jpog february 2012 hk

Upload: karena-sabado

Post on 11-Feb-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    1/59

    www.jpog.com

    JAN/FEB 2012 Vol. 38 No. 1

    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS, OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY

    Your partner in paediatricand O&G practice

    www.jpog.comwww.jpog.com

    JAN/FEB 2012 Vol. 38 No. 1 Your partner in paediatricand O&G practice

    ISSN 1012-8875(HONG KONG)

    Management ofPregnancies With

    Previous Caesarean Section

    CME ARTICLE

    JOURNAL WATCH

    GYNAECOLOGY

    HKCOG

    Guidelines

    Induction o

    Ovulation

    Does

    My Child

    Have a

    Food Allergy?

    PAEDIATRICS

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    2/59

    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS, OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY

    Journal Watch

    1 Asthmainpregnancy:TreatmentguidedbyFENO measurement

    WomenexposedtoDES in utero:Moreonadversehealthoutcomes

    HospitaldeliverypolicyinChinaandneonatalmortality

    2 Polycysticovarysyndrome:Adversepregnancyoutcomes

    VitaminAsupplementsforchildrenindevelopingcountries:

    Systematicreviewandmeta-analysis AdenoidectomyforrecurrentURTIsinchildren:Negativetrial

    3 BenetsofroutinerotavirusvaccinationforUSchildren

    MillenniumDevelopmentGoals4and5:Anupdateonprogress

    Immunoglobulinforneonatalsepsis:Noteffective

    Acyclovirsuppressivetherapyaftertreatmentofneonatalherpes

    4 Malariaandbacteraemiainchildren

    Adjuvantedinuenzavaccineforchildren

    Board Director, Paediatrics

    Professor Pik-To CheungAssociate ProessorDepartment o Paediatricsand Adolescent Medicine

    The University o Hong Kong

    Board Director, Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    Professor Pak-Chung HoHead, Department oObstetrics and GynaecologyThe University o Hong Kong

    Editorial Board Professor Biran AffandiUniversity o Indonesia

    Dr Karen Kar-Loen Chan

    The University o Hong Kong

    Associate Professor Oh Moh Chay

    KK Womens and Childrens Hospital,Singapore

    Associate Professor Anette Jacobsen

    KK Womens and Childrens Hospital, Singapore

    Professor Rahman Jamal

    Universiti Kebagsaan Malaysia

    Dato Dr Ravindran Jegasothy

    Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Associate Professor Kenneth Kwek

    KK Womens and Childrens Hospital, Singapore

    Dr Siu-Keung Lam

    Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong

    Professor Terence Lao

    Chinese University o Hong Kong

    Dr Kwok-Yin Leung

    The University o Hong Kong

    Dr Tak-Yeung Leung

    Chinese University o Hong Kong

    Professor Tzou-Yien LinChang Gung University, Taiwan

    Professor Somsak LolekhaRamathibodi Hospital, Thailand

    Professor Lucy Chai-See LumUniversity o Malaya, Malaysia

    Professor SC NgNational University o Singapore

    Professor Hextan Yuen-Sheung NganThe University o Hong Kong

    Professor Carmencita D PadillaUniversity o the Philippines Manila

    Professor Seng-Hock QuakNational University o Singapore

    Dr Tatang Kustiman SamsiUniversity o Tarumanagara, Indonesia

    Professor Perla D Santos OcampoUniversity o the Philippines

    Associate Professor Alex Sia

    KK Womens and Childrens Hospital, Singapore

    Dr Raman SubramaniamFetal Medicine and Gynaecology Centre, Malaysia

    Professor Walfrido W SumpaicoMCU-DFT Medical Foundation, Philippines

    Professor Cheng Lim TanKK Womens and Childrens Hospital, Singapore

    Associate Professor Kok Hian TanKK Womens and Childrens Hospital, Singapore

    Dr Surasak TaneepanichskulChulalongkorn University, Thailand

    Professor Eng-Hseon Tay

    Thomson Womens Cancer Centre, Singapore

    Professor PC WongNational University o Singapore

    Dr George SH YeoKK Womens and Childrens Hospital, Singapore

    Professor Hui-Kim YapNational University o Singapore

    Professor Tsu-Fuh YehChina Medical University, Taiwan

    1

    4

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 i

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    3/59

    The Friso Gold range with * comprises a key prebiotic and two probiotics to

    support a healthy stool pattern, a prerequisite or optimal intestinal health in children

    p=0.009 vs baseline

    p=0.01 vs baseline

    10

    5

    0

    l

    l

    l

    l

    Bow

    elmovements/week

    Baseline 2 weeks 4 weeks

    Bifdobacterium lactisand Lactobacillus paracaseiurther increasebowel movements to target age-specic needs in growing children2

    Stool frequency

    after 28 days of feeding

    M

    eannumberofstoolsperday

    3

    2.5

    2

    1.5

    1

    0.5

    0

    Human milk Oligosaccharide formula Control

    Stool consistency

    after 28 days of feeding

    Stoolconsistencyscores

    4

    3.5

    3

    2.5

    2

    1.5

    1

    0.5

    0

    2.75

    2.2p

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    4/59

    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS, OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY

    Publisher

    Ben Yeo

    Publication Manager

    Marisa Lam

    Deputy Managing Editor

    Greg TownAssociate EditorGrace Ling

    Design Manager

    Rowena Sim

    Designer

    Connie Lim

    Production

    Edwin Yu, Ho Wai Hung,Jasmine Chay

    Circulation

    Christine Chok

    Accounting Manager

    Minty Kwan

    Advertising Coordinator

    Jenny Lim

    Published by:UBM Medica Pacifc Limited27th Floor, OTB Building160 Gloucester Road,Wan Chai, Hong KongTel: (852) 2559 5888

    Email: [email protected]

    PUBLISHER: Journal of Paediatrics, Obstetric & Gynaecology (JPOG) ispublished 6 times a year by UBM Medica, a division o United Business Media.CIRCULATION: JPOG is a controlled circulation or medical practitionersin South East Asia. It is also available on subscription to members o alliedproessions. SUBSCRIPTION: The price per annum is US$42 (surace mail,students US$21) and US$48 (overseas airmail, students US$24); back issues

    US$8 per copy. EDITORIAL MATTER published herein has been prepared byproessional editorial sta. Views expressed are not necessarily those o UBMMedica. Although great care has been taken in compiling and checking theinormation given in this publication to ensure that it is accurate, the authors,the publisher and their servants or agents shall not be responsible or in any wayliable or the continued currency o the inormation or or any errors, omissionsor inaccuracies in this publication whether arising rom negligence or otherwisehowsoever, or or any consequences arising thererom. The inclusion or exclusiono any product does not mean that the publisher advocates or rejects its useeither generally or in any particular eld or elds. COPYRIGHT: 2012 UBMMedica. All rights reserved. No part o this publication may be reproduced, storedin a retrieval system or transmitted in any orm or by any means, electronic,mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, in any language, withoutwritten consent o copyright owner. Permission to reprint must be obtainedrom the publisher. ADVERTISEMENTS are subject to editorial acceptance andhave no infuence on editorial content or presentation. UBM Medica does notguarantee, directly or indirectly, the quality or ecacy o any product or servicedescribed in the advertisements or other material which is commercial in nature.Philippine edition: Entered as second-class mail at the Makati Central PostOce under Permit No. PS-326-01 NCR, dated 9 Feb 2001. Printed by FortunePrinting International Ltd, 3rd Floor, Chung On Industrial Building, 28 Lee ChungStreet, Chai Wan, Hong Kong.

    ChinaTeo Wai Choo

    Tel: (86 21) 6157 3888Email: [email protected]

    Hong KongKristina Lo-Kurtz, Jacqueline Cheung,Marisa LamTel: (852) 2559 5888Email: [email protected]

    IndiaMonica BhatiaTel: (91 80) 4346 4500Email: enq [email protected]

    JapanMamoru TakagiTel: (81 3) 5562 6961Email: [email protected]

    KoreaKevin Yi, Nathan KimTel: (82 2) 3019 9350Email: [email protected]

    IndonesiaHata Hasibuan, Sri Damayanti,

    Ritta PamolangoTel: (62 21) 729 2662Email: [email protected]

    MalaysiaMeera Jassal, Lee Pek Lian,Irene Lee, Grace YeohTel: (60 3) 7954 2910Email: [email protected]

    PhilippinesDebbie Pangan, Rose VegaPaula Lopez, Marian Chua,Kims PagsuyuinTel: (63 2) 886 0333Email: [email protected]

    SingaporeJason Bernstein, Carrie Ong,Kenric Koh, Elijah LeeTel: (65) 6223 3788Email: [email protected]

    TaiwanClara Wong

    Tel: (886 2) 2577 6096Email: [email protected]

    ThailandWipa SriwijitchokTel: (66 2) 741 5354Email: [email protected]

    VietnamNguyen Thi Lan Huong,Bui Thi Cam TrucTel: (84 8) 3829 7923Email: [email protected]

    Europe/USAKristina Lo-Kurtz, Maria KaiserTel: (852) 2116 4352Email: [email protected],

    [email protected]

    Enquiries and Correspondence

    5

    33

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 ii

    ReviewArticles

    Gynaecology

    5 HKCOGGuidelinesInductionofOvulation

    This guideline by The Hong Kong College o Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (HKCOG) coversthe classiication o ovulation disorders, treatment options o various ovulation disorders, and their

    associated risks.

