jenny brandefelt kth mechanics - smhi

32
Modelling past cold climates Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics LANDCLIM workshop in Norrköping February 23, 2011 Jens-Ove Näslund, Erik Kjellström, Gustav Strandberg, Barbara Wohlfarth, Ben Smith

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2022

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Modelling past cold climates

Jenny BrandefeltKTH Mechanics

LANDCLIM workshop in NorrköpingFebruary 23, 2011

Jens-Ove Näslund, Erik Kjellström, Gustav Strandberg, Barbara Wohlfarth, Ben Smith

Page 2: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Outline

To study the Earth's climate

Modelling the Earth's climate

A motivation for studying past climate

Climate model simulations of glacial climate- Last Glacial Maximum (LGM)- Greenland Stadial 3 (GS12)

Equilibration

Comparison to proxy SST

Summary

Page 3: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

To study Earth's climateAim

Understand each component of the climate system and how they interact

Improve predictions of future climate change in response to human activities

Tools

Data (from proxy archives and observational records)

Experiments

Laboratory

Modelling (conceptual and numerical)

Page 4: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Past climate variations recorded in natural archives

First example (time series):

Greenland icecore 18O record; a proxy for temperature

Data: NGRIP project members, 2004

~36°C

Page 5: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Past climaterecorded in natural archives

Second example (horizontal patterns): Temperature reconstructed from pollen data for the LGM (Last Glacial Maximum, ~18 ka BP)

Data: Wu et al, 2007

Coldest month of the year temperature anomalies from

the present day climate

Page 6: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Energy balance model

Radiative-convective model

Earth system models of intermediate complexity (EMICs)

Global climate models

Global Earth system models

C

O

M

P

L

E

X

I

T

Y

Numerical models – tools to understand climate

Page 7: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Modelatmospheric circulationocean circulationsea iceupper layers of land surfacefluxes of heat, water vapour and momentum between components

Based on the laws of physics:Newtons mechanicsThermodynamicsConservation of energy and mass

Parameterize small-scale processes, e.g.

cloud formationsmall-scale motions

Neglect/prescribe evolution of ”slow” processes, e.g.

glacier and ice sheet dynamics

vegetation dynamics global bio-geo-chemical

cycles

Global climate / Earth system modelsModel

atmospheric circulationocean circulationsea iceupper layers of land surfacefluxes of heat, water vapour and momentum between components

Based on the laws of physics:Newtons mechanicsThermodynamicsConservation of energy and mass

Page 8: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

The equations that describe the dynamics of the atmosphere, oceans, etc are solved numerically

1. Divide the atmosphere, oceans, land surface and sea ice into gridboxes

2. Assign one value of temperature, humidity etc to each gridbox

3. Determine the evolution of the variables based on physical laws

The model

Page 9: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Outline

To study the Earth's climate

Modelling the Earth's climate

A motivation for studying past climate

Climate model simulations of glacial climate- Last Glacial Maximum (LGM)- Greenland Stadial 3 (GS12)

Comparison to proxy SST

Summary

Page 10: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

The project

Motivation

The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB) are planning for a final repository for nuclear fuel waste.

After 100,000 years the radioactivity of the waste has decreased to enriched uranium levels.

Climate modelling

Identify extreme climate conditions that may occur during the coming 100,000 years. (www.skb.se)

Page 11: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Global and regional modelling

Global climate modelling: Community Climate System Model (CCSM3)

Regional climate modelling:

Rossby Centre Regional Climate

Model (RCA3)Comparison to proxydata

Regional vegetation modelling: LPJ-Guess

Page 12: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Two cold climates

LGM: a cold period with ice sheets covereing Northern Europe

Ca 21 000 years agoHeight (meter)

Page 13: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Two cold climates

LGM: a cold period with ice sheets covering most of Northern Europe

Ca 21 000 years agoHeight (meter)

Permafrost: a cold period with relatively small a relativley small ice sheet over Scandinavia

