job usmevals axa060 evals usmscan date … of academic assess… · how clearly were the objectives...

// JOB USMEVALS AXA060 EVALS USMSCAN DATE 01/22/2008,16:07:28,FORM G0 ,VMID VSE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 40 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E CMS 102 G2514 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.20 1.46 0.790 1 27 7 4 1 0 (2.5%) (67.5%) (17.5%) (10.0%) (2.5%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.26 1.51 0.790 1 25 9 4 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (2.5%) (62.5%) (22.5%) (10.0%) (2.5%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.13 1.28 0.605 1 30 8 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.5%) (75.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (2.5%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.45 1.68 0.933 2 20 13 3 1 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (5.0%) (50.0%) (32.5%) (7.5%) (2.5%) (2.5%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.72 1.76 0.751 2 15 18 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.0%) (37.5%) (45.0%) (10.0%) (2.5%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.50 1.74 0.818 1 19 11 9 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (2.5%) (47.5%) (27.5%) (22.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.25 1.46 0.691 3 24 9 4 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (7.5%) (60.0%) (22.5%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.40 1.71 0.984 2 21 10 5 1 1 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (5.0%) (52.5%) (25.0%) (12.5%) (2.5%) (2.5%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.26 1.50 0.762 2 25 7 6 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (5.0%) (62.5%) (17.5%) (15.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.09 1.18 0.457 2 32 5 1 0 0 (5.0%) (80.0%) (12.5%) (2.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.08 1.16 0.374 3 31 6 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (7.5%) (77.5%) (15.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.60 1.84 0.945 2 18 10 8 2 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (5.0%) (45.0%) (25.0%) (20.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.16 1.37 0.751 2 29 5 3 1 0 (5.0%) (72.5%) (12.5%) (7.5%) (2.5%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 40 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E CMS 102 G2514 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.40 1.79 1.044 2 21 7 8 1 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (5.0%) (52.5%) (17.5%) (20.0%) (2.5%) (2.5%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.77 1.92 0.941 2 16 11 9 2 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (5.0%) (40.0%) (27.5%) (22.5%) (5.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.10 2.18 1.087 2 13 10 11 3 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.0%) (32.5%) (25.0%) (27.5%) (7.5%) (2.5%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.15 3.30 0.618 3 0 1 26 8 2 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (7.5%) (0.0%) (2.5%) (65.0%) (20.0%) (5.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.05 2.19 1.050 3 12 11 9 5 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (7.5%) (30.0%) (27.5%) (22.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.36 1.53 0.725 2 22 13 2 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.0%) (55.0%) (32.5%) (5.0%) (2.5%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.92 2.81 0.710 4 3 4 26 3 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (10.0%) (7.5%) (10.0%) (65.0%) (7.5%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.23 2.38 1.037 3 7 15 11 2 2 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (7.5%) (17.5%) (37.5%) (27.5%) (5.0%) (5.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.50 1.74 0.828 2 19 10 9 0 0 (5.0%) (47.5%) (25.0%) (22.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 2.05 2.08 0.894 3 12 11 13 1 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (7.5%) (30.0%) (27.5%) (32.5%) (2.5%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.13 1.24 0.490 2 30 7 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (5.0%) (75.0%) (17.5%) (2.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.22 1.54 0.900 3 25 6 4 2 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (7.5%) (62.5%) (15.0%) (10.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.45 1.71 0.835 2 20 9 9 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.0%) (50.0%) (22.5%) (22.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 40 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E CMS 102 G2514 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 2.10 2.13 0.991 2 13 10 12 3 0 (5.0%) (32.5%) (25.0%) (30.0%) (7.5%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.73 1.84 0.855 2 16 13 8 1 0 (5.0%) (40.0%) (32.5%) (20.0%) (2.5%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.81 1.92 0.862 3 14 13 9 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (7.5%) (35.0%) (32.5%) (22.5%) (2.5%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

38. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 5 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)39. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 6 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)40. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 7 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 29 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E COM 130 P3666 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.38 1.69 1.004 0 16 9 2 1 1 (0.0%) (55.2%) (31.0%) (6.9%) (3.4%) (3.4%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.17 1.41 0.867 0 21 6 1 0 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (72.4%) (20.7%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (3.4%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.06 1.11 0.315 1 25 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.4%) (86.2%) (10.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.17 1.31 0.541 0 21 7 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (72.4%) (24.1%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.43 1.75 1.041 1 15 8 3 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.4%) (51.7%) (27.6%) (10.3%) (3.4%) (3.4%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.38 1.66 0.936 0 16 9 3 0 1 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (55.2%) (31.0%) (10.3%) (0.0%) (3.4%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.32 1.45 0.572 0 17 11 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (58.6%) (37.9%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.24 1.34 0.484 0 19 10 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (65.5%) (34.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.14 1.28 0.528 0 22 6 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (75.9%) (20.7%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.06 1.14 0.351 0 25 4 0 0 0 (0.0%) (86.2%) (13.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.06 1.17 0.468 0 25 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (86.2%) (10.3%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.06 1.21 0.559 0 25 2 2 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (86.2%) (6.9%) (6.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.08 1.14 0.356 1 24 4 0 0 0 (3.4%) (82.8%) (13.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 29 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E COM 130 P3666 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.61 1.93 1.132 0 13 9 5 0 2 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (44.8%) (31.0%) (17.2%) (0.0%) (6.9%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.38 1.66 0.974 0 16 10 1 1 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (55.2%) (34.5%) (3.4%) (3.4%) (3.4%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.80 2.04 1.138 1 11 10 3 3 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.4%) (37.9%) (34.5%) (10.3%) (10.3%) (3.4%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.04 3.10 0.409 0 0 1 24 4 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (3.4%) (82.8%) (13.8%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.79 2.07 1.163 0 12 7 8 0 2 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (41.4%) (24.1%) (27.6%) (0.0%) (6.9%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.86 1.97 0.865 0 9 14 4 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (31.0%) (48.3%) (13.8%) (6.9%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.76 2.54 0.744 1 4 5 19 0 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (3.4%) (13.8%) (17.2%) (65.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.68 2.66 1.078 0 5 7 11 5 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (17.2%) (24.1%) (37.9%) (17.2%) (3.4%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.59 1.90 1.145 0 13 11 2 1 2 (0.0%) (44.8%) (37.9%) (6.9%) (3.4%) (6.9%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.67 1.97 1.052 0 13 6 9 0 1 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (44.8%) (20.7%) (31.0%) (0.0%) (3.4%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.00 1.07 0.371 0 28 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (96.6%) (0.0%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.22 1.46 0.811 3 18 5 2 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (10.3%) (62.1%) (17.2%) (6.9%) (3.4%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.64 1.89 0.994 1 13 7 6 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.4%) (44.8%) (24.1%) (20.7%) (6.9%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 29 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E COM 130 P3666 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 2.10 2.29 1.301 1 11 5 7 3 2 (3.4%) (37.9%) (17.2%) (24.1%) (10.3%) (6.9%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.32 1.50 0.694 1 17 8 3 0 0 (3.4%) (58.6%) (27.6%) (10.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.79 1.96 0.999 1 12 7 7 2 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (3.4%) (41.4%) (24.1%) (24.1%) (6.9%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (3.4%) (93.1%) (0.0%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.32 1.79 1.146 0 17 5 4 2 1 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (58.6%) (17.2%) (13.8%) (6.9%) (3.4%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.28 1.69 1.072 0 18 6 1 4 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (62.1%) (20.7%) (3.4%) (13.8%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 29 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E COM 272 P3060 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.67 2.07 1.193 0 13 6 6 3 1 (0.0%) (44.8%) (20.7%) (20.7%) (10.3%) (3.4%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.43 1.86 1.156 0 15 8 2 3 1 (0.0%) (51.7%) (27.6%) (6.9%) (10.3%) (3.4%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.43 2.00 1.336 0 15 6 4 1 3 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (51.7%) (20.7%) (13.8%) (3.4%) (10.3%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 1.50 3.00 2.828 27 1 0 0 0 1 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (93.1%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (3.4%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 1.00 N/A 28 1 0 0 0 0 (96.6%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 1.00 N/A 28 1 0 0 0 0 (96.6%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A 1.00 N/A 28 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (96.6%) (3.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 29 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (90.5%) (9.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.41 1.55 0.686 1 11 7 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (4.8%) (52.4%) (33.3%) (9.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.41 1.62 0.740 0 11 7 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (52.4%) (33.3%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 21 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E COM 330 P3250 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 2.50 2.60 1.429 1 7 3 2 7 1 (4.8%) (33.3%) (14.3%) (9.5%) (33.3%) (4.8%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.79 2.00 1.000 0 8 7 4 2 0 (0.0%) (38.1%) (33.3%) (19.0%) (9.5%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.90 2.05 1.050 1 8 5 5 2 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (4.8%) (38.1%) (23.8%) (23.8%) (9.5%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 21 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 21 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 21 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 21 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 21 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 21 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 21 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 21 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 119 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.20 1.40 0.741 1 84 25 6 2 1 (0.8%) (70.6%) (21.0%) (5.0%) (1.7%) (0.8%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.23 1.41 0.707 1 81 29 6 1 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.8%) (68.1%) (24.4%) (5.0%) (0.8%) (0.8%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.07 1.15 0.422 3 101 14 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.5%) (84.9%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.8%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.25 1.42 0.685 2 77 34 4 1 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (1.7%) (64.7%) (28.6%) (3.4%) (0.8%) (0.8%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.42 1.60 0.790 3 63 40 10 2 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.5%) (52.9%) (33.6%) (8.4%) (1.7%) (0.8%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.34 1.56 0.790 1 70 33 13 1 1 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.8%) (58.8%) (27.7%) (10.9%) (0.8%) (0.8%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.17 1.30 0.547 3 86 25 5 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (2.5%) (72.3%) (21.0%) (4.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.23 1.43 0.735 2 79 30 5 2 1 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (1.7%) (66.4%) (25.2%) (4.2%) (1.7%) (0.8%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.13 1.27 0.565 3 92 17 7 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (2.5%) (77.3%) (14.3%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.06 1.11 0.343 3 104 11 1 0 0 (2.5%) (87.4%) (9.2%) (0.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.05 1.10 0.333 3 105 10 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (2.5%) (88.2%) (8.4%) (0.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.26 1.49 0.750 2 76 27 12 2 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (1.7%) (63.9%) (22.7%) (10.1%) (1.7%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.14 1.26 0.549 5 89 21 3 1 0 (4.2%) (74.8%) (17.6%) (2.5%) (0.8%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 119 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.27 1.56 0.913 2 75 25 13 1 3 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (1.7%) (63.0%) (21.0%) (10.9%) (0.8%) (2.5%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.27 1.53 0.836 2 75 27 11 3 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (1.7%) (63.0%) (22.7%) (9.2%) (2.5%) (0.8%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.63 1.83 0.963 3 53 40 15 6 2 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.5%) (44.5%) (33.6%) (12.6%) (5.0%) (1.7%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.12 3.22 0.529 3 0 2 90 20 4 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (2.5%) (0.0%) (1.7%) (75.6%) (16.8%) (3.4%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.78 1.93 0.967 3 47 39 23 5 2 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (2.5%) (39.5%) (32.8%) (19.3%) (4.2%) (1.7%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.48 1.62 0.742 3 59 45 9 3 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.5%) (49.6%) (37.8%) (7.6%) (2.5%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.96 2.90 0.812 6 10 9 80 10 4 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (5.0%) (8.4%) (7.6%) (67.2%) (8.4%) (3.4%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.26 2.31 0.968 4 25 42 38 7 3 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.4%) (21.0%) (35.3%) (31.9%) (5.9%) (2.5%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.42 1.63 0.840 3 63 38 12 1 2 (2.5%) (52.9%) (31.9%) (10.1%) (0.8%) (1.7%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.81 1.97 0.977 3 49 29 32 5 1 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (2.5%) (41.2%) (24.4%) (26.9%) (4.2%) (0.8%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.06 1.13 0.407 3 104 9 3 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (2.5%) (87.4%) (7.6%) (2.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.29 1.59 0.916 7 71 23 12 5 1 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (5.9%) (59.7%) (19.3%) (10.1%) (4.2%) (0.8%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.44 1.73 0.917 3 62 29 19 6 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.5%) (52.1%) (24.4%) (16.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 119 STUDENTS RESPONDED ANDERSON E ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 2.04 2.23 1.202 4 44 24 27 16 4 (3.4%) (37.0%) (20.2%) (22.7%) (13.4%) (3.4%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.56 1.79 0.937 3 56 36 17 6 1 (2.5%) (47.1%) (30.3%) (14.3%) (5.0%) (0.8%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.76 1.97 1.051 5 49 31 25 6 3 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (4.2%) (41.2%) (26.1%) (21.0%) (5.0%) (2.5%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 1.50 3.00 2.828 117 1 0 0 0 1 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (98.3%) (0.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.8%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 1.00 N/A 118 1 0 0 0 0 (99.2%) (0.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 1.00 N/A 118 1 0 0 0 0 (99.2%) (0.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A 1.00 N/A 118 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (99.2%) (0.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 119 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 119 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 119 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 119 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 10 STUDENTS RESPONDED EBBEN M COM 299 G3401 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.13 1.20 0.422 0 8 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (80.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.13 1.20 0.422 0 8 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (80.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.06 1.10 0.316 0 9 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (90.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.21 1.30 0.483 0 7 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (70.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.30 1.38 0.518 2 5 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (20.0%) (50.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.21 1.30 0.483 0 7 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (70.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.21 1.40 0.699 0 7 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (70.0%) (20.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.13 1.30 0.675 0 8 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (80.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.06 1.10 0.316 0 9 1 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (90.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.33 1.40 0.516 0 6 4 0 0 0 (0.0%) (60.0%) (40.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.13 1.20 0.422 0 8 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (80.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.13 1.20 0.422 0 8 2 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (80.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.06 1.10 0.316 0 9 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (90.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 10 STUDENTS RESPONDED EBBEN M COM 299 G3401 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.30 1.56 0.726 1 5 3 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (10.0%) (50.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.33 1.40 0.516 0 6 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (60.0%) (40.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.17 1.44 0.726 1 6 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (10.0%) (60.0%) (20.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.94 3.00 0.000 1 0 0 9 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (90.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.00 2.00 0.816 0 3 4 3 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (30.0%) (40.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.30 1.44 0.527 1 5 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (10.0%) (50.0%) (40.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.00 3.11 0.601 1 0 1 6 2 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (10.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%) (60.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.00 2.11 0.782 1 2 4 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (10.0%) (20.0%) (40.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.13 1.20 0.422 0 8 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (80.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.13 1.20 0.422 0 8 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (80.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.06 1.20 0.632 0 9 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (90.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.13 1.30 0.675 0 8 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (80.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.33 1.60 0.843 0 6 2 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (60.0%) (20.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 10 STUDENTS RESPONDED EBBEN M COM 299 G3401 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.21 1.30 0.483 0 7 3 0 0 0 (0.0%) (70.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.13 1.20 0.422 0 8 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (80.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.13 1.20 0.422 0 8 2 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (80.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 20 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D MES 225 P3949 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.50 1.60 0.754 0 10 9 0 1 0 (0.0%) (50.0%) (45.0%) (0.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.41 1.65 0.875 0 11 6 2 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (55.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.09 1.25 0.716 0 17 2 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (85.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.61 1.65 0.671 0 9 9 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (45.0%) (45.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.40 1.53 0.612 1 10 8 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.0%) (50.0%) (40.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.72 1.75 0.716 0 8 9 3 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (40.0%) (45.0%) (15.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.50 1.65 0.745 0 10 7 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (50.0%) (35.0%) (15.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.50 1.78 0.878 2 9 4 5 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (10.0%) (45.0%) (20.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.41 1.70 1.081 0 11 7 0 1 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (55.0%) (35.0%) (0.0%) (5.0%) (5.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.06 1.10 0.308 0 18 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (90.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.21 1.45 0.826 0 14 4 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (70.0%) (20.0%) (5.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.68 1.65 0.587 0 8 11 1 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (40.0%) (55.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.41 1.75 1.070 0 11 5 3 0 1 (0.0%) (55.0%) (25.0%) (15.0%) (0.0%) (5.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 20 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D MES 225 P3949 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.50 1.95 1.191 0 10 4 4 1 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (50.0%) (20.0%) (20.0%) (5.0%) (5.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.17 1.35 0.671 0 15 3 2 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (75.0%) (15.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.80 1.90 0.968 0 7 10 2 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (35.0%) (50.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (5.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.70 2.60 0.821 0 2 6 10 2 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (10.0%) (30.0%) (50.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.88 2.75 1.055 8 2 1 8 0 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (40.0%) (10.0%) (5.0%) (40.0%) (0.0%) (5.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.40 1.53 0.612 1 10 8 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.0%) (50.0%) (40.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.50 2.35 0.745 0 3 7 10 0 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (15.0%) (35.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.86 2.80 0.951 0 2 4 11 2 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (10.0%) (20.0%) (55.0%) (10.0%) (5.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.50 1.70 0.923 0 10 8 0 2 0 (0.0%) (50.0%) (40.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.70 1.87 0.834 5 6 5 4 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (25.0%) (30.0%) (25.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.20 1.43 0.756 6 10 2 2 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (30.0%) (50.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.70 1.86 0.949 6 6 5 2 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (30.0%) (30.0%) (25.0%) (10.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 2.50 2.33 1.113 5 5 2 6 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (25.0%) (25.0%) (10.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 20 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D MES 225 P3949 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.50 1.86 1.027 6 7 3 3 1 0 (30.0%) (35.0%) (15.0%) (15.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.50 1.80 0.941 5 7 5 2 1 0 (25.0%) (35.0%) (25.0%) (10.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.50 2.07 1.280 5 7 3 3 1 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (25.0%) (35.0%) (15.0%) (15.0%) (5.0%) (5.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 20 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 20 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 20 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 20 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 20 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 20 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 20 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 20 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 34 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D MES 284 P3317 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.21 1.44 0.786 0 24 6 3 1 0 (0.0%) (70.6%) (17.6%) (8.8%) (2.9%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.27 1.56 0.860 0 22 6 5 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (64.7%) (17.6%) (14.7%) (2.9%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.11 1.24 0.554 0 28 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (82.4%) (11.8%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.58 1.76 0.902 1 15 13 4 0 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (2.9%) (44.1%) (38.2%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (2.9%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.18 1.38 0.739 0 25 6 2 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (73.5%) (17.6%) (5.9%) (2.9%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.39 1.56 0.746 0 19 12 2 1 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (55.9%) (35.3%) (5.9%) (2.9%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.39 1.62 0.853 0 19 11 2 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (55.9%) (32.4%) (5.9%) (5.9%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.20 1.42 0.708 1 23 6 4 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (2.9%) (67.6%) (17.6%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.17 1.36 0.653 1 24 6 3 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (2.9%) (70.6%) (17.6%) (8.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.13 1.26 0.567 0 27 5 2 0 0 (0.0%) (79.4%) (14.7%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.23 1.42 0.663 1 22 8 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (2.9%) (64.7%) (23.5%) (8.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.65 1.74 0.751 0 15 13 6 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (44.1%) (38.2%) (17.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.39 1.56 0.705 0 19 11 4 0 0 (0.0%) (55.9%) (32.4%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 34 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D MES 284 P3317 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.50 1.79 0.978 0 17 9 7 0 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (50.0%) (26.5%) (20.6%) (0.0%) (2.9%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.24 1.38 0.604 0 23 9 2 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (67.6%) (26.5%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.04 2.18 1.014 1 9 13 8 2 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.9%) (26.5%) (38.2%) (23.5%) (5.9%) (2.9%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.06 3.09 0.452 0 0 2 27 5 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (5.9%) (79.4%) (14.7%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.30 2.26 1.214 0 13 5 12 2 2 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (38.2%) (14.7%) (35.3%) (5.9%) (5.9%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.71 1.85 0.958 0 14 14 4 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (41.2%) (41.2%) (11.8%) (2.9%) (2.9%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.93 2.88 0.686 0 1 7 21 5 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (2.9%) (20.6%) (61.8%) (14.7%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.58 2.59 0.857 0 3 13 13 5 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (8.8%) (38.2%) (38.2%) (14.7%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.35 1.65 0.917 0 20 8 4 2 0 (0.0%) (58.8%) (23.5%) (11.8%) (5.9%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.38 1.57 0.742 6 16 8 4 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (17.6%) (47.1%) (23.5%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.06 1.18 0.548 6 25 1 2 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (17.6%) (73.5%) (2.9%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.38 1.82 1.124 6 16 4 6 1 1 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (17.6%) (47.1%) (11.8%) (17.6%) (2.9%) (2.9%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.50 1.89 1.100 6 14 6 6 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (17.6%) (41.2%) (17.6%) (17.6%) (2.9%) (2.9%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 34 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D MES 284 P3317 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.28 1.61 0.916 6 18 4 5 1 0 (17.6%) (52.9%) (11.8%) (14.7%) (2.9%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.28 1.54 0.793 6 18 5 5 0 0 (17.6%) (52.9%) (14.7%) (14.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.83 2.00 1.054 6 12 6 9 0 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (17.6%) (35.3%) (17.6%) (26.5%) (0.0%) (2.9%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 34 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 34 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 34 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 34 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 34 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 34 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 34 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 34 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 54 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.29 1.50 0.771 0 34 15 3 2 0 (0.0%) (63.0%) (27.8%) (5.6%) (3.7%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.32 1.59 0.858 0 33 12 7 2 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (61.1%) (22.2%) (13.0%) (3.7%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.10 1.24 0.612 0 45 6 2 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (83.3%) (11.1%) (3.7%) (1.9%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.59 1.72 0.818 1 24 22 6 0 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (1.9%) (44.4%) (40.7%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (1.9%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.24 1.43 0.694 1 35 14 3 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (64.8%) (25.9%) (5.6%) (1.9%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.50 1.63 0.734 0 27 21 5 1 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (50.0%) (38.9%) (9.3%) (1.9%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.43 1.63 0.808 0 29 18 5 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (53.7%) (33.3%) (9.3%) (3.7%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.28 1.55 0.783 3 32 10 9 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (5.6%) (59.3%) (18.5%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.24 1.49 0.846 1 35 13 3 1 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (1.9%) (64.8%) (24.1%) (5.6%) (1.9%) (1.9%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.10 1.20 0.491 0 45 7 2 0 0 (0.0%) (83.3%) (13.0%) (3.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.22 1.43 0.721 1 36 12 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (1.9%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (7.4%) (1.9%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.67 1.70 0.690 0 23 24 7 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (42.6%) (44.4%) (13.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.40 1.63 0.853 0 30 16 7 0 1 (0.0%) (55.6%) (29.6%) (13.0%) (0.0%) (1.9%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 54 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.50 1.85 1.053 0 27 13 11 1 2 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (50.0%) (24.1%) (20.4%) (1.9%) (3.7%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.21 1.37 0.623 0 38 12 4 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (70.4%) (22.2%) (7.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.93 2.08 0.997 1 16 23 10 2 2 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (29.6%) (42.6%) (18.5%) (3.7%) (3.7%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.96 2.91 0.652 0 2 8 37 7 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (3.7%) (14.8%) (68.5%) (13.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.60 2.39 1.183 8 15 6 20 2 3 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (14.8%) (27.8%) (11.1%) (37.0%) (3.7%) (5.6%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.59 1.74 0.858 1 24 22 5 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (44.4%) (40.7%) (9.3%) (1.9%) (1.9%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.79 2.69 0.748 0 4 14 31 5 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (7.4%) (25.9%) (57.4%) (9.3%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.71 2.67 0.890 0 5 17 24 7 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (9.3%) (31.5%) (44.4%) (13.0%) (1.9%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.40 1.67 0.911 0 30 16 4 4 0 (0.0%) (55.6%) (29.6%) (7.4%) (7.4%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.45 1.67 0.778 11 22 13 8 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (20.4%) (40.7%) (24.1%) (14.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.10 1.26 0.627 12 35 3 4 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (22.2%) (64.8%) (5.6%) (7.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.45 1.83 1.057 12 22 9 8 2 1 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (22.2%) (40.7%) (16.7%) (14.8%) (3.7%) (1.9%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.75 2.05 1.112 11 19 8 12 3 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (20.4%) (35.2%) (14.8%) (22.2%) (5.6%) (1.9%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 54 STUDENTS RESPONDED CHAIMOWITZ D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.34 1.69 0.950 12 25 7 8 2 0 (22.2%) (46.3%) (13.0%) (14.8%) (3.7%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.34 1.63 0.846 11 25 10 7 1 0 (20.4%) (46.3%) (18.5%) (13.0%) (1.9%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.72 2.02 1.123 11 19 9 12 1 2 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (20.4%) (35.2%) (16.7%) (22.2%) (1.9%) (3.7%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 54 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 54 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 54 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 54 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 54 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 54 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 54 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 54 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 10 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 150 G2486 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 2.00 2.40 1.506 0 4 2 1 2 1 (0.0%) (40.0%) (20.0%) (10.0%) (20.0%) (10.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 2.83 2.70 1.160 0 2 2 3 3 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (20.0%) (20.0%) (30.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.33 1.50 0.707 0 6 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (60.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.90 2.10 1.101 0 3 5 0 2 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (30.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.33 1.50 0.707 0 6 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (60.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 2.50 2.30 1.059 0 3 2 4 1 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (30.0%) (20.0%) (40.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 2.17 2.20 1.033 0 3 3 3 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (30.0%) (30.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.21 1.50 0.850 0 7 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (70.0%) (10.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.07 1.33 0.707 1 7 1 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (10.0%) (70.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.33 1.40 0.516 0 6 4 0 0 0 (0.0%) (60.0%) (40.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.33 1.40 0.516 0 6 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (60.0%) (40.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 2.50 2.40 0.966 0 2 3 4 1 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (20.0%) (30.0%) (40.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.30 1.67 1.000 1 5 3 0 1 0 (10.0%) (50.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 10 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 150 G2486 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.33 1.70 0.949 0 6 1 3 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (60.0%) (10.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.83 2.00 1.054 0 4 3 2 1 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (40.0%) (30.0%) (20.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.75 1.90 0.994 0 4 4 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (40.0%) (40.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.17 3.20 0.632 0 0 1 6 3 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%) (60.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.50 1.90 1.287 0 5 3 1 0 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (50.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.33 1.60 0.966 0 6 3 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (60.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 4.10 4.10 0.738 0 0 0 2 5 3 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (20.0%) (50.0%) (30.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.50 1.90 1.287 0 5 3 1 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.83 1.80 0.632 0 3 6 1 0 0 (0.0%) (30.0%) (60.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 2.83 2.67 1.323 1 3 0 3 3 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (10.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (30.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.50 2.00 1.000 3 3 1 3 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (30.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 2.50 2.67 1.323 1 2 2 3 1 1 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (10.0%) (20.0%) (20.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.50 2.25 1.581 2 4 1 1 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (20.0%) (40.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%) (10.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 10 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 150 G2486 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.83 2.00 1.095 4 2 3 0 1 0 (40.0%) (20.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.50 2.00 1.323 1 4 3 1 0 1 (10.0%) (40.0%) (30.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%) (10.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 2.00 2.14 0.900 3 2 2 3 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (30.0%) (20.0%) (20.0%) (30.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 10 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 14 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 150 G2490 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 2.00 2.00 0.961 0 6 2 6 0 0 (0.0%) (42.9%) (14.3%) (42.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 2.70 2.71 1.139 0 2 4 5 2 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (14.3%) (28.6%) (35.7%) (14.3%) (7.1%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 2.79 2.43 1.158 0 5 0 7 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (35.7%) (0.0%) (50.0%) (14.3%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 2.90 2.71 1.139 0 3 2 5 4 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (21.4%) (14.3%) (35.7%) (28.6%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.38 1.64 0.842 0 8 3 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (57.1%) (21.4%) (21.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 2.70 2.57 1.284 0 4 2 5 2 1 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (28.6%) (14.3%) (35.7%) (14.3%) (7.1%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 2.79 2.62 1.044 1 3 1 7 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (7.1%) (21.4%) (7.1%) (50.0%) (14.3%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 2.50 2.36 1.277 0 5 2 5 1 1 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (35.7%) (14.3%) (35.7%) (7.1%) (7.1%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 2.50 2.21 1.051 0 5 2 6 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (35.7%) (14.3%) (42.9%) (7.1%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 2.50 2.21 1.251 0 6 1 6 0 1 (0.0%) (42.9%) (7.1%) (42.9%) (0.0%) (7.1%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 2.63 2.14 1.027 0 6 0 8 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (42.9%) (0.0%) (57.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 2.67 2.57 0.938 0 2 4 6 2 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (14.3%) (28.6%) (42.9%) (14.3%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 2.64 2.50 0.855 0 2 4 7 1 0 (0.0%) (14.3%) (28.6%) (50.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 14 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 150 G2490 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 2.83 2.64 0.842 0 2 2 9 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (14.3%) (14.3%) (64.3%) (7.1%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 2.70 2.57 1.089 0 3 3 5 3 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (21.4%) (21.4%) (35.7%) (21.4%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.79 2.71 1.069 0 2 3 7 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (14.3%) (21.4%) (50.0%) (7.1%) (7.1%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.14 3.29 0.611 0 0 0 11 2 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (78.6%) (14.3%) (7.1%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.10 2.23 0.927 1 3 5 4 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (7.1%) (21.4%) (35.7%) (28.6%) (7.1%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 2.50 2.29 0.994 0 4 3 6 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (28.6%) (21.4%) (42.9%) (7.1%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 4.00 4.00 0.961 0 0 0 6 2 6 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (42.9%) (14.3%) (42.9%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.17 2.14 1.027 0 5 3 5 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (35.7%) (21.4%) (35.7%) (7.1%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 2.67 2.64 1.082 0 2 4 6 1 1 (0.0%) (14.3%) (28.6%) (42.9%) (7.1%) (7.1%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 2.90 3.11 1.269 5 1 1 5 0 2 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (35.7%) (7.1%) (7.1%) (35.7%) (0.0%) (14.3%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 2.70 2.38 0.916 6 2 1 5 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (42.9%) (14.3%) (7.1%) (35.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 2.83 2.78 0.833 5 1 1 6 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (35.7%) (7.1%) (7.1%) (42.9%) (7.1%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 2.50 2.33 0.866 5 2 2 5 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (35.7%) (14.3%) (14.3%) (35.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 14 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 150 G2490 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 3.10 3.00 0.926 6 1 0 5 2 0 (42.9%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (35.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 2.75 2.78 0.972 5 1 2 4 2 0 (35.7%) (7.1%) (14.3%) (28.6%) (14.3%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 2.90 2.75 0.886 6 1 1 5 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (42.9%) (7.1%) (7.1%) (35.7%) (7.1%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 16 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 200 P3154 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.50 1.69 0.873 0 8 6 1 1 0 (0.0%) (50.0%) (37.5%) (6.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 2.50 2.38 1.204 0 5 3 6 1 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (31.3%) (18.8%) (37.5%) (6.3%) (6.3%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.30 1.44 0.629 0 10 5 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (62.5%) (31.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 2.10 2.19 1.047 0 5 5 4 2 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (31.3%) (31.3%) (25.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.17 1.31 0.602 0 12 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (75.0%) (18.8%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.83 2.19 1.328 0 7 3 3 2 1 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (43.8%) (18.8%) (18.8%) (12.5%) (6.3%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 2.13 2.25 0.931 0 3 8 3 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (18.8%) (50.0%) (18.8%) (12.5%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.23 1.44 0.727 0 11 3 2 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (68.8%) (18.8%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.07 1.31 0.873 0 14 0 1 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (87.5%) (0.0%) (6.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.39 1.81 1.167 0 9 3 3 0 1 (0.0%) (56.3%) (18.8%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (6.3%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.07 1.25 0.683 0 14 0 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (87.5%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.90 2.00 0.966 0 6 5 4 1 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (37.5%) (31.3%) (25.0%) (6.3%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.50 1.69 0.793 0 8 5 3 0 0 (0.0%) (50.0%) (31.3%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 16 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 200 P3154 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.88 1.88 0.719 0 5 8 3 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (31.3%) (50.0%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.64 1.69 0.704 0 7 7 2 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (43.8%) (43.8%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.72 1.75 0.775 0 6 9 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (37.5%) (56.3%) (0.0%) (6.3%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.14 3.25 0.683 0 0 1 11 3 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (6.3%) (68.8%) (18.8%) (6.3%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.30 1.44 0.629 0 10 5 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (62.5%) (31.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.39 1.69 1.078 0 9 5 1 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (56.3%) (31.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (6.3%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.75 3.75 0.683 0 0 0 6 8 2 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (37.5%) (50.0%) (12.5%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.50 1.56 0.629 0 8 7 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (43.8%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.94 1.94 0.680 0 4 9 3 0 0 (0.0%) (25.0%) (56.3%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.75 1.91 0.831 5 4 4 3 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (31.3%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.50 1.88 0.991 8 4 1 3 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (50.0%) (25.0%) (6.3%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 2.50 2.45 1.293 5 4 1 3 3 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (31.3%) (25.0%) (6.3%) (18.8%) (18.8%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.17 1.44 0.726 7 6 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (43.8%) (37.5%) (12.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 16 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D MES 200 P3154 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.25 1.71 0.951 9 4 1 2 0 0 (56.3%) (25.0%) (6.3%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 2.00 2.10 0.994 6 3 4 2 1 0 (37.5%) (18.8%) (25.0%) (12.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.83 2.00 0.866 7 3 3 3 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (43.8%) (18.8%) (18.8%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 40 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.70 1.97 1.097 0 18 10 8 3 1 (0.0%) (45.0%) (25.0%) (20.0%) (7.5%) (2.5%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 2.64 2.57 1.152 0 9 9 14 6 2 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (22.5%) (22.5%) (35.0%) (15.0%) (5.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.45 1.80 0.966 0 21 8 9 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (52.5%) (20.0%) (22.5%) (5.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 2.25 2.35 1.099 0 11 12 9 8 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (27.5%) (30.0%) (22.5%) (20.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.27 1.47 0.716 0 26 9 5 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (65.0%) (22.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 2.36 2.35 1.231 0 14 7 12 5 2 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (35.0%) (17.5%) (30.0%) (12.5%) (5.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 2.33 2.36 0.986 1 9 12 13 5 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (2.5%) (22.5%) (30.0%) (32.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.37 1.77 1.050 0 23 6 9 1 1 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (57.5%) (15.0%) (22.5%) (2.5%) (2.5%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.23 1.64 0.986 1 26 3 8 2 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (2.5%) (65.0%) (7.5%) (20.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.45 1.85 1.099 0 21 8 9 0 2 (0.0%) (52.5%) (20.0%) (22.5%) (0.0%) (5.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.27 1.60 0.871 0 26 4 10 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (65.0%) (10.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 2.33 2.30 0.966 0 10 12 14 4 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (25.0%) (30.0%) (35.0%) (10.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.83 1.97 0.932 1 15 12 10 2 0 (2.5%) (37.5%) (30.0%) (25.0%) (5.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 40 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 2.14 2.10 0.900 0 13 11 15 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (32.5%) (27.5%) (37.5%) (2.5%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.96 2.07 0.997 0 14 13 9 4 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (35.0%) (32.5%) (22.5%) (10.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.00 2.13 1.017 0 12 16 8 3 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (30.0%) (40.0%) (20.0%) (7.5%) (2.5%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.14 3.25 0.630 0 0 2 28 8 2 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (5.0%) (70.0%) (20.0%) (5.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.58 1.82 0.970 1 18 13 6 1 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (2.5%) (45.0%) (32.5%) (15.0%) (2.5%) (2.5%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.59 1.88 1.042 0 19 11 7 2 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (47.5%) (27.5%) (17.5%) (5.0%) (2.5%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.90 3.92 0.797 0 0 0 14 15 11 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (35.0%) (37.5%) (27.5%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.65 1.85 0.975 0 18 13 7 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (45.0%) (32.5%) (17.5%) (2.5%) (2.5%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 2.08 2.15 0.893 0 9 19 10 1 1 (0.0%) (22.5%) (47.5%) (25.0%) (2.5%) (2.5%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 2.59 2.52 1.214 11 8 5 11 3 2 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (27.5%) (20.0%) (12.5%) (27.5%) (7.5%) (5.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 2.17 2.09 0.949 17 9 3 11 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (42.5%) (22.5%) (7.5%) (27.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 2.75 2.62 1.147 11 7 4 12 5 1 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (27.5%) (17.5%) (10.0%) (30.0%) (12.5%) (2.5%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.70 2.00 1.131 14 12 5 7 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (35.0%) (30.0%) (12.5%) (17.5%) (2.5%) (2.5%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 40 STUDENTS RESPONDED GILBERT D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 2.25 2.29 1.102 19 7 4 7 3 0 (47.5%) (17.5%) (10.0%) (17.5%) (7.5%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 2.17 2.29 1.117 12 8 9 7 3 1 (30.0%) (20.0%) (22.5%) (17.5%) (7.5%) (2.5%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 2.50 2.29 0.908 16 6 6 11 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (40.0%) (15.0%) (15.0%) (27.5%) (2.5%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 40 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 6 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N MES 341 P3395 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 0.90 1.00 0.000 1 5 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.10 1.17 0.408 0 5 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 6 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N MES 341 P3395 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.10 1.17 0.408 0 5 1 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.10 1.17 0.408 0 5 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.10 1.17 0.408 0 5 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.00 3.00 0.000 0 0 0 6 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.90 2.67 0.816 0 1 0 5 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.90 2.83 0.408 0 0 1 5 0 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.25 1.50 0.837 0 4 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (16.7%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.10 1.17 0.408 0 5 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.00 1.67 1.155 3 2 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (50.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.00 1.67 1.155 3 2 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (50.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 0.83 1.00 0.000 3 3 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.00 1.67 1.155 3 2 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (50.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 6 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N MES 341 P3395 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.00 1.67 1.155 3 2 0 1 0 0 (50.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.00 1.67 1.155 3 2 0 1 0 0 (50.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.00 1.67 1.155 3 2 0 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (50.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 4 2 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 4 2 0 0 0 0 (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 4 2 0 0 0 0 (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 4 2 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (16.7%) (66.7%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 0.90 1.00 0.000 1 5 0 0 0 0 (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 6 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N MES 341 P3473 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 0.90 1.00 0.000 1 5 0 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 0.90 1.00 0.000 1 5 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 0.90 1.00 0.000 1 5 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.00 3.20 0.447 1 0 0 4 1 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (66.7%) (16.7%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.00 1.67 1.155 3 2 0 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (50.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 0.90 1.00 0.000 1 5 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.50 2.60 0.548 1 0 2 3 0 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (16.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.75 1.80 0.447 1 1 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (16.7%) (16.7%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 0.90 1.00 0.000 1 5 0 0 0 0 (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? N/A 1.00 N/A 5 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? N/A 1.00 N/A 5 1 0 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? N/A 1.00 N/A 5 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? N/A 1.00 N/A 5 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 6 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N MES 341 P3473 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) N/A 1.00 N/A 5 1 0 0 0 0 (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) N/A 1.00 N/A 5 1 0 0 0 0 (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? N/A 1.00 N/A 5 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 0.83 1.00 0.000 3 3 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 0.83 1.00 0.000 3 3 0 0 0 0 (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 0.83 1.00 0.000 3 3 0 0 0 0 (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? 0.83 1.00 0.000 3 3 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (16.7%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 6 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N MES 341 P3454 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 6 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.10 3.17 0.408 0 0 0 5 1 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.00 2.33 0.577 3 0 2 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (50.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.10 1.50 1.225 0 5 0 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.75 3.67 0.516 0 0 0 2 4 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (66.7%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.50 2.33 0.816 0 1 2 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (16.7%) (33.3%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.10 1.17 0.408 0 5 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 2.00 2.00 0.000 4 0 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.50 1.50 0.707 4 1 1 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (66.7%) (16.7%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.50 2.50 2.121 4 1 0 0 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (66.7%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? N/A 3.00 N/A 5 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 6 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N MES 341 P3454 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) N/A 3.00 N/A 5 0 0 1 0 0 (83.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) N/A 2.00 N/A 5 0 1 0 0 0 (83.3%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? N/A 1.00 N/A 5 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 2 4 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (33.3%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 2 4 0 0 0 0 (33.3%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 2 4 0 0 0 0 (33.3%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 2 4 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (33.3%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 0.97 1.00 0.000 1 17 0 0 0 0 (5.6%) (94.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.03 1.06 0.250 2 15 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (11.1%) (83.3%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.00 1.00 0.000 2 16 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (11.1%) (88.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.00 1.06 0.243 1 16 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (5.6%) (88.9%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.17 1.47 1.007 1 12 4 0 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.6%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (5.6%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.03 1.12 0.332 1 15 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (5.6%) (83.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.00 1.06 0.243 1 16 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (5.6%) (88.9%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 0.97 1.00 0.000 1 17 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (5.6%) (94.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 0.97 1.00 0.000 1 17 0 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (5.6%) (94.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.00 1.06 0.243 1 16 1 0 0 0 (5.6%) (88.9%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 0.97 1.00 0.000 1 17 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (5.6%) (94.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.03 1.06 0.250 2 15 1 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (11.1%) (83.3%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 0.97 1.00 0.000 1 17 0 0 0 0 (5.6%) (94.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.00 1.06 0.243 1 16 1 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (5.6%) (88.9%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.00 1.06 0.243 1 16 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (5.6%) (88.9%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.00 1.06 0.243 1 16 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.6%) (88.9%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.03 3.12 0.332 1 0 0 15 2 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (83.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.64 2.33 0.888 6 3 2 7 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (33.3%) (16.7%) (11.1%) (38.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.00 1.18 0.728 1 16 0 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.6%) (88.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.00 3.06 0.659 1 0 3 10 4 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (5.6%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (55.6%) (22.2%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.79 1.88 0.781 1 6 7 4 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.6%) (33.3%) (38.9%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.03 1.12 0.332 1 15 2 0 0 0 (5.6%) (83.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.50 1.67 0.816 12 3 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (66.7%) (16.7%) (11.1%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.25 1.50 0.837 12 4 1 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (66.7%) (22.2%) (5.6%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.10 1.50 1.225 12 5 0 0 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (66.7%) (27.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.17 1.80 1.095 13 3 0 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (72.2%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED IVES N ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.17 1.80 1.095 13 3 0 2 0 0 (72.2%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.17 1.60 0.894 13 3 1 1 0 0 (72.2%) (16.7%) (5.6%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.00 1.40 0.894 13 4 0 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (72.2%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 0.94 1.00 0.000 9 9 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 0.94 1.00 0.000 9 9 0 0 0 0 (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 0.94 1.00 0.000 9 9 0 0 0 0 (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? 0.94 1.00 0.000 9 9 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 14 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K MES 320 P3472 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.20 1.50 1.092 0 10 3 0 0 1 (0.0%) (71.4%) (21.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (7.1%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.70 1.93 1.141 0 6 5 2 0 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (42.9%) (35.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (7.1%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 14 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.38 1.57 0.756 0 8 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (57.1%) (28.6%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.14 1.29 0.611 0 11 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (78.6%) (14.3%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.20 1.36 0.633 0 10 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (71.4%) (21.4%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.14 1.36 0.745 0 11 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (78.6%) (7.1%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.08 1.29 0.825 0 12 1 0 1 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (85.7%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.04 1.14 0.535 0 13 0 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (92.9%) (0.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.04 1.07 0.267 0 13 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (92.9%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 14 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.25 1.38 0.506 1 8 5 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (7.1%) (57.1%) (35.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.08 1.14 0.363 0 12 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 14 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K MES 320 P3472 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.28 1.50 0.760 0 9 3 2 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (64.3%) (21.4%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.38 1.64 0.842 0 8 3 3 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (57.1%) (21.4%) (21.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.90 2.00 0.961 0 5 5 3 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (35.7%) (35.7%) (21.4%) (7.1%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.08 3.14 0.363 0 0 0 12 2 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.50 2.11 1.054 5 4 0 5 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (35.7%) (28.6%) (0.0%) (35.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.38 1.64 0.929 0 8 4 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (57.1%) (28.6%) (7.1%) (7.1%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.14 3.21 0.426 0 0 0 11 3 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (78.6%) (21.4%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.00 2.07 0.997 0 5 4 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (35.7%) (28.6%) (28.6%) (7.1%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.38 1.57 0.756 0 8 4 2 0 0 (0.0%) (57.1%) (28.6%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.25 1.33 0.492 2 8 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (14.3%) (57.1%) (28.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.06 1.27 0.647 3 9 1 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (21.4%) (64.3%) (7.1%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.25 1.50 0.905 2 8 3 0 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (14.3%) (57.1%) (21.4%) (0.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.50 1.82 0.874 3 5 3 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (21.4%) (35.7%) (21.4%) (21.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 14 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K MES 320 P3472 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.50 1.64 0.674 3 5 5 1 0 0 (21.4%) (35.7%) (35.7%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.25 1.50 0.798 2 8 2 2 0 0 (14.3%) (57.1%) (14.3%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.33 1.64 0.809 3 6 3 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (21.4%) (42.9%) (21.4%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 14 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K MES P4182 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.00 1.09 0.302 0 10 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K MES P4182 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.00 1.09 0.302 0 10 1 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 0.95 1.00 0.000 0 11 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.06 1.18 0.405 0 9 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (81.8%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.95 3.00 0.000 0 0 0 11 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.17 1.50 0.926 3 6 0 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (27.3%) (54.5%) (0.0%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.00 1.09 0.302 0 10 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.83 2.82 0.405 0 0 2 9 0 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (18.2%) (81.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.70 1.82 0.751 0 4 5 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (36.4%) (45.5%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.00 1.09 0.302 0 10 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 0.90 1.00 0.000 6 5 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (54.5%) (45.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 0.83 1.00 0.000 8 3 0 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (72.7%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 0.90 1.00 0.000 6 5 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (54.5%) (45.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 0.90 1.00 0.000 6 5 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (54.5%) (45.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K MES P4182 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.00 1.20 0.447 6 4 1 0 0 0 (54.5%) (36.4%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 0.90 1.00 0.000 6 5 0 0 0 0 (54.5%) (45.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 0.90 1.00 0.000 6 5 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (54.5%) (45.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 25 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.07 1.28 0.843 0 21 3 0 0 1 (0.0%) (84.0%) (12.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (4.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.21 1.52 0.963 0 17 5 2 0 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (68.0%) (20.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%) (4.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 0.98 1.00 0.000 0 25 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.17 1.36 0.638 0 18 5 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (72.0%) (20.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.05 1.16 0.473 0 22 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (88.0%) (8.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.07 1.20 0.500 0 21 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (84.0%) (12.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.05 1.20 0.577 0 22 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (88.0%) (4.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.02 1.16 0.624 0 23 1 0 1 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (92.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.00 1.08 0.400 0 24 0 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (96.0%) (0.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.00 1.04 0.200 0 24 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (96.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 0.98 1.00 0.000 0 25 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.13 1.21 0.415 1 19 5 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (4.0%) (76.0%) (20.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.02 1.08 0.277 0 23 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (92.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 25 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.13 1.32 0.627 0 19 4 2 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (76.0%) (16.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.13 1.36 0.700 0 19 3 3 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (76.0%) (12.0%) (12.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.36 1.64 0.860 0 14 7 3 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (56.0%) (28.0%) (12.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.02 3.08 0.277 0 0 0 23 2 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (92.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.30 1.82 1.015 8 10 0 7 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (32.0%) (40.0%) (0.0%) (28.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.17 1.40 0.764 0 18 5 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (72.0%) (20.0%) (4.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.00 3.04 0.455 0 0 2 20 3 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (8.0%) (80.0%) (12.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.83 1.96 0.889 0 9 9 6 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (36.0%) (36.0%) (24.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.17 1.36 0.638 0 18 5 2 0 0 (0.0%) (72.0%) (20.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.12 1.24 0.437 8 13 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (32.0%) (52.0%) (16.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.08 1.21 0.579 11 12 1 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (44.0%) (48.0%) (4.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.12 1.35 0.786 8 13 3 0 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (32.0%) (52.0%) (12.0%) (0.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.30 1.56 0.814 9 10 3 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (36.0%) (40.0%) (12.0%) (12.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 25 STUDENTS RESPONDED KAMINSKI K ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.39 1.50 0.632 9 9 6 1 0 0 (36.0%) (36.0%) (24.0%) (4.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.12 1.35 0.702 8 13 2 2 0 0 (32.0%) (52.0%) (8.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.23 1.44 0.727 9 11 3 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (36.0%) (44.0%) (12.0%) (8.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 25 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 25 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 25 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 25 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 25 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 25 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 25 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 25 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 32 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M CMS 103 P3997 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.13 1.26 0.514 1 24 6 1 0 0 (3.1%) (75.0%) (18.8%) (3.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.59 1.84 0.969 1 14 11 3 3 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (3.1%) (43.8%) (34.4%) (9.4%) (9.4%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.38 1.87 1.176 1 17 6 4 3 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.1%) (53.1%) (18.8%) (12.5%) (9.4%) (3.1%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.83 2.10 1.165 1 11 12 4 2 2 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (3.1%) (34.4%) (37.5%) (12.5%) (6.3%) (6.3%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 2.30 2.23 1.055 1 11 5 12 3 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.1%) (34.4%) (15.6%) (37.5%) (9.4%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.50 2.10 1.319 3 14 5 5 3 2 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (9.4%) (43.8%) (15.6%) (15.6%) (9.4%) (6.3%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.65 1.73 0.785 2 13 13 3 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (6.3%) (40.6%) (40.6%) (9.4%) (3.1%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.59 1.77 0.845 1 14 11 5 1 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (3.1%) (43.8%) (34.4%) (15.6%) (3.1%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.29 1.57 0.817 2 19 5 6 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (6.3%) (59.4%) (15.6%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.29 1.61 0.955 1 19 7 4 0 1 (3.1%) (59.4%) (21.9%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (3.1%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.25 1.45 0.675 1 20 8 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (3.1%) (62.5%) (25.0%) (9.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 2.00 2.23 1.146 1 9 12 6 2 2

