john jacob handout

32

Upload: hayley-pallister

Post on 06-Jul-2015

648 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

John Jacob handout Gulf Coast Green Symposium 2009, Houston, Texas

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: John Jacob Handout
Page 2: John Jacob Handout
Page 3: John Jacob Handout
Page 4: John Jacob Handout
Page 5: John Jacob Handout
Page 6: John Jacob Handout
Page 7: John Jacob Handout

Protecting Water Resources with Higher-Density Development

Lynn Richards. 2006. EPA 231-R-06-001

Page 8: John Jacob Handout

25.0

12.5

6.33.1 1.6 0.8 0.4

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

4 8 16 32 64 128 256

Acres/100 units

DUA Ia

4 0.3

8 0.45

16 0.60

32 0.70

64 0.80

128 0.90

256 1.00

DUA

Page 9: John Jacob Handout

Tysons Corner, VA 1DUA

Page 10: John Jacob Handout

Houston, TX 4-5 DUA

Page 11: John Jacob Handout

8-9 DUA

Page 12: John Jacob Handout

Civano, Tuscon. 18DUA

Page 13: John Jacob Handout

New Orleans, French Quarter, 38 DUA

Page 14: John Jacob Handout

Dallas—Mockingbird Station, 64 DUA

Page 15: John Jacob Handout

199 DUA

Page 16: John Jacob Handout

4

8

16

32

64128

256

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

cf/a

cre

/ye

ar

DUA

Runoff Volume per acre versus DUA

Page 17: John Jacob Handout

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

4 8 16 32 64 128 256

lbs/

year

/acr

e

DUA

Pollutant Load (lbs/year/acre)

TN

TSS/100

TP

Page 18: John Jacob Handout

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Runoff Volume per 100 unitscf

÷1

00

0/1

00

un

its/

ye

ar

Page 19: John Jacob Handout

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

4 8 16 32 64 128 256

lbs

TN/1

00

un

its/

year

DUA

TN per 100 Units

20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%

Page 20: John Jacob Handout
Page 21: John Jacob Handout

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

lower

Stormwater Dry Ponds

upper

lower

Stormwater Wetlands

upper

lower

Infiltration Practices

upper

lower

Water Quality Swales

upper

TSS

TP

TN

BMP % Pollutant Removal, median, 25th and 75th percentilesNational Pollutant Removal Performance Database, Center for Stormwater Protection, 2007

Page 22: John Jacob Handout

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4 8 16 32 64 128 256

DUA

%Reduction Runoff Volume versus 4DUA

Page 23: John Jacob Handout

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4 8 16 32 64 128 256

Pe

rce

nt

load

re

du

ctio

n

DUA

% Load Reduction, Density vs. 4DUA

TN

TP

TSS

Page 24: John Jacob Handout

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

4 8 16 32 64 128 256

% r

ed

uct

ion

ve

rsu

s 4

DU

A

DUA

% Load Reduction for TN, Density versus 4DUA

High Ia

EMC Default

High EMC and Ia

Page 25: John Jacob Handout
Page 26: John Jacob Handout

Henry David Thoreau

Jennifer Lorenz

Page 27: John Jacob Handout
Page 28: John Jacob Handout
Page 29: John Jacob Handout

Good

Fair

Poor

Watershed Impervious

Cover

Str

eam

Qu

ality

Urban Drainage

Impervious Cover Model

10% 25% 40% 60% 100%

Center for Watershed Protection

Page 30: John Jacob Handout

Good

Fair

Poor

Watershed Impervious

Cover

Str

eam

Qu

ality

Urban Drainage

Impervious Cover Model

10% 25% 40% 60% 100%

Center for Watershed ProtectionDwelling Units per Acre

Urb

an

ity

0.001 0.1 2 4 6 8 32 64 100+

Page 31: John Jacob Handout

Good

Fair

Poor

Str

eam

Qu

ality

maximum repair—LID etc

Urb

an

ity

Dwelling Units per Acre

0.001 0.1 2 4 6 8 32 64 100+

Impervious Cover Model

Page 32: John Jacob Handout