july 2015 energy and climate change - columbia...

13
Energy and climate change July 2015

Upload: others

Post on 09-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

Energy and climate change

July 2015

Page 2: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

2

0

250

500

750

Global energy demand expected to grow about 35% by 2040

• Non-OECD nations drive growth in

GDP and energy demand

• Middle class expanding by

~3 billion people

• Energy use per person in non-

OECD remains well below OECD

• Efficiency gains keep OECD

demand flat

• Without efficiency gains, global

demand growth would be four

times larger

1.7%

-0.1%

OECD Non-OECD Total

2040

2010

Average Growth/Year

2010 to 2040

1.0%

Source: ExxonMobil 2015 Outlook for Energy.

Energy Demand Quadrillion BTUs

Growth led by developing economies

Page 3: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

3

• Oil and natural gas lead growth as

energy mix evolves

• Higher oil demand driven by

expanding needs for transportation

and chemicals

• Strong growth in natural gas led by

power generation and industrial

demand

• Demand trends reflect reasonable

cost of carbon assumptions 0

50

100

150

200

250

Oil Gas Coal Other

Renewable*

1.6%

0.1%

2.3%

Nuclear

0.8%

Average Growth/Year

2010 to 2040

2040

2010

Oil and natural gas expected to meet about 60% of global

energy demand in 2040

Source: ExxonMobil 2015 Outlook for Energy.

Solar &

Wind

7.7%

Energy Demand Quadrillion BTUs

1.0%

* Other Renewable includes hydro, geothermal, biofuels, and biomass.

Page 4: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

4

Global emissions

OECD*

Rest of World

China

Key Growth

Emissions per Capita

Tonnes / Person

‘10

‘40

Page 5: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Reducing the probability of worst outcomes

Source: MIT Joint Program, Analysis of Climate Policy Targets Under Uncertainty, Webster, Sokolov, Reilly, et al, Sept. 2009

Average Global Surface Temperature Increase °C

No policy

450 ppm CO2

650 ppm CO2

No policy 0

650 ppm ~200

450 ppm ~2,000

Probability distribution of temperature increase (2000 to 2100)

Pro

ba

bili

ty

Lo

we

r H

igh

er

Mitigation Costs

$/ton CO2 by 2100

Page 6: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

6

Reducing GHGs 50% below 2005 by 2050 requires all steps below:

Investment Required Annual

Additions, #

Annual Additions

Since 2005

Nuclear plants,

1,000 MW 30 < 1

Coal and gas plants with

CCS,

500 MW

55 << 1

Wind turbines,

4 MW 15,600 8,100

Solar PV,

m2 panels 325 million 250 million

Source: IEA Energy Technology Perspectives 2010: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050

Unprecedented pace of technology deployment

Page 7: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

7

Long-range energy technology

IMPROVE

EFFICIENCY

SOUND

POLICY

DIALOGUE

EXPAND

ENERGY

ACCESS

MITIGATE

EMISSIONS

INCREASE

SUPPLY

Advanced Biofuels

& Algae

Natural Gas to

Products

Emerging Power Generation

Technologies

Hydrocarbon & Renewable Energy

Systems

Advanced Carbon Capture

& Sequestration

Economics and Policy

Internal Combustion

Engine Efficiency

Light-weighting and

Packaging Reduction

Methane Emissions

Reduction

Page 8: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

8

Backup

Page 9: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

9

U.S. CO2e emissions from coal plants

CO2e Emitted (k Tonnes/yr)

“Existing” Coal

8.21

0

3

6

9

Existing Coal

Relative Operating Time

Based on 1 MW

generating

baseload

Basis: 2012 NETL; ExxonMobil

Existing Coal,

100%

Page 10: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

10

8.21

3.72

0

3

6

9

Existing Coal New CCGT

U.S. CO2e abatement using natural gas

CO2e Emitted (k Tonnes/yr)

“Existing” Coal

Based on 1 MW

generating

baseload

Combined Cycle

Gas Turbines (CCGT),

100% Existing Coal,

100% Relative Operating Time

Basis: 2012 NETL; ExxonMobil

Page 11: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

11

8.21

3.72

4.49 kT

0

3

6

9

Existing Coal New CCGT

U.S. CO2e abatement using natural gas

“Existing” Coal

Based on 1 MW

generating

baseload

Abated CO2e

@ $23/tonne

CO2e Emitted (k Tonnes/yr)

Combined Cycle

Gas Turbines (CCGT),

100% Existing Coal,

100% Relative Operating Time

Basis: 2012 NETL; ExxonMobil

Page 12: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

12

6.38

3.72

1.83 kT 4.49 kT

0

3

6

9

New Utility Solar PV +Existing Coal

New CCGT

U.S. CO2e abatement with utility solar

CO2e Emitted (k Tonnes/yr)

Abated CO2e

@ $101/tonne

Abated CO2e

@ $23/tonne

Combined Cycle

Gas Turbines (CCGT),

100% Existing Coal,

76%

Relative Operating Time

Basis: 2012 NETL; ExxonMobil

Solar,

24%

Page 13: July 2015 Energy and climate change - Columbia Universityccsi.columbia.edu/files/2015/07/Ken-Cohen-PPT-presentation.pdf · •Efficiency gains keep OECD demand flat •Without efficiency

13

6.38

2.94

1.83 kT

0.77 kT

4.49 kT

0

3

6

9

New Utility Solar PV +Existing Coal

New Utility Solar PV + NewCCGT

U.S. CO2e abatement solar with gas

“Existing” Coal

Abated CO2e

@$236/tonne

CO2e Emitted (k Tonnes/yr)

Abated CO2e

@ $101/tonne

Abated CO2e

@ $23/tonne

Existing Coal,

76%

Relative Operating Time

Basis: 2012 NETL; ExxonMobil

Solar,

24%

Combined Cycle

Gas Turbines (CCGT),

76%

Solar,

24%