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (3.1%) (28.1%) (37.5%) (18.8%) (6.3%) (6.3%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.77 1.90 0.870 1 12 11 7 1 0 (3.1%) (37.5%) (34.4%) (21.9%) (3.1%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 32 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M CMS 103 P3997 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 2.05 2.23 1.055 1 9 11 6 5 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (3.1%) (28.1%) (34.4%) (18.8%) (15.6%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 2.04 2.23 1.087 1 8 13 7 1 2 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (3.1%) (25.0%) (40.6%) (21.9%) (3.1%) (6.3%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.75 2.70 1.208 2 6 6 12 3 3 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (6.3%) (18.8%) (18.8%) (37.5%) (9.4%) (9.4%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.14 3.23 0.497 1 0 1 22 8 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (3.1%) (0.0%) (3.1%) (68.8%) (25.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.17 2.39 1.145 1 7 12 7 3 2 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (3.1%) (21.9%) (37.5%) (21.9%) (9.4%) (6.3%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 2.50 2.48 1.092 1 7 8 11 4 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.1%) (21.9%) (25.0%) (34.4%) (12.5%) (3.1%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.08 3.13 0.763 1 1 3 19 7 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (3.1%) (3.1%) (9.4%) (59.4%) (21.9%) (3.1%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.32 2.39 0.955 1 6 11 10 4 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.1%) (18.8%) (34.4%) (31.3%) (12.5%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 2.19 2.35 1.050 1 6 13 9 1 2 (3.1%) (18.8%) (40.6%) (28.1%) (3.1%) (6.3%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.50 1.78 0.975 0 16 9 6 0 1 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (50.0%) (28.1%) (18.8%) (0.0%) (3.1%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.07 1.16 0.448 0 28 3 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (87.5%) (9.4%) (3.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.44 1.72 0.924 0 17 9 4 2 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (53.1%) (28.1%) (12.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.83 2.06 1.134 0 12 12 3 4 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (37.5%) (37.5%) (9.4%) (12.5%) (3.1%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 32 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M CMS 103 P3997 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 2.50 2.44 1.190 0 9 7 11 3 2 (0.0%) (28.1%) (21.9%) (34.4%) (9.4%) (6.3%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.81 1.94 0.948 0 12 13 4 3 0 (0.0%) (37.5%) (40.6%) (12.5%) (9.4%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 2.07 2.22 1.070 0 8 14 7 1 2 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (25.0%) (43.8%) (21.9%) (3.1%) (6.3%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 32 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 32 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 32 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 32 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 32 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 32 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 32 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 32 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M MES 305 P3016 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.14 1.28 0.575 0 14 3 1 0 0 (0.0%) (77.8%) (16.7%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.23 1.47 0.717 1 11 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (5.6%) (61.1%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.25 1.44 0.705 0 12 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.50 1.56 0.616 0 9 8 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (50.0%) (44.4%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.12 1.29 0.588 1 13 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.6%) (72.2%) (16.7%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.50 1.65 0.702 1 8 7 2 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (5.6%) (44.4%) (38.9%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.50 1.65 0.702 1 8 7 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (5.6%) (44.4%) (38.9%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.14 1.28 0.575 0 14 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (77.8%) (16.7%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.14 1.33 0.686 0 14 2 2 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (77.8%) (11.1%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.32 1.44 0.616 0 11 6 1 0 0 (0.0%) (61.1%) (33.3%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.19 1.33 0.594 0 13 4 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (72.2%) (22.2%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.40 1.56 0.705 0 10 6 2 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (55.6%) (33.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.25 1.44 0.705 0 12 4 2 0 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M MES 305 P3016 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.70 1.83 0.857 0 8 5 5 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (44.4%) (27.8%) (27.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.75 1.83 0.857 0 7 8 2 1 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (38.9%) (44.4%) (11.1%) (5.6%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.50 1.78 1.003 0 9 6 1 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (33.3%) (5.6%) (11.1%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.03 3.06 0.250 2 0 0 15 1 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (83.3%) (5.6%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 3.50 3.61 1.335 0 1 3 5 2 7 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (5.6%) (16.7%) (27.8%) (11.1%) (38.9%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.30 1.53 0.717 1 10 5 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.6%) (55.6%) (27.8%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.19 3.28 0.461 0 0 0 13 5 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (72.2%) (27.8%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.17 2.11 0.832 0 5 6 7 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (27.8%) (33.3%) (38.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.83 1.83 0.707 0 6 9 3 0 0 (0.0%) (33.3%) (50.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.75 1.80 0.789 8 4 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (44.4%) (22.2%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 2.50 2.13 0.991 10 3 1 4 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (55.6%) (16.7%) (5.6%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.83 1.80 0.632 8 3 6 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (44.4%) (16.7%) (33.3%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.50 1.75 0.886 10 4 2 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (55.6%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M MES 305 P3016 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.50 1.71 0.756 11 3 3 1 0 0 (61.1%) (16.7%) (16.7%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.70 1.70 0.675 8 4 5 1 0 0 (44.4%) (22.2%) (27.8%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.25 1.71 0.951 11 4 1 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (61.1%) (22.2%) (5.6%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 4 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M MES 310 G2607 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.50 1.50 0.577 0 2 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 2.00 2.00 0.816 0 1 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (25.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.50 1.50 0.577 0 2 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.50 1.67 0.577 1 1 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (25.0%) (25.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.83 1.75 0.500 0 1 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (25.0%) (75.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 2.50 2.25 0.957 0 1 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 0.83 1.00 0.000 1 3 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (25.0%) (75.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.50 1.50 0.577 0 2 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.50 1.50 0.577 0 2 2 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.50 1.50 0.577 0 2 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.50 1.75 0.957 0 2 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 2.50 2.25 0.957 0 1 1 2 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.50 1.50 0.577 0 2 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (50.0%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 4 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M MES 310 G2607 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 2.00 2.00 0.816 0 1 2 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (25.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.17 1.25 0.500 0 3 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.00 2.00 0.816 0 1 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (25.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.83 2.75 0.500 0 0 1 3 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (25.0%) (75.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.83 1.75 0.500 0 1 3 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (25.0%) (75.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.00 1.33 0.577 1 2 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (25.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.83 2.75 0.500 0 0 1 3 0 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (25.0%) (75.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.17 2.25 0.500 0 0 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 4 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.50 1.75 0.957 0 2 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.17 1.50 1.000 0 3 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (75.0%) (0.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.50 1.75 0.957 0 2 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.50 1.75 0.957 0 2 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 4 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M MES 310 G2607 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.50 1.75 0.957 0 2 1 1 0 0 (0.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 2.00 2.00 0.816 0 1 2 1 0 0 (0.0%) (25.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.50 1.75 0.957 0 2 1 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (50.0%) (25.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 4 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 4 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 4 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 4 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 4 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 4 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 4 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 4 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 3 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M COM 399 G2378 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 0.83 1.00 0.000 0 3 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 0.83 1.00 0.000 0 3 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.00 2.33 2.309 0 2 0 0 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.00 1.33 0.577 0 2 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.50 2.67 2.082 0 1 1 0 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (33.3%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 0.83 1.00 0.000 0 3 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.00 2.00 1.732 0 2 0 0 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.00 1.33 0.577 0 2 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 3 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M COM 399 G2378 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.00 2.33 2.309 0 2 0 0 0 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.50 2.33 1.155 0 1 0 2 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.00 2.00 1.732 0 2 0 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.50 2.67 0.577 0 0 1 2 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.50 1.67 0.577 0 1 2 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (33.3%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.00 3.33 0.577 0 0 0 2 1 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.50 2.33 1.155 0 1 0 2 0 0 (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 0.83 1.00 0.000 0 3 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.00 1.67 1.155 0 2 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.00 1.33 0.577 0 2 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 3 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M COM 399 G2378 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.00 2.00 1.732 0 2 0 0 1 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.00 2.00 1.732 0 2 0 0 1 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.00 1.33 0.577 0 2 1 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 57 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.15 1.27 0.522 1 43 11 2 0 0 (1.8%) (75.4%) (19.3%) (3.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.43 1.69 0.879 2 29 17 6 3 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (3.5%) (50.9%) (29.8%) (10.5%) (5.3%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.35 1.73 1.087 1 33 12 6 3 2 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.8%) (57.9%) (21.1%) (10.5%) (5.3%) (3.5%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.67 1.85 0.989 2 23 23 5 2 2 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (3.5%) (40.4%) (40.4%) (8.8%) (3.5%) (3.5%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.58 1.93 1.052 2 26 12 13 3 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.5%) (45.6%) (21.1%) (22.8%) (5.3%) (1.8%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.50 1.91 1.114 4 26 13 9 3 2 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (7.0%) (45.6%) (22.8%) (15.8%) (5.3%) (3.5%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.50 1.66 0.758 4 26 20 6 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (7.0%) (45.6%) (35.1%) (10.5%) (1.8%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.38 1.59 0.781 1 32 16 7 1 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (1.8%) (56.1%) (28.1%) (12.3%) (1.8%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.23 1.51 0.814 2 37 9 8 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (3.5%) (64.9%) (15.8%) (14.0%) (1.8%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.32 1.55 0.829 1 34 15 6 0 1 (1.8%) (59.6%) (26.3%) (10.5%) (0.0%) (1.8%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.26 1.43 0.657 1 37 14 5 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (1.8%) (64.9%) (24.6%) (8.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.82 1.98 1.036 1 22 19 11 2 2

