jesus as change agent (john 21).pdf20140111-40550-e1pj7c-libre-libre
DESCRIPTION
bibleTRANSCRIPT
Runninghead:Jesusaschangeagent(John21:125)
Jesusaschangeagent(John21:125)
BryanEasley
RegentUniversity
Jesusaschangeagent2
Abstract
JesusactsasanagentofchangeinreversingPeter’srelationshipwithJesusduetohisdenial
ofJesus.Asaleader,Jesusinitiatesandfacilitatesthisreversalandrestoration,something
Peterisunabletodoonhisown.SeeingJesusasaleaderofchangeinthissettingprovidesa
deeperunderstandingofhowtoday’sleaderscanproperlyviewthepeopleandcircumstances
inwhichtheylead.
Jesusaschangeagent3
InnerTextureAnalysis
NarratologicalUnitsinJohn21:125
TherearethreeidentifiablenarrativeunitswithinJohn21:1‐25bracketedbyan
introductorytransitionsentenceandsummarizationoftheauthor’sveracityregardingthe
entiregospelaccount.ThefirstunitbeginswitharosterofcharactersinJohn21:2and
concludeswiththenarrator’ssummaryinJohn21:14.ThesecondunitbeginswithJesusasking
aquestionofPeterandendswithJesustellingPetertofollow.ThethirdunitbeginswithPeter
seeingJohnandendsinJohn21:24withJohn’stestimonial.
Unit1focusesontheactionsofPeterandahandfulofotherdisciplesduringthetime
followingtheresurrectionofJesus.Theeventcentersonanunsuccessfulovernightfishingtrip
thatendswithPeterjumpingfromtheboattoruntomeetJesus.Hisinstructionresultsina
miraculouscatchoffishandasubsequentbreakfastonthebeach.Theauthorselectively
concludesthismeetingbyinformingthereaderthatthiswasthethirdappearanceofJesusto
thedisciples(John21:14).
Unit2shiftsthescenetofocusprimarilyonJesusandPeter.Thissectionisbuiltarounda
progressiverhetoricalargumentaboutPeterthatcuriouslyterminatesinarecitationofthe
author’sfuturefate.Thisunitisprimarilydialogical.Thesetting(sittingaroundthefireeating)
issimplybackgroundtotheconversation.
Unit3recountsaquestionPeterasksJesus,namelyaboutthefateofJohn,whowasthere
eatingwiththem.Thisunitissomewhatstrangeinthatthesubjectmatterhaslittletodowith
theprecedingversesortopic.Theonlyobviouspointofconnectionisthereaffirmationthat
PeteristofollowJesusregardless.Itsprimaryfunctionseemstobetomakeastatementabout
theauthorratherthanPeter.
RepetitiveProgressiveTextureandPattern
ProgressionofTheme
Jesusaschangeagent4
Figure1showsalistofrepeatedwordsandideasfoundinJohn21:1‐25.Thisprogression
revealsadistinctshiftinsubjectbetweenthefirsttwounits(John21:1‐14and21:15‐23).Inthe
firstunit(John21:1‐14),fishoccursfrequently.Theactoffishing,thecatchingoffish,andthe
eatingoffishforbreakfastarecenterpiecesintheplotofthissub‐unit.Thesubjectoffishdoes
notoccuragaininthelargerpassageafterJohn21:13.
Inthesecondunit(John21:15‐23),adifferentthemeisrevealed.Here,theprimary
elementsarethequestionoflovingJesus,feedingsheep,andfollowingJesus.Theseideasare
notpresentpriortoJohn21:15.Aclearshiftoccursatthestartofthissection,thusmarkingit
asadistinctivesub‐unitinthepassage.
Figure1
RepeatedwordsandideasinJohn21:1‐25
21:1
JOHN21:2‐14
21:2
21:3 fishing,
caughtnothing
21:4
21:5 fish
21:6 fish net
21:7
21:8 fish net
21:9 fish
21:10 fish
21:11 fish net
21:12
21:13 fish
21:14
JOHN21:15‐19
21:15 love?sheep? yes
21:16 love?sheep? yes
21:17 love?sheep? Yes,youknoweverything
21:18
21:19 followme
21:20 following
JOHN21:20‐23
21:21
21:22 followme
21:23
21:24
21:25
Jesusaschangeagent5
Progressionofnames
AsimilaranalysisoftheprogressionandrepetitionofnamesandcharactersinJohn21:1‐25
alsorevealssignificantpatterns,visualizedinFigure2.ThesepatternsrevealthatJesusand
SimonPeterarethetwodominantcharactersinthenarrative.Thispassageisprimarilyabout
thetwoofthem.Otherdisciplesappearinthefirstunit(John21:1‐14)and,curiously,the
author(John)placestwothird‐personreferencestohimselfintheendofthepericope.
