 3/29/11 04/07/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 4/26/11
287 Weltman –
Attny
Change –
Elliot S.Schissel
6/13/11
7068/11 UNFCU 3/24/11 05/20/11 5/20/11
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 07/27/11, but that on
08/17/11, case deemed “not eligible”
Answer filed 4/28/11
Reply 5/16/11Order Signed 8/30/11
Memo Decision filed 11/7/11
Notice of Entry filed 11/15/11Order Signed 1/23/12
Notice of Entry filed 1/26/11
Receiver appointed 02/10/12H/o atty – Elliot S. Schlissel 516-516-6645
288 Hiscock 6640/11 Bayview 3/17/11 04/18/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 5/3/11Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/23/11 - mtg paid
off
289 Knuckles 5810/11 Wilmington 3/09/11 03/17/11 9/19/11
Filed by P
9/19/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 10/31/11 and ongoing
Answer filed 03/18/11
Notice of Appearance 12/21/11
Order Signed 1/18/11 – removed from FCP becausecase not settled
290 Donato 5543/11 BNB Bank 3/07/11 03/28/11 6/15/11
Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Motion filed 6/15/11
Memo Decision 9/7/11
OSC filed 11/15/11
OSC withdrawn 1/30/12
Queens County – March 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourts
Record
Other
291 Solomon 5413/11 BB&T Mtg 3/04/11 03/23/11 No No No
292 Herzfeld – Atty Change
Vernick
5374/11 Bayview 3/03/11 03/24/11 5/2/11Filed by P
No Yes Order Signed 11/16/11 - ???Order of Reference & received papers filed
12/20/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 109/134
Last ReviewedApril 17, 2012 29
– Vernick 5/11/11
12/20/11
293 Roach 5053/11 HSBC 3/01/11 03/10/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 11/1/11 – no reason
294 Davidson 5082/11 Deutsche 3/01/11 03/07/11 No No No Stip/Aff to Discontinue filed 5/17/11 – no reason
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 110/134
APPENDIX F
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
1. Baum
Atty Change GPO
12/27/11
22313/11 Wells Fargo 10/3/11 10/24/11 11/30/11
Filed by P
11/30/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/13/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 111/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 1
2. Baum
Atty Change
Frenkel12/20/11
22317/11 Deutsche 10/3/11 10/19/11 12/1/11
Filed by P
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 11/1/11
Ecourts: First FCP 2/10/12
3. Baum
Atty ChangeSweeny
1/19/12
22443/11 Citimtg 10/4/11 11/1/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 11/1/11 &
11/9/11
4. Baum
Atty Change
McCabe
12/15/11
23718/11 M&T 10/20/11 11/14/11 No No No Filed as Pillar
Answer filed 11/9/11Reply filed 11/29/11
5. Baum –
Atty Change
Fein1/20/12
23719/11 Aurora 10/20/11 11/14/11 No No No Filed as Pillar
Answer filed 11/22/11
6. Baum –
Atty Change
Frenkel
12/5/11
24535/11 Wells F 10/28/11 11/30/11 No No No
7. Baum – Atty Change
Rosicki
12/5/11
24600/11 Wells F 10/31/11 11/21/11 No No No Answer filed on 11/17/11
8. Fein 22508/11 PNC 10/5/11 10/14/11 1/31/12
Filed by P
1/31/11 Yes Answer filed on 1/13/12
Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/10/12
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
9. Fein 23547/11 GMAC 10/18/11 11/18/11 1/13/12
Filed by P
1/13/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/3/12
10. Fein 24038/11 LNV 10/24/11 11/18/11 1/17/12
Filed by P
No Yes S&C Filed by Fein Such but RJI filed by
Rosicki; ecourts lists Rosicki as counsel but
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 112/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 2
y
no change of attny filed
Answer filed 1/18/12
Notice of Substitution of counsel filed by DAurora on 1/19/12
11. Fein 24298/11 GMAC 10/26/11 11/18/11 12/20/11Filed by P
12/20/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/28/12
12. Fein 24397/11 Wells F 10/27/11 11/4/11 No No No
13. Rosicki 22422 US Bank 10/4/11 10/20/11 1/25/11
Filed by P
No Yes Motion coverpage filed by P on 1/25/12
Ecourts doesn’t list an FCP conference
Ecourts: Motion fully submitted 3/2/12
14. Rosicki 22876/11 Citimtg 10/7/11 10/24/11 No No No Answer filed 11/7/11
Reply filed 11/9/1115. Rosicki 22854/11 Chase 10/7/11 10/24/11 No No No Answer filed 10/26/11
Reply filed 11/10/11
16. Rosicki 23144/11 Aurora 10/12/11 10/25/11 12/27/11
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/28/12
17. Rosicki 23145/11 Nationstar 10/12/11 11/21/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed on 11/15/11 &
11/28/11
18. Rosicki 23241/11 Chase 10/13/11 10/26/11 No No No Answer filed 10/26/11
19. Rosicki 23540/11 Chase 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No20. Rosicki 23952/11 Chase 10/21/11 11/16/11 No No No
21. Rosicki 23951/11 Chase 10/21/11 12/5/11 No No No
22. Rosicki 23950/11 MetLife 10/21/11 11/16/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/18/11
23. Rosicki 23949/11 BofA 10/21/11 11/3/11 No No No
24. Rosicki 23903/11 Chase 10/21/11 11/16/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/12/11
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
25. Rosicki 23906/11 Freedom 10/21/11 11/18/11 No No Yes Answer filed 12/1/11
Ecourts: First FCP 6/12/1226. Rosicki 23905/11 US Bank 10/21/11 11/17/11 No No No Answer filed on 11/14/11
Notice of Appearance filed on 11/18/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 113/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 3
27. Rosicki 23953/11 US Bank 10/21/11 11/23/11 1/26/12
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts: First FCP 3/28/12
28. Rosicki 24244/11 Citimtg 10/25/11 11/15/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/5/11
29. Rosicki 24243/11 Chase 10/25/11 11/16/11 No No No
30. Rosicki 24339/11 Chase 10/26/11 11/4/11 No No No
31. Rosicki 24442/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/4/11 12/16/11
Filed by P
12/16/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP 3/28/12
32. Rosicki 24443/11 Chase 10/27/11 11/15/11 No No No Answer filed 11/28/11
33. Rosicki 24553/11 Chase 10/28/11 11/14/11 No No No Supplemental S&C filed 11/3/11
Notice of Pendency Amended 11/3/11
Notice of Appearance filed 11/22/11
Answer filed 12/14/11