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (1.8%) (38.6%) (33.3%) (19.3%) (3.5%) (3.5%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.50 1.71 0.825 1 28 17 10 1 0 (1.8%) (49.1%) (29.8%) (17.5%) (1.8%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 57 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.94 2.09 1.049 1 20 18 12 5 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (1.8%) (35.1%) (31.6%) (21.1%) (8.8%) (1.8%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.91 2.04 1.008 1 19 22 11 2 2 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (1.8%) (33.3%) (38.6%) (19.3%) (3.5%) (3.5%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.14 2.31 1.200 2 18 14 14 6 3 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.5%) (31.6%) (24.6%) (24.6%) (10.5%) (5.3%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.07 3.11 0.462 3 0 3 42 9 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (5.3%) (0.0%) (5.3%) (73.7%) (15.8%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.40 2.70 1.320 1 10 20 12 5 9 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (1.8%) (17.5%) (35.1%) (21.1%) (8.8%) (15.8%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.93 2.07 1.061 3 21 14 14 4 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.3%) (36.8%) (24.6%) (24.6%) (7.0%) (1.8%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.12 3.16 0.654 1 1 4 37 13 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (1.8%) (1.8%) (7.0%) (64.9%) (22.8%) (1.8%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.25 2.25 0.899 1 13 20 19 4 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.8%) (22.8%) (35.1%) (33.3%) (7.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 2.00 2.09 0.978 1 17 22 14 1 2 (1.8%) (29.8%) (38.6%) (24.6%) (1.8%) (3.5%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.46 1.73 0.908 8 25 14 9 0 1 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (14.0%) (43.9%) (24.6%) (15.8%) (0.0%) (1.8%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.14 1.38 0.739 10 36 4 7 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (17.5%) (63.2%) (7.0%) (12.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.50 1.73 0.861 8 24 16 7 2 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (14.0%) (42.1%) (28.1%) (12.3%) (3.5%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.69 1.94 1.051 10 20 16 6 4 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (17.5%) (35.1%) (28.1%) (10.5%) (7.0%) (1.8%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 57 STUDENTS RESPONDED KILLMEIER M ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 2.14 2.24 1.158 11 16 11 13 4 2 (19.3%) (28.1%) (19.3%) (22.8%) (7.0%) (3.5%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.75 1.90 0.918 8 19 20 6 4 0 (14.0%) (33.3%) (35.1%) (10.5%) (7.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.91 2.04 1.032 11 16 17 10 1 2 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (19.3%) (28.1%) (29.8%) (17.5%) (1.8%) (3.5%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 57 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 57 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 57 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 57 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 57 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 57 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 57 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 57 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 22 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R COM 340 P3071 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.29 1.64 0.953 0 14 3 4 1 0 (0.0%) (63.6%) (13.6%) (18.2%) (4.5%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.83 1.95 0.950 0 9 6 6 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (40.9%) (27.3%) (27.3%) (4.5%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.06 1.14 0.359 1 18 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (4.5%) (81.8%) (13.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.83 1.95 0.950 0 9 6 6 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (40.9%) (27.3%) (27.3%) (4.5%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.23 1.36 0.581 0 15 6 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (68.2%) (27.3%) (4.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.29 1.50 0.740 0 14 5 3 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (63.6%) (22.7%) (13.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 2.00 2.09 1.019 0 8 6 6 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (36.4%) (27.3%) (27.3%) (9.1%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.11 1.18 0.395 0 18 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (81.8%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.02 1.05 0.213 0 21 1 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (95.5%) (4.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.35 1.55 0.739 0 13 6 3 0 0 (0.0%) (59.1%) (27.3%) (13.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.23 1.32 0.477 0 15 7 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (68.2%) (31.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.23 1.50 0.859 0 15 4 2 1 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (68.2%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (4.5%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.15 1.36 0.790 0 17 3 1 1 0 (0.0%) (77.3%) (13.6%) (4.5%) (4.5%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 22 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R COM 340 P3071 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.80 1.86 0.834 0 8 10 3 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (36.4%) (45.5%) (13.6%) (4.5%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.93 2.00 0.926 0 8 7 6 1 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (36.4%) (31.8%) (27.3%) (4.5%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.00 2.14 1.125 0 9 4 6 3 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (40.9%) (18.2%) (27.3%) (13.6%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.13 3.23 0.612 0 0 1 16 4 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (4.5%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (4.5%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.10 2.24 1.136 1 7 5 7 1 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (4.5%) (31.8%) (22.7%) (31.8%) (4.5%) (4.5%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.50 1.82 0.907 0 11 4 7 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (18.2%) (31.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.20 3.27 0.883 0 0 4 10 6 2 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (18.2%) (45.5%) (27.3%) (9.1%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.90 1.95 0.844 0 7 10 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (31.8%) (45.5%) (18.2%) (4.5%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.88 1.95 0.899 0 8 8 5 1 0 (0.0%) (36.4%) (36.4%) (22.7%) (4.5%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.36 1.92 1.256 9 7 2 3 0 1 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (40.9%) (31.8%) (9.1%) (13.6%) (0.0%) (4.5%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.33 1.82 0.982 11 6 1 4 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (50.0%) (27.3%) (4.5%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 2.17 2.31 1.109 9 4 3 4 2 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (40.9%) (18.2%) (13.6%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.50 2.09 1.044 11 5 0 6 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (50.0%) (22.7%) (0.0%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 22 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R COM 340 P3071 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 2.50 2.36 1.027 11 3 2 5 1 0 (50.0%) (13.6%) (9.1%) (22.7%) (4.5%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 2.17 2.38 1.261 9 4 3 4 1 1 (40.9%) (18.2%) (13.6%) (18.2%) (4.5%) (4.5%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 2.67 2.25 1.138 10 5 0 6 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (45.5%) (22.7%) (0.0%) (27.3%) (4.5%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 22 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 22 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 22 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 22 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 22 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 22 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 22 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 22 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (83.3%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.03 1.06 0.236 0 17 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (94.4%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R COM 390 P3050 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.25 1.39 0.608 0 12 5 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (66.7%) (27.8%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.32 1.72 1.127 0 11 4 0 3 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (61.1%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (16.7%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.32 1.50 0.707 0 11 5 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (61.1%) (27.8%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.06 3.11 0.323 0 0 0 16 2 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (88.9%) (11.1%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.90 2.11 1.132 0 7 5 3 3 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (38.9%) (27.8%) (16.7%) (16.7%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.14 1.28 0.575 0 14 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (77.8%) (16.7%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.32 3.44 0.616 0 0 0 11 6 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (61.1%) (33.3%) (5.6%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.72 1.72 0.669 0 7 9 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (38.9%) (50.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.32 1.39 0.502 0 11 7 0 0 0 (0.0%) (61.1%) (38.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.17 1.46 0.776 5 9 2 2 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (27.8%) (50.0%) (11.1%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.00 1.22 0.667 9 8 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (50.0%) (44.4%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.05 1.17 0.577 6 11 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (33.3%) (61.1%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.07 1.44 0.882 9 7 0 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (50.0%) (38.9%) (0.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R COM 390 P3050 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.07 1.44 0.882 9 7 0 2 0 0 (50.0%) (38.9%) (0.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.00 1.18 0.603 7 10 0 1 0 0 (38.9%) (55.6%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.13 1.40 0.843 8 8 0 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (44.4%) (44.4%) (0.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (7.7%) (69.2%) (23.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.10 1.17 0.389 1 10 2 0 0 0 (7.7%) (76.9%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 13 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R COM 495 P3027 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.50 1.83 1.030 1 6 3 2 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (7.7%) (46.2%) (23.1%) (15.4%) (7.7%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.25 1.58 1.165 1 8 3 0 0 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (7.7%) (61.5%) (23.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (7.7%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.36 1.75 1.055 1 7 2 2 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (7.7%) (53.8%) (15.4%) (15.4%) (7.7%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.10 3.25 0.622 1 0 0 10 1 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (76.9%) (7.7%) (7.7%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.83 1.83 0.718 1 4 6 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (7.7%) (30.8%) (46.2%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.05 1.08 0.289 1 11 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (7.7%) (84.6%) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.17 3.25 0.452 1 0 0 9 3 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (69.2%) (23.1%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.75 2.00 1.206 1 5 4 2 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (7.7%) (38.5%) (30.8%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (7.7%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.36 1.50 0.674 1 7 4 1 0 0 (7.7%) (53.8%) (30.8%) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.00 1.67 1.155 10 2 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (76.9%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? N/A 3.00 N/A 12 0 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (92.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.00 1.00 0.000 11 2 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (84.6%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 13 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R COM 495 P3027 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.00 1.00 0.000 11 2 0 0 0 0 (84.6%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? N/A 1.00 N/A 12 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (92.3%) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 13 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 53 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.13 1.35 0.738 1 41 5 5 1 0 (1.9%) (77.4%) (9.4%) (9.4%) (1.9%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.22 1.46 0.779 1 36 9 6 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (1.9%) (67.9%) (17.0%) (11.3%) (1.9%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.08 1.14 0.351 3 43 7 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.7%) (81.1%) (13.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.33 1.59 0.804 2 30 13 7 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (3.8%) (56.6%) (24.5%) (13.2%) (1.9%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.17 1.27 0.490 1 39 12 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (73.6%) (22.6%) (1.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.19 1.35 0.594 2 36 12 3 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (3.8%) (67.9%) (22.6%) (5.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.46 1.77 0.942 1 27 13 9 3 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (1.9%) (50.9%) (24.5%) (17.0%) (5.7%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.09 1.15 0.364 1 44 8 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (1.9%) (83.0%) (15.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.03 1.06 0.235 1 49 3 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (1.9%) (92.5%) (5.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.17 1.37 0.768 1 39 9 3 0 1 (1.9%) (73.6%) (17.0%) (5.7%) (0.0%) (1.9%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.09 1.15 0.364 1 44 8 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (1.9%) (83.0%) (15.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.17 1.33 0.648 1 39 10 2 1 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (1.9%) (73.6%) (18.9%) (3.8%) (1.9%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.09 1.21 0.572 1 44 6 1 1 0 (1.9%) (83.0%) (11.3%) (1.9%) (1.9%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 53 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.50 1.69 0.829 1 26 18 6 2 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (1.9%) (49.1%) (34.0%) (11.3%) (3.8%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.46 1.81 1.049 1 27 14 6 4 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (1.9%) (50.9%) (26.4%) (11.3%) (7.5%) (1.9%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.46 1.83 1.004 1 27 11 10 4 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (50.9%) (20.8%) (18.9%) (7.5%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.10 3.19 0.525 1 0 1 42 7 2 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (1.9%) (0.0%) (1.9%) (79.2%) (13.2%) (3.8%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.94 2.10 1.044 2 18 16 12 4 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (3.8%) (34.0%) (30.2%) (22.6%) (7.5%) (1.9%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.22 1.46 0.753 1 36 8 8 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (67.9%) (15.1%) (15.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.23 3.33 0.706 1 0 4 30 15 3 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (1.9%) (0.0%) (7.5%) (56.6%) (28.3%) (5.7%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.80 1.88 0.878 1 19 23 8 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (35.8%) (43.4%) (15.1%) (1.9%) (1.9%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.50 1.65 0.764 1 26 19 6 1 0 (1.9%) (49.1%) (35.8%) (11.3%) (1.9%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.28 1.69 1.039 24 18 4 6 0 1 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (45.3%) (34.0%) (7.5%) (11.3%) (0.0%) (1.9%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.21 1.62 0.921 32 14 1 6 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (60.4%) (26.4%) (1.9%) (11.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.26 1.70 1.031 26 17 3 5 2 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (49.1%) (32.1%) (5.7%) (9.4%) (3.8%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.33 1.80 1.005 33 12 0 8 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (62.3%) (22.6%) (0.0%) (15.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 53 STUDENTS RESPONDED KIVATISKY R ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.50 1.95 1.050 33 10 2 7 1 0 (62.3%) (18.9%) (3.8%) (13.2%) (1.9%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.31 1.77 1.142 27 16 3 5 1 1 (50.9%) (30.2%) (5.7%) (9.4%) (1.9%) (1.9%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.29 1.83 1.072 30 14 0 8 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (56.6%) (26.4%) (0.0%) (15.1%) (1.9%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKHART J MES 220 P3398 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.21 1.36 0.505 0 7 4 0 0 0 (0.0%) (63.6%) (36.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.06 1.27 0.647 0 9 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (81.8%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.00 1.18 0.603 0 10 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (90.9%) (0.0%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.21 1.45 0.688 0 7 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (63.6%) (27.3%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.33 1.73 0.905 0 6 2 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (54.5%) (18.2%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.13 1.36 0.674 0 8 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.33 1.55 0.688 0 6 4 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (54.5%) (36.4%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.13 1.45 0.820 0 8 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (72.7%) (9.1%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.13 1.36 0.674 0 8 2 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.90 1.90 0.738 1 3 5 2 0 0 (9.1%) (27.3%) (45.5%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.13 1.36 0.674 0 8 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.33 1.55 0.688 0 6 4 1 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (54.5%) (36.4%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.06 1.27 0.647 0 9 1 1 0 0 (0.0%) (81.8%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKHART J MES 220 P3398 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.13 1.36 0.674 0 8 2 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.50 1.73 0.786 0 5 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (45.5%) (36.4%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.33 1.73 1.009 0 6 3 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (54.5%) (27.3%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.13 3.36 0.674 0 0 0 8 2 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.67 2.30 0.949 1 3 1 6 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (9.1%) (27.3%) (9.1%) (54.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.33 2.00 1.265 0 6 1 2 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (54.5%) (9.1%) (18.2%) (18.2%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.88 2.91 0.539 0 0 2 8 1 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (18.2%) (72.7%) (9.1%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.30 2.36 0.674 0 1 5 5 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (9.1%) (45.5%) (45.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.13 1.55 0.934 0 8 0 3 0 0 (0.0%) (72.7%) (0.0%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.25 1.50 0.837 5 4 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (45.5%) (36.4%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 2.17 2.40 0.548 6 0 3 2 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (54.5%) (0.0%) (27.3%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.50 1.67 0.816 5 3 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (45.5%) (27.3%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.17 1.80 1.095 6 3 0 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (54.5%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKHART J MES 220 P3398 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.17 1.80 1.095 6 3 0 2 0 0 (54.5%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.83 1.83 0.753 5 2 3 1 0 0 (45.5%) (18.2%) (27.3%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.17 1.80 1.095 6 3 0 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (54.5%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A 1.00 N/A 10 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 1.00 N/A 10 1 0 0 0 0 (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 1.00 N/A 10 1 0 0 0 0 (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A 1.00 N/A 10 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 8 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 294 G2526 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.17 1.25 0.463 0 6 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.30 1.50 0.756 0 5 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (62.5%) (25.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.17 1.25 0.463 0 6 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.50 1.63 0.744 0 4 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (50.0%) (37.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.07 1.25 0.707 0 7 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (87.5%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.10 1.43 0.787 1 5 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (12.5%) (62.5%) (12.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.30 1.75 1.165 0 5 1 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (62.5%) (12.5%) (12.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.07 1.13 0.354 0 7 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (87.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.07 1.13 0.354 0 7 1 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (87.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 8 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.17 1.25 0.463 0 6 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.30 1.38 0.518 0 5 3 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (62.5%) (37.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.17 1.25 0.463 0 6 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 8 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 294 G2526 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.17 1.38 0.744 0 6 1 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (75.0%) (12.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.30 1.38 0.518 0 5 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (62.5%) (37.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.17 1.25 0.463 0 6 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.00 3.13 0.835 0 0 1 6 0 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (75.0%) (0.0%) (12.5%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.30 1.88 1.356 0 5 1 0 2 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (62.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.17 1.50 1.069 0 6 1 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (75.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.17 3.38 0.744 0 0 0 6 1 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (75.0%) (12.5%) (12.5%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.30 1.75 1.165 0 5 1 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (62.5%) (12.5%) (12.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 8 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.17 1.38 0.744 0 6 1 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (75.0%) (12.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.00 1.00 0.000 0 8 0 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.50 1.75 1.035 0 4 3 0 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (50.0%) (37.5%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.17 1.25 0.463 0 6 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 8 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 294 G2526 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.30 1.38 0.518 0 5 3 0 0 0 (0.0%) (62.5%) (37.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.17 1.38 0.744 0 6 1 1 0 0 (0.0%) (75.0%) (12.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.30 1.50 0.756 0 5 2 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (62.5%) (25.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A 3.00 N/A 7 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (87.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 3.00 N/A 7 0 0 1 0 0 (87.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 3.00 N/A 7 0 0 1 0 0 (87.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A 3.00 N/A 7 0 0 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (87.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 8 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 8 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 8 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 8 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 370 G2614 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.13 1.36 0.674 0 8 2 1 0 0 (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.13 1.36 0.674 0 8 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.00 1.09 0.302 0 10 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (90.9%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.21 1.40 0.699 1 7 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (9.1%) (63.6%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.21 1.30 0.483 1 7 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (9.1%) (63.6%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.13 1.45 0.820 0 8 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (72.7%) (9.1%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.13 1.45 0.820 0 8 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (72.7%) (9.1%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.21 1.60 1.265 1 7 2 0 0 1 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (9.1%) (63.6%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (9.1%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.06 1.36 0.924 0 9 1 0 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (81.8%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (9.1%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.06 1.27 0.647 0 9 1 1 0 0 (0.0%) (81.8%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.13 1.27 0.467 0 8 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (72.7%) (27.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.13 1.20 0.422 1 8 2 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (9.1%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.21 1.55 0.820 0 7 2 2 0 0 (0.0%) (63.6%) (18.2%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 370 G2614 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.13 1.55 1.036 0 8 1 1 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (72.7%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.21 1.73 1.272 0 7 2 1 0 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (63.6%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (9.1%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.21 1.64 1.027 0 7 2 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (63.6%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.94 2.90 0.316 1 0 1 9 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (9.1%) (0.0%) (9.1%) (81.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.33 2.00 1.414 0 6 2 1 1 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (54.5%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (9.1%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.13 1.45 0.820 0 8 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (72.7%) (9.1%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.00 3.09 0.539 0 0 1 8 2 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (9.1%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.50 1.73 0.786 0 5 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (45.5%) (36.4%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.21 1.73 1.272 0 7 2 1 0 1 (0.0%) (63.6%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (9.1%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.33 1.91 1.136 0 6 1 3 1 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (54.5%) (9.1%) (27.3%) (9.1%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.13 1.55 1.036 0 8 1 1 1 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (72.7%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.21 1.64 1.027 0 7 2 1 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (63.6%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (9.1%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.21 1.55 0.820 0 7 2 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (63.6%) (18.2%) (18.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 11 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 370 G2614 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.21 1.45 0.688 0 7 3 1 0 0 (0.0%) (63.6%) (27.3%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.13 1.36 0.674 0 8 2 1 0 0 (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.13 1.36 0.674 0 8 2 1 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (72.7%) (18.2%) (9.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A 5.00 N/A 10 0 0 0 0 1 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (90.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (9.1%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 5.00 N/A 10 0 0 0 0 1 (90.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (9.1%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 5.00 N/A 10 0 0 0 0 1 (90.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (9.1%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A 5.00 N/A 10 0 0 0 0 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (90.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (9.1%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 11 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 9 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 486 P3891 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.17 1.67 1.323 0 6 2 0 0 1 (0.0%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (11.1%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.07 1.13 0.354 1 7 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (11.1%) (77.8%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.30 1.67 0.866 0 5 2 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (55.6%) (22.2%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.30 1.44 0.527 0 5 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (55.6%) (44.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.30 1.56 0.726 0 5 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (55.6%) (33.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.30 1.56 0.726 0 5 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (55.6%) (33.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.07 1.44 0.882 0 7 0 2 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (77.8%) (0.0%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.17 1.56 0.882 0 6 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (11.1%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 9 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 486 P3891 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.17 1.44 0.726 0 6 2 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.17 1.44 0.726 0 6 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.30 1.44 0.527 0 5 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (55.6%) (44.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.00 3.11 0.333 0 0 0 8 1 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (88.9%) (11.1%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.30 1.78 0.972 0 5 1 3 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (55.6%) (11.1%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.75 3.89 0.782 0 0 0 3 4 2 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (33.3%) (44.4%) (22.2%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.50 1.67 0.707 0 4 4 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (44.4%) (44.4%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.07 1.33 0.707 0 7 1 1 0 0 (0.0%) (77.8%) (11.1%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.00 1.40 0.894 4 4 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (44.4%) (44.4%) (0.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 0.83 1.00 0.000 6 3 0 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.00 1.20 0.447 4 4 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (44.4%) (44.4%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 0.83 1.00 0.000 6 3 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 9 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R COM 486 P3891 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 0.83 1.00 0.000 6 3 0 0 0 0 (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 0.90 1.00 0.000 4 5 0 0 0 0 (44.4%) (55.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 0.83 1.00 0.000 6 3 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 28 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.20 1.43 0.879 0 20 6 1 0 1 (0.0%) (71.4%) (21.4%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (3.6%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.24 1.39 0.629 0 19 7 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (67.9%) (25.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.07 1.15 0.362 1 23 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.6%) (82.1%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.31 1.56 0.751 1 16 7 4 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (3.6%) (57.1%) (25.0%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.18 1.33 0.555 1 19 7 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.6%) (67.9%) (25.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.18 1.41 0.694 1 19 5 3 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (3.6%) (67.9%) (17.9%) (10.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.28 1.57 0.879 0 18 5 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (64.3%) (17.9%) (14.3%) (3.6%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.18 1.44 0.892 1 19 6 1 0 1 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (3.6%) (67.9%) (21.4%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (3.6%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.11 1.32 0.772 0 23 2 2 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (82.1%) (7.1%) (7.1%) (3.6%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.11 1.21 0.499 0 23 4 1 0 0 (0.0%) (82.1%) (14.3%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.20 1.36 0.621 0 20 6 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (71.4%) (21.4%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.18 1.30 0.465 1 19 8 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (3.6%) (67.9%) (28.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.24 1.39 0.629 0 19 7 2 0 0 (0.0%) (67.9%) (25.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 28 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.20 1.46 0.838 0 20 4 3 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (71.4%) (14.3%) (10.7%) (3.6%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.28 1.54 0.922 0 18 7 2 0 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (64.3%) (25.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (3.6%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.28 1.46 0.744 0 18 8 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (64.3%) (28.6%) (3.6%) (3.6%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.98 3.04 0.518 1 0 2 23 1 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (3.6%) (0.0%) (7.1%) (82.1%) (3.6%) (3.6%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.38 1.89 1.227 0 16 4 4 3 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (57.1%) (14.3%) (14.3%) (10.7%) (3.6%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.20 1.43 0.790 0 20 5 2 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (71.4%) (17.9%) (7.1%) (3.6%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.26 3.43 0.742 0 0 1 17 7 3 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (60.7%) (25.0%) (10.7%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.50 1.71 0.854 0 14 9 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (32.1%) (14.3%) (3.6%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.14 1.39 0.916 0 22 3 2 0 1 (0.0%) (78.6%) (10.7%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (3.6%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.25 1.63 0.970 4 16 2 5 1 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (14.3%) (57.1%) (7.1%) (17.9%) (3.6%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.08 1.27 0.767 6 19 1 1 1 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (21.4%) (67.9%) (3.6%) (3.6%) (3.6%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.30 1.58 0.929 4 15 6 1 2 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (14.3%) (53.6%) (21.4%) (3.6%) (7.1%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.19 1.36 0.658 6 16 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (21.4%) (57.1%) (14.3%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 28 STUDENTS RESPONDED LOCKRIDGE R ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.23 1.36 0.581 6 15 6 1 0 0 (21.4%) (53.6%) (21.4%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.13 1.29 0.624 4 19 3 2 0 0 (14.3%) (67.9%) (10.7%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.19 1.36 0.658 6 16 4 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (21.4%) (57.1%) (14.3%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 3.50 4.00 1.414 26 0 0 1 0 1 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (92.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (3.6%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 3.50 4.00 1.414 26 0 0 1 0 1 (92.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (3.6%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 3.50 4.00 1.414 26 0 0 1 0 1 (92.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (3.6%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? 3.50 4.00 1.414 26 0 0 1 0 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (92.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (3.6%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 37 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D CMS 103 P3080 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.05 1.19 0.701 0 33 3 0 0 1 (0.0%) (89.2%) (8.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (2.7%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.17 1.41 0.762 0 27 6 3 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (73.0%) (16.2%) (8.1%) (2.7%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.14 1.30 0.618 0 28 8 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (75.7%) (21.6%) (0.0%) (2.7%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.40 1.56 0.735 1 20 13 2 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (2.7%) (54.1%) (35.1%) (5.4%) (2.7%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.32 1.51 0.731 0 22 12 2 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (59.5%) (32.4%) (5.4%) (2.7%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.25 1.57 0.929 0 24 8 2 3 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (64.9%) (21.6%) (5.4%) (8.1%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.22 1.43 0.728 0 25 9 2 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (67.6%) (24.3%) (5.4%) (2.7%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.40 1.68 0.884 0 20 11 4 2 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (54.1%) (29.7%) (10.8%) (5.4%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.22 1.50 0.910 1 25 7 1 3 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (2.7%) (67.6%) (18.9%) (2.7%) (8.1%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.17 1.35 0.633 0 27 7 3 0 0 (0.0%) (73.0%) (18.9%) (8.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.07 1.17 0.453 2 30 4 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (5.4%) (81.1%) (10.8%) (2.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.79 1.92 0.924 0 13 17 5 1 1

