jack welch the great corporate communicator
TRANSCRIPT
GE’s Jack Welch: The Great Corporate Communicator
There have been volumes written about Jack Welch, whose management practices have
made him one of the most celebrated and respected leaders and educators in corporate
America. Indeed, many top managers of Fortune 500 companies, including CEOs at over
a dozen U.S companies, got their training by working at senior management positions
under Welch.
Our purpose here is to focus on his genius for corporate communication and what we
might take away from his example for our own use. From this perspective, four
interrelated themes emerge from his activities as CEO of GE: the strong partnership
between communication and strategic planning, the place of communication as a core
organizational value in transforming the company and sustaining its vitality, the role of
communication for GE as a “learning organization,” and the importance of streamlining
communications by reducing unnecessary bureaucracy.
Communication as a Part of Strategic Planning. For Welch, communication took
center stage in all his efforts to create strategic change at GE. Were we to follow him
through a typical year’s planning cycle, we’d see that he scheduled numerous
opportunities for informal, intense dialogues with his 35 direct reports, who were held
accountable for explaining and defending their strategic recommendations for their
businesses.
As described to shareholders in the GE Annual Report for 2000. Welch’s meetings with
senior management, known as the “GE Operating System,” represent a “series of intense
learning sessions in which business CEOs, role models and initiative champions from GE
as well as outside companies, meet and share the intellectual capital of the world : its best
ideas.” In Corporate Executive Council (CEC) meetings, which typically begin at 8 A.M
and run until 10 P.M, talk ranges from reviews of performance targets to discussions of
best practices, customer impact, and succession planning, including selection of
candidates for leadership training.
The Welch calendar of meetings may be planned ahead with goals and agendas, but the
meetings themselves are anything but formal in tone. As a firsthand observer reported,
These sessions earn descriptions from executives like “food fights” and “free-for-alls.”
They are where Welch collected unfiltered information, challenged and tested his top
players, and made sure that the organization’s triumphs and failures were openly shared.
“I may be kidding myself,” says Welch, “but going to a CEC meeting for me is like going
to a fraternity party and hanging around friends. When I tell my wife I can hardly wait to
go, she says, ‘Well, why wouldn’t you? You hired them all!’ If you like business, sitting
in that room with all these different businesses, all coming up with new ideas, is just a
knock-out.
Moreover, important strategic issues – like acquiring new businesses or selling old ones –
were typically addressed at one session and scrutinized again and again at later meetings
of the full CEC or in smaller groups. When CEC was not in session, Welch could be
found traveling to each of the separate GE businesses for a closer review of their
operations. Welch met many of his employees, and
….every one of Welch’s direct reports – from three vice-chairmen to each of the
operating heads of GE’s 12 businesses.... receives a handwritten, two-page evaluation of
his performance at the end of the year. “ I do the evaluations on Sunday nights in my
library at home,” says Welch. “It gives me a chance to reflect on each business.”
Attached to the detailed notes are his jottings from a year earlier, with new comments
written in red pencil in the margins. “Nice job.” “Still needs work.”
As his work with senior management indicates, Welch takes a hands-on approach,
motivating through compelling words and actions.
Communication as a Core Value: Repeat! Repeat! Repeat! The company’s chief
strategist and communicator, Welch was the teacher, role model, and coach for all his
employees. As biographer Robert Slater described him:
He is the communicator par excellence. Of all his management secrets, his
uncanny ability to communicate, to engender an enthusiasm in employees, may be
his greatest. He knows that it is not enough to simply raise an idea with
employees. He’s not naïve enough to believe that all 270,000 of his workers will
absorb his ideas the first time around. He knows that he will have to keep
repeating an idea until it finally sinks in with everyone at the company.