Reply filed 1/19/12Aff of Service filed 1/19/12
34. Rosicki 24552/11 Freedom 10/28/11 12/16/11 No No No
35. Rosicki 24605/11 Deutsche 10/31/11 12/5/11 No No No Answer filed 11/14/11
Reply filed 11/29/11
36. Rosicki 24606/11 Chase 10/31/11 11/14/11 No No No Answer filed 11/16/11
37. Shapiro 22334/11 US National 10/3/11 10/12/11 11/17/11Filed by P
11/17/11 No Ecourts: First FCP conference 2/15/12
38. Shapiro 21631/11 Wells F 10/4/11 10/17/11 No No No39. Shapiro 22713/11 US Bank 10/6/11 10/25/11 11/23/11
Filed by P11/23/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 1/10/12
40. Shapiro 22696/11 Chase 10/6/11 12/14/11 No No No
41. Shapiro 22685/11 Wells F 10/6/11 10/24/11 11/29/11
Filed by P
11/29/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP Conference 1/10/12
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
42. Shapiro 22866/11 Chase 10/7/11 11/4/11 No No No
43. Shapiro 23344/11 Chase 10/14/11 10/20/11 No No No Answer filed 11/23/11Reply filed 12/9/11
44. Shapiro 23353/11 Deutsche 10/14/11 11/1/11 No No No Reply filed 11/29/11 (answer was not filed)
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 114/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 4
45. Shapiro 23440/11 US Bank 10/17/11 12/20/11 1/6/12
Filed by P
1/6/12 Yes Notice of pendency filed 1/12/12
Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/27/12
46. Shapiro 23798/11 Chase 10/20/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed 11/10/11
Reply filed 12/9/11
47. Shapiro 23919/11 HSBC 10/21/11 1/4/12 1/12/12
Filed by P
1/12/12 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 11/17/11
Notice of Pendency filed 2/14/11Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/17/12
48. Shapiro 23936/11 HSBC 10/21/11 10/31/11 12/29/11Filed by P
12/29/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/20/11
49. Shapiro 24092/11 Chase 10/24/11 11/1/11 No No No
50. Shapiro 24413/11 Chase 10/27/11 2/6/12 No No No Answer filed 11/10/11
Reply filed 11/29/11
51.
Shapiro 24537/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/25/11 1/12/12Filed by P 1/12/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/27/12
52. Shapiro 24536/11 Chase 10/28/11 12/2/11 1/6/12Filed by D
No Yes Motion coverpage to disiss filed by D on1/10/12
53. Leopold 22491/11 HSBC 10/5/11 11/1/11 No No No
54. Leopold 22490/11 Deutsche 10/5/11 10/27/11 12/27/11
Filed by D
No Yes Motion coverpage for summary judgment
filed by D on 12/27/11
55. Leopold 22489/11 Wells Fargo 10/5/11 10/17/11 No No No
56. Leopold 22488/11 Wells Fargo 10/5/11 12/6/11 No No No Answer filed 11/14/11Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11
57. Leopold 23352/11 Deutsche 10/14/11 10/14/11 No No No
58. Leopold 23875/11 Wells Fargo 10/21/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed 11/14/11
Amended Answer filed 12/7/11
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
59. McCabe 22299/11 Wells F 10/3/11 11/14/11 No No No Reply filed 11/15/11 (answer not filed)
Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/1160. McCabe 22431/11 BofA 10/4/11 10/29/11 No No No Third Party Authorization filed 10/24/11
61. McCabe 22546/11 Bank of NY 10/5/11 10/29/11 No No No
62 M C b 22545/11 B k f NY 10/5/11 10/29/11 N N N
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 115/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 5
62. McCabe 22545/11 Bank of NY 10/5/11 10/29/11 No No No
63. McCabe 22302/11 BofA 10/3/11 12/13/11 No No No Answer filed 10/18/11 & 11/3/11
64. McCabe 22300/11 Bank of NY 10/3/11 11/23/11 No No No
65. McCabe 22724/11 Deutsche 10/6/11 10/29/11 No No No
66. McCabe 22725/11 US Bank 10/6/11 10/29/11 11/30/11
Filed by D
No Yes Motion coverpage for dismissal filed by D on
12/1/11
67. McCabe 22868/11 US Bank 10/7/11 10/29/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 10/31/11
68. McCabe 22867/11 US Bank 10/7/11 11/18/11 No No No
69. McCabe 22982/11 GMAC 10/11/11 12/2/11 No No No
70. McCabe 22979/11 Citibank 3/14/11 3/30/11 No No No
71. McCabe 22981/11 Aurora 10/11/11 12/16/11 2/7/12Filed by P
2/7/12 Yes Answer filed 11/14/11Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/22/12
72. McCabe 23125/11 Bank of NY 10/12/11 10/27/11 2/14/12Filed by P
2/14/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/15/12
73. McCabe 23124/11 Bank of NY 10/12/11 10/27/11 No No No
74. McCabe 23449/11 Bank of NY 10/17/11 11/4/11 No No No Answer filed 10/31/11
Notice of Appearance filed 11/18/11
75. McCabe 23538/11 US Bank 10/18/11 11/14/11 No No No Stip/Affirm to Discontinue filed on 1/6/12 –
no reason
76. McCabe 23659/11 Deutsche 10/19/11 11/4/11 No No No
77. McCabe 23788/11 Deutsche 10/20/11 11/15/11 No No No Notice of Appearance & Answer filed11/28/11Demand for Documents filed 11/28/11
Reply filed 12/9/11
78. McCabe 24074/11 Bank of NY 10/24/11 11/9/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/22
Answer filed 11/29/11
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
79. McCabe 24073/11 Deutsche 10/24/11 11/17/11 2/9/12
Filed by P
2/9/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/2/12
80. McCabe 24077/11 BofA 10/24/11 No No No No
81. McCabe 24079/11 Wells Fargo 10/24/11 11/17/11 No No No Answer filed on 11/17/11
82 M C b 24191/11 HSBC 10/25/11 11/21/11 2/9/11 2/9/11 Y E t Fi t FCP f 5/2/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 116/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 6
82. McCabe 24191/11 HSBC 10/25/11 11/21/11 2/9/11
Filed by P
2/9/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/2/12
83. McCabe 24326/11 BofA 10/26/11 11/21/11 3/12/12
Filed by P
3/12/12 Yes Answer filed 11/23/11
Amended answer filed 12/13/11
Notice of Appearance filed 12/16/11
Reply filed 12/16/11Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/2/11
84. McCabe 24541/11 Bank of NY 10/28/11 11/15/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/29/11
Reply filed 12/2/11 (no answer filed)
85. McCabe 24615/11 Bank of NY 10/31/11 12/13/11 No No No Answer filed on 12/12/11
86. Frenkel 22824/11 BofA 10/7/11 1/20/12 2/16/12
Filed by P
2/16/16 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/15/12
87.