    Yeung Wing Yee Tracy, Lee Chi Yan Vivian, Li Hang Wun Raymond, Ng Hung Yu Ernest;for The Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

    Paediatrics

    33 DoesMyChildHaveaFoodAllergy?

    Avoidance, education about management o an acute reaction and optimal treatment o other atopicconditions, particularly asthma, are the mainstays o treatment o ood allergy in children.

    Preeti Joshi

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    5/59

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    6/59

    JAN/FEB 2012

    Vol. 38 No. 1

    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS, OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 iii

    ReviewArticlesComprehensive reviesproviing the latest clinicalinformation on all aspectsof the management of meicalconitions affecting chilrenan omen.

    CaseStudiesInteresting cases seen in generalpractice an their management.

    PictorialMedicineVignettes of illustrate casesith clinical photographs.

    For more information, please refer to the Instructions for Authors on our ebsite www.jpog.com, or contact:The EditorUBM Meica Asia Pte Lt, No 3 Lim Teck Kim Roa, Genting Centre, Singapore 088934

    Tel: (65) 6223 3788 Fax: (65) 6221 4788 E-mail: [email protected]

    The Journal of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology contains articles under licence rom UBM Media LLC. The articlesappearing on pages 4953, and pages 6780 are reprinted with permission o Consultant for Pediatricians. Copyright 2011UBM Media LLC. All rights reserved.

    ReviewArticle

    Continuing Medical Education

    45 ManagementofPregnanciesWithPreviousCaesareansection

    This article reviews the recommendations on vaginal birth ater previous caesarean section (VBAC)by dierent proessional societies, the avourable and unavourable actors in considering VBAC,

    the associated maternal and etal beneits and risks, as well as the non-medical concerns that

    play a role in the decision-making process.

    Yung WK, Lau WL, Leung WC

    257

    The Cover:Does My Child Have

    a Food Allergy 2012 UBM Medica

    Rowena Sim, Art DirectorConnie Lim, Illustrator

    45

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    7/59

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    8/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 1

    OBSTETRICS

    Asthmainpregnancy:Treatment

    guidedbyFENO measurement

    Fraction o exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a measure

    o airway inlammation. A study at two hospitals

    in Australia has shown that the management o

    asthma in pregnancy might be improved by using

    measurements o FENO to guide therapy.

    A total o 220 pregnant, non-smoking women

    with asthma were randomized at 1220 weeks

    gestation to management using a clinical symp-

    toms algorithm or an FENO algorithm. With the lat-

    ter, the dose o inhaled steroid was increased at

    FENO > 29 ppb and reduced at F

    ENO < 16 ppb, at

    monthly visits to the antenatal clinic. The rate o

    asthma exacerbations was 0.288 per pregnancy in

    the FENO group and 0.615 per pregnancy in the con-

    trol group, a signiicant 50% reduction in the F ENO

    group. The number-needed-to-treat was 6. Qual-

    ity o lie was improved signiicantly in the FENO

    group; the mean daily dose o steroid was less

    and more women received long-acting 2

    agonist

    therapy. Neonatal outcomes tended to be better in

    this group.

    Use o the FENO algorithm could improve the

    management o asthma in pregnancy.

    Powell H et al. Management o asthma in pregnancy guided bymeasurement o raction o exhaled nitric oxide: a double-blind,

    randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 983990; Szefer SJ.

    Personalised medicine or asthma management in pregnancy. Ibid:

    963964 (comment).

    WomenexposedtoDES in utero:

    Moreonadversehealthoutcomes

    It has been known or 40 years that diethylstil-

    bestrol (DES) given to mothers during pregnancy

    induces clear-cell adenocarcinoma o the vagina

    and cervix in their daughters in adolescence and

    early adulthood. Later, developmental deects othe genital tract and complications o pregnancy

    were added to the long-term eects. Now, three

    US cohort studies combined have provided more

    long-term data.

    Altogether, the three studies, with ollow-

    up to an average age o 48 years, included 4,653

    women exposed to DES in utero and 1,927 unex-

    posed controls. The risks o 12 outcomes were

    assessed in exposed women and controls up to

    the age o 45 or reproductive outcomes and 55

    or other outcomes. The risks or all 12 outcomes

    were increased in exposed women compared with

    controls. The rates or exposed women versus

    controls and hazard ratios were: inertility, 33.3%

    vs 15.5% (2.37); spontaneous abortion, 50.3% vs

    38.6% (1.64); ectopic pregnancy, 14.6% vs 2.9%

    (3.72); loss o second-trimester pregnancy, 16.4%

    vs 1.7% (3.77); preterm delivery, 53.3% vs 17.8%

    (4.68); preeclampsia, 26.4% vs 13.7% (1.42); still-

    birth, 8.9% vs 2.6% (2.45); neonatal death, 2.4%

    vs 0.56% (8.12); early menopause 5.1% vs 1.7%

    (2.35); cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or

    greater, 6.9% vs 3.4% (2.28); breast cancer at age

    40 years or older, 3.9% vs 2.2% (1.82); and clear-

    cell adenocarcinoma, 0.09% vs 0.0% (ininity).

    Vaginal epithelial changes at baseline increased

    the risk o most outcomes.

    The daughters o women who took DES inpregnancy have increased lietime risks or a wide

    range o adverse outcomes.

    Hoover RN et al. Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to

    diethylstilbestrol. NEJM 2011; 365: 13041314.

    HospitaldeliverypolicyinChina

    andneonatalmortality

    In many countries, a major obstacle to reducing

    mortality in children < 5 years old is reractoriness

    o neonatal mortality. In China, home births have

    been discouraged and birth in hospital is now the

    rule. Less than hal o all births were in hospital

    in 1988, but in 2008 almost all babies were born

    in hospital. This policy appears to have been ac-

    companied by a marked all in neonatal mortality.

    A population-based epidemiological study was

    carried out at 116 surveillance sites (37 urban, 79 ru-

    ral) between 1996 and 2008; during this time, neona-

    tal mortality ell by 62% (rom 24.7 to 9.3 per 1,000

    live births). Most neonatal deaths (82%) occurred in

    the rst week o lie and more than hal were in the

    rst 2 days. Neonatal mortality was lower in urban

    than in rural areas and highest in the most deprived

    rural areas. Neonatal mortality declined in almost all

    regions and rom almost all causes.These researchers attribute the reduction in

    neonatal morality to the policy o hospital births

    and improvements in obstetric and neonatal care.

    Commentators advise caution in the interpretation

    o these results.

    Feng XL et al. Chinas acility-based birth strategy and neonatal mortality:

    a population-based epidemiological study. Lancet 2011; 378: 14931500;

    Bassini DG, Roth DE. Chinas progress in neonatal mortality. Ibid: 1446

    1447 (comment).

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    9/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 2

    Polycysticovarysyndrome:

    Adversepregnancyoutcomes

    The incidence o polycystic ovary syndrome has

    been reported as 315% o women o reproduc-

    tive age. The eatures include hyperandrogenism,

    anovulation, and polycystic ovaries. Meta-analyses

    have shown that the condition is associated with

    increased risks o gestational diabetes, pre-ec-

    lampsia, preterm birth, and perinatal mortality. It

    has been unclear, however, whether the risks are

    due to the polycystic ovary syndrome itsel or to

    the associated eatures such as obesity or ertility

    treatments with increased risk o multiple preg-

    nancy. Now, a study in Sweden has shown that

    polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with ad-

    verse pregnancy outcomes irrespective o the use

    o assisted reproductive technology.

    Using national birth and patient registers,

    data were obtained or all singleton births in Swe-

    den between 1995 and 2007. There were 1,195,123

    births, and in 3,787 cases the mother had polycys-

    tic ovary syndrome. The risks o adverse pregnancy

    outcomes (gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia,

    low Apgar score, meconium aspiration, small or

    large or gestational age, macrosomia) were ad-

    justed or maternal characteristics, socioeconomic

    actors, and use o assisted reproductive technol-

    ogy. Comparing women with polycystic ovarian syn-

    drome with women without the syndrome, aectedwomen were more likely to be obese (61% vs 35%)

    and to have used assisted reproductive technology

    (14% vs 2%). They were 45% more likely to have

    pre-eclampsia, 2.2 times more likely to have very

    preterm delivery, and 2.3 times more likely to have

    gestational diabetes. Among their inants, there

    was a 39% increase in largeness or gestational

    age, a twoold increase in meconium aspiration,

    and a 40% increase in low Apgar score at 5 min-

    utes.