Figure2
ProgressionofnamesinJohn21:1‐25
Severaltimes,thedisciplesrefertoJesusas“Lord.”ThisishowPeteraddressesJesusinthe
thrice‐repeatedinterrogationinJohn21:15‐17.PeterissometimesreferredtoSimon,
sometimesasPeter,andsometimesasSimonPeter.Inthenarrative,Jesusdoesnotaddress
PeterusingtheGreekappellationwhichJesushimselfgavePeter(John1:42).
21:1 Jesus
JOHN21:2‐13
21:2 Peter Thomas,Nathanael,sons,2others
21:3 SimonPeter
21:4 Jesus Disciples
21:5 Jesus they
21:6 He they
21:7 JesustheLord Peter,SimonPeter thatdisciplewhomJesusloved
21:8 otherdisciples
21:9 they
21:10 Jesus
21:11 SimonPeter
21:12 Jesus,Lord Them
21:13 Jesus Them
21:14 Jesus Disciples
JOHN21:14‐19
21:15 Jesus,Lord SimonPeter,Simon,sonofJohn
21:16 Lord Simon,sonofJohn
21:17 Lord,Jesus Simon,sonofGod
21:18
21:19
JOHN21:14‐19
21:20 Jesus Peter disciplewhomJesusloved
21:21 Jesus,Lord Peter
21:22 Jesus
21:23 brothers,thisdisciples
21:24 thedisciple
21:25 Jesus
Jesusaschangeagent6
Progressionofscope
Thepassagebeginswiththegroupofdisciplesoutfishingandprogressestoadialogue
aboutPeter’sfuturewithChrist.Peterisacentralfigureinthisprogression.Heistheonewho
initiatesthefishingtrip(John21:3).HeistheonewhoactsfirsttogotoJesusafterJesusis
recognized(John21:7).HeistheonewhomJesusinterrogates(John21:15‐17).Finally,heisthe
oneJesusinstructsto“followme”(John21:19,22).Thescopenarrowsfromagroupactivityon
thewatertoachange‐orientedexchangewithJesus.Theopeningunit(John21:2‐14)servesto
settheinterrogativeconversationinameaningfulcontext.Thefishing,thefire,andthenature
ofthequestionsJesusasksrefertoearliereventsinwhichPeterwasaparticipant.
OpeningMiddleClosingTexture
AsanarrativepericopewithinthelargergospelofJohn,21:1‐25isanorganized,definable
unitwithadistinctbeginning,middle,andend.Theopening‐middle‐closingtextureofthe
wholepassage(John21:1‐25)canbeillustratedasseeninTable1.
Table1
Opening‐Middle‐ClosingTextureofJohn21:1‐25
Location Summary
Opening: 21:1 Jesusrevealshimselfonelasttime
Middle: 21:2‐24 JesusappearstoPeterandtheothersandrestoresPeter’s
relationshiptoJesus
Closing: 21:25 Jesusdidmanyotherunrecordedthings
Thisopening‐middle‐closingtextureanalysisalsohelpsidentifythebreakdownofthe
passageintoitssmallerunits.Theopening‐middle‐closingtextureforeachoftheunitsinthe
passagecanbeseeninTable2.
Unit1:John21:2‐14
Theopeningofthefirstunitestablishestheplaceandsetting.Havingunderstoodthatthis
narrativeisultimatelyaboutanappearanceofJesus(theintroductorytransitioninJohn21:1),
Jesusaschangeagent7
wenowlearnthatatleastsomeofthedisciplesaretogetherandhavesomeformoforganized
relationship.Basedonearliergospelnarrativesregardingtheirformeroccupationsasfishermen
(Mark1:16),wemightassumethattheyhavereturnedtothisvocationinsomedegree.
