joey wisby gis manager tennessee chapter of the nature conservancy
TRANSCRIPT
Mapping and PrioritizingHabitat Restoration
with the Tennessee State Wildlife Action
Plan
Joey WisbyGIS Manager
Tennessee Chapter ofThe Nature Conservancy
Relational Databases(MS Access)
Data Management Modeling Input/Output
GIS(ArcGIS)
Spatial Relationships Mapping Results Visualizatioin/Interaction
TN Plan Database Concept
Capture & Organize Information about 8 Elements Detailed Comprehensive Spatially Explicit
Define relationships between elements
Use models to allow evaluation and prioritization
Observations of Conservation Target Species
Sources:• TDEC Natural Heritage• TVA Heritage• TWRA Non-Game Inventory Program• TWRA Aquatic Database (TADS)• Scientific Collection Permits• Various Others – BISON, etc.
Faunal Group
2005 2013
Aquatic 5,268 22,035
Subterranean
961 6,000+
Terrestrial 19,396 47,525
Mollusk Hosts
n/a 131,008
Prioritization and Weighting of GCN Species Observations
Species Conservation Priority Score:• Weight by Rarity/Legal Status• G Rank (40 pts)• S Rank (40 pts)• Federal Status (10 pts)• TN State Status (10 pts)• Exponential (G1 = 40, G2 = 20, G3 = 10, etc)
•Viability/Confidence Scores for Observations• Last Observation Date (old records, less points)• Heritage EO Ranks Where Available
Linking GCN Species Observations to Habitats
• Terrestrial Occurrences Linked to 700-acre hexagon clusters called rosettes
• Aquatic Occurrences Linked to NHDPlus Flowlines & Associated Catchments
• Subterranean Observations Linked to Cave Systems• Cave system entrances linked to 100-acre hexagons
Evaluating Terrestrial Habitat Restoration Priorities
• Assume mapped semi-natural habitat restored to dominant matrix forest type within subregion
• Use restored habitat preference scores (P) for existing GCN occurrences in/around semi-natural habitat
Net Restoration Priority =
Restored Score – Current Semi-natural Score
If had antecedent or other potential restoration habitat map, could use to dictate restoration scenario