    Women with a diagnosis o polycystic ovary

    syndrome are at increased risk o adverse preg-

    nancy outcomes irrespective o whether they have

    used assisted reproductive technology or not.

    Roos N et al. Risk o adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with

    polycystic ovary syndrome: population based cohort study. BMJ 2011;

    343: 835 (d6309); Macklon NS. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Ibid: 804805

    (d6407) (editorial).

    PAEDIATRICS

    VitaminAsupplementsfor

    childrenindevelopingcountries:

    Systematicreviewandmeta-

    analysis

    A systematic review and meta-analysis has con-

    irmed the value o vitamin A supplements given to

    children in developing countries.

    The study included 16 trials (194,483 chil-

    dren aged 6 months to 5 years). Vitamin A supple-

    mentation was associated with a 24% reduction in

    mortality. There was a signiicant 28% reduction

    in diarrhoea mortality and a non-signiicant 20%

    reduction in measles mortality. There were signii-

    cant reductions in prevalence o Bitots spots o the

    bulbar conjunctiva (by 55%), night blindness (by

    68%), and xerophthalmia (by 69%).

    Vitamin A supplementation or children aged

    6 months to 5 years reduces the incidence o di-arrhoea and overall mortality. It also results in

    signiicant reductions in the eatures o vitamin A

    deiciency and might prevent blindness rom this

    cause.

    Mayo-Wilson E et al. Vitamin A supplements or preventing mortality,

    illness, and blindness in children aged under 5: systematic review and

    meta-analysis. BMJ 2011; 343: 519 (d5094); Thorne-Lyman A, Fawzi

    WW. Improving child survival through vitamin A supplementation. Ibid:

    487488 (d5294) (editorial).

    Adenoidectomyforrecurrent

    URTIsinchildren:Negativetrial

    It has long been suspected that early adenoidec-

    tomy is not beneicial or children with recurrent

    upper respiratory tract inections (URTIs). A trial in

    the Netherlands has conirmed these suspicions.

    A total o 111 children aged 116 years se-

    lected or adenoidectomy by ear, nose and throat

    surgeons because o recurrent URTIs were random-

    ized to adenoidectomy (with or without myringoto-

    my) within 6 weeks or a strategy o wait-and-see.

    Follow-up was or up to 24 months. The rate o

    URTIs was 7.91 episodes per child-year (adenoid-

    ectomy) versus 7.84 episodes per child-year (con-

    trols). The rate o new URTIs was similar over time

    in the two groups, with a gradual decrease. The

    groups did not dier signiicantly on ollow-up in

    the rate o ever with ear symptoms or in quality-

    o-lie measures. The adenoidectomy group had

    more days with ever during ollow-up (20 vs 16

    days per child-year). During the trial, 40% o the

    control group underwent adenoidectomy, but their

    presurgery URTIs were not more severe than those

    o the 60% who did not undergo surgery and they

    ared no better than those 60% ater surgery.

    Early adenoidectomy does not beneit young

    children with recurrent URTIs.

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    10/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 3

    PEER REVIEwEd

    Van den Aardweg MTA et al. Eectiveness o adenoidectomy in children

    with recurrent upper respiratory tract inections: open randomised

    controlled trial. BMJ 2011; 343: 520 (d5154); Kvaerner KJ. Adenoidectomy

    in children with recurrent upper respiratory inections. Ibid: 488489

    (d5274) (editorial).

    Benetsofroutinerotavirus

    vaccinationforUSchildren

    Routine inant vaccination with pentavalent rotavi-

    rus vaccine (RV5) was introduced in the USA in Feb-

    ruary 2006. Beore that, there were an estimated

    400,000 visits o children < 5 years old nationally

    to physicians oices or rotavirus diarrhoea, with

    200,000 visits to emergency departments, 55,000

    hospital admissions, and 2060 deaths each year.

    MarketScan databases (containing inormation

    rom insurance claims) were used to obtain inor-

    mation about RV5 coverage and diarrhoea-associ-

    ated health problems in children < 5 years old in

    the periods July 2001 to June 2006 and July 2007

    to June 2009. By the end o December 2008, 73%

    o children < 1 year old had received at least one

    dose o RV5. Rates o hospital admission or diar-

    rhoea in this age group were 52 per 10,000 person-

    years in 20012006, 35 per 10,000 person-years

    in 20072008, and 39 per 10,000 person-years in

    20082009. Rates o hospital admission or rota-

    virus diarrhoea in these periods were 14, 4, and 6

    cases per 10,000 person-years, respectively. Indi-

    rect beneit rom the vaccine (among unvaccinated

    children) was shown by reductions o diarrhoea ill-

    ness in January to June 2008 but not in the same

    period in 2009. Nationally in 20072009, there were

    an estimated 64,855 ewer hospital admissions or di-

    arrhoea among children < 5 years old with a saving in

    health-care costs o US$278 million.

    The introduction o routine inant vaccination

    with RV5 was ollowed by substantial reduction in

    diarrhoea among the under-5s and substantial sav-

    ing in health-care costs.

    Cortes JE et al. Rotavirus vaccine and health care utilization or diarrhoea

    in US children. NEJM 2011; 365: 11081117.

    MillenniumDevelopmentGoals

    4and5:Anupdateonprogress

    The targets or Millennium Development Goals

    (MDGs) 4 and 5 are a reduction in under-5 mortal-

    ity by two-thirds and in maternal mortality ratio by

    three-quarters between 1990 and 2015. A urther

    update on progress has been reported using recent

    surveys, censuses, vital registration, and verbal

    autopsy data.

    It is estimated that under-5 deaths will have

    allen to 7.2 million in 2011 with 2.2 million early

    neonatal deaths, 0.7 million late neonatal, 2.1 mil-

    lion postneonatal inantile, and 2.2 million o chil-

    dren aged 14 years. The rate o decline o under-5

    mortality was greater in 20002011 than in 1990

    2000 in 106 countries. There has been no progress

    towards MDG-4 in our countries. Maternal mor-

    tality has allen rom 409,100 in 1990 to 273,500

    in 2011. In 2011, it is estimated that 56,100 ma-

    ternal deaths will be human immunodeiciency vi-

    rusrelated. Twenty developing countries show no

    progress towards MDG-5. Current estimates sug-

    gest that 31 countries will achieve MDG-4, 13 will

    achieve MDG-5, and nine will achieve both targets.

    Fourteen countries are likely to achieve both tar-

    gets by 2020. Lancet commentators question the

    value o requent, diering estimates o progress.

    Most developing countries will not achieve the tar-

    gets o MDG-4 and MDG-5 until many years ater

    2015.

    Lozano R et al. Progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5

    on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet

    2011; 378: 11391165; Byass P, Graham WJ. Grappling with uncertainties

    along the MDG trail. Ibid: 11191120 (comment).

    Immunoglobulinforneonatal

    sepsis:Noteffective

    The results o trials o immunoglobulin as prophy-

    laxis or treatment or neonatal sepsis have been

    variable, and there is still no consensus about its

    value. A large international trial has shown no ben-

    eit o intravenous immunoglobulin or the treat-

    ment o neonatal sepsis.

    At 113 centres in nine countries, a total o

    3,493 newborn inants (birth weight < 1,500 g) re-

    ceiving antibiotic treatment or proved or suspect-

    ed sepsis were randomized to polyvalent IgG immu-

    noglobulin 500 mg/kg, or placebo, repeated ater

    48 hours. The primary outcome (death or major

    disability at age 2 years, adjusted or gestational

    age) occurred in 39% o each group. Death beore

    hospital discharge occurred in 17% o each group,

    and there were no dierences between the groups

    in other secondary outcomes.

    Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin

    did not aect outcomes.

    The INIS Collaborative Group. Treatment o neonatal sepsis with

    intravenous immunoglobulin. NEJM 2011; 365: 12011211.

    Acyclovirsuppressivetherapy

    after treatment of neonatal

    herpes

    Ater neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) inec-

    tion, the risk o sequelae depends on the initial

    clinical picture. Supericial disease (skin, eye, and

    mouth) is associated with a low risk o neurological

    impairment, although there may be skin recurrenc-

    es. With disseminated disease, there is a 30% mor-

    tality rate and a 20% risk o neurological damage in

    survivors. Central nervous system (CNS) inection

    carries a 6% mortality and a 70% risk o permanent

    neurological sequelae. Two paralleled multicentre

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    11/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 4

    trials in the USA, reported together, have shown

    that 6 months o oral acyclovir ater initial paren-

    teral treatment may be beneicial.The two trials together included 74 neonates

    with HSV inection, 29 with supericial disease,

    and 45 with CNS involvement. They were treated

    with parenteral acyclovir or 14 days (supericial

    disease) or 21 days (CNS disease). Randomization

    was then to oral acyclovir or placebo three times

    daily or 6 months. Acyclovir suppressive therapy

    prolonged the time to two cutaneous recurrences

    in the CNS disease group but not in the supericial

    disease group. Among the 45 inants with initial

    CNS disease, three had a CNS recurrence within 12

    months o entering the study, one assigned to acy-

    clovir and two to placebo. On the Mental Develop-

    ment Index o the Bayley Scales o Inant Develop-

    ment, perormed at 12 months o age on 28 o the

    45 inants, the mean score was signiicantly lower

    in the placebo group (68.12) than in the acyclovir

    group (88.24). There was a trend towards more neu-

    tropenia in the acyclovir group.