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (35.1%) (45.9%) (13.5%) (2.7%) (2.7%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.25 1.46 0.691 0 24 9 4 0 0 (0.0%) (64.9%) (24.3%) (10.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 37 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D CMS 103 P3080 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.40 1.68 0.884 0 20 11 4 2 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (54.1%) (29.7%) (10.8%) (5.4%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.58 1.75 0.906 1 17 13 5 0 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (2.7%) (45.9%) (35.1%) (13.5%) (0.0%) (2.7%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.93 2.00 0.828 1 9 21 3 3 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.7%) (24.3%) (56.8%) (8.1%) (8.1%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.12 3.22 0.417 0 0 0 29 8 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (78.4%) (21.6%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.04 2.08 0.862 0 11 13 12 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (29.7%) (35.1%) (32.4%) (2.7%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.64 1.81 0.877 0 16 14 5 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (43.2%) (37.8%) (13.5%) (5.4%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.11 3.16 0.727 0 1 3 23 9 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (2.7%) (8.1%) (62.2%) (24.3%) (2.7%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.24 2.27 0.652 0 4 19 14 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (10.8%) (51.4%) (37.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.40 1.59 0.762 0 20 13 3 1 0 (0.0%) (54.1%) (35.1%) (8.1%) (2.7%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.36 1.64 0.867 1 21 8 6 1 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (2.7%) (56.8%) (21.6%) (16.2%) (2.7%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.06 1.22 0.681 1 32 1 2 1 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (2.7%) (86.5%) (2.7%) (5.4%) (2.7%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.28 1.64 1.099 1 23 8 2 1 2 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (2.7%) (62.2%) (21.6%) (5.4%) (2.7%) (5.4%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.36 1.58 0.806 1 21 10 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.7%) (56.8%) (27.0%) (10.8%) (2.7%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 37 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D CMS 103 P3080 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.88 2.08 1.131 1 13 13 6 2 2 (2.7%) (35.1%) (35.1%) (16.2%) (5.4%) (5.4%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.19 1.42 0.770 1 26 6 3 1 0 (2.7%) (70.3%) (16.2%) (8.1%) (2.7%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.60 1.86 0.990 1 17 10 6 3 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (2.7%) (45.9%) (27.0%) (16.2%) (8.1%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A 1.00 N/A 36 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (97.3%) (2.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 2.00 N/A 36 0 1 0 0 0 (97.3%) (0.0%) (2.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 1.00 N/A 36 1 0 0 0 0 (97.3%) (2.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A 1.00 N/A 36 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (97.3%) (2.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 37 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 37 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 37 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 37 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 28 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D CMS 200 P4016 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.06 1.18 0.612 0 25 2 0 1 0 (0.0%) (89.3%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.24 1.39 0.685 0 19 8 0 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (67.9%) (28.6%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.11 1.21 0.499 0 23 4 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (82.1%) (14.3%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.43 1.61 0.786 0 15 10 2 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (53.6%) (35.7%) (7.1%) (3.6%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.38 1.50 0.638 0 16 10 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (57.1%) (35.7%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.38 1.50 0.638 0 16 10 2 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (57.1%) (35.7%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.20 1.39 0.737 0 20 6 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (71.4%) (21.4%) (3.6%) (3.6%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.28 1.43 0.634 0 18 8 2 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (64.3%) (28.6%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.28 1.43 0.634 0 18 8 2 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (64.3%) (28.6%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.17 1.25 0.441 0 21 7 0 0 0 (0.0%) (75.0%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.04 1.14 0.591 0 26 1 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (92.9%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.38 1.46 0.576 0 16 11 1 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (57.1%) (39.3%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.24 1.39 0.629 0 19 7 2 0 0 (0.0%) (67.9%) (25.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 28 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D CMS 200 P4016 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.43 1.57 0.742 0 15 11 1 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (53.6%) (39.3%) (3.6%) (3.6%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.94 2.07 1.052 0 10 9 7 1 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (35.7%) (32.1%) (25.0%) (3.6%) (3.6%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.73 1.82 0.863 0 11 13 2 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (39.3%) (46.4%) (7.1%) (7.1%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.11 3.18 0.390 0 0 0 23 5 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (82.1%) (17.9%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.39 2.46 1.105 0 6 9 8 4 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (21.4%) (32.1%) (28.6%) (14.3%) (3.6%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.14 1.29 0.659 0 22 5 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (78.6%) (17.9%) (0.0%) (3.6%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.20 3.32 0.548 0 0 0 20 7 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (71.4%) (25.0%) (3.6%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.90 1.93 0.675 1 7 15 5 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.6%) (25.0%) (53.6%) (17.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.67 1.79 0.876 0 12 12 2 2 0 (0.0%) (42.9%) (42.9%) (7.1%) (7.1%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.28 1.39 0.567 0 18 9 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (64.3%) (32.1%) (3.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.04 1.07 0.262 0 26 2 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (92.9%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.24 1.39 0.629 0 19 7 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (67.9%) (25.0%) (7.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.22 1.33 0.480 1 18 9 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.6%) (64.3%) (32.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 28 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D CMS 200 P4016 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.88 2.07 1.120 0 11 8 6 2 1 (0.0%) (39.3%) (28.6%) (21.4%) (7.1%) (3.6%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.20 1.39 0.685 0 20 5 3 0 0 (0.0%) (71.4%) (17.9%) (10.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.70 1.85 0.864 1 11 10 5 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (3.6%) (39.3%) (35.7%) (17.9%) (3.6%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 28 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 16 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D MES 400 P3534 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 0.97 1.00 0.000 1 15 0 0 0 0 (6.3%) (93.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.00 1.07 0.258 1 14 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (6.3%) (87.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.00 1.07 0.258 1 14 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (6.3%) (87.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.04 1.13 0.352 1 13 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (6.3%) (81.3%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.04 1.07 0.267 2 13 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (12.5%) (81.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.00 1.07 0.258 1 14 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (6.3%) (87.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.00 1.07 0.258 1 14 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (6.3%) (87.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.08 1.14 0.363 2 12 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (12.5%) (75.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.04 1.07 0.267 2 13 1 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (12.5%) (81.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.20 1.47 0.834 1 10 4 0 1 0 (6.3%) (62.5%) (25.0%) (0.0%) (6.3%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 0.97 1.00 0.000 1 15 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (6.3%) (93.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.00 1.07 0.258 1 14 1 0 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (6.3%) (87.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 0.97 1.00 0.000 1 15 0 0 0 0 (6.3%) (93.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 16 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D MES 400 P3534 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.14 1.29 0.611 2 11 2 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (12.5%) (68.8%) (12.5%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.08 1.14 0.363 2 12 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (12.5%) (75.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.04 1.07 0.267 2 13 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (12.5%) (81.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.00 3.08 0.277 3 0 0 12 1 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (18.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (75.0%) (6.3%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.33 1.91 1.044 5 6 0 5 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (31.3%) (37.5%) (0.0%) (31.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.08 1.14 0.363 2 12 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (12.5%) (75.0%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.64 3.64 0.633 2 0 0 6 7 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (37.5%) (43.8%) (6.3%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.20 1.36 0.633 2 10 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (12.5%) (62.5%) (18.8%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.00 1.08 0.277 3 12 1 0 0 0 (18.8%) (75.0%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.50 1.50 0.707 14 1 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (87.5%) (6.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.50 1.50 0.707 14 1 1 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (87.5%) (6.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.50 1.50 0.707 14 1 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (87.5%) (6.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.00 1.00 0.000 14 2 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (87.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 16 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D MES 400 P3534 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.00 1.00 0.000 14 2 0 0 0 0 (87.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.50 1.50 0.707 14 1 1 0 0 0 (87.5%) (6.3%) (6.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.00 1.00 0.000 14 2 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (87.5%) (12.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 16 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 81 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.05 1.15 0.597 1 73 5 0 1 1 (1.2%) (90.1%) (6.2%) (0.0%) (1.2%) (1.2%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.17 1.34 0.674 1 60 15 3 2 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (1.2%) (74.1%) (18.5%) (3.7%) (2.5%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.12 1.22 0.527 1 65 13 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.2%) (80.2%) (16.0%) (1.2%) (1.2%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.31 1.49 0.714 2 48 25 4 2 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (2.5%) (59.3%) (30.9%) (4.9%) (2.5%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.26 1.43 0.654 2 51 23 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.5%) (63.0%) (28.4%) (4.9%) (1.2%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.24 1.45 0.761 1 54 19 4 3 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (1.2%) (66.7%) (23.5%) (4.9%) (3.7%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.18 1.35 0.677 1 59 16 3 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (1.2%) (72.8%) (19.8%) (3.7%) (2.5%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.28 1.49 0.749 2 50 21 6 2 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (2.5%) (61.7%) (25.9%) (7.4%) (2.5%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.20 1.40 0.744 3 56 16 3 3 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (3.7%) (69.1%) (19.8%) (3.7%) (3.7%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.19 1.34 0.615 1 58 18 3 1 0 (1.2%) (71.6%) (22.2%) (3.7%) (1.2%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.05 1.13 0.466 3 71 5 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (3.7%) (87.7%) (6.2%) (1.2%) (1.2%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.43 1.60 0.789 1 43 29 6 1 1

