judge matthew gary caught on transcript unaware of court reporter - illegal summary denial of ex...

DESCRIPTION

Hon. Matthew J. Gary caught on court reporter transcript summarily denying emergency ex parte motion for illegal, out-of-state child abduction. As the transcript records, Gary was unaware a court reporter was present and refuses to hear any argument whatsoever, denying the due process rights of the parties. Over several years - in multiple cases - Gary has been caught in serial violations of the Code of Judicial Ethics, the state laws all judges must follow. For examples, visit this URL at Sacramento Family Court News: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/MATTHEW%20J.%20GARYThis transcript is from the Susan Ferris case. For full coverage: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/FERRIS%20CASECalifornia Judicial Branch News Network: cjbnn.com

TRANSCRIPT

  • ..i,

    1

    '\._...,. ' 2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15 ''----

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26 "/r"'"' ;. 27

    28 '-._...

    THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

    ---ooo---

    In re the Marriage of:

    DAVID M. FERRIS,

    Petitioner,

    VS CASE NO. 98FL05615

    SUSAN C. FERRIS, ORIGINAL Respondent.

    ---ooo---

    REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF EX PARTE PROCEEDINGS

    Held in the Superior Court, in and for the County of Sacramento, Department 121, on Wednesday, April 4, 2012;

    Before the HONORABLE MATTHEW J. GARY, Judge

    For the Petitioner:

    For the Respondent:

    Reported By:

    ---ooo---

    APPEARANCES

    TIMOTHY ZEFF Attorney at Law 2609 Capitol Avenue Sacramento, California

    LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN R. FRUMKIN Attorney at Law 5996 Horseshoe Bar Road Loomis, California 95650 BY: STEVE GIMBLIN,

    Attorney at Law

    Tara Murany, CSR No. 12892

    ~--------SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS --------~

    PatCJBNN-Yel

  • 1

    2

    SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

    APRIL 4, 2012

    3 ---ooo---

    4 Proceedings in the Marriage of Ferris, Case

    5 No.98FL05615, came on regularly this day before the Honorable

    6 MATTHEW J. GARY, Judge of the Superior Court of California,

    7 for the County of Sacramento, Department 121, thereof.

    8 The Petitioner, DAVID M. FERRIS, was represented by

    9 TIMOTHY ZEFF, Attorney at Law.

    10 The Respondent, SUSAN C. FERRIS, was represented by

    11 STEVE GIMBLIN, Attorney at Law.

    12 The following proceedings were then had, to wit:

    13 ---ooo---

    14 THE COURT: Okay. On the ex parte, on Ferris and

    15 Ferris, I'm summarily denying the request for any relief.

    16 I'll go ahead and set it for hearing. But the existing

    17 custody order is that Mr. Ferris has sole legal, sole

    18 physical custody of the child with no contact to mom, and he

    19 can send the child to Utah. He can send the child to

    20 New York. He can send the child to Asia. It's his sole

    21 discretion. So I'll go head and put it on for hearing, but I

    22 can't -- I'm not going the address this on an ex parte.

    23 MR. ZEFF: Can I ask there's one problem with

    24 the moving papers, and that is my address is incorrectly

    25 reported in there on one of the documents.

    26 THE COURT: Okay.

    27 MR. ZEFF: I brought it to the attention of

    28 Mr. Frumpkin, but I see it wasn't changed on the -- it's in

    ~--------SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS--------1

    PatLine

    PatLine

    PatRectangle

  • 1

    ''-----~ 2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28 '-----'

    the demographics. My address is 2609 Capitol Avenue. They

    got me at 2509. I'm just afraid stuff won't get sent to me. THE COURT: Okay. We'll note it.

    I'm sorry, I didn't realize we have a record. Both

    parties are present. Good morning to both. And --

    MR. GIMBLIN: Good morning, Your Honor.

    Steve Gimblin withAl Frumkin's office

    THE COURT: Good morning.

    MR. GIMBLIN: for the Respondent. So you're not

    entertaining any argument today?

    THE COURT: No, it's an e x parte. The only reason

    I mentioned it is while b o th side s were here, I would just go ahead and give you an idea of why I'm summarily denying it,

    but I won't entertain argument on it. There's an existing--

    her complaint is that the child has been shipped to Utah to a

    school. Whether it's true or not is not the issue. Even if

    it is true, the existing custody order is tha t he has sole

    legal, sole physical custody, and he can do that.

    MR. GIMBLIN: Your Honor, it's not really coming

    from the mother's perspective, although she is here today.

    It's really looking out for the child. The request also

    seeks counsel for the child.

    THE COURT: Counsel, I'll put all o f that on for a

    noticed hearing. I won't do that on an ex parte is the

    point. We're going to give you a date, hearing date on it,

    and that will probably -- probably be good for you because

    you'll be able to review the file. You may be able to review

    some transcripts, and you may be able to come up to speed on

    ~--------SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS--------2

    PatLine

    PatRectangle

    PatLine

  • 1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    what you're actually into.

    MR. GIMBLIN: I was aware of the no contact order.

    I just think that it is an emergency given the shocking nature

    THE COURT: Yeah, I don't.

    MR. GIMBLIN: -- of the transfer.

    THE COURT: I don't. And unfortunately between you

    and I, it's my judgment that controls. I do not see the emergency on it given what we've gone through, given the

    history of the file.

    So I'll put you on. I'll give you a noticed

    12 hearing, and you'll be able to come on back, and we'll take

    13 argument on the case, on the motion.

    14 MR. GIMBLIN: You're going to set the date by

    15 minute order, Your Honor?

    16 THE COURT: No. You'll actually get it on your OSC

    17 today, and then you'll be able to serve the other side, and

    18 we'll have you come on back. And hopefully I'll have the

    19 moving papers and the replies or responsive dec, and I'll go

    20 ahead and consider the thing anew.

    21 MR. GIMBLIN: Is there any way we can get it on a

    22 shortened notice period?

    23 THE COURT: There is, but I wouldn't grant it. I

    24 didn't grant an OST on this either. We'll go ahead and set

    25 it for a regular noticed hearing.

    26 MR. GIMBLIN: Thank you, Your Honor.

    27 THE COURT: Thank you all.

    28 MR. ZEFF: Do we get to pick a date now?

    ~--------SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS--------3

  • 1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    THE COURT: Madam Clerk is looking in the system

    now to get you a date. Thank you.

    (Whereupon, proceedings concluded.)

    ~---------SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS---------4

  • 1

    2

    CERTIFICATE OF SHORTHAND REPORTER

    ---oOo---

    3 I, Tara Murany, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of

    4 the State of California, do hereby certify that I am a

    5 disinterested person herein; that I reported the foregoing

    6 hearing in shorthand writing to the best of my ability; that

    7 I thereafter caused my shorthand writing to be transcribed

    8 into typewriting.

    9 I further certify that I am not of counsel or

    10 attorney for any of the parties to said hearing, or in any

    11 way interested in the outcome of said hearing.

    12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand

    13 this 5th day of April, 2012.

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    CAUSE: The Marriage of Ferris

    COURT: Sacramento County Court

    JUDGE: Matthew J. Gary

    DATE: April 4, 2012

    ORIGINAL

    ~. ffil\11AJ~'!L Tara Murany CSR No. 12892

    ~--------SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS--------~