jica presentation roadmap for transport infrastructure development

8/13/2019 JICA Presentation Roadmap for Transport Infrastructure Development

1/51

Roadmap for Transport Infrastructure Developmentfor Metro Manila and Its Surrounding Areas(Region III and Region IV-A)

Summary of the Outputs

Technical Assistance from the JapanInternational Cooperation Agency (JICA)

12 September 2013


2/51

Contents

2

Study Scope and Process Regional Development Issues

Regional Development Direction

Urban Issues of Metro Manila

Mega Manila Transport Dream Plan

Short-term Investment Program (2014-2016)

Draft Final Report


3/51

Study scope and process

Objectives

To formulate Transportation Infrastructure

Roadmap for sustainable development of

Metro Manila region

Dream Plan (2030) and Short-term (2014-

2016)

Study Period

MarchAugust 2013 Meeting and Discussions

1st Inter-agency Meeting (5 April)

NEDA Infra Staff Meeting (21 May)

2ndInter-agency Meeting (23 May)

Meeting with DPWH Secretary (10 June)

Meeting with DOTC Secretary (13 June) Meeting with MMDA Chairman (13 June)

NEDA Infra Staff Meeting (24 June)

Meeting with Donors (July 5)

INFRACOM Meeting (30 July)

Meeting with DOTC Secretary (7 August)

Meeting with DPWH Secretary (15 August) Meeting with DOTC Secretary (6 September) 3

100km

50km

MetroManila

Region III

Region IV-A

AuroraNueva Ecija

Tarlac

Pampanga

Bulacan

Rizal

CaviteLaguna

Batangas

GCR: Metro Manila, Region III, Region IV-A

Mega Manila: Metro Manila, Bulacan, Rizal, Laguna, Cavite

Metro Manila : 17 cities/municipality


4/51

Regional Development Issues


5/51

Study area profile

5

Metro Manila shares 35.5% of countrys GRDP

Greater Capital Region (GCR) shares 62.0% of countrys GRDP

Population (no. & growth rate) GRDP (value & growth rate) GRDP/capita (value & growth rate)

Metro

ManilaR-III R-IV-A Visayas Mindanao Metro

ManilaR-III R-IV-A Visayas Mindanao Metro

ManilaR-III R-IV-A Visayas Mindanao

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

Legend


6/51

Regional development issues

6

Region III & IV-A

Developments are in progressinselected locations (Clark, Subic, Tarlac,others) with uncoordinated andunsynchronized pattern of urban growth.

Economic development potentials areuntapped (agro-based, manufacturing,tourism)

High logistics costs along SCMB (Subic-Clark-MManila-Batangas) corridor wheremore than 80% of total national cargothroughput concentrate. (PhilippineDevelopment Plan 2011 - 2016)

Metro Manila

Concentration of the activities and wealthin Metro Manila continues while the benefitsdo not spillover sufficiently to outer regions.

Carrying capacity of Metro Manila isbeing reached; traffic congestions worsen,pollutions increase, hazard risk increase,population density reaches very high level;sustainable growth threatened.

Low income groups suffer more seriously.

Metro Manilas problems can no longer be solved within MetroManila.

BRLC provinces must be prepared to avoid negative impact ofMetro Manilas urbanization.

BRLC and Region III and Region IV must work out effective ways

to maximize the impacts of Metro Manila and mitigate MetroManilas problems.


7/51

Regional Development Direction


8/51

Vision and key interventions

8

Gate to wellspring of hopePlace for livable communities

Space for dynamic business centers

GCR as tri-engine of growth with GPS for the country

Key interventions

Integrated transport and urban and rural mobility

Disaster preparedness and resilience

Environment and high-quality public space

Affordable housing policy and delivery Land use management and development control


9/51

Key development strategies

Promote planned and guided expansion of

urban areas toward adjoining provinces(specially Bulacan and Cavite) in integration withpublic transport services

Provide affordable housing and improvedliving environment for low income groups,those residing in high hazard risk areas andslums/squatter areas

Retrofit existing urban areas in integrationwith public transport (Transit OrientedDevelopment)

Expand and improve multi-modal publictransport network and services

Strengthen traffic and demand management

including control of private car use

Accelerate economic growth through expansion

of manufacturing, BPO, services and tourism

Protect prime agricultural areas for foodsecurity

Avoidurban sprawl , especially in hazard riskareas

Promote growth of regional centers

Strengthen connectivity between the regionand Metro Manila, and among growth centers inthe region

