joint capabilities integration and development system (jcids) nov 2010

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)

Nov 2010

• The Requirements Environment• Sequence of events

– Analysis– Initial Documentation– Transitions to actions that provide solutions

• Non-Materiel solutions• JCIDS interactions with developing materiel

solutions• Requirements Approval structure

Developing Requirements

2

The Requirements Environment

Finding the balance between:COCOM near-term

requirements to support CONPLANs and current

missions

andServices’ long range vision & investment

plans

Versatile, joint systems and

Growing demandsFiscal & political

constraintsand

Systems optimized for service missions

Geographic specificity and Worldwide applicability

Ambitious requirements Achievable acquisition strategy

and

Quantity matters High-end capabilitiesand

3

JCIDS-Tab 2

• LRIP• FOT&E

• Affordable military-useful increment

• Technology demonstrated

• Initial KPPs/KSAs

• TEMP• SEP

MS “B”

• Revise KPPs/KSAs

• Detailed design

• System integration

• TEMP• DT&E

MS “C”

Develop, Test & Produce

MS “A”

Evolutionary Acquisition

Materiel Solution Analysis

Technology Development

Engineering & Manufacturing Development

Production & Deployment

CDD CPD

• Capabilities• Tasks• Attributes• Metrics

• Gaps• Shortfalls• Redundancies• Risk areas

• Non-materiel solutions

• Potential Materiel approaches

• S&T initiatives• Experimentation

SECDEF

Select JointIntegrating Concept

• GDF• Defense

Planning Scenarios

• Family of Concepts

• Transforma-tion

oversight

activity

Capabilities-Based Assessment

PolicyCapabilities Definition

Develop CONOPS

COCOM

OSD (AT&L)

COCOMs

USMC

Army

Navy

Air Force

DIA

OSD (NII)

OSD (PA&E)

FCB


Select Materiel Solution

JCIDS and Acquisition

• LRIP• IOT&E

MaterielDevelopmentDecision

ServicesOSD/JCS

• Analysis of Alternatives

• Technology Development Strategy

• Test & Eval Strategy

• SoS System Engineering

ICD

OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC)

Analysis ofAlternatives

CompetitivePrototyping

Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD

Getting the front end right is key

4

JCIDS-Tab 2


NEEDS

GAPS

SOLUTIONS

ExistingGuidance

The problemsand the risks

What we need for the mission

What should wedo about it?

Where does this need rank?

How soon do we need it?

JCIDS Review

5

• CBA Recommendations:– Transformational solutions– Evolution of existing capabilities– Information technology solutions

• Information for an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)• Managers must communicate to avoid disconnects

over seams between JCIDS, DAS, and PPBE

• CBA Documentation:– Initial Capabilities Document– DOTmLPF Change Recommendation

Identifying Needs and Potential Solutions

6

CBA Output Documents

• Initial Capabilities Document (MS A)– Documents Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA)

Results – specifically Capability Gaps– Identifies relevant operational performance

attributes– Documents the recommendation on the need for a

materiel solution and potential non-material solutions

– Predecessor for the Capabilities Development Document

– Key review question: How to prioritize warfighting gaps?

7

Operational Performance Attributes

• Attributes necessary to design a proposed system• Establish a performance baseline• Guide development and demonstration• Guide development of Key Performance Parameters

(KPPs) for inclusion in Capabilities Development Document

8

CBA Output Documents

• Joint DCR – DOTmLPF Change Request– When DoD Decides a Joint Non- Materiel Solution is

appropriate– Non-Materiel Solutions

• Change policy• Change doctrine• Reorganize• Train and educate DOD personnel differently• Acquire commercial or non-developmental items• Acquire more quantities of existing items• Add or reassign personnel• Move or realign facilities

– Sometimes Called DOT_LPF

9

• LRIP• FOT&E




• TEMP• SEP

MS “B”


• Detailed design


• TEMP• DT&E

MS “C”


MS “A”






CDD CPD






SECDEF


• GDF• Defense

Planning Scenarios


• Transforma-tion

oversight

activity



Develop CONOPS

COCOM

OSD (AT&L)

COCOMs

USMC

Army

Navy

Air Force

DIA

OSD (NII)

OSD (PA&E)

FCB




• LRIP• IOT&E


ServicesOSD/JCS

COCOM/Service

Near-term Capabilities

As part of the agile process

IPLs, OCO, DCRs, JCTDs, JUONs, etc.

PPBE (PDM, PBD)

JRAC





ICD





10

Key JCIDS Development Documents

• Capability Development Document (MS B)– Defines Performance Requirements to Achieve the

Capability• Identifies KPPs, KSAs, and additional attributes• Attributes should be Authoritative, Measurable and Testable

– Describes DOTMLPF and Policy Constraints associated with the solution

– May describe multiple increments– Provides operational capabilities for the acquisition

strategy and the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)– Insert all CDD KPPs and Sustainment KSAs verbatim into

the APB

11

• Attributes or characteristics of a system• Critical or essential

– To develop an effective military capability– To make a significant contribution to the characteristics of the

future joint force• KPPs must be testable

– Enable feedback from T&E• Mandatory vs. Selectively applied KPPs

– Net Ready KPP, Sustainment KPP– Training KPP, Energy Efficiency KPP

• Validated by the JROC for JROC interest documents• Failure to meet a KPP results in reevaluation or reassessment

of the program

Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)

12

Key System Attributes (KSAs)

