jan klein lecture 4 - mit opencourseware · •empathy, equality, spontaneity, problem orientation...

15
Team Processes Jan Klein Lecture 4

Upload: others

Post on 28-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Team Processes

Jan Klein

Lecture 4

Page 2: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Managing Team Processes

• Goals

• Understand critical, generic team processes

• Practice analyzing a “team” using these concepts

• Encourage use of these concepts in your teams

• Approach

• Analyze team processes of a jury

Page 3: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Generic Processes

• Communication

• Influence

• Task Functions

• Maintenance Functions

• Decision-Making

• Conflict Management

• Emotional Environment

• Atmosphere

Page 4: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Communication

• Who are the most frequent communicators?

• What is the effect of their participation?

• Who are the least frequent communicators?

• What is the effect of their lack of participation?

• Are there shifts in participation/communication?

• What causes this?

• Who talks to whom? Who responds to whom?

Who triggers whom?

• How are “silent” and “noisy” members handled?

Page 5: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Influence

• How does the formal leader exert influence?• How strongly does he/she influence the group?

• Who has the most impact on the group’s actions and decisions?

• Whose ideas are ignored?• What is the result?

• What influence tactics are group members using?Rational persuasion Inspirational appeals

Consultation Ingratiating

Personal appeals Exchange / reciprocity

Coalition tactics Pressure / intimidation

Legitimating tactics

• Is there rivalry in the group?• What effect does it have?

Page 6: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Task Functions

Organizing to get the task accomplished

• Initiating

• Seeking information / opinions

• Providing information or opinions

• Clarifying

• Elaborating

• Summarizing

• Consensus Testing

Page 7: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Task Functions: Questions

• Do group members make suggestions as to the best way

to proceed?

• Who does so? How frequently?

• Do members give or ask for information, feelings,

feedback?

• How is the team kept on target?

• Do some members emerge as “task leaders”?

• Are all ideas given adequate discussion before evaluation

begins?

• Does the group summarize what has been covered?

Page 8: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Maintenance Functions

Holding the group together so that its members can

continue to get along

• Harmonizing

• Compromising

• Gatekeeping

• Encouraging

Page 9: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Maintenance Functions: Questions

• Are all members encouraged to enter into the

discussion and made to feel part of the group?

• Are team members careful to reject ideas and not

people? In what way?

• Are conflicts among members ignored or

addressed in some way?

Page 10: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Decision-Making

• Does the group follow the four key steps in decision-

making?

• Identifying the problem, Analyzing the problem, Proposing

and evaluating solutions, Implementing decisions

• Does one person make the decision for everyone?

• How many people actively participate in decision-making?

• Does the team vote and let majority rule?

• Does the team strive for consensus?

• Does the team encourage minority opinions?

Page 11: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Conflict

• How often do members disagree about the work to be

done?

• To what extent are there arguments about how to do the

task?

• To what extent do people in the group take arguments

personally?

• How often do members get angry with one another?

• How is that handled by the group?

• Are conflicts resolved or simply “buried”?

Page 12: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Atmosphere &

Emotional Environment

• Would you characterize the environment as

supportive?• Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation

• Defensive?• Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”,

Superiority, Dogmatism?

• Are people friendly and open or very formal with

each other?

• Are people involved and interested?• Is there an atmosphere of work? Play? Competition?

Page 13: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Atmosphere &

Emotional Environment (cont.)

• Is there an attempt to avoid unpleasantness of

ignoring tough issues?

• Are members grappling with emotional issues?

• Is there evidence of disruptive behaviors, including:

– fighting and controlling

– withdrawing

– dependency (waiting passively for a leader to emerge) OR

– counterdependency (opposing or resisting anyone in the

group who represents authority)?

Page 14: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

Exhibit I

Bank T

elle

r

with

gla

sse

s

Ow

ne

r of th

e

Me

sse

ng

er S

vc.

(Le

e J

. Co

bb

)

Sto

ck B

roke

r

with

gla

sse

s

Ma

n fro

m s

lum

s

Ho

use

Pa

inte

r in

wh

ite s

hirt, n

o tie

Ad M

an

with

gla

sse

s

Wa

tch

maker

with

mu

sta

ch

e

Gara

ge O

wner

with

a c

old

Th

e O

ld M

an

Arc

hite

ct

(He

nry

Fo

nd

a)

Th

e F

ore

ma

n

Assis

tan

t Co

ach

Page 15: Jan Klein Lecture 4 - MIT OpenCourseWare · •Empathy, Equality, Spontaneity, Problem orientation •Defensive? •Evaluation / judging, Control, Stratagems / “games”, Superiority,

MIT OpenCourseWarehttp://ocw.mit.edu

15.317 Organizational Leadership and Change

Summer 2009

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.