Improve public transport services andlogistics in the region

Regional Level Metro Manila Level

9

Changing Socio-economic Environment

Growing economy and affluence Increasing demand for better living environment and QOL

Changing behavior of the people


10/51

Changes in spatial structure of Greater Capital Region(GCR)

Today Future

Metropolis

Provincial Capital

Urban center

City population

10

Batangas

Olongapo

Balanga

Tarlac

Mabalacat

San Fernando

Baler

Palayan

Malolos

Lucena

Sta Cruz

San Pabro

Gen. Trias

Dasmarinas

ImusBacoor

Calamba

Cabuyao

Sta. Rosa

Antipolo

San Jose Del Monte

Sta. Maria

Balanga

San Fernando

Baler

Palayan

Cabanatuan

Gapan

Malolos

San PabloTanauan

Tagaytay

Dasmarinas

Bacoor

Calamba

Sta. Rosa

Antipolo

San Jose Del MonteMeycauayan

Imus

Cabuyao

Baliuag

25km

50km

100km

125km

150km

25km

50km

100km

125km

150km

Regional Center

Sub-regional Center

Urban CenterCity population

Sta Cruz

75km 75km

Development ofhierarchicalregionalcenters/clusters

Economic

development Agro-based

Manufacturing

Services, BPO

Tourism, others

ImprovedconnectivityBinan

San Pedro

Binangonan

CaintaTaytay

Rodriguez

San Mateo

Cabamatuan

Lipa

Sta.Maria

Binangonan

Cainta

Rodriguez

San Mateo

Taytay

Gen. Trias

Binan

San Pedro

Batangas

Olongapo

Tarlac

Angels

Tayabas

Lucena

Lipa

Mabalacat

Trece Martires

Lubao


11/51

Gateway airports and seaports

Clark

Airport(DMIA)

NAIA

New NAIA

(tentative)

100km

11

Gateway Airports Gateway Seaports

Shift cargo-handling function of Metro Manilato Subic and Batangas

Regenerate Manila Port to high value-addeddiversified waterfront areas

Development of New NAIA (existing NAIAwill be closed and converted for NewCBD

Development of CLARK (core airport forcentral and northern cluster; alternativeto New NAIA)

Port Area Capacity

MICT (ICTSI) 1,500,000

South (ATI) 850,000

Subic 600,000

Batangas 400,00


12/51

Proposed transport network for GCR

12

Transport as a catalyst to: integrate cities, growth centers, gateways,

urban and rural areas within a region facilitate local economic development,

enhance social integrity, and promoteenvironmental sustainability

facilitate planned/guided urban growth andexpansion of Metro Manila

Transport network in the regionmust be: hierarchical multimodal disaster-resilient intelligent

service-oriented, rather than hardinfrastructure

Main components improve gateway ports (Subic & Batangas)

and airport (CLARK) north-south transport backbone expressway

& mass-transit) secondary roads for Region III & Region IV-A

Proposed Transport Network for GCR


13/51

Impact of proposed transport network(estimated travel time from Manila)

Today Future (Dream Plan)

13

60 min

90 min

120 min

150 min


14/51

Urban Issues of Metro Manila


15/51

Rapid growth of Metro Manila

15

Population Density (persons/ha)

Seoul : 170

Jakarta : 131

Shanghai : 124

Metro Manila (2010) (Tokyo/23 wards)

Area620 km2 (621km2)

Population11.86 mil (9.05 mil)

Population density 191 pax/ha

(146pax/ha)

5,926

7,929

9,933

11,85813,109

13,904

3,396

5,005

7,970

11,170

13,425

15,486

0

4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

(000)

Mmanila BRLC (Bulacan, Rizal, Laguna, Cavite)

Tokyo 1920-1960 3.3 8.3 mil (5 mil)

MManila 1950-1990 1.6

7.9 mil (6.3 mil)1990-2010 7.9 - 11.9 mil (4 mil)

Expansion of Urban Area


16/51

Core issue #1 : Management of population distribution and spatial expansion is the keyfor sustainable development of Metro Manila.

Continuous population inflow to MManila:additional 1.8 million by 2030 if current trendcontinues. Population density increased from 158

person/ha to 195 person/ha between 1996 and2010.