Frenkel 22985/11 ReverseMtg Soltns 10/11/11 11/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11Answer filed 1/13/12
88. Frenkel 22983/11 One West 10/11/11 10/19/11 No No No Answer filed 10/25/11
89. Frenkel 22984/11 One West 10/11/11 10/20/11 No No No Answer filed 1/13/12
90. Frenkel 22961/11 Capital One 10/11/11 10/20/11 No No No Reply filed 11/29/11 (no answer filed)Consent to Change D’s atty filed on 12/14/11
Verified reply filed on 12/22/11
91. Frenkel 23236/11 Wells Fargo 10/13/11 10/24/11 No No No
92. Frenkel 23239/11 Wells Fargo 10/13/11 11/2/11 No No No Notice of Appearance 11/7/1193. Frenkel 23240/11 One West 10/13/11 10/27/11 No No No
94. Frenkel 23297/11 Deutsche 10/14/11 11/19/11 1/12/11
Filed by P
1/12/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/3/12
95. Frenkel 23414/11 Bank of NY 10/17/11 10/27/11 No No No
96. Frenkel 23450/11 Reverse 10/17/11 12/30/11 No No No
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Mtg Soltn
97. Frenkel 23451/11 ReverseMtg Soltn
10/17/11 10/28/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 11/17/11 &11/28/11
98. Frenkel 23502/11 BofA 10/18/11 10/28/11 12/22/11
Filed by P
12/22/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/20/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 117/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 7
Filed by P
99. Frenkel 23501/11 Bank of NY 10/18/11 11/3/11 3/9/12
Filed by P
3/9/12 Yes Answer filed 1/11/12
Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/17/12
100. Frenkel 23503/11 Bank of NY 10/18/11 10/27/11 2/7/12
Filed by P
2/7/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/22/12
101. Frenkel 23505/11 Bank of NY 10/18/11 10/31/11 3/9/12Filed by P
3/9/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/25/11
102. Frenkel 23655/11 Midfirst 10/19/11 10/28/11 1/5/12Filed by P
1/5/12 Yes Notice of Appearance filed 11/17/11Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/28/11
103. Frenkel 24193/11 One West 10/25/11 11/9/11 2/29/12Filed by P
2/29/12 Yes Answer filed 11/14/11Ecourts: Return Date of Motion 3/22/12
104. Frenkel 24194/11 Wells Fargo 10/25/11 11/3/11 No No No Reply filed 12/5/11 (answer not filed)
105. Frenkel 24323/11 One West 10/26/11 11/15/11 No No No Stip to Discontinue filed 12/22/11 – no reason106. Frenkel 24324/11 Midfirst 10/26/11 11/21/11 1/19/12
Filed by P
1/19/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/16/12
107. Frenkel 24406/11 BofA 10/27/11 11/9/11 2/7/12
Filed by P
2/7/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/22/11
108. Frenkel 24405/11 Bank of NY 10/27/11 11/22/11 2/7/12
Filed by P
2/7/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/22/12
109. Frenkel 24622/11 BofA 10/31/11 11/21/11 2/2/12
Filed by P
2/2/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/11/12
110. Sweeny 22322/11 Citibank 10/3/11 10/26/11 12/7/11Filed byD
No Yes Motion filed by D to dismiss on 12/7/11
111. Sweeny 22356/11 Citimtg 10/4/11 10/12/11 No No No Answer filed 11/18/11
112. Sweeny 22357/11 Citimtg 10/4/11 11/10/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 10/31/11,
11/7/11, 11.9/11 & 11/18/11
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Answer filed 11/4/11
113. Sweeny 22519/11 Citimtg 10/5/11 10/14/11 No No No114. Sweeny 22879/11 Citimtg 10/7/11 2/6/12 No No No
115. Sweeny 23647/11 Citimtg 10/19/11 11/3/11 No No No Answer filed 11/22/11
116 Sweeny 23769/11 Citimtg 10/20/11 11/9/11 No No No
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 118/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 8
116. Sweeny 23769/11 Citimtg 10/20/11 11/9/11 No No No
117. Sweeny 23770/11 Citimtg 10/20/11 10/26/11 No No No
118. Stiene 22947/11 Chase 10/11/11 12/20/11 No No No
119. Stiene 23997/11 Chase 10/24/11 11/9/11 No No No Answers filed 11/28/11 & 12/13/11
120. Stein 22520/11 Everbank 10/5/11 10/19/11 1/26/12Filed by P
1/26/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/10/12
121. Stein 23126/11 One West 10/12/11 12/13/11 No No No Notice of pendency re-filed on 11/16/11
122. Stein 23460/11 One West 10/17/11 10/26/11 No No No
123. Stein 23574/11 US Bank 10/18/11 1/9/12 1/26/12
Filed by P
1/26/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 4/4/12
124. Stein 24632/11 One West 10/31/11 12/2/11 1/11/12
Filed bu P
1/11/212 Yes Motion for order of reference filed by P on
1/11/12
Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/27/12125. Derose 22544/11 BofA 10/5/11 10/26/11 No No No
126. Derose 23340/11 Wells Fargo 10/14/11 10/28/11 No No No Stip to Discontinue filed 12/22/11 – no reason
127. Berkman 23601/11 Wells Fargo 10/19/11 11/4/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/18/11
128. Druckman 22509/11 Bank ofNY 10/5/11 No No No No
129. Druckman 22700/11 Bank of NY 10/6/11 11/10/11 No No No Notice of pendency re-filed 1/4/12
Notice of Appearance filed 1/17/12
130. Druckman 22826/11 BofA 10/7/11 11/10/11 No No No
131. Druckman 22831/11 Bank of NY 10/7/11 11/10/11 No No No
132. Druckman 22865/11 Bank of NY 10/7/11 11/1/11 No No No
133. Druckman 22858/11 HSBC 10/7/11 11/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 11/17/11
134. Druckman 22859/11 Bank of NY 10/7/11 10/31/11 No No No
