july 2013 cmn exchange · dafur.dafur.dafur matam matam sanaag several several several freetown...

2
NIGER TERA: 61% Point Coverage rate MAIN BARRIER: Distance NIGER BATHA: 20% Point Coverage rate MAIN BARRIER: Distance SUDAN AWEIL: 23% Point Coverage rate MAIN BARRIER: RUTF stockout SOMALIA BOSASO IDP CAMP: 35% Point Coverage rate MAIN BARRIER: Alternative Health practitioners preferred JULY 2013 CMN EXCHANGE » NEWS » COVERAGE ASSESSMENTS » UPCOMING EVENTS » Recent Coverage Assessments

Upload: others

Post on 01-Jul-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: juLY 2013 CMN ExCHAngE · Dafur.Dafur.Dafur Matam Matam Sanaag Several Several Several Freetown Kapoeta est weil Bahr el Gazal Batha Region Kanem Kanem Amdam Iriba Sanaa 1 i O2r2

Niger Tera: 61% Point Coverage rate MaiN Barrier: Distance

NigerBaTha:20% Point Coverage rate MaiN Barrier: Distance

SudaN aweil: 23% Point Coverage rate MaiN Barrier: RUTF stockout

SoMaliaBoSaSo idP CaMP: 35% Point Coverage rate MaiN Barrier: Alternative Health practitioners preferred

juLY 2013

CMN ExCHAngE» nEWS » COVERAgE ASSESSMEnTS » UPCOMIng EVEnTS

» recent Coverage Assessments

Page 2: juLY 2013 CMN ExCHAngE · Dafur.Dafur.Dafur Matam Matam Sanaag Several Several Several Freetown Kapoeta est weil Bahr el Gazal Batha Region Kanem Kanem Amdam Iriba Sanaa 1 i O2r2

AFGHANISTATAT NANGOLA

BURKINAFAFAF

S

HA

ITI

KENYAYAY

MALI

NIGERNIGERIA

NEPAPAPLYEMMEN

1111111

2222223333333333

Zai

re

Gab

ela

Hua

mbo

Kab

ul

Pam

a

Yako

Bong

ande

& M

anu

Diapaga

Diapag

a

Pam

a

Danane

Tonkp

i

Toulepleu

Urbain Maroua District

Kisantu

BafwasendeOpala

Kasai Oriental

Dolo Camp

Afar

Somali Region

Port-au-Prince

Gonaives

Isiolo

Nairobi

WestPotok

Laikipia County

GarbatullaTurkana

Kisumi

Kayes

Tahoua

Zin

der

Tilla

berri

Gaya

Marad

i

Fu

ne

Katsin

a

Sap

tari

Dis

tric

t

Tand

o M

oham

mad

Tand

o M

oham

mad

Dad

u

Mindanao

MindanaoGisagara

Dafur

W.Dafur

Matam

Sanaag

Several

Freetown

Freetown

Kapoeta

Aweil West

Bahr el G

azal

Bahr el G

azal

Batha R

egion

Kanem

Kan

emK

anem

Am

dam Iriba

Sanaa

111111111111111111111111111111111 22222222222222222222222222222Kasai Oriental

1111111111111111111

Fu

ne

2F

un

e

222F

un

e

2F

un

e

222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222F

un

e

33

l The CMN presented a poster in the global nutrition Cluster annual meeting which took place in geneva on July 8th to 11th .

» upcoming Events

» upcoming Coverage Assessments

leSSoNS learNed workShoPS:As part of the final CMN activities 3 workshops will be held in Dakar, Nairobi and New Delhi during November and December 2013.