Growth in peri-urban areas (BRLC): additional 3.9million by 2030

Population DensityPopulation Growth

Earthquake Flood

Population Distribution

Expansion of urban area should be directed the north-south,because lands in the east and west are high risk of hazard. 16


17/5117

Core issue #2: Increasing hazard risk and degrading environment

No. of households living in hazard areas

High risk areas: 1.4 mil. (GCR), 0.5 mil. (MManila) Moderate risk areas: 1.8 mil. (GCR), 0.7 mil.

(MManila)

No. of ISFs living along waterways; 60,130(MManila)

No. of ISFs in priority waterways; 19,440(San Juan River, Manggahan Floodway, EsteroTripa de Gallina, Maricaban Creek, Tullahan River,Pasig River, Estero de Maypajo, Estero de SunogApog)

Where and how they can beresettled?


18/5118

Core issue #3: Need for affordable housing

Distribution of Informal Settlers

Affordable housing needs (Metro Manila 2006)

Backlog: 800,000 households Resettlement: 300,000

Upgrading: 500,000


19/51

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

02 07 13 19 24

%o

fDailyTraffic

Direction1

Direction 2

2-way

Core issue #4 : Traffic congestion

Traffic demand and impact (Mega Manila)

19

2030 Do Nothing

Hourly Traffic Distribution on MManila Roads 1)

1) Results from 11 survey stations, 2012

*Bulacan, Rizal, Laguna, Cavite

Volume/ Capacity Ratio

V/C > 1.50 (beyond capacity)

V/C = 1.00 1.50 (at & above capacity)

V/C = 0.75 1.00 (reaching capacity)

V/C < 0.75 (below capacity)

2012 2030 30/12

Traffic demand(mil. trips/day

Metro Manila 12.8 14.5 1.13BRLC* 6.0 8.0 1.33

Public transport share in total demand 69% 69% 1.00

Occupancy of road space by private vehicles 78% 78% 1.00

Transport cost

(Php bil./day)

Metro Manila 2.4 6.0 2.50

BRLC 1.0 3.5 3.50

Air quality

(mil. Tons/year)Metro Manila

GHG 4.79 5.72 1.19

PM 0.014 0.019 1.36

BRLCGHG 3.20 4.49 1.40PM 0.005 0.010 2.00


20/51

20

Popular traffic congestion scenes in daily life of Metro Manila


21/51

Core issue #5 : Paradigm shift of spatial structure

21

1977 Metro Plan

From radial/circumferential to ladder type

Dedensification of congested urban center

Guided expansion of peri-urban areas

Development of sub-centers

Recovery of open space

Redevelopment of central areas

Conventional

1

Proposed


22/51


23/51


24/51

Where and how toresettle them?

opulation increase (1230)

Metro Manila: 1.8 million

BRLC: 3.9 million

24

Batangas

Balanga

Tarlac

Angels

San Fernand

Palayan

Cabanatuan

Gapan

Malolos

Tayabas

LucenaLipa

San PabloTanauan

Tagaytay

Trece Martires

Dasmarinas

Bacoor

Calamba

Sta. Rosa

Antipolo

San Jose Del Monte

Meycauayan

Imus

Cabuyao

25km

50km

100km

125km

Distribution of Large-scalePrivately-owned Properties

3,600ha

1,000ha

45ha

100ha

85ha

88ha1,500ha

6,800ha

100ha 260ha

1,000ha600ha

400ha

342ha

100ha

100ha

50ha

75km

Opportunities exist for large-scale new towns

Availability of large-scale properties

along the north-south corridor Active subdivision developments by

private sector

Decree to provide 20% of total units forlow cost housing

Formulate a PPP model based oncontrol and guidance

Public: planning and enforcement,north-south mass transit, access tostations, basic infrastructure, publicfacilities

Private: housing (resettlement, low tomedium cost), commercial/businessfacilities, industrial parks, relocation ofuniversities


25/51

Core issue #6: Need for improved urban management

25

Coordinated and integrated growth

management strategy Transport, land use and environment

Land use and hazard risk reduction

Updated land use plan and zoningregulations

Enforcement and developmentcontrol

Strategy and more effective cross-sector approach to curb urban sprawland promote urban expansion in

integration with mass-transit

Transport and traffic

Technical/ physical coordinationand integration of transportinfrastructures and facilities

Role of LGUs; Row acquisition,articulated secondary/ local roads,

more attention to sidewalks/pedestrian friendly facilities, localtraffic management, opening up ofselected roads within gatedcommunities, promotion of NMT,support to public transport

More effective involvement ofstakeholders for trafficenforcement, awarenessenhancement


26/51

Mega Manila Transport Dream Plan


27/51

What is Dream Plan?