135. Druckman 22959/11 US Bank 10/11/11 11/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/14/11
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
136. Druckman 23097/11 BofA 10/12/11 12/2/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed on 12/1/11
137. Druckman 23092/11 Bank of NY 10/12/11 10/25/11 1/13/12Filed by D
No Yes Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11Answer filed 11/15/11
Reply filed 12/6/11Motion filed by D on 1/13/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 119/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 9
Motion filed by D on 1/13/12
Ecourts: Motion return date 2/8/12
138. Druckman 23642/11 Bank of NY 10/19/11 11/10/11 No No No Notice of Appearance 11/18/11
139. Druckman 24310/11 Bank of NY 10/26/11 11/22/11 No No No Answer filed 12/2/11
140. Druckman 24309/11 Bank of NY 10/26/11 11/7/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/7/11
141. Druckman 24427/11 Bank of NY 10/27/11 11/22/11 3/9/12Filed by P
2/17/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/1/12
142. Druckman 24428/11 HSBC 10/27/11 11/22/11 No No No
143. Druckman 24539/11 BofA 10/28/11 11/22/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 12/12/11
144. Katz 22316/11 Deutsche 10/3/11 10/19/11 No No No
145. Katz 22318/11 Deutsche 10/3/11 10/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11
146. Katz 22433/11 HSBC 10/4/11 10/17/11 3/8/12
Filed by P
No Yes Motion coverpage filed 3/9/12
Ecourts: Motion return date 5/14/12147. Katz 22796/11 Deutsche 10/7/11 No No No No
148. Katz 23235/11 HSBC 10/13/11 11/25/11 No No No Notices of Appearance filed 11/4/11 &
11/10/11Reply filed 11/9/11 (no answer filed)
149. Katz 23447/11 Wells Fargo 10/17/11 11/3/11 12/28/11Filed by P
12/2811 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/13/12
150. Katz 24325/11 ING Bank 10/26/11 11/9/11 No No No
151. Katz 24420/11 US Bank 10/27/11 12/22/11 No No No152. Roach 22990/11 Deutsche 10/11/11 10/29/11 No No No Answer filed 12/17/11
153. Roach 24034/11 US Bank 10/24/11 11/17/11 No No No
154. Roach 24035/11 HSBC 10/24/11 11/29/11 No No No
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
155. Roach 24036/11 Wells Fargo 10/24/11 11/9/11 No No No Answer filed 11/15/11
156. Roach 24473/11 Bank of NY 10/28/11 11/30/11 No No No157. Schlesinger 22344/11 Flushing 10/3/11 1/9/12 3/2/12
Filed by P
No Yes Order to Show Cause Coverpage filed 4/17/12
Notice of Appearance filed 4/10/12
Motion coverpage filed by P on 3/2/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 120/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 10
Motion coverpage filed by P on 3/2/12
Notice of Appearance filed 11/17/11Ecourts: Motion Return Date 3/23/12
158. Schiller 23786/11 MT bank 10/20/11 11/14/11 3/19/12
Filed by P
3/19/12 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/16/12
159. Schiller 24071/11 M&T 10/24/11 1/30/12 No No No Notice of Appearance Filed 11/28/11
160. Knuckles 23604/11 Citibank 10/19/11 11/9/11 No No No Answer filed 11/23/11Reply filed 12/19/11
161. Knuckles 24147/11 Citibank 10/25/11 12/14/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/28/11
Notice of pendency re-filed 12/8/11
162. May 23351/11 Wells Fargo 10/14/11 11/2/11 No No No
163. May 23752/11 Wells Fargo 10/20/11 11/21/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/28/11
164. Zucker 22710/11 Mtg & RealEstate &
Income
Fund
10/6/11 1/27/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/23/11Answer filed 12/9/11
165. Guy 22986/11 Nationstar 10/11/11 10/24/11 No No No Answer filed 10/18/11
166. Robinowtiz 23167/11 Tuthill
Finance
10/13/11 11/4/11 1/12/12
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/16/12
167. Masone 23169/11 Maspeth
Fed Savings
10/13/11 1/11/12 2/14/11
Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 5/8/12
168. Hiscock 23251/11 Bayview 10/13/11 12/27/12 No No No Notice of pendency re-filed 11/23/11
169. Scarinci 23382/11 Capital Plus 10/17/11 2/7/12 No No No Answers filed 12/5/11 & 12/23/11
Notice of Appearance filed 1/5/12
170. Kosterich 23787/11 Waterfall 10/20/11 11/15/11 12/19/11 No Yes Motion filed by P on 12/19/11
Kings County –October 2011
Firm Index # Bank Date
Filed
Aff of
Service
RJI DD Aff Ecourt
Record
Other
Victoria
Fund
Filed by P Ecourts: Motion return date 3/28/12
171. Davidson 23817/11 Bank of NY 10/20/11 1/11/12 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 11/15/11
172. Bonchonsky 23888/11 US Bank 10/21/11 12/15/11 No No No Answer filed 11/16/11
Reply filed 11/30/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 121/134
Last Reviewed Arpil 17, 2012 11
Reply filed 11/30/11
173. Butler 24006/11 Chase 10/24/11 No No No No Stip to Discontinue filed 11/22/11 –
homeowner re-executed mortgage documents
174. Cohen 24540/11 US Bank 10/28/11 11/18/11 11/18/11
Filed by P
11/18/11 Yes Ecourts: First FCP conference 3/21/12
175. Simon 24571/11 Bank of NY 10/31/11 12/7/11 1/30/12
Filed by P
No Yes Motion filed by P on 2/1/12
Ecourts: Return Date for Motion 2/27/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 122/134
APPENDIX G
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
1. Baum
Atty Change
- Rosiki01/20/12
23492/11 Everbank 10/13/11 10/28/11 No No No Answer and NOA filed 11/09/11 byMansour (?)