    Six months o oral suppressive therapy with

    acyclovir ater initial parenteral therapy may im-

    prove neurodevelopmental outcomes ater neona-

    tal HSV inection. An editorialist avours treating

    all children with either supericial or CNS disease.

    Kimberlin DW et al. Oral acyclovir suppression and neurodevelopment

    ater neonatal herpes. NEJM 2011; 365: 12841292; Gershon AA.

    Neonatal herpes simplex inection and the three musketeers. Ibid: 1338

    1339 (editorial).

    Malariaandbacteraemiain

    children

    Bacteraemia is common in children in sub-Saharan

    Arica. Human immunodeiciency virus (HIV) inec-

    tion, malnutrition, and sickle-cell disease all con-

    tribute to the susceptibility. Malaria is also thought

    to make children susceptible to invasive bacterial

    inections. Sickle-cell trait (HbAs), however, pro-

    vides protection against malaria, and researchers

    in Kenya have taken advantage o this to perorm amendelian randomization study.

    First, they studied 292 children aged 3

    months to 13 years with bacteraemia and 528

    control children. Bacteraemia was associated with

    sickle-cell disease, HIV inection, undernutrition,

    and leukocyte haemozoin pigment. Sickle-cell trait

    was associated with a 64% reduction in risk o

    bacteraemia. Next, they perormed a longitudinal

    case-control study with 1,454 cases (children with

    bacteraemia) and 10,749 controls. Between 1999

    and 2007, the rate o hospital admission or malaria

    ell rom 28.5 to 3.45 admissions per 1,000 child-

    years because o more eective malaria control. At

    the same time, the protection provided by sickle-

    cell trait against bacteraemia ell and hospital

    admissions or bacteraemia, largely Gram-negative

    bacteraemia including cases due to non-typhoidal

    salmonella, decreased in parallel with those or

    malaria, rom 2.59 to 1.45 per 1,000 child-years.

    Malaria parasitaemia increased the risk o bacte-

    raemia 6.7-old. In 1999, the prevalence o para-

    sitaemia in the community was 29%, and 62% o

    cases o bacteraemia were attributed to malaria.

    Malaria control should reduce the preva-

    lence o bacteraemia.

    Scott JAG et al. Relation between alciparum malaria and bacteraemia

    in Kenyan children: a population-based, case-control study and a

    longitudinal study. Lancet 2011; 378: 13161323; Obaro S, Greenwood B.

    Malaria and bacteraemia in Arican chil dren. Ibid: 12811282 (comment).

    Adjuvantedinuenzavaccinefor

    children

    Many countries recommend seasonal inluenza

    vaccination or children, but the trivalent inactivat-

    ed vaccine (TIV) produces poor immune responses

    in young children. Now, the addition o MF59, an

    oil-in-water emulsion, as an adjuvant to TIV, has

    been shown to increase the immunogenicity o TIV

    and to give greater eicacy.

    A total o 4,707 children aged 6 to < 72

    months were randomized to TIV without adju-

    vant, TIV with adjuvant (ATIV), or a control (non-

    inluenza) vaccine. The vaccines were given as

    two doses, with an interval o 28 days, during the

    inluenza seasons o 20072008 and 20082009 in

    Germany and 20082009 in Finland. The rates o

    inluenza-like illness were 0.7% (ATIV), 2.8% (TIV),

    and 4.7% (controls), and the vaccine eicacy rates

    against all inluenza strains were 86% (ATIV) and

    43% (TIV). Among children aged 6 to < 36 months,

    the eicacy was 79% (ATIV) and 40% (TIV). Among

    children aged 36 to < 72 months, the corresponding

    eicacies were 92% and 45%. The antibody titres

    achieved were greater with ATIV. There were more

    systemic reactions with ATIV in the older children.

    The rate o adverse reactions was similar in all

    three groups.

    ATIV was more eicacious than TIV in in-

    ants and young children.

    Vesikari T et al. Oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant with infuenza vaccine in

    young children. NEJM, 2011; 365: 14061416.

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    12/59

    GYNAECOLOGY I PEER REVIEwEd

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 5

    PURPOSE AND SCOPE

    This guideline covers the classiication o ovulation disorders, treatment options o vari-

    ous ovulation disorders, and their associated risks.

    INTRODUCTION

    Ovulation disorders account or 20% o the causes o subertility.1 The goal o ovulation

    induction is to achieve development o a single ollicle and subsequent ovulation in

    women with anovulation. The selection o the most appropriate treatment or ovula-

    tion disorders depends upon reaching the correct diagnosis. Patients should be ully

    inormed o the treatment options available, the success o each treatment option, and

    the associated risks.

    CLASSIFICATION

    Ovulation disorders can be classiied according to the anatomical site where the hypo-

    thalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis is deicient (Table 1). The corresponding World Health

    Organization (WHO) classiication2 is also given or reerence (Figure 1).

    Adequate history and physical examination are essential. Further investigations

    are necessary to pinpoint where the deect in the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis is

    occurring. Based on the results o the investigation, the causes o anovulation can be

    divided into our distinct categories.3

    HKCOGGuidelinesInductionofOvulation

    Yeung Wing Yee Tracy, MBBS (HK), MRCOG, FHKCOG, FHKAM (O&G); Lee Chi Yan Vivian, MBBS (HK), MRCOG, FHKCOG, FHKAM (O&G); Li Hang Wun Raymond, MBBS (HK),

    MMedSc (HK), MRCOG, FHKCOG, FHKAM (O&G), Cert RCOG (Reproductive Medicine), Cert HKCOG (Reproductive Medicine);

    Ng Hung Yu Ernest, MBBS (HK), MD (HKU), FRCOG, FAMHK (O&G);

    for The Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    13/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 6

    GYNAECOLOGYGYNAECOLOGY I Peer revIewed

    Hyperprolactinaemia

    Hyperprolactinaemia can be ound in 15% o wom-en with anovulation, and in 75% o women with

    both anovulation and galactorrhoea.4 It intereres

    with the pulsatile secretion o gonadotrophin-re-

    leasing hormone (GnRH) and impairs normal ovarian

    unction. Causes o hyperprolactinaemia include a

    prolactin-producing adenoma, other tumours o the

    pituitary region blocking the inhibitory control o

    the hypothalamus, primary hypothyroidism, chronic

    renal ailure, and a variety o drugs.

    Prolactin molecules orm irregular high-

    molecular-weight polymers to produce a bio-

    logically inactive orm called macroprolactin.

    Macroprolactinaemia has no clinical signiicance

    and does not require any treatment. It should be

    considered in patients with no apparent hyperpro-

    lactinaemic symptoms.5 The correct diagnosis can

    be made using prolactin chromatography and poly-

    ethylene glycol immunoprecipitation. It has been

    suggested that routine screening or macroprolactin

    Table 1: Classifcation o ovulation disorders

    1. Intrinsic ovarian ailure (WHO group III) Genetic, autoimmune, ollowing chemotherapy or

    radiotherapy

    2. Secondary ovarian dysunction

    a. Disorders o gonadotrophin regulation

    Specifc Hyperprolactinaemia Kallmanns syndrome (WHO group I)

    Functional (WHO group I)

    Weight loss, exercise, drugs, idiopathicb. Gonadotrophin defciency (WHO group I)

    Pituitary tumour, pituitary necrosis or thrombosis

    c. Disorders o gonadotrophin action (WHO group II)

    Polycystic ovary syndrome

    WHO = World Health Organization.

    in sera rom subjects with suspected hyperprolacti-

    naemia is cost-eective and should be perormedto prevent inaccurate diagnosis and unnecessary

    intervention or hyperprolactinaemia.6

    Asymptomatic patients with hyperprolactinae-

    mia may not require treatment, and periodic obser-

    vation should then suice. When a woman with a

    macroprolactinoma wishes to become pregnant, it

    is necessary to plan conception to occur ater se-

    rum prolactin is normalized and the tumour volume

    is signiicantly reduced in order to avoid or reduce

    the risk o compression o the optic chiasm during

    pregnancy.7

    The irst-line treatment is the use o dopa-

    mine agonists, which lower prolactin concentration

    and cause shrinkage o a prolactinoma i present.

    Surgery in the orm o trans-sphenoidal pituitary ad-

    enomectomy is seldom indicated in the presence o

    a prolactinoma because o high recurrence rate and

    possibility o panhypopituitarism.8,9 Radiotherapy

    is used very inrequently and is considered onlyi both medical and surgical treatments ail or are

    contraindicated.