Ca 44 000 år sedan

Page 14: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

A global climate model – forcing and boundary conditions

Forcing: GS12 LGM

Solar insolation Greenhouse gases Ozone pre-industrial concentration Aerosols pre-industrial concentrations

Boundary condtion

Ice sheets Land-sea distribution Sea level -70 m -120 m Topografy & bathymetry Vegetation

Page 15: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

En global klimatmodell – drivning och randvillkor

Forcing: Present day GS12 LGM

Solar insolation Greenhouse gases Ozone Aerosols

Boundary condtion

Ice sheets Land-sea distribution Sea level Topografy & bathymetry Vegetation

Page 16: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

En global klimatmodell – drivning och randvillkor

CO2

(ppm(v)) 200 185

CH4

(ppb(v)) 420 350

N2O

(ppm(v)) 225 200

Forcing: GS12 LGM

Solar insolation Greenhouse gases Ozone Aerosols

Boundary condtion

Ice sheets Land-sea distribution Sea level Topografy & bathymetry Vegetation

Page 17: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Two cold climatesGS12

LGM

Annual mean temperature (T

2m)

Compared to pre-industrial climate

Page 18: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

LGMT

2m and precipitation (relative to recent past)

JJA

DJF

Page 19: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

GS12Annual mean precipitation (relative to recent past)

Page 20: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

GS12 vs. LGMAnnual mean T

2m and sea ice concentration (50%)

Page 21: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

GS12 vs. LGMJanuary-March T

2m and sea ice concentration (50%)

Page 22: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

GS12 vs. LGMJuly-September T

2m and sea ice concentration (50%)

Page 23: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Comparison to proxy SSTLGM January-March

Proxy SST: MARGO Project Members, Nature Geoscience, 2009

Proxy SST Simulated SST

Page 24: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Comparison to proxy SSTGS12 January-March

Proxy SST: Kjellström et. al, Boreas, 2010

δ=simulated minus proxy SST

Sea ice edge (50% conc.)

Page 25: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Summary The simulated GS12 climate is in reasonable agreement with

proxy SST and inferred sea ice extent.

The comparison to proxy SST indicates a cold bias in the central North Atlantic, in contrast to the warm bias found in other studies of MIS3 stadial climate (Pollard and Barron, 2003; van Meerbeeck et al, 2009). This difference is associated to a difference in AMOC response to glacial boundary conditions.

The simulated LGM climate is colder than proxy SST, the largest differences are found in the North Atlantic.

Page 26: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Boundary and forcing conditionsLGM GS12

Insolation 1365 W/m² 1365 W/m²Orbital year 21 ka BP 44 ka BPCO2 (ppm

v) 185 200

CH4 (ppbv) 350 420

N2O (ppbv) 200 225

Ozone PI PISulphate PI PIDust, sea salt PI PIIce sheets ICE5G (21ka BP) Näslund,CLIMBER2,ICE5G (14ka BP)

Land–sea dist ICE5G ICE5GSea level -120 m -120 mTopography, bathymetry ICE5G (21kaBP) ICE5G (21kaBP)Vegetation RP RP

PI = pre-industrial RP = recent past (1990AD)

Page 27: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Comparison to proxy SSTLGM annual mean

Proxy SST: MARGO Project Members, Nature Geoscience, 2009

Proxy SST Simulated SST

Page 28: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Comparison to proxy SSTLGM July-September

Proxy SST: MARGO Project Members, Nature Geoscience, 2009

Proxy SST Simulated SST

Page 29: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Comparison to proxy SSTGS12 annual mean

Proxy SST: Kjellström et. al, Boreas, 2010

δ=simulated minus proxy SST

Sea ice edge (50% conc.)

Page 30: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Comparison to proxy SSTGS12 July-September

Proxy SST: Kjellström et. al, Boreas, 2010

δ=simulated minus proxy SST

Sea ice edge (50% conc.)

Page 31: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

ENSO teleconnectionsJanuary-March

El Niño minus La Niña anomalies in PSL

Based on Niño3 index

Page 32: Jenny Brandefelt KTH Mechanics - SMHI

Sida lånad av Erik Kjellström, SMHI