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (1.2%) (53.1%) (35.8%) (7.4%) (1.2%) (1.2%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.19 1.35 0.618 1 58 16 6 0 0 (1.2%) (71.6%) (19.8%) (7.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 81 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.35 1.57 0.796 2 46 24 6 3 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (2.5%) (56.8%) (29.6%) (7.4%) (3.7%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.50 1.76 0.942 3 39 24 12 1 2 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (3.7%) (48.1%) (29.6%) (14.8%) (1.2%) (2.5%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.67 1.77 0.836 3 33 35 5 5 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.7%) (40.7%) (43.2%) (6.2%) (6.2%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.11 3.18 0.386 3 0 0 64 14 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (3.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (79.0%) (17.3%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.18 2.20 0.994 5 23 22 25 5 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (6.2%) (28.4%) (27.2%) (30.9%) (6.2%) (1.2%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.28 1.51 0.782 2 50 21 5 3 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.5%) (61.7%) (25.9%) (6.2%) (3.7%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.21 3.30 0.667 2 1 3 49 23 3 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (2.5%) (1.2%) (3.7%) (60.5%) (28.4%) (3.7%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.99 1.99 0.730 3 21 37 20 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.7%) (25.9%) (45.7%) (24.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.39 1.58 0.782 3 44 26 5 3 0 (3.7%) (54.3%) (32.1%) (6.2%) (3.7%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.32 1.53 0.749 15 40 18 7 1 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (18.5%) (49.4%) (22.2%) (8.6%) (1.2%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.06 1.17 0.543 15 59 4 2 1 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (18.5%) (72.8%) (4.9%) (2.5%) (1.2%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.27 1.53 0.915 15 43 16 4 1 2 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (18.5%) (53.1%) (19.8%) (4.9%) (1.2%) (2.5%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.28 1.46 0.686 16 41 19 4 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (19.8%) (50.6%) (23.5%) (4.9%) (1.2%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 81 STUDENTS RESPONDED PANICI D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.83 2.05 1.115 15 26 21 12 4 3 (18.5%) (32.1%) (25.9%) (14.8%) (4.9%) (3.7%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.20 1.41 0.723 15 47 12 6 1 0 (18.5%) (58.0%) (14.8%) (7.4%) (1.2%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.60 1.83 0.928 16 30 20 11 4 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (19.8%) (37.0%) (24.7%) (13.6%) (4.9%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A 1.00 N/A 80 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (98.8%) (1.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 2.00 N/A 80 0 1 0 0 0 (98.8%) (0.0%) (1.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A 1.00 N/A 80 1 0 0 0 0 (98.8%) (1.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A 1.00 N/A 80 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (98.8%) (1.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 81 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 81 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 81 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 81 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D MES 274 P3359 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.19 1.33 0.594 0 13 4 1 0 0 (0.0%) (72.2%) (22.2%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.61 1.67 0.767 0 8 9 0 1 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (44.4%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.50 1.89 1.132 0 9 5 1 3 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (50.0%) (27.8%) (5.6%) (16.7%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.40 1.56 0.705 0 10 6 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (55.6%) (33.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.39 1.59 0.712 1 9 6 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.6%) (50.0%) (33.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.61 1.61 0.608 0 8 9 1 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (44.4%) (50.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.63 1.67 0.686 0 8 8 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (44.4%) (44.4%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.25 1.39 0.608 0 12 5 1 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (66.7%) (27.8%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.12 1.29 0.588 1 13 3 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (5.6%) (72.2%) (16.7%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.32 1.50 0.707 0 11 5 2 0 0 (0.0%) (61.1%) (27.8%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.30 1.47 0.624 1 10 6 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (5.6%) (55.6%) (33.3%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.40 1.56 0.705 0 10 6 2 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (55.6%) (33.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.32 1.67 1.029 0 11 4 1 2 0 (0.0%) (61.1%) (22.2%) (5.6%) (11.1%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D MES 274 P3359 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.90 2.22 1.309 0 7 5 2 3 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (38.9%) (27.8%) (11.1%) (16.7%) (5.6%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 2.10 2.22 1.166 0 6 5 5 1 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (33.3%) (27.8%) (27.8%) (5.6%) (5.6%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 2.00 2.22 1.263 0 7 4 4 2 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (38.9%) (22.2%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (5.6%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.97 2.94 0.236 0 0 1 17 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (94.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.61 2.56 0.922 0 2 6 9 0 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (11.1%) (33.3%) (50.0%) (0.0%) (5.6%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.64 1.72 0.752 0 8 7 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (44.4%) (38.9%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.00 3.06 0.429 1 0 1 14 2 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (5.6%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (77.8%) (11.1%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.94 1.94 0.725 0 5 9 4 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (27.8%) (50.0%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 2.07 2.22 1.060 0 5 7 3 3 0 (0.0%) (27.8%) (38.9%) (16.7%) (16.7%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.08 1.27 0.594 3 12 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (16.7%) (66.7%) (11.1%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.00 1.13 0.516 3 14 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (16.7%) (77.8%) (0.0%) (5.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.28 1.53 0.743 3 9 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (16.7%) (50.0%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.28 1.60 0.828 3 9 3 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (16.7%) (50.0%) (16.7%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 18 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D MES 274 P3359 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.50 1.73 0.799 3 7 5 3 0 0 (16.7%) (38.9%) (27.8%) (16.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.38 1.67 0.900 3 8 5 1 1 0 (16.7%) (44.4%) (27.8%) (5.6%) (5.6%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.83 1.93 0.799 3 5 6 4 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (16.7%) (27.8%) (33.3%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 18 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (94.7%) (0.0%) (5.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.14 1.37 0.684 0 14 3 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (73.7%) (15.8%) (10.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.19 1.37 0.597 0 13 5 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (68.4%) (26.3%) (5.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 19 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D MES 340 P3452 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.14 1.42 0.769 0 14 2 3 0 0 (0.0%) (73.7%) (10.5%) (15.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.14 1.37 0.684 0 14 3 2 0 0 (0.0%) (73.7%) (15.8%) (10.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.25 1.68 1.108 0 12 3 3 0 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (63.2%) (15.8%) (15.8%) (0.0%) (5.3%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 17 2 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (89.5%) (10.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 17 2 0 0 0 0 (89.5%) (10.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 17 2 0 0 0 0 (89.5%) (10.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 17 2 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (89.5%) (10.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 19 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 19 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 19 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 19 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (53.3%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (13.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.50 1.71 0.756 8 3 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (53.3%) (20.0%) (20.0%) (6.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.83 2.00 0.816 8 2 3 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (53.3%) (13.3%) (20.0%) (13.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 15 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D MES 380 P3240 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.50 2.00 1.155 8 3 2 1 1 0 (53.3%) (20.0%) (13.3%) (6.7%) (6.7%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.25 1.86 1.215 8 4 1 1 1 0 (53.3%) (26.7%) (6.7%) (6.7%) (6.7%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.75 2.00 1.000 8 2 4 0 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (53.3%) (13.3%) (26.7%) (0.0%) (6.7%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 15 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 15 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 15 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 15 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 15 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 15 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 15 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 15 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 1 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D CMS 491 P4168 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 1 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D CMS 491 P4168 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? N/A 3.00 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? N/A 2.00 N/A 0 0 1 0 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? N/A 2.00 N/A 0 0 1 0 0 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? N/A 2.00 N/A 0 0 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) N/A 2.00 N/A 0 0 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 1 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D CMS 491 P4168 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? N/A 1.00 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 53 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.18 1.42 0.770 0 38 10 3 2 0 (0.0%) (71.7%) (18.9%) (5.7%) (3.8%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.37 1.62 0.882 0 30 16 5 1 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (56.6%) (30.2%) (9.4%) (1.9%) (1.9%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.56 1.87 1.038 0 25 16 7 4 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (47.2%) (30.2%) (13.2%) (7.5%) (1.9%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.50 1.73 0.910 1 26 17 7 1 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (1.9%) (49.1%) (32.1%) (13.2%) (1.9%) (1.9%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.56 1.79 0.977 1 25 18 5 3 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (47.2%) (34.0%) (9.4%) (5.7%) (1.9%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.50 1.77 0.993 0 26 18 6 1 2 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (49.1%) (34.0%) (11.3%) (1.9%) (3.8%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.46 1.64 0.811 0 27 20 5 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (50.9%) (37.7%) (9.4%) (0.0%) (1.9%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.31 1.53 0.749 0 32 15 5 1 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (60.4%) (28.3%) (9.4%) (1.9%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.15 1.37 0.768 1 40 7 3 2 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (1.9%) (75.5%) (13.2%) (5.7%) (3.8%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.15 1.34 0.649 0 40 8 5 0 0 (0.0%) (75.5%) (15.1%) (9.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.29 1.60 1.015 1 33 13 2 2 2 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (1.9%) (62.3%) (24.5%) (3.8%) (3.8%) (3.8%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.46 1.79 1.035 1 27 14 8 1 2

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (1.9%) (50.9%) (26.4%) (15.1%) (1.9%) (3.8%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.43 1.81 1.057 0 28 13 7 4 1 (0.0%) (52.8%) (24.5%) (13.2%) (7.5%) (1.9%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 53 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 2.06 2.23 1.148 1 17 16 11 6 2 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (1.9%) (32.1%) (30.2%) (20.8%) (11.3%) (3.8%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.72 1.88 0.963 1 22 18 9 2 1 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (1.9%) (41.5%) (34.0%) (17.0%) (3.8%) (1.9%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.77 2.02 1.129 1 22 15 9 4 2 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (41.5%) (28.3%) (17.0%) (7.5%) (3.8%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.00 3.00 0.524 1 1 3 44 3 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (1.9%) (1.9%) (5.7%) (83.0%) (5.7%) (1.9%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.31 2.46 1.244 1 13 16 15 2 6 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (1.9%) (24.5%) (30.2%) (28.3%) (3.8%) (11.3%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.46 1.65 0.796 2 26 19 4 2 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.8%) (49.1%) (35.8%) (7.5%) (3.8%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.09 3.16 0.612 2 0 5 34 11 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (3.8%) (0.0%) (9.4%) (64.2%) (20.8%) (1.9%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.24 2.29 0.977 1 12 19 16 4 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (1.9%) (22.6%) (35.8%) (30.2%) (7.5%) (1.9%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.64 1.92 1.064 1 24 14 9 4 1 (1.9%) (45.3%) (26.4%) (17.0%) (7.5%) (1.9%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.08 1.23 0.571 10 36 4 3 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (18.9%) (67.9%) (7.5%) (5.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.05 1.19 0.594 11 38 0 4 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (20.8%) (71.7%) (0.0%) (7.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.28 1.48 0.707 11 27 10 5 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (20.8%) (50.9%) (18.9%) (9.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.34 1.55 0.739 11 25 11 6 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (20.8%) (47.2%) (20.8%) (11.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 53 STUDENTS RESPONDED PIERSON D ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.34 1.62 0.854 11 25 9 7 1 0 (20.8%) (47.2%) (17.0%) (13.2%) (1.9%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.28 1.55 0.861 11 27 9 4 2 0 (20.8%) (50.9%) (17.0%) (7.5%) (3.8%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.58 1.81 0.969 11 20 13 7 1 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (20.8%) (37.7%) (24.5%) (13.2%) (1.9%) (1.9%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 51 2 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (96.2%) (3.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 51 2 0 0 0 0 (96.2%) (3.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.00 1.00 0.000 51 2 0 0 0 0 (96.2%) (3.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? 1.00 1.00 0.000 51 2 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (96.2%) (3.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 53 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 9 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L COM 380 P3432 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.17 1.44 0.726 0 6 2 1 0 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.30 1.89 1.364 0 5 2 1 0 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (55.6%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (11.1%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.17 1.25 0.463 1 6 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (11.1%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.30 1.56 0.726 0 5 3 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (55.6%) (33.3%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.30 1.78 0.972 0 5 1 3 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (55.6%) (11.1%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.00 1.11 0.333 0 8 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (88.9%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.07 1.13 0.354 1 7 1 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (11.1%) (77.8%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.07 1.22 0.441 0 7 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (77.8%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.07 1.44 1.014 0 7 1 0 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (77.8%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.30 1.89 1.364 0 5 2 1 0 1