    Hypergonaotrophic Hypogonaism (wHO

    Group III)

    Hypergonadotrophic hypogonadism or ovarian ail-

    ure may be due to chromosomal abnormalities, au-

    toimmune disorders, inection (mumps oophoritis),

    and irradiation or cytotoxic drugs. Many cases,

    however, are idiopathic even ater extensive in-

    vestigations. These women present with primary

    or secondary amenorrhoea with low endogenous

    oestrogen and highly elevated ollicle-stimulating

    hormone (FSH) levels. There is no advantage in

    perorming laparoscopy and ovarian biopsy to de-

    tect the presence o ollicles in the resistant ovary

    syndrome because o the invasive nature and the

    doubtul value o the procedure.10,11

    About hal o young women with spontane

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    14/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 7

    GYNAECOLOGYGYNAECOLOGY I Peer revIewed

    Figure 1: Flowchart o diagnosis and treatment

    ous hypergonadotrophic hypogonadism experienceintermittent and unpredictable ovarian unction,

    and spontaneous pregnancies have been reported

    in approximately 510% o cases subsequent to

    the diagnosis.12 Although there have been case re-

    ports o successul ovulation induction treatment,

    any orm o ovulation induction is not advisable

    in these women. The only realistic treatment or

    these patients is the use o donor eggs in an in

    vitro ertilization setting. In addition, they should

    be oered long-term hormone replacement therapy

    to protect their bones rom the deleterious eects

    o hypooestrogenism.

    Hypogonaotrophic Hypogonaism (wHO

    Group I)

    These patients present with primary or secondary

    amenorrhoea. They have very low serum oestradiol

    concentration due to low FSH and luteinizing hor-

    mone (LH) secretion rom the pituitary gland (hypog-

    onadotrophic hypogonadism). It can be due to eithercongenital causes such as Kallmanns syndrome

    (isolated gonadotrophin deiciency and anosmia) or

    acquired causes such as pituitary tumour, pituitary

    necrosis (Sheehans syndrome), stress, and exces-

    sive weight loss (anorexia nervosa).

    Surgery is clearly indicated in patients with

    central nervous system tumours. Patients with ano-

    rexia nervosa may beneit rom psychotherapy and

    weight gain ater extensive counselling. Pulsatile

    GnRH or gonadotrophins containing both FSH and

    LH13 are oered to patients with other hypogonado-

    trophic causes or with persisting anovulation de-

    spite weight gain.

    Normogonaotrophic Anovulation (wHO

    Group II)

    This includes a heterogeneous group o patients

    who can present either with regular cycles, oli-

    gomenorrhoea, or even amenorrhoea. The mid-

    FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone; GnRH = gonadotrophin-releasing hormone; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone.

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    15/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 8

    GYNAECOLOGYGYNAECOLOGY I Peer revIewed

    luteal serum progesterone is low, FSH levels are in

    the normal range, and prolactin is normal. Most othese patients are likely to have polycystic ovary

    syndrome (PCOS). Other causes include congenital

    adrenal hyperplasia, adrenal tumours, and andro-

    gen-producing ovarian tumours. In these conditions,

    the patient may have clinical symptoms or signs o

    hyperandrogenism such as hirsutism, which should

    require more detailed investigations such as meas-

    urement o dehydroepiandrosterone sulate and

    17-hydroxyprogesterone.

    Obese PCOS women will beneit rom weight

    loss, as this might lead to resumption o sponta-

    neous periods and ovulation and will also improve

    their response to ovulation induction. They usu-

    ally respond well to clomiphene citrate (CC) or aro-

    matase inhibitors, ailing that, to gonadotrophins

    or ovulation induction. Insulin-sensitizing agents

    or laparoscopic ovarian drilling may be considered

    in those not responding to CC. Speciic causes, such

    as adrenal or ovarian tumours, should be treated by

    removing the cause. Congenital adrenal hyperpla-

    sia beneits rom corticosteroid therapy.

    TREATMENT

    Eective use o ovulation induction agents requires

    understanding o their mechanism o action, proper

    indications, dierent regimens, monitoring meth-

    ods, and potential complications.

    weight Reuction

    Body mass index (BMI) is more representative o

    body at and is calculated as weight in kilogrammes

    divided by height in metres squared. Overweight is

    deined as BMI 25 kg/m2 and obesity is BMI

    30 kg/m2.14 Overweight and obese women have a

    higher incidence o menstrual disturbance, ovula-

    tion disorders, and subertility.15 They may require

    higher dosage o ovulation drugs to achieve suc-

    cessul ovulation but have lower ovulation rates

    and delayed responses to various treatments oovulation induction, i needed.

    Ovulation induction with CC in overweight and

    obese women results in lower ovulation rates16 and

    lower cumulative live birth rates or women with

    a BMI > 30 kg/m2.17 The dose o CC required to

    achieve ovulation is positively correlated with body

    weight.18 Ovulation rates ollowing gonadotrophin

    therapy in overweight women are lower owing to

    higher cancellation rates,19,20 but this decreased

    success rate is not ound in all studies.21 Women

    with BMI o 2528 need a gonadotrophin dose 50%

    higher than normal-weight women.22 Obese women

    are also more prone to pregnancy complications

    such as miscarriage,23 gestational diabetes, hyper-

    tension, macrosomia, and diicult delivery.24

    Multiple observational studies report that

    weight loss is associated with improved spontane-

    ous ovulation rates in women with PCOS, 15 even a-

    ter losing < 5% o body weight.25 Weight loss

    Patients seeking treatment or ovulation disorders should beully inormed o the treatment options available, the success

    o each treatment option, and the associated risks.

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    16/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 9

    GYNAECOLOGYGYNAECOLOGY I Peer revIewed

    is thereore recommended as irst-line therapy in

    obese women with and without PCOS seeking preg-nancy. This recommendation is based on extrapola-

    tion rom the beneits o weight loss seen in medi-

    cal conditions, such as diabetes and cardiovascular

    disease. There is a paucity o studies suggesting

    that weight loss prior to conception improves live

    birth rate in obese women with or without PCOS. 26

    The guidelines or dietary and liestyle inter-

    vention in PCOS have been proposed.26 Liestyle

    modiication is the irst orm o therapy, combining

    behavioural (reduction o psychosocial stressors),

    dietary, and exercise management. Reduced-energy

    diets (5001,000 kcal/day reduction) are eective

    options or weight loss and can reduce body weight

    by 710% over a period o 612 months . Structured

    exercise is an important component o a weight-

    loss regime; aim or > 30 minutes per day. These in-

    terventions should be conducted prior to pregnancy

    and not during ovulation induction, as the eects o

    calorie restriction and increased physical activity inthe periconceptional period are unknown.27

    Meical Inuction of Ovulation

    Dopamine Agonists

    Three dopamine agonists, bromocriptine, cabergo-

    line and quinagolide, are licensed or treatment o

    hyperprolactinaemia. Experience with bromocrip-

    tine is ar more extensive, and thereore or women

    undergoing ovulation induction this drug remains

    the treatment o choice, with cabergoline and quin-

    agolide as acceptable second-line drugs in patients

    who are intolerant o bromocriptine.28

    Mechanism of action. The secretion o

    prolactin rom the lactotroph cells in the anterior

    pituitary gland is mainly regulated by the tonic

    inhibitory control o a prolactin inhibiting actor,

    which in humans is predominantly dopamine. Drugs

    with dopaminomimetic activity lower prolactin

    secretion, restore gonadal unction, and shrink a

    prolactinoma, i present.

    Regimen and monitoring. Bromocriptine isgiven at a daily dosage o 2.520 mg in divided dos-

    es 23 times a day. Serum prolactin concentrations

    are regularly measured, and ovulation is checked

    by mid-luteal progesterone concentrations. Other

    orms o monitoring or ovarian response are not

    required, as its use is not associated with multiple

    pregnancy or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

    (OHSS).

    Cabergoline and quinagolide have longer bio-

    logical hal lives than bromocriptine. Cabergoline

    can be taken once or twice weekly and quinagolide

    once daily.

    In patients who do not ovulate even when

    prolactin concentrations are within normal range,

    dopamine agonists can be combined with anti-oes-

    trogen or gonadotrophin as appropriate.

    Results. Bromocriptine can normalize serum

    prolactin concentrations in 8090% o patients

    with microprolactinomas and about 70% o those

    with macroprolactinomas, together with a decrease

    in tumour size.7,9 Dopamine agonist therapy restores

    ovulation in about 90% o women with anovulation

    related to hyperprolactinaemia.

    A prospective study suggested that the overall

    Experiencewithbromocriptineis

    farmoreextensive,andtherefore

    forwomenundergoingovulation

    inductionthisdrugremains

    the treatment of choice

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    17/59

    Period free HRT

    Rapid... Symptom relief1

    Recommend low dose HRT... Activelle

    When its timefor period free HRT

    You can trustfirst line, first choice.

