jecam collaborative priorities - nasa harvest

30
G20 Global Agriculture Monitoring Initiative GEOGLAM JECAM Collaborative Priorities Pierre Defourny (UCLouvain) and Andrew Davidson (AAFC) Co-leads of JECAM

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

G20 Global Agriculture Monitoring Initiative

GEOGLAM

:JECAM Collaborative Priorities

Pierre Defourny (UCLouvain) and Andrew Davidson (AAFC)Co-leads of JECAM

Page 2: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

The GEO Agricultural Communityof Practice established JECAM in 2009 to enhance internationalR&D collaboration around agriculturalmonitoring towards a better use satelliteEarth Observation.

JECAM achieves this by: Network of voluntary research sites distributed across the world Share standards, time series from EO satellites and in-situ data Supporting methods inter-comparison of mapping, monitoring

and modeling

Origins

Beijing , 2009

Page 3: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

Global network of over 30 voluntary JECAM sites

long-term network of widely distributed sites collecting each year differentEO time series and corresponding in situ data on a voluntary basis to embrace the global diversity of croppings systems

Network

Page 4: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

‱ Develop common standards in definition, reporting methods and field protocols.

‱ Collect and share time-series datasets from a variety of Earth observing satellites and in-situ crop and meteorological measurements

‱ The Committee on Earth Observing Satellites (CEOS) and member agencies support with the acquisition and timely provision of data.

‱ Catalyze R&D activities across JECAM sites to establish a common understanding of the scientific state of the art

‱ Support the scaling up and the transition from research to operational monitoring system as key R&D component of GEOGLAM

4

Principals

Page 5: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

guidelines and reference documents

JECAM guidelines building onbest practices of the communityand collectively endorsed:

- Field data collection andsampling strategy

- Validation protocol

- Definition of annual cropland,typology for crop types andassociated management

- In situ measurements for biophysical variables

Page 6: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

6

guidelines and reference documents

ISO 19144-2 Land Cover Meta Language - 2014

Page 7: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

7

guidelines and reference documents

Page 8: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

– JECAM recommends to follow at least the JECAM guidelines or better

– Three types of in-situ data are expected to be annually collected during the main growing season

Crop mask (cropland and non-cropland)Crop type (main and possibly minor); Crop biophysical variables (e.g.biomass, LAI, fCover, or/and yield)

– Min satellite data requires a combination of optical, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) time series

8

site requirementsMinimum Data Sets (MDS) for both satellite and in-situ data :

Page 9: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

Site configuration– with the implementation of the

minimum dataset concept it is necessary to impose a predefined site configuration

– In order to encompass the diversity of regional crop types and crop development, a typical JECAM site will cover an area of 25 x 25 km (625 sq. km) and be representative of one or several cropping systems

– with a spatially nested core zone of 10 x 10 km (100 sq. km)

9

10 x 10 km for most intensive field measurements

Area of 25 x 25 km representative of the cropping system

site requirements

Page 10: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

10

JECAM Request to CEOS Agencies‱ JECAM has received

a significant number of datasets from CEOS Agencies and has made great progress toward understanding the use of satellite data for agriculture monitoring.

‱ Improved access and coverage + early access to new mission datasets are needed to address the highlighted areas.

From the 2014 JECAM document JECAM Guidelines: Definition of the Minimum Earth Observation Dataset Requirements

supported by a CEOS Ad how WG

Page 11: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

1111

Great CEOS support providing coordinated EO Data access for JECAM sites and a Datacube on-going experiment

Examples: SPOT-4 Take 5 and SPOT-5 Take 5 time series acq.

Radarsat-2 multi-year acquisitionand the MURF license

Pléiades imagery

Harmonized Landsat-Sentinel-2time series

Radarsat Constellation Mission acq.