Repeating ideas ensured that they were heard broadly, but, as important, Welch was
selective in what he broadcast, choosing to communicate ideas at the heart of his vision
for GE, core values he wanted to inculcate in his employees. He expressed these ideas
simply and with passion, and disseminated them across the company’s key constituencies
– in the shareholder’s letter in the company’s annual report, in talks with employees and
financial analysts, in interviews with the press. Rather than “hot-house” ideas that die as
soon as they are uttered, through the force of selective repetition, Welch’s messages had
high impact, functioning as guidelines for action.
Welch, however, could not do it all. Rather, he taught by example: going out into the
field, leading the communications effort, and establishing expectations that management
would follow his lead. His job was to motivate senior management, and they, in turn,
motivated the ones below them – and on and on in this way through the ranks. The
communication process might be described as a kind of cascading movement:
As if in lockstep, each business chieftain ... emulates the behavior of the boss, and their
reports, in turn, do the same. After Welch's Boca meeting [a CEC meeting] in January,
for instance, Lloyd G. Trotter, CEO of GE's electrical-distribution and -control business,
had his own 2-1 /2 day leadership conference in Orlando with his top 250 people. And in
February, after Welch gave him his bonus and reiterated the targets for the remainder of
this year, Trotter then followed through in similar fashion with the 97 people in his
organization who received cash bonuses. Other GE businesses follow the same format.
Not surprisingly, some of Welch's most memorable ideas are themselves about
communication as a core value. Several of these GE values appear on a wallet-size card
that all employees are supposed to carry: "GE Leaders...Always with Unyielding Integrity
Create a Clear, Simple, Reality-Based Vision...and Communicate It to All
Constituencies." Here Welch stressed how important it is for leaders to express
themselves succinctly and clearly. Using this style of communication maximizes the
possibility that key strategic ideas will make sense to a broad base of constituents and
have a positive impact on all of them. "GE Leaders...Always with Unyielding Integrity
Have the Self-Confidence to Involve Everyone and Behave in a Boundaryless Fashion."
Here Welch emphasized the entrepreneurial aspects of communication, that is, the need
for leaders to pay serious attention to new ideas that come from any source, including not
only those of senior executives but also those of workers at the lowest ranks. As an
advocate of the "democratization" of communication, Welch established a climate in
which people from the lowest level to top management could "throw in their oar" in
conversations about the company's present and future.
The two sections that follow put the spotlight on two of the communication challenges
articulated in the short, high-impact messages of the GE employee value card:
• The role of Work-Out, a New England village-style forum for communication that
Welch initiated in late 1980, in supporting and extending communications throughout
the firm
• The creation of a leaner organization, better prepared to respond to threats and
implement new ideas
Work-Out: Extending Communication More Deeply into the Organization. "GE
Leaders.. Always with Unyielding Integrity Are Open to Ideas from Any where... and
Committed to Work-Out," says the GE employee value card. Although "Work-Out" may
sound like an aerobics exercise routine from the 1980s, it was, in fact, one of the premier
communication processes at GE. Initiated in the late 1980s, "Work-Out" was a forum for
brainstorming and decision making for employees and their bosses that reached down
into the organization. The process extended dialogue and debate beyond the very senior
ranks, ensuring that GE remained an informal "learning organization." Whereas
executives have described the Corporate Executive Council (CEC) meetings as "food
fights" and "free-for-alls," the culminating event at Work-Out resembled a grueling oral
examination with questions and recommendations hurled at managers by their
subordinates.
As described in the early days, Work-Out consisted of three-day sessions where groups
of 40 to 100 employees exchanged ideas about their business and how to improve it. At
the first session, once the unit boss set up the agenda, he or she departed, and the sessions
included only a facilitator and the boss's subordinates, who brainstormed about the unit's
problems and possible solutions. When the boss returned on the final day, he or she was
subjected to rapid-fire comments and recommendations by subordinates, required to
make decisions based on the recommendations, and if necessary, to form a team for
follow-up research. Imagine the kind of scrutiny and accountability the bosses faced in
this lively public forum. Consider how important their understanding of corporate
communication is to holding down their position, and, from a broader perspective, to
reaching the best decisions for the organization. As an indication of just how deeply the
approach permeated the organization, "by 1992, over 200,000 GE employees—along
with customers, suppliers, and others—had experienced Work-Out in contrast to 10,000
managers annually attending programs at Crotonville [GE's management training
center]." Early on, Work-Outs focused on streamlining the stodgy, slow-moving
bureaucratic processes at the firm, but later sessions dealt with how to improve
productivity, quality, and customer and supplier relationships.
