july25
TRANSCRIPT
Outline for Friday, July 25
� Remember
� Homework due Monday
� Midterm review Monday 4:30 Rackley 105
� Midterm Tuesday� Midterm Tuesday
� Technology
� Review Thursday
� Graphs: TP, MP, AP
� Returns to scale
� Productivity and technical change
Production
� Labor, L, and capital, K, combine to produce output, q
� K cannot be changed in the short run, which ends when K can be changed
Cobb-Douglas Technology
BAKLq =
K
L
Fixed-Proportions Technologies
K
aL = bK
},min{ bKaLq =
L
aL = bK
Perfect-Substitution Technologies
KbKaLy +=
L
Production
Consumers Firms
PreferencesHow much happiness from a
combination of goods
TechnologyHow much output from a
combination of inputs
Production
Consumers Firms
PreferencesHow much happiness from a
combination of goods
TechnologyHow much output from a
combination of inputs
Utility functionA numerical representation of
technology – rescalable
Production functionA numerical representation of
technology – not rescalable
Production
Consumers Firms
Preferences Technology
Utility function ~ rescalable Production function ~ not rescalable
Indifference curves IsoquantsIndifference curvesWhat combos give exactly U
IsoquantsWhat combos make exactly q
Production
Consumers Firms
Preferences Technology
Utility function ~ rescalable Production function ~ not rescalable
Indifference curves Isoquants
MRSMarginal Rate of Technical
Substitution (MRTS)
Production
Consumers Firms
Preferences Technology
Utility function ~ rescalable Production function ~ not rescalable
Indifference curves Isoquants
MRS MRTS
U(X, Y0) and U(X0, Y) F(L, K0) and F(L0, K)
Production
Consumers Firms
Preferences Technology
Utility function ~ rescalable Production function ~ not rescalable
Indifference curves Isoquants
MRS MRTS
U(X, Y0) and U(X0, Y) F(L, K0) and F(L0, K)
MUX and MUY MPL and MPK
Production
Consumers Firms
Preferences Technology
Utility function ~ rescalable Production function ~ not rescalable
Indifference curves Isoquants
MRS MRTS
U(X, Y0) and U(X0, Y) F(L, K0) and F(L0, K)
MUX and MUY MPL and MPK
MRS = - MUX/MUY MRTS = -MPL/MPK
Production
Consumers Firms
Preferences Technology
Utility function ~ rescalable Production function ~ not rescalable
Indifference curves Isoquants
MRS MRTS
U(X, Y0) and U(X0, Y) F(L, K0) and F(L0, K)
MUX and MUY MPL and MPK
MRS = - MUX/MUY MRTS = -MPL/MPK
Diminishing MUX Diminishing MPL ~ beyond a point
Production - differences
Consumers Firms
Utility function ~ rescalable Production function ~ not rescalable
Diminishing MUX Diminishing MPL ~ beyond a point
Eventually diminishing MPL
� At low levels of labor, there may be increasing marginal returns to specialization
Eventually diminishing MPL
� At low levels of labor, there may be increasing marginal returns to specialization
� At some point, these returns will start falling ~ “diminishing marginal returns set in”“diminishing marginal returns set in”
Eventually diminishing MPL
� At low levels of labor, there may be increasing marginal returns to specialization
� At some point, these returns will start falling ~ “diminishing marginal returns set in”“diminishing marginal returns set in”
� It’s still positive
� The same holds for MPK:
� If L is held constant,
� Marginal returns to capital will eventually fall
Figure 6.1 Production Relationships with Variable Labor
B
C
110
90
(a)
© 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
6–19
A
11640
L , Workers per day
56
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� Total product of labor is f(L, K0) – the output
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� Total product of labor is f(L, K0) – the output
� Marginal product of labor is MPL – the slope of f(L, K0)
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� Total product of labor is f(L, K0) – the output
� Marginal product of labor is MPL – the slope of f(L, K0)
� Average product of labor is f(L, K0)/L – the slope of a line from the origin to fline from the origin to f
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� Total product of labor is f(L, K0) – the output
� Marginal product of labor is MPL – the slope of f(L, K0)
� Average product of labor is f(L, K0)/L – the slope of a line from the origin to fline from the origin to f
� When MP is above AP…AP is increasing
� Each additional unit costs more than the average so far
�The average goes up
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� Total product of labor is f(L, K0) – the output
� Marginal product of labor is MPL – the slope of f(L, K0)
� Average product of labor is f(L, K0)/L – the slope of a line from the origin to fline from the origin to f
� When MP is above AP…AP is increasing
� Each additional unit costs more than the average so far
�The average goes up
� When MP is below AP…AP is decreasing
� Where do MP and AP cross?