Thisopeningestablishesthecontextnecessarytomakesenseofboththemiddleandthe
endofthisunit.ThedisciplesbeingtogetherandreturningtofishatPeter’ssuggestionplaces
themnaturallyinthepositionforJesustoappeartotheminsuchafamiliarfashion(Luke5:4‐
9).TheendingoftheunitsetsthestagefortheconversationbetweenPeterandJesus.
Table2
Opening‐Middle‐ClosingTextureinUnitsofJohn21:1‐25
Location Summary
John21:1 IntroductoryTransition
John21:2‐14
Opening:21:2‐3 Simonandsixdisciplesgofishing
Middle:21:4‐13 badfishingturnsgood,eatingbreakfastwithJesus
Closing:21:13 Narratorannouncesthisisthethirdappearance.
John21:14‐20
Opening:21:14a Breakfasthasconcluded
Middle:21:14b‐18 JesusinterrogatesPeteraboutlovinghim
Closing:21:19 NarratorexplainsreasonforJesus’words
John21:21‐24
Opening:21:20 PeterseesJohn
Middle:21:21‐23 PeterasksJesusaboutJohnandisanswered
Closing:21:23 Narratoridentifieshimselfandsummarizes
John21:25 Conclusion
Jesusaschangeagent8
Thereisachangeintopicsfromopeningtoclosing.Inthisunit,catchingtoomanyfish
replacestheproblemofnotcatchingany.Thecharacterschange,aswell.Therearesix
disciplesatthestartandJesusispresentattheend.
Unit2:John21:15‐19
Theopeningisquitebriefhere.BreakfasthasconcludedandJesusasksPeteraquestion.
Therelationshipofthisopeningtotheunit’sconclusionissubtlebutsignificant.Theconclusion
isanaffirmationthatPeterwillglorifyGodinhisdeath.Thiscomesinthecontextofashared
mealaroundburningcoalsandaconversationwherePeteraffirmshisloveofJesus.This
combinationofopeningandclosingisadirectcontrasttoPeter’searlierbetrayalofChristwhen
deathloomedasarealthreattohim(Luke22:61).
Inthesecondunit,thesubjectmovesfromloveandfeedingsheeptothenatureofPeter’s
futuredeath.
Unit3:John21:20‐24
TheopeningofthethirdunitseemsalmostanticlimacticafterJesus’conversationwith
Peter.PeterasksJesuswhatwillhappentoJohn.Theprimaryfocusofthislastunitisnoton
PeterbutonJohn.Itseemstoserveasanextendedapologeticfortheveracityofthelarger
storyitself.Johnintentionallywantstoplacehimselfinthestory.Thisisperplexingonthe
surfacebutmakesmoresensewhenconnectedtotheclosingoftheunitwhereJohnclaimsto
havewitnessedtheseeventsandistestifyingtotheirtruthfulness.Thisclosingunitdoesnot
extendthemeaningofthenarrativebutservesrathertovalidateit.Johnknowswhat
happenedtoPeterbecauseJohnwasthereandsawithimself.
NarrationalTexture
Scenes
Therearetwoscenesinthenarrative,onebeginningwiththePeter’sannouncementofhis
intentiontogofishing,thesecondwhenJesusservesbreakfast.TheboatscenestartsinJohn
21:3andcontinuesuntilJohn21:12.Thescenechanges(narrows)tothebreakfastfireonthe
beachinJohn21:14andremainsuntiltheend.
Jesusaschangeagent9
BothscenesarestrategicinJesus’reinstatementofPeter.Peterwasafishermanby
vocationandhadbeeninthemidstoffishingwhenJesusissuedhiscall.Jesus'fishingmetaphor
pointedtoPeter'sspiritualdestiny:“Iwillmakeyoufishersofmen”(Mark1:17).SincePeter’s
betrayalandJesus’deathandresurrection,therehasbeenlittlecontactbetweenPeterand
Jesus.InJohn’sfinalchapterofhisgospel,thecurtainraisesonPeterinhispre‐disciplesetting:
fishingfromaboatforrealfish.
Thesettingontheboatinvolvestheelementofvaineffort,athemethatissignificantboth
literallyandspiritually.Asafisherman,SimonPeterencounteredJesusinasimilarmannerin
thepast.Luke5recordsthestoryofPeter’scalltofollowJesusinitiallyascominginasimilar
context.Simonhadbeenfishingallnightandhadcaughtnothing.Jesuscomesalongandtells
themtoputthenetsdowninacertainplace.Thenetscomeupfullandonthevergeof
breaking.ThenarrativeofJohn21functionsasareinstatementofPetertoadiscipleofChrist.