27

Notraffic congestion

Nohouseholds living in high hazard risk areas

Nobarrier for seamless mobility

Noexcessive transport cost burden for low-incomegroups

Noair pollution


28/51

Main components of dream plan

28

At-grade roads(urban roads)

Missing links: C3, C5, bridges and others 137km of new roads

Flyovers Sidewalks and pedestrian facilities

Expressways Intercity expressway (426 km) Urban expressway network (78 km)

Urban/Suburbanrail

Main lines: 246 km (6 lines) Secondary lines: 72 km (5 lines) Integrated lines and improved accessibility

Bus/Jeepneys Modern fleet and operation Rationalized route structure Improved terminals/interchange facilities

Trafficmanagement

Traffic signals (ITS) Traffic safety

Traffic environment and education


29/51

29

Main transport network at metropolitan level

Road/Expressway ProjectsSuburban/Urban Rail Projects

To strengthen north-south transport axis toguide future urbanexpansion

To promote shift fromroad-based traffic to

rail-based mass transit To strengthen network

resiliencethroughintegrated multi-modaltransport system (urbanroads, expressways andrail-transit includingMRT, LRT, AGT and BRT)

29


30/51

Main transport network in the central areas


30


31/51


32/51

Mass-transit systems and TOD for improved mobility (examples)

32

Commuter rail

(Odakyu Line)

Tokyo Metro

(MRT)

LRT Greenmover

(Hiroshima)

Monorail (Chiba)

Guideway Bus

(Nagoya)

Total length of railway in Tokyo

metropolitan 3,000km

Station plaza (interchange facilities)

(Kawasaki)

LRT & feeder bus (Toyama)

Monorail (integrated with commercial/

other buildin Kokura

BRT (Gifu city)

Linear motor car (Aichi)


33/51

Mega Manila commuter service expansion program

Objectives

To strengthen connectivity between MetroManila and adjoining municipalities in RegionIII and IV-A

To establish a competitive (high quality andcapacity) north south public transportbackbone

To guide urban development of new urbancenters along the route to meet large

resettlement demands Program components

Coordinated design and construction of railway,expressway and at-grade roads for maximumutilization of existing PNR ROW

Improved traffic management along the route

Planning and implementation of TOD and land-use management

Project (Malolos - Calamba)

Route length; 91 km (total)

Elevated with modern high capacity train Future extension to CLARK and the rest of

Luzon island

33

Key considerations

Technical adjustment of expressways and rail structures and institutional coordinationbetween/among relevant organizations to ensure efficient railway operation and services.

Impacts

no level crossings at main roads

landuse are connected at-grade urban roads created


34/51

CBD transit system development

Need for strengthening transit accessto/from CBD

Strengthen Network connectivity of railnetwork

Vitalize CBD activities

34

EDSA Subway (San Jose Del MonteDasmarinas)


35/51


36/51

Road-based public transport modernization

Bus modernization program Comprehensive approach is necessary to modernize bus system

and services

Bus fleet, bus terminals, route planning, fare setting andcollection are all interrelated.

Need for a participatory study Jeepney modernization program

Improvement of vehicles (safety, air pollution)

Improvement of operation and management

Shift to low emission vehicles (LEVs)

Bus/jeepney support program Infrastructure: terminals, interchange facilities

Route rationalization

Subsidy

Roads and railways will be insufficient in solving traffic congestion . . .71% of trips today and 30 % in 2030 still rely on buses and jeepneys . . .

Bus exclusive lane

Modern bus and facilities

Improvement of jeepney terminals

Need for a comprehensive road-based public

transport study36


37/51

Traffic management : Smart Traffic (TEAM 5) Program

37

Infrastructure/facilities:signaling, intersectionimprovement, flyovers,parking, IT, others

Traffic safety

Demand management

Pedestrian/NMTenvironmentimprovement

Traffic management is the most fundamental action to maximize

capacities and use of available infrastructure in the most efficient andeffective manner.