NigerUwimana will be carrying out a SQUEAC, it was postponed due to security

SouTh SudaN Melaku will implement a coverage assessment here.

eThioPiaSanjay is will coordinate a SQUEACin a refugee camp

loNdoN MeeTiNg: On the 17th and 18th of October the CMN, in conjunction with ACF, will be holding a meeting in London called ‘What We Know Now: A Decade of CMAM’. For more information click here

CMN ExCHAngE» nEWS » COVERAgE ASSESSMEnTS » UPCOMIng EVEnTS

l next month the CMN will travel to abuja, Nigeria, to participate in the

CMaM Program Coverage work-shop and support the coverage assessments

planned here

l The CMN is working together with uNiCeF to support SQUEACs in Yemen, Philippines, Mauritania, South Sudan and Madagascar

» News

ASO

IA

Somali Region

222222222222222222222222222222Kasai Oriental

1

2

3

Direct Support

Indirect Support

No Support

ACF Save the Children World Vision

Helen KellerInternational

French Red Cross/Red Cross at Chad

Caritas Merlin

Concern

GOAL

Malaria Consortium

International Medical Corps

KEY

2012/2013

Coverage assessments in CMAM ProgrAMMes

» The Cmn effect

» gLoBAL nUTriTion CLUsTer AnnUAL MeeTing: Geneva, 9 - 11 July 2013

AFGHANISTAN ANGOLA BURKINA FASO IVORY CO

AST C

AM

ER

OO

N D

.R. C

ON

GO

ET

HIO

PIA

HA

ITI KENYA MALI NIGER NIGERIA NEPAL

PAKISTAN

PHIL

IPPIN

ES

RW

AN

DA

SUD

AN

SE

NE

GA

L

S

OM

ALI

A

S

OU

TH S

UDAN

S

IERRA LEONE

CHAD

YEMEN

11

2233

Zai

re

Gab

ela

Hua

mbo

Kab

ul

Pam

a

Yako

Bong

ande

& M

anu

Diapaga

Diapag

a

Pam

a

Danane

Tonkp

i

Toulepleu

Urbain Maroua District

Kisantu

BafwasendeOpala

Kasai Oriental

Dolo Camp

Afar

Somali Region

Port-au-Prince

Gonaives

Isiolo

Nairobi

WestPotok

Laikipia County

GarbatullaTurkana

Kisumi

Kayes

Tahoua

Zin

der

Tilla

berri

Gaya

Marad

i

Keita

Fu

ne

Katsin

a

Sap

tari

Dis

tric

t

Tand

o M

oham

mad

Dad

u

Badi

n

MindanaoGisagara

Dafur

W.Dafur

W.Dafur

Matam

Matam

Sanaag

Several

Several

SeveralSeveral

Freetown

Kapoeta

Aweil West

Aw

eil

Bahr el G

azal

Batha R

egion

Kanem

Kan

em

Am

dam Iriba

Sanaa

111 222i O

2i Or

2rien

2iental

2tal

33112233

11

22F

un

e

2F

un

e

3

Tilla

berriM

indanao

Kapoeta

The CMN Effect

Direct Support

Indirect Support

No Support

ACF Save the Children World Vision

Helen KellerInternational

French Red Cross/Red Cross at Chad

Caritas Merlin

Concern

GOAL

Malaria Consortium

International Medical Corps

KEY

1

Zai

re

Diapag

a

Pam

a

Diapag

a

Pam

a

Yako

Yako

& M

anu

Pam

a

Tonkp

i

lepleu

sende

11Bafwa

Gonaives

Turkana

A

Turkana

rbatulla

Wes

Nairobi

tok

Nairobi

Laikipia County

Nairobi

Laikipia County

Tahoua

Gaya

Marad

iM

aradi

Keita

Tahoua

Gaya

Gaya

Gaya

Gaya

Tilla

berri

Keita

Keita

Badi

n

W.Dafur

11

Several

Several Kapoeta

Aweil West

Aweil West

Aw

eil A

weil

Freetown

Batha R

egion

Kan

em

Bahr el G

azal

Iriba

1

111

22

a

Diapag

a

Diapag

a

Diapag

a

The Coverage Monitoring Network project aims to enhance the capacity

of nutrition programmes to independently design, implement and analyse

coverage assessments. To achieve this, the project offers varying levels

of direct (on-the-job) and indirect (remote) technical support to

programmes around the world. This approach, and the peer-to-peer

support provided by the rapidly growing network, are responsible for the

high number of assessments taking place today. This is the CMN effect.