Thepresenceofafishingboatintheopeningsettingreinforcesthisintention.JustasJesus
calledPeterfromfishinginthebeginning,sonowwillhisreinstatementtakeplaceinasimilar
place.
Spiritually,thecontrastofPeter’sinabilityandJesus’abilitytofillthenetsechoesPeter’s
abilitytofollowJesuswhenitwasmostdifficult.HisbetrayalandflightonthenightofJesus’
arrestmirrorsthelong,emptynightoffruitlessfishing.ThearrivalofJesusonthebeachwith
divineinstructionandprovisionmagnifiesPeter’sownneedfordivineinterventiontofollow
Jesustothedeath.
Thesecondsceneinthenarrativeisalsofamiliarandreachesbacktoacrucialeventin
Peter’spast.Thesettingaroundthefireofburningcoalsonthebeachcombinedwiththree
questionsaboutPeter’srelationshipwithJesusisunmistakable.JesushasbroughtPeter
emotionallyandspirituallybacktotheburningcoalsofthefirebarrelthereinthetemple
courtyardthenightofthearrest.
Voices
Jesusaschangeagent10
Therearethreedistinctvoicesthatspeakinthisnarrative:Peter,Jesus,andJohnasthe
narrator/author.StatementsofJesusandPetermarkthepacingofthenarrative.Peterhas
threespeaking“parts”thatframethisnarrativeintoitsessentialmeaning(Table3).
Table3
Peter’sspeakingpartsinJohn21:1‐25
Verse Phrase
21:3 “Iamgoingfishing”
21:15‐17 “Yes,Lord;youknowthatIloveyou!”
21:21 “Lord,whataboutthisman?”
ThesethreelinesofPeteressentiallyformthehooksuponwhichthisnarrative,itsplot,and
itsstructurehang.Peter’sannouncementinJohn21:3leadstothesevenmenbeingoutinthe
boatinthefirstplace.Peter’sthreerepeatedresponses(andJesus’threequestions)inJohn
21:15‐17istheclimaxoftheentirepassage.Peter’squestioninJohn21:21affirmsthe
presence—and,thus,veracityasawitness—ofJohnintheseevents.
TheotherprimaryvoiceinthetextisJesus.ItishisquestioninJohn21:5thatshiftsthe
moodfromfailuretosuccess.Hisinstructionin21:10transitionsthestoryfromtheboattothe
beach.Inthesecondunit(John21:14‐19),theclimacticsectionofthenarrative,Jesusasksthe
questionofPeterthatisfoundationaltoPeter’srestorationtoafullfollowerofJesus.
ThevoiceofJesusisthisrestorativequestion‐askingreinforcesthenecessityfordivinehelp
inbeinga“fisherofmen”.WhenPeterdeniedChristthreetimesaroundthefire,itwasaslave
girlwhoaskedthequestion.Jesuswasthusbetrayed.WhenJesuscomestoPeterandasksthe
sameessentialquestion–“doyouloveme?”–itisademonstrationtoPeterofforgivenessand
aninvitationtorestoredfellowship.
ThefinalphrasethatJohnrecountsJesusashavingsaid:“followme,”repeatedinJohn
21:19and21:22confirmsthisintention.PeterhadbeenfollowingJesusbeforethenightofthe
Jesusaschangeagent11
arrest.Hisreturntothefishingboatwasperhapsindicativeofhisownsenseoffailureand
inabilitytofollow.HistrajectorywastheoppositeoffollowingJesus.Jesus’exhortationtohim
afterthethreequestionsisareversalofthattrajectory.Inthisway,Jesus’voiceinthistextis
redemptiveandrestorative.
Thenarrator’svoiceappearsfourtimesinthetext,punctuatingthenarrativewithsummary
andexplanation.Intheopeningtwosentences,thenarratorsetsthepremise(Jesusreveals
himself)andthecase(sevenofthedisciples).InJohn21:14,thenarratoragainverifiesthiswas
thethirdtimeJesushadappearedtothedisciplesafterhisresurrection.Itmaybesignificant
thatthiswasthethirdappearance,tyingintothethreequestionsandfurtherreinforcingthe
actionsofPeterinthecourtyardandenhancingthereversalwhichJesusisintheactofbringing
about.