Cut Through Bureaucracy! When he assumed leadership of GE in the 1980s, Welch
inherited a huge bureaucracy with communication processes and procedures that slowed
down strategic decision making. The business heads spent endless hours compiling thick
written documentation about strategy, an activity that deflected their attention from
purposeful work. To create an organizational context for growth, Welch had his business
heads replace these tomes with short "playbooks" that identified important strategies, and
used these documents as the springboard for his strategic discussions with management.
Increasingly, face-to-face talk replaced time-consuming written procedures.
By the late 1990s, the company had all but removed old-fashioned written
communication. GE is practically a paperless organization. With the exception of the
annual report in which Welch liked to spell out to investors his map and vision of the
company, communication at GE means face-to-face meetings, videos, and Web-based
communications. Everything that used to be on paper is now on the Web, allowing for
instantaneous communication across the business units and 120 countries in which GE
operates. What better way to connect a sprawling, diversified company, to reach
everyone in real time, and to connect with lots of people on the road located in eight
separate businesses that span the globe. No longer encumbered by tons of paper, GE
increasingly relies on e-mail and face-to-face discussions, communication channels that
allow for the informal exchange of ideas. Many senior-level managers applauded his
initiatives:
"I still remember him [Welch] coming to Louisville, Ky, and saying, 'Lemme tell you
how I'm going to get rid of all this bureaucracy," says Bruce Albertson, formerly an
executive at GE Appliances in Louisville, Ky. "Everyone is sitting there saying,
‘Yeah, right.' But he ripped the bureaucracy right out of the middle of that company.
All that churn we used to do, preparing internal charts for people who gave them to
someone else who gave them to someone else who gave them to Jack, did go away".
To spread and invigorate the exchange of ideas, Welch dispensed with layers of
management early in his tenure. From the early 1980s to the early 1990s, he reduced the
number of management levels between himself and those in the field from nine to
between four and six.20 A leaner organization meant, in his words, the ability for "GE to
develop a big-company body in a small-company soul,"21 to operate with the agility and
nimbleness of a small entrepreneurial firm. Equally important is what he calls the
"delayering" of the organization—the reduction of management levels—that has created
a climate in which great ideas can be heard, and, for those that pass the rigorous test of
scrutiny and debate, implemented. The leaner organization made it easier for employees
at GE, in Welch's words, to "Find great ideas, exaggerate them, and spread them like hell
around the business with the speed of light."
Welch's assumption of the top leadership position occurred during a time of relative
stability at GE. From our perspective, many of the initiatives he championed and the
culture he shaped were able to stave off the potential inertia of the more than 100-year-
old firm whose command he assumed. When an organization faces the perils of inertia, as
in the case of GE, CEOs, armed with a knowledge of corporate communication, can work
wonders in leading their organizations through change to renewed health and vitality.
Upon taking the reins and throughout his tenure, Welch recognized the need to target
important constituencies and to keep communicating key ideas simply and with passion.
He knew he had to use face-to-face communications to build credibility and then to
maintain relationships with internal constituencies—employees and senior management
—who are potentially the most powerful goodwill ambassadors for a firm as it reaches
outside its walls. Welch made communication a core value and included it as part of
every senior manager's performance review to ensure that this value permeated the
organization. And he did not do this all alone. Support came from, among other venues,
the corporate communication function. In the next section, we look at the role of these
managers in ensuring that corporate communication works successfully in support of
their organizations.