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (55.6%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (11.1%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.17 1.33 0.500 0 6 3 0 0 0 (0.0%) (66.7%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 9 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L COM 380 P3432 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 2.00 2.33 1.323 0 3 2 3 0 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (33.3%) (22.2%) (33.3%) (0.0%) (11.1%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.50 1.78 0.972 0 4 4 0 1 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (44.4%) (44.4%) (0.0%) (11.1%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.50 1.89 1.054 0 4 3 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (44.4%) (33.3%) (11.1%) (11.1%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.07 3.33 0.707 0 0 0 7 1 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (77.8%) (11.1%) (11.1%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.00 2.29 1.113 2 2 2 2 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (22.2%) (22.2%) (22.2%) (22.2%) (11.1%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.30 1.63 0.916 1 5 1 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (11.1%) (55.6%) (11.1%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.17 3.44 0.726 0 0 0 6 2 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (66.7%) (22.2%) (11.1%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.75 1.89 0.782 0 3 4 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (33.3%) (44.4%) (22.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.50 1.56 0.527 0 4 5 0 0 0 (0.0%) (44.4%) (55.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? N/A 1.00 N/A 8 1 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (88.9%) (11.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 9 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L COM 380 P3432 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 9 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 17 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L COM 375 P3677 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.23 1.35 0.493 0 11 6 0 0 0 (0.0%) (64.7%) (35.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.50 1.63 0.719 1 8 6 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (5.9%) (47.1%) (35.3%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.07 1.13 0.342 1 14 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (5.9%) (82.4%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.64 1.69 0.704 1 7 7 2 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (5.9%) (41.2%) (41.2%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.17 1.29 0.470 0 12 5 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (70.6%) (29.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.30 1.53 0.717 0 10 5 2 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (58.8%) (29.4%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.64 1.76 0.752 0 7 7 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (41.2%) (41.2%) (17.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.17 1.29 0.470 0 12 5 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (70.6%) (29.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.17 1.29 0.470 0 12 5 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (70.6%) (29.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.03 1.12 0.332 0 15 2 0 0 0 (0.0%) (88.2%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.17 1.35 0.606 0 12 4 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (70.6%) (23.5%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.30 1.59 0.795 0 10 4 3 0 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (58.8%) (23.5%) (17.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.30 1.41 0.507 0 10 7 0 0 0 (0.0%) (58.8%) (41.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 17 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L COM 375 P3677 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.75 1.94 0.998 1 7 4 4 1 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (5.9%) (41.2%) (23.5%) (23.5%) (5.9%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.67 2.06 1.298 0 7 6 2 0 2 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (41.2%) (35.3%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (11.8%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.70 2.06 1.197 0 7 5 3 1 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (41.2%) (29.4%) (17.6%) (5.9%) (5.9%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.96 3.06 0.659 0 0 2 13 1 1 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (11.8%) (76.5%) (5.9%) (5.9%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.67 1.82 0.809 0 7 6 4 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (41.2%) (35.3%) (23.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.12 1.35 0.702 0 13 2 2 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (76.5%) (11.8%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.23 3.35 0.493 0 0 0 11 6 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (64.7%) (35.3%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.07 2.12 0.781 0 4 7 6 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (23.5%) (41.2%) (35.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.67 1.94 1.029 0 7 6 2 2 0 (0.0%) (41.2%) (35.3%) (11.8%) (11.8%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 0.94 1.00 0.000 8 9 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (47.1%) (52.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.07 1.25 0.707 9 7 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (52.9%) (41.2%) (0.0%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.30 1.50 0.756 9 5 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (52.9%) (29.4%) (11.8%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.07 1.13 0.354 9 7 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (52.9%) (41.2%) (5.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 17 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L COM 375 P3677 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.30 1.63 1.061 9 5 2 0 1 0 (52.9%) (29.4%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (5.9%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.30 1.63 0.916 9 5 1 2 0 0 (52.9%) (29.4%) (5.9%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.30 1.63 0.916 9 5 1 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (52.9%) (29.4%) (5.9%) (11.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 17 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 17 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 17 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 17 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 17 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 17 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 17 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 17 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 26 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.26 1.38 0.571 0 17 8 1 0 0 (0.0%) (65.4%) (30.8%) (3.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.42 1.72 0.980 1 13 8 3 0 1 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (3.8%) (50.0%) (30.8%) (11.5%) (0.0%) (3.8%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.10 1.17 0.381 2 20 4 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (7.7%) (76.9%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.50 1.64 0.700 1 12 10 3 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (3.8%) (46.2%) (38.5%) (11.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.22 1.31 0.471 0 18 8 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (69.2%) (30.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.37 1.62 0.804 0 15 6 5 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (57.7%) (23.1%) (19.2%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.50 1.62 0.697 0 13 10 3 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (50.0%) (38.5%) (11.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.15 1.23 0.430 0 20 6 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (76.9%) (23.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.13 1.24 0.436 1 19 6 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (3.8%) (73.1%) (23.1%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.09 1.15 0.368 0 22 4 0 0 0 (0.0%) (84.6%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.18 1.38 0.752 0 19 5 1 1 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (73.1%) (19.2%) (3.8%) (3.8%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.37 1.69 1.011 0 15 6 4 0 1

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (57.7%) (23.1%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (3.8%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.31 1.38 0.496 0 16 10 0 0 0 (0.0%) (61.5%) (38.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 26 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.83 2.08 1.115 1 10 6 7 1 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (3.8%) (38.5%) (23.1%) (26.9%) (3.8%) (3.8%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.70 1.96 1.183 0 11 10 2 1 2 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (42.3%) (38.5%) (7.7%) (3.8%) (7.7%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.75 2.00 1.131 0 11 8 4 2 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (42.3%) (30.8%) (15.4%) (7.7%) (3.8%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.05 3.15 0.675 0 0 2 20 2 2 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (7.7%) (76.9%) (7.7%) (7.7%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.88 1.96 0.908 2 9 8 6 1 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (7.7%) (34.6%) (30.8%) (23.1%) (3.8%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.17 1.44 0.768 1 18 3 4 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (3.8%) (69.2%) (11.5%) (15.4%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.26 3.38 0.571 0 0 0 17 8 1 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (65.4%) (30.8%) (3.8%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.05 2.04 0.774 0 7 11 8 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (26.9%) (42.3%) (30.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.68 1.81 0.895 0 11 11 2 2 0 (0.0%) (42.3%) (42.3%) (7.7%) (7.7%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.00 1.00 0.000 16 10 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (61.5%) (38.5%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.07 1.25 0.707 18 7 0 1 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (69.2%) (26.9%) (0.0%) (3.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.30 1.50 0.756 18 5 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (69.2%) (19.2%) (7.7%) (3.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.07 1.13 0.354 18 7 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (69.2%) (26.9%) (3.8%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 26 STUDENTS RESPONDED SHEDLETSKY L ALL CLASSES QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.30 1.63 1.061 18 5 2 0 1 0 (69.2%) (19.2%) (7.7%) (0.0%) (3.8%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.30 1.63 0.916 18 5 1 2 0 0 (69.2%) (19.2%) (3.8%) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.30 1.63 0.916 18 5 1 2 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (69.2%) (19.2%) (3.8%) (7.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 26 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 26 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 26 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 26 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 26 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 26 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 26 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 26 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 7 STUDENTS RESPONDED SLACK K COM 130 B2530 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.25 1.43 0.535 0 4 3 0 0 0 (0.0%) (57.1%) (42.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.10 1.29 0.488 0 5 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (71.4%) (28.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 0.93 1.00 0.000 0 7 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.10 1.29 0.488 0 5 2 0 0 0 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (0.0%) (71.4%) (28.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.00 1.14 0.378 0 6 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 0.93 1.00 0.000 0 7 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.25 1.43 0.535 0 4 3 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (0.0%) (57.1%) (42.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 0.93 1.00 0.000 0 7 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 0.93 1.00 0.000 0 7 0 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.00 1.14 0.378 0 6 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.00 1.29 0.756 0 6 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (0.0%) (85.7%) (0.0%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.00 1.43 1.134 0 6 0 0 1 0

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (0.0%) (85.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (14.3%) (0.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.00 1.14 0.378 0 6 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 7 STUDENTS RESPONDED SLACK K COM 130 B2530 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 0.93 1.00 0.000 0 7 0 0 0 0 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.00 1.14 0.378 0 6 1 0 0 0 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.00 1.29 0.756 0 6 0 1 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (85.7%) (0.0%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 2.83 2.86 0.378 0 0 1 6 0 0 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (0.0%) (0.0%) (14.3%) (85.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 1.25 1.43 0.535 0 4 3 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (57.1%) (42.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 0.93 1.00 0.000 0 7 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 2.83 2.86 0.378 0 0 1 6 0 0 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (0.0%) (0.0%) (14.3%) (85.7%) (0.0%) (0.0%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 1.50 2.29 1.496 0 3 1 2 0 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (42.9%) (14.3%) (28.6%) (0.0%) (14.3%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.00 1.14 0.378 0 6 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.25 1.57 0.787 0 4 2 1 0 0 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (0.0%) (57.1%) (28.6%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 0.93 1.00 0.000 0 7 0 0 0 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.10 1.57 1.134 0 5 1 0 1 0 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (0.0%) (71.4%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (14.3%) (0.0%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 0.93 1.00 0.000 0 7 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (0.0%) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 7 STUDENTS RESPONDED SLACK K COM 130 B2530 QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.00 1.14 0.378 0 6 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.00 1.14 0.378 0 6 1 0 0 0 (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.00 1.14 0.378 0 6 1 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (0.0%) (85.7%) (14.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? N/A N/A N/A 7 0 0 0 0 0 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 7 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) N/A N/A N/A 7 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? N/A N/A N/A 7 0 0 0 0 0 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 7 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 7 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 7 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 7 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 582 STUDENTS RESPONDED ENTIRE DEPT QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE 1. HOW PREPARED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR CLASS? 1-WELL PREPARED 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED (1-WELL PREPARED; 5-OFTEN UNPREPARED) 1.18 1.38 0.745 5 425 107 29 11 5 (0.9%) (73.0%) (18.4%) (5.0%) (1.9%) (0.9%) 2. HOW CLEARLY WERE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR COURSE PRESENTED? 1.29 1.55 0.856 8 364 133 55 16 6 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) (1.4%) (62.5%) (22.9%) (9.5%) (2.7%) (1.0%) 3. HOW ENTHUSIASTIC WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABOUT 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE SUBJECT? 1.14 1.33 0.708 13 443 85 26 12 3 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.2%) (76.1%) (14.6%) (4.5%) (2.1%) (0.5%) 4. HOW CLEARLY DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT 1-VERY CLEAR 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR IDEAS AND THEORIES? 1.39 1.61 0.828 13 320 177 52 15 5 (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-OFTEN UNCLEAR) (2.2%) (55.0%) (30.4%) (8.9%) (2.6%) (0.9%) 5. HOW MUCH WERE STUDENTS ENCOURAGED TO THINK 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE FOR THEMSELVES? 1.30 1.52 0.776 14 353 155 46 10 4 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.4%) (60.7%) (26.6%) (7.9%) (1.7%) (0.7%) 6. HOW CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR THE 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED QUALITY OF HIS OR HER TEACHING? 1.33 1.59 0.868 10 345 144 62 14 7 (1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (1.7%) (59.3%) (24.7%) (10.7%) (2.4%) (1.2%) 7. HOW ORDERLY AND LOGICAL WERE THE 1-VERY MUCH 5-NOT AT ALL INSTRUCTORS PRESENTATIONS OF MATERIAL? 1.32 1.54 0.786 11 349 150 57 14 1 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-NOT AT ALL) (1.9%) (60.0%) (25.8%) (9.8%) (2.4%) (0.2%) 8. HOW OPEN WAS THE INSTRUCTOR TO OTHER 1-VERY OPEN 5-OFTEN CLOSED VIEWPOINTS? 1.22 1.43 0.742 11 394 121 45 8 3 (1-VERY OPEN; 5-OFTEN CLOSED) (1.9%) (67.7%) (20.8%) (7.7%) (1.4%) (0.5%) 9. DID THE INSTRUCTOR SHOW RESPECT FOR THE 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY QUESTIONS AND OPINIONS OF STUDENTS? 1.14 1.33 0.688 14 442 79 36 10 1 (1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (2.4%) (75.9%) (13.6%) (6.2%) (1.7%) (0.2%)10. HOW OFTEN WERE EXAMPLES USED IN CLASS? 1-VERY OFTEN 5-RARELY (1-VERY OFTEN; 5-RARELY) 1.15 1.31 0.649 8 441 96 32 1 4 (1.4%) (75.8%) (16.5%) (5.5%) (0.2%) (0.7%)11. DID THE INSTRUCTOR INSPIRE CONFIDENCE IN 1-VERY MUCH 5-LITTLE HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT? 1.13 1.28 0.629 11 455 81 28 5 2 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-LITTLE) (1.9%) (78.2%) (13.9%) (4.8%) (0.9%) (0.3%)12. HOW GENUINELY CONCERNED WAS THE INSTRUCTOR 1-VERY CONCERNED 5-UNCONCERNED WITH STUDENTS PROGRESS? 1.37 1.61 0.847 10 328 161 65 12 6

(1-VERY CONCERNED; 5-UNCONCERNED) (1.7%) (56.4%) (27.7%) (11.2%) (2.1%) (1.0%)13. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR? 1-EXCELLENT 5-BELOW AVERAGE (1-EXCELLENT; 5-BELOW AVERAGE) 1.23 1.44 0.740 10 391 123 47 9 2 (1.7%) (67.2%) (21.1%) (8.1%) (1.5%) (0.3%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 582 STUDENTS RESPONDED ENTIRE DEPT QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE14. WERE CLASS MEETINGS PROFITABLE AND WORTH 1-ALWAYS 5-NOT USUALLY ATTENDING? 1.43 1.73 0.956 10 309 145 88 21 9 (1-ALWAYS; 5-NOT USUALLY) (1.7%) (53.1%) (24.9%) (15.1%) (3.6%) (1.5%)15. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF 1-VERY INTERESTING 5-UNINTERESTING THIS COURSE? 1.41 1.69 0.923 9 315 160 71 17 10 (1-VERY INTERESTING; 5-UNINTERESTING) (1.5%) (54.1%) (27.5%) (12.2%) (2.9%) (1.7%)16. DID YOU DEVELOP SIGNIFICANT SKILLS IN FIELD 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE AS A RESULT OF TAKING COURSE? 1.64 1.87 1.001 13 258 183 82 35 11 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.2%) (44.3%) (31.4%) (14.1%) (6.0%) (1.9%)17. HOW WAS THE PACE AT WHICH THE MATERIAL IN 1-TOO SLOW 5-TOO FAST THE COURSE WAS COVERED? 3.07 3.13 0.524 14 3 24 451 77 13 (1-TOO SLOW; 5-TOO FAST) (2.4%) (0.5%) (4.1%) (77.5%) (13.2%) (2.2%)18. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE PRIMARY 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR TEXTBOOK(S)? 2.02 2.15 1.097 38 192 154 146 28 24 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (6.5%) (33.0%) (26.5%) (25.1%) (4.8%) (4.1%)19. WERE STUDENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY CONCEPTS TO 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING? 1.37 1.62 0.853 15 325 158 61 20 3 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.6%) (55.8%) (27.1%) (10.5%) (3.4%) (0.5%)20. HOW DID THE WORK LOAD FOR THIS COURSE 1-LIGHTER 5-MUCH HEAVIER COMPARE TO OTHERS OF EQUAL CREDIT? 3.11 3.16 0.756 14 16 49 359 117 27 (1-LIGHTER; 5-MUCH HEAVIER) (2.4%) (2.7%) (8.4%) (61.7%) (20.1%) (4.6%)21. HOW MUCH INTELLECTUAL DISCIPLINE WAS 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE REQUIRED IN THIS COURSE? 2.10 2.15 0.921 12 155 217 164 26 8 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (2.1%) (26.6%) (37.3%) (28.2%) (4.5%) (1.4%)22. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THIS COURSE? 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) 1.45 1.69 0.884 10 301 178 69 17 7 (1.7%) (51.7%) (30.6%) (11.9%) (2.9%) (1.2%)23. HOW PROMPTLY WERE ASSIGNMENTS AND TESTS 1-VERY PROMPT 5-TOO SLOW RETURNED? 1.39 1.70 0.919 127 256 100 84 10 5 (1-VERY PROMPT; 5-TOO SLOW) (21.8%) (44.0%) (17.2%) (14.4%) (1.7%) (0.9%)24. COULD TESTS BE COMPLETED IN THE ALLOTTED 1-ALWAYS 5-RARELY TIME? 1.11 1.29 0.663 153 353 30 44 2 0

(1-ALWAYS; 5-RARELY) (26.3%) (60.7%) (5.2%) (7.6%) (0.3%) (0.0%)25. DID INSTRUCTOR LET YOU KNOW WHAT HE OR SHE 1-VERY CLEARLY 5-NOT CLEAR EXPECTED ON TESTS + ASSIGNMENTS? 1.34 1.67 0.955 137 265 96 57 22 5 (1-VERY CLEARLY; 5-NOT CLEAR) (23.5%) (45.5%) (16.5%) (9.8%) (3.8%) (0.9%)26. DID EXAMS REFLECT THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE THE COURSE? 1.39 1.70 0.918 150 243 98 73 15 3 (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) (25.8%) (41.8%) (16.8%) (12.5%) (2.6%) (0.5%) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE STUDENT INPUT FOR TEACHING FACULTY EVALUATIONS - COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES - FALL 2007 582 STUDENTS RESPONDED ENTIRE DEPT QUESTION MEDIAN MEAN STD. NO 1 2 3 4 5 DEV. RESPONSE27. HOW CLEAR WERE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 1-VERY CLEAR 5-UNCLEAR (1-VERY CLEAR; 5-UNCLEAR) 1.61 1.95 1.081 157 201 96 87 32 9 (27.0%) (34.5%) (16.5%) (14.9%) (5.5%) (1.5%)28. HOW FAIR WERE THE GRADING PROCEDURES? 1-COMPLETELY 5-UNFAIR (1-COMPLETELY; 5-UNFAIR) 1.38 1.67 0.903 135 254 112 60 18 3 (23.2%) (43.6%) (19.2%) (10.3%) (3.1%) (0.5%)29. OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EXAMINATION 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR PROCEDURE? 1.57 1.86 0.994 152 207 107 93 15 8 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (26.1%) (35.6%) (18.4%) (16.0%) (2.6%) (1.4%)30. HOW WELL WERE THE LABS INTEGRATED WITH THE 1-VERY WELL 5-NOT AT ALL LECTURES? 1.07 1.59 1.372 565 14 0 1 0 2 (1-VERY WELL; 5-NOT AT ALL) (97.1%) (2.4%) (0.0%) (0.2%) (0.0%) (0.3%)31. DID THE LABS PROVIDE A LEARNING EXPERIENCE? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.12 1.44 1.094 566 13 1 1 0 1 (97.3%) (2.2%) (0.2%) (0.2%) (0.0%) (0.2%)32. HOW HELPFUL WAS THE LAB INSTRUCTOR? 1-VERY MUCH 5-VERY LITTLE (1-VERY MUCH; 5-VERY LITTLE) 1.07 1.38 1.088 566 14 0 1 0 1 (97.3%) (2.4%) (0.0%) (0.2%) (0.0%) (0.2%)33. WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL RATING OF THE 1-EXCELLENT 5-POOR LABORATORIES? 1.07 1.38 1.088 566 14 0 1 0 1 (1-EXCELLENT; 5-POOR) (97.3%) (2.4%) (0.0%) (0.2%) (0.0%) (0.2%)34. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 1 N/A N/A N/A 582 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)35. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 2 N/A N/A N/A 582 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)36. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 3 N/A N/A N/A 582 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)37. ADDITIONAL QUESTION 4 N/A N/A N/A 582 0 0 0 0 0 (100.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%)