ThenarratorappearsagaininJohn21:19,explainingthereasonforJesus’statementinthe
precedingverseregardingPeter’sdeath.Thenarrator(John)emphasizesthatPeter’sactions
(anddeath)willglorifyGod,aclearcontrasttohisdenial.
ThenarratoridentifieshimselfclearlyastheauthorinJohn21:24,andoffersthereader
strongreasontotakehisaccountofPeterastruebecausehe(theauthor)wasphysicallythere.
Sequence
[Thediscussionofscenesandvoicesabovehasalreadyaddressedthesequenceofthe
narrative.]
Plot
ThisnarrativeisaboutJesusreinstatingPeterintofellowshipwithhimasadisciple.Thisisa
change‐orientedepisodeintendedtoreversetheconsequencesofPeter’sdenialinthetemple
courtyardduringJesus’trial,highlighttherealityofspiritualinabilityanddivinetransformation,
andsetthestageforPeter’sowndestinyasaleaderamongtheapostlesinthedaysfollowing
Pentecost.Theplotofthisbriefstorycomestogetheragainstthisbackdrop.
Peterhasevidentlyreturnedtohisformervocationofprofessionalfishing.Whetherthis
wasapatternsincethePassovereventsoraone‐timeepisodeissimplyunknown.Yet,itis
Jesusaschangeagent12
significantandrevealingofhumanbehaviorthatPeterhasgonebacktosomethingthathe
appearsnottohavedonesinceJesuscalledhimtofollow.Perhapsoneoftheconsequencesof
Peter’sdenialofJesuswasareversalofhisownlifeasadisciple,onehecouldevidentlydolittle
toremediate.
Thedisciplesonafishingboatunabletocatchfishisafamiliarsub‐plot.Asmentioned
earlier,Luke’saccountofPeter’scalltodiscipleshipbeganinjustsuchasetting.Thismaywell
explainthereasonJesuschosetoappearinthismannerwiththismethodofintroduction.It
wouldhavebeenobvioustoPeterwhoitwasandforwhomtheappearancewasintended.
Thisisnotaconfrontation,however,butarestorativemoment.Theinvitationtobreakfast
hasaEucharisticsensetoit;itisaninvitationtofellowshipandcommunion.Thebreakingof
bread,theprovidingofthemeatforthemeal,thequestionsandresponsesareallclearsignals
thatJesusdesiresthisrelationshiptocontinue.JesusinitiatestherestorationofPeterbut
carriesitoutinhighlysymbolicfashionthatdoesnotoverlookPeter’spastactions.
Jesusdidn’tneedtoaskPeterquestionsinordertoknowanswers;rather,thequestions
weremeantforPeter.Throughthem,heconfrontsthefactthatfollowingJesuswasnot
somethinghecoulddoonhisown.Earlier,whenfacedwiththethreatofarrestanddeath,he
deniedJesus.Yet,bytheendoftheirconversationonthebeach,JesuspredictsPeterwilldie
forhim.
Argumentativetexture
TheexchangebetweenPeterandJesusinJohn21:15‐17mostclearlyrevealsthe
argumentativetextureofthepassage.Therestofthepassageis,insomesense,
preparationandjustificationforthisrhetoricalpresentation.Theargumentmadehereis
thewholepremiseofthepassage.Table4presentstherhetoricalpatternofthesethree
verses.
Table4
ArgumentativeconstructionofJohn21:15‐18
Verse Pattern Character
21:15 question Jesus
Jesusaschangeagent13
answer Peter
command Jesus
21:16 redirectoforiginalquestion Jesus
answer Peter
repeatedcommand Jesus
21:17 redirectoforiginalquestion Jesus
answer Peter
repeatedcommand Jesus
21:18 propheticprediction Jesus
Thisistheclimacticargumentofthepassage.Thethree‐foldrepetitionofthequestion
aboutlovingJesusclearlyrelatestoPeter’sthree‐folddenial.Yet,thepatternrevealsnot
rebukeandjudgment,butrestorationandcompassion.ItisnotPeterwhoinitiatesordirects
theconversationbutJesuswhooffersPetertheopportunitytohavetheconsequencesofhis
actionsreversed.Theonewhowasbetrayedactstorestorefellowship.