• Attributes most critical or essential• Not selected as a KPP• An additional level of capability prioritization below

the KPP• Only senior leadership can change a KSA

– Sponsor 4-star– Defense Agency Commander– Principal Staff Assistant

13

JCIDS-Tab 2

• LRIP• FOT&E




• TEMP• SEP

MS “B”


• Detailed design


• TEMP• DT&E

MS “C”


MS “A”






CDD CPD






SECDEF


• GDF• Defense

Planning Scenarios


• Transforma-tion

oversight

activity



Develop CONOPS

COCOM

OSD (AT&L)

COCOMs

USMC

Army

Navy

Air Force

DIA

OSD (NII)

OSD (PA&E)

FCB



• LRIP• IOT&E


ServicesOSD/JCS

COCOM/Service




PPBE (PDM, PBD)

JRAC





ICD






14

Key JCIDS Development Documents

• Capability Production Document (MS C)– Supports Production and Development of one

increment– Documents Authoritative, Testable Capabilities – Support Production, Testing, and Deployment

• May describe Incremental Production and Deployment

– No New Requirements– Must meet Operational Performance Attributes

15

JCIDS-Tab 2

• LRIP• FOT&E




• TEMP• SEP

MS “B”


• Detailed design


• TEMP• DT&E

MS “C”


MS “A”






CDD CPD






SECDEF


• GDF• Defense

Planning Scenarios


• Transforma-tion

oversight

activity



Develop CONOPS

COCOM

OSD (AT&L)

COCOMs

USMC

Army

Navy

Air Force

DIA

OSD (NII)

OSD (PA&E)

FCB



• LRIP• IOT&E


ServicesOSD/JCS

COCOM/Service




PPBE (PDM, PBD)

JRAC





ICD






16

JCIDS-Tab 2

Differences Between the CDD and the CPD

CDD CPD

Focus on Design Focus on Production

All Increments A Specific Increment

KPPs to Help Evaluate Alternative Designs

KPPs Refined and Tailored to the Proposed System

17

JCIDS-Tab 2

JCB

JROCJROC

CJCSCJCS

FCB WG

FCB

ADVICE TO SECDEF

RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL/

FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY

TOP LEVEL GUIDANCE

ISSUE DEVELOPMENT

ANALYTIC FOUNDATION

INITIAL ISSUE REVIEW

JROC DECISION CHAIN

JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight CouncilJCB: Joint Capabilities BoardFCB: Functional Capabilities BoardFCB WG: Functional Capabilities Board Working Group

JROC MEMBERSHIP

Chair: VCJCS

Council Members:

• Vice Chief of Staff, Army

• Vice Chief of Naval Operations

• Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force

• Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps

COCOMs must be consulted and have a standing invitation to attend all JROC sessions; AT&L, CAPE, and Comptroller attend as JROC advisors

Requirements Decision Chain

18

JCIDS-Tab 2

JCB

JROCJROC

CJCSCJCS

FCB WG

FCB

ADVICE TO SECDEF

RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL/

FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY

TOP LEVEL GUIDANCE

ISSUE DEVELOPMENT

ANALYTIC FOUNDATION

INITIAL ISSUE REVIEW

JROC DECISION CHAIN

JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight CouncilJCB: Joint Capabilities BoardFCB: Functional Capabilities BoardFCB WG: Functional Capabilities Board Working Group

JROC MEMBERSHIP

Chair: VCJCS

Council Members:

• Vice Chief of Staff, Army

• Vice Chief of Naval Operations

• Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force

• Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps

COCOMs have a standing invitation toattend all JROC sessions. CAPE, AT&L and Comptroller are formal advisors

JROC Organization

19

JCIDS-Tab 2

Functional Capability Boards

Command & Control

LogisticsBattlespace Awareness

Force Application

Net-Centric BuildingPartnerships

Force Support

Protection

ASD NII/ DOD CIO OSD(P)D, CAPE DOT&EDIA Rep (Threat)ODNI/IRB Other DoD Agencies as necessary

FCB Membership: (O-6 level – not all-inclusive)ServicesCombatant Command RepsOSD (AT&L)OSD (I)Comptroller

20

JCIDS-Tab 2

• Perform an initial review of all JCIDS proposals• Support provided by J6, J8, FCB WGs

• The Gatekeeper will determine: • Joint Potential Designator

• JROC Interest• JCB Interest• Joint Integration• Joint Information• Independent

• Lead and supporting Functional Capabilities Boards

• Formal Staffing begins after Gatekeeper decisions

JCIDS Gatekeeper

21

JCIDS-Tab 2

JCIDS Tracks

Joint Integration

Joint Information

Independent

Staffing Certification

Staffing

SponsorSponsor

SponsorSponsor

SponsorSponsor

JROC Interest

Staffing FCB Review JCB JROCJROC

ACAT I proposals

ACAT II & III proposals requiring certifications only

JCB Interest Staffing

FCB Review JCBJCB

ACAT II & III proposals requiring a joint review

ACAT II & III proposals with multi-component interest

ACAT II & III component unique proposals

Tripwires FCB Review JCB JROCJROC

ACAT I programs with 10% cost growth

ValidationAuthority

ValidationAuthority

22

• The need for flexible capabilities• Begin with analysis• Analysis leads to action• Non-Materiel solutions

– The DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR)

• Materiel solutions– Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)– Capability Development Document (CDD)– Capability Production Document (CPD)

• Process is under review to improve timeliness and aid in improved acquisition performance

JCIDS Summary

23