RADARSAT-Constellation

supported by a CEOS Ad how WG

Page 12: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

Past years science meeting – 2011 Calgary - Training workshop hosted by AAFC – 2014 Ottawa (Canada) hosted by AAFC (AAFC support)– 2015 Brussels (Belgium) hosted by UCLouvain (ESA Sen2-Agri support)– 2016 Kiev (Ukraine) hosted by SRI (FP7-SIGMA support)– 2017 Rome (Italy) hosted by FAO (FP7-SIGMA support)

Forthcoming - JECAM – AsiaRice joint science meeting~ 17-22 Sept. 2018 Taichung (Taiwan) hosted by Taiwan Ag. Res. Inst. (TARI support)

12

annual reporting and science meetings

Brussels 2015 Rome, 2017

Page 13: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

JECAM Experimental achievements3 cross-sites experiments published (6 papers)5 on-going cross-sites experiments

Page 14: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

Crop Calenders

Landscape Pattern/FragmentationArgentina Brazil China Russia Ukraine

14

Large diversityJECAM benchmarking of 5 cropland methods over 5 sites

large field experiment <<<<<<<<<<<<

Page 15: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

<<<<<<<<<<<<

JECAM benchmarking of 5 cropland methods over 5 sites 5 partners to map cropland over 5 sites using the same 250 m MODIS time series and same in situ cal/val datasets

MODIS compatible with 20 ha field for cropland map Similar method accuracies for all 5 methods for a given site Differences (~9 %) according to ag. landscape patterns Influence of the data quality variable according to site

CHINA UKRAINE

large field experiment

Page 16: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

SPOT 4 TAKE 5 FEB. TO MAY 2013

JECAM ARGENTINA

SPOT 5 TAKE 5APR. TO AUG. 2015

JECAM – cropland and crop types methods benchmarking over 12 sites in 2013over 6 sites in 2015

<<<<<<<<<<<<crop type experiment

Page 17: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

JECAM cropland mapping method development 4 JECAM sites to test an innovative cropland classification method

CHINAUKRAINEARGENTINA BELGIUM

<<<<<<<<<<<<cross-site cropland method assessment

Page 18: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

18

JECAM source and density of calibration data (8 sites)

<<<<<<<<<<<<calibration dataset experiment

Comparison of in-situ, crowd- and land cover-derived data sources to understand their applicability for large scale cropland mapping over JECAM sites across the globe

JECAM experiment to assess the impact of the sampling strategy for cropland and crop type mapping Impact of different sampling schemes on cal./val operations - 5 JECAM sites enlarged to 4 Landsat-8 scenes- Investigation for windshield survey impact

Page 19: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

JECAM crop type mapping in 2 contrasted cropping systems in Mali and Bangladesh

<<<<<<<<<<<<smallholder cropping system experim.

Mali Bangladesh

‱ 5 main crop types (cotton, maize, millet, peanut, sorghum)

‱ 1.45 ha±0.86 average field size‱ High heterogeneity level

‱ 2-3 crops per year (rice, lathyrus, mungbean, maize, jute, etc)

‱ Very small fields (~ 0.05 ha)‱ Very homogeneous fields

Page 20: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

20

in situ data model and data licenseSTAC – a data model to capitalize in situ over multiple years and sites (tested by JECAM Argentina)

Open data license to share JECAM data

Page 21: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

JECAM SAR Cross-Sites Inter-comparison – Crop type mapping18 sites sharing in situ data and AAFC pre-processing all data

SAR experiments

i. Applying Operational SAR and Optical Classification Methods to Multiple Regions:

a) Applying Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) Earth Observation Crop Inventory Method to other JECAM Sites

b) Applying JECAM Member Sites’ SAR and Optical, OR SAR only (single frequency) Classification Methodologies to Multiple Regions

ii. Reducing the Impact of Cloud Cover on Operational Crop Inventories

iii. Multi-frequency SAR imagery for Crop Type Mapping

iv. Compact polarimetry and/or polarimetric decomposition variables for Crop Type Mapping.