Peter’srestorationcomeswithacaveat:heistoleadandcareforthosewhofollowJesus.
WhereasPetercaredonlyforhimself,inthatmomentoftrial,JesusiscallingPetertocarefor
othersasthemeansofdemonstratinghislove.Thisdemonstrationwillbewhole‐heartedand
culminateinPeter’smartyrdomforthesakeofJesus,aclearreversalofbothfortuneandmoral
backboneforPeter.
Sensoryaesthetictexture
Ananalysisofthesensoryelementsofthepassage(speech,emotion,andself‐expression)
doesnotrevealagreatdealmorethanhasalreadybeennoted.Theseelementsarechartedin
figure3.Forexample,theexperienceofthefullnetdoesn'tappearhereinaparticularly
emotionalfashion.Littleissaidabouttheepisodebeyond“theycaughtnothing”(John21:3)
and“nowtheywerenotabletohaulitin”(John21:6).Wedonotseethereactionofthe
disciplesherethewaythatwedoPeter’sinLuke5:8.
Onedynamicthatdoesemergemoreclearlyinthisexaminationistheunderlying
atmosphereoftensioninthepericope.Peter’sinstantresponsetoJohn’srecognitionofJesusis
Jesusaschangeagent14
reminiscentofPeter’szealousventureinMatthew14:29.Themomentseemsalmostinstinctive
hereasifPeterhasbrokenfreeofhispity‐inducedisolation.Thedisciplesaregatheredaround
thefirewithJesus.Clearlytheyknewwhohewas—Johnsaysasmuch(John21:12)—yethe
couchesthisknowledgeinthecontextofbeingtooafraidtoask.Whetherthissimplymeansit
wassoobvioustothemallorthattheyweregenerallyafraid,theuseof�τ�λμα(Gk.
Figure3
AesthetictextureinJohn21:1‐25
“boldness”)actstoheightenthesenseofaweandtensionaroundthefire.Themoodseems
tobeoneofuncertaintyandnervousanticipation.
ThetensioninthestorycarriesonthroughPeterandJesus’conversation.WhileJesus,
althoughdirect,isnotconfrontationalorargumentative,itnonethelesspricksPeter.Heis
“grieved”(John21:17)attheprobing,althoughtheimplicationisathimselfortherealityof
whathashappenedratherthanatJesusforasking.Then,inJohn21:22,Jesusmildlyrebukes
PeterforaskingaboutJohn,“whatisthattoyou?Youfollowme,”hetellshim.
21:1 revealed
21:2
21:3 caughtnothing
21:4 didnotknow
21:5 “Children”
21:6
21:7 threwhimself
21:8
21:9
21:10
21:11
21:12 nonedaredask
21:13
21:14 revealed
21:15 love feedmylambs
21:16 lamb feedmysheep
21:17 love feedmysheep grieved
21:18
21:19 “donotwanttogo” death,glorify follow
21:20 loved betray
21:21
21:22
21:23 “whatisthattoyou?”
21:24 true
21:25
Jesusaschangeagent15
Interestingly,thetensionhereremainsunresolved.Johnplacesthisfinalquestioninthe
roleofaffirminghisownpresenceinthestoryforthesakeofveracity.Onceheaccomplishes
hispurpose,thestoryconcludeswithoutfurtherdetail.We’renotleftknowingwhatoccurs
betweenJesusandPeterfromthispointon,atleastnotinthegospelaccount.
JesusasChangeAgentinJohn21:1‐25
Thispassageissignificantlyaboutchange.Peter,theprimarycharacter,isaprimaryfigure
throughouttheentirestoryofthelifeofJesusandthebeginningoftheChristianchurch.Peter
isavolatileandzealousdisciplewhoepitomizesboththelowpointandthehighpointof
discipleshipinthegospelnarratives.ThepictureofPeterthatemergesfrommostofthegospel
accountsisofahot‐headed,well‐intentionedbutover‐calculating,zealousdisciplerepeatedly
rebukedbyJesusbeforefallingflatonhisfaceinoutrightdenial.Inlightofthisgeneralpicture,
thethoughtthatPeterwouldfigureasasignificantleaderinthechurchafterPentecostishard
toimagine.
