jactone arogo ogejo and john ignosh ; virginia tech ...ww2.bse.vt.edu/green/biogas/arogo et...
TRANSCRIPT
Anaerobic Digesters an Overview
Jactone Arogo Ogejo and John Ignosh ; Virginia TechStephanie Lansing and Gary Felton, University of
Maryland
Focus of presentation
Biomethane production through anaerobic digestion of organic matter
Source: www.water-technology.net
Biomethane – What is it?
It is similar to natural gas Part of biogas produced through
anaerobic digestion of organic matter
Methane Structure
Biogas Composition ~ 55 to 80% methane (active ingredient) ~ up to 35% carbon dioxide and other trace gases (e.g.
hydrogen sulfide; water vapor) Energy content ~ 55 to 80% of natural gas
FeedstocksProteins
CarbohydratesFats
Organic Acids
Biogas
Feedstock Sources Animal manure Municipal wastes (organic) Food waste (Processing
Industries; Cafeterias e.t.c.) Garden waste Sewage sludge Energy crops e.g. corn
silage, beet
Biomethane –How is it Produced?
Acid Forming Bacteria
MethaneForming Bacteria
Anaerobic Digestion Process
AD: Byproducts and Utilization
AnaerobicDigester
• Electricity• Heat• Pipeline grade gas• Transportation fuel• Renewable Energy credits• Carbon credits
Biogas
Organic
Material
Effluent
Solid &liquid
• Fertilizer• Compost• Bedding• Biofuel
USE
Example biogas options in the US and Virginia Dairies
SOURCES: AgSTAR Anaerobic Digestion Capital Costs for Dairy Farms - Feb. 2009An Analysis of Energy Production Costs from Anaerobic Digestion Systems on U.S. Livestock Production Facilities NRCS, 2007
Little information about dairies with < 500 cows
Projected average size 120 cows
Would biogas make sense for farmers in central Shenandoah Valley use diesel generators for farm’s electricity needs
Is there an opportunity here?
What about nutrient management issues?
Capital Cost of Anaerobic Digestion Systems
Fuel Cost Comparison
?
Dairies Operating in the U.S.
Adapted from: USDA, NASS Farms, Land in Farms and Livestock Operations
Herd Size (Head Cattle)
Number of Farms in 2006
Percent of Total Farms
1-29 21,280 28.3%30-49 14,145 18.8%50-99 22,215 29.6%
100-199 9,780 13.0%200-499 4,577 6.1%500-999 1,700 2.3%
1,000-1,999 870 1.2%2,000+ 573 0.8%Total 75,140 100.0%
71,997 Farms, or 95.8% of the Total
Burns, 2009. Current State of Manure Anaerobic Digestion in the U.S. and Beyond. Energy Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure. Madison, WI. September 28-29, 2009
135 350 822
5000
16000
02000400060008000
1000012000140001600018000
United States Austria China (2000) Germany China (2009)
Large-Scale Anaerobic Digesters
Over 20,000 worldwide
Burns, 2009. Current State of Manure Anaerobic Digestion in the U.S. and Beyond. Energy Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure. Madison, WI. September 28-29, 2009
Over 40 million worldwide
13
1000 300010000
4000000 800000037000000
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
100000000
United States
Africa S.E. Asia Latin America
India China (2000)
China (2009)
Small-Scale Anaerobic Digesters
Small-Scale AD Globally
• China and India lead the way
• Increased economic viability
• Spreading widely throughout Asia, Southern Africa, & Latin America(Buxton & Reed, 2010)
• Cold-climate, small-scale AD lags behind– Most projects promoting
concept
International Small-Scale AD:Numerous Designs
All attempting to minimize cost & maximize performance…
Numerous Feedstocks
• Primary wastes– Animal & livestock
manure– Food waste
• Secondary wastes– Human manure– Agricultural waste
Sources: (Akinbami, 2001; Bi, 2006;
Voegeli, 2008)
Photo Credits: (U.S. NRCS, Jean Ryder, www.docklandsrecycling.co.uk)
Use of Products• Biogas
– Primary: Cooking, Heating, Lighting(Munyehirwe & Kabanda, 2008; Mi, 2007; Singh & Sooch, 2004 )
– Secondary: Electricity(Lansing et al., 2008)
• Effluent– Fertilizer– Feed
• Solids– Compost
Floating dome/Floating bell
• “Indian” model• Mixed Waste• Waste movement
due to hydrostatic pressure
