jennifer koch civics and economics block 2. official name: new york times company vs. sullivan ...
TRANSCRIPT
New York Times vs. Sullivan
Jennifer KochCivics and Economics
Block 2
Official Name:
New York Times Company vs. Sullivan Case Heard:
January of 1964 Case Decided:
March of 1964 Plaintiff:
NY Times Co. Defendant:
L.B. Sullivan
NEW YORK TIMES v. SULLIVAN. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 22 October 2013. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_39>.
Case Overview
Malice and falsity assumed No proof of truth Didn’t need proof of being harmed Sullivan won
(in all courts except US Supreme)
NEW YORK TIMES v. SULLIVAN. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 22 October 2013. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_39>.
Alabama Public Policy
Sullivan was not even mentioned in the ad No proof of malice intent Unaware of the false statements 1st Amendment
Freedom of press Freedom of speech
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0376_0254_ZS.html
Plaintiff (NY Times)
Montgomery city commissioner
Responsible for police department No proof ad was true Under Alabama law Ad contain some false statements
http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/history/new-york-times-company-v-sullivan.html
Defendant(L.B. Sullivan)
New York Times Co.
Washington Post Company The Tribune Company ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)
Sullivan None
http://aclu.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=394
Amicus Curiae Briefs
Ruled in favor of NY Times Co. 9 in favor to 0 opposed 1st amendment
Published statements (even false)
Unless made with malice
http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/history/new-york-times-company-v-sullivan.html
Supreme Court Decision
There was no dissenting opinion 9 to 0 ruling
http://www.freedomforum.org/packages/first/defamationandfirstamendment/casesummaries.htm
Dissenting Opinion
States can not award public officials
Unless malice intent is proven 1st amendment
Published statement (even false) About public officials Unless malice intent
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=376&invol=254
Present Public Policy