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� Total product of labor is f(L, K0) – the output
� Marginal product of labor is MPL – the slope of f(L, K0)
� Average product of labor is f(L, K0)/L – the slope of a line from the origin to fline from the origin to f
� When MP is above AP…AP is increasing
� Each additional unit costs more than the average so far
�The average goes up
� When MP is below AP…AP is decreasing
� MP crosses AP at its peak
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� MP crosses AP at its peak
AP
b
20
15
(b)
6–26
Marginal product, MPL
Average product, APL
c
11640
L , Workers per day
15
© 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� MP crosses AP at its peak
� It’s also where the AP ray is tangent to TP
B
A
C
11640
L, Workers per day
110
90
56
(a)
a
(b)
6–27
TP
© 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Marginal product, MPL
Average product, APL
b
a
c
11640
L, Workers per day
20
15
Graphing TP, MP, AP
� Problem 8. q = 1000 min{L, 3K}
� Draw isoquant map (e.g., L = 2, K = 1 � q = 2000)
� Draw the TP, AP, MP of labor curves for a K = K0
Returns to scale
� What is the marginal effect of increasing both inputs?
Returns to scale
� What is the marginal effect of increasing both inputs?
� How does f(tL0, tK0) vary with t?
Returns to scale
q = f(tL0, tK0)
Output Level
Increasingreturns-to-scale
t
Input Level
Decreasingreturns-to-scale
returns-to-scale
Returns to scale
� What is the marginal effect of increasing both inputs?
� How does f(tL0, tK0) vary with t?
� Look at f(tL0, tK0)/ f(L0, K0)
Returns to scale
� What is the marginal effect of increasing both inputs?
� How does f(tL0, tK0) vary with t?
� Look at f(tL0, tK0)/ f(L0, K0)
� > t Increasing returns to scale� > t Increasing returns to scale
� < t Decreasing returns to scale
� = t Constant returns to scale
Returns to scale
� What is the marginal effect of increasing both inputs?
� How does f(tL0, tK0) vary with t?
� Example: q = LAKB
Returns to scale
� What is the marginal effect of increasing both inputs?
� How does f(tL0, tK0) vary with t?
� Example: q = LAKB
� Increasing returns to scale (IRS) if A+B > 1� Increasing returns to scale (IRS) if A+B > 1
� CRS if A+B = 1
� DRS if A+B < 1
Returns to scale
� What is the marginal effect of increasing both inputs?
� How does f(tL0, tK0) vary with t?
� Example: q = LAKB
� Increasing returns to scale (IRS) if A+B > 1� Increasing returns to scale (IRS) if A+B > 1
� CRS if A+B = 1
� DRS if A+B < 1
� Problem 29. q = L0.27K0.16M0.61
Returns to scale
� What is the marginal effect of increasing both inputs?
� How does f(tL0, tK0) vary with t?
� Example: q = LAKB
� Increasing returns to scale (IRS) if A+B > 1� Increasing returns to scale (IRS) if A+B > 1
� CRS if A+B = 1
� DRS if A+B < 1
� Problem 29. q = L0.27K0.16M0.61
� Problem 26.
� (a) q = L+K
� (c) q = L+K+LAKB
Returns to scale
� Problem 22. q = L3/4K1/4
� Fix K=K0. What is the AP of labor?
� Keep K0. What is the MP of labor?
� Are there IRS, CRS, or DRS?� Are there IRS, CRS, or DRS?
Scaling matters
� Unlike the utility, the quantity of output is meaningful
� f(L, K) and 10f(L, K) represent different technology
� Different firms have different productivity
Scaling matters
� Unlike the utility, the quantity of output is meaningful
� f(L, K) and 10f(L, K) represent different technology
� Different firms have different productivity
� We can compare a firm to the most productive firm in the � We can compare a firm to the most productive firm in the industry
� How much could the most productive firm have made with our firm’s inputs?
Scaling matters
� Different firms have different productivity
� We can compare a firm to the most productive firm in the industry
� How much could the most productive firm have made with our firm’s inputs?
� If our firm uses f0 and inputs L0 and K0, while the most productive firm uses f1, then the relative productivity is expressed as a percentage
100),(
),(
001
000×
KLf
KLf
Changing technology
� Technology may change over time
� Firms invest in R&D another model
� Technology advances exogenously
Changing technology
� Technology may change over time
� Firms invest in R&D another model
� Technology advances exogenously
� How can technology change?� How can technology change?
� Overall productivity can increase
� The productivity of one input could increase
Changing technology
� Technology may change over time
� Firms invest in R&D another model
� Technology advances exogenously
� How can technology change?� How can technology change?
� Overall productivity can increase
� f � 2f
� The productivity of one input could increase
� MPL � 2MPL
Changing technology
� Technology may change over time
� Firms invest in R&D another model
� Technology advances exogenously
� How can technology change?� How can technology change?
� Overall productivity can increase
� f � 2f
� This is a neutral change
� The productivity of one input could increase
� MPL � 2MPL
� This is a nonneutral change
Outline for Friday, July 25
� Remember
� Homework due Monday
� Midterm review Monday 4:30 Rackley 105
� Midterm Tuesday� Midterm Tuesday
� Technology
� Review Thursday
� Graphs: TP, MP, AP
� Returns to scale
� Productivity and technical change
� Next time: input costs