Jose Luis Alvarez Moran, Sophie Woodhead, Ellie Rogers, Saul Guerrero Action AGAinSt HunGER uK

The Coverage Monitoring network project aims to enhance the capacity of nutrition programmes to independently design, implement and analyse coverage assessments.To achieve this, the project offers varying levels of direct (on-the-job) and indirect (remote) technical support to programmes around the world. This approach,and the peer-to-peer support provided by the rapidly growing network, are responsible for the high number of assessments taking place today. this is the cMn effect.

This graph shows the coverage assessments that have been carried out as a result of the CMn Project since it begun in August 2012.

» 3 examples from Cmn coverage assessments

Low

Medium

High

matam, senegalmarch 2013

This was the 2nd sQUeAC in the area and there has been no improvement since the previous assessment. Despite the remedial actions undertaken following the last sQUeAC (better monitoring, increase in community volunteers trained, home visits), the biggest barriers identified are still present.

toulepleu, Ivory Coastnovember 2012

The assessment was carried out in a rural, western area of ivory Coast. Coverage was estimated to be moderate as a result of a series of factors which included lack of awareness about malnutrition and distance. Key recommendations focused on improving communitymobilisation.

tando mohammad Khan, PakistanJanuary 2013

Program coverage fairly high in this district of Pakistandue to a multitude of boosters such as decentralised oTPs and motivated staff. The key barriers to program access and uptake identified were i) lack of knowledge of the program by carers, and ii) malnutrition not well recognized

Point Coverage: 12.1% (Ci:5.3%-25.8%)

Point Coverage: 42% (Ci: 23.8-62.7)

Point Coverage: 62.6% (Ci 53.8% - 70.6%)

» The Big Picture

34.1%

Cov

erag

e (%

)

POINT n=63 PERIOD n=36

60

80

40

20

100

Coverage Type

55.6%

0

Cov

erag

e (%

)

POINT n=20 PERIOD n=16

60

80

40

20

35.8%

100

0

Coverage Type

62.6%

A review of coverage surveys carried out by different nGos between 2001 and 2006 provides valuable evidence about the coverage achieved by community-based SAMtreatment programmes in both rural (n=19)and camp settings (n=1). A third of these programmes achieved coverage rateshigher than their relevant SPHERE minimum standards. the decentralised approach coupled with regular detection and case-finding, meant that the model had the potential to reach unprecedented levels of the affected population. compared to previous centralised approaches, the median point coverage of 35.8% was a remarkable improvement.

the introduction of easy -to-use coverage assessment techniques in 2008 significantly increased the availability of coverage data for MoH-integrated services implemented during this period. this large dataset (n=71), in rural (n=58), urban (n=11) and camp (n=2) settings, provides valuable insights into the performance of programmes. this analy-sis shows that although the proportion of the population reached was considerably higher than with previous centralised models, community-based SAM treat-ment failed to consistently achieve the high levels of coverage initially expected. 40% of nGo-implemented programmes achieved coverage >50%, while only 7.9% of MoHimplemented programmes reached the same threshold. the difference is further accentuated when a higher threshold is used (>70%); only 15% of nGo implemented programmes achieve this and no MoH-implemented programmes to date has reported such levels of coverage. these results suggest that although MoH-implemented programmes are potentially capable of reaching a high proportion of the SAM population, the operational conditions to do so are seldom met.

Source: S.Guerrero & E.Rogers; Access for All: Volume I. London, June 2013

Source: S.Guerrero & E.Rogers; Access for All: Volume I. London, June 2013

AAH Poster.indd 1 05/07/2013 13:11