Capacity building: enforcement and education

Component of intelligent transport system (example)

Incident Detection Electronic Road Pricing

Road Maintenance

Scheduling & Monitoring

Bus Scheduling Assistance

Transit Priority

Travel Time Prediction

Intelligent Parking

Signal Control Systems


38/51

Park & Ride facilities

Community Cycle (Bicycle sharing)

Car sharing at convenience storeElectric vehicle and charging station

Personal urban mobility car

Pedestrian zone

Bus stop facilities with billboard business

Mobile navigation system for rail

Automatedticketing system Mechanical multi-storey parking38


39/51

ProjectLength

(km)

Cost

(Php mil.)Status

Mega Manila North-South CommuterRailway (MalolosCalamba, Elevated) 91.3 195,520 Proposed

Malolos-Tarlac & Calamba-Batangas 128.8 47,680 Proposed

MainLi

nes

Line_1-3 Upgrades Existing Lines 47.2 62,040 Proposed

LRT 1

North (to Malabon) 2.7 9,960 Proposed

South (to Dasmarinas)* 30.2 111,640Committed

/ Proposed

LRT 2

East (to Antipolo)* 13.2 61,640Committed

/ ProposedWest (to MM North Harbor) 4.7 30,840 Proposed

MRT 3 Ext. (to Malabon & MoA) 9.4 68,600 Proposed

MRT-7 (Recto-Comm.Av.- Banaba)* 26.1 128,360 Committed

N-S Subway (Dasmarinas East - San

Jose Delmonte)68.6 514,160 Proposed

Total Primary (Incl. Upgrade) 202.1 987,240

Total Main 422.2 1,230,440

SecondaryLines

Ortigas - Angono 13.7 31,720 Proposed

Paco - Pateros 11.3 33,800 Proposed

Marikina - Katipunan 16.8 31,480 Proposed

Alabang - Zapote 9.3 13,400 Proposed

ZapoteCaviteGen Trias 20.6 25,560 Proposed

Total Secondary 71.1 135,960

Total Metro Rail 493.9 1,366,400

ProjectLength

(km)

Cost

(Php mil.)Status

Road

C3 Missing Link (Sanjuan - Makati)* 5.9 24,000 Proposed

C5 Missing Link 6.9 680Committed/

Proposed

Pasig River Bridge (BGC

Ortigas)*1.2 8,120 Proposed

Skyway-FTI-C5 Connector* 3.0 17,880 Committed

Other Interchanges/Flyovers 6.7 8,040 Committed

Other Urban Roads 32.9 2,400 Committed

NCR (Secondary Roads Package) 208.4 145,760 Proposed

BRCL (Secondary Road Package) 432.2 82,360 Proposed

Region III (Sec Roads - Approx.) 200.0 16,000 Proposed

Region IV-A (Sec RoadsApprox.) 400.0 32,000 Proposed

Road Total 1,297 337,240

Expressway

SEG 9 & 10/ connection to R10* 8 8,600 Committed

NLEX-SLEX Connector* 13.3 18,800 Committed

Skyway Stage 3* 13.3 9,000 Committed

NAIA Expressway Phase2* 7.1 15,000 Committed

Pasay - MakatiBGC 9.3 24,200 Proposed

Sta. Mesa - Pasig (Shaw

Boulevard)7.1 23,440 Proposed

CALA Exp. (Bacoor - Sta. Rosa)* 47.2 30,200 Committed

Other Expressways 388.3 221,840Committed/

Proposed

Expressways Upgrade 208.4 33,040 Proposed

Expressway Total 702 384,120Roads & Expressway Total 1,999 721,360


Projects of Dream Plan (1)

*Short term project


40/51

Name of Project

Amount

(Phpmillion)

Status

1. NAIAa. NAIA Improvementairside package*

4,240Committed

b. NAIA improvementslandside package* Committed

2. Clark

a. Clark improvement - airside package*6,800

Committed

b. Clark improvementlandside package* Committed

c. Clark Future Development 40,000 Proposed

3. New NAIA 140,500 Proposed

Airport Infrastructure Total 191,040 -

40

A. Airports

B. Ports D. Road-based Public Transport

Sub-total (A-D) PhP 323 billion ( USD8.1 billion)

Name of Project

Amount

(Php

million)