ThisepisodeinJohn21providesacrucialpieceofthepuzzleinrevealinghowthePeterof
thegospelsbecamethePeterofActs1‐3.Thestoryissetagainstthebackdropofearlierevents
intherelationshipbetweenJesusandhisdisciplesandJohnintentionallyplacesitasthe
concludingnarrativeinhisaccountofthegospel.Inthisarrangement,itbecomes,inaway,the
finalwordonPeterintheGospels.
Inthispericope,weseeJesusasanagentofchange.Itishiswordsandactionsthatinitiate
andenablePetertoexperienceareversalofwhathisdenialhadbroughttohim.Change,in
thisparticularemphasis,involvesthechangeinthestatusoftherelationshipbetweenPeter
andJesus.Itisarelationshipthathadbeenchangingallalong,evenbeforeJesus’arrest.It
begantochangewhenJesusannouncedforthefirsttimehisintentiontogotoJerusalemto
die.(Mark8).ThiseventmarksaturningpointintherelationshipbetweenPeterandJesus.
Peter’sreactioninthatmomentis,tosomedegree,thestartingpointforwhichthenarrativein
John21isaconclusionorresolution.TherelationshipchangesfurtherwhenPeterresponds
withvigorousrejectiontoJesus’predictionofhisdenial.Hisreactionisstrong:“EvenifIhaveto
diewithyou”(Mark14:31).Again,inthegardenwhenPetercutsofftheservant’sear(Luke
Jesusaschangeagent16
22:50),Jesus’reactionandsubsequenthealingoftheservantheightensthedistancebetween
himandPeter.Peter’sdenialofJesusstrikesthefinalblow.Thechasmbecomestremendous
and,atleastasitseemstoPeter,uncrossable.
Jesus’behaviorasaleaderisquitestartlingifviewedthroughcontemporarysecularlenses.
Peter’sbehaviorasafollowerwasdespicableandclearlyindicativeofamanwhowasnota
teamplayer,didn’tgetthevision,andwasdestructivetoothersontheteam.Charismatic
leadershipwouldhavemovedontofindothersmorewillingtobuyintothemission,perhaps
recruitanewpost‐resurrectionclassofdisciples.Transformationalleadershipmightsuggest
thattheleaderspendmoretimewithPeterexplainingtheimportanceofthemissionandwhy
buy‐inisnecessary.Thatis,iftheleadersawanythingworthwhilereasoninpursuingPeter
aftersuchacontraryact.Servantleadershipwouldmoveabitcloser,perhapscausingaleader
toaskwhatneedswentunmetthatcouldbeaddressedbytheleaderinordertorepairthe
situation.
Yet,Jesusdoessomethingthatisuniqueintermsofourtypicalthinkingaboutleader‐
followerrelationships.HemovestoactredemptivelybecauseherecognizesPeterisunable.He
doessobecauseheseesthelargerpurposeforPeter’sliferatherthantheconsequencesofhis
actions.JesusfacilitateschangeinPeter’sstatusandinvolvementinthedivinepurposethrough
anintentionalandinitiatingrelationalencounterthatneitheravoidsthecentralproblemnor
bringscondemnationforitsoccurrence.JesusfacilitatesthischangebycomingtoPeterwhere
hewas,actinginrecognizablefashion,invitinghimtoameaningful,relationalevent,and
framingquestionsaboutpastbehaviorinlightofpositivefutureidentityandpossibility.
Theologicallyspeaking,Jesus’leadershipinthissettingisdivinelyuniquebecauseofJesus’
redemptivemission.ThisissomethingonlyGodcando,toforgiveandtransformtheheartand
thefuturewreckedbyself‐centeredinadequacy.
Practicallyspeaking,asitcaninformabiblicalviewofleadership,Jesus’responsetoPeter
providesuswithaframeworkforourownleadershipinthelivesofotherpeople.Atleasttwo
principlesemergefromthisstudythathavegreatpotentialapplication.First,peoplearemore
valuablethanthesumoftheirpastbehaviors.Leadersshouldseefuturepossibilitiesfor
Jesusaschangeagent17
followers.Second,personalrelationshipisthefoundationfornavigatinganychange.People
interactwithcomplexrealities.Sometimestheydoitwell,othertimestheydoitpoorly.
Relationshipsinitiatedandsustainedbytheleadercangoalongwaytostabilizingfollowers
andleadersalikeinthefaceofbothsuccessandmistakes.