• Internal divider designed to prevent short-circuiting
• High maintenance(Buxton & Reed, 2010; Lawbuary, 2006; Singh &
Sooch, 2003)
Fixed Dome• “Chinese” model
designs vary– Janata and
Deenbandhu(Buxton & Reed, 2010; Khoiyangbam et al., 2004; Singh & Sooch, 2003)
• Mixed waste• Less maintenance,
longer lifespan(Buxton & Reed, 2010; Singh & Sooch, 2003)
Plug-Flow Bag Digesters
• Widespread• Intended for higher
solids waste• Waste moves in
“plugs”• Cheap, but history
of problems w/integrity(Lansing, 2010; Eaton - IRRI Mexico, 2009)
Costa Rica digesters
• Tubular Polyethylene Plastic Bag
• No Mechanical Parts• Simple to build and
operate• Low-cost ($150-1500)
Covered Lagoon• Low maintenance• No heating• Lower biogas
production, esp. during winter
• Wonderful for odor control
http://www.em-group.co.th/images/cover_lagoo
n11.JPG
Predominant challenges
• Lack of skilled technicians– Construction– Maintenance/troubleshooting
• Blockages within systems• Solids accumulation &
associated maintenance• Lack of engineering knowledge
for upgrading
Sources: Munyehirwe, 2008
Photo source: AIDG
International Trends• Mass production of proven designs
• Higher quality materials– HDPE, Fiberglass
• Household and small-community units
International Trends
• Integrated farming systems(Mi, 2007; Todd, 2006; Marchaim,1992)
• Increased government subsidies(Mi, 2007)
Diagram credit: Mi, 2007
Digesters in Cold Climates
• Gas production drops with decreasing temperature– Increased retention time
• Leads to increased size/capital requirements– Maintenance of digester temperature
• Leads to higher energy inputs/sophistication of equipment
• Additional insulation
University of Maryland -Small-Scale Plug Flow Setup
• Influent pre-heated• Effluent recirculated & reheated• Digesters insulated & buried• Hot water circulation for additional heating
University of Maryland Project: Small-Scale Plug Flow
Aims of research• Economic analysis• Energy yield & system function: unseparated vs. separated manure• Contribution of effluent recirculation• Small-scale vs. Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor (CSTR) on same
substrate• Emergy modeling
Additional Small-Scale Research in the U.S.
• Ohio State University– Modification of Chinese fixed-dome digester
• Designed for small family/farm use• Also looking at effluent recirculation
Additional Small-Scale Research in the U.S.
• University of Wisconsin - Platteville– Compost heated plug-flow digester
AD in VA – What is the answer?
Co-Digestion or Comingling
Centralized AD System
Improved process efficiency
New technology
Example: Central Shenandoah Valley
Source: USDA-NASS 2002 Census of Agriculture
County / Value $1,000
Augusta
Rockingham
Page
She
nand
oa
Valley
Identify and map sources of organic residueswho, what, and where?develop map that shows
relative distances of sources
Determine the quantities of organic residues how many pounds?
What is in the composition of the organic residueScreen for biomethane
production potentialNutrients
Determine the optimum mix of organic materials to produce maximum quality and quantity of gas
Many dairies, but smaller than the size required for a conventional AD system
Combine the high volume, homogenous poultry processing waste streams with manure from surrounding dairies to generate more biogas per unit volume of digester
The Bay Watershed…
Big Question – how to clean up?
• Stop urban development and growth?
• Stop Agriculture?
40Source: Chesapeake Bay Program
Should we be concerned about availability of Phosphorus?
• Demand for P predicted to peak in 2030
Cordell et al. 2009
41
Phosphateforum.org
Sustainable P Utilization….
Recover and Reuse P from all feasible sources: municipal wastewater treatment plants, animal manures, and industrial waste water
Thank You
Questions?
Source: Moffatt B., AgStar Conference 2007
Contact:Jactone Arogo OgejoBiological Systems EngineeringVirginia Tech(540) 231 [email protected]