2. Baum
Atty Change
23736/11 GMAC 10/17/11 11/07/11 No No No
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 123/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 1
– Berkman
12/14/11
3. Baum
Atty Change
– Fein Such01/30/12
23737/11 Metlife 10/17/11 No No No No
4. Baum
Atty Change
– Knuckler
01/24/12
23855/11 Deutsche 10/18/11 11/02/11 No No No
5. Baum
Atty Change – Fein Such
01/26/12
24069/11 Aurora 10/20/11 11/07/11 No No No
6. Baum
Atty Change – McCabe12/07/11
24252/11 Wells F 10/24/11 11/09/11 No No No NOA and “Demand” filed by h/o’s atty
01/17/12
7. Baum
Atty Change – Fein Such
12/21/11
24253 Wells F 10/14/11 11/07/11 No No No
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
8. Baum 24254/11 US Bank 10/24/11 11/09/11 11/29/11Filed by P
11/29/11 Yes Answer filed 01/10/12 by h/o attyNOA filed 01/25/12 by h/o atty
Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 01/18/119. Baum
Atty Change
– Rosicki
24388/11 Deutsche 10/25/11 11/07/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/22/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 124/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 2
12/20/11
10. Baum 24677/11 FannieMae
10/28/11 11/14/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty on 12/01/11Other Ds file NOAs 11/28/11 and 11/29/11
USA file NOA 12/12/11
P filed Reply to Counterclaims 12/08/1111. Sweeney 22754/11 CitiMtg 10/03/11 10/11/11 No No No Notice of Appearance filed 10/13/11
12. Sweeney 22755/11 Citibank 10/03/11 10/11/11 12/12/11
Filed by D
No No OSC for leave to intervene filed 12/12/11
13. Sweeney 22852/11 CitiMtg 10/04/11 10/11/11 No No No Answer and NOA filed by h/o atty on
12/07/11Notice of discontinuance filed 12/23/11 –
no reason provided; signed by h/o’s atty14. Sweeney 22853/11 Citibank 10/04/11 10/21/11 No No No Notice of discontinuance filed 01/06/12 –
no reason provided; only signed by
Sweeney
15. Sweeney
Atty Change – Katz &
Rychik
01/04/12
23124/11 CitiMtg 10/07/11 10/19/11 No No No Answer w/ counterclaims and NOA filed
11/25/11Answer filed 12/09/112
16. Sweeney 23222/11 CitiMtg 10/11/11 10/19/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/14/11
17. Sweeney 23374/11 CitiMtg 10/12/11 10/19/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 12/15/11
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
18. Sweeney 23933/11 CitiMtg 10/19/11 10/28/11 No No No
19. Sweeney 24039/11 CitiMtg 10/20/11 12/16/11 No No No
20. Sweeney 24040/11 CitiMtg 10/20/11 12/08/11 No No No21. Sweeney 24041/11 CitiMtg 10/20/11 10/27/11 No No No NOA filed by USA 12/02/11
22. Sweeney 24154/11 CitiMtg 10/21/11 10/28/11 No No No
23. Sweeney 24155/11 CitiMtg 10/21/11 10/27/11 No No No
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 125/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 3
24. Sweeney 24158/11 CitiCorp
Trust FSB
10/21/11 10/28/11 No No No
25. Sweeney 24159/11 CitiMtg 10/21/11 10/27/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/09/11
26. Sweeney 24298/11 CitiMtg 10/24/11 11/02/11 No No No
27. Sweeney 24580/11 CitiMtg 10/27/11 11/21/11 No No No
28. Sweeney 24653/11 CitiMtg 10/28/11 11/16/11 No No No
29. Frenkel 22765/11 US Bank 10/03/11 10/13/11 11/18/12Filed by P
No Yes Ecourts reflects that 1st
FSC held 01/13/12
30. Frenkel 23107/11 Deutsche 10/07/11 10/17/11 No No No
31. Frenkel 23228/11 Wells F 10/11/11 10/31/11 01/06/12
Filed by P
01/11/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/22/12
32. Frenkel 23230/11 OneWest 10/11/11 10/19/11 No No No Discontinuance stip filed 01/20/12 – noreason for discontinuance cited
33. Frenkel 23231/11 OneWest 10/11/11 10/19/11 01/20/12Filed by P
01/20/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/04/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC to be held 03/02/12
34. Frenkel 23305/11 BAC HLS 10/11/11 11/07/11 No No No NOA filed by Maspeth Fed Sav 11/07/11
35. Frenkel 23476/11 HSBC 10/13/11 10/27/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/10/11
36. Frenkel 23477/11 OneWest 10/13/11 10/24/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/01/11
NOA filed by USA 11/16/11
37. Frenkel 23478/11 OneWest 10/13/11 10/27/11 No No No Discontinuance stip filed 12/23/11 – noreason for discontinuance cited
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
38. Frenkel 23856/11 OneWest 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No Discontinuance stip filed 12/23/11 – noreason for discontinuance cited
39. Frenkel 24067/11 HSBC 10/20/11 10/27/11 01/06/12Filed by P
01/11/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o atty 11/18/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/22/12
40. Frenkel 24283/11 BOA 10/24/11 11/01/11 No No No
41. Frenkel 24283/11 BOA 10/24/11 11/01/11 No No No
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 126/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 4
42. Frenkel 24477/11 Deutsche 10/26/11 11/29/11 No No No
43. Frenkel 24745/11 AmHome 10/31/11 11/17/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 12/23/11
44. Shapiro 22843/11 Chase 10/04/11 10/17/11 No No No
45. Shapiro 23011/11 Chase 10/06/11 10/19/11 No No No
46. Shapiro 23076/11 US Bank 10/07/11 10/13/11 No No No
47. Shapiro 23238/11 Chase 10/11/11 10/17/11 No No No
48. Shapiro 23240/11 Chase 10/11/11 11/10/11 No No No
49. Shapiro 23241/11 US Bank 10/11/11 10/17/11 12/23/11Filed by P
11/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/15/12
50. Shapiro 23381/11 Chase 10/12/11 10/19/11 No No No
51. Shapiro 23383/11 PHH Mtg 10/12/11 10/19/11 No No No