    Additive... Effect of NETA

    1

    Reliable... Freedom from periods2

    Easy... to switch to3

    References:

    1) Notelovitz et al, Poster NAMS 1998

    2) Johnson et al, Menopause 2002; 9(1):16-22

    3) Data on file

    Further information is available on request : DKSH Hong Kong Limited Tel : (852) 2895 9668 Fax : (852) 2895 9548 H R T D

    2 0 1 0 0 1

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    18/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 11

    GYNAECOLOGYGYNAECOLOGY I Peer revIewed

    estimated rates o remission at 5 years in patients

    treated with bromocriptine were 76% among pa-tients with non-tumoural hyperprolactinaemia, 67%

    among those with microprolactinomas, and 57%

    among those with macroprolactinomas.29

    Cabergoline 30,31 and quinagolide32,33 are shown

    to be signiicantly more eective than bromocrip-

    tine in restoring normal prolactin concentrations

    and ovulatory cycles. Quinagolide is probably less

    eective than cabergoline in hyperprolactinaemic

    patients.28

    It is recommended that the minimal length o

    dopamine agonist therapy in patients with prolacti-

    noma should be 1 year.7 Normalization o magnetic

    resonance imaging prior to the withdrawal o do-

    pamine agonists and longer duration o the drug

    therapy are signiicant predictors o remission.34 I

    a patient has normal prolactin concentrations ater

    dopamine agonist therapy or at least 3 years and

    the tumour volume is markedly reduced, a trial o

    tapering and discontinuation o these drugs maybe initiated. Long-term ollow-up is essential with

    close monitoring or recurrent hyperprolactinaemia

    and renewed tumour growth.

    Side-effects. Side-eects with bromocrip-

    tine are common and include nausea, vomiting,

    abdominal cramps, vertigo, postural hypotension,

    headaches, and drowsiness. Although they are

    usually transient and mild, around 12% o pa-

    tients discontinue the treatment or this reason.28

    The side-eects can be minimized by increasing

    the dose gradually rom a low starting dose given

    with a meal in the evening, or by administering

    vaginal bromocriptine. A slow-release oral prepara-

    tion may also reduce the incidence o side-eects.

    Signiicantly lesser side eects were reported in

    patients taking cabergoline and quinagolide when

    compared with bromocriptine.28

    There is no increase in the incidence o mul-

    tiple pregnancy, OHSS and spontaneous abortion

    with dopamine agonists.

    Bromocriptine, cabergoline or quinagolide hasnot been associated with any detrimental eect on

    pregnancy or etal development.28 It is still recom-

    mended that patients with microprolactinomas or

    idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia stop bromocriptine

    treatment once pregnancy has been conirmed

    in order to avoid any potential harmul eects.

    Continuation o bromocriptine therapy during preg-

    nancy may be considered in cases o macroprolacti-

    noma or where there is evidence o tumour expan-

    sion.7,9

    While there is considerable experience o

    bromocriptine use in women undergoing ovula-

    tion induction and during pregnancy, data on oth-

    er dopamine agonists used in pregnancy are still

    limited.

    The European Medicines Agency has recom-

    mended new warnings and contraindications or

    ergot-derived dopamine agonists as a result o the

    risk o ibrosis, particularly cardiac ibrosis, associ-ated with chronic use. Cardiac valvulopathy should

    be excluded by echocardiography beore treatment

    with cabergoline or bromocriptine, and patients

    should be monitored during treatment.35 Women

    who are planning pregnancy are urther advised to

    stop taking cabergoline 1 month beore they try to

    conceive.

    Anti-oestrogens

    Clomiphene citrate

    Clomiphene citrate is commonly used as the irst-

    line drug in women who suer rom normogonado-

    trophic anovulation (WHO group II).

    Mechanism of action. It is an orally active

    non-steroidal compound with both oestrogenic and

    anti-oestrogenic properties with its primary mecha-

    nism o action based on the anti-oestrogenic prop-

    erty. It displaces endogenous oestrogen rom oes-

    trogen receptors in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis,

    which diminishes its negative eedback and

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    19/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 12

    GYNAECOLOGYGYNAECOLOGY I Peer revIewed

    increases the secretion o GnRH and thus gonado-

    trophins. The increase in FSH and LH stimulate theproduction o ovarian ollicles and subsequent ovu-

    lation.

    Regimen and monitoring. CC should be

    started at 50 mg per day or 5 days ollowing a

    spontaneous or progestin-induced withdrawal

    bleeding. The recommended maximum dose is 150

    mg per day as there was no clear evidence o e-

    icacy at higher doses and the US Food and Drug

    Administration (FDA) recommended a maximum o

    750 mg per treatment cycle.27 Starting rom day 2,

    3, 4 or 5 o the cycle was not shown to inluence

    the results.36

    Ovulation usually occurs within 510 days

    ater the last tablet. I there is no ovulation, the

    dose is increased at increments o 50 mg per cycle

    until ovulation occurs, or a maximum dose o 150

    mg daily is reached.

    While 50 mg per day is the recommended dose

    in the irst cycle, a meta-analysis o 13 publishedreports suggests that only 46% will ovulate at this

    dose, a urther 21% will respond to 100 mg and

    another 8% will ovulate with 150 mg per day. 37

    Although results o large trials suggest that

    monitoring by ultrasound or progesterone is not

    mandatory to ensure good outcome,17 it is recom-

    mended to monitor the response at least during the

    irst treatment cycle to ensure that an appropriate

    dose is received.38 Transvaginal pelvic ultrasound

    should be used to monitor ollicular growth and

    endometrial thickness. Patients who have no or

    excessive response to the current dose o CC and

    show reduced endometrial thickness can be identi-

    ied. Serum progesterone concentrations could also

    be measured in mid-luteal phase to check or ovula-

    tion.

    Duration of treatment. Treatment should

    generally be limited to six (ovulatory) cycles. 39 A

    course o six ovulatory cycles is usually suicient

    to know i pregnancy will be achieved. Studies have

    reported that 7187.5% o pregnancies achieved

    with CC occur within the irst three cycles o treat-

    ment.16,40,41

    Further cycles (with a maximum o 12 in to-tal) may be considered on an individual basis ater

    discussion with the patient. However, second-line

    treatment should be considered or patients not

    conceiving ater six ovulatory cycles o CC.

    Further use o CC beyond 12 cycles has been

    ound to be associated with an increased risk o

    ovarian cancer (relative risk [RR], 11.1; 95% coni-

    dence interval [CI], 1.582.3)42 and is thus not rec-

    ommended.

    Results. A compilation o published results

    rom 5,268 patients revealed an ovulation rate o

    73% per patient, pregnancy rate o 36% per pa-

    tient, and live birth rate o 29% per patient.39

    A Cochrane meta-analysis43 o three stud-

    ies 4446 comparing CC versus placebo in patients

    with anovulatory subertility showed a large and

    consistent beneit o CC compared with placebo

    (odds ratio [OR], 5.77; 95% CI, 1.5521.48; P 4 cm, > 75% eacement) in spon-

    taneous labour have a twoold increase in

    success rate.1315

    Induction o labour or maternal or

    etal condition is increasingly common in

    obstetric practice. Labour induction and

    augmentation in women with previous

    caesarean delivery is associated with an

    increased risk o uterine rupture. The risk

    is highest with misoprostol (6%), ollowed

    by prostaglandin E2

    (2%) and lowest with

    oxytocin (1.1%).16 All the three organiza-

    tions discouraged the use o misoprostol

    and prostaglandins in most women with

    previous caesarean delivery.

    Studies on mechanical cervical ripen-

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    55/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 48

    ing and labour induction with transcervical

    catheter were limited and retrospective. The

    risk on uterine rupture was inconclusive.1

    Induced labour is also associated

    with lower success rate o VBAC com-

    pared with spontaneous labour. I oxytocin

    was used alone or induction or augmen-

    tation, the vaginal delivery rate was 62%

    (95% conidence interval, CI, 5370%) and

    68% (95% CI, 6472%), respectively.17

    Although induction o labour is not

    contraindicated in women with prior cae-

    sarean delivery, the act o lower success

    rate together with higher rupture risk

    should be considered in the counselling.

    Nonetheless, individual circumstanc-

    es must be considered in all cases. For ex-

    ample, i a patient, who may not otherwisebe a candidate or planned VBAC, presents

    in advanced labour, obstetricians may judge

    it best to proceed with vaginal delivery.

    MATERNAL BENEFIT AND

    RISK

    Both planned VBAC and ERCS carry mater-

    nal and neonatal risks. The risks o either

    approach include maternal haemorrhage,

    inection, operative injury, thromboembo-

    lism, hysterectomy, and death. The risk

    o uterine rupture is essentially limited

    to the VBAC group. As successul VBAC

    is associated with the least complications

    while a ailed one with more complica-

    tions, careul selection o women who

    would most likely deliver vaginally is the

    key to management o pregnancy aterprior caesarean section.

    Short term

    Successul VBAC oers several distinct,

    consistently reproducible short-term ad-

    vantages compared with ERCS, such as

    ewer hysterectomies, ewer thromboem-

    bolic events, lower blood transusion rate,

    and shorter hospital stay. However, when

    VBAC ails, emergency caesarean section

    is associated with increased uterine rup-

    ture, hysterectomy, operative injury, blood

    transusion, endometritis, and longer hos-

    pital stay.18 At present, clinical prediction

    o the optimal candidate or planned VBAC

    remains imprecise.