Status

1. ITS (3 Provincial Bus Terminals)* 6,320 Committed

2. 2-BRT Lines*7,000

Proposed

3. Jeepney Fleet Modernization 30,000 Proposed

4. Urban Bus Fleet Modernization 25,000 Proposed

Road-based Public Transport 68,320 -

Name of Project

Amount

(Phpmillion)

Status

1. Modernization of traffic signaling system * 5,000 Committed

2. ITS & Other Road safety Interventions 2,800 Proposed

3. Pedestrian Facilities 2,000 Proposed

Traffic Management / Capacity Expansion -Total 9,800 -

C. Traffic Management Projects

Name of Project

Amount

(Php

million)

Status

1. Replacement of North Harbor 40,000 Proposed

2. Other regional Ports 2,000 Proposed

3. Other Port Program* 12,080 Proposed

Port Projects Total 54,080 -

Total Investment Program for Transport: Php 2,411 billion (USD 60.3 billion)

Projects of Dream Plan (2)

*Short term project


41/51


42/51

42

Preliminary evaluation of Dream Plan

Economic impact:

VOC saving: Php 2.1 bil./day = Php 630 bil./year

Time cost saving: Php 1.9 bil./day = Php 570 bil./year

Financial impact:

Toll and fare revenue:Php 397 mil./day = Php 119 bil./year

Social impact:

Public transport fare saving: Php 18/person/day (from Php 42 to Php 24)

Travel time reduction: 55 min./persontrip (from 80 min. to 25 min.)

Environmental impact: Reduction in GHG: 5,760 ton/day (from 19,100 to 13,300 ton/day)

Reduction in PM: 47 ton/day (from 63 to 16 ton/day

Reduction in NOx: 65 ton/day (from 197 to 132 ton/day)

Total investment cost up to 2030: Php 2,411 bil. (US$ 60.3 bil.)

f f


43/51

Impact of Dream Plan (estimated travel time from Manila)

43

Today Future (Dream Plan)


44/51

Short-term investment program(2014-2016)

C i i f l i i i j


45/51

Criteria for selecting priority projects

Consistency with policies and strategies: Projects must beconsistent with the chosen policy, must optimize use of existingassets (such as traffic engineering and management, as well as newroads that improve overall network connectivity and efficiency), andmust promote public transport usage take precedence overprojects that encourage private cars.

Doability or high possibility of being completed or of startingconstruction on or before 2016. This implies a high degree ofproject maturity, e.g., availability of feasibility studies, and a bias forclearing the backlog of unimplemented transport infrastructure.

Robustness : Ability of the project in resolving present and futurecapacity constraints.

45

Sh P (2014 2016)


46/51

Short-term Program (2014 2016)

Name of ProjectAmount

(Php Mil.)Status

1. MissingLinks of C5

a. Flyover on CP Garcia in Sucat 251 Committedb. Coastal Rd/C5 Extn. South Flyover 210 Committedc. C5 South Extn. Flyover at SLEX 235 Proposed

2. Global City-Ortigas Link Road 8,120 Proposed3. Skyway/FTI/C5 Link 17,880 Committed4. C3 Missing Links (S. Juan to Makati (Sta Ana oval)) 24,000 Proposed5. EDSA Rehabilitation 3,744 Committed6. Plaridel Bypass, packages 3 & 4 900 Committed7. Metro

Manila

Interchanges

/Flyovers

a. C4 EDSA-Taft Ave. to Roxas Blvd. 2,430 Committedb. C4: Roosevelt/Congressional 941 Committedc. C4: West Ave. /North

Ave./Mindano Ave.1,502 Committed

d. C5: Greenmeadows/Acropolis 1,575 Committede. C5: Pasig-Bagong Ilog 435 Committedf. C2: Gov Forbes/Espana 1,070 Committed

Roads Total 63,293 -


(Php Mil.)Status

1. Daang Hari-SLEX Link Tollroad 2,000 Committed2. NLEX-SLEX

Connectors

a. Link Expressway (MNTC) 7,800 Committedb. Skyway 3 section (Citra) 9,000 Committedc. Common section (DPWH) 11,000 Committedd. Seg. 9&10, and connection to R10 8,600 Committed

3. NAIA Expressway, phase 2 15,520 Committed4. CALA Expressway, stages 1 and 2 14,232 Committed5. CLLEX Phase I (La Paz, TarlacCabanatuan) 12,833 Committed6. Calamba-Los Baos Expressway 16,900 Proposed7. C6 extensionLakeshore Dike Road 43,380 Proposed

