judicial vocabulary morgan sanders. activist approach

71
Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders

Upload: jazmin-michell

Post on 31-Mar-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Judicial Vocabulary

Morgan Sanders

Page 2: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Activist approach

Page 3: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The view that judges should discern the general principles underlying the Constitution and its often vague language and assess how best to apply them in contemporary circumstances, in some cases with the guidance of moral or economic philosophy

Page 4: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Amicus curiae

Page 5: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A Latin term meaning “a friend of the court”. Refers to interested groups or individuals, not directly involved in a suit, who may file legal briefs or make oral arguments in support of one side.

Page 6: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Brief

Page 7: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A legal document prepared by an attorney representing a party before a court. The document sets forth the facts of the case, summarizes the law, gives the arguments for its side, and discusses other relevant cases.

Page 8: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Civil law

Page 9: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The body of rules defining relationships among private citizens. It consists of both statutes and the accumulated customary law embodied in judicial decisions (“the common law”)

Page 10: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Class action suit

Page 11: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A case brought into court by a person on behalf of not only himself but all other persons in the country under similar circumstances. For example, in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, the Supreme Court decided that not only Linda Brown but all others similarly situated had the right to attend a local public school of their choice without regard to race.

Page 12: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Concurring opinion

Page 13: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A Supreme Court opinion by one or more justices who agree with the majority’s conclusion but for different reasons.

Page 14: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Constitutional court

Page 15: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A federal court exercising the judicial powers found in Article III of the Constitution and whose judges are given constitutional protection: they may not be fired (they serve during “good behavior”), nor may their salaries be reduced while they are in office. The most important constitutional courts are the Supreme Court, the 94 district courts, and the courts of appeals (one in each of 11 regions plus one in the District of Columbia).

Page 16: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Court of appeals

Page 17: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The federal courts with authority to review decisions by federal district courts, regulatory commissions, and certain other federal courts. Such courts have no original jurisdiction; they can hear only appeals. There are a total of 12 courts of appeals in the United States and its territories.

Page 18: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Criminal law

Page 19: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The body of rules defining offenses that, though they harm an individual (such as a murder, rape, and robbery), are considered to be offenses against society as a whole and as a consequence warrant punishment by and in the name of society.

Page 20: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Dissenting opinion

Page 21: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A Supreme Court opinion by one or more justices in the minority to explain the minority’s disagreement with the Court’s ruling.

Page 22: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

District courts

Page 23: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The lowest federal courts where federal cases begin. They are the only federal courts where trials are held. There are a total of 94 district courts in the United States and its territories.

Page 24: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Diversity cases

Page 25: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• Cases involving citizens of different states over which the federal courts have jurisdiction as described in the Constitution.

Page 26: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Dual sovereignty doctrine

Page 27: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• State and federal authorities can prosecute the same person for the same conduct. The Supreme court has upheld this doctrine because:– Each level of government has the right to

enact laws serving its own purposes– Neither level of the government wants the

other to be able to block prosecution of an accused person who has the sympathy of the authorities at one level

Page 28: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Federal-question cases

Page 29: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• Cases concerning the Constitution, federal law, or treaties over which the federal courts have jurisdiction as described in the Constitution.

Page 30: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Fee shifting

Page 31: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A law or rule that allows the plaintiff (the part that initiates the law suit) to collect its legal costs from the defendant if the defendant loses.

Page 32: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

In forma pauperis

Page 33: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A Latin term meaning “in the form of a pauper”. Someone who is without the funds to pursue the normal costs of a lawsuit or criminal defense. Upon the court's granting of this status the person is entitled to waiver of normal costs and/or appointment of counsel (but seldom in other than a criminal case).

Page 34: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Judicial review

Page 35: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The power of the courts to declare acts of the legislature and of the executive to be unconstitutional and hence null and void.

Page 36: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Legislative court

Page 37: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A court that is created by Congress for some specialized purpose and staffed with judges who do not enjoy the protection of Article III of the Constitution. Legislative courts include the Court of Military Appeals and the territorial courts.

Page 38: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Litmus test

Page 39: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• In chemistry a way of finding out if a liquid is acid or alkaline. The term is used in politics to mean a test of ideological purity, a way of finding out if a person is a dyed-in-the-wool liberal or conservative or what his or her views are on a controversial question.