    Long term

    It is well-known that caesarean delivery

    increases the risk o long-term problems.

    Chronic pain is a common condition expe-rienced by some women ater caesarean

    delivery. The risk appears to be higher

    with increasing number o operations

    perormed. A group in Denmark ollowed

    up 244 women or chronic pain ater cae-

    sarean section. O those women, 18.6%

    had pain ater 3 months and 12.3% still

    suered rom pain at 10 months ater de-

    livery. Furthermore, 5.9% o the women

    characterized their pain as being present

    daily or almost daily.19 One o the causes

    o moderate to severe pelvic pain was

    neuropathic pain caused by entrapment o

    iliohypogastric or ilioinguinal nerves.20

    As with chronic pain, pelvic adhe-

    sions increase with the number o cae-

    sarean sections. Dense adhesions make

    subsequent operation more diicult, and

    increase the operating time, blood lossand the risk o injury to the surrounding or-

    gans.20 Adhesions were assessed in a co-

    hort study involving 3,190 women in Saudi

    Arabia.21 Adhesions were described as se-

    vere i they were dense or causing usion

    o uterus to the abdominal wall or blad-

    der. In that study, severe adhesions were

    present in 0.2%, 11.5%, 26.0%, 44.8%,

    54.5% and 50.6% o women having their

    irst, second, third, ourth, ith, and sixth

    or more caesarean sections, respectively.

    A strong association exists between

    previous caesarean delivery and abnormal

    placentation. A meta-analysis perormed

    by Ananth et al22 showed that a woman

    with at least one previous caesarean

    was at 2.6 times greater risk o placenta

    previa in her subsequent pregnancy. The

    risk increased with the number o prior

    Both planned vaginal birth after previouscaesarean section and elective repeatcaesarean section carry maternal andneonatal risks.

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    56/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 49

    Continuing MedicalEducation

    caesarean sections.

    The most signiicant long-term risk ocaesarean delivery is placenta accreta oc-

    curring in subsequent pregnancies. As the

    placenta does not properly separate rom

    the uterus ater delivery, it may result in

    massive bleeding, leading to disseminated

    intravascular coagulopathy, multi-organ

    ailure and maternal mortality. Even i cae-

    sarean hysterectomy is to be perormed as

    the lie-saving procedure, the operation

    could be diicult with its own set o com-

    plications and results in permanent loss o

    ertility.20 As with previa, it is certain that

    the risk o placental accreta increases with

    the number o prior caesarean sections.

    The combination o placenta previa and

    previous caesarean delivery dramatically

    increases the risk urther. In a cohort study

    o 723 women with placenta previa, ac-

    creta occurred in 3%, 11%, 40%, 61% and67% o those having their irst, second,

    third, ourth, and ith or more caesarean

    sections, respectively.23

    FETALBENEFITANDRISK

    Perinatal morbidity and mortality are other

    concerns when considering the option o

    delivery. The largest population-based

    evaluation o perinatal mortality was per-

    ormed by Smith et al.24 The rate o deliv-

    ery-related perinatal death was signii-

    cantly greater in the VBAC group than in the

    ERCS group (12.9 vs 1.1 per 10,000 births).

    The marked excess o perinatal deaths was

    mainly due to uterine rupture in the VBAC

    group. What urther complicated the rela-

    tive risk is that elective caesarean delivery

    at 39 weeks gestation would prevent two

    etal deaths per 1,000 live births compared

    with expectant management.As with perinatal death, asphyxia-

    related injury in VBAC usually occurs a-

    ter uterine rupture. In a study by Landon

    et al,25 the incidence o hypoxic ischemic

    encephalopathy was 0.08% in the VBAC

    group compared with 0% in the ERCS

    group, at a background uterine rupture rate

    o 0.7%.

    Sepsis is a requent indication or

    admission to the neonatal intensive care

    unit. Both maternal ever and prolonged

    rupture o membrane greater than 18 hours

    are more common in the VBAC group.

    Neonates who were born ater ailed VBAC

    requiring emergency caesarean delivery

    had a signiicantly greater rate o suspect-

    ed sepsis.26

    Although the evidence suggests an

    increased perinatal risk or women un-dergoing VBAC, the absolute numbers o

    serious morbidity and mortality remain

    low. One should also note that a large

    proportion o women undergoing VBAC

    would deliver successully. In act, there

    are numerous beneicial eects o labour

    and vaginal delivery to the newborn. Even

    at term gestation, babies born vaginally

    are at lower risk o respiratory morbidity

    (respiratory distress syndrome or transient

    tachypnoea o newborn) compared with

    those born by prelabour caesarean sec-

    tion.27,28 This inding was demonstrated by

    a large cohort study29 in Denmark involving

    34,458 babies over 9 years. The risk o res-

    piratory morbidity or inants delivered by

    elective caesarean section was increased

    compared with that by the vaginal route at

    37 weeks gestation (odds ratio, OR, 3.9;

    95% CI, 2.46.5), 38 weeks gestation (OR,

    3.0; 95% CI, 2.14.3) and 39 weeks gesta-tion (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.23.0). A same

    pattern was observed or risk o serious

    respiratory morbidity at an even higher

    odds ratio at 37 weeks gestation (OR 5.0;

    95% CI, 1.616.0). This is the reason why

    most authorities recommend that ERCS be

    perormed ater 39 weeks gestation. Other

    potential beneits o vaginal delivery are

    the lower risk o hypothermia and hypoten-

    sion at birth, higher likelihood o success-

    ul breasteeding, and lower incidence o

    asthma in childhood.28

    NON-MEDICALFACTORS

    Despite the numerous research-based evi-

    dence on the saety o trial o labour ater

    caesarean section, the VBAC rate remains

    low in some developed countries such asthe United States (8.5% in 2006). It is ap-

    parent that some non-clinical actors play

    a role in the decision-making.

    The actors which might aect VBAC

    rate in an institution include administrative

    policies, medicolegal pressures, proes-

    sional society guidelines, and patient and

    obstetrician preerences.

    According to a survey by Wells30 in the

    United States, reasons or obstetricians

    not oering VBAC included (1) them be-

    ing unwilling to accept the risk o adverse

    outcome, (2) them not believing that VBAC

    is sae, (3) medico-legal liability concerns,

    and (4) lack o immediate availability o a-

    cilities or laparotomy.

    The decision may also be aected by

    non-clinical patient priorities, such as pa-

    tients desire or a vaginal delivery, her

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    57/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 50

    wish to experience (or avoid) labour, her

    need or scheduling the delivery, and herpositive or negative eeling about the pre-

    vious delivery.31 It is important to discuss

    with the women their risk perception and

    priorities when considering the mode o

    delivery.

    COUNSELLING AND

    DECISION-MAKING

    Depending on the clinical situation, either

    planned VBAC or ERCS is usually appropri-

    ate or most women with prior caesarean

    delivery. Understanding the womens be-

    lies and values o the process and out-

    come is essential in providing evidence-

    based, patient-centred care.32 Discussing

    the options in early pregnancy allows the

    women and their amily to evaluate the

    risks and beneits based on their ownperception. While patient pamphlets play

    an important role in general inormation-

    giving, the obstetricians advice should

    be more speciic to the individuals condi-

    tion. The decision made in early pregnancy

    should never be considered inal, as medi-

    cal and social circumstances continue to

    evolve. For instance, women who intend to

    deliver by ERCS might present with spon-

    taneous labour beore the scheduled date.

    I labour progresses well and the chance

    o a successul VBAC is high, she might

    change her preerence to vaginal delivery.

    According to the international guidelines,

    ERCS should be scheduled ater 39 weeks

    gestation in an otherwise uncomplicated

    pregnancy.1

    I a woman does not show any strong

    preerence regarding the mode o delivery

    in early pregnancy, planned VBAC could be

    encouraged with the lexibility o a laterchange o plan. A local study has been

    conducted to assess the psychological im-

    pact o women being assigned to the mode

    o delivery.33 It involved 298 women, who

    showed no preerence or VBAC or ERCS,

    being randomly assigned to either option

    with lexibility. Women in the planned

    VBAC group achieved high success rate o

    vaginal delivery (73%) without an increase

    in the psychological stress and morbidity.