52. Shapiro 23386/11 PHH Mtg 10/12/11 10/21/11 11/18/11Filed by P
11/18/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 01/12/12
53. Shapiro 23930/11 US Bank 10/19/11 10/25/11 12/19/11Filed by P
12/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/08/12
54. Shapiro 24030/11 Chase 10/20/11 10/27/11 No No No Discontinuance Notice filed 01/18/12 – noreason for discontinuance cited
55. Shapiro 24033/11 HSBC 10/20/11 12/02/11 12/21/11Filed by P
12/21/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/01/12(Judge Grays – OCA Pilot Project)
56. Shapiro 24037/11 US Bank 10/20/11 10/27/11 12/15/11Filed by P
12/15/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/08/12(found not eligible for FSC)
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
57. Shapiro 24059/ss Deutsche 10/20/11 11/01/11 12/20/11Filed by P
12/20/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se on 11/22/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/09/12
58. Shapiro 24285/11 US Bank 10/24/11 11/01/11 12/19/11Filed by P
12/20/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/08/12
59. Shapiro 24468/11 US Bank 10/26/11 11/01/11 No No No
60. Shapiro 24814/11 Deutsche 10/31/11 12/05/11 12/14/11
Fil d b P
12/14/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/01/12
(J d G OCA Pil t P j t)
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 127/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 5
Filed by P (Judge Grays – OCA Pilot Project)
61. Rosicki 23141/11 Chase 10/07/11 10/20/11 No No No
62. Rosicki 23143/11 Flagstar 10/07/11 10/20/11 02/02/12
Filed by P
02/12/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC to be held 03/12/12
63. Rosicki 23145/11 CitiMtg 10/07/11 11/01/11 No No No
64. Rosicki 23143/11 GMAC 10/12/11 10/24/11 No No No
65. Rosicki 23144/11 US Bank 10/12/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/10/11
66. Rosicki 23416/11 Chase 10/12/11 10/27/11 No No No Answer filed by NYC HPD 11/22/11
67. Rosicki 23637/11 Wells F 10/14/11 10/27/11 No No No
68. Rosicki 23638/11 GMAC 10/14/11 11/07/11 11/23/11
Filed by P
11/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 01/24/12
69. Rosicki 23892/11 Chase 10/19/11 11/07/11 No No No NOA filed by D RBS Citizen70. Rosicki 24182/11 Chase 10/21/11 11/21/11 No No No
71. Rosicki 24374/11 Chase 10/25/11 11/21/11 No No No
72. Rosicki 24407/11 Chase 10/25/11 11/03/11 No No No H/o filed request for production of docs to P
– filed pro se with assistance of LAS
73. Rosicki 24408/11 Chase 10/25/11 11/04/11 No No No
74. Rosicki 24409/11 CitiMtg 10/25/11 11/10/11 No No No
75. Rosicki 24503/11 Chase 10/26/11 01/24/11 No No No
76. Rosicki 24504 Flagstar 1026/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer, NOA and doc demands filed by h/oatty 11/22/11
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
Reply to counterclaim filed by P 12/09/11
77. Rosicki 24591/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/21/11 12/29/11
Filed by P
12/29/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/14/12
78. Rosicki 24592/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/04/11 No No No
79. Rosicki 24593/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/09/11 12/07/11
Filed by P
12/07/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 01/25/12
80 McCabe 22743/11 BOA 10/03/11 10/28/11 No No No Answer filed by ?? 10/28/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 128/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 6
80. McCabe 22743/11 BOA 10/03/11 10/28/11 No No No Answer filed by ?? 10/28/11
81. McCabe 22931/11 HSBC 10/05/11 11/21/11 02/06/12 ?? Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC to be held 03/16/12
82. McCabe 23004/11 BNY 10/06/11 11/21/11 No No No
83. McCabe 23110/11 Aurora 10/07/11 10/27/11 12/13/11
Filed by D
No No Answer filed by h/o atty on 01/31/11
Motion filed by h/o atty 12/13/11
84. McCabe 23223/11 Wells F 10/11/11 11/10/11 No No No
85. McCabe 23224/11 BOA 10/11/11 11/21/11 No No No
86. McCabe 23232/11 GMAC 10/11/11 10/27/11 No No No NOAs filed 10/31/11 and 11/07/11
87. McCabe 23232/11 GMAC 10/11/11 12/19/11 No No No
88. McCabe 23233/11 Aurora 10/11/11 11/15/11 No No No Answer filed 11/18/11
Reply filed 11/29/11
89. McCabe 23367/11 Deutsche 10/12/11 10/31/11 No No No90. McCabe 23471/11 HSBC 10/13/11 11/10/11 No No No
91. McCabe 23512/11 Aurora 10/13/11 11/10/11 No No No NOA filed by NYC HPD 12/01/11
92. McCabe 23598/11 US Bank 10/14/11 10/31/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o 12/14/11
NOA and Reply filed by P co-counselHogan Lovells 01/05/12
93. McCabe 23686/11 Wells F 10/17/11 10/26/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o 11/16/11Reply filed by P 11/22/11
94. McCabe 23687/11 OneWest 10/17/11 01/06/12 No No No95. McCabe 24136/11 Wells F 10/21/11 11/10/11 No No No
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
96. McCabe 24138/11 Wells F 10/21/11 11/09/11 No No No
97. McCabe 24772/11 Consumer
Solutions
10/24/11 12/13/11 No No No
98. McCabe 24375/11 Wells F 10/25/11 11/28/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 01/12/12
Demand for FSC filed by h/o 01/17/12
99. McCabe 24575/11 GMAC 10/27/11 11/15/11 No No No NOAs filed by USA on 12/22/11 and by
Municipal Credit on 11/28/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 129/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 7
Municipal Credit on 11/28/11
100. McCabe 24662/11 Chase 10/28/11 11/21/11 No No No
101. McCabe 24663/11 Aurora 10/28/11 11/21/11 02/08/12
Filed by ?
?? Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC to be held 03/20/12
102. McCabe 24815/11 BNY 10/31/11 11/10/11 No No No103. Fein 22761/11 US Bank 10/03/11 11/09/11 No No No NOA filed by NYC on 12/01/11
104. Fein 23518/11 Wells F 10/13/11 No 10/13/11
Filed by P
No Yes P filed OSC for declaratory judgment
11/22/11; denied 11/23/1. Ecourts identifies
this case as “other real property” – probablyworth looking at actual papers filed
105. Fein 23929/11 GMAC 10/19/11 11/02/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/04/11
106.
Fein 23966/11 MERS 10/19/11 No 10/19/11Filed by P No Yes P filed RJI and OSC on 10/19/11; OSCdenied 01/25/11. Ecourts identifies this
case as “other real property” – probably
worth looking at actual papers filed
107. Fein 24666/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/07/11 12/23/11
Filed by P
12/23/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se 01/19/12
P rejected answer 01/26/12Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/15/12
108. Fein 24667/11 Chase 10/28/11 11/23/11 No No No
109. Fein 24673/11 Chase 10/28/11 11/21/11 No No No110. Fein 24795/11 Chase 10/31/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 12/13/11
111. Fein 24796/11 Chase 10/31/11 11/07/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 01/23/12
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
112. Fein 24797/11 Chase 10/31/11 11/17/11 No No No Discontinuance filed 01/04/12 for the statedreason that the loan had been reinstated.
113. Fein 24798/11 GMAC 10/31/11 11/17/11 No No No114. Fein 24799/11 Nationstar 10/31/11 11/17/11 12/09/11
Filed by P
12/09/11 Yes NOA filed by non-h/o defendant 12/20/11
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/03/12
115. Fein 24805/11 Branch 10/31/11 11/16/11 No No No
116 Katz 22744/11 Deutsche 10/03/11 10/14/11 No No No
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 130/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 8
116. Katz 22744/11 Deutsche 10/03/11 10/14/11 No No No
117. Katz 22835/11 HSBC 10/04/11 10/14/11 No No No
118. Katz 22924/11 HSBC 10/05/11 10/24/11 No No No
119. Katz 22925/11 Wells F 10/05/11 10/14/11 12/28/11
Filed by P
12/28/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held 02/15/12
120. Katz
Atty Change
– Hinshaw
Culbertson12/23/11
23121/11 Deutsche 10/07/11 10/21/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o 11/07/11Reply filed by P 11/14/11
121. Katz 23375/11 US Bank 10/12/11 11/09/11 No No No Answer and “Demand” filed by h/o11/28/11; NOA filed by US Atty 12/22/11
122. Katz 23227/11 Wells F 10/11/11 10/27/11 01/04/12Filed by P
01/04/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o 11/14/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held 02/17/12
123. Katz 23789/11 HSBC 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o’s widower 11/07/11
124. Katz 23790/11 Wells F 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No
125. Katz 23845/11 HSBC 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No NOA and Answer filed by h/o atty 11/23/11
126. Katz 24140/11 BNY 10/21/11 10/31/11 No No No
127. Katz 24281/11 PNC Bank 10/24/11 11/09/11 No No No
128. Katz 24300/11 HSBC 10/24/11 11/09/11 No No No129. Katz 24576/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/07/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 11/29/11
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
Reply filed by P 11/23/11
130. Druckman 22759/11 US Bank 10/03/11 10/31/11 No No No
131. Druckman 22841/11 Capital 1 10/04/11 10/31/11 No No No Guardian report of sale of apt 01/23/12132. Druckman 23075/11 BNY 10/07/11 11/04/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o 11/09/11
NOA filed by US Atty 11/28/11
133. Druckman 23563/11 Wells F 10/14/11 11/14/11 No No No
134 Druckman 24134/11 Deutsche 10/21/11 11/14/11 No No No
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 131/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 9
134. Druckman 24134/11 Deutsche 10/21/11 11/14/11 No No No
135. Druckman 24286/11 Wells F 10/24/11 11/21/11 No No No NOA filed by ?? 12/19/11
136. Druckman 24466/11 Wells F 10/26/11 11/10/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/21/11
137. Druckman 24809/11 Deutsche 10/31/11 12/29/11 No No No
138. Leopold 22868/11 Deutsche 10/04/11 10/20/11 No No No Answer filed h/o atty 11/21/11
Reply to counterclaims filed by P 12/07/11
139. Leopold 22935/11 Deutsche 10/05/11 10/19/11 No No No
140. Leopold 24161/11 Deutsche 10/21/11 No No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/22/11
141. Leopold 24163/11 Wells F 10/21/11 11/10/11 No No No
142. Leopold 24396/11 HSBC 10/25/11 No No No No
143. Leopold 24483/11 HSBC 10/26/11 11/07/11 No No No
144. Leopold 24484/11 Wells F 10/26/11 11/10/11 No No No145. Leopold 24688/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/16/11 No No No
146. Leopold 24689/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/16/11 No No No
147. Stein 23220/11 GMAC 10/11/11 12/23/12 01/23/11
Filed by P
01/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC to be held 03/15/12
148. Stein 23221/11 OneWest 10/11/11 12/19/11 No No No NOA with waiver filed 10/31/11
149. Stein 23600/11 OneWest 10/14/11 12/28/11 No No No
150. Stein 23601/11 OneWest 10/14/11 10/24/11 11/17/11Filed by P
11/17/11 No Answer filed by h/o 12/30/11NOA filed by LSE for h/o 01/18/12
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held on 01/11/12
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
(Judge Grays – Queens Pilot Project)