Page 40: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Marbury vs. Madison

Page 41: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• Background: The case began on March 2, 1801, when an obscure Federalist, William Marbury, was designated as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia. Marbury and several others were appointed to government posts created by Congress in the last days of John Adams's presidency, but these last-minute appointments were never fully finalized. The disgruntled appointees invoked an act of Congress and sued for their jobs in the Supreme Court.

• Questions: Is Marbury entitled to his appointment? Is his lawsuit the correct way to get it? And, is the Supreme Court the place for Marbury to get the relief he requests?

• Decision: Yes; yes; and it depends. The justices held, through Marshall's forceful argument, that on the last issue the Constitution was "the fundamental and paramount law of the nation" and that "an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void." In other words, when the Constitution--the nation's highest law--conflicts with an act of the legislature, that act is invalid. This case establishes the Supreme Court's power of judicial review.

Page 42: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

McCulloch vs. Maryland

Page 43: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• Background: In 1816, Congress chartered The Second Bank of the United States. In 1818, the state of Maryland passed legislation to impose taxes on the bank. James W. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the bank, refused to pay the tax.

• Questions: The case presented two questions: Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank? Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers?

• Decision: In a unanimous decision, the Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers. Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Marshall noted that Congress possessed unenumerated powers not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. Marshall also held that while the states retained the power of taxation, "the constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof are supreme. . .they control the constitution and laws of the respective states, and cannot be controlled by them."

Page 44: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Opinion of the court

Page 45: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A Supreme Court opinion written by one or more justices in the majority to explain the decision in a case.

Page 46: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Per curiam opinion

Page 47: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A brief, unsigned opinion issued by the Supreme Court to explain its ruling.

Page 48: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Plaintiff

Page 49: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The party that initiates a lawsuit to obtain a remedy for an injury to his or her rights.

Page 50: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Political question

Page 51: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• An issue that the Supreme Court refuses to consider because it believes the Constitution has left it entirely to another branch to decide. Its view of such issues may change over time, however. For example, until the 1960s the Court refused to hear cases about the size of congressional districts, no matter how unequal their populations. In 1962, however, it was decided that it was authorized to review the constitutional implications of this issue.

Page 52: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Remedy

Page 53: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A judicial order preventing or redressing a wrong or enforcing a right.

Page 54: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Section 1983 case

Page 55: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• Section 1983 of Chapter 42 of the United States Code allows a citizen to sue a state or government official who has deprived the citizen of some constitutional right or withheld some benefit to which the citizen is entitled.

Page 56: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Senatorial courtesy

Page 57: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The custom in the U.S. Senate of refusing to confirm a presidential appointment to office opposed by both senators from the state of the appointee or by the senior senator of the President's party.

Page 58: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Solicitor general

Page 59: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The solicitor general is the third-ranking officer of the Department of Justice, right after the attorney general and the deputy attorney general. The solicitor general what cases the government will appeal from lower courts and personally approves every case the government presents to the Supreme Court.

Page 60: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Sovereign immunity

Page 61: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A doctrine that a citizen cannot sue the government without its consent. By statute, Congress has given its consent for the government to be sued in many cases involving a dispute over a contract or damage done as a result of negligence.

Page 62: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Standing

Page 63: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A legal concept establishing who is entitled to bring a lawsuit to court. For example, an individual must ordinarily show personal harm in order to acquire standing and be heard in court.

Page 64: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Stare decisis

Page 65: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A latin term meaning “let the decision stand”. The practice of basing judicial decisions on precedence established in similar cases decided in the past.

Page 66: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Strict constructionalist approach

Page 67: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• The view that judges should decide cases on the basis of the language of the Constitution.

Page 68: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Supreme court of the United States

Page 69: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• America's highest court, which has the final power to decide cases involving the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, certain legal areas set forth in the Constitution (called federal questions) and federal laws. It can also make final decisions in certain lawsuits between parties in different states. The U.S. Supreme Court has nine justices -- one of whom is the Chief Justice -- who are appointed for life by the President and must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Most states also have a supreme court, which is the final arbiter of the state's constitution and state laws. However, in several states -- most notably New York and Maryland, where it's called the "Court of Appeals," and Massachusetts, where it's called the "Supreme Judicial Court" -- the highest state court uses a different name.

Page 70: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

Writ of certiorari

Page 71: Judicial Vocabulary Morgan Sanders. Activist approach

• A latin term meaning “made more certain”. An order issued by a higher court to a lower court to send up the record of a case for review. Most cases reach the Supreme Court through the writ of certiorari, issued when at least 4 of the 9 justices feel the case should be reviewed.