    EXPERIENCE FROM A PUBLIC

    OBSTETRIC UNIT

    Kwong Wah Hospital is one o the eight

    public hospitals in the Hong Kong terri-

    tory providing obstetric service. There are

    almost 6,000 deliveries annually. Women

    receive obstetric service at minimal per-

    sonal cost, as the service is largely unded

    by the government. Obstetricians and mid-

    wives are salaried, and the advices given

    are thereore not inluenced by personal

    inancial gain. Women with history oprior caesarean deliveries are assessed by

    obstetricians at the booking visit. The pre-

    vious operation records are traced via the

    electronic system o the public hospitals

    or by an enquiry letter to the correspond-

    ing obstetricians/hospitals. Planned VBAC

    is oered to women with one previous

    uncomplicated transverse lower segment

    caesarean delivery. Inormation pamphlets

    on planned VBAC and ERCS are given out

    during antenatal visits. The pregnancy

    conditions are continuously reviewed. The

    mode o delivery is discussed beore 37

    weeks gestation and documented in the

    record. Women who have no strong pre-

    erence or either option are encouraged to

    consider planned VBAC when the pregnan-

    cy conditions are avourable. Women who

    intend to undergo ERCS are orewarned oa possible re-evaluation o the mode o

    delivery i they present themselves in an

    advanced stage o labour. All women at-

    tempting VBAC receive electronic continu-

    ous etal heart monitoring during labour.

    Labour progress is assessed regularly by

    the obstetricians. Facilities and expertise

    or emergency operation are available in

    the delivery suite. The authors experience

    over a 4-year period is shown in the Table.

    CONCLUSION

    At present, there is no reliable ormula

    to calculate the best mode o delivery

    in women with prior caesarean section.

    This should be a shared decision made by

    the obstetricians and the women, in-

    corporating medical actors, social

    Successful VBAC carries

    thelowestrisk,

    followedbyERCS,

    andtheriskishighest

    withfailedVBAC,

    requiring caesarean

    delivery.

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    58/59

    JPOG JAN/FEB 2012 51

    REFERENCES

    1. American College o Obstetricians and Gynecolo-

    gists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth

    ater previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol

    2010;116:450463.

    2. Bujold E. Evaluating proessional society guide-

    lines on vaginal birth ater cesarean. Semin Perina-

    tol 2010;34:314317.

    3. Pruett KM, Kirshon B, Cotton DB, Poindexter AN

    3rd. Is vaginal birth ater two or more cesarean

    sections sae? Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:163165.

    4. Beall M, Eglinton GS, Clark PL, Phelan JP.

    Vaginal delivery ater cesarean section in women

    with unknown types o uterine scar. J Reprod Med

    1984;29:3135.

    5. Royal College o Obstetricians and Gynaeco-

    logists. Birth ater previous caesarean section

    (Green-top 45). Available at http://www.rcog.org.

    uk. Published February 1, 2007.

    6. Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Steven E, Peipert JF,

    Macones G. The eect o birth weight on vaginal

    birth ater cesarean delivery success rates. Am J

    Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:824830.

    7. Jastrow N, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ. Eect o

    birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vagi-

    nal birth ater cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol

    2010;115:338343.

    8. Peaceman AM, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, et al.

    The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact o etal size

    on trial o labor success or patients with previ-

    ous cesarean or dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol

    2006;195:11271131.

    9. Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Sammel MD, et al.

    Vaginal birth ater caesarean delivery: does mater-

    nal age aect saety and success? Paediatr Perinat

    Epidemiol 2007;21:114120.

    10. Shanks AL, Cahill AG. Delivery ater prior

    cesarean: success rate and actors. Clin Perinatol

    2011;38:233245.

    11. Juhasz G, Gyam C, Gynm P, Tocce K, Stone

    J. Eect o body mass index and excessive weight

    gain on success o vagina birth ater cesarean deliv-

    ery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:741746.

    12. Durnwald CP, Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM. The

    impact o maternal obesity and weight gain on

    vaginal birth ater cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet

    Gynecol 2004;191:954957.

    13. Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, et al.

    New insights on vaginal birth ater cesarean: can

    it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:967981.

    14. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The

    MFMU Cesarean Registry: actors aecting the

    success o trial o labor ater previous cesarean

    delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1016

    1023.

    15. Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth ater cesar-

    ean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet

    Gynecol 1997;90:907910.

    16. Cheng YW, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L,

    Caughey AB, Guise JM. Delivery ater prior cesar-

    ean: maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perina-

    tol 2011;38:297309.

    17. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal Birth

    Ater Cesarean: New Insights. Evidence report/

    Technology Assessment No. 191. Rockville, MD:

    Agency or Healthcare Research & Quality; 2010.

    18. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cahill AG, Spong CY. Birth

    ater previous cesarean delivery: short-term mater-

    nal outcome. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:249257.

    19. Nikoajsen L, Sorensen HC, Jensen TS,

    Kehlet H. Chronic pain ollowing Caesarean

    section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:

    111116.

    20. Silver RM. Delivery ater previous cesarean:

    long-term maternal outcomes. Semin Perinatol

    2010;34:258266.

    21. Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA,

    Roomi F, Ghabra T. Multiple cesarean section

    morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;87:

    227232.

    22. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The

    association o placenta previa with history o cesar-

    ean delivery and abortion: a meta-analysis. Am J

    Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:10711078.

    23. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Mater-

    nal morbidity associated with multiple cesarean

    deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:12261232.

    24. Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R.

    Risk o perinatal death associated with labor ater

    previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term

    pregnancies. JAMA 2002;287:26842690.

    25. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Mater-

    nal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial

    o labor ater prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med

    2004;351:25812589.

    26. Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, Fanaro A, Hack M.

    Neonatal morbidity ater elective repeat cesarean

    section and trial o labor. Pediatrics 1997;100:348

    353.

    27. Patel RM, Jain L. Delivery ater previous cesar-

    ean: short-term perinatal outcomes. Semin Perina-

    tol 2010;34:272280.

    28. Sinha A, Bewley S, McIntosh T. Myth: babies

    would choose prelabour caesarean section. Semin

    Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;16:247253.

    29. Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen

    TB. Risk o respiratory morbidity in term inants

    delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort

    study. BMJ 2008;336:8587.

    30. Wells CE. Vaginal birth ater cesarean delivery:

    views rom the private practitioner. Semin Perinatol

    2010;34:345350.

    31. Sharma PS, Eden KB, Guise JM, Jimison HB,

    Dolan JG. Subjective risk vs. objective risk can

    lead to dierent post-cesarean birth decisions

    based on multiattribute modeling. J Clin Epidemiol

    2011;64:6778.

    32. Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Understand-

    ing risk, patient and provider preerences,

    and obstetrical decision making: approach

    to delivery ater cesarean. Semin Perinatol

    2010;34:331336.

    33. Law LW, Pang MW, Chung TKH. Randomised

    trial o assigned mode o delivery ater a previous

    cesarean sectionimpact on maternal psycho-

    logical dynamics. J Matern Fetal Neonatol Med

    2010;23:11061113.

    circumstances and patients preerences.

    Successul VBAC carries the lowest risk,ollowed by ERCS, and the risk is high-

    est with ailed VBAC, requiring caesarean

    delivery.

    Although uterine rupture increases

    the risk o adverse outcome, it is still a rare

    complication in high-resource settings.

    The incidence has remained the same

    (< 1%) in UK, where the rate o primary

    caesarean section has increased over thepast decade. Moreover, the resulting seri-

    ous adverse outcome ater uterine rupture

    is very low in absolute number.

    Given the high success rate o VBAC

    in careully selected pregnancies, obste-

    tricians should not overstate the risk and

    consequence o uterine rupture so as to

    turn women away rom attempting VBAC

    without balancing the short- and long-term complications o ERCS.

    AbouttheAuthorsDr Yung is Associate Consultant, Dr Lau is Consultant, and

    Dr Leung is Chie o Service at the Department o Obstet-

    rics and Gynaecology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.

  • 7/22/2019 JPOG February 2012 HK

    59/59

    CME Questions

    This continuing medical education service is brought to you by the Medical Progress Institute, an institutededicated to CME learning. Read the article Management of Pregnancies With Previous Caesarean

    Section and answer the following questions. This JPOGarticle has been accredited for CME by the Hong

    Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

    CME Answers for JPOG Nov/Dec 2011Name in BLOCK CAPITALS:

    CME Article

    Management of Pregnancies With Previous Caesarean Section

    Answer True or False to the questions below.

    1. Previous classical caesarean section is a contraindication to planned vaginal birth ater previouscaesarean section (VBAC).

    2. Patients with unknown type o previous caesarean scar should not be oered planned VBAC.

    3. Obese patients (body mass index, BMI, > 30) should not be oered planned VBAC, as high BMI isassociated with a low success rate.

    4. Spontaneous labour increases the likelihood o successul VBAC.

    5. Continuous electronic etal monitoring should be oered to all women attempting VBAC.

    6. Labour induction and augmentation by oxytocin are associated with increased risk o uterine rupture in

    patients with prior caesarean delivery.

    7. The risk o placenta previa/placenta accreta is directly related to the number o previous caesareandeliveries.

    8. Perinatal mortality and asphyxia-related etal injury are more signifcant in the VBAC group comparedwith the elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) group.

    9. Babies who are born vaginally are at lower risk o respiratory morbidity in both the short and long term.

    10. Women who decline planned VBAC should be oered ERCS at 37 weeks gestation in order to avoidspontaneous labour beore the scheduled operation.

    True False