Led by Andrew Davidson, Laura Dingle-Robertson (AAFC)

Page 22: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

22

JECAM SAR Cross-Sites Intercomparison – Biomass mapping10 sites sharing in situ data and AAFC pre-processing all data

SAR experiments

i. Enhance models using available data over Canadian and international JECAM sites

ii. Compare the WCM model with other models have been used by other JECAM sites

iii. Extend the model to other interested crop types such as rice

iv. Adapt the model to multi-frequency and Compact-Pol SAR.

Led by Heather McNairn, Mehdi Hosseini (AAFC)

Page 23: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

impacts

JECAM allows to Involve JECAM partners in a fully international framework

Establish common standards to be able to dialog, to cross-compare and exchange on results

Raise the research standards and best practices for the JECAM partners

Mutually improve EO methods and in situ practicesthrough exchange and sometimes field visits

Attractive network for various initiatives

JECAM leverage resources from ESA Sentinel-2 for Agriculture, BMGates Foundation, FP7-SIGMA, FP7-Imagines, AAFC SAR inter-comparison, and link to AsiaRice

Page 24: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

RESEARCH NEEDS and COLLABORATIVE PRIORITIES

Priorities and opportunities fromJECAM and USDA-AAFC perspective

Page 25: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

research prioritiesShort term priorities from JECAM (within the year)o SAR on-the-job training for the JECAM SAR Inter-comparisons:

- in situ data collection (SAR specific protocols)- SAR time series exploitation by each JECAM team (Radarsat-2, Sentinel-1,

possibly TerraSAR-X)- SAR-optical synergy for crop type mapping and biomass

o Sentinel-2 time series exploitation using Sen2-Agri system versus alternative strategy :

- Training session for the JECAM teams starting with Sen2-Agri- On-going experience sharing through Sen2-Agri webinars- Exploitation using a virtual machine on cloud computing- Targeting marginal crop mapping in various contexts (limits and feasibility)

o Assessment of the HLS time series in different contexts

o Development of quantitative metrics for yield assessment


To be completed by the JECAM network members

Page 26: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

research prioritiesMid-term priorities from JECAM (0 to 2 years)

o In situ yield measurements : protocols and standards compatible with EO time series to discuss and recommend

o Yield estimation from EO and/or crop modelling, including the use of new ancillary datasets like IMERG, SMAP level 4 products, etc.

o Field delineation algorithm to be tested in different cropping systems

o Algorithm benchmarking for machine learning, phenometrics, and practices management across sites and geographies


TBD at the annual science meeting

Page 27: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

research prioritiesOpportunities for LTAR sites to join the JECAM networkaccording to the mandate of the LTAR sites ?

o Compare his/her own in situ and EO practices with regards to existing JECAM standards and exchange with others about these practices

o Get access to EO time series specifically of interest for agriculture monitoring

o Get exposed to globally distributed colleagues, challenges and get trained thanks to a very open and focused atmosphere

o Partner with scientific team to exploit long term archive across sites with shared methods

Page 28: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

research prioritiesOpportunities for JECAM through a USDA-NASA-AAFC-SIAP partnerships

o Assessment of various new products in different cropping systems wherever they are available ou could proposed:o Evaporative Stress Index (ARS), o soil moisture product (USDA-NASA), o “Wetness” index (AAFC)o Greensat for Nitrogen management (SAGARPA-SIAP)

o Canadian Crop Yield Forecaster (AAFC - N.Newland)

o JECAM sites to be considered for the NISAR mission Cal/Val

o UAV exploitation to support in situ data measurements and scaling up

Page 29: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

About Becoming a JECAM Member

Simple process:- Fill a questionnaire to document the site- Complete an annual report describing their research - Attend the annual science meeting- Be willing to share their science and data with other sites in the network

The value sites get from JECAM in proportional to their engagement

JECAM is a research platform, not a funder, however the coordinated nature of JECAM provides a compelling opportunity to attract research funding (national or international sponsors).

Please contact JECAM through the JECAM website (JECAM.org) or directly to Andrew Davidson( [email protected] )

Page 30: JECAM Collaborative Priorities - NASA Harvest

for more info - JECAM.ORG

Thank you for your attention