QUESTION 1 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.00 17PANICI D 1.15 80EBBEN M 1.20 10KILLMEIER M 1.27 56KAMINSKI K 1.28 25KIVATISKY R 1.35 52LOCKHART J 1.36 11SHEDLETSKY L 1.38 26ANDERSON E 1.40 118PIERSON D 1.42 53SLACK K 1.43 7LOCKRIDGE R 1.43 28CHAIMOWITZ D 1.50 54GILBERT D 1.97 40QUESTION 2 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.06 16EBBEN M 1.20 10LOCKHART J 1.27 11SLACK K 1.29 7PANICI D 1.34 80LOCKRIDGE R 1.39 28ANDERSON E 1.41 118KIVATISKY R 1.46 52KAMINSKI K 1.52 25CHAIMOWITZ D 1.59 54PIERSON D 1.62 53KILLMEIER M 1.69 55SHEDLETSKY L 1.72 25GILBERT D 2.57 40QUESTION 3 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.00 16SLACK K 1.00 7KAMINSKI K 1.00 25EBBEN M 1.10 10

KIVATISKY R 1.14 50ANDERSON E 1.15 116LOCKRIDGE R 1.15 27SHEDLETSKY L 1.17 24LOCKHART J 1.18 11PANICI D 1.22 80CHAIMOWITZ D 1.24 54KILLMEIER M 1.73 56GILBERT D 1.80 40PIERSON D 1.87 53QUESTION 4 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.06 17SLACK K 1.29 7EBBEN M 1.30 10KAMINSKI K 1.36 25ANDERSON E 1.42 117LOCKHART J 1.45 11PANICI D 1.49 79LOCKRIDGE R 1.56 27KIVATISKY R 1.59 51SHEDLETSKY L 1.64 25CHAIMOWITZ D 1.72 53PIERSON D 1.73 52KILLMEIER M 1.85 55GILBERT D 2.35 40QUESTION 5 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.14 7KAMINSKI K 1.16 25KIVATISKY R 1.27 52SHEDLETSKY L 1.31 26LOCKRIDGE R 1.33 27EBBEN M 1.38 8PANICI D 1.43 79CHAIMOWITZ D 1.43 53IVES N 1.47 17GILBERT D 1.47 40ANDERSON E 1.60 116LOCKHART J 1.73 11PIERSON D 1.79 52

KILLMEIER M 1.93 55QUESTION 6 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.00 7IVES N 1.12 17KAMINSKI K 1.20 25EBBEN M 1.30 10KIVATISKY R 1.35 51LOCKHART J 1.36 11LOCKRIDGE R 1.41 27PANICI D 1.45 80ANDERSON E 1.56 118SHEDLETSKY L 1.62 26CHAIMOWITZ D 1.63 54PIERSON D 1.77 53KILLMEIER M 1.91 53GILBERT D 2.35 40QUESTION 7 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.06 17KAMINSKI K 1.20 25ANDERSON E 1.30 116PANICI D 1.35 80EBBEN M 1.40 10SLACK K 1.43 7LOCKHART J 1.55 11LOCKRIDGE R 1.57 28SHEDLETSKY L 1.62 26CHAIMOWITZ D 1.63 54PIERSON D 1.64 53KILLMEIER M 1.66 53KIVATISKY R 1.77 52GILBERT D 2.36 39QUESTION 8 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.00 17SLACK K 1.00 7KIVATISKY R 1.15 52KAMINSKI K 1.16 25SHEDLETSKY L 1.23 26

EBBEN M 1.30 10ANDERSON E 1.43 117LOCKRIDGE R 1.44 27LOCKHART J 1.45 11PANICI D 1.49 79PIERSON D 1.53 53CHAIMOWITZ D 1.55 51KILLMEIER M 1.59 56GILBERT D 1.77 40QUESTION 9 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.00 17SLACK K 1.00 7KIVATISKY R 1.06 52KAMINSKI K 1.08 25EBBEN M 1.10 10SHEDLETSKY L 1.24 25ANDERSON E 1.27 116LOCKRIDGE R 1.32 28LOCKHART J 1.36 11PIERSON D 1.37 52PANICI D 1.40 78CHAIMOWITZ D 1.49 53KILLMEIER M 1.51 55GILBERT D 1.64 39QUESTION 10 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

KAMINSKI K 1.04 25IVES N 1.06 17ANDERSON E 1.11 116SLACK K 1.14 7SHEDLETSKY L 1.15 26CHAIMOWITZ D 1.20 54LOCKRIDGE R 1.21 28PIERSON D 1.34 53PANICI D 1.34 80KIVATISKY R 1.37 52EBBEN M 1.40 10KILLMEIER M 1.55 56GILBERT D 1.85 40LOCKHART J 1.90 10

QUESTION 11 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.00 17KAMINSKI K 1.00 25ANDERSON E 1.10 116PANICI D 1.13 78KIVATISKY R 1.15 52EBBEN M 1.20 10SLACK K 1.29 7LOCKRIDGE R 1.36 28LOCKHART J 1.36 11SHEDLETSKY L 1.38 26CHAIMOWITZ D 1.43 53KILLMEIER M 1.43 56GILBERT D 1.60 40PIERSON D 1.60 52QUESTION 12 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.06 16EBBEN M 1.20 10KAMINSKI K 1.21 24LOCKRIDGE R 1.30 27KIVATISKY R 1.33 52SLACK K 1.43 7ANDERSON E 1.49 117LOCKHART J 1.55 11PANICI D 1.60 80SHEDLETSKY L 1.69 26CHAIMOWITZ D 1.70 54PIERSON D 1.79 52KILLMEIER M 1.98 56GILBERT D 2.30 40QUESTION 13 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.00 17KAMINSKI K 1.08 25EBBEN M 1.10 10SLACK K 1.14 7KIVATISKY R 1.21 52ANDERSON E 1.26 114

LOCKHART J 1.27 11PANICI D 1.35 80SHEDLETSKY L 1.38 26LOCKRIDGE R 1.39 28CHAIMOWITZ D 1.63 54KILLMEIER M 1.71 56PIERSON D 1.81 53GILBERT D 1.97 39QUESTION 14 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.00 7IVES N 1.06 17KAMINSKI K 1.32 25LOCKHART J 1.36 11LOCKRIDGE R 1.46 28ANDERSON E 1.56 117EBBEN M 1.56 9PANICI D 1.57 79KIVATISKY R 1.69 52CHAIMOWITZ D 1.85 54SHEDLETSKY L 2.08 25KILLMEIER M 2.09 56GILBERT D 2.10 40PIERSON D 2.23 52QUESTION 15 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.06 17SLACK K 1.14 7KAMINSKI K 1.36 25CHAIMOWITZ D 1.37 54EBBEN M 1.40 10ANDERSON E 1.53 117LOCKRIDGE R 1.54 28LOCKHART J 1.73 11PANICI D 1.76 78KIVATISKY R 1.81 52PIERSON D 1.88 52SHEDLETSKY L 1.96 26KILLMEIER M 2.04 56GILBERT D 2.07 40QUESTION 16

NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.06 17SLACK K 1.29 7EBBEN M 1.44 9LOCKRIDGE R 1.46 28KAMINSKI K 1.64 25LOCKHART J 1.73 11PANICI D 1.77 78ANDERSON E 1.83 116KIVATISKY R 1.83 52SHEDLETSKY L 2.00 26PIERSON D 2.02 52CHAIMOWITZ D 2.08 53GILBERT D 2.13 40KILLMEIER M 2.31 55QUESTION 17 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 2.86 7CHAIMOWITZ D 2.91 54PIERSON D 3.00 52EBBEN M 3.00 9LOCKRIDGE R 3.04 27KAMINSKI K 3.08 25KILLMEIER M 3.11 54IVES N 3.12 17SHEDLETSKY L 3.15 26PANICI D 3.18 78KIVATISKY R 3.19 52ANDERSON E 3.22 116GILBERT D 3.25 40LOCKHART J 3.36 11QUESTION 18 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.43 7GILBERT D 1.82 39KAMINSKI K 1.82 17LOCKRIDGE R 1.89 28ANDERSON E 1.93 116SHEDLETSKY L 1.96 24EBBEN M 2.00 10

KIVATISKY R 2.10 51PANICI D 2.20 76LOCKHART J 2.30 10IVES N 2.33 12CHAIMOWITZ D 2.39 46PIERSON D 2.46 52KILLMEIER M 2.70 56QUESTION 19 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.00 7IVES N 1.18 17KAMINSKI K 1.40 25LOCKRIDGE R 1.43 28EBBEN M 1.44 9SHEDLETSKY L 1.44 25KIVATISKY R 1.46 52PANICI D 1.51 79ANDERSON E 1.62 116PIERSON D 1.65 51CHAIMOWITZ D 1.74 53GILBERT D 1.88 40LOCKHART J 2.00 11KILLMEIER M 2.07 54QUESTION 20 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

CHAIMOWITZ D 2.69 54SLACK K 2.86 7ANDERSON E 2.90 113LOCKHART J 2.91 11KAMINSKI K 3.04 25IVES N 3.06 17EBBEN M 3.11 9PIERSON D 3.16 51KILLMEIER M 3.16 56PANICI D 3.30 79KIVATISKY R 3.33 52SHEDLETSKY L 3.38 26LOCKRIDGE R 3.43 28GILBERT D 3.92 40QUESTION 21 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

LOCKRIDGE R 1.71 28GILBERT D 1.85 40KIVATISKY R 1.88 52IVES N 1.88 17KAMINSKI K 1.96 25PANICI D 1.99 78SHEDLETSKY L 2.04 26EBBEN M 2.11 9KILLMEIER M 2.25 56SLACK K 2.29 7PIERSON D 2.29 52ANDERSON E 2.31 115LOCKHART J 2.36 11CHAIMOWITZ D 2.67 54QUESTION 22 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

IVES N 1.12 17SLACK K 1.14 7EBBEN M 1.20 10KAMINSKI K 1.36 25LOCKRIDGE R 1.39 28LOCKHART J 1.55 11PANICI D 1.58 78ANDERSON E 1.63 116KIVATISKY R 1.65 52CHAIMOWITZ D 1.67 54SHEDLETSKY L 1.81 26PIERSON D 1.92 52KILLMEIER M 2.09 56GILBERT D 2.15 40QUESTION 23 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SHEDLETSKY L 1.00 10EBBEN M 1.20 10PIERSON D 1.23 43KAMINSKI K 1.24 17LOCKHART J 1.50 6PANICI D 1.53 66SLACK K 1.57 7LOCKRIDGE R 1.63 24

CHAIMOWITZ D 1.67 43IVES N 1.67 6KIVATISKY R 1.69 29KILLMEIER M 1.73 49ANDERSON E 1.97 116GILBERT D 2.52 29QUESTION 24 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.00 7ANDERSON E 1.13 116PANICI D 1.17 66PIERSON D 1.19 42EBBEN M 1.20 10KAMINSKI K 1.21 14SHEDLETSKY L 1.25 8CHAIMOWITZ D 1.26 42LOCKRIDGE R 1.27 22KILLMEIER M 1.38 47IVES N 1.50 6KIVATISKY R 1.62 21GILBERT D 2.09 23LOCKHART J 2.40 5QUESTION 25 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

EBBEN M 1.30 10KAMINSKI K 1.35 17PIERSON D 1.48 42SHEDLETSKY L 1.50 8IVES N 1.50 6PANICI D 1.53 66SLACK K 1.57 7LOCKRIDGE R 1.58 24ANDERSON E 1.59 112LOCKHART J 1.67 6KIVATISKY R 1.70 27KILLMEIER M 1.73 49CHAIMOWITZ D 1.83 42GILBERT D 2.62 29QUESTION 26 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.00 7SHEDLETSKY L 1.13 8LOCKRIDGE R 1.36 22PANICI D 1.46 65PIERSON D 1.55 42KAMINSKI K 1.56 16EBBEN M 1.60 10ANDERSON E 1.73 116IVES N 1.80 5KIVATISKY R 1.80 20LOCKHART J 1.80 5KILLMEIER M 1.94 47GILBERT D 2.00 26CHAIMOWITZ D 2.05 43QUESTION 27 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.14 7EBBEN M 1.30 10LOCKRIDGE R 1.36 22KAMINSKI K 1.50 16PIERSON D 1.62 42SHEDLETSKY L 1.63 8CHAIMOWITZ D 1.69 42LOCKHART J 1.80 5IVES N 1.80 5KIVATISKY R 1.95 20PANICI D 2.05 66ANDERSON E 2.23 115KILLMEIER M 2.24 46GILBERT D 2.29 21QUESTION 28 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.14 7EBBEN M 1.20 10LOCKRIDGE R 1.29 24KAMINSKI K 1.35 17PANICI D 1.41 66PIERSON D 1.55 42IVES N 1.60 5CHAIMOWITZ D 1.63 43SHEDLETSKY L 1.63 8

KIVATISKY R 1.77 26ANDERSON E 1.79 116LOCKHART J 1.83 6KILLMEIER M 1.90 49GILBERT D 2.29 28QUESTION 29 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

SLACK K 1.14 7EBBEN M 1.20 10LOCKRIDGE R 1.36 22IVES N 1.40 5KAMINSKI K 1.44 16SHEDLETSKY L 1.63 8LOCKHART J 1.80 5PIERSON D 1.81 42KIVATISKY R 1.83 23PANICI D 1.83 65ANDERSON E 1.97 114CHAIMOWITZ D 2.02 43KILLMEIER M 2.04 46GILBERT D 2.29 24QUESTION 30 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

KIVATISKY R N/A 0SHEDLETSKY L N/A 0SLACK K N/A 0EBBEN M N/A 0KAMINSKI K N/A 0CHAIMOWITZ D N/A 0GILBERT D N/A 0KILLMEIER M N/A 0PIERSON D 1.00 2LOCKHART J 1.00 1IVES N 1.00 9PANICI D 1.00 1ANDERSON E 3.00 2LOCKRIDGE R 4.00 2QUESTION 31 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

KIVATISKY R N/A 0

SHEDLETSKY L N/A 0SLACK K N/A 0EBBEN M N/A 0KAMINSKI K N/A 0CHAIMOWITZ D N/A 0GILBERT D N/A 0KILLMEIER M N/A 0ANDERSON E 1.00 1LOCKHART J 1.00 1PIERSON D 1.00 2IVES N 1.00 9PANICI D 2.00 1LOCKRIDGE R 4.00 2QUESTION 32 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

KIVATISKY R N/A 0SHEDLETSKY L N/A 0SLACK K N/A 0EBBEN M N/A 0KAMINSKI K N/A 0CHAIMOWITZ D N/A 0GILBERT D N/A 0KILLMEIER M N/A 0ANDERSON E 1.00 1LOCKHART J 1.00 1PIERSON D 1.00 2IVES N 1.00 9PANICI D 1.00 1LOCKRIDGE R 4.00 2QUESTION 33 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

KIVATISKY R N/A 0SHEDLETSKY L N/A 0SLACK K N/A 0EBBEN M N/A 0KAMINSKI K N/A 0CHAIMOWITZ D N/A 0GILBERT D N/A 0KILLMEIER M N/A 0ANDERSON E 1.00 1LOCKHART J 1.00 1

PIERSON D 1.00 2IVES N 1.00 9PANICI D 1.00 1LOCKRIDGE R 4.00 2QUESTION 34 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS

LOCKHART J N/A 0ANDERSON E N/A 0SHEDLETSKY L N/A 0EBBEN M N/A 0PANICI D N/A 0CHAIMOWITZ D N/A 0KIVATISKY R N/A 0GILBERT D N/A 0LOCKRIDGE R N/A 0IVES N N/A 0PIERSON D N/A 0KAMINSKI K N/A 0SLACK K N/A 0KILLMEIER M N/A 0QUESTION 35 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS


LOCKHART J N/A 0ANDERSON E N/A 0

SHEDLETSKY L N/A 0EBBEN M N/A 0PANICI D N/A 0CHAIMOWITZ D N/A 0KIVATISKY R N/A 0GILBERT D N/A 0LOCKRIDGE R N/A 0IVES N N/A 0PIERSON D N/A 0KAMINSKI K N/A 0SLACK K N/A 0KILLMEIER M N/A 0QUESTION 37 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS


LOCKHART J N/A 0ANDERSON E N/A 0SHEDLETSKY L N/A 0EBBEN M N/A 0PANICI D N/A 0CHAIMOWITZ D N/A 0KIVATISKY R N/A 0GILBERT D N/A 0LOCKRIDGE R N/A 0IVES N N/A 0PIERSON D N/A 0

KAMINSKI K N/A 0SLACK K N/A 0KILLMEIER M N/A 0QUESTION 39 NAME MEAN # STUDENTS


LOCKHART J N/A 0ANDERSON E N/A 0SHEDLETSKY L N/A 0EBBEN M N/A 0PANICI D N/A 0CHAIMOWITZ D N/A 0KIVATISKY R N/A 0GILBERT D N/A 0LOCKRIDGE R N/A 0IVES N N/A 0PIERSON D N/A 0KAMINSKI K N/A 0SLACK K N/A 0KILLMEIER M N/A 001/22/2008 JOB ACCOUNTING SUMMARY 16:07:31

JOBNAME: USMEVALSEXECPATH: PLIOPT,LNKEDT,PLIOPT,LNKEDT

JOBSTART: 16:07:28JOBSTOP: 16:07:31DURATION: 00:00:03

----------VSE USAGE SUMMARY---------- --------ADABAS COMMAND SUMMARY-------

RESOURCE TYPE COUNT CRUS COMMAND TYPE COUNT CRUS

CPU SECOND ......... 00000.61 0000.12 FIND ............... 00000000 0000.00DISK SIO ........... 00002933 0000.58 READ ............... 00000000 0000.00TAPE SIO ........... 00000000 0000.00 UPDATE ............. 00000000 0000.00PRT SIO ............ 00014227 0000.94 DELETE ............. 00000000 0000.00PCH SIO ............ 00000000 0000.00 STORE .............. 00000000 0000.00RDR SIO ............ 00001266 0000.08 END TRANSACTION..... 00000000 0000.00OTH SIO ............ 00000002 0000.00 SPECIAL PURPOSE .... 00000000 0000.00

VSE TOTAL .......... 0001.72 ADABAS TOTAL ....... 00000000 0000.00

TOTAL CRUS ........ 00001.72

EOJ USMEVALS DATE 01/22/2008,16:07:31,FORM G0 , MAX.R/C 0004, CRU 00001.72

job usmevals axa060 evals usmscan date … of academic assess… · how clearly were the objectives...

Documents