151. Stein 23860/11 US Bank 10/18/11 11/01/11 01/23/12 01/23/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held on 03/15/12
152. Stein 23861/11 US Bank 10/18/11 10/28/11 01/27/12Filed by P
01/27/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o atty 11/17/11Reply filed by P on 12/02/11
Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held on 03/15/12
153. Stein 23862/11 US Bank 10/18/11 10/25/11 02/01/12Filed by P
02/01/12 Yes Answer filed by h/o atty 11/16/11Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held on 03/20/12
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 132/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 10
y
154. Stein 23863/11 OneWest 10/18/11 11/01/11 11/17/11Filed by P
11/17/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held on 01/09/12
155. Stein 24794/11 OneWest 10/31/11 12/02/11 No No No
156. May 22936/11 Wells F 10/05/11 10/27/11 01/05/12
Filed by P
01/05/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held on 02/23/12
157. May 23151/11 BNY 10/07/11 10/19/11 01/17/12
Filed by P
01/17/12 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st FSC held on 03/01/12
158. May 23914/11 BNY 10/19/11 11/04/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o atty 11/14/11
159. May 23915/11 Waterfall 10/19/11 10/28/11 11/23/11Filed by P
11/23/11 Yes Ecourts reflects 1st
FSC held on 02/23/12
160. May 24058/11 US Bank 10/20/11 11/07/11 No No No
161. May 24584/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/14/11 No No No Answer and Demand for Documents filed
by h/o atty 11/22/11Reply to Counterclaims filed by P 11/30/11
162. De Rose 22836/11 HSBC 10/04/11 10/17/11 12/02/11Filed by P
12/02/11 Yes Ecourts reflects loan was reinstated at 1st FSC held on 01/19/12
163. De Rose 23597/11 GlobalBank
10/14/11 10/27/11 No No No Discontinuance Stip filed 11/22/11 citingpayment of arrears
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
164. De Rose 24825/11 Deutsche 10/31/11 11/09/11 01/04/11Filed by P
01/04/11 Yes Ecourts reflects loan was modified and casesettled at 1st FSC held on 02/08/12
(Judge Grays – Queens Pilot Project)165. De Rose 24826/11 Bayview 10/31/11 11/14/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/15/11
166. Roach 24658/11 HSBC 10/28/11 11/21/11 No No No NOA filed by USA 12/19/11
167. Roach 24560/11 HSBC 10/27/11 11/22/11 No No No NOA filed by NYC HPD 12/14/11
168. Roach 24050/11 Wells F 10/20/11 12/05/11 No No No “Affidavit of Compliance” filed 11/15/11
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 133/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 11
p
Answer filed by h/o atty 12/22/11
169. Roach 24558/11 Wells F 10/27/11 11/16/11 No No No “Affidavit of Compliance” filed 11/15/11
170. Roach 24559/11 US Bank 10/27/11 11/22/11 No No No
171. Berkman 22718/11 GreenTree 10/03/11 10/13/11 No No No Answer filed 10/17/11
172. Berkman 23842/11 Nationstar 10/18/11 10/27/11 No No No NOA filed by MERS 11/28/11Answer filed by h/o pro se 01/27/12
173. Berkman 24284/11 Cent. Mtg. 10/24/11 11/01/11 No No No NOA filed by USA 12/19/11
174. Berkman 24479/11 Sovereign 10/26/11 10/28/11 No No No
175. Stagg 22840/11 Emigrant 10/04/11 10/12/11 10/11/11
Filed by P
10/11/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se 10/26/11
Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 11/28/11
176. Stagg 24038/11 Waterfall 10/20/11 11/09/11 No No No177. Stagg 24577/11 Oceanfirst 10/27/11 11/03/11 11/04/11
Filed by P
11/04/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/16/11
Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 12/22/11
178. Hiscock 23421/11 Bayview 10/12/11 10/26/11 No No No NOA filed by a defendant bank 10/31/11
179. Hiscock 23424/11 Bayview 10/12/11 10/26/11 No No No
180. Schiller 22837/11 M&T 10/04/11 11/14/11 No No No
181. Schiller 22930/11 M&T 10/05/11 10/13/11 12/30/11
Filed by P
12/30/11 Yes Answer filed by h/o 10/14/11
Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 02/28/12(Judge Grays – Queens Pilot Project)
Queens County – October 2011
Firm Index # Bank DateFiled
Aff of Service
RJI Due DlgAff
EcourtsRecord
Other
182. Stiene 23249/11 Chase 10/11/11 11/14/11 No No No NOA filed by IRS 12/19/11
183. Stiene 23489/11 Chase 10/13/11 12/07/11 No No No
184. Borchert 24218/11 Chase 10/24/11 02/03/12 No No No185. Delbello 23179/11 Chase 10/11/11 11/09/11 No No No
186. Deutsch
Atty Change
– Borchert
23787/11 Emigrant 10/18/11 11/17/11 12/30/11Filed by P
12/30/11 Yes Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 02/22/12 butthat h/o not eligible for FSC
7/31/2019 Justice Unsettled- How the Foreclosure Docket & Discontinuances Prevent New Yorkers From Saving Their Houses
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/justice-unsettled-how-the-foreclosure-docket-discontinuances-prevent-new 134/134
Last Reviewed on April 17, 2012 12
Borchert
12/06/11
187. Ginsburg 23870/11 Residential
Dev Group
10/18/11 No No No No Discontinuance Stip filed 01/04/12
ACRIS indicates this is a 1-3 familyw/office or store
188. Knuckles 24651/11 Wells F 10/28/11 12/15/11 No No No NOA filed by unknown party 12/16/11
189. Norris 23774/11 Nat’l Loan 10/18/11 1107/11 No No No Unidentified “Affirmation” filed 10/18/11
190. Platzer 23935/11 TD Bank 10/19/11 11/29/11 No No No
191. Salamon 22822/11 Flagstar 10/04/11 10/17/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 10/26/11
192. Stagg 23020/11 Emigrant 10/06/11 10/13/11 10/11/11Filed by P
10/11/11 No Ecourts indicates 1st
FSC held 11/28/11
193. Weinreb 23152/11 Deutsche 10/07/11 10/20/11 No No No Answer filed by h/o pro se 11/01/11NOA filed by Zava Realty 11/07/11