8. Segment 8.2 of NLEx to Comm. 7,000 Proposed

Expressways Total 148,265 -


(Php Mil.)Status

1. Secondary Road Packages 69,100 Proposed

2. Preparatory studies for several projects 500 Proposed

3. Other Central Luzon Road Projects 16,000Committed4. Other Southern Luzon Road Projects 36,360CommittedOther Roads Total 121,960 -

A. Roads B. Expressways

C. Other Roads

46


47/51

47


(Php Mil.)Status

1. LRT1 - Cavite Extension (Niyog) 30,764 Committed2. LRT2 - East Extension 9,446 Committed3. MRT3 Capacity Expansion 10,200 Committed4. MRT 7 stage1 (Quezon Ave.Commonwealth Ave.) 51,870 Committed5. AFCS Common Ticketing System 1,722 Committed6. System Rehabilitations for LRT1 and 2 4,500 Committed7. Mega

Manila

North-

SouthCommuter

Railway

a. AER Phase 1 (Malolos-Manila)

24,800

Proposedb. South Com. Stg.1 (Manila-Calamba) Committedc. Remedial for Phase 1 of NS Rail Link Proposed

8. Metro Manila CBD Transit System Project Study 120 Proposed

9. F/S of New Transport System (e.g. Monorail , AGT) 75 Proposed

Railways Total 146,897 -


(Php Mil.)Status

1. ITS (3 Provincial Bus Terminals) 6,300 Committed2. Public Road Passenger Transport Reform Study 60 Proposed

3. BRT System 1 3,500 Proposed

Road-based Public Transport 9,860 -


(Php Mil.)Status

1. Modernization of traffic signalling system 5,000 Committed2. Systematic Road Safety Interventions 1,000 Proposed

3. Comprehensive Traffic Management Study 50 Proposed

Traffic Management Projects Total 6,050 -


(Php Mil.)Status

1. NAIAa. NAIA Improvementairside package

4,249Committed

b. NAIA improvementslandside package Committed2. Clark

a. Clark improvement - airside package

6,802

Committedb. Clark improvement

landside package Committed

3. Feasibility Study of a New NAIA 50 Proposed

Airport Infrastructure Total 11,125 -


(Php Mil.)Status

1. Projects for North Harbor 6,000 Committed2. Projects for South Harbor 1,000 Committed

3. MICT 4,000 Committed4. Feasibility Study of NH Redevelopment 75 Proposed

5. Other ports 1,010 Proposed

Port Projects Total 12,085 -

D. Railways

E. Road-based public Transport

F. Traffic Management Projects

G. Airports

H. Ports*

*Planned expansion projects recommended for rescheduling to promote diversion of cargo to Batangasand Subic ports as well as decongest roads of Metro Manila.

Short-term Program (2014 2016) = Php 520 billion

L ti f h t t j t


48/51

Urban/Suburban Rails

Main Roads/Expressways/Etc.

Locations of short-term projects

Malolos

Calamba

48


49/51

D ft Fi l R t


50/51

Draft Final Report

Chapter Sections

1. Introduction 1.1 Background and Objective

1.2 Study Approach

2. Development

of the Metro

Region

2.1 The Greater Capital Region

2.2 Development Issues Facing

Metro Manila

2.3 Vision and Strategies

3. Transport

Development

Strategies

3.1 Current Transport Infrastructure

and Services

3.2 Current Transport Services

3.3 Estimated Travel Demand

3.4 Development Challengers and

Key Strategies

3.5 The Dream Plan

Chapter Sections

4. TransportInvestment

Program

4.1 Criteria for Priority Setting

4.2 Review of Agency Investment

Programs

4.3 Recommended Short Term Investment

Program

(2014-16)

4.4 Tentative Medium and Long TermInvestment Program

4.5 Financing Strategy

4.6 Necessary Preparatory Studies

5. Conclusions

and Recom-

mendations

5.1 The Roadmap Context

5.2 Budget Envelop5.3 Sector Governance

Appendices

50

A. Main Report (prepared and submitted for comments)

B. Technical Reports

C. ATLAS

D. Roadmap Projects


51/51

jica presentation roadmap for transport infrastructure development

Documents